The Person of Eve in Paradise Lost

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Person of Eve in Paradise Lost The Person of Eve in Paradise Lost -- The Person of Eve in Paradise Lost by Marjorie R. Thorpe A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies and Research in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts. Department of English, McGill University, Montreal. April, 1965. Preface In spite of the obvious importance of Eve in Paradise Lost there has not been, to date, any full critical analysis of her person. True, many critics have considered her relationship to Adam, and have remarked on the manner in which her nature complements his; but beyond this, little has been said. In this paper an attempt is made to provide a sustained and detailed examination of Eve and of her role in the epie. Throughout I have used the text of Paradise Lost edited by Merritt Y. Hughes, (New York>l935). My indebtedness to Joseph H. Summers and J. B. Broadbent will be immediately evident. I wish to express my thanks to the staff of the Redpath Library, to the members of the McGill English Department..>and especially to Dr. A. E. l'Œalloch whose lectures on Paradise Lost during my Under-graduate years so greatly assisted in my appreciation of the poem. ii Contents Chapter I 1 Exposition Chapter II The Fa11 18 Chapter III The Effects of the Fa11 29 List of Works Cited 4.3 iii Chapter I On reading the biblical version of the Creation and Fall of Adam and Eve (Genesis ii-iii) we find that the presentation lends itself to two possible interpretations: en the one hand, we may regard the narrative as being a mere his tory of two lives;. or, what is more likely, we may see in the report an attempt to explain the present state of the World through an allegorical account of the entrance of evil into the mind of Man and so into the Macrocosm. That Milton considered the story in both these lights, his portrayal of Adam and Eve in Paradise Lost would seem to suggest; for they appear before us, not only as individuals, but also as the embodiments of different attributes of Hankind, under the controlling influence of one Soul, one Mind and one Will. This thesis attempts a detailed study of Milton's Eve. The discussion, consequently, does not confine itself to a consideration of her role in the poem, but tries to show the extent to which her native qualities fit her for the part she is required to play. Dr. Joseph Summers, in his work The Muse•s ~~thod,.. has declared the first twenty-six lines of Paradise Lost to be a compendium of the entire poem: The modern reader should consider those extraordinar,y- first two sentences of the poem ••• as the "proposal 11 of the "Whole Subject" in the widest possible sense. c. s. Lewis 2 has suggested that the opening twenty-six lines ttgive us the sensation that sorne great thing is _now about to begin;" I believe that in them the "great thing11 has already begun. The poem tells us what the greatest single long poem in English is to be about; it is also the poem in miniature:l In like manner, we may regard the first description of Adam and Eve (IV. 288-311) as a contracted presentation of all that is later revealed in their relations with God, with Nature, and with each other. The pertinence of this portrait must be allowed when we remember that the very nature of Paradise precludes all discrepancy between appearances and reality -- a telling point in the case of the serpent: close the Serpent sly Insinuating, wove with Gordian twine His braided train, and of his fatal guile Gave proof unheeded •••• (IV. 347-350) His devious potential (ttsly", "Insinuating", "Gordian twine"), ·- his beauty (ttbraided train"), and the propriety of his -- subsequent role in the Fall (~atal guile • • • unheedect} are all briefly suggested in these four lines; and, similarly, we discover in the account of our first parents that no word or phrase has been admitted which is not fraught with sorne special significance. The first eight lines of the description (IV. 288-295) deal with the role of Man in the Creation: Two of far nobler shape erect and tall, Godlike erect, with native Honour clad In naked Majesty seem'd Lords of all, And worthy seem'd, for in thir looks Divine lJoseph H. Summers, The Muse's Method (London, 1962), p.ll. 3 The image of thir glorious Maker shone, Truth, Wisdom, Sanctitude severe and pure, Severe, but in true. filial freedom plac't; Whence true autority in men •••• That the integrity of Man lies in the union of two beings is immediately implied. Then his posture (uGodlike erect") reveals that he alone of all the creatures in Eden bears a special affinity to the Maker. Next, his supremacy on earth is indicated ("In naked Majesty seem'd Lords of all"}, the words "nakedtt and 11 seem'd" both intimating that this sovereignty is obvious to all who see him. But further, "nakedn reminds us that Man is devoid of all physical clothing and takes us back to the phrase "with native Honour clad". As the crown of Creation, all the perfections of Nature find their epitome in him, so that the Virtue which emanates from within his earthly mould envelops him like a robe, and automatically renders him a being worthy of respect and reverence. Continuing, we discover the basis of Man's relation- ship with God. His is a strict and disinterested devotion 1 to the Creator (lfSanctitude severe and pure• ) and, what is .. more, his service is entirely voluntary ('•in true filial 11 freedom plac't; ). In no way constrained to worship the Maker, Man's attitude is dictated by a sense of love and respect for the Father, rather than by any feeling of compulsion; moreover, it is by virtue of this response that he enjoys supremacy ori earth (tt\thence true autority in men") 4 for, as long as the "Truth" and ••wisdomtt with which he is endowed prompt him to persevere in a proper knowledge and acceptance of God, the earth and all other living creatures will freely support and respond to his avery assertion of leadership. The next phase of the description (IV. 295-311) distinguishes the two sexes and discusses them in relation to each other: • • • though both = Not equal, as their sex not equal seem'd; For contemplation hee and valour form'd, Fàr softness shee and sweet attractive Grace, Hee for God only, shee for God in him: (IV. 295-299) That the force of the words "not equal" do not here imply a basic deficiency on the part of the woman, but rather declare the separateness of the female role from that of the male in the Creation, the subsequent delineation of their individual qualities very clearly indicates. To him is given the power to act. To her, the capacity to respond. True, she supplies him with the stimulus. Her "sweet attractive Grace" invites and holds his "contemplationtt; but then, his resulting "valour" is countered with a 11 softnesatt that ensures its effectivenesa. While he perfects his nature in a spontaneous responae to the Divine, she properly fulfills her being by a natural acceptance of his influence (Hee for ft God only, shee for God in him). nAbsolute rule" on earth is his peculiar gift from God. She justifies her claim to 5 authority in her relations with him. Her "golden tresses", we are told, flow "as a veil" down to the waist. The bridal image serves as a brief reminder that they are united in marriage; and, as the "gold 11 of her tresses merges with the ether tints in his hair to produce "Hyacinthine locksu, so too we find her person mingling with his in the formation of one perfect personality. Again, she wears her hair Dishevell 1 d, but in wanton ringlets wav•d As the Vine curls her tendrils, which impli'd Subjection, but requir'd with gentle sway, And by her yielded, by him best receiv'd, Yielded with coy submission, modest pride, And sweet reluctant amorous delay. (IV. 306-311) The words nDishevell' d n and "wanton•• convey an impression of freedom, and the notion is carried over into the line 11 Subjection, but requir'd with gentle sway"; for the phrase 11 gentle sway" not only defines the nature of his control, but also infera the possible withdrawal of her allegiance. Yet, the simile of the Vine2 purports that she will be in need of support and guidance; thus, she wisely and willingly places herself under the leadership of the one person who can 2The duties which the human couple perform in the garden further suggest the similarity between their relations and those of the Vine and Elm: . • • • or they led the Vine To wed her Elm; she spous•d about him twines Her marriageable arros, and with her brings Her dow•r th' adopted Clusters, to adorn His barren leaves •••• (V. 215-219) 6 furnish her with proper direction ("And by her yielded, by him best receiv'd"). Nevertheless, although she obviously acknowledges his government, she does not retain any sense of inferiority. She yields to him with ••• coy submission, modest pride, And sweet reluctant amorous delay. (IV. 310-311) Rightly conscious of her own personal worth, she displays an instinctive desire to protect her identity.3 Su ch then appears to be Mil ton' s conception of the human pair. Let us now consider how these initial suggestions are elaborated and exemplified in later passages.
Recommended publications
  • Sin. Systematic Theology.Wayne Grudem
    Systematic Theology Wayne Grudem Chapter 24! SIN What is sin? Where did it come from? Do we inherit a sinful nature from Adam? Do we inherit guilt from Adam? EXPLANATION AND SCRIPTURAL BASIS A. The Definition of Sin The history of the human race as presented in Scripture is primarily a history of man in a state of sin and rebellion against God and of God’s plan of redemption to bring man back to himself. Therefore, it is appropriate now to consider the nature of the sin that separates man from God. We may define sin as follows: Sin is any failure to conform to the moral law of God in act, attitude, or nature. Sin is here defined in relation to God and his moral law. Sin includes not only individual acts such as stealing or lying or committing murder, but also attitudes that are contrary to the attitudes God requires of us. We see this already in the Ten Commandments, which not only prohibit sinful actions but also wrong attitudes: “You shall not covet your neighbor’s house. You shall not covet your neighbor’s wife, or his manservant or maidservant, his ox or donkey, or anything that belongs to your neighbor” (Ex. 20:17 NIV). Here God specifies that a desire to steal or to commit adultery is also sin in his sight. The Sermon on the Mount also prohibits sinful attitudes such as anger (Matt. 5:22) or lust (Matt. 5:28). Paul lists attitudes such as jealousy, anger, and selfishness (Gal. 5:20) as things that are works of the flesh opposed to the desires of the Spirit (Gal.
    [Show full text]
  • The Fall of Satan in the Thought of St. Ephrem and John Milton
    Hugoye: Journal of Syriac Studies, Vol. 3.1, 3–27 © 2000 [2010] by Beth Mardutho: The Syriac Institute and Gorgias Press THE FALL OF SATAN IN THE THOUGHT OF ST. EPHREM AND JOHN MILTON GARY A. ANDERSON HARVARD DIVINITY SCHOOL CAMBRIDGE, MA USA ABSTRACT In the Life of Adam and Eve, Satan “the first-born” refused to venerate Adam, the “latter-born.” Later writers had difficulty with the tale because it granted Adam honors that were proper to Christ (Philippians 2:10, “at the name of Jesus, every knee should bend.”) The tale of Satan’s fall was then altered to reflect this Christological sensibility. Milton created a story of Christ’s elevation prior to the creation of man. Ephrem, on the other hand, moved the story to Holy Saturday. In Hades, Death acknowledged Christ as the true first- born whereas Satan rejected any such acclamation. [1] For some time I have pondered the problem of Satan’s fall in early Jewish and Christian sources. My point of origin has been the justly famous account found in the Life of Adam and Eve (hereafter: Life).1 1 See G. Anderson, “The Exaltation of Adam and the Fall of Satan,” Journal of Jewish Thought and Philosophy, 6 (1997): 105–34. 3 4 Gary A. Anderson I say justly famous because the Life itself existed in six versions- Greek, Latin, Armenian, Georgian, Slavonic, and Coptic (now extant only in fragments)-yet the tradition that the Life drew on is present in numerous other documents from Late Antiquity.2 And one should mention its surprising prominence in Islam-the story was told and retold some seven times in the Koran and was subsequently subject to further elaboration among Muslim exegetes and storytellers.3 My purpose in this essay is to carry forward work I have already done on this text to the figures of St.
    [Show full text]
  • Janson. History of Art. Chapter 16: The
    16_CH16_P556-589.qxp 12/10/09 09:16 Page 556 16_CH16_P556-589.qxp 12/10/09 09:16 Page 557 CHAPTER 16 CHAPTER The High Renaissance in Italy, 1495 1520 OOKINGBACKATTHEARTISTSOFTHEFIFTEENTHCENTURY , THE artist and art historian Giorgio Vasari wrote in 1550, Truly great was the advancement conferred on the arts of architecture, painting, and L sculpture by those excellent masters. From Vasari s perspective, the earlier generation had provided the groundwork that enabled sixteenth-century artists to surpass the age of the ancients. Later artists and critics agreed Leonardo, Bramante, Michelangelo, Raphael, Giorgione, and with Vasari s judgment that the artists who worked in the decades Titian were all sought after in early sixteenth-century Italy, and just before and after 1500 attained a perfection in their art worthy the two who lived beyond 1520, Michelangelo and Titian, were of admiration and emulation. internationally celebrated during their lifetimes. This fame was For Vasari, the artists of this generation were paragons of their part of a wholesale change in the status of artists that had been profession. Following Vasari, artists and art teachers of subse- occurring gradually during the course of the fifteenth century and quent centuries have used the works of this 25-year period which gained strength with these artists. Despite the qualities of between 1495 and 1520, known as the High Renaissance, as a their births, or the differences in their styles and personalities, benchmark against which to measure their own. Yet the idea of a these artists were given the respect due to intellectuals and High Renaissance presupposes that it follows something humanists.
    [Show full text]
  • Using Scriptural Data to Calculate a Range-Qualified Chronology from Adam to Abraham
    Using Scriptural Data to Calculate a Range-Qualified Chronology from Adam to Abraham With Comments on Why the "Open"-or-"Closed" Genealogy Question Is Chronometrically Irrelevant By: Thomas D. Ice, Th.M., Ph.D. Director, Pre-Trib Research Center Adjunct Professor, Tyndale Theological Seminary James J. Scofield Johnson, Th.D., D.C.Ed. Master Faculty, LeTourneau University Biblical Languages Instructor, Cross Timbers Institute Presented at the Southwest Regional Meeting of the Evangelical Theological Society at The Criswell College in Dallas, Texas on March 1, 2002. And God said, "Let there be lights in the firmament of the heaven to divide the day from the night; and let them be for signs, and for seasons, and for days, and for years...." (Genesis 1:14) I. Introductory Overview God intended that His human creatures would be able to use the sun to calculate time on Earth, in years.1 The regular amount of time used when the Earth orbits around the sun is called a "year."2 Because earthly sun-orbits recur on a regular3 basis (and that is reliable and true because God made it to be so), years are a reliable and true time-unit for quantifying time on the Earth.4 The physical universe exists in space, time, and matter-energy (the latter category being a more technical name for "stuff"). God made time "in the beginning," at the same time when He made space and matter-energy. God works in time, not because He must but because He wanted to. God made mankind to live, on Earth, inside time (and space and stuff).
    [Show full text]
  • The Divine Wisdom of Michelangelo in "The Creation of Adam" Author(S): Maria Rzepińska Source: Artibus Et Historiae, Vol
    The Divine Wisdom of Michelangelo in "The Creation of Adam" Author(s): Maria Rzepińska Source: Artibus et Historiae, Vol. 15, No. 29 (1994), pp. 181-187 Published by: IRSA s.c. Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1483492 . Accessed: 28/08/2011 13:02 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. IRSA s.c. is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Artibus et Historiae. http://www.jstor.org MARIARZEPINSKA The Divine Wisdom of Michelangelo in The Creationof Adam The reemergence of long obscured details in Michel- Jesus from the Doni Tondo,de Tolnaysays, and he concludes angelo's newly cleaned frescoes on the ceiling of the Sistine that just as the female figure is the idea of Eve, so the putto is Chapel has prompted fresh interest in the ideological pro- the idea of Christ.3Michelangelo thus intended to convey the gram as a whole.' The focus of this article is one such detail in Platonic view that these two ideas had already preexisted in The Creation of Adam [Figs. 1-2]. This is a female figure sur- God's mind.4 rounded by smaller figures enveloped in the windblown Another interpretation of the puzzling female figure has mantle of the Creator,and identifiableas putti or angels.
    [Show full text]
  • Sacred Art and the Beatitudes Obedience
    The Creation of Adam BY MICHELANGELO BUONARROTI (C. 1511) Michelangelo Buonarroti, “The Creation of Adam.” Circa 1511. Fresco. Sistine Chapel, Apostolic Palace, Vatican City. DIGITAL IMAGES AVAILABLE AT WWW.SOPHIAINSTITUTEFORTEACHERS.ORG Sacred Art and the Beatitudes Our Ultimate End Is Heaven The Creation of Adam, by Michelangelo Buonarroti (c. 1511) Directions: Take some time to quietly view and reflect on the art. Let yourself be inspired in any way that happens naturally. Then think about the questions below, and discuss them with your classmates. Conversation Questions 1. Whom do you see in this fresco, and what appears to be happening? 2. What do you notice about the colors the artist chose? How does the light look? Where is it coming from? 3. What are some feelings that this painting inspires in you? 4. How does Adam’s posture differ from the Father’s? 5. Why do you think Michelangelo painted the Father’s hand and Adam’s hand almost, but not quite, touching? 6. Who do you think are the figures with the Father? Why do you think so? 7. Read Genesis 1:26-27. How does this painting enhance your understanding of these verses? 8. Some physicians have suggested that the shape behind God the Father resembles the outline of a human brain. If this is true, why might Michelangelo have painted it that way? 9. How does this painting depict the ultimate end for which we are created? © SOPHIA INSTITUTE FOR TEACHERS 3 The Calling of St. Matthew BY CARAVAGGIO (C. 1599-1600) Caravaggio, The Calling of St.
    [Show full text]
  • Lesson 2 the Fall of Man Genesis 2
    Lesson 2 The Fall of Man Genesis 2 OBJECTIVE: To develop better work habits to improve your work. To understand rest is important for efficiency. To understand you are a unique and special person. Chapter One Review: God Worked Lesson Idea 1: Improve Your Work Habits In this chapter, God is completing His work. He worked for six straight days, designing and creating and forming all that He wanted upon the earth. QUESTION: What do we notice about God’s work habits from chapter one? Note five characteristics about the way God went about His work: 1. ______________________________________ 2. ______________________________________ 3. ______________________________________ 4. ______________________________________ 5. ______________________________________ Describe your current work habits: _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ What is it that you need to change about your work habits in order to be more efficient? _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ One important point to note about God: *God had no one else to help Him. Everything He needed to design a world was within Him. What does that say about you, as one who is created in the image of God? Work Advice: “Spend time studying your craft.” Chapter Two: God Rested Lesson Idea 2: Take a Day for Rest Read Genesis 2:1-3 God did something very interesting after His six days of working. When everything was done, verse two says He rested. As a result, from all the work that He had done, all the energy He exhibited, and all the mental thinking, He rested. 6 God on the seventh day did two things: 1. He blessed the seventh day – He “praised” the seventh day 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Demon at the Doorstep: Lilith As a Reflection of Anxieties and Desires in Ancient, Rabbinic, and Medieval Jewish Sexuality Lauren Kinrich Pomona College
    Claremont Colleges Scholarship @ Claremont Pomona Senior Theses Pomona Student Scholarship 2011 Demon at the Doorstep: Lilith as a Reflection of Anxieties and Desires in Ancient, Rabbinic, and Medieval Jewish Sexuality Lauren Kinrich Pomona College Recommended Citation Kinrich, Lauren, "Demon at the Doorstep: Lilith as a Reflection of Anxieties and Desires in Ancient, Rabbinic, and Medieval Jewish Sexuality" (2011). Pomona Senior Theses. Paper 4. http://scholarship.claremont.edu/pomona_theses/4 This Open Access Senior Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Pomona Student Scholarship at Scholarship @ Claremont. It has been accepted for inclusion in Pomona Senior Theses by an authorized administrator of Scholarship @ Claremont. For more information, please contact [email protected]. DEMON AT THE DOORSTEP: LILITH AS A REFLECTION OF ANXIETIES AND DESIRES IN ANCIENT, RABBINIC, AND MEDIEVAL JEWISH SEXUALITY BY LAUREN KINRICH SUBMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF RELIGIOUS STUDIES OF POMONA COLLEGE IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF BACHELOR OF ARTS PROFESOR ERIN RUNIONS PROFESSOR OONA EISENSTADT APRIL 22, 2011 O you who fly in (the) darkened room(s) Be off with you this instant, this instant, Lilith Thief, breaker of bones. ACKNOWLEGEMENTS I would like to thank, first and foremost, Professors Erin Runions and Oona Eisenstadt, for providing me with so much inspiration, and for being, each in your own way, exactly the kind of readers and advisors I needed. To Professor Runions, for inspiring me to pursue this path, for guiding me through Religious Studies at Pomona, for pushing my thesis to greater depth and rigor than I would have thought I could produce, and for your constant insight and encouragement.
    [Show full text]
  • The Fall of Man and Original Sin in the Theology of Gregory of Nyssa
    THE FALL OF MAN AND ORIGINAL SIN IN THE THEOLOGY OF GREGORY OF NYSSA ERNEST V. McCLEAR, S J. St. Mary of the Lake Seminary HE question of the teaching of the Greek Fathers on original sin is Tas old as St. Augustine, and yet, for historians of dogma, it is still a living question. When St. Augustine was accused of innovation in teaching that Adam's sin passed to his descendants, he appealed to a number of the Western and Eastern Fathers. Among the latter we find two of the Cappadocians, St. Basil and St. Gregory Nazianzen.1 In early modern times the question again attracted attention. Pe- tavius noted in his study of the Immaculate Conception that, "Graeci . originalis fere criminis raram nee disertam mentionem scriptis suis attigerunt."2 Jean Gamier (1612-1681) states in his celebrated essay "De ortu et incrementis haeresis Pelagianae," that before the Bishop of Hippo the doctrine was obscure among the Latins as well as the Greeks.8 Ιη. modern times many monographs have appeared on various Greek Fathers. Competent scholars have examined their teaching in detail, yet diversity of opinion in regard to their doctrine on original sin is still common. In a study which appeared in 1924, Professor René Draguet maintained that many of the Greek Fathers refused to admit that man is born in a state of sin.4 Draguet's position was questioned by Martin Jugie, the celebrated authority on the Greek Church.5 Jugie not only contests Draguet's conclusions, but also takes exception to the way in which M.
    [Show full text]
  • The Myth of the Creation of Woman in Genesis 2: 18–23 and Its Possible Translations – the Consequences for Christian Anthropology
    Studia Religiologica 47 (2) 2014, s. 77–88 doi:10.4467/20844077SR.14.006.2379 www.ejournals.eu/Studia-Religiologica The Myth of the Creation of Woman in Genesis 2: 18–23 and its Possible Translations – the Consequences for Christian Anthropology Aleksander Gomola UNESCO Chair in Translation Studies and Intercultural Communication Jagiellonian University in Krakow Abstract This article discusses selected examples of English and Polish translations of the myth of the crea- tion of man in Genesis 2, 18–23. Its purpose is to present various translations of the Hebrew text resulting from the polysemic character of the Hebrew terms adam and ezer kenegedo and how they may lead to different versions of the Christian anthropology and male-female relationships. The article presents the feminist interpretations of Genesis 2, 18–23 as well as its two different contem- porary Polish Catholic translations resulting in two different versions of the Christian anthropology. In the conclusions, the author points to the role of translation as a factor inevitably modifying (warping) the original text. Key words: myth, creation, woman, translation, Bible, feminism Słowa kluczowe: mit, stworzenie, kobieta. przekład, Biblia, feminizm The ancient nature of myths involves their being passed down through generations and across cultures. The transfer of myths, especially between cultures and civilisa- tions, is achieved mainly by the translation process and everything that goes with it, namely various forms of interpretation, adaptation or even distortion. Names of mythical heroes are changed, as in the case of Greek and Roman mythologies, narra- tives are adapted to local needs, some are expanded, others censored.
    [Show full text]
  • Twenty-Five Short Answers to Big Questions About Creation
    Twenty-Five Short Answers to Big Questions About Creation Ian Taylor © 2010, 2012, Ian Taylor, Creation Moments Twenty-Five Short Answers to Big Questions About Creation CONTENTS 1 Were there Pre-Adamic civilizations? 4 2 What is the Day-Age Theory? 6 3 Was each day of Creation Week 1,000 years? 8 4 What about the Gap Theory (a.k.a. the Ruin and Reconstruction Theory)? 10 5 What are the Tranquil Flood and Local Flood Theories? 12 6 What is the Progressive Creation Theory? 14 7 What color was Adam? 16 8 Why did Adam have to name all the animals? 18 9 How long were Adam and Eve in the Garden of Eden? 20 10 Did dinosaurs live in the Garden of Eden? 22 11 Why did God curse the ground and not Adam? 24 12 What was the curse placed upon Eve? 26 13 Did Adam really live for 930 years? 28 14 How many were Adam and Eve’s children? 30 15 Did Adam and Eve’s children practice incest? 32 16 Why did Cain kill his brother Abel? 34 17 Who was Cain’s wife? 36 18 What is wrong with Michelangelo’s Creation of Adam? 38 19 Have remains of human giants been discovered? 40 20 Has Mankind evolved or devolved? 42 21 Where did our moon come from? 44 22 Is the light from distant stars proof for millions of years? 46 23 Can the millions of years demanded by geology be refuted? 48 24 How did the birds evolve? 50 25 Can Evolution Theory explain human consciousness? 52 Theories used by Christians to reconcile the Creation account with evolution.
    [Show full text]
  • RENAISSANCE Humanrsm MICHELANGELOTS SISTINE CHAPEL a M MILTON's PARADISE LOST
    RENAISSANCE HUMANrSM IN MICHELANGELOTSSISTINE CHAPEL Am MILTON'S PARADISE LOST ERIN ELIZABETH McCONOMY DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH McGILL UNIVERSITY, MONTREAL JULY 1997 A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies and Research in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Master of Arts. Copyright Erin Elizabeth McConomy, 1997. National Library Bibliothèque nationale 1*1 ofCanada du Canada Acquisitions and Acquisitions et Bibliographie Services services bibliographiques 395 Wellington Street 395. rue Wellington Ottawa ON K1A ON4 Ottawa ON K1A ON4 Canada Canada Your fiie Votre reference Our rYe Notre reference The author has granted a non- L'auteur a accorde une licence non exclusive licence allowing the exclusive permettant à la National Library of Canada to Bibliothèque nationale du Canada de reproduce, 10% distribute or sell reproduire, prêter, distribuer ou copies of this thesis in microfonn, vendre des copies de cette thèse sous paper or electronic formats. la forme de microfiche/6lm, de reproduction sur papier ou sur format électronique. The author retains ownership of the L'auteur conserve la propriété du copyright in this thesis. Neither the droit d'auteur qui protège cette thèse. thesis nor substarntid extracts fiom it Ni la thèse ni des extraits substantiels may be printed or otherwise de celle-ci ne doivent être imprimés reproduced without the author's ou autrement reproduits sans son permission. autorisation. "If a man who does not admire Michael Ange10 talks of his love for Milton: he is deceiving either himself or his listeners." Oscar Wilde TABLE OF CONTENTS ... Acknowledgements III Abstract iv Abstrait v Introduction 1 Chapter One: Humanism in the Sistine Chape1 Ceiling Frescoes 10 Appendix: Illustrations for Chapter One 37 Chapter Two: Humanism in Paradise Lost 46 Chapter Three: The Sistine Ceiling and Paradise Lost Compared 80 Conclusion 113 List of Works Cited 117 McConomy iii In writing this thesis 1 have indebted myself to several individuals who have helped me at various stages of its production.
    [Show full text]