DOCSLIB.ORG

South Caldecotte Development Framework AMENDED DD 120319 Low Res.Indd

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

ANNEX B Urban Design & Landscape Architecture South Caldecotte Development Framework Supplementary Planning Document REVISED CONSULTATION DRAFT www.milton-keynes.gov.uk/udla February 2019 South Caldecotte Development Framework SPD This document has been prepared by Milton Keynes Council’s Urban Design and Landscape Architecture Team. For further information please contact: David Blandamer Urban Design and Landscape Architecture Placemaking Milton Keynes Council Civic Offices 1 Saxon Gate East Milton Keynes MK9 3EJ T +44 (0) 1908 254836 F +44 (0) 1908 252329 E [email protected] 2 Urban Design & Landscape Architecture Contents SECTION 1 SECTION 3 INTRODUCTION DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK 1.1 Introduction 7 3.1 Introduction 35 1.2 Role of the Development Framework 7 3.2 The Vision 35 1.3 Status of Development Framework 7 3.3 Land Uses 36 1.4 Planning Policy Background 73.4 Landscape and Open Space Strategy 36 1.5 Planning Summary 103.5 Movement Framework 38 3.6 Design 41 SECTION 2 3.7 Sustainability 44 3.8 Indicative Development Framework Plan 46 THE SITE AND ITS CONTEXT 2.1 Introduction 13 SECTION 4 2.2 South Caldecotte 13 DELIVERY 2.3 Surrounding Area and Edge Conditions 14 2.4 Topography, Views and Drainage 18 4.1 Infrastructure Delivery 49 2.5 Landscape Character 20 2.6 Habitat and Vegetation 22 4.2 Management and Maintenance 49 2.7 Access and Movement 244.3 Outline Application 49 2.8 Heritage 284.4 Design and Access Statements 49 2.9 Utilities 30 2.10 Opportunities and Constraints 32 www.milton-keynes.gov.uk/udla 3 South Caldecotte Development Framework SPD FIGURES 1.1 Boundary of the Development Framework Area 8 1.2 Oxford to Cambridge Expressway Corridor 1.3 Alignment of Potential Railway Bridge Crossing at Bow Brickhill Level Crossing 2.1 Surrounding Area 15 2.2 Edge Conditions 17 2.3 Topography, Views & Drainage 19 2.4 Landscape Character 21 2.5 Natural Environment 23 2.86 Heritage 29 2.67 Public Transport 25 2.78 Movement Network 27 2.9 Utilities 31 2.10 Opportunities and Constraints 33 3.1 Open Space and Landscape Strategy 3.12 Movement Network 39 3.23 Spine Street Cross-section 40 3.34 Character Areas 42 3.45 Development Framework Plan 47 4 Urban Design & Landscape Architecture www.milton-keynes.gov.uk/udla 5 South Caldecotte Development Framework SPD SECTION 1: INTRODUCTION 1.1 Introduction 1.2 Oxford to Cambridge Arc 1.3 Role of Development Framework 1.3 Status of Development Framework 1.4 Oxford to Cambridge Arc 1.5 Oxford to Cambridge Expressway 1.6 East- West Rail 1.47 Planning Policy Background 1.58 Planning Summary 6 Urban Design & Landscape Architecture 1.1 Introduction stakeholder expectations for the site, and respect the requirements of MKC planning 1.1.1 The site extends to approximately 56.8 ha (140 policy. acres) and is located within Bow Brickhill parish. The site is strategically located next to the A5 1.2.23 It is a requirement of policy SD12 in the Trunk Road (see fi gure 1.1) which connects to Submission Version of Plan:MK that junction 11a of the M1 via the recently opened Development Frameworks are prepared for link road. strategic development sites prior to planning permission being granted. 1.1.2 The site is allocated for employment development in the Submission Version of a 1.3 Status of Development Framework Strategic Employment Allocation Plan:MK 2016- 2031. 1.3.1 The Development Framework will be adopted as a Supplementary Planning Document (SPD) 1.1.3 Milton Keynes is in the Oxford-Cambridge Arc. to once Plan:MK has been adopted. In the East-west rail proposals and growing up to interim it will be used to guide discussions with 500,000 people means this development can developers of the site, and to demonstrate capitalise on these opportunities and provide the site’s deliverability. The Development jobs for the projected population growth. Framework accords with the National Planning Policy Framework, and Plan:MK and the Core 1.2 Role of the Development Framework Strategy. 1.2.1 Formal consultation on the draft Development 1.3.2 It is being prepared according to the Town and th Framework took place between the 5 March Country Planning (Local Planning) (England) th and the 27 April 2018. As a result of comments Regulations 2012. These regulations require received, changes have been made to the that the SPD is subject to public consultation. draft Development Framework. A further 6 week period of consultation will be undertaken 1.4 Oxford to Cambridge Arc on a revised draft before the Development Framework is adopted as a Supplementary 1.4.1 In March 2016, the National Infrastructure Planning Document (SPD). Commission (NIC) was asked to provide Government with proposals and options to 1.2.12 The purpose of this document is to provide maximise the potential of the Cambridge- planning and design guidance for the Milton Keynes-Oxford arc as a connected, development of this site. This will aid the knowledge-intensive cluster that competes on a development process, by allowing developers global stage, protecting the area’s high quality to submit informed proposals that respond environment, and securing the homes and jobs to Council (MKC), landowner and other local that the area needs. www.milton-keynes.gov.uk/udla 7 South Caldecotte Development Framework SPD Figure 1.1: Site Location 8 Urban Design & Landscape Architecture 1.4.2 The Commission’s fi nal report “Partnering for 1.6.1 The east-west rail project will re-establish a rail Prosperity: a new deal for the Cambridge - link between Cambridge and Oxford to improve Milton Keynes - Oxford Arc” was published in connections between East Anglia and central, November 2017. The central fi nding of the southern and western England. report was that rates of house building will need to double - delivering up to one million 1.6.2 The existing Marston Vale Line from Bletchley new homes by 2050 - if the arc is to achieve its to Bedford which runs to the north of the economic potential. site is part of the western section of the East West Rail route. Phase 2 of the Western 1.4.3 National investment in the East West Rail Section will upgrade and reconstruct existing project and the proposed Oxford-Cambridge and mothballed sections of the line that link Expressway is central to achieving the Bedford with Bicester, and Milton Keynes with report’s vision. These schemes will enhance Aylesbury. Public consultation was undertaken connectivity across the arc, as well as improving in September-October 2015, June-August 2017 connections with international gateways such and January-February 2018. as Heathrow. But crucially, these schemes can 1.6.3 Following public consultations, a Transport play a key role in tackling the arc’s housing and Works Act Order (TWAO) application was crisis, unlocking major new development submitted to the Secretary of State for Transport locations and enabling transformational growth on 27 July 2018. The TWAO does not involve around existing towns and cities. any works that will aff ect the site. 1.5 Oxford to Cambridge Expressway 1.6.4 Depending on funding and progress of the TWAO, construction of the line between 1.5.1 The preferred corridor for the Expressway, was Bicester and Bletchley will start at the end of announced by Highways England, in September 2019 with trains operating from 2023. 2018 (see fi gure 1.2). A preferred route will be announced in Autumn 2020, following 1.6.5 Currently there is one passenger train per hour consultation on shortlisted routes in 2019. each way between Bedford and Bletchley on weekdays and Saturdays, and then the level 1.5.2 The likelihood of the expressway passing crossing gates at Bow Brickhill are closed for through the site is considered low as this would a total of 14-15 minutes per hour, more if a aff ect the consented Eaton Leys residential freight train (not at peak times) also uses the scheme and the scheduled monument of line. As a result, there are notable queues of Magiovinium that lie immediately adjacent traffi c on Brickhill Street on both sides of the south-west of the site. level crossing when the gates are closed, and also along Station Road into Bow Brickhill, 1.6 East West Rail particularly during the morning and afternoon/ www.milton-keynes.gov.uk/udla 9 South Caldecotte Development Framework SPD Figure 1.2 Oxford to Cambridge Expressway Corridor Source:Highways England 10 Urban Design & Landscape Architecture Sp Sp R: 78.75 R: 77.82 F: 77.67 Figure 1.3 Alignment of Potential Railway Bridge Crossing at Bow Brickhill Level Crossing. Source: Milton Keynes Council www.milton-keynes.gov.uk/udla 11 South Caldecotte Development Framework SPD evening rush hours. The number of passenger • Requiring good design Achieving well-designed trains on the railway line is due to double in places 2024 when the upgrade is complete. • Conserving and enhancing the natural environment 1.6.6 Stakeholder engagement on the Development • Conserving and enhancing the historic Framework has identifi ed traffi c delays at the environment level crossing as an important issue of concern to local people. 1.47.3 The NPPF states that Supplementary Planning Documents (SPDs) “add further detail to 1.6.7 A long term solution to these delays is the the policies in the development plan Local provision of a bridge over the railway line in Plan.” and “are capable of being a material place of the level crossing at Bow Brickhill.
Recommended publications
  • Consultation Technical Report

    Consultation Technical Report

    Making Meaningful Connections Consultation Technical Report East West Rail Consultation: 31 March – 9 June 2021 This document contains the full Consultation Technical Report, without the Appendices. To access the Appendices, please visit www.eastwestrail.co.uk 01. Introduction 18 - 26 07. Project Section B: Bletchley and the Marston Vale Line 100 - 229 1.1. Chapter Summary 18 7.1. Chapter Summary 101 1.2. East West Rail 19 7.2. Introduction 104 1.3. The Project 19 7.3. Service Concepts 109 1.4. Consultation 23 7.4. Bletchley Station 141 1.5. Technical Report 26 7.5. Fenny Stratford Additional Track 144 02. The Case for East West Rail 27 - 31 7.6. Level Crossings on the Marston Vale Line 146 2.1. Chapter Summary 27 7.7. Marston Vale Line Infrastructure Upgrade 228 2.2. The overall case for East West Rail 28 08. Project Section C: Bedford 230 - 299 2.3. Benefits of railways over road improvements 31 8.1. Chapter Summary 230 03. Project Objectives 32 - 42 8.2. Introduction 234 3.1. Chapter Summary 32 8.3. Bedford St Johns 238 3.2. Introduction 33 8.4. Bedford Station 250 3.3. Safety 34 8.5. North Bedford 268 3.4. Environment 34 8.6. Conclusion 297 3.5. EWR Services 34 09. Project Section D: Clapham Green to The Eversdens 300 - 371 3.6. Connectivity 36 9.1. Chapter Summary 301 3.7. Customer Experience and Stations 37 9.2. Introduction 303 3.8. Powering EWR Services 38 9.3. Option Development 306 3.9.
  • Public-Private Partnerships Financed by the European Investment Bank from 1990 to 2020

    Public-Private Partnerships Financed by the European Investment Bank from 1990 to 2020

    EUROPEAN PPP EXPERTISE CENTRE Public-private partnerships financed by the European Investment Bank from 1990 to 2020 March 2021 Public-private partnerships financed by the European Investment Bank from 1990 to 2020 March 2021 Terms of Use of this Publication The European PPP Expertise Centre (EPEC) is part of the Advisory Services of the European Investment Bank (EIB). It is an initiative that also involves the European Commission, Member States of the EU, Candidate States and certain other States. For more information about EPEC and its membership, please visit www.eib.org/epec. The findings, analyses, interpretations and conclusions contained in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the EIB or any other EPEC member. No EPEC member, including the EIB, accepts any responsibility for the accuracy of the information contained in this publication or any liability for any consequences arising from its use. Reliance on the information provided in this publication is therefore at the sole risk of the user. EPEC authorises the users of this publication to access, download, display, reproduce and print its content subject to the following conditions: (i) when using the content of this document, users should attribute the source of the material and (ii) under no circumstances should there be commercial exploitation of this document or its content. Purpose and Methodology This report is part of EPEC’s work on monitoring developments in the public-private partnership (PPP) market. It is intended to provide an overview of the role played by the EIB in financing PPP projects inside and outside of Europe since 1990.
  • Members and Parish/Neighbourhood Councils RAIL UPDATE

    Members and Parish/Neighbourhood Councils RAIL UPDATE

    ITEM 1 TRANSPORT COMMITTEE NEWS 07 MARCH 2000 This report may be of interest to: All Members and Parish/Neighbourhood Councils RAIL UPDATE Accountable Officer: John Inman Author: Stephen Mortimer 1. Purpose 1.1 To advise the Committee of developments relating to Milton Keynes’ rail services. 2. Summary 2.1 West Coast Main Line Modernisation and Upgrade is now in the active planning stage. It will result in faster and more frequent train services between Milton Keynes Central and London, and between Milton Keynes Central and points north. Bletchley and Wolverton will also have improved services to London. 2.2 Funding for East-West Rail is now being sought from the Shadow Strategic Rail Authority (SSRA) for the western end of the line (Oxford-Bedford). Though the SSRA have permitted a bid only for a 60 m.p.h. single-track railway, excluding the Aylesbury branch and upgrade of the Marston Vale (Bedford-Bletchley) line, other Railtrack investment and possible developer contributions (yet to be investigated) may allow these elements to be included, as well as perhaps a 90 m.p.h. double- track railway. As this part of East-West Rail already exists, no form of planning permission is required; however, Transport and Works Act procedures are to be started to build the missing parts of the eastern end of the line. 2.3 New trains were introduced on the Marston Vale line, Autumn 1999. A study of the passenger accessibility of Marston Vale stations identified various desirable improvements, for which a contribution of £10,000 is required from this Council.
  • Archaeological Desk Based Assessment

    Archaeological Desk Based Assessment

    Archaeological Desk Based Assessment __________ Brockley Hill, Stanmore - New Banqueting Facility, Brockley Hill, London Borough of Harrow Brockley Hill DBA Update | 1 June 2020 | Project Ref 6129A Project Number: 06129A File Origin: P:\HC\Projects\Projects 6001-6500\6101 - 6200\06129 - Former Stanmore and Edgware Golf Club, Brockley Hill\AC\Reports\2020.08.25 - Brockley Hill DBAv3.docx Author with date Reviewer code, with date AJ, 25.02.2020 RD-0023, 25.02.2020 JM-0057,13.08.202019 JM, 25.08.2020 HGH Consulting, 15.08.2020 Brockley Hill DBA Update | 2 Contents Non-Technical Summary 1. Introduction ........................................................................................ 6 2. Methodology ...................................................................................... 13 3. Relevant Policy Framework ............................................................... 16 4. Archaeological Background ............................................................... 21 5. Proposed Development, Assessment of Significance and Potential Effects ............................................................................................... 37 6. Conclusions ....................................................................................... 41 7. Sources Consulted ............................................................................. 43 8. Figures .............................................................................................. 46 Appendices Appendix 1: Greater London Historic Environment Record Data Figures
  • Draft Local Implementation Plan 3

    Draft Local Implementation Plan 3

    Brent’s Third Local Implementation Plan 2019-2041 March 2019 Foreword iii Executive summary iv 1. Introduction and preparing a LIP 1 Introduction 1 Local approval process 1 Statutory consultation Error! Bookmark not defined. Statutory duties 3 LIP approval 3 2. Borough Transport Objectives 4 Introduction 4 Local context 4 Changing the transport mix 16 Mayor’s Transport Strategy outcomes 22 Outcome 1: London’s streets will be healthy and more Londoners will travel actively 22 Outcome 2: London’s streets will be safe and secure 28 Outcome 3: London’s streets will be used more efficiently and have less traffic on them 36 Outcome 4: London’s streets will be clean and green 39 Outcome 5: The public transport network will meet the needs of a growing London 46 Outcome 6: Public transport will be safe, affordable and accessible to all 50 Outcome 7: Journeys by public transport will be pleasant, fast and reliable 54 Outcome 8: Active, efficient and sustainable travel will be the best option in new developments 56 Outcome 9: Transport investment will unlock the delivery of new homes and jobs’ 60 Other Mayoral Strategies 63 3. The Delivery Plan 64 i Introduction 64 Linkages to the Mayor’s Transport Strategy priorities 64 TfL Business Plan 68 Sources of funding 72 Long-Term interventions to 2041 74 Three-year indicative Programme of Investment 78 Supporting commentary for the three-year programme 80 Risks to the delivery of the three-year programme 85 Annual programme of schemes and initiatives 94 Supporting commentary for the annual programme 94 Risk assessment for the annual programme 94 Monitoring the delivery of the outcomes of the Mayor’s Transport Strategy 104 Overarching mode-share aim and outcome Indicators 104 Delivery indicators 104 Local targets 104 ii Foreword The Mayor of London has set an ambitious vision for London.
  • The Transport System of Medieval England and Wales

    The Transport System of Medieval England and Wales

    THE TRANSPORT SYSTEM OF MEDIEVAL ENGLAND AND WALES - A GEOGRAPHICAL SYNTHESIS by James Frederick Edwards M.Sc., Dip.Eng.,C.Eng.,M.I.Mech.E., LRCATS A Thesis presented for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Salford Department of Geography 1987 1. CONTENTS Page, List of Tables iv List of Figures A Note on References Acknowledgements ix Abstract xi PART ONE INTRODUCTION 1 Chapter One: Setting Out 2 Chapter Two: Previous Research 11 PART TWO THE MEDIEVAL ROAD NETWORK 28 Introduction 29 Chapter Three: Cartographic Evidence 31 Chapter Four: The Evidence of Royal Itineraries 47 Chapter Five: Premonstratensian Itineraries from 62 Titchfield Abbey Chapter Six: The Significance of the Titchfield 74 Abbey Itineraries Chapter Seven: Some Further Evidence 89 Chapter Eight: The Basic Medieval Road Network 99 Conclusions 11? Page PART THREE THr NAVIGABLE MEDIEVAL WATERWAYS 115 Introduction 116 Chapter Hine: The Rivers of Horth-Fastern England 122 Chapter Ten: The Rivers of Yorkshire 142 Chapter Eleven: The Trent and the other Rivers of 180 Central Eastern England Chapter Twelve: The Rivers of the Fens 212 Chapter Thirteen: The Rivers of the Coast of East Anglia 238 Chapter Fourteen: The River Thames and Its Tributaries 265 Chapter Fifteen: The Rivers of the South Coast of England 298 Chapter Sixteen: The Rivers of South-Western England 315 Chapter Seventeen: The River Severn and Its Tributaries 330 Chapter Eighteen: The Rivers of Wales 348 Chapter Nineteen: The Rivers of North-Western England 362 Chapter Twenty: The Navigable Rivers of
  • Roman Roads of Britain

    Roman Roads of Britain

    Roman Roads of Britain A Wikipedia Compilation by Michael A. Linton PDF generated using the open source mwlib toolkit. See http://code.pediapress.com/ for more information. PDF generated at: Thu, 04 Jul 2013 02:32:02 UTC Contents Articles Roman roads in Britain 1 Ackling Dyke 9 Akeman Street 10 Cade's Road 11 Dere Street 13 Devil's Causeway 17 Ermin Street 20 Ermine Street 21 Fen Causeway 23 Fosse Way 24 Icknield Street 27 King Street (Roman road) 33 Military Way (Hadrian's Wall) 36 Peddars Way 37 Portway 39 Pye Road 40 Stane Street (Chichester) 41 Stane Street (Colchester) 46 Stanegate 48 Watling Street 51 Via Devana 56 Wade's Causeway 57 References Article Sources and Contributors 59 Image Sources, Licenses and Contributors 61 Article Licenses License 63 Roman roads in Britain 1 Roman roads in Britain Roman roads, together with Roman aqueducts and the vast standing Roman army, constituted the three most impressive features of the Roman Empire. In Britain, as in their other provinces, the Romans constructed a comprehensive network of paved trunk roads (i.e. surfaced highways) during their nearly four centuries of occupation (43 - 410 AD). This article focuses on the ca. 2,000 mi (3,200 km) of Roman roads in Britain shown on the Ordnance Survey's Map of Roman Britain.[1] This contains the most accurate and up-to-date layout of certain and probable routes that is readily available to the general public. The pre-Roman Britons used mostly unpaved trackways for their communications, including very ancient ones running along elevated ridges of hills, such as the South Downs Way, now a public long-distance footpath.
  • Flooding Survey June 1990 River Tame Catchment

    Flooding Survey June 1990 River Tame Catchment

    Flooding Survey June 1990 River Tame Catchment NRA National Rivers Authority Severn-Trent Region A RIVER CATCHMENT AREAS En v ir o n m e n t Ag e n c y NATIONAL LIBRARY & INFORMATION SERVICE HEAD OFFICE Rio House, Waterside Drive, Aztec West, Almondsbury. Bristol BS32 4UD W EISH NRA Cardiff Bristol Severn-Trent Region Boundary Catchment Boundaries Adjacent NRA Regions 1. Upper Severn 2. Lower Severn 3. Avon 4. Soar 5. Lower Trent 6. Derwent 7. Upper Trent 8. Tame - National Rivers Authority Severn-Trent Region* FLOODING SURVEY JUNE 1990 SECTION 136(1) WATER ACT 1989 (Supersedes Section 2 4 (5 ) W a te r A c t 1973 Land Drainage Survey dated January 1986) RIVER TAME CATCHMENT AND WEST MIDLANDS Environment Agency FLOOD DEFENCE DEPARTMENT Information Centre NATONAL RIVERS AUTHORrTY SEVERN-TRENT REGION Head Office SAPPHIRE EAST Class N o 550 STREETSBROOK ROAD SOLIHULL cession No W MIDLANDS B91 1QT ENVIRONMENT AGENCY 0 9 9 8 0 6 CONTENTS Contents List of Tables List of Associated Reports List of Appendices References G1ossary of Terms Preface CHAPTER 1 SUMMARY 1.1 Introducti on 1.2 Coding System 1.3 Priority Categories 1.4 Summary of Problem Evaluations 1.5 Summary by Priority Category 1.6 Identification of Problems and their Evaluation CHAPTER 2 THE SURVEY Z.l Introduction 2.2 Purposes of Survey 2.3 Extent of Survey 2.4 Procedure 2.5 Hydrological Criteria 2.6 Hydraulic Criteria 2.7 Land Potential Category 2.8 Improvement Costs 2.9 Benefit Assessment 2.10 Test Discount Rate 2.11 Benefit/Cost Ratios 2.12 Priority Category 2.13 Inflation Factors
  • Agenda-Item-10-East-West-Rail

    Agenda-Item-10-East-West-Rail

    Agenda Item 10 CAMBOURNE TOWN COUNCIL District of South Cambridgeshire East West Rail Council Meeting 8th June 2021 10.1 East West Rail’s Consultation Further to the resolution delegating it to the Chairs Group to formulate a response then circulate it to the Council prior to submission to East West Rail (EWR) prior to the deadline of Wednesday 9th June 2021. Below is the approved draft response to EWR. The black is EWR questions and the red is the response submitted to EWR on Monday 7th June 2021 10.2 East West Rail Email Email from David Rutherford - Varsity Railway Cambridge Travel Model Report, as submitted to EWR. Page 1 of 12 Agenda Item 10 Introduction to the project so far The approach to Cambridge 1. Please share your view on Because EWR alignments closer to north Cambridge are now being considered, we have looked again at whether we were right to have favoured Route Option E and approaching Cambridge from the south as we confirmed after our last consultation. In particular, we have reviewed our previous assessment that concluded approaching from the south was the better option taking account of a Cambourne North Station outside of Route E to see if we would have made a different decision. We consider that the advantages of approaching Cambridge from the south continue to support this conclusion and that a number of challenges remain for a northern approach even with a Cambourne North station. We’d welcome your comments on our assessment. The following questions are in the same order as they appear in the Consultation Document.
  • Local Development Plan (LDP) 2032 (LDP) 2032 - Draft Plan Strategy Plan Strategy (LDP) 2032 - Draft

    Local Development Plan (LDP) 2032 (LDP) 2032 - Draft Plan Strategy Plan Strategy (LDP) 2032 - Draft

    Derry City & Strabane District Council Local Development Plan (LDP) 2032 (LDP) 2032 - Draft Plan Strategy Plan Strategy (LDP) 2032 - Draft Derry City and Strabane District Council 98 Strand Road 47 Derry Rd Derry Strabane BT48 7NN Tyrone, BT82 8DY Tel: (028) 71 253 253 E: [email protected] Website: www.derrystrabane.com/ldp Local Development Plan Find us on Facebook derrycityandstrabanedistrictcouncil Twitter @dcsdcouncil Draft Plan Strategy Consultation Arrangements Consultation Arrangements This LDP draft Plan Strategy (dPS) is a consultation document, to which representations can be made during a formal consultation period from Monday 2nd December 2019 to Monday 27th January 2020. Representations received after this date will not be considered. This dPS document is available, together with the associated documents, at http://www. derrystrabane.com/Subsites/LDP/Local-Development-Plan These documents are also available to view, during normal opening hours, at: • Council Offices, 98 Strand Road, Derry, BT48 7NN • Council Offices, 47 Derry Road, Strabane, BT82 8DY • Public Libraries and Council Leisure Centres throughout the District. Public Meetings and Workshops will be held throughout the District during December 2019 / January 2020; see the Council’s website and local press advertisements for details. This LDP draft Plan Strategy is considered by the Council to be ‘sound’; if you have any comments or objections to make, it is necessary to demonstrate why you consider that the Plan is not ‘sound’ and / or why you consider your proposal to be ‘sound’. Comments, or representations made in writing, will be considered at an Independent Examination (IE) conducted by the Planning Appeals Commission (PAC) or other independent body that will be appointed by the Department for Infrastructure (DfI).
  • England's Economic Heartland Rail Study Phase 1 15 MB

    England's Economic Heartland Rail Study Phase 1 15 MB

    Passenger Rail Study Phase One: Baseline Assessment of the current network A technical report produced by Network Rail for the EEH evidence base Table of Figures ....................................................................................................................................................... 3 Glossary ................................................................................................................................................................... 4 Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................................. 5 An Area of National Importance ......................................................................................................................... 5 Understand the Railway’s Role ........................................................................................................................... 5 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................ 9 Aim of Phase 1 of the Passenger Rail Study ........................................................................................................ 9 What is the purpose of baselining the existing passenger network? ............................................................... 10 Methodology ....................................................................................................................................................
  • Northamptonshire Highways Newsletter 4 - March 2017

    Northamptonshire Highways Newsletter 4 - March 2017

    A45 Daventry Development Link Road Due for completion spring 2018 Northamptonshire Highways Newsletter 4 - March 2017 Simon Levell Rebecca Miller Site liaison manager Communication [email protected] manager [email protected] Welcome to the fourth edition of the Daventry Development Link Road Newsletter. The scheme The last three months, since the last Newsletter No. 3 in December 2016, has seen The A45 Daventry Development Link Road (formerly Weedon, Flore & Upper Heyford Bypass) will be steady progress on site. We had our planned two-week Christmas/New Year a new 3.5 mile (5.7 km) single carriageway. shutdown, the generally short daylight hours and often difficult weather conditions in terms of temperatures, rainfall and sometimes high winds means that certain activities – notably earthworks and concreting – can be constrained or not take place The road will start at a new roundabout on the existing A45 between the villages of Dodford and at all. Weedon. It will then pass to the north of the communities of Weedon, Flore and Upper Heyford before re-joining the A45 at a new roundabout between Upper Heyford and the M1 motorway at That said, the contractors – Balfour Beatty – and their sub-contractors have been junction 16. progressing well. We had to adjust some of the programme and implemented imaginative and pro-active efforts to keep on programme and advance a number of The scheme features extensive earthworks (cuttings and embankments) and includes the work activities. construction of eight structures as follows: The main construction works (phase 2 contract) continues as planned, and in • A major combined bridge crossing of the West Coast Main Line Railway & Grand conjunction with Northamptonshire Highways issues are being communicated to Union Canal affected parties and the local community.