DOCSLIB.ORG

Massachusetts House of Representatives: Upgrading Greater Boston MBTA Rail System St

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Massachusetts House of Representatives: Upgrading Greater Boston MBTA Rail System St. John’s Preparatory School - Danvers, Massachusetts - December 2020 Letter from the Chairs Dear Delegates, My name is Brett Butler. I am a Senior at St. John’s Prep, and I will serve as your chair for the Massachusetts House of Representatives on Railway Service. I have been involved in Model UN at the Prep for 5 years. Outside of Model UN, I am on the SJP Tennis Team, an Eagles’ Wings Leader, a member of Spire Society, a member of the National Honor Society, and a member of the Chinese National Honor Society. The topic of Railway Service has really fascinated me, since my father is an executive in the FTA (Federal Transit Administration), which is part of the DOT (Department of Transportation), and he has been my inspiration for my research into this topic. Also, I am a frequent passenger on the “T” and Commuter Rail (as well as commuter rail and subway services in many different cities such as Washington D.C., Los Angeles, and Montreal). Thus, I recommend that you read through this paper as well as to do your own research on the frequency, extension, and public trust in the Greater Boston Railway Service. Please do not hesitate to email me with any questions or concerns! I will be happy to assist you, and I look forward to meeting you in December! Thank you, Brett Butler ‘21 ([email protected]) Chair, Massachusetts House of Representatives on Railway Service, SJPMUN XV Dear Delegates, My name is Brendan O’Friel. I am a Senior at St. John’s Prep, and I will serve as your chair for the Massachusetts House of Representatives on improving the Boston-area rail system. I have been involved in Model UN at the Prep for nearly 5 years. Outside of Model UN, I play tennis, and I’m involved with the Spanish club and Spire Society (which helps with admissions events). I’m also a member of the National Honor Society and the Spanish National Honor Society. The topic of the rail system in the Boston-area has really fascinated me in my research as a frequent rider of the T and commuter rail myself. Thus, I recommend that you read through this paper as well as do your own research on how we can improve the current rail system in the greater Boston area. Please do not hesitate to email me with any questions or concerns! I will be happy to assist you, and I look forward to meeting you in December! Thank you, Brendan O’Friel ‘21 ([email protected]) Chair, MA House of Reps., SJPMUN XV Description of the Committee The Massachusetts House of Representatives contains 160 members, who represent about 40,000 people each. The Speaker of the House leads this legislative body, and he/she is elected by the members of the House. The MA House, also known as the General Court, has been around since 1630 (malegislature.gov). This committee will be tasked with solving issues with the Greater Boston railway system (Commuter Rail and “T” subway). We plan to focus on the themes of: frequency of stops, extension of different lines for access to more ​ communities, and public trust (safety, quality, and reliability). Out of the 160 representatives there are 127 Democrats, 31 Republicans, 1 unenrolled, and 1 vacant seat. Only Republican and Democrat representatives will be represented in this committee, with roughly the same ratio kept but used on a smaller scale. These will be the parameters for the Massachusetts House of Representatives on Railway Service. Statement of the Problem As a committee, we will focus on frequency, expansion, and public trust in our Greater Boston Railway System (MBTA Commuter Rail and T trolley/subway system). The railway service is in desperate need of expansion to reach more communities surrounding Boston. Many low-income workers rely on public rail service to reach their work, daily, and many of them have to drive long distances to just reach their nearest train stop. This somewhat defeats the purpose of public transportation, by elongating commuting times. The service also needs greater frequency and reliability. Too often, trains break-down, de-rail, etc., causing major delays in service, making people either late to work or late to get home and see their families. Lastly, public trust should be an area of high-focus to this committee. Our public transportation system relies on a high amount of riders, so in order to gain and maintain high ridership rates, the trains need to become safer, more affordable, and of a higher quality, than they currently are. These are the main issues of discussion for our committee, and we will discuss legislation for funding, state budget, and allocating funds for: 1. Safety 2. Affordability 3. Higher Quality Trains Below, we have included notes that go into greater detail on these three main problems. Notes: We are trying to improve the Greater Boston area rail system (MBTA Commuter Rail and T trolley/subway system) so that it is more reliable and more accessible to commuters. Key Themes: ● Frequency of stops. ● Extension of different lines for access to more communities. ● Public trust ○ Safety, quality, and reliability. ● Safety ○ Reducing or eliminating derailments from the track. ○ At night having more transit police/officers. ■ Freedom from theft and assault. ■ Freedom from being profiled by law enforcement. ● Equity in the transit police in subway stations so they are retrained in better security for all people. ● Affordability ○ Consider free or nearly free transportation costs for essential workers and economically disadvantaged. ○ Looking at how much money comes from taxes, fares, and state vs. federal funding. ○ Contract with Keolis. ○ Consider pros and cons of fare prices and taxes to pay for the system upgrades. ■ Taxes: Airports, hotels, rental car systems at major travel hubs, tourism, property, income, gambling, sales. ■ Legislature has limited options based on travel to and from Boston. - Quality: Modernizing the infrastructure system ○ Signaling (electrical and computer systems) ○ Rail car updates or replacement with new cars ■ Seating ■ Noise level with metal grinding ■ Cleanliness ■ Public Announcements on loudspeakers to hear conductor ■ Visibility and signage for passengers ■ Handicapped accessibility History of the Problem The Boston subway was built during the second phase of the Industrial Revolution in Massachusetts. Electric motors, preferred by Americans over coal-power as a cleaner energy source, were first used in Boston trolleys in 1888, before being used for subways starting in 1897. The reason Boston needed a subway system was that it had a problem with congestion in its streets. This was due to overcrowding, blizzards, storms, and the numerous trolleys traversing its narrow streets. City officials believed the best way to alleviate traffic would be to create an underground rail system. The city planned to connect underground tracks with the already existing above ground tracks in South, West, and North Boston. In 1894, the legislature passed an act which allowed for the creation of the Boston Elevated Railway (also called Boston Transit Commission), a private company responsible for building new elevated railway lines and was the first public transportation company in America. Initial construction of the Boston subway included three stations: Park Street, Public Garden, and Boylston; these stops were connected to trolley tracks on the city streets and later to elevated tracks above the city streets (now the green line). In 1901, segments of the Orange line opened and construction began on the East Boston Tunnel (now the Blue Line), which ran under Boston Harbor, and it eventually opened on December 30, 1904. Initial construction of the tunnel cost taxpayers 5 million dollars. Boston Elevated Railway faced financial struggles in 1918 (led the MA General Court to pass the Public Control Act). This act gave a public Board of Trustees the power to impose fares in order to pay for the upkeep of public transit, allowed the board to increase taxes in the 14 towns served by BERy, and provided earnings for BERy shareholders (Brooks). In 1947, the state legislature formed the Metropolitan Transit Authority (MTA) to take over BER. In 1957, the MTA created an expansion of rapid transit along the Newton Highlands Branch of the Boston and Albany Railroad (now known as the D Branch of the Green Line, which provides service between Newton and Boston). The MBTA was eventually voted into law on August 3, 1964, and became the first combined regional transit system in the U.S. In 1965, the Federal Transit Administration helped fund the MBTA’s first modernization projects Copley, Maverick, Prudential, Columbia (now JFK/UMass), Orient Heights, Fields Corner, Government Center, Kenmore, Haymarket, and Arlington stations (since which the FTA has provided the MBTA $3.5 billion to help fund future projects). Currently, the MBTA is one of the largest public transit systems in the country, providing service to roughly 200 cities and towns and hosts over 1 million riders per day on its subways, buses, ferries, and Commuter Rails (“The History of the T”). Here is a Timeline of all Boston-area Transit Projects: 1897: The original subway opens for Green Line trolleys from Allston to Park St. 1898: Park St to North Station is opened with a trolley incline at North Station for all trolleys to the north of the city. 1901: Orange Line opens in four segments: Sullivan Sq to North Station (elevated), North Station to Dover St (Atlantic Ave elevated), Dover St to Dudley Sq (elevated), and a routing through the Green Line subway from North Station to Pleasant Ave. 1904: Blue Line opens as a trolley tunnel from Maverick Sq to Court Sq at Scollay Sq.
Recommended publications
  • NATIONAL HISTORIC LANDMARK NOMINATION NPS Form 10-900 USDI/NPS NRHP Registration Form (Rev

    NATIONAL HISTORIC LANDMARK NOMINATION NPS Form 10-900 USDI/NPS NRHP Registration Form (Rev

    NATIONAL HISTORIC LANDMARK NOMINATION NPS Form 10-900 USDI/NPS NRHP Registration Form (Rev. 8-86) OMB No. 1024-0018 NANTUCKET HISTORIC DISTRICT Page 1 United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form 1. NAME OF PROPERTY Historic Name: Nantucket Historic District Other Name/Site Number: 2. LOCATION Street & Number: Not for publication: City/Town: Nantucket Vicinity: State: MA County: Nantucket Code: 019 Zip Code: 02554, 02564, 02584 3. CLASSIFICATION Ownership of Property Category of Property Private: X Building(s): Public-Local: X District: X Public-State: Site: Public-Federal: Structure: Object: Number of Resources within Property Contributing Noncontributing 5,027 6,686 buildings sites structures objects 5,027 6,686 Total Number of Contributing Resources Previously Listed in the National Register: 13,188 Name of Related Multiple Property Listing: N/A NPS Form 10-900 USDI/NPS NRHP Registration Form (Rev. 8-86) OMB No. 1024-0018 NANTUCKET HISTORIC DISTRICT Page 2 United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form 4. STATE/FEDERAL AGENCY CERTIFICATION As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, I hereby certify that this ____ nomination ____ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property ____ meets ____ does not meet the National Register Criteria. Signature of Certifying Official Date State or Federal Agency and Bureau In my opinion, the property ____ meets ____ does not meet the National Register criteria.
  • CHAPTER 2 Progress Since the Last PMT

    CHAPTER 2 Progress Since the Last PMT

    CHAPTER 2 Progress Since the Last PMT The 2003 PMT outlined the actions needed to bring the MBTA transit system into a state of good repair (SGR). It evaluated and prioritized a number of specific enhancement and expansion projects proposed to improve the system and better serve the regional mobility needs of Commonwealth residents. In the inter- vening years, the MBTA has funded and implemented many of the 2003 PMT priorities. The transit improvements highlighted in this chapter have been accomplished in spite of the unsus- tainable condition of the Authority’s present financial structure. A 2009 report issued by the MBTA Advisory Board1 effectively summarized the Authority’s financial dilemma: For the past several years the MBTA has only balanced its budgets by restructuring debt liquidat- ing cash reserves, selling land, and other one-time actions. Today, with credit markets frozen, cash reserves depleted and the real estate market at a stand still, the MBTA has used up these options. This recession has laid bare the fact that the MBTA is mired in a structural, on-going deficit that threatens its viability. In 2000 the MBTA was re-born with the passage of the Forward Funding legislation.This legislation dedicated 20% of all sales taxes collected state-wide to the MBTA. It also transferred over $3.3 billion in Commonwealth debt from the State’s books to the T’s books. In essence, the MBTA was born broke. Throughout the 1990’s the Massachusetts sales tax grew at an average of 6.5% per year. This decade the sales tax has barely averaged 1% annual growth.
  • 2020 FMCB Annual Report

    2020 FMCB Annual Report

    2020 FMCB Annual Report This report fulfills the requirements of Section 207 of Chapter 46 of the Acts of 2015 specifying that the MBTA Fiscal and Management Control Board (FMCB) report annually on, among other things, the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority’s “own-source revenue, operating budget, capital plan and progress toward meeting performance metrics and targets.” This final report is presented to the Legislature after five and a half years of governance by the FMCB, with just under six months left in our extended term. 2020 was an extraordinary year, marked by an unprecedented global pandemic, nationwide protests, political and racial tensions, and substantial changes in the ways we live and work. Due to the widespread adoption of teleworking and the closure of hotels, restaurants, and other sectors to slow the spread of COVID-19, MBTA ridership fell sharply. By the end of October, Commuter Rail ridership was down 87% compared to 2019, with the system carrying only 8.5% of its pre- COVID morning peak ridership. Ferry ridership stood at 12% of pre-COVID ridership, with the MBTA paying to operate 112 trips daily with an average of seven riders per trip. Ridership at gated rapid transit (subway) stations was still roughly one-quarter of pre-COVID levels. Even bus ridership, which serves our most durable, transit-dependent customers, had fallen to about 45% of the baseline by October. This decline in ridership, of course, had significant implications for own source revenue. In November 2020, fare revenues were down 78% compared to November 2019. Parking and advertising revenues dropped in line with fares, while real estate revenues remained more stable.
  • MARCH 19 Layout 1

    MARCH 19 Layout 1

    Focus at MHA on Still no room Congresswoman Clark respect, integrity, sees value of loan repay compassion at the inn VIEWPOINTS: DITORIAL PROVIDER PROFILE: E : PAGE 5 PAGE 4 PAGE 3 Vol. 40 - No. 3 The Newspaper of the Providers’ Council March 2019 Roundtable Federal, state discussion policy work gone to pot in spotlight he Providers’ Council and Massa- Organizations need to chusetts Nonprofit Network sent Ta joint letter to Congressman update policies, train staff Richard Neal (D-Mass.), Chair of the he legalization of marijuana usage Joint Committee on Taxation, urging in Massachusetts – for both medic- the immediate repeal of the new income Tinal and recreational purposes – is tax on expenses incurred by nonprofits creating new challenges and questions for providing employee transportation for human services providers about use benefits, such as parking and transit by both employees and clients. passes. Together, the Council and MNN Nearly 40 people representing 27 represent nearly 1,000 nonprofit or- Providers’ Council member organizations ganizations throughout Massachusetts. attended an HR Roundtable on Mari- The new tax – officially Internal Rev- juana Legalization Policies and Proce- enue Code Section 512(a)(7) – is a part dures hosted by the Council on Feb. 20 of the sweeping tax code reform passed in Needham to discuss their challenges in 2017 and the first payments will be and learn about best practices. due in a matter of weeks. It imposes a A panel – including attorneys Jeffrey 21 percent tax on nonprofits offering Hirsch and Peter Moser from the law firm transportation-related benefits to em- Hirsch Roberts Weinstein LLP; Senior ployees.
  • Inventory and Analysis of the South Boston Parking Freeze

    Inventory and Analysis of the South Boston Parking Freeze

    Inventory and Analysis of the South Boston Parking Freeze An Interdisciplinary Qualifying Project Submitted to the faculty of Worcester Polytechnic Institute in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Bachelor of Science Submitted By: Roland Cormier Jie Liang Robert Viall David Zuniga Sponsoring Agency: City of Boston Environment Department Air Pollution Control Commission Submitted To: Project Advisors: Kevin Clements Chrysanthe Demetry Project Liaisons: Bryan Glascock Carl Spector Boston Environment Department One City Hall Plaza Boston, MA 02201 Date: April 27, 2007 Abstract The goal of this project was to evaluate the existing status of the South Boston parking freeze and to recommend changes in policy and procedure that will enhance the ability of the Boston Air Pollution Control Commission (BAPCC) to manage the parking freeze and improve its effectiveness in limiting air pollution from automobiles. The team provided an updated inventory of the parking freeze, an analysis of the effectiveness of the off-peak parking policy, and an information flow plan for the permit application process. ii Acknowledgements The team would like to thank all those who have helped us throughout the past seven weeks in completing this project. Special thanks to our sponsor Mr. Carl Spector of the Boston Air Pollution Control Commission for providing the team with his insight and guidance. The team would also like to thank Mr. Bryan Glascock, director of the Boston Environment Department for giving the team the opportunity to work on this project. Thanks to Ms. Carolyn Bennett of the Boston Redevelopment Authority for providing the team with her GIS expertise as well as the GIS map layers needed to complete the project.
  • Transportation Timetables, 1880-2007

    Transportation Timetables, 1880-2007

    MSS #015, page 1 Transportation Timetables, 1880-2007 MSS: # 016 Processed by: Jason Freitas, December 2014 Volume: 10 boxes Abstract: Timetables for railroads, bus companies, airlines, steamship, and boat transportation companies comprise this collection. The collection was accumulated over the course of about fifty years by various individuals. Though the bulk of items date from the 1940’s to the 1960’s, earlier and later periods are also well- represented. The majority of the collection consists of both employee and public timetables from railroads of New England, with other items coming from New York and Canadian railroads, a wide variety of smaller New England railroads, bus and steamship companies, and railway companies that preceded the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority. Collection Creator: Beverly Historical Society, Walker Transportation Collection Provenance: This collection has been amassed through various donors since 1969. Conservation/Processor's Note: The majority of items consist of saddle-stitched booklets and folded pamphlets. Modern items are more likely to be plastic-coated or synthetic paper and in good condition. Items older than the 1960’s are generally more fragile and should be handled with care. Four different box shapes are used to accommodate the variety of shapes and sizes: standard letter-size boxes for booklets and fragile pamphlets, flip-top pamphlet boxes for sturdier pamphlets, flip-top photo boxes for pocket pamphlets under seven inches, and custom-size boxes for unique items. “Folders” in the pamphlet and photo boxes are not actually folders, but dividers that sit in front of the items they describe. Copyright: Request for permission to publish material from the collection must be submitted in writing to the Curator of Collections in the Cabot House of the Beverly Historical Society & Museum.
  • The Development of Political Theory in Colonial Massachusetts, 1688-1740

    The Development of Political Theory in Colonial Massachusetts, 1688-1740

    W&M ScholarWorks Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects 1970 The Development of Political Theory in Colonial Massachusetts, 1688-1740 Ronald P. Dufour College of William & Mary - Arts & Sciences Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/etd Part of the Political Science Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Dufour, Ronald P., "The Development of Political Theory in Colonial Massachusetts, 1688-1740" (1970). Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects. Paper 1539624699. https://dx.doi.org/doi:10.21220/s2-ssac-2z49 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. TEE DEVELOPMENT OF POLITICAL THEORY IN COLONIAL MASSACHUSETTS 1688 - 17^0 A Th.esis Presented to 5he Faculty of the Department of History 5he College of William and Mary in Virginia In I&rtial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts By Ronald P. Dufour 1970 ProQ uest Number: 10625131 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest ProQuest 10625131 Published by ProQuest LLC (2017). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author.
  • Legislative Profiles Spring 2019 |

    Legislative Profiles Spring 2019 |

    Legislative Profiles Spring 2019 | Announcement Inside This Issue This portfolio contains the profiles of all legislators that belong to PG. 2: Forward key committees within the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. PG. 4: House Bill – H.2366 Each key committee will play a role in the review and approval of the retirement bills that have been filed. PG. 8: Senate Bill – SD.1962 PG. 11: Joint Committee on Public Service – Profiles PG. 29: House Ways & Means – Profiles This portfolio is for the members of MCSA to use to determine PG. 63: House Committee on Third Reading – Profiles which members reside within their regions so contact can be made with each legislator for support of both retirement bills. PG. 67: Senate Ways & Means – Profiles PG. 86: Senate Committee on Third Reading – Profiles PG. 92: Talking Point Tips PG. 93: Legislative Members by MCSA Regions FORWARD Many of us do not have experience with advocating for legislation or meeting with our legislative representatives. This booklet was created with each you in mind to assist in determining which members reside within your region or represent your town and city. We request you contact your respective legislators for support of both retirement bills. If you are familiar with the legislative process and your representatives this may seem rudimentary. The Massachusetts Legislature is comprised of 200 members elected by the people of the Commonwealth. The Senate is comprised of 40 members, with each representing a district of approximately 159,000 people. The House of Representatives is comprised of 160 members, with each legislator representing districts consisting of approximately 40,000 people.
  • System Wide Station Security Improvement – Green Line Construction Contract Time Determination (Ctd)

    System Wide Station Security Improvement – Green Line Construction Contract Time Determination (Ctd)

    MBTA Contract No. S99PS04 SYSTEM WIDE STATION SECURITY IMPROVEMENT GREEN LINE MASSACHUSETTS SYSTEM WIDE STATION SECURITY IMPROVEMENT – GREEN LINE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT TIME DETERMINATION (CTD) Prepared for: February 17, 2021 Prepared by Amir Khalafi HNTB Corporation MBTA SYSTEM WIDE STATION SECURITY IMPROVEMENT BD CTD TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. PREFACE ................................................................................................................................................ 3 2. SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................................. 3 3. REFERENCE ............................................................................................................................................ 4 4. METHODOLOGY .................................................................................................................................... 4 5. WORK BREAKDOWN STRUCTURE ......................................................................................................... 5 6. BASIS & ASSUMPTIONS & RISKS ........................................................................................................... 5 7. CRITICAL PATH ...................................................................................................................................... 6 8. CALENDARS ........................................................................................................................................... 6 9. ATTACHMENTS .....................................................................................................................................
  • The Street Railway Journal

    The Street Railway Journal

    b THE Street Railway Journal. • INDEX TO VOLUME XXII. July to December, 1903. McGraw Publishing Co., 114 Liberty Street, New York. 80953 INDEX TO VOLUME XXII. (Abbreviations ' Illustrated, c Correspondence.) A Offic'ers. £rid 'EJeciitiv'e Commitee <..!.'*... *284 Brakes, Air: in Detroit 929, 1034 .. 541 Discussion at Williamsport 811 cSa~ratoga "Convention, Excursion's' r Acceleration: on High-Speed Railways — Exhibitors, .. .404/ *542 New Christensen Sales Agents 46 — v { [Armstrong] 27 S- c — Proceedings? c" I . c cx-l--- i 448,486 Storage, St. Louis 1073 *122 t Test .'.« c ComnseEtc or..'..: L',., r i 409, 4(U Electric (Price, Darling) *587 65 Union Traction Company, Indiana.... ' *981 < Programme ,'.£1.2, '239 —Emergency, Motors as [Gough] r c also Speeds.) c (See e .<. — *18 . < Track, e c Cq.fiyiF.ents on v .c'. t'. c 279 —Emergency used in San Francisco. Accident: Boston & Worcester Railway In- c S'dggosf'ions .<\fe . .. c ." 609 Momentum 399 vestigation 215 Vice-President's 'Address .'»(-..« 449 Pneumatic Slipper (Estler Brothers) . .*173, 24a Brooklyn Elevated 958 Ammeter, Graphical Recording *808 ——Test of the Steiner Distance 395 Responsibility of Barents... 220 to Children, Anniston, Ala., Convertible Cars for *269 Braking: Emergency Stops 905, 1016 Claims, from Burning Trolley Wire, Appleyard Syndicate: Double-Track Curves [Johnson] c807, cl016 Kansas City 44 for Single-Track Roads M88 [Richards] c951 Department Methods in Brooklyn System of Interurban Railways *146 Bridgeport Strike 109, 220 ; *654 [Folds] Armatures (see Motors, Electric). Brighton, England, Trucks at 1004 Maintenance and Champerty in Personal Atlanta, Ga., Semi-Convertible Cars *923 Brillium as Fijel 900 Injury Cases [Brennan] 525 Atlantic City, Destructive Hurricane in *699 British Institution of Civil Engineers, Meet- Open-Car Dangers 1044 & Suburban Railway, Cars for 861 ing of 43 Paris Underground, Details of *TT2 Auburn & Syracuse Electric Railway *636 British Westinghouse Company, Trafford Physical Examination from the Physi- Auckland, N.
  • Albany Bus Terminal Number

    Albany Bus Terminal Number

    Albany Bus Terminal Number Carneous Harvey stacks above-board and sociably, she breathalyse her chest prophesy perilously. Barytic Zacharias dialogues: he denitrifies his moves sorely and carnivorously. Which Jerrome seasons so blind that Scotti walk her ers? Bus from albany to poughkeepsie. Drive electric 3000 in the Albany region a number that has quadrupled over the broad five years. CSXcom Home. From Albany Bus Terminal 34 Hamilton St Albany NY 12207 USA in Albany NY Estimate your taxicab fare & rates Taxi fare phone numbers local rates. Postcard Illinois Terminal Rail Bus 206 undated Illinois Terminal Railroad. HACKETT MIDDLE to ROUTE 06 Albany City. Travelers through the Port Authority's airports bus terminal and bus station are. Please fill it appears you physically arrive today with the day, but never be followed in albany bus terminal of other railroad and surrounding neighborhoods and practice physical bus? However the fastest bus only takes 1 hour 55 minutes Greyhound exterior Bus Paihia to Albany 3 hours 30 minutes The manufacture of buses from Saranac Lake. A number the major roadways including the pristine Island Expressway I-4. Albany on its manufacturer of ways to the best albany bus terminal number of your travel date of booking contact. Get from the number at wanderu? Tickets to ensure they want or buy in schenectady, terminal albany daily by amtrak guest rewards points within united airlines is the best way. Buses run through Capital appeal next to CDTA's headquarters on 110 Watervliet. Albany Bus Stop Trailways Greyhound BusTicketscom. Your Departure Terminal at JFK Airport 1000 AM Kingston Quality soap at Thruway exit 19 114 Route 2.
  • Pullman Company Archives

    Pullman Company Archives

    PULLMAN COMPANY ARCHIVES THE NEWBERRY LIBRARY Guide to the Pullman Company Archives by Martha T. Briggs and Cynthia H. Peters Funded in Part by a Grant from the National Endowment for the Humanities Chicago The Newberry Library 1995 ISBN 0-911028-55-2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ............................................. v - xii ... Access Statement ............................................ xiii Record Group Structure ..................................... xiv-xx Record Group No . 01 President .............................................. 1 - 42 Subgroup No . 01 Office of the President ...................... 2 - 34 Subgroup No . 02 Office of the Vice President .................. 35 - 39 Subgroup No . 03 Personal Papers ......................... 40 - 42 Record Group No . 02 Secretary and Treasurer ........................................ 43 - 153 Subgroup No . 01 Office of the Secretary and Treasurer ............ 44 - 151 Subgroup No . 02 Personal Papers ........................... 152 - 153 Record Group No . 03 Office of Finance and Accounts .................................. 155 - 197 Subgroup No . 01 Vice President and Comptroller . 156 - 158 Subgroup No. 02 General Auditor ............................ 159 - 191 Subgroup No . 03 Auditor of Disbursements ........................ 192 Subgroup No . 04 Auditor of Receipts ......................... 193 - 197 Record Group No . 04 Law Department ........................................ 199 - 237 Subgroup No . 01 General Counsel .......................... 200 - 225 Subgroup No . 02