Norman Duffy
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
CHAPTER XIX the Capture of Hiio11t St. Quentin and Psronne Is Held By
CHAPTER XIX THE HINDENBURG OUTPOST-LINE THEcapture of hiIo11t St. Quentin and PSronne is held by many Australian soldiers to be the most brilliant achievement of the A.1.F.l Among the operations planned by Monash it stands out as one of movement rather than a set piece; indeed within Australian experience of the Western Front it was the only important fight in which quick, free manoeuvre played a decisive part. It furnishes a complete answer to the comment that Monash was merely a composer of set pieces. But Monash himself realised that it was also largely a soldiers’ battle. Monash passed four brigades under the enemy’s nose round the bend of the Somme, with all his invariable care in plan- ning, supplying and bridging. But what an instrument was to his hand! The picture given in the histories of some German regiments of their slender, exhausted remnants being over- . whelmed by masses of fresh troops is sheer propaganda. The 2nd and 3rd Divisions at least, with companies depleted to the German level, weary with-in soiiie cases-incredibly pro- tracted effort, and without normal artillery support, constantly attacked more than their number of Germans in strong, well wired positions and captured more prisoners than they could safely hold. The tactics were necessarily left largely to divisional, brigade, battalion and even platoon commanaers , they were sometimes brilliant and sometimes faulty, but in general the dash, intelligence, and persistence of the troops dealt a stunning blow to five German divisions, drove the enemy from one of his key positions in France, and took 1 Gen. -
Frustrated Belligerence the Unhappy History of the 5Th Canadian Division in the First World War
Canadian Military History Volume 22 Issue 2 Article 4 2013 Frustrated Belligerence The Unhappy History of the 5th Canadian Division in the First World War William Stewart Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.wlu.ca/cmh Part of the Military History Commons Recommended Citation William Stewart "Frustrated Belligerence The Unhappy History of the 5th Canadian Division in the First World War." Canadian Military History 22, 2 (2013) This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholars Commons @ Laurier. It has been accepted for inclusion in Canadian Military History by an authorized editor of Scholars Commons @ Laurier. For more information, please contact [email protected]. : Frustrated Belligerence The Unhappy History of the 5th Canadian Division in the First World War Frustrated Belligerence The Unhappy History of the 5th Canadian Division in the First World War William Stewart It [5th Division] embodied the patriotism, the hopes, the ambitions and the concentrated effort of more than eighteen thousand Canadian citizens in the full vigor of their physical and intellectual manhood … yet it was destroyed and broken in an official letter covering one typewritten sheet. “Canada’s Fifth Division: A History”1 The Fifth Division was one of the liabilities the Union Government took over. It was a mistake from the start. Toronto Star, March 19182 uring the First World War, the factors listed above. The paper 5th Canadian Division fought Abstract: The 5th Division’s inception, examines the circumstances of the D career, and eventual fate in the no battles, won no honours, and division’s formation, the selection of First World War were powerfully earned no glory. -
OPERATIONS on NEW BRITAIN on the Island of New Britain in August
CHAPTER 1 0 OPERATIONS ON NEW BRITAIN N the island of New Britain in August 1944 there existed the sam e O kind of tacit truce as on Bougainville and the New Guinea mainland . In each area American garrisons guarded their air bases, the main Japanes e forces had been withdrawn to areas remote from the American ones, and , in the intervening no-man's land, Allied patrols, mostly of Australian-le d natives, waged a sporadic guerilla war against Japanese outposts an d patrols . In August 1944 one American regimental combat team was statione d in the Talasea-Cape Hoskins area on the north coast, one battalion group at Arawe on the south, and the remainder of the 40th Division, from whic h these groups were drawn, round Cape Gloucester at the western extremity . The main body of the Japanese army of New Britain—then believed t o be about 38,000 strong (actually about 93,000)—was concentrated i n the Gazelle Peninsula, but there were coastwatching stations farther west . In the middle area—about one-third of the island—field parties directe d by the Allied Intelligence Bureau were moving about, collecting informa- tion, helping the natives and winning their support, and harassing the enem y either by direct attack or by calling down air strikes . New Britain is some 320 miles in length and generally about 50 mile s in width, with a mountain spine rising steeply to 8,000 feet . On the south the coastal strip is generally narrow, but suitable landing places are fairl y frequent. -
Copyright and Use of This Thesis This Thesis Must Be Used in Accordance with the Provisions of the Copyright Act 1968
COPYRIGHT AND USE OF THIS THESIS This thesis must be used in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright Act 1968. Reproduction of material protected by copyright may be an infringement of copyright and copyright owners may be entitled to take legal action against persons who infringe their copyright. Section 51 (2) of the Copyright Act permits an authorized officer of a university library or archives to provide a copy (by communication or otherwise) of an unpublished thesis kept in the library or archives, to a person who satisfies the authorized officer that he or she requires the reproduction for the purposes of research or study. The Copyright Act grants the creator of a work a number of moral rights, specifically the right of attribution, the right against false attribution and the right of integrity. You may infringe the author’s moral rights if you: - fail to acknowledge the author of this thesis if you quote sections from the work - attribute this thesis to another author - subject this thesis to derogatory treatment which may prejudice the author’s reputation For further information contact the University’s Director of Copyright Services sydney.edu.au/copyright Painting Anzac A history of Australia’s official war art scheme of the First World War Volume 2 Michael Scheib A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Art History and Film Studies Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences The University of Sydney 2015 1 Appendices ________________________________________________________________ -
4Th Army Facing on the Hindenburg Line, 6 October 1918
4th Army Facing on the Hindenburg Line 6 October 1918 IX Corps: Lieutenant General Sir W.P.Braithwaite 1st (British) Division: Major General E.P.Strickland 1st Brigade 1/Black Watch 1/Camron Highlanders 8/Royal Berkshire 1st Trench Mortar Battery 2nd Brigade 2/Royal Sussex 1/Northumberland 1/King's Royal Rifle Corps 2nd Trench Mortar Battery 3rd Brigade 1/South Wales Borderers 1/Gloucester 2/Welsh 2/Royal Munster Fusiliers 3rd Trench Mortar Battery XXV Artillery Brigade: 113th Battery 114th Battery 115th Battery D (H.) Battery XXXIX Artillery Brigade: 46th Battery 51st Battery 54th Battery 30 (H.) Battery Medium Trench Mortar Batteries: X.1 Y.1 Attached: 23rd, 26th, & 409th Engineer Field Companies 6/Welsh (Pioneers) No. 1 (Machinegun) Battalion, MGC Train: 1st Divisional Ammunition Column 1st Divisional Signals Company 1st, 2nd, & 141st Field Ambulances 2nd Mobile Veterinary Section 204th Divisional Employment Company 1st Divisional Train: 6th (British) Division: Major General T.O.Marden 16th Brigade: 1/Buffs 1/King's Shropshire Light Infantry 2/York and Lancaster Regiment 16th Trench Mortar Battery 17th Brigade: 1/West Yorkshire 1 2/Durham Light Infantry 11/Essex 17th Trench Mortar Battery 71st Brigade: 1/Leinster 2/Sherwood Foresters 9/Norfolk 71st Trench Mortar Battery II Artillery Brigade: 21st Battery 42nd Battery 53rd Battery 87th (H.) Battery XXIV Artillery Brigade: 110th Battery 111th Battery 112th Battery 43rd (H.) Battery Medium Trench Mortar Batteries: X.6 Y.6 Attached: 12th, 459th (West Riding) & 509th (London) Engineer Field -
Supplement to the London Gazette, 5 Apkil, 1919. 4525
SUPPLEMENT TO THE LONDON GAZETTE, 5 APKIL, 1919. 4525 Order de la Couronne. Lieutenant (temporary Captain) George Hed- ley Miller, 13th Brigade, Australian Field Chevalier. Artillery. Lieutenant Arthur Hatton Alder, '4th Aus- LJeuten>antr<Co'lone'l John Wesley Mitchell, tralian Light Horse, attached 22nd Corps, D.S.O., 8th Infantry Battalion, Australian Mounted Regiment. Imperial Force. Lieutenant John Murdoch Prentice, 39th Lieutenant Alfred McLaren Moore, 27th In- Battalion, Australian Imperial Force. fantry Battalion, Australian Imperial Force. Lieutenant-Colonel Leslie Miltiades Mullen, ; D.iS.O., 9th Battalion, Australian Infantry. Croix de Guerre. Major Edric Noel Mulligan, D.S.O., 2nd Aus- Lieutenant Arthur Hatton Alder, 4th Aus- tralian Tunnelling Company, Australian tralian Light Horse, attached 22nd Corps, Engineers. Mounted Regiment. Major Reginald Havill Norman, M.C., 48th Major Alan Forbes Anderson, 1st Pioneer Battalion, attached 12th Australian Infantry Battalion, Australian Imperial Force. Brigade. Captain Cyril Bartlett, 4th Australian Divi- Oaptain Sydney Edward Perkins, 49th Batta- sional Train, Australian Imperial Force. lion, Australian Imperial Force. Major Duncan Beith, 23rd Battalion, Aus- Lieutenant John Murdoch Prentice, 39th Bat- tralian Imperial Force. talion, Australian Imperial Force. Captain John William ?ell> 7tn Field Com' Lieutenant (temporary Captain) Herbert Grey pany, Australian Engineers. Raymond, 12th Brigade, Australian Field Lieutenant Henry James Brown, 56th Batta- Artillery. lion, attached 14th Australian Light Trench Captain John David Rogers, M.C., 6th In- • Mortar Battery. fantry Battalion, Australian Imperial Force. Major Donald Duncan Buchanan, 13th Aus- Lieutenant-Colonel George Cattell Somerville, tralian Light Horse Regiment. C.M.G., D.S.O., Australian General List. Colonel (temporary Brigadier-General) James Quartermaster and Captain Percy Godfrey Harold Cannan, C.B., C.M.G., llth Aus- Sparkes, 31st Infantry Battalion, Australian tralian Infantry Brigade. -
Forgotten Anzacs Here Are Brief Biographies of the Five Perth Modern Soldiers Who Were Recently Added to the Plinth on the School’S War Memorial
Our forgotten ANZACs Here are brief biographies of the five Perth Modern soldiers who were recently added to the plinth on the school’s War Memorial. Arthur Bacon PMS student 1912 Edited from Forgotten Anzac – Arthur Bacon by Neil Coy with material from the ADFA website https://www.aif.adfa.edu.au/showPerson?pid=10014 Without any doubt the saddest omission from the School’s war memorial, and one of Perth Modern School’s most tragic personal stories of the Great War, is that of Arthur Bacon. Arthur Bacon was born on 24 September 1896. His family lived in a town site called Darling Range Quarries and his father operated a bluestone granite quarry at Gooseberry Hill. The School’s war memorial is built from granite from a nearby quarry. Arthur was educated initially at Midland Junction State School and then Guildford Grammar, where he passed the Senior Certificate. He enrolled in Perth Modern School on 7 February 1912. Arthur’s academic success at Modern School enabled him to study electrical engineering at UWA, at that time a fairly new and exciting field. Arthur enlisted in the Australian Imperial Forces on 7 June 1915 and was assigned to the 16th Battalion. The Battalion had suffered 70% casualties by the end of the first week at Gallipoli and Arthur was to be one of the reinforcements. He was given less than six weeks’ training before he arrived at Gallipoli during the last phase of preparation for the August, 1915 offensive. The 16th Battalion was set the most demanding of objectives, the capture of Hill 971, which was the highest point on Sari Bair Ridge. -
Defence Industry Strategic Plan
WESTERN AUSTRALIAN DEFENCE AND DEFENCE INDUSTRIES STRATEGIC PLAN CONTENTS Premier’s Foreword 1 Minister’s Foreword 2 Vision 3 1 Executive Summary 6 2 Key Actions to Date 9 3 Key Strategies 11 3.1 Supporting a Strong and Enduring Defence Presence 11 Actions 12 3.2 Growing the State’s Defence Industry Capability and Contribution 12 Actions 13-16 3.3 Developing Strategic Infrastructure 17 Actions 18 3.4 Building Research and Innovation Partnerships 19 Actions 20 3.5 Advancing Education, Training and Skilling 22 Actions 22 3.6 Supporting Veterans and Families 23 Actions 23 4 Implementation and Measuring 25 5 Appendix A - Setting the Scene 26 5.1 WA’s Competitive Advantages 26 5.2 Defence and Sovereign Interest 28 6 Appendix B - Defence and Defence Industries in Western Australia 30 6.1 Defence Industries 30 7 Glossary 32 PREMIER’S FOREWORD Western Australia has always supported Since establishing Defence West almost a our Defence Forces and significantly year ago, we have consulted widely and contributed to our nation’s Defence listened closely. That journey reinforced requirements. We can take pride in the crucial need for collaboration with the our competitive, flexible and resilient Commonwealth Government, Defence and defence industry with its long and very an industry sector that extends well beyond successful history. State borders. Our State has strong, advanced It also reinforced the privilege all manufacturing capabilities supported by Western Australians share in supporting tertiary institutions that are world class and the men and women of our Defence Force truly at the forefront of the next generation and their families. -
Surviving the Great War
Surviving the Great War Australian Prisoners of War on the Western Front, 1916-18 Aaron Pegram BA (Hons) A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy of The Australian National University Research School of Humanities & Arts ANU College of Arts & Social Sciences 24 July 2017 © Copyright by Aaron Pegram 2017 All Rights Reserved 1 CERTIFICATION I, Aaron Pegram, declare that this thesis, submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the award of Doctor of Philosophy, in the Research School of Humanities and Arts, ANU College of Arts & Social Sciences, Australian National University, is wholly my work unless otherwise referenced or acknowledged. The thesis has not been submitted for a qualification at any other academic institution. Aaron Pegram 24 July 2017 2 Acknowledgements ________________ This thesis would not be completed without the assistance of a good many people. First, I would like to thank my supervisors, Professor Bill Gammage at ANU, and Professor Peter Stanley of UNSW Canberra, who both gave endless advice on drafts, did their best to rid the verbosity from my writing, and were exceptionally patient while I completed this thesis part-time. I am eternally grateful to Bill, Peter and Professor Paul Pickering at ANU for their mentoring and overall efforts in making me a better historian. I would also like to recognise the assistance of Dr Roger Lee, Dr Andrew Richardson, Nick Anderson and the Australian Army History Unit for a research grant that allowed me to study the Western Front battlefields and carry out research in Germany in 2011. I have drawn on years of encouragement from my friends and colleagues in the Military History Section at the Australian War Memorial. -
1St Anzac Corps and the Battle of Pozières Ridge, 1916
1st Anzac Corps and the Battle of Pozières Ridge, 1916 Meleah Elizabeth Hampton Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Doctorate of Philosophy University of Adelaide Department of History April 2014 i Abstract The first major action of the 1st Anzac Corps on the Western Front was the Battle of Pozières Ridge, which was conducted from 23 July to 3 September 1916. During this time the three divisions of 1st Anzac Corps rotated in and out of the line twice, each time conducting one or more offensive operations against heavily-defended German positions. At its conclusion, the fighting around Pozières and Mouquet Farm had to its record a very high casualty rate for only the most modest of territorial gains. This thesis examines the series of operations conducted by 1st Anzac Corps during the six weeks of the Battle of Pozières Ridge. These operations are more representative of the Somme than the large attacks like the ill-fated first day or the night attacks of 14-15 July. On any given day during the Battle of the Somme only a small percentage of the line was engaged in fighting the enemy – almost invariably in the same kind of limited, set-piece attacks made by 1st Anzac Corps at Pozières and Mouquet Farm. The particular focus of this thesis is on the agency of mid to low levels of command in the military hierarchy during this battle. Detailed reports, orders and message of the battle survive in the archives in the Australian War Memorial which are in so many cases simply unavailable for other contemporary British or Dominion formations. -
2021 DEFENSE of JAPAN Defense White Paper DIGEST
2021 DEFENSE OF Pamphlet JAPAN On the Publication of Defense of Japan 2021 Minister of Defense KISHI Nobuo In the year 2020, not only did the entire world face unprecedented difficulties due to COVID-19, but various security challenges and destabilizing factors became more tangible and acute, and the international order based on universal values, which has underpinned the peace and prosperity of the international community, has been greatly tested. Looking at the situation around Japan, China has continued its unilateral attempts to change the status quo in the East and South China Seas. China Coast Guard (CCG) vessels are sighted almost daily in the contiguous zone surrounding the Senkaku Islands, an inherent part of the territory of Japan, and repeatedly intrude into Japan’s territorial waters. Furthermore, there have also been incidents of CCG vessels approaching Japanese fishing boats while intruding into Japanese territorial waters, further making the situation serious. Against this backdrop, China entered into force the China Coast Guard Law in February 2021. The CCG Law includes problematic provisions in terms of their inconsistency with international law. Sources of inconsistency include, among others, ambiguity as to geographical areas the CCG Law applies and how the rules governing the use of weapons are implemented. The CCG Law must not be allowed to infringe on the legitimate interests of the relevant countries including Japan. Furthermore, the raising of tensions in the East China Sea and other sea areas is completely unacceptable. In addition, North Korea is proceeding with ballistic missile development at an extremely rapid pace. It launched ballistic missiles of a new type in 2021, and such military trends, including nuclear and missile development, pose grave and imminent threats to Japan’s security. -
Security and Defence 2017
Security and Defence in WA: An Economic Perspective (VERSION 7.8 – FINAL DRAFT) OCTOBER 2017 Security and 2017 NOVEMBER Defence in Western Australia: An Economic Perspective Acknowledgements: Regional Development Australia and Risk Intelligence Solutions would like to thank all those stakeholders including the Australian Government, the Western Australian Government, Economic Development Australia and all the Local Governments in the Perth and Peel region as well as the regional development organisations and individuals who have contributed to this important study along with the members of the international Expert Panel Kenny McDonald and Niel McInroy. In addition, Regional Development Australia and Risk Intelligence Solutions wishes to acknowledge the kind and considerate advice and support rendered by the following individuals, who in various capacities assisted in shaping the outcome of this study. They include Professor Peter Leahy AC, Dr Stephanie Koorey, Stephen Bunce, Simon Louie, Jose Sousa Santos, Greg Salotti, Commodore Brett Dowsing, Pat Hall, Brett Biddington, Derek Parkes, James McMahon, Peter Horobin, Jonathan Smith, Peter Lockwood, Professor Stephen Smith, David Johnston, Peter Kershaw, Denton Bocking, David Trench, Stephen Cain, Dr Andrew Davies, Mark Potter, Peter Iancov, Davyd Thomas, Mike Deeks, Dale Whelan, Stuart Purves, Jeff Murray, David Thompson and Michael Page. Whilst all care and diligence have been exercised in the preparation of this report, Risk Intelligence Solutions does not warrant the accuracy of the information contained within and accepts no liability for any loss or damage that may be suffered as a result of reliance on this information, whether or not there has been any error, omission or negligence on the part of Risk Intelligence Solutions or their employees.