Following Mozart in Europe

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Following Mozart in Europe Following Mozart in Europe E 65 62 lb 22 55 62 20 Kingston che e 45 Wismar Goleniów Chelmno Brodnica Mlawa 1 sis Cuxhaven Czaplinek upon Hull stfrie Lübeck Güstrow We recommend... Man- 22 O seln Schwerin Neubrandenburg Bydgoszcz Ciechanów 180 In Bremer- 27 Szczecin Torun chester Hamburg 22 19 Müritz- Pila 18 Doncaster Grimsby eln Wilhelmshaven haven Walcz Ins See Prenzlau Stargard Szez. W Following the tracks of Mozart through Europe! he 24 28 c Sierpc G sc ote 261 is Sheffield Lincoln si Emden 26 Parchim Neustrelitz N l Plonsk ie Inowroclaw a fr 1 r st 55 Lauenburg Wloclawek Plock Stoke Newark Skegness e 234 Ludwigs- Wagrowiec e Leeuwarden Groningen Leer 22 22 E lust Pritzwalk 251 Dobiegniew Route de France Route Royale Boston W Lüneburg l b PL 5 Derby Nottingham a Bremen 45 e 55 Löwenberg 65 NL Oldenburg Perleberg O Gorzów Gniezno 75 1 28 Uelzen Kyritz d War Sochaczew Cromer s Soltau e ta England t 29 r Wlkp. Krosniewice m W Eberswalde 37 e 24 11 Lowicz King's Heerenveen E Kostrzyn 30 Walsall Stamford Den Helder Assen s A Wrzesnia Lynn 22 232 Cloppenburg e lle H Kutno B r r Salzwedel a Berlin Skwierzyna Pniewy Kolo 69 7 v Rathenow 10 2 Skiernie- Norwich IJssel- e 24 Leicester Peter- Celle l Poznan 42 13 Great Meppel 233 Stendal 10 wice r Emmen Frankfurt/O. 30 Konin borough Yarmouth Alkmaar Spree Steszew Birmingham Nienburg 234 Brandenburg Swiebodzin 67 i meer Slubice ta Northampton Scole Lowestoft 19 Zwolle 1 Diepholz Potsdam 12 War _ Stratford- Ouse Lingen Hannover Pleszew Lódz t Haarlem al Wolfsburg Beeskow Bedford Almelo an 2 2 Krosno Odrz. 261 Gostyn Jarocin Pabianice on Avon 24 Amsterdam Mittelland - K u r g Kalisz 24 a b 5 Osnabrück Minden Peine Braun- 30 B r a n d e n Guben Zielona Góra Cambridge Ipswich 10 13 Lask 30 Hildes- schweig Lübben Leszno 1 i 19 30 Magdeburg Lucken- 15 Amersfoort Rheine 9 Gubin Od 11 MM heim N Nowa ra Ostrów Sieradz 40 Felixstowe M Den Haag M Apeldoorn Bielefeld Hameln walde M n Leiden GB M Enschede e Piotrków T M Luton M 14 Dessau i Sól Wielkopolski h Salzgitter ß ´ e Zagan _ Rawicz a Oxford 13 32 Harwich Utrecht 35 Ems Glogów Trybunalski mes Gouda Arnhem Detmold 49 Wittenberg Herzberg /E. Cottbus London Colchester Rotterdam 25 31 Münster Halber- B Kepno 75 Swindon 2 34 7 36 ó b Lubin´ Nijmegen 37 33 stadt r Wielun´ M 31 Torgau S´ 67 1 MM 30 Southend-on-Sea 30 Reading M M a 3 Hamm M M a Paderborn 17 l _ M M Gelsen- Halle Bolesawiec 25 Moerdijk s Wesel Eisleben a Windsor Tilburg Lippstadt Nordhausen E Hoyerswerda Legnica Newbury Sheerness 1 31 kirchen Wurzen lb Czestochowa France, paradise for the senses, enhanced with the dimension of Mozart‘s Chelsea Roosen- Scherfede MM e M 55 Explore the most beautiful corners in England, Belgium and the Netherlands 331 Göttingen M 4 _ s M Wroclaw 3 Vlissingen Essen M M music. Basingstoke Ramsgate daal Eindhoven 45 Leipzig49 M 40 Dobrodzien in their cultural highlights as well. 25 MM 40 M M Duisburg Dortmund 4 Kassel Meißen Görlitz M M 2 14 Brzeg M 5 M Zeebrugge Bochum Arns- Bautzen k Guildford Canterbury 34 Hagen W Mühlhausen Naumburg 51 Jelenia Góra 23 25 Venlo berg er Old Flanders Route Main German Rivers Route Winchester 15 Dover Oostende Brugge 8 Düsseldorf Wuppertal ra Dresden Antwerpen Korbach 40 Zittau Walbrzych_ Southampton Opole Mönchen- 49 Borna 65 27 Folkestone Dunkerque Gent 313 35 7 Weimar Zeitz Liberec Bytom Brighton MM 17 Remscheid Pirna Decín Worthing M M 1 Bruxelles/ gladbach Gotha Nysa Sosnowiec M Chemnitz n 40 M 7 Novy 40 M Newport M 40 r 45 Olpe Bad Ports- Hastings Calais e 17 14 Mechelen Brussel Köln 4 Eisenach 4 Erfurt Jena S Zwickau Bor Gliwice Kraków Eastbourne d Maastricht 13 Hersfeld Gera a Turnov Katowice mouth F n MM 41 a Ústí n. L. 4 l a 12 M M Kortrijk Leuven Siegen l 72 M e Boulogne M M g M 40 e Teplice Isle of 25 9 Si 40 La s.-M. Lille MM Saalfeld 441 b Racibórz A St. Omer Brühl M M Marburg D e Náchod Wight Aachen M M Anna- Mladá 75 M Tienen 40 M Bonn Plauen 15 Roubaix 411 40 Chomutov Rybnik r MM R berg y M 4 29 M Meiningen 55 Boleslav Hradec Montreuil t M M h Wetzlar Bielsko- M 19 M 53 o 26 42 42 e 3516 Gießen 49 Králové Ostrava i 21 Mons Liège in Fulda Hof 67 Biala_ s Douai 15 hn Karlovy h umperk Opava Berck-Plage a Bad Kladno M 27 Koblenz L 41 MM 11 Kolín Frankfurt Vary M M Pardubice MM M o Arras M M Neustadt Coburg M Cesky M 402 Namur Blankenheim M 77 42 M M 3 48 ra Charleroi M Valen- Marche-en- M a a 52 a E. 14 M in Cheb nk c Caslav va Tìín Zywiec ciennes Famenne 29 Salzig Bie. 22 45 51 u Praha Svitavy Abbeville Cambrai 18 a. M. Mariánské ro v Olomouc n. V. Wies- MM e MM M M B Rheinland- M Schweinfurt M le Tréport MM M M B M M M M Offenbach Lázn M M M Bonavis l baden 5 M S St.G. M M a e M La Capelle- M e ° o Wittlich MM 48 50 Havlíckuv Hranice m s M M Pte. de 17 Givet o Bayreuth Plzen Amiens M M 402 m Bastogne 61 Pribram a Zilina M e.-Th. B. M Mainz v Fécamp Dieppe e 25 M Aschaffen- Würzburg CZ Barfleur Poix St.- 9 a r 51 44 44 Pfalz 31 Bamberg Weiden lt Zlin Etretat 44 Quentin Ettelbruck L Op. burg 3 V Pelhrimov g Cherbourg 1 46 S 15 Darmstadt 45 C a 50 Charleville- a MM 50 Tábor Brno a Ruzomberok u M M Worms MM e n M M 46 M 44 Neufchâtel- r Arlon M i o W Martin M M 19 a 5 41 Erlangen M Le Havre 15 Mézères Trier Kircheim- Jihlava 1 M 50 M en-Bray M 49 M From Brussels to the Mozart sites in Flanders and the Netherlands then back bolanden Amberg Klatovy 55 75 Banská In Western Germany on Mozart’s ways along the Rhine, Main and the Mosel- 3 5 Gournay 19 Laon 26 Sedan Luxembourg Mannheim Uherské Trencín Rouen 23 MM Fürth Bystrica via Liège. le. Deauville sne 62 M M Nürnberg Písek Jindrichúv- Moravské Prievidza Bayeux i 1 M 46 Aronde M 53 M Hradit M 46 Compiègne A L Longwy 50 M Rothenburg 43 17 Rethel Schwetzingen MM Strakonice Hradec Budejovice 13 o 292 M M Heidelberg 81 Ansbach Nové 422 M S Beauvais 46 Thionville M o. d. T. Cham M St.-Lô e M 65 Lisieux Kaisers- in Creil 15 Soissons r 44 50 59 Mesto Reims 56 Great Cities in the Heart of Europe Italia Grande e 15 46 401 e r Saar- lautern Waghäusl 50 Regensburg Znojmo Zvolen Caen i Clermont- 6 6 Schwäbisch 6 Crailsheim Breclav 5 50 brücken 8 Ceské 3 N d Evreux Pontoise en-Argonne Verdun a 50 35 Hall Dinkelsbühl 45 Regen Gmünd 61 SK 77 n 5 Marne 25 50 Bruchsal Poysdorf o r m a Meaux 4 i Pirmasens Knittlingen El. Budejovice Horn 402 13 4 Wa. Ingol- 3 Deggendorf Hollabrunn Châlons- n Metz Ludwigs- 21 Straubing 461 Trnava Levice Avranches Flers MM Karlsruhe 8 Schwäbisch Argentan St.-Germain- M M burg Nö. stadt 93 49 M 2 Verneuil M en-Champagne e K. Zwettl M en-Laye M 4 Vaihingen S. Gmünd Paris 17 21 4 n C. A. Passau 54 571 Nitra G MM 92 Kloster- 50 75 r M Kalná e Stuttgart M Stein a M M Vilshofen 22 Dreux Versailles 23 Sarrebourg i n Baden- M Sées Nancy 6 Göppingen Ho. Donau- M Neuburg D 45 neuburg Wien Bar-le-Duc o MM MM n M n M M M Toul M M P. a Bratislava Sézanne Baden Baden- Landshut u M M Linz M M M wörth a.d.D. M h Geislingen Purkersdorf 48 M M M 53 Melk M M Fougères M 52 M 11 M MM 52 MM Eferding g MM Vác Mayenne Chartres 11 26 Tübingen M M Strasbourg M M 5 54 St.-Dizier M M Corbeil D. 9 M M Mauthausen M M Ybbs Nogent- 43 M M M Melun M M M Wester- 1 Esztergom M a Lunéville G. Bi. M 4 M R 56 MM 6 Alençon e MM Braunau/ St.Pölten Schwechat 6 in Joinville 21 M M e s.-S. stetten M M 20 Altötting Ebelsberg 60 o Wels M M Komarom S M Etampes p Reutlingen M 8 M Nogent- M M M M s Strengberg Laxenburg a - Ulm 8 Inn 81 Fontainebleau Neufchâteau e 531 41 552 Haag 3 Budapest i le-Rotrou 5 m l Augsburg Kemmelbach Baden 54 le 49 MM Lambach Eisen- 1 50 St.-Dié M 60 n 17 Württemberg u M s M a 21 25 a M Wasserbg. M 50 Châteaudun Troyes Villingen- n M Wiener stadt Laval Nemours Sens 35 o 7 München54 Laufen 1 Vöcklabruck Tatabánya e h 26 Schwenningen D Neustadt Gyor´´ 10 a Colmar Frabertsham Salzburg 57 A Le Mans C Chaumont 31 Épinal Meßkirch Memmingen h Sch. 47 49 Orléans 60 Vittel Freiburg c I MM Mariazell Sopron 501 s 52 M M e MM 7 B M M a M M Mürz- Montargis L M M Hieflau r 8 M MM M 65 D M 10 12 M Kaufbeuren 533 M M St.
Recommended publications
  • The History of Tourism: Structures on the Path to Modernity by Ueli Gyr
    The History of Tourism: Structures on the Path to Modernity by Ueli Gyr Various academic disciplines have repeatedly sought to re-evaluate the significance of tourism. Globalised tourism's so- cio-economic place within the framework of the leisure and holidaying opportunities on offer today has attracted particu- lar attention. Such accounts often leave out the fact that this also has a history. The present article aims to overcome this shortcoming: it seeks to present an overview of the important structures, processes, types and trends of tourism against the background of historical developments. It deals with early forms of travel in the classical world and the Mid- dle Ages, as well as the precursors of modern tourism, Bildungsreisen ("educational journeys") and the middle-class culture of travel. It then examines the boom in mass tourism in the 19th century and the unique expansion of tourism in the 1960s characterised by new forms of holidaying and experience shaped by globalisation. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Tourism as a Globalised System 2. Early Forms of Travel and Types of Journey 3. Precursors of Modern Tourism 4. The Foundations of Modern Tourism 5. The Boom in Mass Tourism in the 19th Century 6. Holidaying Practices in the Interwar Period 7. The Expansion of Tourism and Globalisation 8. Appendix 1. Bibliography 2. Notes Citation Tourism as a Globalised System Tourism is often seen as a global phenomenon with an almost incomprehensibly massive infrastructure. Its importance is evident from the fact that its influence thoroughly penetrates society, politics, culture and, above all, the economy. In- deed, this is the branch of the global economy with the most vigorous growth: the World Tourism Organisation (WTO) estimates that in 2007 it encompassed 903 million tourists who spent 625 billion US dollars.1 They thereby supported a global system with roughly 100 million employees in the modern leisure and experience industry.
    [Show full text]
  • 39 DOUZELAGE CONFERENCE SIGULDA 24 April – 27 April 2014
    AGROS (CY) ALTEA (E) ASIKKALA (FIN) th BAD KÖTZTING (D) 39 DOUZELAGE CONFERENCE BELLAGIO (I) BUNDORAN (IRL) CHOJNA (PL) GRANVILLE (F) HOLSTEBRO (DK) HOUFFALIZE (B) JUDENBURG (A) SIGULDA KÖSZEG (H) MARSASKALA (MT) MEERSSEN (NL) NIEDERANVEN (L) OXELÖSUND (S) th th PREVEZA (GR) 24 April – 27 April 2014 PRIENAI (LT) SESIMBRA (P) SHERBORNE (GB) SIGULDA (LV) SIRET (RO) SKOFIA LOKA (SI) MINUTES SUŠICE (CZ) TRYAVNA (BG) TÜRI (EST) ZVOLEN (SK) DOUZELAGE – EUROPEAN TOWN TWINNING ASSOCIATION PARTICIPANTS AGROS Andreas Latzias Metaxoula Kamana Alexis Koutsoventis Nicolas Christofi ASIKKALA Merja Palokangos-Viitanen Pirjo Ala-Hemmila Salomaa Miika BAD KOTZTING Wolfgang Kershcer Agathe Kerscher Isolde Emberger Elisabeth Anthofer Saskia Muller-Wessling Simona Gogeissl BELLAGIO Donatella Gandola Arianna Sancassani CHOJNA Janusz Cezary Salamończyk Norbert Oleskow Rafał Czubik Andrzej Będzak Anna Rydzewska Paweł Woźnicki BUNDORAN Denise Connolly Shane Smyth John Campbell GRANVILLE Fay Guerry Jean-Claude Guerry HOLSTEBRO Jette Hingebjerg Mette Grith Sorensen Lene Bisgaard Larsen Victoria Louise Tilsted Joachim Peter Tilsted 2 DOUZELAGE – EUROPEAN TOWN TWINNING ASSOCIATION HOUFFALIZE Alphonse Henrard Luc Nollomont Mathilde Close JUDENBURG Christian Fuller Franz Bachmann Andrea Kober Theresa Hofer Corinna Haasmann Marios Agathocleous KOSZEG Peter Rege Kitti Mercz Luca Nagy Aliz Pongracz MARSASKALA Mario Calleja Sandro Gatt Charlot Mifsud MEERSSEN Karel Majoor Annigje Luns-Kruytbosch Ellen Schiffeleers Simone Borm Bert Van Doorn Irene Raedts NIEDERANVEN Jos
    [Show full text]
  • Leopold and Wolfgang Mozart's View of the World
    Between Aufklärung and Sturm und Drang: Leopold and Wolfgang Mozart’s View of the World by Thomas McPharlin Ford B. Arts (Hons.) A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy European Studies – School of Humanities and Social Sciences University of Adelaide July 2010 i Between Aufklärung and Sturm und Drang: Leopold and Wolfgang Mozart’s View of the World. Preface vii Introduction 1 Chapter 1: Leopold Mozart, 1719–1756: The Making of an Enlightened Father 10 1.1: Leopold’s education. 11 1.2: Leopold’s model of education. 17 1.3: Leopold, Gellert, Gottsched and Günther. 24 1.4: Leopold and his Versuch. 32 Chapter 2: The Mozarts’ Taste: Leopold’s and Wolfgang’s aesthetic perception of their world. 39 2.1: Leopold’s and Wolfgang’s general aesthetic outlook. 40 2.2: Leopold and the aesthetics in his Versuch. 49 2.3: Leopold’s and Wolfgang’s musical aesthetics. 53 2.4: Leopold’s and Wolfgang’s opera aesthetics. 56 Chapter 3: Leopold and Wolfgang, 1756–1778: The education of a Wunderkind. 64 3.1: The Grand Tour. 65 3.2: Tour of Vienna. 82 3.3: Tour of Italy. 89 3.4: Leopold and Wolfgang on Wieland. 96 Chapter 4: Leopold and Wolfgang, 1778–1781: Sturm und Drang and the demise of the Mozarts’ relationship. 106 4.1: Wolfgang’s Paris journey without Leopold. 110 4.2: Maria Anna Mozart’s death. 122 4.3: Wolfgang’s relations with the Weber family. 129 4.4: Wolfgang’s break with Salzburg patronage.
    [Show full text]
  • The Fishing Rules
    Slovak Angling Association – The Board A.Kmeťa 20, 010 55 Žilina THE FISHING RULES For holders of fishing licenses for carp waters on the fishing grounds of the Slovak Angling Association valid from the 1st January 2015. Slovak Angling Association –the Board issues this fishing license for carp waters of the Slovak Angling Association to execute fishery law in the fishing grounds of the Slovak Angling Association in accordance with the law no. 139/2002 Coll. regarding fishery as later amended (hereinafter referred to „law”) and the Executing Decree no. 185/2006 Coll. (hereinafter „Decree“). General principles for holders of the association fishing licenses a) These Fishing Rules regulate means and conditions of the execution of the fishery acts in the fishing grounds of the Slovak Angling Association stated in the separate part of these Fishing Rules (lists and fishing grounds description, earlier-carp catching exemption since the 15th May 2015-2015, Minimal legal capture size regulations) b) Holders of this fishing license can catch in the fishing grounds stated in the list. This fishing license is valid for carp waters of the members´ organization. c) The anglers are required to keep the law, Decree and these Fishing Rules. d) In all carp waters with fishing allowed year-long, the observance of the breeding season (individual fish protection) is required in §10 under the Decree. e) The anglers are required to keep a fishing ticket, a fishing license and a member´s license with the photo issued by the member´s organization of the Slovak Angling Association. f) Selected clauses of the Decree are stated on the page 3-5.
    [Show full text]
  • Sherborne Douzelage 8.09(A5) Print.Pub
    SHERBORNE DOUZELAGE NEWSLETTER AUGUST 2009 ALTEA 35TH CONFERENCE with Janet Parsons I began writing this article in the The formal proceedings began with a vibrant and bustling city of Valen- lecture on Town Planning, an inter- cia a few days after the Altea Gen- esting presentation which suggested eral Meeting, my mind still a ca- that towns and cities have lost the cophony of images and impressions link with nature and proposing that of so much we all shared in the safe spaces are needed where people splendid surroundings of the Palau feel at ease. Altea Centre d’Arts. Here are some of them. It set the tone for the meeting, one with a distinctively Mediterranean Altea, an attractive and delightful flavour, led by the warm and engag- small white town, not unlike the ing style of our President, Ed Weber. ‘pueblos blancos’ of Andalucia, sits between mountains and orange Cont. page 2 groves of the Sierra Bernia and the Mediterranean. Our scenic conference hall Our hotel gave us plenty of scope for informal gatherings and relaxa- tion under the palm trees, where we exchanged views and ideas with delegates and new friends from the 21 towns who travelled to the 34th Douzelage General Meeting. Words limit the visual impact of the Conference Centre where the for- mal meetings were held – we de- scended a flight of stairs into an auditorium bathed in sunlight and enclosed on three sides by glass, with a stunning backdrop of moun- tains. If inspiration was lacking the setting certainly provided it. PAGE 2 SHERBORNE DOUZELAGE AUGUST 2009 ALTEA 35TH CONFERENCE with Janet Parsons Centre d’Arts was transformed We welcomed a delegation from into a style and ambience resem- Marsascala in Malta to their bling the Dorchester hotel.
    [Show full text]
  • Banskobystrický Region - Case Study Report
    BANSKOBYSTRICKÝ REGION - CASE STUDY REPORT (WP6, Task 3) Ján Buček Ján Buček Department of Human Geography and Demography Comenius University, Bratislava, Slovakia March 2014 The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Union's Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) under grant agreement “Growth-Innovation-Competitiveness: Fostering Cohesion in Central and Eastern Europe” (GRNCOH) 1 1. INTRODUCTION This report had been prepared within GRINCOH project conducted in selected regions of Central and Eastern European countries. In wider terms it reflects the development in Banskobystrický region after 1989, but with special attention to period after the accession to EU and with respect to the global financial crisis impact. It attempts to reveal transformation problems as well as strengths and weaknesses in its regional development, regional policy and use of EU SF support. It is strongly influenced by city region concept, focusing on the role of key city of Banská Bystrica and its neighbouring city of Zvolen. This report is based primarily on standard statistical data, documents and publications available, enriched by 11 in-depth interviews carried out with representatives of institutions active in social and economic life of the region. 1.1. History and location Banskobystrický region (in Slovak – Banskobystrický kraj) is located in southern part of central Slovakia, also as border region with Hungary. It is the largest region of the country (9 454 km2), only Prešovský region in the north-eastern Slovakia (8 973 km2) is the comparable one in terms of territory. The territory of region is composed by contrasting mountain (e.g. about 2000 metres in Nízke Tatry mountains) and valleys areas with large territory covered by forests.
    [Show full text]
  • Maps -- by Region Or Country -- Eastern Hemisphere -- Europe
    G5702 EUROPE. REGIONS, NATURAL FEATURES, ETC. G5702 Alps see G6035+ .B3 Baltic Sea .B4 Baltic Shield .C3 Carpathian Mountains .C6 Coasts/Continental shelf .G4 Genoa, Gulf of .G7 Great Alföld .P9 Pyrenees .R5 Rhine River .S3 Scheldt River .T5 Tisza River 1971 G5722 WESTERN EUROPE. REGIONS, NATURAL G5722 FEATURES, ETC. .A7 Ardennes .A9 Autoroute E10 .F5 Flanders .G3 Gaul .M3 Meuse River 1972 G5741.S BRITISH ISLES. HISTORY G5741.S .S1 General .S2 To 1066 .S3 Medieval period, 1066-1485 .S33 Norman period, 1066-1154 .S35 Plantagenets, 1154-1399 .S37 15th century .S4 Modern period, 1485- .S45 16th century: Tudors, 1485-1603 .S5 17th century: Stuarts, 1603-1714 .S53 Commonwealth and protectorate, 1660-1688 .S54 18th century .S55 19th century .S6 20th century .S65 World War I .S7 World War II 1973 G5742 BRITISH ISLES. GREAT BRITAIN. REGIONS, G5742 NATURAL FEATURES, ETC. .C6 Continental shelf .I6 Irish Sea .N3 National Cycle Network 1974 G5752 ENGLAND. REGIONS, NATURAL FEATURES, ETC. G5752 .A3 Aire River .A42 Akeman Street .A43 Alde River .A7 Arun River .A75 Ashby Canal .A77 Ashdown Forest .A83 Avon, River [Gloucestershire-Avon] .A85 Avon, River [Leicestershire-Gloucestershire] .A87 Axholme, Isle of .A9 Aylesbury, Vale of .B3 Barnstaple Bay .B35 Basingstoke Canal .B36 Bassenthwaite Lake .B38 Baugh Fell .B385 Beachy Head .B386 Belvoir, Vale of .B387 Bere, Forest of .B39 Berkeley, Vale of .B4 Berkshire Downs .B42 Beult, River .B43 Bignor Hill .B44 Birmingham and Fazeley Canal .B45 Black Country .B48 Black Hill .B49 Blackdown Hills .B493 Blackmoor [Moor] .B495 Blackmoor Vale .B5 Bleaklow Hill .B54 Blenheim Park .B6 Bodmin Moor .B64 Border Forest Park .B66 Bourne Valley .B68 Bowland, Forest of .B7 Breckland .B715 Bredon Hill .B717 Brendon Hills .B72 Bridgewater Canal .B723 Bridgwater Bay .B724 Bridlington Bay .B725 Bristol Channel .B73 Broads, The .B76 Brown Clee Hill .B8 Burnham Beeches .B84 Burntwick Island .C34 Cam, River .C37 Cannock Chase .C38 Canvey Island [Island] 1975 G5752 ENGLAND.
    [Show full text]
  • (Opiliones) in a Submountain Beech Forest
    FOLIA OECOLOGICA – vol. 46, no. 1 (2019), doi: 10.2478/foecol-2019-0002 The influence of stand density on the structure of harvestmen communities (Opiliones) in a submountain beech forest Slavomír Stašiov*, Marek Svitok Department of Biology and General Ecology, Faculty of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, Technical University in Zvolen, T. G. Masaryka 24, SK-960 53 Zvolen, Slovak Republic Abstract Stašiov, S., Svitok, M., 2019. The influence of stand density on the structure of harvestmen communities (Opiliones) in a submountain beech forest. Folia Oecologica, 46: 10–15. Modification of forest stand density by thinning is a common silvicultural practice implemented in manage- ment of production forests. However, changes in the stand density can entail considerable changes to the pre- sent forest environment and communities. The current knowledge about the effect of stand density modifica- tion on the local animal communities is based mainly on the flagship groups such as carabid beetles or birds. We focused our study on harvestmen. We explored how the stand density influences species composition of this species communities in submountain beech forests. The study was conducted in the Kováčovská dolina valley (Kremnické vrchy Mts, Central Slovakia) in 1997 and 1998, the method used was pitfall trapping. In total, 9 harvestmen species from 5 families were recorded. Prior to our research, the forest stands at the study locality were subject to thinning interventions the intensity of which influenced the structure of the local harvestmen communities. The most pronounced was the effect of very intensive thinning with stand density reduced below 0.5. From the recorded species, four preferred forest stands with lower stand density (Lopho- pilio palpinalis, Oligolophus tridens, Nemastoma lugubre, Trogulus nepaeformis), two species (Platybunus bucephalus, Dicranolasma scabrum) preferred forest stands with higher stand density.
    [Show full text]
  • Warsaw Pact Mobilization and Reinforcement
    0 APPROVED FOR RELEASE - HISTORICAL COLLECTION DIVISION HR70-14 DATE: 07-18-2012 Interagency Team on . Mobilization and Reinforcement of the Verification Panel Working Group for MUTUAL AND BALANCED FORCE REDUCTION WARSAW PACT MOBILIZATION AND REINFORCEMENT SR JS 71-2 February 171 ET The Report in Brief 1. The Objective This report is an interagency assessment of the organization,.operation, and size of a Soviet and East European mobilization and reinforcement in an- ticipation of imminent hostilities against the Central Region of NATO. The work underlying this report has concerned itself primarily with the mobilization and movement of forces from the USSR (Baltic, Carpathian, and Belorussian military districts). The report was prepared in accordance with the directions and guidance of the Verification Panel Working Group for MBFR and the Staff of the National Security Council. 2. Mobilization From an examination of all available intelligence on the mobilization requirements, procedures, and potential capabilities of the USSR and of the East European nations, we conclude that there are no serious obstacles to the rapid peacetime mobilization of the force with which the USSR would seek to reinforce against the NATO Central Region. The Findings: There is good evidence that the Warsaw Pact would seek to create a five-front force of some 1.3 million men for a campaign in Central Europe. The five fronts would contain 20 field armies, 83 divisions, and five tactical air armies. To build this force, some seven Soviet field armies containing 25 divisions plus three Soviet tactical air armies would be brought from the USSR. This reinforcing Soviet force could be filled out in one to two days with some 200,000 men and 50,000 major items of equipment.
    [Show full text]
  • Blueprint Capacity-Building Strategy for Central, Eastern and South Eastern Europe
    Blueprint Capacity-Building Strategy for Central, Eastern and South Eastern Europe The Blueprint document was elaborated jointly by the Steering Group, established at the Periodic Reporting workshop in Tbilisi in November 2012, the Advisory Body ICCROM and the World Heritage from the Training and Capacity-Building questionnaire sent out to the States Parties of the Central, Eastern and South-Eastern Europe region in January 2012. The Blueprint is proposed to the States Parties as a basis for the elaboration and implementation of the sub-regional capacity-building strategy. Contents 1. Aim of the blueprint 2. Vision 3. Background 4. Brief overview on the current Training and Capacity-Building in Central, Eastern and South Eastern Europe 5. Availability of Training and Capacity-Building 6. Training needs 7. Needs in relation to training materials and toolkits 8. Targeted audience in relation to Training and Capacity-Building 9. Underlying considerations 10. Regional best-practices to be explored 11.Funding matters 12. A note on information resources 13. Specic approaches regarding training and capacity building 14.What can be done? Ideas concerning coordination and implementation of the strategy 15. Contact point at the World Heritage Centre ANNEX I: List of relevant providers of the World Heritage training /capacity-building ANNEX II: Summary of the responses to the training and capacity-building questionnaire 1. Aim of the blueprint The aim of the blueprint is to provide a conceptual framework for the elaboration of a strategy to develop effective actions and programmes to strengthen capacities of practitioners, institutions, educational facilities, communities and networks for the conservation and management of World Heritage and sites on national Tentative Lists in the Central, Eastern and South Eastern region.
    [Show full text]
  • User Guide Volume 2
    CHANGES TO CODING FRAMES - FEBRUARY 2000 TO JANUARY 2001 NB: the previous note indicated changes for February 1999 to January 2000. A1 & A1(2) - Country codes There are NO NEW CODES from February 2000. A2, A3 & A3(2) - County/Unitary Authority/London Borough & Town codes From January 2001, the 3-digit county/unitary authority/London Borough codes on A2 (Q6) are being replaced by 5-digit codes in line with the town codes on A3 (Q60). Of course, the first 3 digits of the town code are the same as the old county code. However, there are some exceptions: On the A2 (Q6), London Borough codes 066 – 097, and 098 (Barking & Dagenham – Wandsworth, and London Borough not known) have been deleted and are replaced by the following codes: Barking & Dagenham 70100 Barnet 70200 Bexley 70300 Brent 70400 Bromley 70500 Camden 70600 City of London/Westminster 70700 Croydon 70800 Ealing 70900 Enfield 71000 Greenwich 71100 Hackney 71200 Hammersmith & Fulham 71300 Haringey 71400 Harrow 71500 Havering 71600 Hillingdon 71700 Hounslow 71800 Islington 71900 Kensington & Chelsea 72000 Kingston upon Thames 72100 Lambeth 72200 Lewisham 72300 Merton 72400 Newham 72500 Redbridge 72600 Richmond upon Thames 72700 Southwark 72800 Sutton 72900 Tower Hamlets 73000 Waltham Forest 73100 Wandsworth 73200 DK London Borough 79900 On A3 (Q60), Greater London still has the town code 77777. On both A2 and A3 , Northern Ireland-all towns, formerly coded 600 at Q6 and 99993 at Q60, is now coded 60000. Also from January 2001, the following town codes on A3 (Q60 only) are reinstated for Channel Islands and Isle of Man (to be used when visited by foreign residents on a side-trip): Isle of Man-Other 03800 Douglas – Isle of Man 03801 Peel – Isle of Man 03802 Ramsey - Isle of Man 03803 Kirkmichael – Isle of Man 03804 Castletown – Isle of Man 03805 Guernsey – Channel Islands 04801 Alderney – Channel Islands 04802 Sark – Channel Islands 04803 Jersey - Channel Islands 04900 On A2 (Q6), DK Town/County/Unitary Authority is now coded 99999.
    [Show full text]
  • A Pan-European Case Study
    Environmental Science & Policy 54 (2015) 268–280 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Environmental Science & Policy jo urnal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/envsci Mapping green infrastructure based on ecosystem services and ecological networks: A Pan-European case study a,b, b c d a Camino Liquete *, Stefan Kleeschulte , Gorm Dige , Joachim Maes , Bruna Grizzetti , e d Branislav Olah , Grazia Zulian a European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Institute for Environment and Sustainability (IES), Water Resources Unit, Via Enrico Fermi 2749, 21027 Ispra, VA, Italy b GeoVille Environmental Services, 3 Z.I. Bombicht, L-6947 Niederanven, Luxembourg c European Environment Agency, Natural Systems and Vulnerability, Kongens Nytorv 6, 1050 Copenhagen K, Denmark d European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Institute for Environment and Sustainability (IES), Sustainability Assessment Unit, Via Enrico Fermi 2749, 21027 Ispra, VA, Italy e Technical University in Zvolen, Faculty of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, Department of Applied Ecology, Masaryka 24, 96053 Zvolen, Slovakia A R T I C L E I N F O A B S T R A C T Article history: Identifying, promoting and preserving a strategically planned green infrastructure (GI) network can Received 9 March 2015 provide ecological, economic and social benefits. It has also become a priority for the planning and Received in revised form 26 June 2015 decision-making process in sectors such as conservation, (land) resource efficiency, agriculture, forestry Accepted 9 July 2015 or urban development. In this paper we propose a methodology that can be used to identify and map GI elements at Keywords: landscape level based on the notions of ecological connectivity, multi-functionality of ecosystems and Green infrastructure maximisation of benefits both for humans and for natural conservation.
    [Show full text]