SALTGRASS Distichlis Spicata
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Grasses Plant List
Grasses Plant List California Botanical Name Common Name Water Use Native Aristida purpurea purple three-awn Very Low X Arundinaria gigantea cane reed Low Bothriochloa barbinodis cane bluestem Low X Bouteloua curtipendula sideoats grama Low X Bouteloua gracilis, cvs. blue grama Low X Briza media quaking grass Low Calamagrostis x acutiflora cvs., e.g. Karl feather reed grass Low Foerster Cortaderia selloana cvs. pampas grass Low Deschampsia cespitosa, cvs. tufted hairgrass Low X Distichlis spicata (marsh, reveg.) salt grass Very Low X Elymus condensatus, cvs. (Leymus giant wild rye Low X condensatus) Elymus triticoides (Leymus triticoides) creeping wild rye Low X Eragrostis elliottii 'Tallahassee Sunset' Elliott's lovegrass Low Eragrostis spectabilis purple love grass Low Festuca glauca blue fescue Low Festuca idahoensis, cvs. Idaho fescue Low X Festuca mairei Maire's fescue Low Helictotrichon sempervirens, cvs. blue oat grass Low Hordeum brachyantherum Meadow barley Very Low X Koeleria macrantha (cristata) June grass Low X Melica californica oniongrass Very Low X Melica imperfecta coast range onion grass Very Low X Melica torreyana Torrey's melic Very Low X Muhlenbergia capillaris, cvs. hairy awn muhly Low Muhlenbergia dubia pine muhly Low Muhlenbergia filipes purply muhly Low Muhlenbergia lindheimeri Lindheimer muhly Low Muhlenbergia pubescens soft muhly Low Muhlenbergia rigens deer grass Low X Nassella gigantea giant needle grass Low Panicum spp. panic grass Low Panicum virgatum, cvs. switch grass Low Pennisetum alopecuroides, cvs. -
Introductory Grass Identification Workshop University of Houston Coastal Center 23 September 2017
Broadleaf Woodoats (Chasmanthium latifolia) Introductory Grass Identification Workshop University of Houston Coastal Center 23 September 2017 1 Introduction This 5 hour workshop is an introduction to the identification of grasses using hands- on dissection of diverse species found within the Texas middle Gulf Coast region (although most have a distribution well into the state and beyond). By the allotted time period the student should have acquired enough knowledge to identify most grass species in Texas to at least the genus level. For the sake of brevity grass physiology and reproduction will not be discussed. Materials provided: Dried specimens of grass species for each student to dissect Jewelry loupe 30x pocket glass magnifier Battery-powered, flexible USB light Dissecting tweezer and needle Rigid white paper background Handout: - Grass Plant Morphology - Types of Grass Inflorescences - Taxonomic description and habitat of each dissected species. - Key to all grass species of Texas - References - Glossary Itinerary (subject to change) 0900: Introduction and house keeping 0905: Structure of the course 0910: Identification and use of grass dissection tools 0915- 1145: Basic structure of the grass Identification terms Dissection of grass samples 1145 – 1230: Lunch 1230 - 1345: Field trip of area and collection by each student of one fresh grass species to identify back in the classroom. 1345 - 1400: Conclusion and discussion 2 Grass Structure spikelet pedicel inflorescence rachis culm collar internode ------ leaf blade leaf sheath node crown fibrous roots 3 Grass shoot. The above ground structure of the grass. Root. The below ground portion of the main axis of the grass, without leaves, nodes or internodes, and absorbing water and nutrients from the soil. -
Herbaceous Tidal Wetland Communities of Maryland's
HERBACEOUS TIDAL WETLAND COMMUNITIES OF MARYLAND’S EASTERN SHORE 30 June 2001 HERBACEOUS TIDAL WETLAND COMMUNITIES OF MARYLAND’S EASTERN SHORE: Identification, Assessment and Monitoring Report Submitted To: The United States Environmental Protection Agency Clean Water Act 1998 State Wetlands Protection Development Grant Program Report Submitted By: Jason W. Harrison for The Biodiversity Program Maryland Department of Natural Resources Wildlife and Heritage Division 30 June 2001 [U.S. EPA Reference Wetland Natural Communities of Maryland’s Herbaceous Tidal Wetlands Grant # CD993724] Maryland Herbaceous Tidal Wetlands Vegetation Classification / Description and Reference Sites FINAL REPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements.....................................................................................................................3 Introduction.................................................................................................................................5 Purpose .......................................................................................................................................8 Methods ......................................................................................................................................9 Landscape Analysis .........................................................................................................9 Spatial Distribution of Vegetation: Implications for Sampling Design..............................9 Field Surveys.................................................................................................................10 -
Plant Species on Salt-Affected Soil at Cheyenne Bottoms, Kansas
TRANSACTIONS OF THE KANSAS Vol. 109, no. 3/4 ACADEMY OF SCIENCE p. 207-213 (2006) Plant species on salt-affected soil at Cheyenne Bottoms, Kansas TODD A. ASCHENBACH1 AND KELLY KINDSCHER2 1. Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas 66045-2106 ([email protected]) 2. Kansas Biological Survey, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas 66047-3729 ([email protected]). Soil salinity and vegetative cover were investigated at Cheyenne Bottoms Preserve, Kansas in an effort to identify and document the plant species present on naturally occurring salt- and sodium-affected soil. Soil salinity (as indicated by electrical conductivity, ECe) and sodium adsorption ratio (SAR) were measured from nine soil samples collected to a depth of 20 cm in June 1998. Vegetative cover was visually estimated in June and September 1998. A total of 20 plant species were encountered at five soil sampling locations on soils classified as saline, saline-sodic, or sodic. Dominant species observed include Agropyron smithii, Distichlis spicata, Euphorbia geyeri, Poa arida, and Sporobolus airoides. While most species encountered during this study exhibited greater vegetative cover on non-saline soils, all of the dominant species, except A. smithii, exhibited greater cover on salt-affected soil compared to non- saline soil. Comparable salinity levels and species found in areas that have been degraded through oil and gas production activities suggest that the dominant species observed in this study deserve further attention as potential candidates for the restoration of salt-affected areas. Key Words: brine contamination, Cheyenne Bottoms, restoration, saline-sodic, salinity, salt tolerance. INTRODUCTION osmotic stress, ion toxicity or decreased absorption of essential nutrients (Läuchli and Salt-affected soils are commonly found in arid Epstein 1990). -
Bristlecone Chapter of the California Native Plant Society
1 DEDICATED TO THE PRESERVATION OF THE CALIFORNIA NATIVE FLORA The California Native Plant Society Volume 23 No. 5 September/October 2003 NEXT CHAPTER MEETING At our September 24th meeting, Dr. Pamela Muick, Executive Director of the California Native Plant Society, will present a slide talk titled "Quirky California Oaks." She will give an overview of California's oaks, including those on the Sierra eastside, discuss history of human use, restoration and management, and the future of our oak woodlands and forests. Based on her years of experience in oak habitats Pam originated the idea for the book "Oaks of California" which she co-authored. Her book will be available for purchase and signing. The meeting will be held at the Green Church on Hwy #395 at Benton Crossing Road at 7:00 PM. Everyone is invited to a potluck dinner before the meeting at 5:45 PM at the Green Church. Please bring your own table setting and a dish to share. This will be an opportunity for Pam to hear from Bristlecone members what our chapter would like from the various CNPS programs and the state office and ideas about how to strengthen CNPS. Please plan to attend. NEXT CHAPTER BOARD MEETING The next chapter board meeting will be at 7:00 PM on Tuesday, Sept. 16, at Stephen and Karen's residence in Swall Meadows. All are welcome to attend. PRESIDENT'S MESSAGE:. As the nights grow longer and the mornings become colder, many of our local plants are losing their green chlorophyll or dropping their leaves. -
Intra- and Interspecific Variation in Home-Range Size in Sympatric Tuco-Tucos, Ctenomys Australis and C
Journal of Mammalogy, 91(6):1425–1434, 2010 Intra- and interspecific variation in home-range size in sympatric tuco-tucos, Ctenomys australis and C. talarum A. P. CUTRERA,* M. S. MORA,C.D.ANTENUCCI, AND A. I. VASSALLO Laboratorio de Ecofisiologı´a, Departamento de Biologı´a, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cientı´ficas y Te´cnicas (CONICET), C.C. 1245, Mar del Plata, Argentina Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/jmammal/article/91/6/1425/889849 by guest on 29 September 2021 * Correspondent: [email protected] Despite the fundamental nature of the home range to the biology of a species, aspects of its size, shape, and structure are not well defined in certain groups, such as subterranean rodents. These rodents, characterized by limited individual mobility and a patchy distribution of local populations, generally defend multipurpose territories in which breeding and foraging take place, increasing the chances for trade-offs among factors of habitat quality. The present study assessed the home-range size and shape of 2 species of tuco-tucos, Ctenomys australis (300–600 g) and C. talarum (100–180 g), using radiotelemetry in an area where they occur in sympatry, and explored the factors that could influence space use in these subterranean rodents. Home-range size (95% adaptive kernel) of C. australis (1,282.22 6 1,014.83 m2) was ,19-fold larger than that of C. talarum (66.69 6 22.34 m2). The area covered daily by C. australis represented only about 9% of the total home-range size estimated by radiotelemetry in this study and was almost twice as large as that of C. -
2.1 Wildlife Endangered Hand out SC&BI 4.9.20
Endangered & Imperiled Species Documented in Recent Years at the Ballona Wetlands Ecological Reserve Federal Endangered Species List – [E] = Endangered [T] = Threatened ALL PHOTOS SHOWN IN THIS DOCUMENT WERE TAKEN AT BALLONA WETLANDS ECOLOGICAL RESERVE EXCEPT THE PLOVER NESTING IN THE SAND, TAKEN AT DOCKWEILER STATE BEACH & the Great Blue Heron nest, photo taken at nearby Mariners Village 1. Least Bell’s Vireo Vireo bellii pusillus [E] 2. Coastal California Gnatcatcher Polioptila californica californica [T] (resident songbird) nesting - including (migratory songbird) forages and relies on habitat at BWER; documented singing (courtship) on habitat nesting at nearby Playa del Rey Dunes at LAX on north and south levees of Ballona Creek 3. El Segundo Blue Butterfly 4. California Least Tern Sterna antillarum browni [E] (migratory Euphilotes battoides allyni [E] shorebird – migrates from Guatemala and southern Mexico; nests on reproducing in dunes at Ballona Wetlands ER; nearby Venice Beach in specially fenced preserve; feeds on fish in the also reproducing in nearby PDR Dunes shallow water sloughs and in Ballona Creek; mating documented on salt pannes) 5. Western Snowy Plover Charadrius nivosas nivosas [T] nesting at nearby Dockweiler Beach; sheltering at BWER salt panne 6. Light-footed Ridgway’s Rail (Light-footed Clapper Rail) Rallus longirostris levipes – [E] Female for at least last 2 years at freshwater marsh on edge of BWER (land owned by State Lands Commission) 4.9.20 - photos by Jonathan Coffin, Don Sterba List compiled by: Ballona Wetlands Restoration Committee The Voice for Nature on the Los Angeles Coast PAGE 1 State of California Endangered Species List - [E] = Endangered [T] = Threatened 1. -
Wandering Skipper Survey at the San Elijo Lagoon, Encinitas California
Wandering Skipper Survey at Famosa Slough, San Diego, California 27 August 2010 Observers: Keith Greer, Betsy Miller, and Kim Roeland Introduction The wandering skipper (Panoquina errans) is a small butterfly of the family Hesperiidae. It is identifiable by its rich dark brown color and cream-colored spots on the dorsal forewing. The wandering skipper is found only along the coast in southern California, Baja California and northwestern mainland Mexico. Populations have been recorded from Huntington Beach, Upper Newport Bay, and Capistrano Beach (Orsak, 1977). In San Diego, the wandering skipper has been documented in the Tijuana Estuary, San Dieguito Lagoon, and Agua Hedionda lagoon (SanGIS, 2010), but it appears that no extensive survey data have been published. The wandering skipper is on the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species (World Conservation Monitoring Centre, 1996) and is under consideration for possible listing on the endangered species list as a threatened species because of the reduction of salt marsh habitat. The larval host plant for this species, salt grass (Distichlis spicata), is found in transitional habitats along the edge of the high marsh. Nectar sources include Heliotropium spp., Haplopappus spp., and Frankenia salina (Orsak 1977). Potential habitat for the wandering skipper was considered to be areas containing the larval host plant in close proximity to nectar plants. Surveys were completed to determine presence of the wandering skipper in potential habitat areas within Famosa Slough, San Diego, California, both north and south of West Point Loma Blvd. Methods The surveys were conducted on August 27, 2010. The first survey, in high marsh habitat south of W. -
Distribution of the Native Grasses of California
HILGARDIA A Journal of Agricultural Science Published by the California Agricultural Experiment Station VOLUME 17 APRIL, 1947 NUMBER 9 CONTENTS DISTRIBUTION OF THE NATIVE GRASSES OF CALIFORNIA ALAN A. BEETLE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA • BERKELEY, CALIFORNIA HILGARDIA A Journal of Agricultural Science Published by the California Agricultural Experiment Station VOL. 17 APRIL, 1947 NO. 9 DISTRIBUTION OF THE NATIVE GRASSES OF CALIFORNIA1 ALAN A. BEETLE2 THE grasses, supplemented by certain legumes, form the principal basis for range wealth. The natural forage value of the Gramineae as a whole makes an intensive study of their characteristics important, for the broader the knowledge concerning them the more readily may any problem be met. The following paper presents a picture of the current distributions of grasses in California, together with evidences of their floral origins by migration from other regions. Vegetation has many characteristics which are not always apparent at first glance. For instance, certain elements of the vegetation are native in their location, some are native elsewhere and have only recently been introduced. Some are old species often representative of a primitive condition in their genus, still others appear to be recently evolved. Some of the migrants arrived in California from the north during glacial periods, some crossed the ocean, and others came from the south during interglacial periods. Some plants are distributionally restricted for a number of reasons, including: (1) specialization as to habitat or environmental repression, as the species of vernal pools; (2) recent origin (plants sometimes referred to as neoendemics or initiates), as the endemic varieties of Distichlis spicata; (3) ancient origin (paleoendemics or relics); and (4) genotypic specialization (genetic endemics). -
Poaceae: Chloridoideae)
Peterson, P.M., K. Romaschenko, and Y. Herrera Arrieta. 2017. Four new subtribes: Allolepiinae, Jouveinae, Kaliniinae, and Sohnsiinae in the Cynodonteae (Poaceae: Chloridoideae). Phytoneuron 2017-44: 1–9. Published 18 July 2017. ISSN 2153 733 FOUR NEW SUBTRIBES: ALLOLEPIINAE, JOUVEINAE, KALINIINAE, AND SOHNSIINAE IN THE CYNODONTEAE (POACEAE: CHLORIDOIDEAE) PAUL M. PETERSON and KONSTANTIN ROMASCHENKO Department of Botany National Museum of Natural History Smithsonian Institution Washington, DC 20013-7012 [email protected] YOLANDA HERRERA ARRIETA Instituto Politécnico Nacional CIIDIR Unidad Durango-COFAA Durango, C.P. 34220, MÉXICO ABSTRACT Allolepis, Jouvea, Kalina , and Sohnsia are small (only Jouvea contains two species), often overlooked genera that are morphologically and genetically isolated within the tribe Cynodonteae. We present a molecular phylogeny using sequence data from seven plastid markers ( ccsA, ndhA intron, ndhF, rpl32-trnL, rpoC2, rps16-trnK , and rps16 intron) and the nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer regions (ITS 1 & 2). Since Allolepis, Jouvea, Kalinia, and Sohnsia do not align within any of the 21 existing Cynodonteae subtribes, we describe Allolepiinae , Jouveinae , Kaliniinae , and Sohnsiinae as new. In addition, we provide descriptions, habitat, distribution, and comments for each subtribe. Allolepis texana (Vasey) Scribn., Jouvea pilosa (J. Presl) Scribn, J. straminea E. Fourn., and Sohnsia filifolia (E. Fourn.) Airy Shaw are dioecious, caespitose grasses, whereas Kalinia obtusiflora (E. Fourn.) H.L. Bell & Columbus has 4–8 mm wide, sharp-pointed rhizomes and perfect florets. Historically, these western hemisphere grasses were placed in other genera, i.e., Brizopyrum (Presl, 1830; Fournier 1886) , Calamochloa (Fournier 1877), Distichlis (Lamson-Scribner 1899), Eragrostis (Lamson-Scribner 1897) , Poa (Kunth 1833; Vasey 1890b), and Rhachidospermum (Vasey 1890a), until recently being aligned within the Cynodonteae (Columbus 2007; Peterson et al. -
Pollen Limitation of Reproduction in a Native, Wind-Pollinated Prairie Grass
Pollen Limitation of Reproduction in a Native, Wind-Pollinated Prairie Grass Senior Honors Thesis Program in Biological Sciences Northwestern University Maria Wang Advisor: Stuart Wagenius, Chicago Botanic Garden Table of Contents 1. ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................................ 3 2. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................... 4 2.1 Pollen Limitation .................................................................................................................. 4 2.2 Literature Survey: Pollen Limitation in Wind-Pollinated Plants .......................................... 7 2.3 Study Species: Dichanthelium leibergii.............................................................................. 11 2.4 Research Questions ............................................................................................................. 13 3. MATERIALS AND METHODS .............................................................................................. 14 3.1 Study Area and Sampling ................................................................................................... 14 3.2 Pollen Addition and Exclusion Experiment ........................................................................ 14 3.3 Quantifying Density and Maternal Resource Status ........................................................... 16 3.4 Statistical Analyses ............................................................................................................ -
View Full Text Article
Disclaimer Recovery plans delineate reasonable actions that are believed to be required to recover and/or protect listed species. We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, publish recovery plans, sometimes preparing them with the assistance of recovery teams, contractors, State agencies, and others. Objectives will be obtained and any necessary funds made available subject to budgetary and other constraints affecting the parties involved, as well as the need to address other priorities. Recovery plans do not necessarily represent the views or the official positions or approval of any individuals or agencies involved in the plan formulation, other than our own. They represent our official position only after they have been signed by the Director, Regional Director, or California/Nevada Operations Manager as approved. Approved recovery plans are subject to modification as dictated by new findings, changes in species status, and the completion of recovery actions. LITERATURE CITATION SHOULD READ AS FOLLOWS: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2006. Recovery plan for the Carson wandering skipper (Pseudocopaeodes eunus obscurus). U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Sacramento, California. viii + 94 pages. An electronic version of this recovery plan is available at http://www.r1.fws.gov/ecoservices/endangered/recovery/plans.html and http://endangered.fws.gov/recovery/index.html. i Acknowledgments This recovery plan was prepared by Marcy Haworth, Fish and Wildlife Biologist with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, with input from species experts and stakeholders. We gratefully acknowledge the commitment and efforts of the following individuals in the recovery of the Carson wandering skipper. Without their assistance and participation during recovery team meetings, this document would not have been possible.