DOCSLIB.ORG

Fiscal Year 2022 Local Budget Act of 2021”

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA C O M M I T T E E O F T H E WHOLE COMMITTEE REPORT 1350 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20004 DRAFT TO: All Councilmembers FROM: Chairman Phil Mendelson Committee of the Whole DATE: July 20, 2021 SUBJECT: Report on Bill 24-275, the “Fiscal Year 2022 Local Budget Act of 2021” The Committee of the Whole, to which Bill 24-275 was referred, reports favorably thereon as amended and recommends approval by the Council. This legislation establishes the operating expenditures and capital budget authority for the District for Fiscal Year (FY) 2022. The Committee adopts the fiscal recommendations set forth by the 10 committees on the “Fiscal Year 2022 Local Budget Act of 2021” and the “Fiscal Year 2022 Federal Portion Budget Request Act of 2021” and the spending allocations for the respective agencies under the committees’ direct purview, except where the Committee has modified the recommendations through superseding actions as set forth below.1 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. BACKGROUND AND NEED .................................................................................. ……………….2 Status of the District of Columbia ................................................................................................... ……………….2 Housing and Homeless Services Investments ...................................................... ………………5 Human Support Services ....................................................................................... ………………7 Public Education .................................................................................................... ………………8 Public Safety and Justice ........................................................................................ ……………..11 Economic Development and Regulation .............................................................. ……………..13 Operations and Infrastructure .............................................................................. ……………..15 Governmental Direction and Support .................................................................. ……………..16 II. OPERATING BUDGET CHARTS ....................................................................... ………………20 1 The following information is from the Fiscal Year 2022 budget as proposed by the Committee of the Whole for markup. Budget allocations may change at first and second reading of Bill 24-275. For the final Fiscal Year 2022 budget allocations or for committee specific information, please see the Fiscal Year 2022 Summary Reports, (located on the D.C. Council Office of the Budget Director’s website, https://www.dccouncilbudget.com/) or the committee reports provided by each committee, (available as part of the legislative history of B24-0275, available in the Legislative Information Management System, https://lims.dccouncil.us/) Committee of the Whole July 20, 2021 DRAFT Report on Bill 24-275 Page 2 III. CAPITAL BUDGET ........................................................................................................ ………………20 IV. LEGISLATIVE CHRONOLOGY .......................................................................... ………………22 V. POSITION OF THE EXECUTIVE .................................................................... ………………22 VI. COMMENTS OF ADVISORY NEIGHBORHOOD COMMISSIONS ….23 VII. COMMENTS FROM THE NATIONAL CAPITAL PLANNING COMMISSION .................................................................................................................... ………………24 VIII. LIST OF WITNESSES .................................................................................................. ………………24 IX. IMPACT ON EXISTING LAW ............................................................................. ………………28 X. FISCAL IMPACT .............................................................................................................. ………………28 XI. SECTION - BY- SECTION ANALYSIS .............................................................. ………………29 XII.COMMITTEE ACTION .............................................................................................. ………………29 XIII. ATTACHMENTS ............................................................................................................... ………………29 I. BACKGROUND AND NEED Section 442 of the “District of Columbia Home Rule Act,” approved December 24, 1973 (87 Stat. 798; D.C. Official Code § 1-204.42), requires the Mayor to prepare and submit to the Council an annual budget for the District, which the Council must adopt by act within 70 days after receipt.2 On December 1, 2020, the Council adopted Resolution 23-610, the “Fiscal Year 2022 Budget Submission Requirements Resolution of 2020.” The resolution established March 31, 2021 as the date by when the Mayor was required to transmit to the Council her proposed Fiscal Year 2022 budget. However, the budget transmission date was postponed twice, first to April 22, 20213 and then to May 27, 2021, to provide the time necessary for the executive to include the federal payments made available through the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) federal payment according to its May 10, 2021 guidance.4 On May 27, 2021, the Mayor transmitted Bill 24-275, along with supporting legislation in the form of Bill 24-285, the “Fiscal Year 2022 Budget Support Act of 2021,” and Bill 24-276, the “Fiscal Year 2022 Federal Portion Budget Request Act of 2021.” Status of the District of Columbia Against a backdrop of a global pandemic, social justice movements, and other significant events, the District’s Fiscal Year 2022 Budget and Financial Plan allocates resources to address 2 Section 446 of the Home Rule Act (D.C. Official Code § 1-204.46). 3 Section 903 of the Coronavirus Support Emergency Amendment Act of 2021, effective March 17, 2021 (D.C. Act 24-30; 68 DCR 3101). 4 Resolution 24-76, effective April 6, 2021. Committee of the Whole July 20, 2021 DRAFT Report on Bill 24-275 Page 3 District residents’ most urgent and immediate needs: provides supports to residents and businesses hardest hit by COVID-19; reallocates funds from policing to community-based interventions; invests in education, health care access, and housing; strengthens the social safety net; and opens new opportunities to businesses. In response to the global COVID-19 pandemic, Mayor Muriel Bowser declared a public health emergency on March 11, 2020, which was still in effect at the issuance of this report.5 In the 16 months since, more than 216,000 residents have applied for unemployment.6 At the same time that residents’ need for social safety net services skyrocketed, the District’s tax revenues plummeted. In April 2020, the Office of the Chief Financial Officer (OCFO) lowered the District’s predicted revenue by $721.8 million in FY 2020 and $773.6 million in FY 2021; and initially forecasted that it would take three years for revenues to recover to the FY 2019 baseline.7 Fortunately, a decade’s worth of economic prosperity, strong tax revenues, and sizable reserves has allowed the District to better weather the storm than many jurisdictions. The OCFO’s September 2020 and May 2021 revenue estimates showed noteworthy improvement in the District’s economy. The September 2020 forecast increased the FY 2020 estimated revenue by $222.1 million and showed only a reduction of $212 million in FY 2021, as compared to the April 2020 forecast.8 The May 2021 forecast also showed improvements in revenue growth and estimated that revenue should recover to the FY 2019 level ($8.3 billion) by FY 2022.9 In response to the nationwide coronavirus crisis, the federal government also enacted several bills to address the unprecedented challenges presented by the pandemic to states, local governments, residents, small businesses, and essential workers. The table below details the total funds provided to the District from each of the relevant acts. Federal Legislation Grants Allocated to D.C. State Aid Allocated to D.C. Coronavirus Preparedness and Response $9.2 million -- Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2020 Families First Coronavirus Response Act $89.1 million -- Executive Action $146 million -- Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic $1.4 billion $495.1 million Security Act (CARES Act) Paycheck Protection Program and Health $88.2 million -- Care Enhancement Act 5 Mayor’s Order 2020-045, Mayor’s Order 2020-046, and Mayor’s Order 2021-069. 6 D.C. Department of Employment Services (16 July 2021). Unemployment Compensation Claims Data. Retrieved from https://does.dc.gov/publication/unemployment-compensation-claims-data 7 D.C. Chief Financial Officer (2020). April 2020 Revenue Estimates. OCFO Retrieved from https://cfo.dc.gov/sites/default/files/dc/sites/ocfo/publication/attachments/April%20Revenue%20Estimate%20Letter% 20042420.pdf 8 D.C. Chief Financial Officer (2020). September 2020 Revenue Estimates. OCFO Retrieved from https://cfo.dc.gov/sites/default/files/dc/sites/ocfo/publication/attachments/Revenue%20Estimate%20Letter%20093020. pdf 9 D.C. Chief Financial Officer (2020). May 2021 Revenue Estimates. OCFO Retrieved from https://cfo.dc.gov/sites/default/files/dc/sites/ocfo/publication/attachments/May%202021%20Revised%20Revenue%20 Estimates%20for%20FY%202022%20-%202025_0.pdf Committee of the Whole July 20, 2021 DRAFT Report on Bill 24-275 Page 4 Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021 $1.0 billion -- American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 $1.3 billion $2.3 billion TOTAL $6.9 billion $2.8 billion The pandemic further highlighted the significant inequities facing communities of color in the United States, and here in the District. Rarely have
Recommended publications
  • Dc Homeowners' Property Taxes Remain Lowest in The

    Dc Homeowners' Property Taxes Remain Lowest in The

    An Affiliate of the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities 820 First Street NE, Suite 460 Washington, DC 20002 (202) 408-1080 Fax (202) 408-8173 www.dcfpi.org February 27, 2009 DC HOMEOWNERS’ PROPERTY TAXES REMAIN LOWEST IN THE REGION By Katie Kerstetter This week, District homeowners will receive their assessments for 2010 and their property tax bills for 2009. The new assessments are expected to decline modestly, after increasing significantly over the past several years. The new assessments won’t impact homeowners’ tax bills until next year, because this year’s bills are based on last year’s assessments. Yet even though 2009’s tax bills are based on a period when average assessments were rising, this analysis shows that property tax bills have decreased or risen only moderately for many homeowners in recent years. DC homeowners continue to enjoy the lowest average property tax bills in the region, largely due to property tax relief policies implemented in recent years. These policies include a Homestead Deduction1 increase from $30,000 to $67,500; a 10 percent cap on annual increases in taxable assessments; and an 11-cent property tax rate cut. The District also adopted a “calculated rate” provision that decreases the tax rate if property tax collections reach a certain target. As a result of these measures, most DC homeowners have seen their tax bills fall — or increase only modestly — over the past four years. In 2008, DC homeowners paid lower property taxes on average than homeowners in surrounding counties. Among homes with an average sales price of $500,000, DC homeowners paid an average tax of $2,725, compared to $3,504 in Montgomery County, $4,752 in PG County, and over $4,400 in Arlington and Fairfax counties.
  • Budget Letter

    Budget Letter

    February 28, 2019 The Honorable Muriel Bowser Mayor of the District of Columbia 1350 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Suite 300 Washington, DC 20002 Re: Fiscal Year 2020 Budget Proposal Dear Mayor Bowser: As you prepare your Fiscal Year 2020 (“FY20”) proposed budget, I would like to highlight a few Ward 5 priorities and request that you consider funding them in FY20. Last year, your Fair Shot budget made critical investments essential to Ward 5 residents such as supporting $20 million in funding for a new Lamond-Riggs library; $500,000 for new Main Streets and Clean Teams along South Dakota/Riggs Road and Bladensburg; and $300,000 for the design and creation of a statue of native Washingtonian and civil rights leader, Charles Hamilton Houston. Our Ward 5 FY20 budget is about making the District equitable and inclusive for all. From investing in affordable housing to keep residents in their homes to expanding behavioral health and trauma informed services, together, our Ward 5 FY20 budget requests moves the District towards real achievable and equitable results. Further, our Ward 5 budget represents feedback gathered from residents during my Ward 5 Budget Engagement Forum, and consideration of over 300 hours of Advisory Neighborhood Commission (ANC) and civic association meetings. 1. Affordable Housing Affordable housing remains one of the highest priorities of Ward 5 residents. With your leadership and the support of the Council, we have made critical investments in the Housing Production Trust Fund, adjusted amounts for HPAP, and other important steps to ensure housing affordability. However, the Washington Post just reported that “[i]ncome inequality is rising so fast… that data can’t keep up”.
  • General Order

    General Order

    GENERAL ORDER Title Snow Emergency Series / Number GO–OPS–803.02 Effective Date Distribution October 17, 2003 B Replaces / Rescinds General Order 803.02 (Snow Emergency) DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA I. Background………..…....Page 1 III. Regulations…………………….Page 1 II. Policy………………….....Page 1 IV. Procedural Guidelines………..Page 3 I. BACKGROUND The Metropolitan Police Department (MPD), in conjunction with the Department of Public Works (DPW), has established guidelines for traffic control and mobilization during severe inclement weather. MPD has established policies and procedures to be utilized during severe inclement weather and/or snow emergencies and snow chain installation. II. POLICY The policy of the Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) is to work closely with DPW and other government agencies, during severe and inclement weather and snow emergencies, to maintain traffic control and flow, remove stalled or abandoned vehicles and to ensure that all streets marked as Snow Emergency Routes remain clear. (CALEA 61.3.2-d) III. REGULATIONS A. Severe Inclement Weather Whenever snow, sleet or freezing rain is creating a condition that makes the operation of Department vehicles difficult, and in the estimation of the Field Commander or EAC that road conditions are hazardous, the following procedures shall be adhered to when the District Watch Commander observes, or is notified of deteriorating weather (snow, sleet, or ice) conditions that cause adverse driving conditions, he/she shall monitor and advise the Synchronized Operations Command Center (SOCC). B. The SOCC shall keep the Field Commander and/or EAC advised of the status of road conditions and the possibility of snow chain installation. 1. The Field Commander and/or EAC shall make the decision to install snow chains.
  • District Columbia

    District Columbia

    PUBLIC EDUCATION FACILITIES MASTER PLAN for the Appendices B - I DISTRICT of COLUMBIA AYERS SAINT GROSS ARCHITECTS + PLANNERS | FIELDNG NAIR INTERNATIONAL TABLE OF CONTENTS APPENDIX A: School Listing (See Master Plan) APPENDIX B: DCPS and Charter Schools Listing By Neighborhood Cluster ..................................... 1 APPENDIX C: Complete Enrollment, Capacity and Utilization Study ............................................... 7 APPENDIX D: Complete Population and Enrollment Forecast Study ............................................... 29 APPENDIX E: Demographic Analysis ................................................................................................ 51 APPENDIX F: Cluster Demographic Summary .................................................................................. 63 APPENDIX G: Complete Facility Condition, Quality and Efficacy Study ............................................ 157 APPENDIX H: DCPS Educational Facilities Effectiveness Instrument (EFEI) ...................................... 195 APPENDIX I: Neighborhood Attendance Participation .................................................................... 311 Cover Photograph: Capital City Public Charter School by Drew Angerer APPENDIX B: DCPS AND CHARTER SCHOOLS LISTING BY NEIGHBORHOOD CLUSTER Cluster Cluster Name DCPS Schools PCS Schools Number • Oyster-Adams Bilingual School (Adams) Kalorama Heights, Adams (Lower) 1 • Education Strengthens Families (Esf) PCS Morgan, Lanier Heights • H.D. Cooke Elementary School • Marie Reed Elementary School
  • Shepherd Park News

    Shepherd Park News

    Shepherd Park News A quarterly newsletter for residents of Shepherd Park, Colonial Village and North Portal Estates Newsletter of the Shepherd Park Citizens Association Spring 2003 Calendar Message From The President MAY 6—ANC 4A meeting, 7:15 p.m., “Dedicated to improving the quality of life for all members of the Shepherd Park community Ft. Stevens Rec Center through programs and activities that focus on safe and clean streets, regular communication *10—SPCA Community among community members, responsiveness to community concerns, economic development that Cleanup, 9 a.m.–noon benefits our community, proactive involvement in relevant business and political matters, and 10— PSA 401 meeting, support of Shepherd Elementary School.” 11 a.m., Sh. Pk. Library th 15— MPD 4 District Citizens This is the SPCA Mission Statement that, along with the goals for 2003/4 and the committees Advisory Council, 7 p.m., th and chairs charged with achieving those goals, were presented and unanimously accepted at our 4 District Police Station March 12 community meeting. (A list of the committees and their chairs is on page 2.) And what 16 & 17— Music Man, 7 p.m., & a successful meeting it was! We anticipated a turnout of about 50 residents; instead, almost three 18 at 3 p.m., Shepherd ES times that number came, and many became SPCA members or volunteered either to be block 20 & 22— Nat’l Park Service captains or to participate in other community activities. If you haven’t already volunteered, take hearings on Beach Dr. a look at the list of committees and see if there’s an area where you could help support our closings, 6–10 p.m., UDC community.
  • Housing in the Nation's Capital

    Housing in the Nation's Capital

    Housing in the Nation’s2005 Capital Foreword . 2 About the Authors. 4 Acknowledgments. 4 Executive Summary . 5 Introduction. 12 Chapter 1 City Revitalization and Regional Context . 15 Chapter 2 Contrasts Across the District’s Neighborhoods . 20 Chapter 3 Homeownership Out of Reach. 29 Chapter 4 Narrowing Rental Options. 35 Chapter 5 Closing the Gap . 43 Endnotes . 53 References . 56 Appendices . 57 Prepared for the Fannie Mae Foundation by the Urban Institute Margery Austin Turner G. Thomas Kingsley Kathryn L. S. Pettit Jessica Cigna Michael Eiseman HOUSING IN THE NATION’S CAPITAL 2005 Foreword Last year’s Housing in the Nation’s Capital These trends provide cause for celebration. adopted a regional perspective to illuminate the The District stands at the center of what is housing affordability challenges confronting arguably the nation’s strongest regional econ- Washington, D.C. The report showed that the omy, and the city’s housing market is sizzling. region’s strong but geographically unbalanced But these facts mask a much more somber growth is fueling sprawl, degrading the envi- reality, one of mounting hardship and declining ronment, and — most ominously — straining opportunity for many District families. Home the capacity of working families to find homes price escalation is squeezing families — espe- they can afford. The report provided a portrait cially minority and working families — out of of a region under stress, struggling against the city’s housing market. Between 2000 and forces with the potential to do real harm to 2003, the share of minority home buyers in the the quality of life throughout the Washington District fell from 43 percent to 37 percent.
  • August 16, 2021 FREE AT-HOME COVID-19 TESTING KITS 2

    August 16, 2021 FREE AT-HOME COVID-19 TESTING KITS 2

    Monday, August 16, 2021 FREE AT-HOME COVID-19 TESTING KITS 2 The Test Yourself DC Program offers the option to either take a COVID-19 test on site at one of the 16 locations or to drop off a test sample at the closest DC Library drop box. PICK-UP AND DROP-OFF LOCATIONS More sites Ward 1 Cleveland Park Ward 6 Ward 8 coming soon. Mt. Pleasant 310 Connecticut Avenue NW Shaw | Watha T. Daniel Anacostia 3160 16th Street NW 1630 7th Street NW 1800 Good Hope Road SE Tenley-Friendship Ward 2 4450 Wisconsin Avenue NW Ward 7 Bellevue | William O. Lockridge Georgetown Benning (Dorothy I. Height) 115 Atlantic Street SW 3260 R Street NW Ward 4 3935 Benning Road NE Petworth Pickup free at-home testing kits MLK Central Library 4200 Kansas Avenue NW Capitol View Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, 901 G Street NW 5001 Central Avenue SE Friday, and Saturday from 10am-6pm Shepherd Park | Juanita E. and on Thursday from 12pm - 6pm West End Thornton Francis A. Gregory Drop off samples seven days a week 2301 L Street NW 7420 Georgia Avenue NW 3660 Alabama Avenue SE (same day as administered) by 8pm Ward 3 Ward 5 Learn more at testyourself.dc.gov Chevy Chase Woodridge 5625 Connecticut Avenue NW 1801 Hamlin Street NE August 16, 2021 WHERE WE ARE TODAY 3 August 16, 2021 DAILY CASE RATE 4 August 16, 2021 VACCINATED VS UNVACCINATED 5 While we are seeing a relatively small number of breakthrough cases, the increase in the daily case rate is primarily driven by people who are not fully vaccinated.
  • Washington, DC

    Washington, DC

    HOUSES UNFURNISHED. HOUSES UNFURNISHED. HOUSES FOR SALE. (Continued.) _HOUSES FOR SALE. HOUSES FOR SALE. HOUSIS FOR SALE. COLORED—No. S. 8 ALEXANDRIA CT. (Continued.) HOUSES FOR SALE. HOUSES FOR SALE. HOMES NEAR WOODRIDGE. SEE THIS PRETTY HOME. BEAUTIFUL N.W. 4 Rooms. $15. FOXHALL VILLAGE. SHEPHERD PARK—CAN BE PURCHASED 2812 Hamlin St. N.E.—*5,500. Open; 5024 Illinois n.w.: 7 rms. lncl. 3932 LEGATION ATTRACTIVE Lovely home lor small family; BRODIE A COLBERT. INC., NATL. 8875. 200» 2flth St. ST.* BUNGALOW. WOODRIDGE SPECIALS. perfect for $12,500. owner transferred from city. N.E.—*0,500. porch; arranged 2 families; gar. Qeo. 1122. CHEVY CHASE. D. C. 2«U2 eond.; large llv. rm. with -800 30th HAMLIN ST. N.E. house fireplace, din COLORED—5100 FITCH BT. N E._ 2-story brick, highest elevation. 0 rooms. 3 St. N.E.—*6,600. Home of unuiual charm, well conatructed. Beautiful 3 baths, big lot. only rm modern kit. 2 2849 Monroe 5-room and bath bungalow. large bedrms.. tiled Charming 5-rm. bungalow, excellent condi- large bedrooms, breakfast room. 2 complete St. N.E.—*0.050. roomy, large porches; lot 60x140; oil Attic, front garage bargain at bath. 2 screened tion: WM. R. WEST D. C. porch, large lot; near school 2- roo,mi porches, gar.; auto, heat electricity: nice situation: acre ol baths, automatic oil heat, built-in garage, .... THOROWGOOD, WOODRIDGE, heat, 2-car close to shopping center and stores. bouses for rent. H. C. refrigeration. D. R. I. Ave. N.E. garage; Bargain. Price. $5,600.
  • Racism DELEGATION at ARMS MEETING Here E Street Northeast to Street Words

    Racism DELEGATION at ARMS MEETING Here E Street Northeast to Street Words

    BRITISH WAR MOTHERS TO U. S. NOTED JAPANESE PEACE ADVOCATE HONQR1 Sun to Skin* on Burial UNKNOWN DEAD. * HERE Of Unknown Smldier, PAYS TRIBUTE TO WOMAN SUFFRAGE FINEARTSBODY «£ CAMS Say« Weatker Bureau il The mmm will shine en the burial of America's iiknma Midler, AratUtlee 4mJ, the FORHEROFUNERAL Weather Bureau Indicated to- 4u> Fair and eel# weather wHI replace the rain tomorrow and Announces Victoria Cross Men Bear continue FtMar. Uwllf al¬ Several Important Improve¬ Superintendent ? most perfect weather eeadltioaa for the procession from the ments in D. C. Will Be Con¬ Winter's Wreaths for Grave of Capitol to Arlington and the Regulations ceremonies, the weather man .aid. sidered Commission. tr and Routings. Unknown One. by The Fine Arts Commission will meet j The winter schedule of ash collec- Two Canadian non-commissioned and Saturday of this week, effect Mon- the USE BETTY LEHMAN FLAG Friday t tions, which will go into j officers, both Victoria Cross men, ivhen various important matters con¬ day. was made public today by Morris highest honor paid by the British for of the of street TO HONOR AMERICA'S DEAD cerning the activities commis¬ Hacker, superintendent valor, arrived in Washington this sion will be disposed of. The first cleaning and city refuse. morning, carrying wreaths from the neeting has been called for 9 o'clock Every householder is requested to Canadian government to be laid on Emblem Known as D. C. Tribute find out from the schedule the days the grave of the unknown dead at n the quarters of the commission in on which the wagon will visit b|s Arlington Friday.
  • 2015 Final Report Part 2

    2015 Final Report Part 2

    04 ALTERNATIVES ASSESSMENT Alternatives Assessment 4.0 EVALUATIONCONTENT HEADING OF ALTERNATIVES A comparative evaluation was conducted for all between 30 and 35 mph and 85% at speeds Auto Speeds 2, 3 alternatives to assess their individual impacts to greater than 40 mph. As documented previously, auto speeds can the street network and users, all framed by the • Wider travel lane widths are shown to be influenced by a number of design factors, stated project needs. The following elements have a direct correlation to higher vehicle including travel lane width, excess roadway were all assessed through a range of measures, speeds4, which in turn, increases the capacity, signal progression, and roadway both quantitatively and qualitatively, to provide a likelihood of crashes and crash severity. friction (i.e., elements along the edges of the comprehensive perspective on each Alternative. roadway that provide a sense of a more confined A detailed matrix is provided at the end of The perception of safety is a key consideration when assessing the safety of pedestrians and operating space). As comparisons are made this section to compare Alternatives based on between Alternatives to determine potential project needs. bicyclists along a roadway and at intersections. If these users do not feel safe, then regardless impacts to speed (i.e., which Alternative would Safety of available crash data results, the facility is not result in higher speeds versus which Alternative Corridor safety for all users includes a range considered safe. Including improved pedestrian would result in lower speeds), the two biggest of considerations, including auto speeds, and bicycle amenities can improve the safety factors affecting speed are the number of travel adequate sidewalk width and crossing facilities for these users, including wider sidewalks, lanes and the presence of parked vehicles.
  • Neighborhood Cluster (NC)

    Neighborhood Cluster (NC)

    2014 Population Projections and Growth (between 2014 to 2020) by Neighborhood Cluster Office of Office of Office of % change in projected % change in projected % change in projected % change in projected Office of Planning's Planning's Planning's Planning's number of 0-3 year number of number of number of 14-17 year Neighborhood Cluster Population Cluster Names Ward Population Population Population olds per 4-10 year olds per 11-13 year olds per olds per (NC) Forecast in 2014 Forecast in 2014 Forecast in 2014 Forecast in 2014 neighborhood cluster neighborhood cluster neighborhood cluster neighborhood cluster (Ages 4-10) (Ages 0-3) (Ages 11-13) (Ages 14-17) 2014_2020 2014_2020 2014_2020 2014_2020 Citywide 36,910 44,227 15,577 20,296 12% 47% 32% 12% Kalorama Heights, Cluster 1 Adams Morgan and Ward1 & 2 981 752 179 181 18% 136% 98% 50% Columbia Heights, Mt. Pleasant, Pleasant Cluster 2 Plains and Park View Ward 1 3,506 3,267 1,044 1,251 -1% 78% 45% 27% Howard University, Le Droit Park and Cluster 3 Cardozo/Shaw Ward 1,2 & 6 565 478 116 167 32% 120% 102% 6% Georgetown and Cluster 4 Burleith/Hillandale Ward 2 650 919 243 262 89% 39% 72% 47% West End, Foggy Cluster 5 Bottom, GWU Ward 2 350 213 30 23 161% 212% 207% 158% Dupont Circle and Connecticut Avenue/K Cluster 6 Street Ward 1 & 2 608 428 71 81 55% 169% 167% 65% Cluster 7 Shaw and Logan Circle Ward 2 & 6 958 890 262 316 15% 90% 58% 27% Downtown, Chinatown, Penn Quarters, Mount Vernon Square and Cluster 8 North Capitol Street Ward 2 & 6 876 967 300 371 24% 66% 66% 30% Southwest Employment
  • ~Ock Creek Park Di Trict of Columbia

    ~Ock Creek Park Di Trict of Columbia

    hi toric re ource tudy ~OCK CREEK PARK DI TRICT OF COLUMBIA ON P.11CROFf lM PlfASE RETURN TD: l[ CAL INR>RMATION COITER Co or ca . DOMR SERVICE CENTER rol 2-3/:;...cc -. NATIONAL. PARK SERVICE historic resource study august 1990 by William Bushong \ ROCK CREEK PARK • DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR I NATIONAL PARK SERVICE iii I e TABLE OF CONTENTS I ACKNOWLEDGEMENlS I ix PART I: HISTORY OF 1HE lAND AREA AND USES OF ROCK CREEK PARK. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. CHAPTER I: INTRODUCTION I 1 CHAPTER II: SUMMARY OF THE PREHISTORY AND HISTORY OF WASHINGTON, D.C. PRIOR TO 1790. I 7 Aboriginal Inhabitants, European Contact. and Trade. I 8 Settlement and Development of Towns in the Washington Area. I 12 NOTES I 19 CHAPfER III: "ROCK CREEK IN OLDEN DAYS": TIIE HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT OF TIIE LAND AREA OF ROCK CREEK PARK. 1790-1890. I 22 Rock Creek Park in the L'Enfant-Ellicott Plan for the National Capital. I 23 The Settlement of Upper Rock Creek Before the Civil War. I 25 The Milling Industry Along Rock Creek. / 34 The Civil War Period, 1861-1865. I 40 Nineteenth Century Land Uses After 1865. / 46 NOTES I 52 CHAPTER IV: TIIE ESTABLISHMENT OF ROCK CREEK PARK. I 61 Legislative Background to the Creation of Rock Creek Park. I 63 The Rock Creek Park Commission. I 73 NOTES I 79 iv CHAPTERV: THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT OF ROCK CREEK PARK. 1890-1933. I 85 Years of Transition. I 85 Park Planning and the Centennial of the Nation's Capital.