LECHMERE AT CAMBRIDGESIDE GALLERIA CAMBRIDGE,U MASSACHUSETTS
Prepared for:
Lechmere 10 Commerce Way Woburn, Massachusetts CZ
h
Prepared by:
Environmental Applications, II Waltham, Massachusetts
November 28, 1988 Project No. C-1191
Copyright 1988 Environmental Applications, Inc. I lEA ENVIRONMENTAL APPLICATIONS, INC. I November 28, 1988 EA Project No. C-1191
I Lechmere i 10 Commerce Way Woburn, Massachusetts 01801
Attention: Mr. Raymond Gutoski
I Re: Lechmere at CambridgeSide Galleria i Cambridge, Massachusetts Gentlemen:
I In accordance with our Proposal Amendment dated October 25,1988, Environmental Applications, Inc. (EA) has completed the removal of certain coal tar contaminated soil encountered at the 1 CambridgeSide Galleria site. This report describes the identification, characterization and removal of the contaminated soil.
BACKGROUND
On June 29, 1988 Goldberg-Zoino and Associates, Inc. (GZA) I identified a zone of potentially contaminated soil during excavation near the elevator shaft along the western edge of the Lechmere construction site (refer to Figure 1). According to specifications developed by GZA, the soil was excavated, stockpiled on and covered by polyethylene sheeting, and physically isolated from other excavated soils by a bermed area.
I GZA collected samples from the suspect soil and submitted them to a certified laboratory for petroleum hydrocarbon analysis and gas I chromatography (GC) fingerprinting. The results, presented in Appendix A, indicated that the soil contained petroleum hydrocarbons in excess of 3,000 parts per million (ppm) with a GC I fingerprint similar to that of coal tar. The soil was classified by GZA as hazardous waste thereby mandating regulated off site disposal.
IThe stockpile was sampled by EA on July 8, 1988 and the samples were submitted to Skinner & Sherman Laboratories for a RCRA hazardous waste characterization analysis. The waste stream I characterization analysis included tests to determine the following: leachable metals, pH, ignitability, reactivity, volatile organic compounds (VOCs), PCB concentration and semi- i volatile organic compounds.
Tank Management/Environmental Remediation Services/Construction Management 335 Bear Hill Road Waltham, MA 02154 617-890-3922 An Equal Opportunity Employer M/F/V/H I
I Lechmere - November 28, 1988 - Project No. C-1191 Page 2 I
I The analytical results, contained in Appendix B, indicated that the contamination levels in the soil sample were below the Sestablished RCRA limits for leachable metals, reactivity, and PCB concentration.
Ignitability (flash point) of the sample exceeded 200OF and the I pH value of 7.85 is within the range for urban environments. The analysis indicated the presence of semi-volatile compounds typically associated with coal tar, however, the soil was not a federally listed hazardous waste or hazardous by characteristic. 1 The soil was considered a hazardous waste in Massachusetts due to the concentration of petroleum hydrocarbons.
On August 1, 1988 an additional pocket of coal tar contaminated soil was encountered during excavation associated with the elevator shaft construction. Per the project specifications, I this material was separately stockpiled on and covered by polyethylene sheeting, and was physically isolated from other excavated material by a bermed area. Subsequent laboratory I analysis performed by Skinner & Sherman Laboratories, presented in Appendix C, indicated contaminant type and concentrations similar to the previously identified contaminated soil. This additional volume of soil was classified in the same manner as * the previously excavated coal tar contaminated soil.
CONTAMINATED SOIL DISPOSAL
U From October 28 to November 10, 1988, the stockpiled contaminated soil was loaded and transported off site to a lined landfill. Licensed hazardous waste transporters were used to deliver thirty four vehicle loads of contaminated soil to Chemical Waste Management (CWM) Chemical Services, Inc. in Model City, New York. Vehicle loading was conducted by the site excavation contractor, A.J. Welch, under the direction of EA's Environmental Specialist, Mr. Stephen Hamburger. I Based on actual weight measurements of vehicle loads, (Appendix D), 629.68 tons of coal tar contaminated soil were transported to CWM Chemical Services, Inc. Landfill. Appendix E contains Scompleted copies of the Uniform Hazardous Waste Manifest for each load. EA has mailed the appropriate copies of the waste manifests to the designated states on behalf of Lechmere. I I Lechmere - November 28, 1988 - Project No. C-1191 Paqe 3
We trust this information satisfies your present needs. However, should you have any questions or require additional information, please contact us at your convenience.
Very truly yours,
ENVIRONMENTAL APPL42IONS, INC.
'Joseph C. FogliT Project Manager
JCF/JNC/lv
Attachments: Figure 1 Appendices A, B, C - Analytical Data Appendix D - Certified Weight Receipts Appendix E - Hazardous Waste Manifests cc: Bob Palermo - GZA - Newton FIGURES TPF FIELD SUMMARY SITE SKETCH LECHMERE SITE
- .1--I B,- 88 T. TLR0A. LRED1C .7 E- 2-88 rr oryC6 rJ-F'fE SKETCH 7LRI/T FROMI 9ASE MAF F4' ICE T 3E ARR4 R L_. 0 CAMmRIG5s1 (A...EFA, FFACL. E: CAv!ATIc SFE.F G z2 ">0 A A :T4 AREA CH ?E TAL 2, 2LA 10'b EE7 ITRMIM 5 ( T:.r 'tA$. :f__ OF :515 FR: E1ST'4 T-,4AFFI. --A' *Eb, P _ S£O'L BE CYSY'ARE ACC'URATh5' ! T E! IYMF 'E8 9,' .HE VE.LE USE. FI.=. APPENDIX A ANALYTICAL DATA Erco Laboratory I TEnseco I July 11, 1988 I I Mr. Ted Pickering Goldberg-Zoino & Associates, Inc. 320 Needham Street Newton, MA 02164 Dear Ted: Enclosed are the results of the analyses performed on the one soil sample for Lechmere at Cambridgeside Galleria, Cambridge, MA (Project No. J-7088.8; Purchase Order No. 25092). This project was I received under chain of custody at Enseco - Erco Laboratory on June 30, 1988, and was processed for a one-week turnaround time. A brief description of the Quality Assurance/Quality Control and methods employed iby Enseco are contained within the report. This letter authorizes the release of the analytical results and should be considered an integral part of this report. Please refer to this project by the Erco Laboratory Identification 1 No. 8352 to help expedite any future discussions. We will be happy to answer any questions or concerns that you may have. Sincerely, I 6 Clyde E. Tressler I Client Service Representative I 12 Thomas R. Copeland, Ph.D. I Technical Director Encl. I IEnseco Incorporated 205 Alewife Brook Parkway Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138 617/661-31I Fax: 617/354 5258 I I I I I QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL I I I I I I I I I I I - i Eneco QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL I As an indication of the overall quality of the data generated by Enseco - Erco Laboratory for this report, the following controls have been provided (when 1 applicable). Reagent or analytical blanks are analyzed to assess the level of contamination which exists in the analytical system. An analytical blank, analyzed with every batch of samples, consists of reagents specific to the method. This blank is carried through every aspect of the procedure, including preparation, cleanup, and I analysis. Ideally, the concentration of an analyte in the blank is below the reporting limit for that analyte. However, some common laboratory solvents and metals are difficult to eliminate to the part-per-billion levels commonly reported I inenvironmental analyses. Therefore, analytical data are corrected for blank contamination before they are reported to the client. 3Laboratory control samples (LCS) are used to monitor the laboratory's day-to- day performance of routine analytical methods. An LCS consists of a standard, I control matrix which is spiked with a group of target compounds representative of the method analytes. The LCS is analyzed with environmental samples to provide evidence that the laboratory is performing the method within accepted QC I guidelines. An LCS has been established for most routine analytical methods. Reagent I water is used as the control matrix for the analysis of aqueous samples. The LCS compounds are spiked into reagent water and carried through the appropriate steps of the analysis. As stated in SW-846 (third edition), a universal blank matrix Sdoes not exist for solid samples and therefore no matrix is used. The LCS for solid samples consists of the LCS compounds spiked into a reagent blank and carried I through the appropriate steps of the analysis. The data thus obtained are used to set the LCS control limits. As sufficient laboratory data become available, the control limits are redefined based upon the most recent six months of LCS data. E Control limits for accuracy are based on the historical average recovery of the LCS plus or minus three standard deviation units. I Surrogates are organic compounds that are similar to the analytes of interest in chemical behavior but which are not normally found in environmental samples. Enseco routinely adds surrogates to samples requiring GS/MS analysis and reports these surrogate recoveries to the client. These surrogates are added to samples to monitor the effect of the matrix on the accuracy of the analysis. Results are I reported in terms of percent recovery. I I -Enseco HYDROCARBON FINGERPRINTING U.S. COAST GUARD OIL SPILL IDENTIFICATION SYSTEM MARINE ORGANICS LABORATORY Client Name: Goldberg-Zoino & Associates, Inc. Matrix: Solid Authorized: NA Sampled: NA Received: NA Concentration Units: Uq/q (dry wt) Prepared: 07/05/88 Analyzed: 07/06/88 Total Reporting Reporting Petroleum Limits for Limits for Enseco Client Hydro- Individual Total % ID ID carbons Hydrocarbons Product Solids 8293-09B Erco Blank ND 0.2 5.0 NA Qualitative Identification: NA NA = Not applicable. ND = Not detected at or above reporting limit. All samples are corrected for Method Blank. Minimum reporting limit for Individual hydrocarbons = 0.2 pg/g (dry wt). Minimum reporting limit for total products = 5.0 pg/g (dry wt). Internal standard recovery = 117%. Reported by Approved by IM1 ITNAME--GZA/44 (R)P: (7/8) 03 - * 'Ensecoo HYDROCARBON FINGERPRINTING U.S. COAST GUARD OIL SPILL IDENTIFICATION SYSTEM MARINE ORGANICS LABORATORY i QUALITY CONTROL Client Name: Goldberg-Zolno & Associates, Inc. Client ID: Laboratory Control Spike Laboratory ID: 8321-04BS Matrix: Aqueous Sampled: NA Received: NA Authorized: NA Prepared: 06/29/88 Analyzed: 07/05/88 Parameter % Recovery QC Advisory Limits ortho-Terphenyl 60 - 120% Fuel Oil No. 2 60 - 120% NA = Not applicable. Reported by Approved by -SEnseco HYDROCARBON FINGERPRINTING U.S. COAST GUARD OIL SPILL IDENTIFICATION SYSTEM MARINE ORGANICS LABORATORY QUALITY CONTROL Client Name: Goldberg-Zoino & Associates, Inc. Client ID: Laboratory Control Spike Dup. Laboratory ID: 8321-04BSD Matrix: AQueous Sampled: NA Received: NA Authorized: NA Prepared: 06/29/88 Analyzed: 07/05/88 Parameter % Recovery OC Advisory Limits ortho-Terphenyl 60 - 120% Fuel Oil No. 2 60 - 120% NA = Not applicable. Reported by Approved by Rim I I I I I , ANALYTICAL RESULTS I I I I I I I I I I I I I I -SEnseco.5/ ANALYTICAL RESULTS I The method number provided on each data report sheet refers to a publication originating from a regulatory or standard-setting organization. In general, the i methods employed are those specified by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and other state and federal agencies. In cases where an approved regulatory method does not exist, a method developed by Enseco will be employed to meet the specific needs of the client. The methods commonly employed by Enseco are based on methods from the following references. I U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1983. Methods for chemical analysis of water and wastes. EPA-600/4-79-020. Cincinnati, OH, March. I U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1984. Test methods for evaluating solid waste, physical/chemical methods. (SW-846); Washington, D.C. April. I U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1986. Methods for the determination of organic compounds in finished drinking water and raw source water. 1 Cincinnati, OH, September. "Guidelines Establishing Test Procedures for the Analysis of Pollutants Under the Clean Water Act," 40 CFR, Part 136; Federal Register, Vol. 49, No. 209 (1984). American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, Water Pollution Control Federation. 1985. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 16th Edition. Washington, D.C., April. Current EPA Contract Laboratory Program (CLP) protocols for the analysis 3 of organic and inorganic hazardous substances including chlorinated dioxins and furans. I I I I I I I 'gEnsem HYDROCARBON FINGERPRINTING U.S. COAST GUARD OIL SPILL IDENTIFICATION SYSTEM MARINE ORGANICS LABORATORY Client Name: Goldberq-Zoino & Associates. Inc. Matrix: Solid Authorized: 06/30/88 Sampled: 06/29/88 Received: 06/30/88 Concentration Units: lqg/g (dry wt) Prepared: 07/05/88 Analyzed: 07/07/88 Total Reporting Reporting Petroleum Limits for Limits for Enseco Client Hydro- Individual Total % ID ID carbons Hydrocarbons Product Solids 8352-01 6-29-88 S-1 69,000 20 500 78 Qualitative Identification: This sample has GC/FID characteristics that are similar to coal tar. All samples are corrected for Method Blank. Minimum reporting limit for individual hydrocarbons = 0.2 pg/g (dry wt). Minimum reporting limit for total products = 5.0 pg/g (dry wt). Internal standard recovery was diluted out. Reported by L Approved by r M m zz z O C z 6 Co -r - a o= m to w 0N 0 0 z n m - -£ 1. (>0 > E-< "5 0 -1 4, *o * 0 0 GOLDBERG-ZOINO & ASSOCIATES EZA 8020 ANALYSIS 320 NEEDHAM STREET PURGEABLE AROMATICS NEWTON UPPER FALLS.MA 02164 (617) 969-0050 JOB #: J-7088.8 DATE SAMPLED: 6/29/88 SAMPLE #: S-1 (6/29/88) DATE TESTED: 7/6/88 LABORATORY #: 00495-25 DILUTION FACTOR: 140 CONCENTRATION DETECTION LIMIT 8020 COMPOUNDS: ug/1 (PPB) ug/I (PPB) BENZENE ND TOLUENE -- 4000-- ETHYL BENZENE -- 1200-- TOTAL XYLENES -- 15000-- CHLOROBENZENE ND 1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE NO 1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE COMMENTS_ Twelve unknown compounds were detected. ANALYZED BY: ALL qL_ REVIEWED BY: EWP d GOLOBERG-ZOINO & ASSOCIATES GZA 8020 ANALYSIS 320 NEEDHAM STREET PURGEABLE AROMATICS NEWTON UPPER FALLS,MA 02164 (617) 989-0050 JOB 1: J-7088.8 DATE SAMPLED: 6/29/88 SAMPLE 1: S-3 (6/29/88) DATE TESTED: 7/6/88 LABORATORY #: 00496-25 DILUTION FACTOR: 110 CONCENTRATION DETECTION LIMIT 8020 COMPOUNDS: ug/1 (PPB) ug/l (PPB) BENZENE NDO 110 TOLUENE ND lie ETHYL BENZENE -- Trace-- 110 TOTAL XYLENES -- 750-- 110110 CHLOROBENZENE 110110 1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE 110 1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE 110 1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE COMMENTS One unknown compound was detected. ANALYZED BY: ALL AL.L REVIEWED BY: EWP d EZ EPA METHIDLQ 810/8020 ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY & INSTRUMENTATION EPA Methods 8010 and 8020 are purge and trap chromatographic methods for the identification and quantification of volatile halocarbons and volatile aromatics in solid waste samples. Approximately 4 gm of wet soil is added to a calibrated tube and the exact weight is recorded. Then 9 ml of methanol and 1.0 ml of 2 ug/ml spiking solution is quickly added and the sample tube is shaken vigorously for 2 minutes. A 1.0 ml aliquot of extract is stored in a vial and an appropriate dilution in water is placed in a sparger. A Tekmar Model LSC-2 Liquid Sample Concentrator is used in conjunction with a Tekmar Model ALS Automatic Laboratory Sampler to purge volatile compounds by bubbling helium gas through a 5 ml extract-water sample and pass the vapor through a tenax/silica gel sorbent trap. The purgeable compounds retained on the trap are then thermally desorbed and passed through a heated line into the gas chromatograph. GZA performs both methods simultaneously on a Hewlett-Packard HP 5890A Gas Chromatograph equipped with a HNU Systems PI-52A Photoionization Detector (PID) and a 0.I. Corporation Model 4420 Electrolytic Conductivity Dectector (ELCD) installed in series. After chromatographic separation, purgeable aromatics are detected on the HNU PID, a non-destructive detection method, and the purgeable halocarbons are then detected by the 0.I. Corporation ELCD. Response data are acquired by a Nelson Analytical 760 Series Intelligent Interface, transmitted to an IBM AT Personal Computer and analyzed using the Nelson Analytical 2600 Series Chromatography Software. The information for the report is entered manually onto a Lotus Symphony spreadsheet. REPORT FORMAT The method detection limit (MDL) is stated for every report and is adjusted when dilutions are made to bring sample response data within the calibrated range of the method. Concentrations measured in the range of 1 to 5 times the MDL are reported as "Trace" and below this range are reported as none detected or "ND". Concentrations less than the MDL may be identified as beneath the method detection limit (BMDL). DISCLAIMER Identities and concentrations of purgeable halocarbons and purgeable aromatics by this dynamic headspace technique are subject to limitations inherent to these methods. If confirmation is desired, duplicate samples should be submitted to a State certified laboratory for analysis by EPA Method 8240. L8ASORATORY CONTACT PERSON: Edward W. Pickering Environmental Chemistry Laboratory Manager Goldberg-Zoino & Associates, Inc. 320 Needham Street Newton Upper Falls, MA 02164 Phone #: (617) 969-0050, x169. REFERENCES McNally, M.E. and R.L. Grob, "A review: Current applications of static and dynamic headspace analysis: Part one: Environmental applications", Am. Lab. 20 (1) 20-33, (1985). Wylie, P.L., "Performance of the Hewlett-Packard 19394A Environmental analysis system: Operation of the electrolytic conductivity detector in series with the photoionization detector", Hewlett-Packard Application Note No. 228-49, Publication No. 43-5954-7612, (1987). U.S. EPA, "Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste", Volume 1B. Method 8010 - Halogenated Volatile Organics. U.S. EPA, "Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste", Volume 1B. Method 8020 - Aromatic Volatile Organics. Sept., 1987/EWP JOB1: 1-7088.8 GOLBERG-ZOIlO & ASSOCIArES DATESUIPLED: 6/29/28 320 HEECHI STREET DRIE TESIED: 6/30/BR HElIONHUPPER FALLS, MA 02161 (617) 969-0050 GZA GCSCREEHING FORUOLATILE ORGANICS IN SOILS (CONHEEHTRATIOH- PPli,ug/gran of wet soil) SRMPLE HIE: S-1 S-3 I MEiHO i (6/29/88) (6/29/88) IDETECTIONH 6Z8 L8 I: 16413-Soil 1631l-Soil LIMIT 1. IETRBCHLOROETH[HE , 0.02 Z.TRICHLORGETHEHE 0.01 3.1,-OICEHLOROETIHE 1 0.01 4I. OIRL 1,2- DICHLOROETHENESI 0.02 S. hETHYLENECHLORIDE I 0.02 6.I,I,-RICHLOROETHSHE I I 0.02z 7. 1,I-DICHLOROETHAHE 1 0.01 8.1,2-OICHLOROETHRHE 1 I 0.01 9.CHLOROETHAHE I 0.01 10. MEIHYL-t-BUTYL ETHER I Trace 0.01 11.BEHZENE I 1.1 Trace 0.01 12.TOLUENE 5.8 0.93 1 0,01 13. ETHYL BEHZENE i 1.8 1,2 0.01 14. n,p-XYLENES 20 5.4 0.02 15. o-VYLEHE 7.5 2.9 0.02 16. RCEEIONE 0.01 17. METHYL ETHYL KETOHE 1 0.01 18. METHYLISOBUTYL I 0.01 KETOHNE 19. EHLOROFO I 0.01 20. FREON 113 (CE13-EF3) S 0.03 21.CRRBOH IETRRCHLORIDE 1 i 0.04 22. CHLOROBEHZENE 0.02 23.STYREHE 0.03 TOTRL CWPOUNDS (1-23) 37 10 METHAHE - HO No UNKHOUHS(1) Present (52) Present (49) Coent s:_ Results in excess of 10 ppi are beyond the linear range of the calibration curue and indicate order of nagnitude only. The pattern of the chromatogranms, along uith the detection of the "'BIX' compounds, indicates the presence of gasoline. RNRLYZEDBY KUJA/.. REUIEUIEDBY CUP(611P 4jr tw Jobl: .J?088.8 .OLDOERG-ZOIIIO It8SSOCITES Date Sanoled: 6/29/88 320 NEHNIISTRElT Date jested: 7/5/88 GMZSCREENlIG RNRILYSIS FOR NEUIOLINUPPER fALLS, M1l j "1R'S111111 fSiilfS 0111 ('u,'r StIlL) (61') 1'-1II150 Sadel S-1 5-3 (6/29) (6/29) Labi OI65O-PCB 01649-PCS i IROCLOR 1260 110 fli SRROCLOR 1251 l0 fi RR0CLOR1218 Nfo ti I 1ROCLOR 1212 NO i0 ROCLOR1232 lID fiO I ROCULOR1221 110 NO iROCIOR 1016 110 ND fLPHR-BHC Ni 110 11111-1111C 110 111 ITA-911C IlaO fli HEPIRCHLOR fi0 No DELf-BHC NO 110 fLORIlI 110 lig 3 HEPiCHLOR [POXIDE ND 110 E1OSULFRN I No0 ig - POE NO 11g - DIELORIN t10 1O 1ENDRIN Il0 NO I 000gz n0 n0 E1itSULf0l 1 110 No D0T NO NO Ill[iRIN LEiHYl 110 nD SEtIOOSULFIN SULFRIE NI1 11 Cments: [arly eluting unknown conpounds were detected in sa-,ole S-3 (6/29). 11hinh level of oetroleun distillate interferences was observed in sample S-I (6/291. K111 1 WgE tu /I ANALYTICAL DATA I I I I fl istific ENVIRONMENTAL I CHEMICAL mPHYSICAL m ELECTRICAL m METALLURGICAL prepared for Environmental Applications, Inc. Case No. 8807034 TMA Thernno Analytical nc Skinner & Sherman LaboratoriesInc. 300 Second Avenue, P.O. Box 521, Waltham, Massachusetts 02254-0521 (617) 890-7200 1-800-542-3322 MA 1-800-541-3322 Outside MA TECHNICAL REPORT 02 August 1988 Page 1 of 7 CLIENT: Environmental Applications, Inc. 335 Bear Hill Road Waltham, MA 02154 * Attention: Mr. Joseph Foglio CASE NO: 8807034 REFERENCE: Purchase Order No. 811; R-1191; Lechmere PROJECT DESCRIPTION: 1 Analysis of one composite soil sample for E.P. toxicity metals plus copper, nickel and zinc, total lead and arsenic, ignitability, corrosivity, reactivity, volatile organics, PCBs and I pesticides, and base/neutral and acid extractables. SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION: OlA Stockpile #9, 7/8/88. I 01B Stockpile #9, 7/8/88. 01C Stockpile #9, 7/8/88. The above samples were received on 08 July 1988 and composited. METHOD OF TEST: A. E.P. TOXICITY METALS -- The sample was extracted and analyzed I according to Methods cited in SW-846, Third Edition. The analysis was performed using a Thermo Jarrell-Ash ICAP61 Inductively Coupled Plasma Spectrophotometer. Selenium was analyzed by a Thermo Jarrell-Ash Video 22 Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometer. Mercury was determined by a Spectro Products Hg-4 mercury analyzer with a Thermo Jarrell-Ash AVA 400 cold vapor generator. I B. TOTAL METALS -- The sample was prepared and analyzed according to Methods cited in SW-846, Third Edition. The analysis was performed using a Thermo Jarrell-Ash ICAP 61 Inductively Coupled Plasma Spectrophotometer. QUALITY CONTROL STATEMENT: 1 The instrument is calibrated daily using EPA traceable materials. Quantitation is performed by the external standards method. Method blanks, duplicate samples and spiked samples are analyzed to insure accuracy, reproducibility and freedom from interferences * and matrix effects. C. CORROSIVITY -- The pH of the sample was determined according to Method 9045 of SW-846 (Electrometric Procedure Soil pH). D. IGNITABILITY (FLASHPOINT) -- The flashpoint of the sample was done in accordance with ASTM D93 Pensky-Martens Closed Cup, modified. This report is renderedupon all of the following conditions: Skinner & ShermanLaboratories,. Inc. retains ownership of this repor until associatedsubmitted invoice is satisfied. Expertwitness services shall beavailable in conjunction with this report only if prior notification of this potential requirement wasmade and accepted,. before the analysis. This report is not to bereproduced wholly or in part without specialpermission in writing. Total liability islimited to the invoice amount. Skinner & Shermana.Inc.. Skinner & ShermanTechnology, Inc.. and/.or New England Laboratories name and/or logosmay nor beused in conjunction with the contents of this report in my advertising media. The resultslisted refer only to testedsamples and applicable parameters.Product endorsementis neither inferred nor implied. Skinner & ShermanLaboratories. Inc. will exercisedue diligence but will not beresponsible for lost or destroyed samplesor evidenceunless client makesappropriale insurancecoverage arrangments. Samplesare held for thiry daysfollowing issuance of report. Sampleswill be stored at client's expense,if authorized in writing. ThennmoAnalytalI althar Maaust(7)890200 ISkiner & herin TECHNICAL REPORT 02 August 1988 Page 2 of 7 CLIENT: Environmental Applications, Inc. CASE NO: 8807034 E. REACTIVITY -- The sample was prepared in accordance with SW-846 and analyzed by Methods 9010 for cyanide and 9030 for sulfide. F. VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS -- The sample was prepared by Method 5030 and analyzed by Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectroscopic Method 8240 for determination of volatile organic pollutants by the purge and trap technique. G. PCBs and PESTICIDES -- The sample was prepared by Method 3550 (Sonication Extraction) and analyzed by Gas Chromatography according to Method 8080. H. BASE/NEUTRAL AND ACID EXTRACTABLES -- The sample was prepared by Method 3550 (Sonication Extraction) and analyzed by Method 8270 by Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectroscopy for semivolatile compounds. Quality assurance procedures for GCMS include daily tuning and calibration of the mass spectrometer and the use of surrogate standards in each sample to monitor method performance. Quantitation is performed by the internal standard method. Analysis of blanks, duplicate samples and standards are run frequently as further quality assurance procedures. RESULTS: A. E.P. TOXICITY METALS AND NICKEL, COPPER AND ZINC -- Results are reported in milligrams per liter (ppm) in the extract. Arsenic <0.050 Barium 1.44 Cadmium <0.005 Chromium <0.020 Copper <0.010 Lead 0.06 Mercury <0.0002 Nickel 0.023 Zinc 0.021 Silver <0.010 Selenium <0.005 This report isrendered upon all of the following conditions: Skinner & ShermanLaboratories,. Inc. retainsownership of this report until awsociatedsubmited invoice issatisfied. Exper witness services shall be available in conjunction with this repor only if prior notification of this potential reouirement was madeand acceptled. before the analysis. This report isnot to bereproduced wholly or in part without specialpermission in writing. Total liability islimited Io the invoice amount. Skinner & Sherman,Inc.. Skinner & ShermanTechnology. Inc..and/or New England Laboratories name and/or logos maynot beused in conjunction with the contents of this report in any advertising media. The resultslisted referonly to testedsamples and applicable parameters.Product radorse ment is neitherinfared nor implied. Skinner & ShermanLaboratories. Inc. will exercisedue diligence but will not beresponsible for lost or destroyed samplesor evidence unlessclient makesappropriate insurance coveragearrangements. Samples am held for thirty days following issuanceof report. Sampleswill be stortedat clieni's expense. if authorized in writing. I T A "JA ThermnnoAnalyticallnc t Sk Srbtds TECHNICAL REPORT 02 August 1988 Page 3 of 7 CLIENT: Environmental Applications, Inc. CASE NO: 8807034 B. TOTAL METALS -- Results are reported in milligrams per kilogram (ppm) on a dry weight basis. I Arsenic <10.7 Lead 266. C. PH -- The pH of the soil sample was found to be 7.85. D. IGNITABILITY (Pensky-Martens Flashpoint, 0F): U No flash to 200 0 F. Testing discontinued @ 200 0F. * E. REACTIVITY: Sulfide, as releasable H S <10 mg/kg Cyanide, as releasable HCN <1 mg/kg F. VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS I The parameters for volatile organics are listed in Table 1. The detection limit for halogenated and aromatic compounds is 0.1 mg/kg (ppm). I RESULTS: Table 1. Volatile Organics Parameter Concentration in Sample (mg/kg) Chloromethane ND SVinyl Chloride ND Bromomethane ND Chloroethane ND Trifluorochloromethane ND I Acetone 30.0 1,1-Dichloroethene ND Carbon Disulfide ND I Methylene Chloride ND trans-1, 2-Dichloroethene ND I I This report is rendered upon all of t he following conditions: Skinner & ShermanLaboratories. Inc. retains ownership of this report until associatled submitted invoice is satisfied, Etxpert witness services shall be available in conjunction with this report only if prior notification of this potential requirement was made and accepted, before the analysis. This report is not to be reproduced wholly or in par, without special permission in writing. Total liability islimiten d to the invoice amount. Skinner & Sherman, Inc., Skinner & Sherman Technology. Inc., and/or New England Laboralories name and/or logos may not be usedin conjunction with the conrtentrs of this report in any advertising media. The results listed refer only to tested samples and applicable parameters. Product endorsement is neither inferred nor implied. Skinner & Sherman Laboratories. Inc. will exercise due diligence b ut will not beresponsible for lost or destroyed samples or evidence unless client make, appropriate insurance coverage arrangements. Samples are held for thirty days following issuance of report. Samples will be stored at client 's expense, if authorized in writing. sknLboratoridtI2-332 eao300 tic l lsn i rval mne heranLabratris Ic-300secohAveSo8 W alth/M e uset tt. :1x. . 1-800-542-3322 IA 1-800-541 3322 Otside M STECHNICAL REPORT 02 August 1988 Page 4 of 7 CLIENT: Environmental Applications, Inc. CASE NO: 8807034 Parameter Concentration in Sample, (mg/kg) 1,1-Dichloroethane ND Vinyl Acetate ND 2-Butanone 26.6 Chloroform ND Tetrahydrofuran ND 1,1,1-Trichloroethane ND Carbon Tetrachloride ND Benzene 2.7 1,2-Dichloroethane ND Trichloroethene ND 1,2-Dichloropropane ND Bromodichloromethane ND 2-Chloroethyl Vinyl Ether ND 4-Methyl-2-pentanone ND cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ND Toluene 14.2 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ND 1,1,2-Trichloroethane ND 2-Hexanone ND Tetrachloroethene ND Dibromochloromethane ND Chlorobenzene ND Ethylbenzene 5.8 m-,p-Xylene 233 o-Xylene 35.2 Styrene 10.9 Bromoform ND 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ND n-Propylbenzene 54.9 1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND 1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND 1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND n-Butylbenzene 31.5 Tr - Trace ND - Not Detected This report is rendered upon all of the following conditions: Skinner & Sherman Laboratores. Inc. retains ownership of this report unil associaled submitted invoice issatisfied. Expert witness services shall be available in conjunction with thibisreport only if prior notification of this potential requiremen was made and accepted, before the analysis. This report is not to bereproduced wholly or in part without special permission in writing. Total liability is limited to the invoice amount. Skinner & Sherman. Inc.. Skinner & Sherman Technolosy. Inc., and/or New England Laboratories name and/or logos may not beused in conjunction with the contents of this report in any advertising media. The results listed refer only to tested samnplesand applicable parameters. Product endorsement is neither inferred nor implied. Skinner & Sherman Laboratories. Inc. will exercise due diligence bui will not e responsible for lost or destroyed samplesor evidence unless client makes appropriate insurance coverage arrangements. Samplesare held for thirty days following issuance of report. Samples will be stored at clients expense, if authorized in writing. IA ThermoAnalytical Inc. L o cae & P "' '; -800-542-332MA 18 TECHNICAL REPORT 02 August 1988 Page 5 of 7 CLIENT: Environmental Applications, Inc. CASE NO: 8807034 G. PCBs/PESTICIDES No PCBs were detected in the soil sample. The detection limit is about 10 mg/kg (dry solids basis) calculated as Aroclor 1242. None of the pesticides listed in Method 8080 were detected in the sample. The detection limit is about 1.0 mg/kg (dry solids basis). H. SEMIVOLATILE BASE/NEUTRAL AND ACID EXTRACTABLE COMPOUNDS The parameters for base/neutral and acid extractables are listed in Table 2. The detection limit for most of these compounds is approximately 5 mg/kg (ppm). Table 2. Base-Neutral and Acid Extractables in Soil Parameter Concentration in Sample mg/kg (ppm) N-Nitrosodimethyl amine ND Phenol ND Aniline ND 2-Chlorophenol ND I Bis(2-chloroethyl ) ether ND 1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND 1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND I Benzyl alcohol ND 1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND 2-Methylphenol ND Bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether ND 4-Methylphenol ND N-Nitrosodi-n-propyl amine ND S Hexachloroethane ND Nitrobenzene ND Benzoic acid ND Isophorone ND 2-Nitrophenol ND 2,4-Dimethylphenol ND I This report is rendered upon all of the following conditions: Skinner & Sherman Laboratories. Inc. retains ownership of this report until associated ubmiottedinvoice s satisfied. Expert witness services shall be available in conjunction wiih this reportonly if prior notification of this potential requirement was made and accepted. before the analysis. This reporl is not to be reproduced wholly or in part without special permission in wriling. Total liability is limited to the invoice amount. Skinner & Sherman.Inc., Skinner & ShermanTechnology. Inc.. and/or New England Laboratories name and/or logos may not be usedin conjunction with the contents of this resporin any advertising media. The resultslisted refer only to testedsamples and applicable parameters.Product endorsementis neither inferred nor implied. Skinner & ShermanLaboratories. Inc. will exercise due diligence but will nor be responsiblefor lostor destroyedsamples or evidenceunless client makes appropriate insurancecoverage arrangements. Samplesare held for thirty days following issuanceof report. Samples will be stored at client's expense. if authorized in writing. Thermo;Analyticalin SMA rm o noetnAenuePPO so 5 Walth a2 6 89 0o os:42322A -5413322 utside MA -I tick. TECHNICAL REPORT 02 August 1988 Page 6 of 7 SCLIENT: Environmental Applications, Inc. CASE NO: 8807034 Parameter Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane ND 2,4-Dichlorophenol ND Naphthalene 900 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND 4-Chloroaniline ND Hexachlorobutadiene ND 4-Chloro-3-methylphenol ND 2-Methylnaphthalene 422 Hexachlorocylopentadiene ND 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol ND I 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol ND 2-Chloronaphthalene ND 2-Nitroaniline ND I Dimethyl phthalate ND Acenaphthylene 206 2,6-Dinitrotoluene ND 3-Nitroaniline ND Acenaphthene 39 2,4-Dinitrophenol ND 4-Nitrophenol ND Dibenzofuran 215 I 2,4-Dinitrotoluene ND Fluorene 357 Diethylphthalate ND 4-Nitroaniline ND 4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether ND 2-Methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol ND I N-Nitrosodiphenylamine ND Azobenzene ND I I This report is rendered upon all of the following conditions: Skinner & Sherman Labhoratories. Inc. relains ownership of this report until associated submitted invoice issatisfied. Expert witness services shall be available in conjunction with ihis report only if prior notification of this potential requirement was made and accepited, before the analysis. This report is not to be reproduced wholly or in part without special permission in writing. Total liability is limited to the invoice amount. Skinner & Sherman,Inc., Skinner & Sherman Technology, Inc., and/or New England Laboratories name and/or logos may not be used in conjunction with the contents of this report in any advertising media. The results listed refer only to tested samples and applicable parameters. Product endorsement is neither inferred nor implied. Skinner & ShermanLaboraltories. , Inc. wil] exercisedue diligence but wilt not beresponsible for lost or destroyed samples or evidence unless client makes approprialte insurance coverage arrangements. Samples are held for ihirty days following Issuanceof report. Sampleswill be stored at client 's expense, if authorized in writing. • Tml tianc- .0ur '.4, .4±", 4> S3e OriesSc300d Avenu, POt 7, a a ch 0[ 7 8MA 71-800-542-3322pyA, 1i800o547t3322:Outide MAt: TECHNICAL REPORT 02 August 1988 Page 7 of 7 CLIENT: Environmental Applications, Inc. CASE NO: 8807034 Parameter 4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether Hexachlorobenzene Pentachlorophenol Phenanthrene Anthracene Dibutyl phthalate Fluoranthene Benzidine Pyrene Butyl benzyl phthalate 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine Benzo(a)anthracene Chrysene Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate Di-n-octylphthalate Benzo(b)fluoranthene Benzo(k)fluoranthene Benzo(a)pyrene Indeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene Benzo(ghi)perylene Respectfully submitted, SK(NNER AND SHERMAN LABORATORIES, INC. Awinash Manmade, Ph.D. Chemist AM/cd This report is rendered upon all of I he following conditions. Skinner & Sherman Laboratortes. Inc. retains ownership of tis report until associsaled submitted invoice is satisfied. Expert witness services shall beavailable in conjunction with this report only if prior noification of this potential requirement was made and accepted. before she analysis. This reporl is not to be reproduced wholly or in par without special permission in writing. Total liability is limited to the invoice amount. Skinner & Sherman. Inc., Skinner & Sherman Technology. Inc., and/or New England Laboratories name and/or logos may not be usedin conjunction with the contents of this report in any advertising media.The resultslislted refer only to tested samples and applicable parameters. Product endorsement is neither inferred nor implied. Skinner & Sherman Laboratories. Inc. will exercise due diligence but will not be responsible for lost or destroyed samples or evidence unless client makes appropriate insurance coverage arrangements. Samples are held for thirty days following issuance of report. Samples will be stored ai client's expenser,c. if authorizedl in writing. ITMA The ro Analytical nc Skine& Sherma Laborator nc 2 2Avenue, P.OIA5 Maltham,Mas*sachusetts 2. ( 8 0 Sn, -OO 542-332\MA 1-80 5413322 Outside MA A a- I I I I I I I I I I APPENDIX C I ANALYTICAL DATA '3ciBntific * EF I/iCIES Wince 192Z ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMICAL m PHYSICAL ELECTRICAL m METALLURGICAL prepared for Environmental Applications, Inc. Case No. 8808012 STMA Thernno Analytical nc Skinner &Shermnnan Laboratories Inc. 300 Second Avenue, P.O. Box 521, Waltham Massachusetts 02254-0521 (617) 890-7200 1-800-542-3322 M4 1-800-541-3322 OutsideMA TECHNICAL REPORT 09 August 1988 Page 1 of 7 CLIENT: Environmental Applications, Inc. 335 Bear Hill Road Waltham, MA 02154 I Attention: Mr. Joseph Foglio CASE NO: 8808012 REFERENCE: Purchase Order No. 848; C-1191; Lechmere PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Analysis of one composite soil sample for E.P. toxicity metals i plus copper, nickel and zinc; petroleum hydrocarbons, ignitability, corrosivity, reactivity, volatile organics, PCBs and base/neutral and acid extractables. 1 SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION: C-1191 S-1, Elevator Shaft 8/2 11:00 C-1191 S-2, Elevator Shaft 8/2 4:30 C-1191 S-3, Elevator Shaft 8/2 4:30 C-1191 S-4, Elevator Shaft 8/2 4:30 C-1191 S-5, Elevator Shaft 8/2 4:30 1 The above samples were received on 02 August 1988 and composited. METHOD OF TEST: 1 A. E.P. TOXICITY METALS -- The composite sample was extracted and analyzed according to Methods cited in SW-846, Third Edition. The analysis was performed using a Thermo Jarrell-Ash ICAP61 Inductively Coupled Plasma Spectrophotometer. Selenium was I analyzed by a Thermo Jarrell-Ash Video 22 Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometer. Mercury was determined by a Spectro Products Hg-4 mercury analyzer with a Thermo Jarrell-Ash AVA 400 cold vapor I generator. QUALITY CONTROL STATEMENT: The instruments are calibrated daily using EPA traceable materials. Quantitation is performed by the external standards method. Method blanks, duplicate samples and spiked samples are analyzed to insure accuracy, reproducibility and freedom from interferences and matrix effects. B. PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS -- Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, Methods 503D and 503E (16th Edition, 1985). C. CORROSIVITY -- The pH of the sample was determined according to Method 9045 of SW-846 (Electrometric Procedure Soil pH). SD. IGNITABILITY (FLASHPOINT) -- The flashpoint of the sample was done in accordance with ASTM D93 Pensky-Martens Closed Cup, mo diLst, i e deed u.on air of the following conditions: Skinner &Sherman Laratorimes. Inc. relas ownershhpef ,us eor...uniassociaed submi ed n.voce is satisfied. Expert witness services shall beavailable in conJunction with this report only if prior notification of this potental requirement was made and accepted,. before the analysis.This report is not to bereproduced wholly or in part without specialpermission in writing. Totlal liability is limited to the invoice amoun,. Skinner & Sherman.Inc., Skinner & ShermanTechnology. Inc.. and/or New England Laboratories nameand/or logrosmay not be used in conjunction with the contents of this reporl in any advertising media. The resultslisted refer only to testedsamples and applicable parameters. Product endorsementis neither inferred nor implied. Skinner & ShermanLaboralories, Inc. will exercise due diligencebut will nol beresponsible for lostor destroyed samplesor evidenceunless client makesappropriacte insurance coveragearrangements. Samples are held for thirly days following issuanceof report. Sampleswill Ie sored a client ' s expense,if authorized in writing. ThermoAnalytical inc. SkinnerS&Sherman Labortoes In. :' 3OO....A' - " Skinner&Shennan LaboratoriesInc- -- 3005econdA enueP.O B521Waitha6rMassachusettO 2254-0527 (617) 890 7200 1-800-542-3322&A 1-800-541-3322 Outside MA TECHNICAL REPORT 09 August 1988 Page 2 of 7 CLIENT: Environmental Applications, Inc. CASE NO: 8808012 E. REACTIVITY -- The sample was prepared in accordance with SW-846 and analyzed by Methods 9010 for cyanide and 9030 for I sulfide. F. PCBs -- The sample was prepared by Method 3550 (Sonication Extraction) and analyzed by Gas Chromatography according to Method 8080. G. VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS -- The sample was prepared by Method 5030 and analyzed by Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectroscopic Method 8240 for determination of volatile organic pollutants by the purge and trap technique. H. BASE/NEUTRAL AND ACID EXTRACTABLES -- The sample was prepared by Method 3550 (Sonication Extraction) and analyzed by Method 8270 1 by Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectroscopy for semivolatile compounds. Quality assurance procedures for GCMS include daily tuning and I calibration of the mass spectrometer and the use of surrogate standards in each sample to monitor method performance. Quantitation is performed by the internal standard method. 1 Analysis of blanks, duplicate samples and standards are run frequently as further quality assurance procedures. RESULTS: A. E.P. TOXICITY METALS AND NICKEL, COPPER AND ZINC -- Results are reported in milligrams per liter (ppm) in the extract. SArsenic <0.010 Barium 0.500 Cadmium <0.005 I Chromium <0.020 Copper <0.020 Lead 0.086 Mercury <0.0002 I Nickel 0.025 Zinc 0.230 Silver <0.020 Selenium <0.005 I This report is rendered uponall of the following conditions Skinner & ShermanLaboratories. Inc. retainsownership of his report until assiocuaedsubmitted sinvoine is satisfied. Exper witness servicesshall beavailable in conunction with this reportonly if prior notification of this potential requirtenl was madeand accepted before the analysis.This report is not to be reproducedwholly or in parr without specialpermisson .in writing. Total liability is limited to th invoice amount Skiner & Sheman, Inc.. Skinner & ShermanTechnology. Inc., and/or New England Laboratories name and/or logosmay not beused in conjunction with the conlealesof this report in any adveising media. The resultslisted refer only to testedsamples and applicable parametersProduct endorsement is neitherinferred nor implied Skinner & Shermian aboratories, Inc. wnlteaecise due diligencebut will not beresponsible for lost or destroyed samplesor evidenceunless client makesappropriate insurancecoverage arrangements, Samples are held for thirty days following issuance of report. Sampleswill be stored at client's exspense, if amlborized in wreting. a - ~ .. 2 4. i TECHNICAL REPORT 09 August 1988 Page 3 of 7 CLIENT: Environmental Applications, Inc. I CASE NO: 8808012 B. TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS -- 4670 mg/kg on dry weight i basis. C. PH -- The pH of the soil sample was found to be 8.0. i D. IGNITABILITY (Pensky-Martens Flashpoint, OF): No flash to 200 0F. Testing discontinued @ 2000F. 1 E. REACTIVITY: I Sulfide, as releasable H S <10 mg/kg Cyanide, as releasable HCN <1 mg/kg I F. PCB's No PCBs were detected in the soil sample. The detection limit is about 1 mg/kg (dry solids basis) calculated as Aroclor 1242 and 1254. G. VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS I The parameters for volatile organics are listed in Table 1. The detection limit for halogenated and aromatic compounds is 0.1 1 mg/kg (ppm). RESULTS: i Table 1. Volatile Organics Parameter Concentration in Sample (mg/kg) Chloromethane ND I Vinyl Chloride ND Bromomethane ND Chloroethane ND I Trifluorochloromethane ND Acetone ND 1,1-Dichloroethene ND Carbon Disulfide ND Methylene Chloride ND trans-1, 2-Dichloroethene ND I This report is renderedupon all of he followmngcondit ions Skinner & ShermanIaboralories. Inc. retains ownership of this report until associated submitted invoice ssatisfied. Experi witness srvces shall be availablhein conjunction with this report on1, ift prior nottfication of Ihis potential requirement was made and accepted, before the analysis,This report is not to be reproduced wholly or in part without specialpermission in writing. Total liabiliy is limited to the invoice amount. Skinner & Sherman,Inc.. Skinner & ShermanTechnology. Inc.. and/or New England Laboratories nameand/or logosmay not be used in conjunction with the contents of Ibis report in any advertising media. The resultslisted refer only to testedsamples and applicable parameters.Product endorsementis neither inferred nor implied. Skinner & ShermanLaboratories. Inc. .11 exercise due diliensce but wit1 nor be responsible for lostor destroyed samplesor evidence unlesa client makesappropriate insurance coverage arrangetents. Samplesare held for thirty days followig issuance of report Sampleswill be stored at clieni's expenase.if auihorized in wriling. Thenrmo Analytical Inc .mkineri eran Laboratores Inc- -300 SecondAvenue P. Box21 WalthamfMassachusetto 720- S . -1-800-542-3322A 1-800-541-3322 Outjde MA ' I TECHNICAL REPORT I 09 August 1988 Page 4 of 7 CLIENT: Environmental Applications, Inc. 3 CASE NO: 8808012 3 Parameter Concentration in Sample (mg/kg) 1,1-Dichloroethane ND Vinyl Acetate ND 2-Butanone ND Chloroform ND 1,1,l-Trichloroethane ND I Carbon Tetrachloride ND Benzene 41 1,2-Dichloroet hane ND I Trichloroethene ND 1,2-Dichloropropane ND Bromodichloromethane ND S2-Chloroethyl Vinyl Ether ND 4-Methyl-2-pentanone ND cis-l1,3-Dichloropropene ND I Toluene 120 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ND 1,1,2-Trichloroethane ND 2-Hexanone ND Tetrachloroethene ND Dibromochloromethane ND Chlorobenzene ND Ethylbenzene 7.3 m-,p-Xylene 264 o-Xylene 36 I Styrene 22 Bromoform ND S1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ND 1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND 1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND 1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND I Tr - Trace ND - Not Detected I This report is rendered upon all of the following conditions: Skinner & Sherman Latoratories. Inc. retains ownership of this report until associated submitted invoice is satisfied. aert witness servicesmshall be available in conjunction with this report only if prim notification of this lpotentialrequirement was made and accepted. before the analysis. This report is not to be reproduced wholly or in par, without spectal permission in writing. Total liability is limited to the invoice amount. Skinner & Sherman.Inc., Skinter & Sherman Technology, Inc., and/or New England Laboratorien name and/or logos may no be used in conjunction with the coindtentsof this report in any advertising media. The resultslisted refer only to tested samplesand applicable parameters. Product endorsseam is lneitherinferred nor implied. Skinner & Sherman Laboratories, Inc. will estcise due diligence but will not beresponsible for los or destroyed samples or evidence unless client makesappropriate insurance coveragearrangements. Samplesare held for thirty days following issuance of report. Samples will be stored at client's expense. if authorized in writing. U TECHNICAL REPORT 09 August 1988 Page 5 of 7 SCLIENT: Environmental Applications, Inc. CASE NO: 8808012 H. SEMIVOLATILE BASE/NEUTRAL AND ACID EXTRACTABLE COMPOUNDS The parameters for base/neutral and acid extractables are listed in Table 2. The detection limit for most of these compounds is approximately 5 mg/kg (ppm). Table 2. Base-Neutral and Acid Extractables in Soil Parameter Concentration in Sample mg/kg (ppm) I N-Nitrosodimethyl amine ND Phenol ND Aniline ND S2-Chlorophenol ND Bis (2-chloroethyl)ether ND 1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND 1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND Benzyl alcohol ND 1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND 2-Methylphenol ND Bis(2-chloroisopropyl ) ether ND I 4-Methylphenol ND N-Nitrosodi-n-propyl amine ND Hexachloroethane ND Nitrobenzene ND Benzoic acid ND Isophorone ND I 2-Nitrophenol ND 2,4-Dimethylphenol ND I I I I This report is rendered upon air of I hefollowing conditions: Skinner & ShermanLaboralories. Inc. retains ownership of this report until assoctated submitted invoice is satisfied. Expert.witness services shall be available in conjunction with this repori only if prior notnfication of this potential requirement was made and accepited. before the analysis. This report is not to be reproduced wholly or in part without special permission in writing. Total liability is limited to the invoice amount. Skinner & Shermana.Inc.. Skinner & Sherman Technology. Inc., and/or New England Laboratories name and/or logos may nol be used in conjunction with the contents of this report in any advertising media. The results listed refer only to testedsamples and applicable parameters.Product endorsement is neither inferredl nor implied. Skinner & Shaman Laboratories Inc. will exercise due diltigence but will not be responsible for lost or destroyed samples or evidence unless client makes appropriate insurance coverage arrangements. Samples are held for thirty days following issuance of report. Samples will be stored at client's expense, if authorized in writing. kinner & Sherman LaboratoriesI 300 SecondAvenue O 52 Walt1 Massacusettso2 0 520 .1800-542-3322 MA 7-800-54-3322 Outside MA1> W TECHNICAL REPORT 09 August 1988 Page 6 of 7 SCLIENT: Environmental Applications, Inc. CASE NO: 8808012 1 Parameter Concentration in Sample (mg/kg) Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane ND 2,4-Dichlorophenol ND I Naphthalene 200 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND 4-Chloroaniline ND Hexachlorobutadiene ND 4-Chloro-3-methylphenol ND 2-Methylnaphthalene 110 Hexachlorocylopentadiene ND 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol ND I 2,4,5-Trichlorophene ND 2-Chloronaphthalene ND 2-Nitroaniline ND I Dimethyl phthalate ND Acenaphthylene 47 2,6-Dinitrotoluene ND 3-Nitroaniline ND Acenaphthene 10 2,4-Dinitrophenol ND 4-Nitrophenol ND Dibenzofuran 46 2,4-Dinitrotoluene ND Fluorene 77 Diethylphthalate ND 4-Nitroaniline ND 4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether ND 2-Methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol ND I N-Nitrosodiphenylamine ND Azobenzene ND I I This report isrendered upon all of he following conditions: Skinner & Sherman Laboratories. Inc. retatns ownership of this report until associated submitted invoice issatisfied. Expert witness services shall be available in conjunction with this report only if prior notification of this potential roquirenmetwas made and accepted. before the analysis. This report is not to be reproduced wholly or in panrt withouI special permission in writing. Total liability is limited to theinvoice amount. Skinner & Sherman. Inc., Skinner & Sherman Technology, Inc., and/or New England Laboratories name and/or logos may not be used in conjunction with the contents of this report in any advertising media. The results listed refer only to tested samples and applicable parameters. Product endorsement is neither inferred nor implied. Skinner & Sherman Laboratories, Inc. will exercise due diligence but will not beresponsible foelost or destroyed samples or evidence unless client makes appropriate insurance coverage arrangements. Samples are held for thirty days following issuance of report. Samples will beIstored at client's expense, if autihonzed in writing. ITMThermo Analytical Inc Skin SherdIaabones ve n c t 2254 2 (617) 2 ,, . 0 7 -0-523 MA 1-800 5s413322 OtieM * TECHNICAL REPORT 09 August 1988 Page 7 of 7 CLIENT: Environmental Applications, Inc. CASE NO: 8808012 Parameter Concentration in Sample (mg/kg) S4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether ND Hexachlorobenzene ND Pentachlorophenol ND I Phenanthrene 140 Anthracene 57 Dibutyl phthalate ND Fluoranthene 102 Benzidine ND Pyrene 88 Butyl benzyl phthalate ND 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine ND I Benzo(a)anthracene '111 Chrysene 83 Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate ND SDi-n-octylphthalate ND Benzo(b)fluoranthene ND Benzo(k)fluoranthene ND I Benzo(a)pyrene 46 Indeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene ND Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene ND Benzo(ghi)perylene ND Respectfully submitted, SKINNER AND SHERMAN LABORATORIES, INC. Awinash Manmade, Ph.D. Chemist I AM/cd I I This report is rendered upon all of the following conditions: Skinner & Sherman Laboratories. Inc. retains ownership of this report until associated submitted invoice assatisfied. Expert witness services shall be available in conjunction with thlis report only if prior notification of this potential requirement was made and accepted. before the analysis. This report is not to be reproduced wholly or in part without special permission in writing. Total liability is limited to the invoice amount. Skinner & Sherman. Inc.. Skinner & Sherman Technology. Inc.. and/or New England Laboratories name and/or logos may not be used in conjunction with the contents of this report in any advertising media. The results listed refer only to tested samples and applicable parameters. Product endorsement is neither inferred nor implied. Skinner & ShermanLaboratories. Inc. will exercise due diligence, but will not beresponsible for lost or destroyed samples or evidence unlessclient makes appropriate insurance coverage arrangements. Samples are held for thirty days following issuance of report. Sampleswill be stored at client's expense, if auithoried in writing. I ri A . . . . A. 'j Thermno Analytical In . I Skinner &Siierrn a toesn3Aen si 3 APO."Boxik521; a- Skine&Shermaa tie A P.O 521,4Wal ;Ma tts02254-0521 (61)8907200 .'1-8005413322 Outside MA ' APPENDIX D CERTIFIED WASTE RECIEPTS t SCA CHEMICAL SERVICES, INC. (716) 754-8231 4 1550 Balmer Road P.O. Box 200 Model City, New York 14107 GROSS b •UTMER 71060 Ib WORK ORDER /' > TARE PROFILE 7 HAULER 8 c- 34960 1 b TRUCK NUMBER 4 TRAILER NUMBER //J' NET SCHEDULE TIME RECEIVING: TIME IN '35;TIME OUT INITIALS k EXPLANATION LAB: TIME IN TIME OUT C1 ()j INITIALS EXPLANATION v- /" PROCESSING: TIME IN /1 3& TIME OUT///" INIlA-ES EXPLANATION OTHER: TIME IN TIME OUT INITIALS EXPLANATION DRIVER SIGNATURE_ DEPARTURE TIME 125- PLANT MANAGER SIG. DATE /b I/se TOTAL CHARGES TO BE BILLED BASE PRICE DETENTION (excess time ) SPOTTING (No. of Days ) WASHING OFF SPECS ( ) (see attached) OTHER TOTAL CT-230 SCA CHEMICAL SERVICES, INC. (716) 754-8231 1550 Balmer Road P.O. Box200 S e ." Model City, New York 14107 GROSS CUPTOMER 69320 1 b / 3*g&7 WORK ORDER - TARE PROFILE / 73 5&Z 33540 b HAULER 3S0[ TRUCK NUMBER TRAILER NUMBER Db SCHEDULE TIME RECEIVING: TIME IN 9l9C--TIME OUT INITIALS EXPLANATION LAB: TIME IN TIME OUT. INITIALS EXPLANATION PROCESSING: TIME IN/AS79 TIME OUT //- - INITezS EXPLANATION OTHER: TIME IN TIME OUT INITIALS EXPLANATION DRIVER SIGNATURE_ - DEPARTURE TIME 11,4-7L-' A- PLANT MANAGER SIG. DATE /0/31I TOTAL CHARGES TO BE BILLED BASE PRICE DETENTION (excess time ) SPOTTING (No. of Days ) WASHING -OFF SPECS ( ) (see attached) OTHER TOTAL SCA CHEMICAL SERVICES, INC. (716) 754-8231i S. 1550 Balmer Road P.O. Box 200 Model City, New York 14107 GROSS CUSTOMER JL, 72800 lb WORK ORDERAWORK ORDER % z TARE 34920 1 b PROFILE H'75s 2- HAULER 13Ft -3-7 ?S TRUCK NUMBER 0 2- TRAILER NUMBER '/ - NET SCHEDULE TIME RECEIVING: TIME IN / .09A- TIME OUT INITIALS EXPLANATION LAB: TIME IN EXPLANATION PROCESSING: TIME IN ///0 TIME OU / -'_ IRM- I EXPLANATION OTHER: TIME IN TIME OUT INITIALS EXPLANATION DRIVER SIGNATURE Rr6E TIME PLANT MANAGER S G. DATE_ 1,u I - TOTAL CHARGES TO BE BILLED BASE PRICE DETENTION (excess time ) SPOTTING (No. of Days ) WASHING OFF SPECS ( ) (see attached) OTHER STOTAL CT-230 CHEMICAL SERVICES, INC. S (716) 754-8231 1550 Balmer Road P.O. Box 200 Model City, New York 14107 GROSS CUSTOMER 71320 1 b WORK ORDER TARE 358830 I b PROFILE H73s2 HAULER TRUCK NUMBER 8-/ TRAILER NUMBER )//i 3544o SCHEDULE TIME RECEIVING: TIME IN/9:0SA- TIME OUT INITIALS EXPLANATION LAB: TIME IN TIME OUTJ)OQ~ INITIALS EXPLANATION PROCESSING: TIME IN // __ TIME OUT // -Z INITADSL EXPLANATION OTHER: TIME IN TIME OUT INITIALS EXPLANATION DRIVER SIGNATURE . . DEPARTURE TIME I/cl PLANT MANAGER SIG._ DATE //3 /f TOTAL CHARGES TO BE BILLED BASE PRICE DETENTION (excess time ) SPOTTING (No. of Days ) WASHING OFF SPECS ( ) (see attached) OTHER TOTAL I.,, '• . SSCA CHEMICAL SERVICES, INC. (716) 7544-231 Balmer Road .1550 P.O. Box 200 Model City, New York 14107 GROSS CUSTlR - 68980 l b WORK ORDER /175 S& a TARE 35040 l b PROFILE Z-90 I HAULER 8Fc / 3 3-7- o TRUCK NUMBER 332 TBALER NUMBER b/2z NET ISCHEDULE TIME.- TIME IN/&.SZA MIME OUT INITIALS I RECEIVING: I EXPLANATION LAB: TIME IN TIME OUT //.. INITIALS EXPLANATION IPROCESSING: TIME IN /L/ TIME OUT / N-ITI A EXPLANATION IOTHER: TIME IN TIME OUT INITIALS EXPLANATION I DRIVER SIGNATURE_ .. A. DEPARTURE TIME j PLANT MANAGER SIG. DATE /0 /3 / iv TOTAL CHARGES TO BE BILLED BASE PRICE DETENTION (excess time. ) SPOTTING (No. of Days ) WASHING OFF SPECS ( ) (see attached) OTHER TOTAL CT-230...... SCA CHEMIPAL SERVICES, INC.. s716)s4-821 1550BalmerRoad -P.O. Box 200 Model City, New York 14107 GROSS CUSTOMER MOC - . 73480 1 b WORK ORDER 3 Z/ TARE PROFILE H 75 5A 35560 1 b HAULER SFC 331- TRUCK NUMBER d5- ? TRAILER NUMBER L /27' NET SCHEDULE TI$E_ RECEIVING: TIME IN/0:48A-- TIME OUT INITIALS mc EXPLANATION LAB: TIME IN TIME OUT INITIALS EXPLANATION PROCESSING: TIME IN TIME OU INIAL EXPLANATION OTHER: TIME IN TIME OUT INITIALS EXPLANATION I DRIVER SIGNATURE - DEPARTURE TIME / oz a PLANT MANAGER SIG. DATE /30 1 &' TOTAL CHARGES TO BE BILLED BASE PRICE DETENTION (excess time) SPOTTING (No. of Days) WASHING OFF SPECS ( ) (see attached) OTHER TOTAL CT-230 SCA.CHEMICAL SERVICES* INC. (716) 754-8231 15501.~ Balmer Road - MeC~y,o~ P.O.e Box Model City, New York 14107 GROSS CUSTOMR, 70840 1 b /3 k?27z TARE I WORK ORDER -PROFILE H7s2- lb. SHAULER FC- 34 -0 I7.qq TRY,1 TRUCK NUMBER (06 S TRAILER NUMBER 2 NET SCHEDULB TIME RECEIVING: TI ME IN .Z TIME OUT T INITIALS EX PLANATION p LAB: TIEN TIME OUT_ INITIALS EXPLANATION IPROCESSING: TIME IN ,ji TIME OUTKL INIT4AS EXPLANATION I IOTHER: TIME IN TIME OUT INITIALS EXPLANATION DRIVEl SIGNATURE_ . A/ -- DEPARTURE TIME /0o/ IPLANT MANAGER SIG. DATE // )S TOTAL CHARGES TO BE BILLED A- J BASE PRICE DETENTION'Texcessyr time ) SPOTTING (No. of DayA ) WASHING OFF SPECS ( ) (see attached) OTHER TOTAL CT-230 SCA CHEMICAL SERVICES, INC. (716) 7s4-82s1 r -1550 Batmer Road + P.O. Box 200 4 .. I Model City, New York 14107 GROSS I CUSTOMER 69080 1 b I WORK ORDER I 3 2-13 TARE 31920 lb 4-73S& _ PROFILE HAULER SF- /NETt5 -rDz. TRUCK NUMBER (abZ7 TRAILER NUMBER D72- NET SCHEDULE TIME .c RECEIVING: TIME IN 05*0 TIME OUT INITIALS EXPLANATION LAB: TIME IN EXPLANATION * PROCESSING: TIME IN TIME OUT I A EXPLANATION IOTHER: TIME IN TIME OUT INITIALS EXPLANATION AC>1 DRIVER SIGNATURE_ Ai/2id DEPARTURE TIME__ //Oo - SPLANT MANAGER SIG. _ DATE / I /-I ' TOTAL CHARGES TO BE BILLED BASE PRICE DETENTION (excess time ) SPOTTING (No. of Days ) WASHING OFF SPECS ( ) (see attached) OTHER TOTAL CT-230 it.CA CHEMICAL SERVICES, INC. . (716)754-8 231 -"1550Balmer Road P.O. Box 200 Model City, New York 14107 ' CUSTOMER' JgsJA-r- GROSS 6,6660 1 b WORK ORDE R 3&d94- TARE 337,60 PROFILE c O00- HAULER 302-- I,.4C TOD TRUCK NUMBER 66/Z TRAILER NUMBER A NET I SCHEDULE TIM SRECEIVING: TIME IN tr TIME-OUT- INITIALS (di EXPLANATION I LAB: TIME IN TIME OUT INITIALS EXPLANATION SPROCESSING: TIME IN/273 ME OU j \ INIfA EXPLANATION / I I OTHER: - TIME IN TIME OUT INITIALS I EXPLANAION DRIVER SIGNATURE / DEPARTURE TIME /l4 PLANT MANAGER I DATE / - /-i- TOTAL CHARGES TO BE BILLED BASE PRICE DETENTION (excess time ) SPOTTING (No. of Days_ ) WASHING OFF SPECS ( ) (see attached) OTHER TOTAL CT-230 SCA CHEMICAL SERVICES; INC. (716).754-8231 1550 Balmer Road P.O. Box 200 SModel City, New York 14107 GROSSGROSS/ -/ CUSTOMER "rt HLvAtt 72540 1 b / 3&25 WORK ORDER TARE a 36940 1 b PROFILE // 73SS HAULER c7,6t TRUCK NUMBER &'h TRAILER NUMBER 6 NET SCHEDULE TIME A- RECEIVING: TIME IN ?33A-04 TIME OUT INITIALS EXPLANATION LAB: TIME IN TIME OUT_ 9 )j INITIALS I EXPLANATION IPROCESSING: TIME IN Z- TIME OUT j/ /j INITXALS- W I EXPLANATION OTHER: TIME IN TIME OUT INITIALS I EXPLANATION 14 1 / A . DRIVER SIGNA NV?-- DEPARTURE TURE , TIME /: /SA-- IPLANT MANAGER SIG. DATE //////' TOTAL CHARGES TO BE BILLED BASE PRICE DETENTION (excess time ) SPOTTING (No. of Days ) WASHING OFF SPECS ( ) (see attached) OTHER TOTAL CT-230 SCA CHEMICAL SERVICES, INC. (716)e75s4- I.,' 1550 Balmer Road P.O. Box 200 Model City, New York 14107 GROSS CUSTMER 73620 1 b WORK ORDER Z- TARE 35400 1 b PROFILE 5 r~ HAULER L g-2220 v TRUCINUMBER CC TRIt&NUMBER// 3 SCHEDULE) TIME TIME INd t' tIME OUJ IWTfALS I RECEIVING: I EXPLANATION LAB: TIME IN TIME OUTt f) INITIALS I EXPLANATION IPROCESSING: TIME IN TIME OUT INITIALS EXPLANATION I IOTHER: TIME IN TIME OUT INITIALS EXPLANATION DRIVER SIGNATURE _da 9 DEPARTURE TIME IPLANT MANAGER SIG. DATE //-/- TOTAL CHARGES TO BE BILLED BASE PRICE DETENTION (excess time ) SPOTTINGr(Nb..of Day __ ) WASHING OFF SPECS ( ) (see attached) OTHER TOTAL CT-230 SC.A CHEMICAL SERVICESi'INC. (716)754-8231: I. - 1550 Balmer Road P.O. Box 200 Model City, New York 14107 GROSS I CUSTOMER L d- n 7 - 79500 1 b IWORK ORDER /3?2917 TARE PROFILE 33690 I b HAULER 5SW TRUCK NUMBER 4 (A TRAILER NUMBER NET zZ.9' --. SCHEDULE-TIME &j RECEIVING: 'IME IN TIME OUT/ -i- INITIALS EXPLANATION C LAB: TIME IN TIME OUT &4 INITIALS C EXPLANATION PROCESSING: TIME IN Z TIME Ou- _ INIT] EXPLANATION I SOTHER: TIME IN TIME OUT INITIALS EXPLANATION ~: TOTAL'CHARGES TO BE BILLED BASE PRICE DETENTION (excess time ) SPOTTING (No. of Days ) WASHING OFF SPECS ( ) (see attached) OTHER TOTAL CT-230 SCA CHEMICAL SERVICES, INC. (716) 754-8231 1550 Balmer Road /P.-O. Box 200 " Model City, New York 14107 GROSS CUSTOMER k- ptLt- E81460 1 b /391/64 WORK ORDEI TARE -5(020 1 b PROFILE /73 56- HAULER /' 4 44O r TRUCK NUMBER /S40 TRAILER NUMBER D/1 NET 3 .Z.Z 7- SCHEDULE TIME RECEIVING: TIME IN9.' / TIME OUT INITIALS >46:) EXPLANATION LAB: TIME IN TIME OUT-'? INITIALS EXPLANATION PROCESSING: TIME IN d $"2 TIME OUT 6 -) INITIAL, , EXPLANATION OTHER: TIME IN TIME OUT INITIALS EXPLANATION 2--7 i-*, 24 DRIVER SIGNATURE__._,., .A ; DEPARTURE TIME in- PLANT MANAGER SIG. DATEDATE 1////, -,.f TOTAL CHARGES TO BE BILLED BASE PRICE DETENTION (excess time ) SPOTTING (No. of Days ) WASHING OFF SPECS ( ) (see attached) OTHER TOTAL CT-230 I' SCA CHEMICAL SERVICES, INC. (716) 754-8231 ' 1550 Balmer Road P.O. Box 200 Model City, New York 14107 CUSTOMER i.-C- GROSS 8:2920 1 b 33860 lb WORK ORDER TARE /-/ 7-35&2- PROFILE Z,IJs - HAULER Z 4,S > Tr..4 TRUCK NUMBER 6(656 TRAILER NUMBER" 1) _ SCHEDULE TIME RECEIVING: TIME IN:02) TIME OUT INITIALS /17 2 EXPLANATION LAB: TIME IN TIME OUT-rF5 INITIALS EXPLANATION PROCESSING: TIME IN ( LJTIME OUT SLW-& INITIALS/ " EXPLANATION /j/ OTHER: TIME IN TIME OUT INITIALS EXPLANATION -L ,3-1;- DRIVER SIGNATURT 1 , " 2)1/ 1 - DEPARTURE TIME 011 PLANT MANAGER SIG. DATE i///"Cl TOTAL CHARGES TO BE BILLED - BASE PRICE DETENTION (excess time ) SPOTTING (No. of Days ) WASHING OFF SPECS ( ) (see &ttached) OTHER TOTAL CT-230 SCA CHEMICAL SERVICES, INC. (716) 754-8231 ". "1550 Balmer Road P.O. Box 200 Model City, New York 14107 GROSS CUSTOMER 4ftuz . 76020 1 b WORK ORDER/3 9C TARE 34960 1 b PROFILE H 73 56 obo---f HAULER 20.53 4v"i TRUCK NUMBER 4 S5 TRAILER NUMBER 7// SCHEDULE TIME RECEIVING: TIME IN7-Ilt TIME OUT INITIALS EXPLANATION LAB: TIME IN TIME OUT 3C) INITIALS EXPLANATION PROCESSING: TIME IN 6