DOCSLIB.ORG

The London Gazette, 27Th May 1988 6283 Gas Act 1986

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The London Gazette, 27Th May 1988 6283 Gas Act 1986 THE LONDON GAZETTE, 27TH MAY 1988 6283 where they are open to inspection by any consumer at all (a) The whole of the Cheltenham, Cotswold, Gloucester, reasonable times free of charge. Stroud and Tewkesbury Districts. / Patience. Regional Secretary and Solicitor (b) Part of the Forest of Dean District. Regional Head Office, 24th May 1988 (945) "Riverside", Temple Street, Keynsham, Bristol BS18 1EQ. GAS ACT 1986 SCHEDULE The Gas (Declaration of Calorific Value) Regulations 1972 The Gas (Metrification) Regulations 1980 A Calorific Value of 38.9 Megajoules per cubic metre (1042 British Thermal Units per cubic foot) Notice is hereby given that in pursuance of Regulation 4 of the Gas (Declaration of Calorific Value) Regulations 1972 and 1. The whole of the administrative Counties of Avon and Regulation 3(3) of the Gas (Metrification) Regulations 1980, Cornwall. British Gas pic hereby declare that on and after 1st July 1988 2. The administrative County of Devon: the calorific value of all natural gas in the area of supply of its (a) The whole of the Torridge, North Devon, West Devon, North Eastern Region shall be 39.3 megajoules per cubic metre Mid-Devon, Teignbridge, Exeter, Plymouth, South Hams (1053 British Thermal Units per cubic foot). and Torbay Districts. The said area is described by reference to the Local Authority (b) Part of the East Devon District. districts set put in the Schedule and is delineated by a green line on a map signed by me and kept at the offices of British Gas 3. Within the administrative County of Somerset: North Eastern, New York Road, Leeds, where it is available for (a) The whole of the Sedgemoor, Mendip, West Somerset and inspection by any consumer at all reasonable times, free of Taunton Deane Districts. charge. (b) Part of the Yeovil District. M. Hornsey, Regional Director of Support Services and 4. Within the administrative County of Wiltshire: Administration The whole of the North Wiltshire, Thamesdown, West British Gas pic, North Eastern Wiltshire and Kennet Districts. New York Road, Leeds LS2 7PE 5. Within the administrative County of Berkshire: SCHEDULE Part of the Newbury District. In the County of West Yorkshire, the Districts of Calderdale, 6. Within the administrative County of Oxfordshire: Kirklees, Bradford, Leeds and Wakefield. Part of the West Oxfordshire and Vale of White Horse In the County of South Yorkshire, part of the Districts of Districts. Barnsley and Doncaster. In the County of North Yorkshire, the Districts of Selby, York, 7. Within the administrative County of Warwickshire: Ryedale, Scarborough, and parts of the Districts of Craven, Pan of the Stratford-on-Avon District. Harrogate and Hambleton. 8. Within the administrative County of Hereford and Worcester. In the County, of Humberside, the Districts of North Wolds, Part of the South Herefordshire and Wychavon Districts. Beveiiey, Kingston-upon-Hull, Holderness and Boothferry. 9. Within the administrative County of Gloucestershire: 27th May 1988. (823) ROAD TRAFFIC ACTS BARNSLEY METROPOLITAN BOROUGH COUNCIL The Metropolitan Borough of Barnsley (Off-street Parking Places) (Barnsley) (No. 1) Order 1988 Notice is hereby given that the Borough Council propose to make the above-named Order under sections 35 and 124 of, and Schedule 9 to, the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984. The effect of the Order will be to revoke and reproduce with amendments the provisions of the existing Off-street Parking Places Orders relating to car parks in, and in the vicinity of, Barnsley town centre. The classes of vehicles for which the parking places will be available, the charging hours and the scale of charges to be applied, will be as stated in the First Schedule hereto. The charges for season tickets will be as stated in the Second Schedule hereto. Full details of the conditions under which the parking places may be used are contained in the draft Order, a copy of which together with a plan of the parking places and a statement of reasons for the Order may be seen at the Department of Administration, Town Hall, Barnsley, at the Department of Public Services, Central Offices, Kendray Street, Barnsley, and at the Central Library, Shambles Street, Barnsley, during normal business hours. Any objection to the proposed Order, stating the grounds of objection, should be sent in writing to the Director of Public Services, Central Offices, Kendray Street, Barnsley, not later than the 24th June 1988. D. P. Clephan, Director of Administration Department of Administration, Town Hall, Barnsley. FIRST SCHEDULE Parking Places Classes of Vehicles Charging Hours Scale of Charges Excluding Sundays Standard charge £8 per day OR and Bank Holidays charge shown below for parking ticket. Lancaster Gate Car Park Motorcycles, invalid carriages, 8 a.m. to 6 p.m. St. Mary's Place Car Park motor cars, goods vehicles not exceeding 1525 kg (30 cwt) unladen. Graham's Orchard Car Park Motorcycles, invalid carriages, 8 a.m. to 6 p.m. 40p valid for 2 hours. New Street Car Park motor cars, goods vehicles not exceeding 1525 kg (30 cwt) unladen. Central Offices Car Park Motorcycles, invalid carriages, 8 a.m. to 6 p.m. 40p valid for 2 hours (Saturdays motor cars, goods vehicles not only). exceeding 1525 kg (30 cwt) unladen. Pipers Cottage Car Park Motorcycles, invalid carriages, 8 a.m. to 6 p.m. 20p valid for first 2 hours; 40p for motor cars, goods vehicles not 2 to 4 hours; 60p for over 4 hours. exceeding 1525 kg (30 cwt) unladen..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Place Marketing As a Planning Tool
    PLACE MARKETING AS A PLANNING TOOL JANE GOODENOUGH MPHIL TOWN PLANNING UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON ProQuest Number: 10044386 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest. ProQuest 10044386 Published by ProQuest LLC(2016). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON LIBRARY ABSTRACT This study examines place marketing as a planning tool for local authorities, focusing on the type of marketing designed to attract jobs and investment to an area. Two strands of research emerge from a literature review. Firstly a need to update a 1984 study of local authority marketing activity as place marketing has evolved and escalated since then, and secondly, a need to determine the outcomes from place marketing. A survey of local authorities revealed a 96.5 per cent involvement in place marketing activities in 1995 and an analysis of the same local authorities’ marketing brochures demonstrates both innovative and common approaches. These brochures also show that although many local authorities are operating an equal opportunities policy, these ideals are not filtering through to all aspects of their work.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Government Boundary Commission for England
    If LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND REVIEW OF NON-METROPOLITAN COUNTIES FURTHER REVIEW OF THE COUNTY OF HUMBERSIDE NORTH YORKSHIRE EAST YORKSHIRE HUMBERSIDE EAST YORKSHIRE _J \\HOLDERNESS BOROUGH OF BEVERLEY ^KINGSTON UPON HU SOUTH YORKSHIRE LINCOLNSHIRE REPORT NO. 604 I I I I I I I • LOCAL GOVERNMENT I BOUNDARY COMMISSION I FOR ENGLAND iI REPORT NO. 604 i i i i i i i i i I I I • LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND I I CHAIRMAN MR G J ELLERTON I MEMBERS MR K F J ENNALS MR G R PRENTICE I MRS H R V SARKANY I MR C W SMITH I PROFESSOR K YOUNG I I I I I I I I I I I CONTENTS The Making of Numberside The Progress of the Humberside Reviews 2.1 The Commission's Initial Review i 2.2 The Secretary of State's Direction 2.3 The Commission's Further Review 2.4 The Commission's Interim Decision 2.5 The Commission's Draft Proposal i 2.6 The Response to the Commission's Draft Proposal i The Commission's Approach to the Further Review and its Consideration of the Case For and Against Change i 3.1 The Criteria for Boundary Changes 3.2 The Wishes of the People 3.3 The Pattern of Community Life 3.4 The Effective Operation of Local Government and i Associated Services i The Commission's Conclusions and Final Proposal 4.1 The Commission's Conclusions 4.2 The Commission's Final Proposal i 4.3 Electoral Consequences 4.4 Second Order Boundary Issues 4.5 Unitary Authorities i 4.6 Publication i i Annexes 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Allocations Document
    East Riding Local Plan 2012 - 2029 Allocations Document PPOCOC--L Adopted July 2016 “Making It Happen” PPOC-EOOC-E Contents Foreword i 1 Introduction 2 2 Locating new development 7 Site Allocations 11 3 Aldbrough 12 4 Anlaby Willerby Kirk Ella 16 5 Beeford 26 6 Beverley 30 7 Bilton 44 8 Brandesburton 45 9 Bridlington 48 10 Bubwith 60 11 Cherry Burton 63 12 Cottingham 65 13 Driffield 77 14 Dunswell 89 15 Easington 92 16 Eastrington 93 17 Elloughton-cum-Brough 95 18 Flamborough 100 19 Gilberdyke/ Newport 103 20 Goole 105 21 Goole, Capitol Park Key Employment Site 116 22 Hedon 119 23 Hedon Haven Key Employment Site 120 24 Hessle 126 25 Hessle, Humber Bridgehead Key Employment Site 133 26 Holme on Spalding Moor 135 27 Hornsea 138 East Riding Local Plan Allocations Document - Adopted July 2016 Contents 28 Howden 146 29 Hutton Cranswick 151 30 Keyingham 155 31 Kilham 157 32 Leconfield 161 33 Leven 163 34 Market Weighton 166 35 Melbourne 172 36 Melton Key Employment Site 174 37 Middleton on the Wolds 178 38 Nafferton 181 39 North Cave 184 40 North Ferriby 186 41 Patrington 190 42 Pocklington 193 43 Preston 202 44 Rawcliffe 205 45 Roos 206 46 Skirlaugh 208 47 Snaith 210 48 South Cave 213 49 Stamford Bridge 216 50 Swanland 219 51 Thorngumbald 223 52 Tickton 224 53 Walkington 225 54 Wawne 228 55 Wetwang 230 56 Wilberfoss 233 East Riding Local Plan Allocations Document - Adopted July 2016 Contents 57 Withernsea 236 58 Woodmansey 240 Appendices 242 Appendix A: Planning Policies to be replaced 242 Appendix B: Existing residential commitments and Local Plan requirement by settlement 243 Glossary of Terms 247 East Riding Local Plan Allocations Document - Adopted July 2016 Contents East Riding Local Plan Allocations Document - Adopted July 2016 Foreword It is the role of the planning system to help make development happen and respond to both the challenges and opportunities within an area.
    [Show full text]
  • Cartogram [1883 WORDS]
    Vol. 6: Dorling/Cartogram/entry Dorling, D. (forthcoming) Cartogram, Chapter in Monmonier, M., Collier, P., Cook, K., Kimerling, J. and Morrison, J. (Eds) Volume 6 of the History of Cartography: Cartography in the Twentieth Century, Chicago: Chicago University Press. [This is a pre-publication Draft, written in 2006, edited in 2009, edited again in 2012] Cartogram A cartogram can be thought of as a map in which at least one aspect of scale, such as distance or area, is deliberately distorted to be proportional to a variable of interest. In this sense, a conventional equal-area map is a type of area cartogram, and the Mercator projection is a cartogram insofar as it portrays land areas in proportion (albeit non-linearly) to their distances from the equator. According to this definition of cartograms, which treats them as a particular group of map projections, all conventional maps could be considered as cartograms. However, few images usually referred to as cartograms look like conventional maps. Many other definitions have been offered for cartograms. The cartography of cartograms during the twentieth century has been so multifaceted that no solid definition could emerge—and multiple meanings of the word continue to evolve. During the first three quarters of that century, it is likely that most people who drew cartograms believed that they were inventing something new, or at least inventing a new variant. This was because maps that were eventually accepted as cartograms did not arise from cartographic orthodoxy but were instead produced mainly by mavericks. Consequently, they were tolerated only in cartographic textbooks, where they were often dismissed as marginal, map-like objects rather than treated as true maps, and occasionally in the popular press, where they appealed to readers’ sense of irony.
    [Show full text]
  • An Age-Period-Cohort Database of Inter-Regional Migration in Australia and Britain, 1976-96
    This is a repository copy of An Age-Period-Cohort Database of Inter-Regional Migration in Australia and Britain, 1976-96. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/5030/ Monograph: Bell, M., Rees, P., Blake, M. et al. (1 more author) (1999) An Age-Period-Cohort Database of Inter-Regional Migration in Australia and Britain, 1976-96. Working Paper. School of Geography , University of Leeds. School of Geography Working Paper 99/02 Reuse Unless indicated otherwise, fulltext items are protected by copyright with all rights reserved. The copyright exception in section 29 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 allows the making of a single copy solely for the purpose of non-commercial research or private study within the limits of fair dealing. The publisher or other rights-holder may allow further reproduction and re-use of this version - refer to the White Rose Research Online record for this item. Where records identify the publisher as the copyright holder, users can verify any specific terms of use on the publisher’s website. Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ WORKING PAPER 99/02 AN AGE-PERIOD-COHORT DATA BASE OF INTER-REGIONAL MIGRATION IN AUSTRALIA AND BRITAIN, 1976-96 Martin Bell1 Philip Rees2 Marcus Blake3 Oliver Duke-Williams4 October 1999 1Department of
    [Show full text]
  • Camera Sites and Speed Limits
    Safety Camera Locations Safer Roads Humber is undertaking speed enforcement at 85 core sites across the region all of which have a history of casualties and collisions. Site conspicuity and visibility at core sites The enforcement vehicle (van or motorcycle), the operator or equipment can be clearly seen by the traffic. Each site is clearly signed with the “Box Brownie” camera sign or blue “Police speed check area” sign. Please note that the guidelines governing the conspicuity of the sites have nothing whatsoever ever to do with a speeding offence and are adhere to only at core safety camera sites. Speed limits All sites are signed in accordance with Government rules and regulations on speed limits. Please be aware that different classifications of vehicles will have to adhere to different speed limits. It is the driver’s responsibility to know what restrictions apply to their vehicle. National speed limits The national speed limit sign is a round white sign with a black diagonal across it. At the current time signs can only be placed at the start of a national speed limit zone. Repeater signs are not required along unlit sections of national speed limit roads. The national speed limit on single carriageway sections is a maximum of 60mph for cars and motorcycles, less for other type of vehicles. The national speed limit on dual carriageway sections is a maximum of 70mph for cars and motorcycles, less for other type of vehicles. 30mph speed limits The 30mph speed limit applies to all traffic on all roads with street lighting unless signs show otherwise.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Government Boundary Commission for England Report No
    Local Government Boundary Commission For England Report No. LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND REPORT NO. LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMKISSION FOR ENGLAND CHAIRMAN Mr G J Ellerton CMC MBE DEPUTY CHAIRMAN Sir Wilfred Bums CB CBE MEMBERS Lady Acknar Mr T Broctbttk DL Mr D P Harrison Professor G E Cherry The Rt. Hon. Tom King Secretary of State for the Environment 1. As a consequence of suggestions which had arisen in the course of the review of their internal parish boundaries, the Boothferry Borough Council, in the non-metropolitan county of Humberside, asked us to carry out a review of parts of their district's boundaries with the District of Beverley (also in Humberside) and with the District of Selby (in the non-metropolitan county of North Yorkshire). The Borough Council sought the following changes: (i) the transfer to the parish of Broomfleet in Boothferry of part of the parish of South Cave in Beverley district: (ii) the transfer of part of the parish of Pollington in Boothferry to the parish of Balne in Selby division. 2. Having obtained the views of all the interested local authorities we considered the Council's requests, as required by Section 48(4) of the Local Government Act 1972. In doing so, we had regard to the guidelines contained.in the Department of the Environment Circular 33/78 and to our own Report No. 287. 3. We noted that the changes were miner, involved very small areas of land and affected a total of two residents. We also noted that with the exception of Humberside County Council, who wished to see no change, the changes were supported by all the local authorities involved.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Bulletin 32.Rtf
    Conservation Bulletin, Issue 32, July 1997 Planning change in London 1 Editorial: a new Government 3 Grant aid offered in 1996/7 4 The future for archaeology 8 Roofs of England 10 Planning and listing directions issued 11 Post-war and thematic listing 12 Long-term planning for Ironbridge Gorge 14 New Chief Executive for EH 16 Perspectives on sustainability 16 The Shimizu case 17 Books and Notes 18,20 Defining archaeological finds 22 Appraising conservation areas 24 (NB: page numbers are those of the original publication) London: planning change in a world city Antoine Grumbach’s design for an inhabited bridge across the Thames was joint winner of the recent ‘Living Bridges’ exhibition at the Royal Academy Tall buildings. New Thames bridges. Better architecture. A new planning policy for London. These four topics were the focus of an English Heritage debate held on 29 May before an invited audience of developers, architects, journalists and policy makers at the Royal College of Physicians. Philip Davies reports ‘London – planning change in a world city’, chaired by the broadcaster and journalist Kirsty Wark, provided a rare opportunity for some of London’s key figures to discuss the future of London and to set out their vision for the capital. The Challenge London faces serious challenges to its distinctive character. Plans for towers of an unprecedented scale and height, and for new and enlarged bridges across the Thames, could change forever the way the city looks and functions. Successive surveys have confirmed that people and businesses are attracted to London not only as the centre of government, communications and financial expertise, but also because it has retained its sense of history and the diversity of its built heritage.
    [Show full text]
  • Ss Ee Cc Tt Oo Rr Ss Tt Uu Dd Yy 11 23 4
    DECEMBER 2001 Black and minority ethnic communities: key data 11 Introduction The study is supplemented by appendices y covering: Awareness of the need for housing associations (HAs) to address the • A comparison of HA lettings to BME inequalities faced by Black and Minority households and Census data in each d Ethnic (BME) households has been English local authority area; heightened by a number of key events in • HAs’ lettings, employment and recent years: governance statistics in relation to BME u communities. • The Housing Corporation’s BME housing t policy, launched in 1998; The appendices should be used by HAs in • The Report of the Lawrence Inquiry in analysing their own performance and will 1999 and its emphasis on the dangers of be updated on an annual basis, including s organisations failing to review practice; 2001 Census data as it becomes available. • The Race Relations Amendment Act s 2000 which places an enforceable duty on the Housing Corporation to promote Data limitations racial equality and prevent racial r discrimination, which it can most The categories used to collect data on BME effectively meet through the work of communities vary between different HAs; sources, causing difficulties in comparing o • The publication of the Challenge Report data. This reflects more than simple in 2001 from the Race and Housing differences in group names. For example, t Inquiry and its emphasis on the need for Irish communities, which are covered by the continuous improvement in HAs’ race Housing Corporation’s BME housing policy, equality work; are classified as ‘white’ rather than BME c • The Housing Corporation’s new groups in many data sources.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Authority District Codes
    UK Data Archive Study Number 6028 - British Household Panel Survey, Waves 1-18, 1991-2009: Conditional Access, Local Authority District Codes British Household Panel Survey, waves 1-18 (1991-2009) User Documentation: Local Authority District Codes (LADISTC) 05 November 2008 For more information contact: Birgitta Rabe [email protected] ++44-1206-874594 Institute for Social and Economic Research University of Essex Wivenhoe Park Colchester Essex CO4 3SQ Local Authority District Codes (wLADISTC) The local authority districts within the database are aggregated if their population falls below 120,000. This aggregation is on the same basis as that for the Census Sample of Anonymised (Individual) Records, and the codes used are the same as those given in Marsh, C. and Teague, A. 'Samples of anonymised records from the 1991 Census', Population Trends, 69, 17-26, 1992. Note that, for wLADISTC, only codes up to 278 are relevant. 1: City; Westminster 53: Newcastle upon Tyne 2: Camden 54: North Tyneside 3: Hackney 55: South Tyneside 4: Hammersmith & Fulham 56: Sunderland 5: Haringey 57: Birmingham 6: Islington 58: Coventry 7: Kensington & Chelsea 59: Dudley 8: Lambeth 60: Sandwell 9: Lewisham 61: Solihull 10: Newham 62: Walsall 11: Southwark 63: Wolverhampton 12: Tower Hamlets 64: Bradford 13: Wandsworth 65: Calderdale 14: Barking and Dagenham 66: Kirklees 15: Barnet 67: Leeds 16: Bexley 68: Wakefield 17: Brent 69: Bath; Kingswood; Wansdyke 18: Bromley 70: Bristol 19: Croydon 71: Northavon 20: Ealing 72: Woodspring 21: Enfield 73: Luton 22: Greenwich
    [Show full text]
  • THE LONDON GAZETTE, 4Ra JULY 1986 8915
    THE LONDON GAZETTE, 4ra JULY 1986 8915 Exemptions in the Order will permit waiting for the (a) The Borough of Goole (Traffic Regulation) Order purpose of: 1948. (a) picking up and setting down passengers ; (b) The County of the West Riding of Yorkshire (b) loading and/or unloading goods; (Boothferry Road and Victoria Street, Goole) (Pro- hibition and Restriction of Waiting) Order 1965. (c) delivering and collecting mail by Post Office vehicles ; (c) The Country of the West Riding of Yorkshire (d) delivering and collecting furniture and effects with (Various Roads at Goole) (Prohibition and Restric- police consent; tion of Waiting) Order 1967. (e) any building or demolition operation, the removal (d) The County of the West Riding of Yorkshire (Stan- of any obstruction to traffic, the maintenance of the hope Street, Goole) (Prohibition of Waiting) Order roads and the supply of gas, electricity and water and 1968. maintenance of any telecommunications apparatus ; (e) The County Council of the West Riding of Yorkshire (f) the fire brigade, ambulance or police services. (Various Roads, Goole) (Restriction of Waiting) Order An exemption in the Order also permits the waiting by disabled persons' vehicles displaying a badge issued under (f) The County Council of the West Riding of York- the local Authority's "orange badge" scheme for a limi- shire (Mariner's Street and Stanhope Street, Goole) ted period of 2 hours, return prohibited within a further (Restriction of Waiting) Order 1970. period of 1 hour. (g) The County Council of the West Riding of York- Full details of these proposals are contained in the shire (Boothferry Road and Dunhill Road, Goole) draft Order which together with a map showing the sides (Restriction of Waiting) Order 1972.
    [Show full text]
  • Candidates Devon & Cornwall Region 1945-2017
    Page | 1 LIBERAL/LIBERAL DEMOCRAT CANDIDATES in the DEVON & CORNWALL REGION 1945-2017 INCLUDING SDP CANDIDATES in the GENERAL ELECTIONS of 1983 and 1987 The compilation of this Index has presented perhaps the least difficulty of all the regions of Britain. The number of constituencies concerned is quite small and many have retained the same name over a long period and are readily identifiable as geographic and historic locations. The Devon & Cornwall Region of course has been traditionally a bastion of Liberal/Liberal Democrat strength, even in the darkest days of party fortunes. Virtually every constituency has been fought consistently over the period. None has been left uncontested for more than two or three elections in succession. Many party MPs held their seats over several General Elections and numerous candidates have stood in the same constituency on multiple occasions. Perhaps in no other region of Britain have so many party candidates been personalities in their own right, a factor which has greatly assisted the business of assembling biographical details. Some have been memorable characters indeed starting with the very first page of the Index. As a result there are several extended entries. Cross-checking of candidates with Indices for other regions has been necessary in a score or so instances. Several candidates have contested parliamentary elections in two or more regions. Page | 2 THE MARTELL PLAN The Martell Plan, mentioned in passing throughout the regional directories was the electoral strategy adopted by the Liberal Party for the General Election of 1950. It was first named after Edward Martell qv (Greater London), a party ‘grandee’ of the immediate post-war years who advocated the nomination of over 150 additional candidates in constituencies which had little or no Liberal organisation nor history of Liberal activity in recent years.
    [Show full text]