Amador County Short Range Transit Development Plan 2014

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Amador County Short Range Transit Development Plan 2014 Amador County Short Range Transit Development Plan For Years 2014 through 2019 Final Plan Prepared for the Amador County Transportation Commission Prepared by LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc. AMADOR COUNTY SHORT RANGE TRANSIT DEVELOPMENT PLAN, 2014 Final Plan Prepared for Amador County Transportation Commission 117 Valley View Way Sutter Creek, California 95685 209 • 267-2282 Prepared by LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc. 2690 Lake Forest Road, Suite C P.O. Box 5875 Tahoe City, California 96145 530 • 583-4053 June 19, 2014 LSC #137410 Chapter 8 Amended March 25, 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE 1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................ 1 2 EXISTING CONDITIONS ............................................................................................ 3 Amador County Background and Setting .............................................................. 3 Existing Land Use ............................................................................................... 3 Employment ....................................................................................................... 7 Historic and Current Population ........................................................................... 8 3 EXISTING TRANSPORTATION SERVICES ..................................................................21 Amador Transit ..................................................................................................21 Other Transportation Services in Amador County .................................................34 4 LAND USE AND DEMOGRAPHIC FORECASTS .............................................................39 Long Range Plans and Forecasts .........................................................................39 5 TRANSIT NEEDS AND SURVEY RESULTS ..................................................................43 6 COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS ........................................................................................59 7 AMADOR TRANSIT ALTERNATIVES ...........................................................................71 Service Alternatives ...........................................................................................71 Capital Alternatives .............................................................................................83 Fare Alternatives .................................................................................................84 8 TRANSIT DEVELOPMENT PLAN .................................................................................89 Service Plan .......................................................................................................89 Capital Plan ........................................................................................................93 Financial Plan .....................................................................................................94 Implementation Plan ...........................................................................................97 BIBLIOGRAPHY ..................................................................................................................99 APPENDIX A: Amador Transit Survey Efforts LIST OF TABLES TABLE PAGE 1 Amador County Employment .................................................................................... 7 2 Major Employers in Amador County .......................................................................... 7 3 Amador County Population ....................................................................................... 8 Amador County Short Range Transit Development Plan, 2014 LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc. Page i 4 Amador County Transit Dependent Population by Place .............................................. 9 5 Amador County 2010 Census Housing Data by Place .................................................15 6 Amador County Travel Mode to Work .......................................................................16 7 Amador County Commuter Flow by Community .........................................................17 8 Amador County 2010 School Enrollment by Area .......................................................18 9 Amador County Unified School District 2013 Enrollment .............................................19 10 Amador Transit Ridership by Month ..........................................................................25 11 Amador Transit Ridership by Passenger Type ............................................................26 12 Amador Transit Revenues ........................................................................................27 13 Amador County Local Transportation Fund History ....................................................28 14 Amador Transit Fiscal Year 2012-13 Expenses & Cost Allocation .................................29 15 Annual Operating and Financial Characteristics by Route ...........................................31 16 Amador Transit Fleet ...............................................................................................32 17 Existing Amador Transit Bus Stop Facilities ...............................................................33 18 Amador County Population Forecast .........................................................................41 19 Most Common Boarding Locations ............................................................................46 20 Most Common Alighting Locations ............................................................................46 21 Senior Population in Amador County .........................................................................61 22 Amador Transit Benefit / Cost Analysis .....................................................................69 23 Amador Transit Service Alternatives ....................................................................... 73 24 Potential Limited Express Sacramento Service Schedule ........................................... 77 25 Potential Mid-day Sacramento Service .................................................................... 79 26 Service Alternatives Performance Analysis ..................................................................81 27 AT Fleet Replacement Schedule – Revenue Vehicles ...................................................83 28 Transit Agency Fare Comparison – Fixed Route Service ..............................................85 29 Peer Sacramento Commuter Fares ...........................................................................86 30 Analysis of Fare Increase Alternatives ........................................................................87 31 Fare Alternatives Performance Analysis ......................................................................88 32 Amador County TDP – Estimated Operating Costs .....................................................89 33 Amador County TDP – Estimated Annual Ridership .....................................................90 34 Amador County TDP – Estimated Farebox Revenues...................................................90 35 Amador County TDP – Capital Plan ............................................................................94 36 Amador County TDP – Financial Plan .........................................................................96 LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE PAGE 1 Amador Site and Location Map ................................................................................. 4 2 Amador County Elderly Population Density ................................................................11 3 Amador Low-Income Population Density ...................................................................12 4 Amador Zero-Vehicle Households Density .................................................................13 5 Amador Mobility-Limited Population Density ...............................................................14 Amador County Short Range Transit Development Plan, 2014 Page ii LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc. 6 Existing Amador County Transit Routes ....................................................................22 7 Jackson/Sutter Creek Shuttle ...................................................................................23 8 Amador Transit Sacramento Express ........................................................................24 9 Amador Transit FY 2012-13 Ridership by Month ........................................................26 10 Historical Transportation Development Act – LTF Revenues .......................................28 11 How did you get to the bus today? ............................................................................45 12 Trip Purpose ...........................................................................................................47 13 How will you make return trip? .................................................................................47 14 How often do you ride the bus? ...............................................................................48 15 How long have you been using the bus? ....................................................................48 16 If AT was not available, how would you have made trip? ............................................49 17 If Amador Transit was not in operation, would you be able to stay in your current home? ........................................................................................................49 18 Age of Respondents ................................................................................................50 19 Respondent
Recommended publications
  • The California High Speed Rail Proposal: a Due Diligence Report
    September 2008 THE CALIFORNIA HIGH SPEED RAIL PROPO S AL : A DUE DILIGENCE REPOR T By Wendell Cox and Joseph Vranich Project Director: Adrian T. Moore, Ph.D. POLICY STUDY 370 Reason Citizens Against Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Foundation Government Waste Foundation reason.org cagw.org hjta.org/hjtf Reason Foundation’s mission is to advance Citizens Against Government Waste Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Foundation a free society by developing, applying and (CAGW) is a private, nonprofit, nonparti- (HJTF) is devoted to promoting economic promoting libertarian principles, including education, the study of tax policy and san organization dedicated to educating the individual liberty, free markets and the rule defending the interests of taxpayers in the American public about waste, mismanage- of law. We use journalism and public policy courts. research to influence the frameworks and ment, and inefficiency in the federal govern- The Foundation funds and directs stud- actions of policymakers, journalists and ment. ies on tax and economic issues and works opinion leaders. CAGW was founded in 1984 by J. Peter to provide constructive alternatives to the Reason Foundation’s nonpartisan public Grace and nationally-syndicated columnist tax-and-spend proposals from our state policy research promotes choice, competi- Jack Anderson to build support for imple- legislators. tion and a dynamic market economy as the HJTF also advances the interests of mentation of the Grace Commission recom- foundation for human dignity and progress. taxpayers in the courtroom. In appro- mendations and other waste-cutting propos- Reason produces rigorous, peer-reviewed priate cases, HJTF provides legal repre- research and directly engages the policy als.
    [Show full text]
  • Executive Summary
    2006 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Our MISSION EXPAND PUBLIC TRANSIT SERVICES IN ORDER TO IMPROVE THE EFFICIENCY OF INDIVIDUAL TRAVEL IN THE METROPOLITAN MONTRÉAL AREA. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2006 AMT 3 Our EXPERTISE The Agence métropolitaine de transport (AMT), which began operations on January 1, 1996, is a government agency for metropolitan transportation accountable to the Québec Minister of Transport. Its territory covers 83 municipalities and the Kahnawake Mohawk Reserve; it extends from Saint-Jérôme to Saint Jean-Baptiste along the north-south corridor, and from Hudson to Contrecœur along the east-west corridor. Our varied and COMPLEMENTARY MANDATES Our Planning, coordinating, integrating and promoting public transit services PARTNERS in close collaboration with our partners. Operating the commuter train system and the metropolitan bus system. TRANSIT STAKEHOLDERS Helping to improve the efficiency of metropolitan roads. Ministère des Transports du Québec (MTQ) Planning and constructing extensions to the metro system. 14 transit organizations 3 transit corporations: Participating in financing the operations of the 14 transit organizations • Réseau de transport de Longueuil (RTL) in the region. • Société de transport de Laval (STL) Financially supporting the 10 paratransit organizations now participating • Société de transport de Montréal (STM) in the service integration project. 9 intermunicipal transit councils (CIT): Making our expertise and tools that meet a variety of financing and • CIT de Chambly-Richelieu-Carignan travel management needs
    [Show full text]
  • Réseau Électrique Métropolitain (REM) | REM Forecasting Report
    Réseau Électrique Métropolitain (REM) | REM Forecasting Report Réseau Électrique CDPQ Infra Inc. Métropolitain (REM) REM Forecasting Report Our reference: 22951103 February 2017 Client reference: BC-A06438 Réseau Électrique Métropolitain (REM) | REM Forecasting Report Réseau Électrique CDPQ Infra Inc. Métropolitain (REM) REM Forecasting Report Our reference: 22951103 February 2017 Client reference: BC-A06438 Prepared by: Prepared for: Steer Davies Gleave CDPQ Infra Inc. Suite 970 - 355 Burrard Street 1000 Place Jean-Paul-Riopelle Vancouver, BC V6C 2G8 Montréal, QC H2Z 2B3 Canada Canada +1 (604) 629 2610 na.steerdaviesgleave.com Steer Davies Gleave has prepared this material for CDPQ Infra Inc.. This material may only be used within the context and scope for which Steer Davies Gleave has prepared it and may not be relied upon in part or whole by any third party or be used for any other purpose. Any person choosing to use any part of this material without the express and written permission of Steer Davies Gleave shall be deemed to confirm their agreement to indemnify Steer Davies Gleave for all loss or damage resulting therefrom. Steer Davies Gleave has prepared this material using professional practices and procedures using information available to it at the time and as such any new information could alter the validity of the results and conclusions made. Réseau Électrique Métropolitain (REM) | REM Forecasting Report Contents 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Union Station 2031 Opportunities and Demands Study Union Station 2031 Demands and Opportunities Study
    UNION STATION 2031 DEMANDS AND OPPORTUNITIESUNION STATION STUDY2031 OPPORTUNITIES AND DRAFTDEMANDS FINAL STUDY Fall 2012 March 2011 Union Station 2031 Demands and Opportunities Study Union Station 2031 Demands and Opportunities Study Fall 2012 Prepared for: Prepared by: Metrolinx Halcrow Consulting Inc 20 Bay Street, Suite 901 207 Queen’s Quay W Suite 550 Toronto ON M5J 2N8 Toronto, ON M5J 1A7 +1 416 363 8123 www.halcrow.com i Union Station 2031 Demands and Opportunities Study Contents 1 Introduction ............................................................................................. 1 1.1 Background .................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Purpose and Scope ........................................................................................................ 2 1.3 Related Initiatives .......................................................................................................... 3 2 Study Design Overview........................................................................ 5 3 Existing and Future Rail Travel Market Analysis ............................ 9 3.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................... 9 3.2 A.M. Peak Period GO Rail Ridership by GO Lines ..............................................10 3.3 A.M. Peak Period GO Rail Market Destined to PD 1 by Origin Regions ........11 3.4 A.M. Peak Period Passenger Egress Characteristics from Union Station
    [Show full text]
  • Coordinated Plan 2016-2020
    CoordinatedThe 2016-2020 Plan One Region | One Network | One Plan The Regional Short-Range Transit Plan & Coordinated Public Transit-Human Services 401 B Street, Suite 800, San Diego, CA 92101-4231 | sandag.org Transportation Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................. 1 Background Requirements ........................................................................................................................... 1 Detailed Plan of Overview ............................................................................................................................ 1 CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................ 1-1 1.1 Envisioning a New Regional Short-Range Transit Plan .................................................................... 1-2 1.2 Plan Requirements .......................................................................................................................... 1-3 1.3 A Passenger-Centered Approach .................................................................................................... 1-6 1.4 Performance Monitoring ................................................................................................................ 1-6 1.5 Specific Populations and Plan Components ..................................................................................... 1-6 1.6 Looking Forward ............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • June 2007 Bulletin.Pub
    TheNEW YORK DIVISION BULLETIN - JUNE, 2007 Bulletin New York Division, Electric Railroaders’ Association Vol. 50, No. 6 June, 2007 The Bulletin BRIGHTON LINE CENTENNIAL Published by the New The Brighton embankment south of Glen- maining portion of the cut. The east wall was York Division, Electric wood Road is 100 years old. Until this em- completed in August, 1907. Railroaders’ Association, Incorporated, PO Box bankment was built, trains ran on the sur- The contractor brought a large steam 3001, New York, New face. In July, the Brighton Line will be 129 shovel to Church Avenue. It was able to re- York 10008-3001. years old. It has been in continuous opera- move 1,500 cubic yards a day from the four- tion longer than any part of the New York City track-wide cut. To complete the work by May subway system except the Culver Line, 1, 1907, it was only necessary to remove 987 For general inquiries, contact us at nydiv@ which is three years older. cubic yards a day. electricrailroaders.org Our sources for this article were a newspa- The engineers calculated that the earth re- or by phone at (212) per clipping furnished by member Robert moved from the cut could be used to build 986-4482 (voice mail Wasche, the Edward B. Watson/Arthur J. the embankment as far south as Avenue O. available). ERA’s website is Lonto collection, and the reports of the The earth excavated from the Long Island www.electricrailroaders. Brooklyn Grade Crossing Commission dated Rail Road’s Bay Ridge Division Grade Cross- org.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2018 AC TRANSIT BOARD of DIRECTORS Letter from the Board President
    Annual Report 2018 AC TRANSIT BOARD OF DIRECTORS Letter from the Board President At AC Transit, we are constantly striving to improve the service we deliver to our riders, which requires a considerable investment in capital and operating dollars. As such, we are always looking for ways to fund these improvements and fi nd effi ciencies that can be gained so we can utilize Board President those dollars effectively. Joe Wallace Since a relatively small amount of our budget, approximately 12% of our operating revenue, comes from the farebox, we have to fi nd supplemental funding to maintain the robust service that we deliver and our riders expect. Voters were extremely generous in that regard by overwhelmingly voting to Vice President support transit on two separate occasions. Last year, Bay Area voters passed Elsa Ortiz Regional Measure 3 which will generate $4.5 billion per year to relieve traffi c congestion on Bay Area bridges and improve public transportation systems. Then in November, California voters protected $5.4 billion a year for California transportation projects, including $750 million for public transportation, by rejecting Proposition 6. Director Greg Harper All of these efforts result in a healthy $437 million annual budget that allows us to move roughly 170,000 people around the Bay Area each and every weekday. As someone who is transit dependent and uses public transit daily, I, along with my colleagues on the Board of Directors, are deeply committed to our mission to provide safe, reliable and sustainable transportation, and Director will always make our riders our top priority.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmentally Friendly Linkage System for Kowloon East - Name Organisation Interim Public Consultation”
    Detailed Feasibility Study for Environmentally Friendly Linkage www.ktd.gov.hk/efls System for Kowloon East Interim Public Consultation Contents Page Your Views are Important 1 Study Background 4 The first stage of the Detailed Feasibility Study has been completed, with the most suitable transport mode Connectivity Needs in 8 as the EFLS for Kowloon East being recommended. 2 Kowloon East Public are welcome to express views on the findings and recommendation of the first stage study by 2 July 2017 3 Evaluation of Green 14 for us to proceed with the next stage of study. Public Transport Modes 4 Way Forward 30 Public Consultation 32 5 Activities Study 1 Background To address the various public concerns raised during the preliminary feasibility study (PFS), a detailed feasibility study (DFS) is being conducted in stages to enhance the connectivity in Kowloon East for its transformation into a new Core Business District. 4 5 Study 1 Background 2012- 2014 Evaluate various green The Kai Tak Outline Zoning Plan approved in 2007 has incorporated Public Consultation for PFS public transport modes the alignment of an Environmentally Friendly Linkage System (EFLS) Public generally agreed that there was a need to running within Kai Tak Development (KTD). The 2011-12 Policy 2011 enhance the connectivity in KE. However, there were Address announced that Kowloon East (KE), including KTD, Kowloon diversified views on the proposed elevated monorail A 9-km long elevated monorail system system, alignment, coverage and the implications for Bay and Kwun Tong business areas, would be transformed into with 12 stations was proposed in the Kwun Tong Typhoon Shelter.
    [Show full text]
  • Canadian Railroad Historical Association
    Published bi-monthly by the Canadian Railroad Historical Association " • • L..I:_ &_ •• _ 1 __ ..J_ ...... __ : ____ IIA ____ :_.1.: __ "' ___ -I~ ____ -I I I '~_.L_~_ ._ .. - - . - . -- - ~ - ~ - -- 130 ISSN 0008·4875 CANADIAN RAIL Poslal Perml! No. 40066621 PUBLISHED BI-MONTHLY BY THE CANADIAN RAILROAD HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION TABLE OF CONTENTS How the Interurbans Came Home to British Columbia, Robert D. Turner ...................... .... ........... 131 Montreal's Laval Metro Extension, Denis Vallieres ......... .. ......... .. ............. ............. .. ....... 139 The London & Port Stanley Railway Rembemered, Robert J. Sanduski ............ .. ...... .. ......... ...... 143 Business Car, John Godfrey ..... .............................. ......... ............................... 158 FRONT COVER: On the second to last day of electric operation, London & Port Stanley car No. 10 heads north between the two (typically Ontario) wooden over bridges of Pond Mills Road (almost 4 miles south of London, Ont.). L&PS No. 10 is preseJved at Exporail, Saint Constant, Quebec. BELOW Now back in Richmond, ex B. C. Electric intelUrban car 1220 is seen in an undated photograph at the Tidleyland ElectJic Railway near Chehalis, Washington. Photo RobeJt D. TLlIner collection. For your membership in the CRHA, which Canadian Rail is continually in need of news, stories, EDITOR: Fred F. Angus includes a subscription to Canadian Rail, historical data, photos, maps and other material. CO-EDITORS: Douglas N.W. Smith, write to: Please send all contributions to the editor: Fred F. Peter Murphy CRHA, 110 Rue St-Pierre, St. Constant, Angus, 3021 Trafalgar Avenue, Montreal, P'Q. ASSOCIATE EDITOR (Motive Power) : Que. J5A 1G7 H3Y 1H3, e-mail [email protected] . No payment can Hugues W. Bonin be made for contributions, but the contributer will be Membership Dues for 2007: LAYOUT: Gary McMinn given credit for material submitted.
    [Show full text]
  • Laval À Vélo
    À VIVRE LAVALMunicipal news bulletin – Fall 2018 LAVAL À VÉLO Come pedal along with us! Bruny Surin Page 30 Spokesman Collecte Online Fête de de sang 3 Services 8 la famille 18 LAVAL IN BRIEF DROP ME OFF AT THE RIGHT PLACE! The safest place to drop off children is not always at the school door. police.laval.ca Municipal Agenda City Council meetings Compost sale Change clocks and check smoke alarm batteries Tuesdays—September 4, October 2, September 29, 8 a.m. – 4 p.m., November 6 and December 4—at 7 p.m. in the parking lot at November 4 at City Hall, 1 place du Souvenir. You 1333 boulevard Chomedey can watch live and recorded webcasts Closing of bicycle path Collection of fall leaves at laval.ca. November 14 Dates online: laval.ca, under Citizens/ Laval residents’ blood donor clinic Environment, Recycling and Collections/ Volunteer training day September 7 Collections/Fallen leaves November 24 (page 9) Volunteer tribute banquet Fire prevention week September 11 October 7-13 Municipal Services Enforcement of Bylaw on lawn Open House at fire stations Schedule watering October 13 Some departments and services will Until September 15 be closed for the Labour Day and Installation of temporary Thanksgiving holidays. More details may Mobile eco-centre rounds car shelters be found on Ville de Laval’s Internet site. September 15, in Chomedey Starting October 15 (structure) October 21, in Fabreville and November 1 (cover) laval.ca, under About/Municipal Administration/City Management, Municipal Court and Municipal Services 2 Vivre à Laval — Fall 2018 INDEX S Municipal News section ........................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Economics of Investment in High Speed Rail Summary and Conclusions
    The Economics of Investment in High Speed Rail Summary and Conclusions Discussion30 Paper 2013 • 30 John Preston, University of Southampton, United Kingdom The Economics of Investment in High Speed Rail Discussion Paper No 2013-30 Summary and conclusions Professor John Preston, University of Southampton United Kingdom December 2013 THE INTERNATIONAL TRANSPORT FORUM The International Transport Forum at the OECD is an intergovernmental organisation with 54 member countries. It acts as a strategic think-tank, with the objective of helping shape the transport policy agenda on a global level and ensuring that it contributes to economic growth, environmental protection, social inclusion and the preservation of human life and well-being. The International Transport Forum organises an annual summit of Ministers along with leading representatives from industry, civil society and academia. The International Transport Forum was created under a Declaration issued by the Council of Ministers of the ECMT (European Conference of Ministers of Transport) at its Ministerial Session in May 2006 under the legal authority of the Protocol of the ECMT, signed in Brussels on 17 October 1953, and legal instruments of the OECD. The Members of the Forum are: Albania, Armenia, Australia, Austria, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Canada, Chile, People’s Republic of China, Croatia, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Georgia, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, India, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Korea, Latvia, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Mexico, Republic of Moldova, Montenegro, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Russian Federation, Serbia, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, Ukraine, United Kingdom and United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Coordinated Plan
    The 2018 Coordinated Plan One Region | One Network | One Plan The Regional Short-Range Transit Plan & Coordinated Public Transit-Human Services Transportation Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................ 1 Background Requirements .......................................................................................................................... 1 Detailed Plan Overview ............................................................................................................................... 1 CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 A Comprehensive Coordinated Plan ................................................................................................. 1-2 1.2 Plan Requirements ........................................................................................................................... 1-4 CHAPTER 2: COMMUNITY OUTREACH AND PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT ................................................... 2-1 2.1 Public and Stakeholder Involvement ................................................................................................. 2-2 2.2 Outreach Efforts ............................................................................................................................... 2-4 CHAPTER 3: TRANSPORTATION ASSESSMENT OF THE SAN DIEGO REGION ......................................
    [Show full text]