Migraine in the Era of Precision Medicine
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Perception of Facial Expressions in Social Anxiety and Gaze Anxiety
The Pegasus Review: UCF Undergraduate Research Journal (URJ) Volume 9 Issue 1 Article 6 2016 Perception of Facial Expressions in Social Anxiety and Gaze Anxiety Aaron Necaise University of Central Florida, [email protected] Part of the Psychology Commons Find similar works at: https://stars.library.ucf.edu/urj University of Central Florida Libraries http://library.ucf.edu This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Office of Undergraduate Research at STARS. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Pegasus Review: UCF Undergraduate Research Journal (URJ) by an authorized editor of STARS. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Recommended Citation Necaise, Aaron (2016) "Perception of Facial Expressions in Social Anxiety and Gaze Anxiety," The Pegasus Review: UCF Undergraduate Research Journal (URJ): Vol. 9 : Iss. 1 , Article 6. Available at: https://stars.library.ucf.edu/urj/vol9/iss1/6 Necaise: Perception of Facial Expressions Social Anxiety & Gaze Anxiety Published Vol. 9.1: 40-47 October 19th, 2017 THE UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA UNDERGRADUATE RESEARCH JOURNAL Analysis of the Pathomechanism and Treatment of Migraines Related to the Role of the Neuropeptide CGRP By: Marvi S. Qureshi Faculty Mentor: Dr. Mohtashem Samsam UCF Burnett School of Biomedical Sciences ABSTRACT: Migraines are a type of headache that specifically act on only one side of the head, although about 30% of patients with migraines may experience a bilateral headache. Migraines are brain disorders that typically involve issues of sensory processing taking place in the brainstem. Possible causation has been linked to blood vessels, blood flow, and oxygen levels in the brain. -
Potential Mechanisms of Prospective Antimigraine Drugs: a Focus on Vascular (Side) Effects
CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by Elsevier - Publisher Connector Pharmacology & Therapeutics 129 (2011) 332–351 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Pharmacology & Therapeutics journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/pharmthera Associate Editor: John Fozard Potential mechanisms of prospective antimigraine drugs: A focus on vascular (side) effects Kayi Y. Chan a, Steve Vermeersch b, Jan de Hoon b, Carlos M. Villalón c, Antoinette MaassenVanDenBrink a,⁎ a Division of Vascular Medicine and Pharmacology, Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, P.O. Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands b Center for Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospitals Leuven, Campus Gasthuisberg, (K.U. Leuven), Leuven, Belgium c Departamento de Farmacobiología, Cinvestav-Coapa, Czda. de los Tenorios 235, Col. Granjas-Coapa, Deleg. Tlalpan, C.P. 14330, México D.F., Mexico article info abstract Available online 2 December 2010 Currently available drugs for the acute treatment of migraine, i.e. ergot alkaloids and triptans, are cranial vasoconstrictors. Although cranial vasoconstriction is likely to mediate—at least a part of—their therapeutic Keywords: effects, this property also causes vascular side-effects. Indeed, the ergot alkaloids and the triptans have been Antimigraine drugs reported to induce myocardial ischemia and stroke, albeit in extremely rare cases, and are contraindicated in Neuropeptides patients with known cardiovascular risk factors. In view of these limitations, novel antimigraine drugs -
Current and Prospective Pharmacological Targets in Relation to Antimigraine Action
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Erasmus University Digital Repository Naunyn-Schmiedeberg’s Arch Pharmacol (2008) 378:371–394 DOI 10.1007/s00210-008-0322-7 REVIEW Current and prospective pharmacological targets in relation to antimigraine action Suneet Mehrotra & Saurabh Gupta & Kayi Y. Chan & Carlos M. Villalón & David Centurión & Pramod R. Saxena & Antoinette MaassenVanDenBrink Received: 8 January 2008 /Accepted: 6 June 2008 /Published online: 15 July 2008 # The Author(s) 2008 Abstract Migraine is a recurrent incapacitating neuro- (CGRP1 and CGRP2), adenosine (A1,A2,andA3), glutamate vascular disorder characterized by unilateral and throbbing (NMDA, AMPA, kainate, and metabotropic), dopamine, headaches associated with photophobia, phonophobia, endothelin, and female hormone (estrogen and progesterone) nausea, and vomiting. Current specific drugs used in the receptors. In addition, we have considered some other acute treatment of migraine interact with vascular receptors, targets, including gamma-aminobutyric acid, angiotensin, a fact that has raised concerns about their cardiovascular bradykinin, histamine, and ionotropic receptors, in relation to safety. In the past, α-adrenoceptor agonists (ergotamine, antimigraine therapy. Finally, the cardiovascular safety of dihydroergotamine, isometheptene) were used. The last two current and prospective antimigraine therapies is touched decades have witnessed the advent of 5-HT1B/1D receptor upon. agonists (sumatriptan and second-generation triptans), which have a well-established efficacy in the acute Keywords 5-HT. Antimigraine drugs . CGRP. treatment of migraine. Moreover, current prophylactic Noradrenaline . Migraine . Receptors treatments of migraine include 5-HT2 receptor antagonists, Ca2+ channel blockers, and β-adrenoceptor antagonists. Despite the progress in migraine research and in view of its Introduction complex etiology, this disease still remains underdiagnosed, and available therapies are underused. -
Serotonin Receptor Knockouts: a Moody Subject David Julius* Department of Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143-0450
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 95, pp. 15153–15154, December 1998 Commentary Serotonin receptor knockouts: A moody subject David Julius* Department of Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143-0450 The neurotransmitter serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine; 5-HT) receptors are expressed in a number of brain regions to which is believed to play a significant role in determining one’s serotonergic neurons project, including the hippocampus, ce- emotional state. Indeed, serotonergic synapses are sites of rebral cortex, and amygdala (11, 12). As in the case of action for a number of mood-altering drugs, including the presynaptic autoreceptors, activation of postsynaptic 5-HT1A now-legendary antidepressant Prozac (fluoxetine) (1). As a receptors leads to hyperpolarization of the neuron and the result, there has been tremendous interest in identifying consequent inhibition of neurotransmitter release. This effect molecular components of the serotonergic system, including appears to be mediated through a biochemical signaling path- cell surface receptors and transporters, and understanding way in which 5-HT1A receptors activate a G protein (Gi)- whether and how these proteins contribute to the regulation of coupled inwardly rectifying potassium channel (13, 14). mood and emotion. This quest is driven, in part, by the In light of the pharmacological evidence that 5-HT1A re- possibility that behavioral disorders, such as depression or ceptors exert negative ‘‘feedback’’ control on serotonergic anxiety, may be linked to deficits in one or more components neurons, one would predict that mice lacking this receptor of this signaling system. Such information could, in turn, focus should show elevated levels of extraneuronal serotonin, or an attention on specific targets for the development of novel increase in the amount of serotonin released after nerve drugs with which to treat psychiatric disorders. -
Does Sumatriptan Cross the Blood–Brain Barrier in Animals and Man?
J Headache Pain (2010) 11:5–12 DOI 10.1007/s10194-009-0170-y REVIEW ARTICLE Does sumatriptan cross the blood–brain barrier in animals and man? Peer Carsten Tfelt-Hansen Received: 24 August 2009 / Accepted: 27 October 2009 / Published online: 10 December 2009 Ó Springer-Verlag 2009 Abstract Sumatriptan, a relatively hydrophilic triptan, development [6, 7] or an effect on trigeminovascular nerves based on several animal studies has been regarded to be [6]. A peripheral effect on trigeminal vascular nerves was unable to cross the blood–brain barrier (BBB). In more indicated by the blocking effect of sumatriptan of neuro- recent animal studies there are strong indications that genically mediated plasma extravasation [8]. Inhibitors of sumatriptan to some extent can cross the BBB. The CNS neurogenic inflammation (NI) were, however, ineffective in adverse events of sumatriptan in migraine patients and the treatment of migraine [9] and it is thus difficult to normal volunteers also indicate a more general effect of ascribe a pivotal role for NI in migraine. In 1996 it was, sumatriptan on CNS indicating that the drug can cross the based on the effect of zolmitriptan, suggested that inhibition BBB in man. It has been discussed whether a defect in the of trigeminal neurons in the brain stem by lipophilic triptans BBB during migraine attacks could be responsible for a may play a role in the anti-migraine effect of these drugs possible central effect of sumatriptan in migraine. This and that these results offered the prospect of a third path- review suggests that there is no need for a breakdown in the ophysiological target site for triptans [10]. -
Genetics of Migraine: Insights Into the Molecular Basis of Migraine Disorders
This may be the author’s version of a work that was submitted/accepted for publication in the following source: Sutherland, Heidi& Griffiths, Lyn (2017) Genetics of migraine: Insights into the molecular basis of migraine disor- ders. Headache, 57(4), pp. 537-569. This file was downloaded from: https://eprints.qut.edu.au/105633/ c Consult author(s) regarding copyright matters This work is covered by copyright. Unless the document is being made available under a Creative Commons Licence, you must assume that re-use is limited to personal use and that permission from the copyright owner must be obtained for all other uses. If the docu- ment is available under a Creative Commons License (or other specified license) then refer to the Licence for details of permitted re-use. It is a condition of access that users recog- nise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. If you believe that this work infringes copyright please provide details by email to [email protected] Notice: Please note that this document may not be the Version of Record (i.e. published version) of the work. Author manuscript versions (as Sub- mitted for peer review or as Accepted for publication after peer review) can be identified by an absence of publisher branding and/or typeset appear- ance. If there is any doubt, please refer to the published source. https://doi.org/10.1111/head.13053 Genetics of Migraine: insights into the molecular basis of migraine disorders Heidi G. Sutherland, PhD and Lyn R. Griffiths, PhD Genomics Research Centre, Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, QUT, Musk Ave, Kelvin Grove, QLD 4059, Australia The authors declare no conflicts of interest. -
Histamine and Antihistaminics Chapter 11
Histamine and Antihistaminics Chapter 11 HISTAMINE Histamine, meaning ‘tissue amine’ (histos—tissue) is almost ubiquitously present in animal tissues and in certain plants, e.g. stinging nettle. Its pharmacology was studied in detail by Dale in the beginning of the 20th century when close parallelism was noted between its actions and the manifestations of certain allergic reactions. It was implicated as a mediator of hypersensitivity Fig. 11.1: Synthesis and degradation of histamine phenomena and tissue injury reactions. It is now MAO-Monoamine oxidase known to play important physiological roles. Histamine is present mostly within storage by Asch and Schild (1966) into H1 and H2 : those granules of mast cells. Tissues rich in histamine blocked by then available antihistamines were are skin, gastric and intestinal mucosa, lungs, liver labelled H1. Sir James Black (1972) developed and placenta. Nonmast cell histamine occurs in the first H2 blocker burimamide and confirmed brain, epidermis, gastric mucosa and growing this classification. A third H3 receptor, which regions. Turnover of mast cell histamine is slow, serves primarily as an autoreceptor controlling while that of nonmast cell histamine is fast. histamine release from neurones in brain was Histamine is also present in blood, most body identified in 1983. Though some selective H3 secretions, venoms and pathological fluids. agonists and antagonists have been produced, none has found any clinical application. Features of Synthesis, storage and destruction these 3 types of histaminergic receptor are Histamine is β imidazolylethylamine. It is compared in Table 11.1. synthesized locally from the amino acid histidine Molecular cloning has revealed yet another (H4) receptor and degraded rapidly by oxidation and methylation in 2001. -
Current Awareness in Clinical Toxicology Editors: Damian Ballam Msc and Allister Vale MD
Current Awareness in Clinical Toxicology Editors: Damian Ballam MSc and Allister Vale MD January 2017 CONTENTS General Toxicology 11 Metals 38 Management 21 Pesticides 39 Drugs 23 Chemical Warfare 41 Chemical Incidents & 33 Plants 41 Pollution Chemicals 33 Animals 42 CURRENT AWARENESS PAPERS OF THE MONTH 2015 Annual Report of the American Association of Poison Control Centers' National Poison Data System (NPDS): 33rd Annual Report Mowry JB, Spyker DA, Brooks DE, Zimmerman A, Schauben JL. Clin Toxicol 2016; 54: 924-1109. Introduction This is the 33rd Annual Report of the American Association of Poison Control Centers' (AAPCC) National Poison Data System (NPDS). As of 1 January 2015, 55 of the nation's poison centers (PCs) uploaded case data automatically to NPDS. The upload interval was 9.52 [7.40, 13.6] (median [25%, 75%]) minutes, creating a near real-time national exposure and information database and surveillance system. Methods We analyzed the case data tabulating specific indices from NPDS. The methodology was similar to that of previous years. Where changes were introduced, the differences are identified. Poison center cases with medical outcomes of death were evaluated by a team of medical and clinical toxicologist reviewers using an ordinal scale of 1-6 to assess the Relative Contribution to Fatality (RCF) of the exposure. Results In 2015, 2,792,130 closed encounters were logged by NPDS: 2,168,371 human exposures, 55,516 animal exposures, 560,467 information calls, 7657 human confirmed nonexposures, Current Awareness in Clinical Toxicology is produced monthly for the American Academy of Clinical Toxicology by the Birmingham Unit of the UK National Poisons Information Service, with contributions from the Cardiff, Edinburgh, and Newcastle Units. -
Supplementary Information for the Skeletal Muscle Molecular Clock Regulates Sarcomere Length Through Titin Splicing
Supplementary Information for The skeletal muscle molecular clock regulates sarcomere length through titin splicing Lance A. Riley, Xiping Zhang, Joseph M. Mijares, David W. Hammers, , Hailey R. Olafson, Ping Du, Collin M. Douglas, Siegfried Labeit, Eric T. Wang, and Karyn A. Esser Karyn A. Esser Email: [email protected] This PDF file includes: Tables S1 to S7 1 Table S1. Antibodies and concentrations used in this study. Antibody Source Concentration Rb anti-sarcomeric α-actinin (EP2529Y) Abcam 1:1000 Rb anti-titin N2A Myomedix 1:250 Rb anti-titin Z1Z2 Myomedix 1:100 Rb anti-RBM20 Myomedix 1:500 Ms anti-γ-tubulin (T6557) Sigma 1:1000 Rt anti-HA High Affinity (11867423001) Roche 1:1000 Gt anti-rabbit Alexa Fluor 488 Thermo 1:500 Gt anti-rabbit Alexa Fluor 405 Thermo 1:500 Gt anti-rabbit Alexa Fluor 647 Thermo 1:500 Gt anti-rabbit IgG (H+L) HRP Sigma 1:10000 Gt anti-mouse IgG (H+L) HRP Sigma 1:10000 2 Table S2. RNA Integrity Values and number of reads sequenced for each sample used for RNAseq analysis. Sample Name RIN Read Number (Millions) M10 8.6 61.4 M11 8.3 58.6 M13 8.4 77.5 M15 8.9 69.3 M16 8.8 45.6 M17 8.7 59.8 3 Table S3. Primers used for plasmid generation and qRT-PCR. Sequence (5’ – 3’) Name GGGAGATCTTTAACAACATAGGAGCTGTGATTGGCTGT U7-BglII F AAACTGCAGCACAACGCGTTTCCTAGGAAACCA U7-PstI R GCTCTTTTAGAATTTTTGGAGCAGGTTTTCTGAC SDM U7smOpt F GTCAGAAAACCTGCTGGTTAAATTCTAAAAGAGC SDM U7smOpt R TTAGGGTGGGTGGATACGCCTCTGCAAAAGAATTTTTGGAGCAGGTTTTCTG Ttn-51-AS F TATCCACCCACCCTAAGTCCCTATCATAGCGGAAGTGCGTCTGTAG Ttn-51-AS R TAGGGTGCAAGGTACTCCTTAGAGTGAAAGAATTTTTGGAGCAGGTTT Ttn-89-AS F GTACCTTGCACCCTAAGTCCCTATCATAGCGGAAGTGCGTCTGTAG Ttn-89-AS R TGCATGCCCAGAAATGCCTGCT Rbm20 qPCR F AAAGGCCCTCGTTGGAATGGCT Rbm20 qPCR R CGAGTCCAGCGAGAGAAGG Rpl26 F GCAGTCTTTAATGAAAGCCGTG Rpl26 R CTAGGACGGAATCTGCTGTG Rbm20 Intron 1 F AACAGGGTGTCTGTCTGTCT Rbm20 Intron 1 R 4 Table S4. -
Supplementary Table 2
Supplementary Table 2. Differentially Expressed Genes following Sham treatment relative to Untreated Controls Fold Change Accession Name Symbol 3 h 12 h NM_013121 CD28 antigen Cd28 12.82 BG665360 FMS-like tyrosine kinase 1 Flt1 9.63 NM_012701 Adrenergic receptor, beta 1 Adrb1 8.24 0.46 U20796 Nuclear receptor subfamily 1, group D, member 2 Nr1d2 7.22 NM_017116 Calpain 2 Capn2 6.41 BE097282 Guanine nucleotide binding protein, alpha 12 Gna12 6.21 NM_053328 Basic helix-loop-helix domain containing, class B2 Bhlhb2 5.79 NM_053831 Guanylate cyclase 2f Gucy2f 5.71 AW251703 Tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily, member 12a Tnfrsf12a 5.57 NM_021691 Twist homolog 2 (Drosophila) Twist2 5.42 NM_133550 Fc receptor, IgE, low affinity II, alpha polypeptide Fcer2a 4.93 NM_031120 Signal sequence receptor, gamma Ssr3 4.84 NM_053544 Secreted frizzled-related protein 4 Sfrp4 4.73 NM_053910 Pleckstrin homology, Sec7 and coiled/coil domains 1 Pscd1 4.69 BE113233 Suppressor of cytokine signaling 2 Socs2 4.68 NM_053949 Potassium voltage-gated channel, subfamily H (eag- Kcnh2 4.60 related), member 2 NM_017305 Glutamate cysteine ligase, modifier subunit Gclm 4.59 NM_017309 Protein phospatase 3, regulatory subunit B, alpha Ppp3r1 4.54 isoform,type 1 NM_012765 5-hydroxytryptamine (serotonin) receptor 2C Htr2c 4.46 NM_017218 V-erb-b2 erythroblastic leukemia viral oncogene homolog Erbb3 4.42 3 (avian) AW918369 Zinc finger protein 191 Zfp191 4.38 NM_031034 Guanine nucleotide binding protein, alpha 12 Gna12 4.38 NM_017020 Interleukin 6 receptor Il6r 4.37 AJ002942 -
Beyond Traditional Morphological Characterization of Lung
Cancers 2020 S1 of S15 Beyond Traditional Morphological Characterization of Lung Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: In Silico Study of Next-Generation Sequencing Mutations Analysis across the Four World Health Organization Defined Groups Giovanni Centonze, Davide Biganzoli, Natalie Prinzi, Sara Pusceddu, Alessandro Mangogna, Elena Tamborini, Federica Perrone, Adele Busico, Vincenzo Lagano, Laura Cattaneo, Gabriella Sozzi, Luca Roz, Elia Biganzoli and Massimo Milione Table S1. Genes Frequently mutated in Typical Carcinoids (TCs). Mutation Original Entrez Gene Gene Rate % eukaryotic translation initiation factor 1A X-linked [Source: HGNC 4.84 EIF1AX 1964 EIF1AX Symbol; Acc: HGNC: 3250] AT-rich interaction domain 1A [Source: HGNC Symbol;Acc: HGNC: 4.71 ARID1A 8289 ARID1A 11110] LDL receptor related protein 1B [Source: HGNC Symbol; Acc: 4.35 LRP1B 53353 LRP1B HGNC: 6693] 3.53 NF1 4763 NF1 neurofibromin 1 [Source: HGNC Symbol;Acc: HGNC: 7765] DS cell adhesion molecule like 1 [Source: HGNC Symbol; Acc: 2.90 DSCAML1 57453 DSCAML1 HGNC: 14656] 2.90 DST 667 DST dystonin [Source: HGNC Symbol;Acc: HGNC: 1090] FA complementation group D2 [Source: HGNC Symbol; Acc: 2.90 FANCD2 2177 FANCD2 HGNC: 3585] piccolo presynaptic cytomatrix protein [Source: HGNC Symbol; Acc: 2.90 PCLO 27445 PCLO HGNC: 13406] erb-b2 receptor tyrosine kinase 2 [Source: HGNC Symbol; Acc: 2.44 ERBB2 2064 ERBB2 HGNC: 3430] BRCA1 associated protein 1 [Source: HGNC Symbol; Acc: HGNC: 2.35 BAP1 8314 BAP1 950] capicua transcriptional repressor [Source: HGNC Symbol; Acc: 2.35 CIC 23152 CIC HGNC: -
Comprehensive Analysis of the Expression of Sodium/Potassium-Atpase Α Subunits and Prognosis of Ovarian Serous Cystadenocarcinoma
Comprehensive Analysis of the Expression of Sodium/Potassium-ATPase α Subunits and Prognosis of Ovarian Serous Cystadenocarcinoma Wei Huang Tumor Hospital of Harbin Medical University Yongjian Zhang Tumor Hospital of Harbin Medical University Ye Xu Tumor Hospital of Harbin Medical University Shaoyou Yang Tumor Hospital of Harbin Medical University Bing Li Tumor Hospital of Harbin Medical University Lan Huang Tumor Hospital of Harbin Medical University Ge Lou ( [email protected] ) Tumor Hospital of Harbin Medical University https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6617-4482 Primary research Keywords: Adenosine triphosphate, ovary, cystadenocarcinoma, gynecology, gene expression Posted Date: June 22nd, 2020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-23702/v2 License: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Read Full License Version of Record: A version of this preprint was published on July 14th, 2020. See the published version at https://doi.org/10.1186/s12935-020-01414-5. Page 1/21 Abstract Background: Ovarian serous cystadenocarcinoma (OSC) is the most common and lethal gynecological cancer in women worldwide; however, biomarkers to diagnose and predict prognosis of OSC remain limited. Therefore, the present study aimed to investigate whether sodium/potassium adenosine triphosphate (Na+/K+-ATP)ase α-subunits (ATP1As) are helpful diagnostic and prognostic markers of OSC. Methods: Gene expression data (RNA-Seq) of 376 patients with OSC were downloaded from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) program database. Additional databases used in our analysis included the Gene Expression Omnibus, International Cancer Genome Consortium, Genotype–Tissue Expression, the Human Protein Atlas, cBioPortal for Cancer Genomics, and Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia.