The Biology of Australian Weeds 25. Lantana Camara L

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Biology of Australian Weeds 25. Lantana Camara L Plant Protection Quarterly Vol.10(2) 1995 82 In weedy forms about half of the flow- The Biology of Australian Weeds ers usually produce a single-seeded fleshy spherical fruit 5–7 mm in diameter, 25. Lantana camara L. at first hard and green but ripening to purple or black and then consisting of a J.T. SwarbrickA, B.W. WillsonB and M.A. Hannan-JonesB. thin skin containing a purple pulp around A Weed Science Consultancy, 15 Katoomba Crescent, Toowoomba, the stony, pear-shaped, 3–4 mm diameter Queensland 4350, Australia. seed. The non-weedy forms set very few fruits. Each seed contains one or some- B Alan Fletcher Research Station, PO Box 36, Sherwood, Queensland 4075, times two embryos, and in the latter case Australia. both may germinate. The root system typically consists of a short tap root with laterals, which divide Name repeatedly to form a root mat. Lantana Lantana camara was known by at least tall but capable of becoming a liane up to does not sucker from damaged or broken five polynomial descriptive names, start- 15 m tall if given support (Figure 1). roots, but will regrow vigorously from the ing with Lantana, Viburnum and The arching, scrambling or prostrate base of the stem and more slowly from Periclymenum, before Linnaeus gave it its stems are initially 4-angled but become rooted horizontal stems in contact with binomial name in 1753. He retained cylindrical and up to 15 cm thick with moist soil. Lantana (origin obscure) and described a age. Young stems are hairy and in the number of species including camara (a weedy forms carry sharp recurved prick- Variation within the species West Indian name) and aculeata (prickly), les along the angles, whilst those of the Lantana is an aggregate species, derived a species now included within the non-weedy forms are rounder, more slen- through horticultural and natural hy- L. camara complex (L. camara sensu lato). der and without prickles. bridization, selection and somatic muta- Linnaeus’ L. camara was non-prickly The opposite pairs of ovate leaves oc- tion from a number of similar and prob- whilst his L. aculeata was prickly; both cur on 1–3 cm long petioles. Each leaf is ably closely related (though spatially were described from European garden 3–10 cm long and 2–6 cm wide, with a separated) tropical American species. material (Schauer 1851). bluntly pointed, rounded or heart-shaped This has resulted in many hundreds of Lantana has become the common name base, finely toothed margin and bluntly forms, which are also referred to as for the most abundant and complex spe- pointed tip. The leaves are rough and cultivars and varieties (Howard 1969). cies within the genus. It contains several finely hairy on both surfaces and strongly The forms vary in ploidy, bush shape, hundred wild and cultivated forms. veined below, and have a strong charac- flower colour, prickliness, response to the teristic smell when crushed. The upper environment and natural enemies, and Description epidermis carries very few stomata. Both chemical composition, including toxicity Lantana is a brittle, much branched, the stomata and the trichomes from both to animals. At least 29 forms have become thicket-forming shrub, normally 2–4 m surfaces of leaves have been related to tax- naturalized in eastern Australia (Smith onomy (Raghavan and Arora and Smith 1982) and probably others in 1960, Shah and Mathew 1982). the Northern Territory and Western Aus- Inflorescences develop in the tralia. A number of non-weedy forms are axils of young leaves. They are sold by nurseries. Smith and Smith (1982) compact, flat to dome-shaped considered that 19 forms were sufficiently and 2–3 cm across and each is common in eastern Australia to be eco- supported by a finely hairy nomically important as either weeds or 2–8 cm long peduncle with a poisonous plants. club-shaped tip. Each inflores- The basic chromosome number of cence contains 20–40 sessile Lantana is 11, with 12 being the basic flowers, each subtended by a number for the rest of the genus stiff deciduous bract. The (Raghavan and Arora 1960). Diploid, flower buds are angular and triploid, tetraploid, pentaploid and tightly packed, and open from hexaploid forms of lantana have been re- the outside of the inflorescence ported in South Africa (Stirton 1977, Spies towards the centre. Each and Stirton 1982, Spies 1984), and triploid, flower has a 9–12 mm long tetraploid and pentaploid lantanas in In- tube and four unequal rounded dia (Sen and Sahni 1955). Raghavan and petals 4–8 mm across. Newly Arora (1962) showed that Indian diploids opened flowers normally have were small, stunted and very rare and yellow throats, and the petals that the weedy forms were mostly vary from white to cream, yel- tetraploids with some triploids. Koshoo low, pink, orange, red or pur- and Mahal (1967) claimed that the breed- ple. After pollination flowers ing system combines sexual, semisexual darken, lose the yellow centre and asexual (apomictic) systems, and and fall, except in non-weedy Stirton (1977) stated that polyploidy has forms which mostly fail to set developed through both auto- and allo- seed and retain their flowers polyploidy. longer. Pollen grains are al- Most of the weedy forms of lantana in most globular, tricolpate and South Africa and India and probably Aus- 30–35 µm across and are finely tralia appear to be tetraploids, whilst most Figure 1. Lantana (Lantana camara L.) (Line textured (d’Almeida and of the non-weedy ornamental forms ap- drawing by Dr. G. Scott). Roland-Heydacker 1985). pear to be triploids. 83 Plant Protection Quarterly Vol.10(2) 1995 After growing many weedy forms of larger bushes, longer internodes and leaf Adelaide (Bailey 1841), and was followed lantana together in South Africa to study blades, prickly stems and high levels of by many others. The plant was quickly their cytology and the morphology of fruit production, whereas most of the or- spread northwards along the coast, with their inflorescences, bracts and flowers, namental forms produced smaller the first Australian collections of appar- Spies (1984) concluded that ‘plants on dif- bushes, had shorter internodes and ently naturalized lantanas from the Bris- ferent ploidy levels are morphologically leaves, lacked prickles, and while produc- bane River in 1861 and near Sydney in similar’. A similar study of Indian plants ing similar numbers of flowers, set very 1862 (Swarbrick 1985). By 1897 lantana by Natarajan and Ahuja (1957) showed few fruit. The ornamental form ‘Drap d’or’ was described as being ‘a huge rambling that non-prickly forms occurred at 2n, 3n occupied an anomalous position since it shrub and a most troublesome weed and 4n levels, flower colour varied within showed the large bush size, long which has spread to an alarming extent, all ploidy levels, and all ploidy levels con- internodes and large leaves of the weedy and forms impenetrable thickets on the tained forms with both nil and good seed group but the lack of prickles and low banks of streams, deserted farms and the set. seed production of the ornamental group, edges of scrubs’ in the Brisbane area and Tandon and Bali (1955) compared dip- suggesting significant differences in its as being ‘equally abundant about Port loid and triploid forms and found that the derivation from both other ornamental Jackson’ (Bailey 1897). Lantana appears to latter was more vigorous, had larger and and weedy forms. have been grown in Western Australia by darker leaves, produced more and larger 1875 (Swarbrick 1985) but may have only flowers and, unlike the diploid, was largely History spread to the Northern Territory during sterile. Raghavan and Arora (1960) found Lantana was probably first introduced or since the Second World War (I.L. Miller no correlations between flower colour or into Europe about 1640 from Brazil personal communication). Further expan- lower leaf epidermal patterns and five (Howard 1969), where both prickly and sion into previously unoccupied areas is levels of ploidy. non-prickly taxa are considered to be na- probably still occurring, often assisted by Swarbrick (unpublished) compared the tive, common and widespread (Schauer land clearing or other human disturbance morphology of seven weedy forms from 1851). Introductions continued through- (Humphries and Stanton 1992). Smith’s collection at the CSIRO in Bris- out the 17th, 18th and 19th centuries bane (now destroyed) and six ornamental (Swarbrick 1985) resulting in an aggre- Geographical distribution forms from commercial nurseries under gate species of mixed parentage (Howard uniform conditions in south-eastern 1969, Stirton 1977). Lantana became a fa- Australia Queensland. He studied bush volume, vourite hothouse plant in Europe in the Lantana is widely distributed throughout average length of the third internode from late 19th century, with 397 new varietal coastal and subcoastal areas from the shoot tip, average length of fourth names being added to nurserymen’s cata- Ulladulla in New South Wales to Cape node leaves, average number of prickles logues between 1850 and 1900 (Howard Melville in Queensland, with very scat- per 5 cm of angle on the third internode 1969). Many of these forms would have tered infestations in the Northern Terri- and average number of flowers and fruits been distributed to the colonies, including tory, Western and South Australia (Figure per inflorescence. Analysis of results Australia. 2). It is also present as a weed on both showed that the weedy forms were all The first Australian record of lantana Lord Howe and Norfolk Islands very similar and were characterized by was in 1841 at the old Botanic Gardens in (Swarbrick 1985). Outside Australia Lantana is widely grown as an ornamen- tal shrub throughout the tropics, subtrop- ics and warm temperate zones.
Recommended publications
  • Biological Control of Lantana, Prickly Pear, and Hamakua Pamakani Inhawah: a Review and Update
    BIOLOGICAL CONTROL OF LANTANA, PRICKLY PEAR, AND HAMAKUA PAMAKANI INHAWAH: A REVIEW AND UPDATE Clifton J. Davis, Ernest Yoshioka, and Dina Kageler ABSTRACT The biological control of noxious weeds in Hawai`i has been carried on intermittently since 1902, when insects and diseases of lantana (Lantana camara) were sought in Mexico by the Territorial Board of Agriculture and Forestry (now Hawai`i Department of Agriculture). This approach was subsequently employed for the control of 20 other noxious weed pests between the 1940s and 1970s. Lantana was the first weed to be controlled by this method in the U.S. Results were very dramatic in some areas of the State, especially after later introductions by Hawai`ian and Australian entomologists resulted in heavy stress on lantana. In addition to lantana, excellent results have been obtained in the biological control of cacti (Opuntia spp.), and Hamakua pamakani (Ageratina riparia). Prior to the introduction of cactus insects in 1949, 66,000 a (26,400 ha) of Parker Ranch range lands on Hawai`i Island were infested with cacti. By 1965, 7,610 a (< 3,080 ha) remained infested, the result of three introduced insects and an accidentally introduced fungus disease; the red-fruited variety of cactus is particularly susceptible to the fungus. A spineless variety of the cactus occurs in the 'Ainahou-Poliokeawe Pali sector of Hawai`i Volcanoes National Park, and biocontrol efforts are in progress. With the introduction of insects from Mexico and a foliar fungus disease from Jamaica, Hamakua pamakani is under excellent control on many ranch as well as privately owned and government lands on Hawai`i Island.
    [Show full text]
  • Pu'u Wa'awa'a Biological Assessment
    PU‘U WA‘AWA‘A BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT PU‘U WA‘AWA‘A, NORTH KONA, HAWAII Prepared by: Jon G. Giffin Forestry & Wildlife Manager August 2003 STATE OF HAWAII DEPARTMENT OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF FORESTRY AND WILDLIFE TABLE OF CONTENTS TITLE PAGE ................................................................................................................................. i TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................................. ii GENERAL SETTING...................................................................................................................1 Introduction..........................................................................................................................1 Land Use Practices...............................................................................................................1 Geology..................................................................................................................................3 Lava Flows............................................................................................................................5 Lava Tubes ...........................................................................................................................5 Cinder Cones ........................................................................................................................7 Soils .......................................................................................................................................9
    [Show full text]
  • Chrysanthemoides Monilifera Ssp
    MANAGEMENT OF BONESEED (CHRYSANTHEMOIDES MONILIFERA SSP. MONILIFERA) (L.) T. NORL. USING FIRE, HERBICIDES AND OTHER TECHNIQUES IN AUSTRALIAN WOODLANDS Rachel L. Melland Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy School of Agriculture, Food and Wine University of Adelaide August 2007 Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS ....................................................................................................... II ABSTRACT ............................................................................................................................ VI DECLARATION ................................................................................................................ VIII ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .................................................................................................. IX CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................ 1 1.1 AIMS OF THIS THESIS .......................................................................................................... 3 CHAPTER 2: LITERATURE REVIEW ............................................................................... 5 2.1 PROCESSES OF NATIVE ECOSYSTEM DEGRADATION ............................................................ 5 2.2 GLOBAL PLANT INVASIONS – ECOSYSTEM DEGRADING PROCESSES .................................... 6 2.3 THE ENVIRONMENTAL WEED PROBLEM IN AUSTRALIA ..................................................... 10 2.4 CAUSES AND PROCESSES OF INVASIVENESS .....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of the United States National Museum
    Proceedings of the United States National Museum SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION • WASHINGTON, D.C. Volume 112 I960 Number 3431 LACE-BUG GENERA OF THE WORLD (HEMIPTERA: TINGIDAE) « By Carl J. Drake and Florence A. Ruhoff Introduction A treatise of the generic names of the family Tingidae from a global standpoint embodies problems similar to those frequently encountered in corresponding studies in other animal groups. The more im- portant criteria, including such basic desiderata as fixation of type species, synonyms, priority, and dates of technical publications implicate questions concomitant with recent trends toward the clarification and stabilization of zoological nomenclature. Zoogeography, predicated and authenticated on the generic level by the distribution of genera and species, is portrayed here by means of tables, charts, and maps of the tingifauna of the world. This visual pattern of distribution helps one to form a more vivid concept of the family and its hierarchic levels of subfamilies and genera. To a limited extent the data indicate distributional concentrations and probable centers of evolution and dispersal paths of genera. The phylogenetic relationship of genera is not discussed. The present treatise recognizes 216 genera (plus 79 synonyms, homonyms, and emendations) of the Tingidae of the world and gives 1 Research for this paper was supported In part by the National Science Foundation, grant No. 4095. 2 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM vol. 112 the figure of 1,767 as the approximate number of species now recog- nized. These figures, collated with similar categories in Lethierry and Severin (1896), show that there has been an increase of many genera and hundreds of species of Tingidae during the past three- quarters of a century.
    [Show full text]
  • Tingidae (Heteroptera) De Nicaragua
    ISSN 1021-0296 REVISTA NICARAGUENSE DE ENTOMOLOGIA N° 113. Diciembre 2016 Tingidae (Heteroptera) de Nicaragua. Por Jean-Michel Maes & Alex Knudson. PUBLICACIÓN DEL MUSEO ENTOMOLÓGICO ASOCIACIÓN NICARAGÜENSE DE ENTOMOLOGÍA LEON - - - NICARAGUA Revista Nicaragüense de Entomología. Número 113. 2016. La Revista Nicaragüense de Entomología (ISSN 1021-0296) es una publicación reconocida en la Red de Revistas Científicas de América Latina y el Caribe, España y Portugal (Red ALyC) e indexada en los índices: Zoological Record, Entomológical Abstracts, Life Sciences Collections, Review of Medical and Veterinary Entomology and Review of Agricultural Entomology. Los artículos de esta publicación están reportados en las Páginas de Contenido de CATIE, Costa Rica y en las Páginas de Contenido de CIAT, Colombia. Todos los artículos que en ella se publican son sometidos a un sistema de doble arbitraje por especialistas en el tema. The Revista Nicaragüense de Entomología (ISSN 1021-0296) is a journal listed in the Latin-American Index of Scientific Journals. It is indexed in: Zoological Records, Entomológical, Life Sciences Collections, Review of Medical and Veterinary Entomology and Review of Agricultural Entomology. And reported in CATIE, Costa Rica and CIAT, Colombia. Two independent specialists referee all published papers. Consejo Editorial Jean Michel Maes Fernando Hernández-Baz Editor General Editor Asociado Museo Entomológico Universidad Veracruzana Nicaragua México José Clavijo Albertos Silvia A. Mazzucconi Universidad Central de Universidad de
    [Show full text]
  • Brief Review on Lantana Camera
    International Journal of Secondary Metabolite 2019, Vol. 6, No. 2, 205-210 https://dx.doi.org/10.21448/ijsm.577172 Published at http://ijate.net/index.php/ijsm http://dergipark.org.tr/ijsm Review Article Brief Review on Lantana camera Rohit Shankar Mane 1, Rachana Dattatray Nagarkar 2, Pragati Pramod Sonawane 3, Ankala Basappa Vedamurthy *,1 1 Department of Studies in Biotechnology and Microbiology, Karnatak University, Dharwad, Karnataka, 580003, India. 2 Sanjivani Arts, Commerce, Science College Kopargaon, Maharashtra 423603, India 3 Department of Microbiology, Access Health Care, Pune, Maharashtra, India. Abstract: Medicinal plants are widely spread in nature with their unique habitats ARTICLE HISTORY and effective medicinal properties. One of them plant is Lantana Camera. The L. Received: February 06, 2019 camera is well known invasive weed. Used to cure several diseases in Ayurvedic Accepted: June 09, 2019 preparations with different formulations. This plant has great ethnobotany and Pharmacology however it is lagging behind in the list of medicinal plants for their KEYWORDS applications in drug preparations due to mere research study and awareness. Therefore present review may help to reveal different aspects of L. camera with Lantana camera, their awareness in society. Ethnobotany, Pharmacology 1. INTRODUCTION The term "biodiversity hotspot" was coined by the British biologist Norman Myers in 1988. He described them as a biogeographic region by characterizing their exceptional levels of plant endemism and serious levels of habitat loss [1]. Further, in between 1989-1996, Conservation International (CI) adopted ‘Myers hotspots criteria’ and they made one organization for the reassessment of the hotspots concept and in 2005 they have published an revised title “Hotspots Revisited: Earth's Biologically Richest and Most Endangered Terrestrial Ecoregions” [2].
    [Show full text]
  • Dow Agrosciences Petitions (09-233- 01P, 09-349-01P, and 11-234-01P) for Determinations of Nonregulated Status for 2,4-D-Resistant Corn and Soybean Varieties
    Dow AgroSciences Petitions (09-233- 01p, 09-349-01p, and 11-234-01p) for Determinations of Nonregulated Status for 2,4-D-Resistant Corn and Soybean Varieties Draft Environmental Impact Statement—2013 Agency Contact: Sid Abel Biotechnology Regulatory Services 4700 River Road USDA, APHIS Riverdale, MD 20737 Fax: (301) 734-6352 The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’S TARGET Center at (202) 720–2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326–W, Whitten Building, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250–9410 or call (202) 720–5964 (voice and TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Mention of companies or commercial products in this report does not imply recommendation or endorsement by the U.S. Department of Agriculture over others not mentioned. USDA neither guarantees nor warrants the standard of any product mentioned. Product names are mentioned solely to report factually on available data and to provide specific information. This publication reports research involving pesticides. All uses of pesticides must be registered by appropriate State and/or Federal agencies before they can be recommended. CAUTION: Pesticides can be injurious to humans, domestic animals, desirable plants, and fish and other wildlife—if they are not handled or applied properly.
    [Show full text]
  • Macrolepidoptera Inventory of the Chilcotin District
    Macrolepidoptera Inventory of the Chilcotin District Aud I. Fischer – Biologist Jon H. Shepard - Research Scientist and Crispin S. Guppy – Research Scientist January 31, 2000 2 Abstract This study was undertaken to learn more of the distribution, status and habitat requirements of B.C. macrolepidoptera (butterflies and the larger moths), the group of insects given the highest priority by the BC Environment Conservation Center. The study was conducted in the Chilcotin District near Williams Lake and Riske Creek in central B.C. The study area contains a wide variety of habitats, including rare habitat types that elsewhere occur only in the Lillooet-Lytton area of the Fraser Canyon and, in some cases, the Southern Interior. Specimens were collected with light traps and by aerial net. A total of 538 species of macrolepidoptera were identified during the two years of the project, which is 96% of the estimated total number of species in the study area. There were 29,689 specimens collected, and 9,988 records of the number of specimens of each species captured on each date at each sample site. A list of the species recorded from the Chilcotin is provided, with a summary of provincial and global distributions. The habitats, at site series level as TEM mapped, are provided for each sample. A subset of the data was provided to the Ministry of Forests (Research Section, Williams Lake) for use in a Flamulated Owl study. A voucher collection of 2,526 moth and butterfly specimens was deposited in the Royal BC Museum. There were 25 species that are rare in BC, with most known only from the Riske Creek area.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of the Declaration of Lantana Species in New South Wales Review of the Declaration of Lantana Species in New South Wales
    NSW DPI Review of the declaration of Lantana species in New South Wales Review of the declaration of Lantana species in New South Wales New South Wales Department of Primary Industries Orange NSW 2800 Frontispiece. A flowering and fruiting branch of the common pink variety of Lantana camara, near Copmanhurst (NSW north coast, October 2005) (Source: S. Johnson, NSW DPI). © State of New South Wales through NSW Department of Primary Industries 2007. You may copy, distribute and otherwise freely deal with this publication for any purpose, provided that you attribute NSW Department of Primary Industries as the owner. ISBN 978 0 7347 1889 1 Disclaimer: The information contained in this publication is based on knowledge and understanding at the time of writing (December 2007). However, because of advances in knowledge, users are reminded of the need to ensure that information upon which they rely is up to date and to check currency of the information with the appropriate officer of New South Wales Department of Primary Industries or the user’s independent adviser. Job number 7262 This document was prepared by Dr Stephen Johnson Weed Ecologist Weeds Unit Biosecurity, Compliance and Mine Safety Telephone: 02 6391 3146 Facsimile: 02 6391 3206 Locked Bag 21 ORANGE NSW 2800 Figure 1. White and purple flowering varieties of the ornamental Lantana montevidensis planted in a median strip, Griffith (south western NSW, September 2005) (Source: S. Johnson, NSW DPI). iv REVIEW OF THE DECLARATION OF LANTANA SPECIES IN NSW CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 SCOPE OF THIS REVIEW 3 REVIEW OF THE DECLARATION OF LANTANA SPECIES IN NSW 5 NOMENCLATURE 5 Lantana camara 5 Lantana montevidensis 5 SPECIES DESCRIPTIONS 5 Lantana camara 5 Lantana montevidensis 7 TAXONOMY 9 Family Verbenaceae 9 Lantana genus 9 The Lantana camara species aggregate 9 Varieties of L.
    [Show full text]
  • Lepidoptera Recorded for Imperial County California Compiled by Jeffrey Caldwell [email protected] 1-925-949-8696 Note
    Lepidoptera Recorded for Imperial County California Compiled by Jeffrey Caldwell [email protected] 1-925-949-8696 Note: BMNA = Butterflies and Moths of North America web site MPG = Moth Photographers Group web site Most are from the Essig Museum’s California Moth Specimens Database web site Arctiidae. Tiger and Lichen Moths. Apantesis proxima (Notarctia proxima). Mexican Tiger Moth. 8181 [BMNA] Ectypia clio (clio). Clio Tiger Moth. 8249 Estigmene acrea (acrea). Salt Marsh Moth. 8131 Euchaetes zella. 8232 Autostichidae (Deoclonidae). Oegoconia novimundi. Four-spotted Yellowneck Moth. 1134 (Oegoconia quadripuncta mis-applied) Bucculatricidae. Ribbed Cocoon-maker Moths. Bucculatrix enceliae. Brittlebrush Moth. 0546 Cossidae. Goat Moths, Carpenterworm Moths, and Leopard Moths. Comadia henrici. 2679 Givira mucida. 2660 Hypopta palmata. 2656 Prionoxystus robiniae (mixtus). Carpenterworm or Locust Borer. 2693 Depressariidae. Pseudethmia protuberans. 1008 [MPG] Ethmiidae. Now assigned to Depressariidae. Ethmiinae. Ethmia timberlakei. 0984 Pseudethmia protuberans. 1008 Gelechiidae. Twirler Moths. Aristotelia adceanotha. 1726 [Sighting 1019513 BMNA] Chionodes abdominella. 2054 Chionodes dentella. 2071 Chionodes fructuaria. 2078 Chionodes kincaidella. 2086 (reared from Atriplex acanthocarpa in Texas) Chionodes oecus. 2086.2 Chionodes sistrella. 2116 Chionodes xanthophilella. 2125 Faculta inaequalis. Palo Verde Webworm. 2206 Friseria cockerelli. Mesquite Webworm. 1916 Gelechia desiliens. 1938 Isophrictis sabulella. 1701 Keiferia lycopersicella. Tomato Pinworm. 2047 Pectinophora gossypiella. Pink Bollworm. 2261 Prolita puertella. 1895 Prolita veledae. 1903 Geometridae. Inchworm Moths, Loopers, Geometers, or Measuring Worms. Archirhoe neomexicana. 7295 Chesiadodes coniferaria. 6535 Chlorochlamys appellaria. 7073 Cyclophora nanaria. Dwarf Tawny Wave. W 7140 Dichorda illustraria. 7055 Dichordophora phoenix. Phoenix Emerald. 7057 Digrammia colorata. Creosote Moth. 6381 Digrammia irrorata (rubricata). 6395 Digrammia pictipennata. 6372 Digrammia puertata.
    [Show full text]
  • MOTHS and BUTTERFLIES LEPIDOPTERA DISTRIBUTION DATA SOURCES (LEPIDOPTERA) * Detailed Distributional Information Has Been J.D
    MOTHS AND BUTTERFLIES LEPIDOPTERA DISTRIBUTION DATA SOURCES (LEPIDOPTERA) * Detailed distributional information has been J.D. Lafontaine published for only a few groups of Lepidoptera in western Biological Resources Program, Agriculture and Agri-food Canada. Scott (1986) gives good distribution maps for Canada butterflies in North America but these are generalized shade Central Experimental Farm Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0C6 maps that give no detail within the Montane Cordillera Ecozone. A series of memoirs on the Inchworms (family and Geometridae) of Canada by McGuffin (1967, 1972, 1977, 1981, 1987) and Bolte (1990) cover about 3/4 of the Canadian J.T. Troubridge fauna and include dot maps for most species. A long term project on the “Forest Lepidoptera of Canada” resulted in a Pacific Agri-Food Research Centre (Agassiz) four volume series on Lepidoptera that feed on trees in Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada Canada and these also give dot maps for most species Box 1000, Agassiz, B.C. V0M 1A0 (McGugan, 1958; Prentice, 1962, 1963, 1965). Dot maps for three groups of Cutworm Moths (Family Noctuidae): the subfamily Plusiinae (Lafontaine and Poole, 1991), the subfamilies Cuculliinae and Psaphidinae (Poole, 1995), and ABSTRACT the tribe Noctuini (subfamily Noctuinae) (Lafontaine, 1998) have also been published. Most fascicles in The Moths of The Montane Cordillera Ecozone of British Columbia America North of Mexico series (e.g. Ferguson, 1971-72, and southwestern Alberta supports a diverse fauna with over 1978; Franclemont, 1973; Hodges, 1971, 1986; Lafontaine, 2,000 species of butterflies and moths (Order Lepidoptera) 1987; Munroe, 1972-74, 1976; Neunzig, 1986, 1990, 1997) recorded to date.
    [Show full text]
  • Biotic Potential, Fertility and Life Table of Spodoptera Albula (Walker) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), Under Controlled Conditions
    Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências (2014) 86(2): 723-732 (Annals of the Brazilian Academy of Sciences) Printed version ISSN 0001-3765 / Online version ISSN 1678-2690 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0001-3765201402812 www.scielo.br/aabc Biotic potential, fertility and life table of Spodoptera albula (Walker) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), under controlled conditions DÉBORA G. MONTEZANO1, ALEXANDRE SPECHT1,2, DANIEL R. SOSA-GÓMEZ3, VÂNIA F. ROQUE-SPECHT4, TARCISO M. BORTOLIN5, EDEGAR FRONZA1, PATRÍCIA PEZZI1, PRISCILA C. LUZ1 and NEIVA M. BARROS1 1Universidade de Caxias do Sul, Caixa Postal 1352, 95070-560 Caxias do Sul, RS, Brasil 2Embrapa Cerrados, BR 020, Km 18, Caixa Postal 08223, 73310-970, Planaltina, DF, Brasil 3Embrapa Soja, Rod. Carlos João Strass - Distrito de Warta, Caixa Postal 231, 86001-970 Londrina, PR, Brasil 4Faculdade UnB Planaltina, Área Universitária n. 1, Vila Nossa Senhora de Fátima, 73300-000 Planaltina, DF, Brasil 5Gravena - Pesquisa, Consultoria e Treinamento Agrícola Ltda. Rod. Dep. Cunha Bueno (SP-253), Km 221,5, Caixa Postal 546, 14870-990 Jaboticabal, SP, Brasil Manuscript received on May 16, 2012; accepted for publication on July 30, 2013 ABSTRACT This study aimed to evaluate the biotic potential, life table parameters and fertility of Spodoptera albula (Walker, 1857) under controlled conditions (25 ± 1°C, 70 ± 10% RH and 14 hour photo phase). The longevity, pre, post and oviposition periods, fecundity and fertility of 13 couples were evaluated. The longevity of females (13.500 days) was significantly higher than those of males (11.154 days). The mean durations of the pre, post and oviposition periods were 2.615, 1.769 and 9.385 days, respectively.
    [Show full text]