DOCSLIB.ORG

Wilhelm Wundt & Herman Ebbinghaus Wilhelm Wundt & Herman

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

1 2 Wilhelm Wundt & Herman Ebbinghaus Wilhelm Wundt & Herman Ebbinghaus 1. Wundt 2. Ebbinghaus A. Biographical details A. Biographical details B. Career history B. Career history C. Psychological theories C. Psychological theories D. Impact on Psychology D. Impact on Psychology Setting the Scene… 3 4 (After Darwin, Descartes (d. 1650) – psychologists William James (1890) – we consist of a preferred the study we are not automata; material body & of learning to that of consciousness selects immaterial soul consciousness) (Newton) Copernicus (1543): J.-O. la Mettrie (1748) Charles Darwin (1859) Wilhelm Wundt Sigmund Freud heliocentric theory of the L’Homme Machine – (On the Origin of Species) (1879) established (1899) – unconscious universe – Earth, and humans are just more – evolution by common first lab for study of more important than human race, are not the complex animals descent of all creatures human psychology consciousness centre of the universe Opposing views… 5 6 Humans are special. We’re not just smarter monkeys. Reflective self- consciousness (subjective experience) is unique to humans. It is too Wilhelm Wundt remarkable to have evolved for no reason. It permits selection. It creates (1832-1920) our experience of the world. It makes us care whether we live or die. William James Wilhelm Wundt Humans are not special – we are not the center of the universe. We’re just more complex animals on a little planet in an uncaring universe. Consciousness is not special (in any useful way) – it doesn’t produce our behavior; our behavior issues from unconscious processes shared with animals and generated by brains. Consciousness is an epiphenomenon. 1 7 8 Wundt – A. Biographical details Wundt – A. Biographical details * Born 1832, 4th of 4 children * Began academic career at University of Tubingen * Father a poor village clergyman * First scientific publication at 21 * Ancestors included many scholars – historians, * After father’s death, Wundt went to the famous theologians, geographers on father’s side, natural Heidelberg University to study medicine scientists & physicians on mother’s side * MD degree at 24 from Heidelberg * Lonely and sickly during childhood; did poorly in * Then to University of Berlin – studied under school; unloved at home Müller & Du Bois-Reymond; Lab work under * As an adult, humorless, tireless, aggressive Robert Bunsen *(Anatomy; electrophysiology; chemistry) 9 10 Johannes Peter Muller (1801- 1858) – Physiologist and Emil Heinrich Du Bois- comparative anatomist; Reymond (1818-1896) founder of modern physiology. German physiologist who After teaching medicine at showed the existence of Bonn and anatomy at Berlin, electrical currents in he devoted himself to research nerves, correctly arguing in physiology. Considered the that it would be possible founder of modern physiology, to transmit nerve because of his personal impulses chemically. His contributions to the science experimental techniques and for coordinating the results provided the basis for obtained by his predecessors. almost all future work in Fought against vitalism electrophysiology. 11 12 Robert Bunsen (1811- 1899). Before he was B. Career history twenty years old, Bunsen had obtained his doctorate 1857 – took teaching job at Heidelberg in chemistry at Göttingen University. Bunsen taught 1858 – became assistant in von Helmholtz’s lab at several different 1858-62 – Contributions to the Theory of Sensory universities, including Perception institutions in Marburg and Breslau, before settling at * argued for experimental psychology as a new Heidelberg, where he science taught from 1852 until his 1863 – Lectures on the Minds of Men and Animals retirement, and established an exceptional chemistry * comparative psychology; influenced by Darwin department. 2 13 14 B. Career history B. Career history 1864 – promoted to associate professor 1879 – founded the Psychology Institute – 1867 – began teaching physiological psychology arguably the first experimental psychology lab 1873 – Principles of Physiological Psychology 1881 – founded journal Philosophical Studies. * His magnum opus; huge effect on career 1896 – Outline of Psychology 1874 – having been passed over to replace von 1900-20 – Cultural Psychology: An Investigation of Helmholtz, became professor of philosophy at the Developmental Laws of Language, Myth, and Zurich (Switzerland) Morality published in 10 volumes. 1875 – moved to University of Leipzig, given a 1917 – Retired at age 85 chair in philosophy – with lots of resources 15 16 C. Psychological Theories Introspection Two kinds of psychological research: Study of the elements of consciousness: * Physical phenomena are seen as consisting of A. Lab work – reserved for study of simpler issues chemical structures, that can be broken down * Used introspection into basic elements B. Observation out in the world – for the study of * Analogously, conscious experience can be more complex processes that allow us to be broken down into basic elements – e.g., what social animals (e.g., language) elements is the taste of apple pie composed of? * Influence of Darwin: trace the evolution of * This, Wundt thought, required introspection mind 17 18 Introspection Introspection Wundt began identifying a sort of “periodic table of Elements included: the elements” of conscious experience. Sensations – produced by sense organs * Any experience to be described in most basic * these vary in intensity, modality, duration terms * included simple tone, pressure, heat, cold, * Observer must not describe object itself – doing sour, sweet, salty, bitter tastes, many others so would be an example of the “stimulus error.” * black/white, color saturation, brightness * Eventually, this approach was abandoned – but Feelings – affective value of a sensation it has an echo in the recent work of, for example, Hubel & Weisel on visual feature detectors * pleasant/unpleasant; tension/relaxation; excitement/depression 3 19 20 What happens to these elements? What happens to these elements? Apprehension – process through which individual Apperception: whole is more than sum of parts “impressions” or sensations enter consciousness Apperception is produced by will * will directs attention Association – passive combination of elements * important in 20th century in clinical applications (e.g., Thematic Apperception Test): why does Apperception – active combination of elements person perceive the world this way? and synthesis of new forms * It’s an act of will – why that particular act of * The will has an “organizing” effect will? What does that teach us? * Voluntarism – power of will to organize mental contents 21 22 Introspection - problems D. Impact on psychology Observers were students trained by Wundt Wundt was first person ever to be called a * 10,000 observations before they were 'psychologist‘, and started the first psychology lab. considered trained He also trained much of the first generation of Agreement among observers produced by bias experimental psychologists generated by Wundt’s training But his influenced waned early in the 20th century, Disagreement was resolved by Wundt for several reasons * If two observers disagreed, would Wundt Scientific: decide that the one who agreed with his * introspection not a reliable method interpretation was correct? * cultural psychology had no center, as James said 23 24 5.Impact on Psychology Herman Ebbinghaus (1850 – 1909) Wundt’s influence waned in the early 20th century Historical issues: * Zeitgeist changed after World War I * U.S.A. became leading scientific nation – structuralism had no historical status there Personal issues * Wundt tried to dominate experimental psychology, to be an authority in all things * The historical period of authorities was ending 4 25 26 2. Herman Ebbinghaus (1850 – 1909) 2. Herman Ebbinghaus (1850 – 1909) A. Biographical details B. Career history * born in Barmen, town in Germany known more recently 1885 Published On Memory, his most important work for its religious leaders’ opposition to the Nazis (Barmen 1885 Appointed Professor of Philosophy at the University Declaration, 1934) of Berlin * entered University of Bonn at age 17 * founded an experimental laboratory in Berlin * studies interrupted in1870 by service in the Prussian 1890 founded journal Zeitschrift für Psychologie und Physiologie der Sinnesorgane army during the Franco-Prussian war 1894 Made full professor at Breslau * Ph.D. awarded in 1873 (a study of von Hartmann’s * founded an experimental laboratory in Breslau philosophy of the unconscious) 1905 Became professor at Halle * known for his personal charm & sense of humor 1909 Died of pneumonia 27 28 2. Herman Ebbinghaus (1850 – 1909) On Memory (1885) C. Psychological theories Ebbinghaus wanted to develop a scientific psychology. This goal led to his systematic study * Ebbinghaus now known primarily for his work of memory – the first such study in history. On Memory, the first formal treatment of memory research as an experimental science Important concepts in Ebbinghaus’s work: * Deserves to be better known for his tireless * Nonsense syllable promotion and support of scientific psychology in * Measures of remembering and forgetting its early period, when it was most vulnerable * Savings * Forgetting curve 29 30 2. Herman Ebbinghaus (1850 – 1909) D. Impact on Psychology * Campaigning for a science of psychology independent of philosophy * Campaigning for funds and space * Setting the example of his systematic study of memory * Inspiring generations of memory researchers * Inspired young researchers at a critical time by encouraging views different from his own Source: Encarta http://images.encarta.msn.com/xrefmedia/aencmed/targets/illus/cha/T629030A.gif 5 31 32 E.B. Titchener remembering Ebbinghaus at a conference at Clark University in 1910: Quoted in Fuchs, A.H. (1997) The American Journal of Psychology, 110 (4), 621 – 633. 6.
Recommended publications
  • 'Introspectionism' and the Mythical Origins of Scientific Psychology

    'Introspectionism' and the Mythical Origins of Scientific Psychology

    Consciousness and Cognition Consciousness and Cognition 15 (2006) 634–654 www.elsevier.com/locate/concog ‘Introspectionism’ and the mythical origins of scientific psychology Alan Costall Department of Psychology, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO1 2DY, UK Received 1 May 2006 Abstract According to the majority of the textbooks, the history of modern, scientific psychology can be tidily encapsulated in the following three stages. Scientific psychology began with a commitment to the study of mind, but based on the method of introspection. Watson rejected introspectionism as both unreliable and effete, and redefined psychology, instead, as the science of behaviour. The cognitive revolution, in turn, replaced the mind as the subject of study, and rejected both behaviourism and a reliance on introspection. This paper argues that all three stages of this history are largely mythical. Introspectionism was never a dominant movement within modern psychology, and the method of introspection never went away. Furthermore, this version of psychology’s history obscures some deep conceptual problems, not least surrounding the modern conception of ‘‘behaviour,’’ that continues to make the scientific study of consciousness seem so weird. Ó 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Keywords: Introspection; Introspectionism; Behaviourism; Dualism; Watson; Wundt 1. Introduction Probably the most immediate result of the acceptance of the behaviorist’s view will be the elimination of self-observation and of the introspective reports resulting from such a method. (Watson, 1913b, p. 428). The problem of consciousness occupies an analogous position for cognitive psychology as the prob- lem of language behavior does for behaviorism, namely, an unsolved anomaly within the domain of an approach.
  • Running Head: a REVIEW and EVALUATION of an OPEN 1

    Running Head: a REVIEW and EVALUATION of an OPEN 1

    Running Head: A REVIEW AND EVALUATION OF AN OPEN 1 A Review and Evaluation of an Open-Source Mood Assessment, the Brief Mood Introspection Scale Rachael M. Cavallaro University of New Hampshire Victoria Bryan University of New Hampshire John D. Mayer University of New Hampshire A REVIEW AND EVALUATION OF AN OPEN 2 Abstract The Brief Mood Introspection Scale (BMIS) is an open-source, 16-item assessment of current mood regularly used in psychological research. The scale has two sets of scales: one pair of scales assesses mood using Pleasant-Unpleasant and Arousal-Calm dimensions; the other (less used alternative) assesses mood using Positive and Negative Affect. However, since its publication in 1988, there have been no systematic reports of its usage pattern, norms or of evidence for its validity. The present meta-analysis aims to (1) identify the nature of the studies that employed the BMIS (i.e. research areas and design), (2) establish the norms for the BMIS the scale means, standard deviations, and reliabilities, and (3) evaluate for the BMIS’s validity. One hundred and fifty studies that utilized the BMIS over a five-year timespan (2016-2011) were identified, including 27 studies that reported information pertinent to the scale’s norms. Our findings indicated that BMIS was primarily used in experimental research, and that its norms were similar to those from the original report. We make recommendations for use of Likert response scales and scoring conventions. A more qualitative review suggested that the Pleasant- Unpleasant mood scale had considerable evidence for its validity from its relation to criteria.
  • The Positivist Repudiation of Wundt Kurt Danziger

    The Positivist Repudiation of Wundt Kurt Danziger

    Jouml of the History ofthe Behuvioral Sciences 15 (1979): 205-230. THE POSITIVIST REPUDIATION OF WUNDT KURT DANZIGER Near the turn of the century, younger psychologists like KUlpe, Titchener, and Eb- binghaus began to base their definition of psychology on the positivist philosophy of science represented by Mach and Avenarius, a development that was strongly op- posed by Wundt. Psychology was redefined as a natural science concerned with phenomena in their dependence on a physical organism. Wundt’s central concepts of voluntarism, value, and psychic causality were rejected as metaphysical, For psy- chological theory this resulted in a turn away from Wundt’s emphasis on the dynamic and central nature of psychological processes toward sensationalism and processes anchored in the observable peripher of the organism. Behaviorism represents a logical development of this point orview. I. PSYCHOLOGYAS SCIENCE What makes the early years in the history of experimental psychology of more than antiquarian interest are the fundamental disagreements that quickly separated its prac- titioners. These disagreements frequently concerned issues that are not entirely dead even today because they involve basic commitments about the nature of the discipline which had to be repeated by successive generations, either explicitly, or, with increasing fre- quency, implicitly. In the long run it is those historical divisions which involve fundamental questions about the nature of psychology as a scientific discipline that are most likely to prove il- luminating. Such questions acquired great urgency during the last decade of the nineteenth and the first few years of the present century, for it was during this period that psychologists began to claim the status of a separate scientific discipline for their subject.
  • Introspection Mark Engelbert and Peter Carruthers∗

    Introspection Mark Engelbert and Peter Carruthers∗

    Advanced Review Introspection Mark Engelbert and Peter Carruthers∗ Two main questions about introspection are addressed: whether it exists, and whether it is a reliable source of self-knowledge. Most philosophers have assumed that the answers to both questions are positive, whereas an increasing number of cognitive scientists take the view that introspection is either nonexistent (with self-attributions of mental states being made on the same sort of interpretative basis as attributions of mental states to other people) or unreliable. A number of different models of self-knowledge are discussed, and the evidence bearing on the existence and reliability of introspection is reviewed. New experiments are required to tease apart some of the alternatives. 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. WIREs Cogn Sci 2010 1 245–253 hilosophers have traditionally assumed that the form of noninterpretative access is what is normally Phuman mind is largely transparent to itself.1–3 referred to as ‘introspection.’ (Some reserve the term The thesis of mental transparency can be divided into ‘introspection’ for those cases where one consciously a conjunction of two claims: (1) mental states are self- and deliberately pays attention to one’s mental states.4 presenting (if one is undergoing a given mental state, We will not follow this usage.) then one knows that one is) and (2) our knowledge of A distinction should be drawn between access mental states is infallible (if one believes that one is to our own mental states that is inferential and access undergoing a given mental state, then so one is). The that is interpretive. Many cognitive processes—in- scope of this thesis has generally been restricted to cluding perceptual processes like vision and language current mental events of judging, deciding, reasoning, parsing—are thought to be inferential in that they experiencing, imagining, and feeling, however.
  • Introspecting in the Twentieth Century Maja Spener (University of Birmingham)

    Introspecting in the Twentieth Century Maja Spener (University of Birmingham)

    Introspecting in the Twentieth Century Maja Spener (University of Birmingham) Forthcoming in Philosophy of Mind in the Twentieth and Twenty-First Centuries, A. Kind (ed.), Routledge. This version of the paper is only a draft. For quotation please consult the published version. Introspection in the 20th century is a vast topic. Discussions involving introspection figured in the relatively new discipline of experimental psychology, as well as in various debates in philosophy of mind and epistemology. Introspection has been a focus of interest as a method of investigation and as a psychological and epistemic capacity itself. Over the course of the century, these theoretical interests did not always connect well, although they have intersected and influenced each other at different points. But there is no helpful sense in which one might talk of ‘the history’ of introspection in the 20th century if by that one means a straight line of development across ten or so decades of psychological and philosophical theorizing with, and about, introspection. Instead, there is a criss-crossing pattern of various storylines and what I shall do here is track a couple of different strands in the overall pattern to the exclusion of many others.1 In particular, I shall concentrate on philosophers’ and psychologists’ use of introspection, and the discussions surrounding such use. A story we are often told is that during the late 19th century and the beginning of the 20th century, experimental psychology was synonymous with introspectionism, exemplified by the work of Wilhelm Wundt and E. B. Titchener. According to the story, these early psychologists took the subject-matter of psychology to be conscious states only and their main method of investigation was introspection.
  • The Origins of Psychology

    The Origins of Psychology

    1/28/2013 The Origins of Psychology General Psychology: Chapter 1 Jeffrey D. Leitzel, Ph.D. Why Study Psychology? Psychology investigates a wide variety of questions and attempts to answer them using scientific methods. Psychology helps us evaluate the many so- called psychological facts we encounter everyday. An understanding of psychology will help you to think critically and evaluate scientifically based facts. Definition of Psychology Psychology is a science, the scientific study of the behavior of humans and other animals. Based on the careful application of scientific methods Not just a matter of common sense Deals with people effectively and is only a small part of the science of behavior 1 1/28/2013 Psychology as a Science Latane and Darley (1970) The presence of other people affects our perception of an emergency situation. We tend to diffuse our responsibility to act to others who are present. We are more likely to act when we are alone. This helps explain bystander apathy. The Study of Behavior Contemporary psychologists are interested in studying both observable behavior and mental processes. The Study of Humans and Other Animals Five major reasons for the study of animal behavior: Satisfies the need to find a simpler model Provides greater control Considers ethical issues • Institutional review boards Practicality (cost) To learn more about animal behavior 2 1/28/2013 Psychology’s History Psychology has roots in philosophy. Fundamental interest in the relationship between mind and body Rene Descartes proposed that mind and body are distinct entities that interact at the pineal gland - known as dualism. The physical body was mechanical.
  • Wundt's "New Psychology"

    Wundt's "New Psychology"

    Wundt's "New Psychology" Wilhelm Wundt(1832-1920) was the first professional to call himself a psychologist. He founded one of the first psychological laboratories in Leipzig, Germany, in 1879. Wundt believed the "only certain reality is immediate experience" (Blumenthal, 1975). If psychology were to be a science, then psychologists would have to collect data about experience. To do this, Wundt used procedures similar to those developed by the psychophysicists. He arranged controlled laboratory settings. He carefully administered stimulation such as sounds and sights. He gathered information about how quickly people responded to a stimulus (reaction time) and what they experienced. Wundt believed these experiments would lead to a consensus or agreement among scientists about the nature of experience. Wilhelm Wundt Wundt's approach was not unreasonable. It resembled the way most natural sciences developed in the 1800s. Science like botany and zoology began with careful observation and an effort to arrive at consensual validation (agreement among different observers). For example, biologists began with careful descriptions of plants and animals before trying to classify them. Wundt believed the same approach would work in psychology. Careful scientific observers could simply look inside themselves to see the mind in action, and they should be able to agree on the basic phenomena of psychology. After agreeing about basic observations, they could do a deeper analysis of what they had found. The technique of "looking inside" to gather data about the mind is called introspection . The problem with Wundt's program is fairly obvious to those of us in the modern world, where differences between people are taken for granted.
  • The Nature of Mid-Life Introspection with the Goal of Understanding the Fullness, Or Essence, of the Experience

    The Nature of Mid-Life Introspection with the Goal of Understanding the Fullness, Or Essence, of the Experience

    Copyright 2014, Lee DeRemer Abstract I explore the nature of mid-life introspection with the goal of understanding the fullness, or essence, of the experience. I use research from interviews with nine people who have had deeply personal, highly intentional mid-life introspection experiences. In these interviews I seek to appreciate the motivation of the individuals, the dynamics of the experience, the role of others, lessons learned, and the impact on interviewees’ approach to questions of meaning and purpose. I also interview the spouses of six of the participants to obtain additional perspective on each introspection experience. I employ a transcendental phenomenological methodology to discover whether any aspects of the mid-life introspection experience are common, regardless of differences in world view, background, gender, occupation, education level, or socioeconomic status. By learning the stories of each of these mid-life introspection experiences, I discover the nature of mid-life introspection and develop the following definition of mid-life introspection: a deeply personal quest for a fresh understanding of one’s identity, purpose, values, goals, and life direction, influenced but not necessarily constrained by one’s life history and present circumstances. This research will enable the reader to conclude, “I understand the nature of mid-life introspection and what to expect from a mid-life introspection experience.” The research also reveals a framework that depicts the mid-life introspection experience graphically and a collection of questions that can guide one’s own mid-life introspection. iii Dedication This paper is dedicated to three people. I am who I am because of them, and I am forever grateful.
  • Consciousness and Introspection in Plotinus and Augustine Suzanne Stern-Gillet University of Bolton, S.Stern-Gillet@Bolton.Ac.Uk

    Consciousness and Introspection in Plotinus and Augustine Suzanne Stern-Gillet University of Bolton, [email protected]

    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by University of Bolton Institutional Repository (UBIR) University of Bolton UBIR: University of Bolton Institutional Repository Philosophy: Journal Articles (Peer-Reviewed) Philosophy 2007 Consciousness and Introspection in Plotinus and Augustine Suzanne Stern-Gillet University of Bolton, [email protected] Digital Commons Citation Stern-Gillet, Suzanne. "Consciousness and Introspection in Plotinus and Augustine." (2007). Philosophy: Journal Articles (Peer- Reviewed). Paper 1. http://digitalcommons.bolton.ac.uk/phil_journalspr/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Philosophy at UBIR: University of Bolton Institutional Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Philosophy: Journal Articles (Peer-Reviewed) by an authorized administrator of UBIR: University of Bolton Institutional Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 1 CONSCIOUSNESS AND INTROSPECTION IN PLOTINUS AND AUGUSTINE Suzanne Stern-Gillet I. Introduction Philosophers of mind and philosophical psychologists no longer care to rely on introspection as a method for investigating the human mind. From the early years of the twentieth century, introspection has gradually disappeared from the methods favored by serious philosophers and psychologists. This fading away is the object of William Lyons‟ well-known 1986 book, The Disappearance of Introspection. Curiously, if introspection has all but disappeared from the armory of philosophers and psychologists, it has survived as an exegetical category. It continues to be used routinely in accounts of Descartes‟ epistemology, it is unquestioningly applied to Augustine‟s De Trinitate and Confessions, and it regularly slips from the pen of practically anyone who writes on Plotinus‟ concept of soul, theory of dual selfhood or, indeed, mysticism.
  • Professor Wilhelm Wundt

    Professor Wilhelm Wundt

    —! PROFESSOR WILHELM WUNDT. BY DR. J. BLUWSTEIN. [On August i6 Prof. Wilhelm Wundt celebrated his eightieth birthday. The official oration on that occasion was delivered by Dr. Bluwstein, and we here translate it from advance proofs sent us by the author with the kind permission of Dr. Ludwig Stein, the editor of Nord und Siid, in the August number of which appeared Dr. Bluwstein's address. Ed.] IN this day of most extreme specialization—which only too often means self-imposed limitation—in this day of specialists and spe- cial departments of science, there lives a great man to whom we give only the recognition he merits when we place him in the same cat- egory with Aristotle and Leibnitz. Like them he is master of the immeasurable knowledge of his own age and at the same time has opened up new realms to the inquiring mind. We often think of great men only in their externalities. , .For Wundt his eightieth birthday signifies no conclusion and no cessa- tion from his labors ; for him it is only an incident of the calendar. ... .A day in which so many others would long since have survived their best efforts, in which they would have lost all comprehension of their own better selves, closes one of his most fruitful years. Kleine Schriftcn, Elcmcnte dcr Volkerpsychologie, the sixth revised and enlarged edition of his Grundsiige der physiologischcn Psycho- logies likewise revised and enlarged new editions of his Ethik and Volkerpsychologie, including with all these his tireless activity as an instructor—truly an unprecedented record Wundt never repeats his works.
  • John Watson Is to Introspectionism As James Berlin Is to Expressivism (And Other Analogies You Won't Find on the Sat)

    John Watson Is to Introspectionism As James Berlin Is to Expressivism (And Other Analogies You Won't Find on the Sat)

    JOHN WATSON IS TO INTROSPECTIONISM AS JAMES BERLIN IS TO EXPRESSIVISM (AND OTHER ANALOGIES YOU WON’T FIND ON THE SAT) Maja Wilson I was in the Yale archives for the first time, reading the correspondence of early behaviorists John B. Watson and Robert M. Yerkes, and I couldn’t stop sneezing. A venerable looking scholar next to me, inspecting ancient manu- scripts with a magnifying glass, moved to the back of the room. Apparently, I was allergic to history. My very present problems had brought me to the archives: as a high school teacher, I had felt oppressed by the system of high stakes standardized testing mandated by No Child Left Behind (NCLB). The stated intent of NCLB was to promote equity, but the effects of testing seemed to be quite the opposite. Despite the modern rhetoric of equity associated with testing, I wondered if the original intent behind the creation of standardized tests foreshadowed the disastrous effects I saw playing out in schools. I knew that the first large scale standardized test in the United States—the Army Alpha Test (AAT)—had been created by eugenicists and used to promote their causes. Robert M. Yerkes, an avowed eugenicist, had helped create and administer the AAT during both World Wars. His assistant, Carl Brigham, pub- lished A Study of American Intelligence in 1923, in which he argued for “selective breeding” to preserve the integrity of the “Nordic race.” The AAT had revealed, according to Brigham, that southern and eastern Europeans had scored lowest on the test. Brigham’s book fueled growing anti-immigrant sentiment in the United States, and was used by Harry Laughlin, appointed by a House committee as an “expert eugenics agent,” to propose and pass the Immigration Restriction Act of 1924, which targeted eastern and southern Europeans.
  • Free Will and Determinism: Theory and Practice in Psychology

    Free Will and Determinism: Theory and Practice in Psychology

    Please note The text in this file has been automatically extracted and may contain minor errors. For the original version please consult the paper copy held in the Swinburne Library. - FREE WILL AND DETERMINISM: THEORY AND PRACTICE IN PSYCHOLOGY Keith Maxwell Purdie B. A., B. D., Grad. Dip. App. Psych. Submitted for the degree of ~octorof Philosophy November, 1997 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ! Table of contents '1 List of tables vii List of figures viii Abstract XI Declaration xi ! Acknowledgements xii , PART ONE 1. The importance of the issue 1.1 Conceptual issue - empirical discipline 1 1.2 Initial definitions of key terms Natural and Non Natural Determinism Metaphysical and Metl~odologicalDeterminism Hard Determinism Soft Determinism Near Determinism Non-Rigid Determinism "Superordinate" Determinism Freedom as a "Necessary Fiction" Freedom as an Assumption Active Self Determination Indeterminism Libertarianism Libertarianism and Determinism Causation The Four Causes of Aristotle 1.3 The significance of fieedom. Freedom and Determinism: Opposing views of Human Life Moral Responsibility Agency and Autonomy Novelty . Meaning Dignity Conclusion 1 -4 The position I intend to advocate Overall Position Specific Claims 2. Positions in the debate 2.1 Approaches to the issue 2.2 Criticisms of hard determinism 2.3 Limiting the scope of determinism to accommodate freedom Rene Descartes William James 2.4 Redefining freedom to accommodate determinism Soft determinism An evaluation of soft determinism 2.5 Redefining determinism to accommodate fi-eedom. Blanshard's proposal An evaluation of Blanshard's approach 2.6 Challenging the assumptions underlying the debate Reasons as causes Non-linear time Dialectical thinking 2.7 Conclusions 3.