A New Aromatase Inhibitor, in Postmenopausal Women
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The Effects of Targeted Deletion of the Aromatase Enzyme on Prostatic Contractile Responses to Noradrenaline in Mice
495 The effects of targeted deletion of the aromatase enzyme on prostatic contractile responses to noradrenaline in mice Katherine T Gray, Jennifer L Short, Evan R Simpson1 and Sabatino Ventura Prostate Research Co-operative, Victorian College of Pharmacy, Monash University, 381 Royal Parade, Parkville, Victoria 3052, Australia 1Prince Henry’s Institute of Medical Research, Monash Medical Centre, 246 Clayton Road, Clayton, Victoria 3168, Australia (Correspondence should be addressed to S Ventura; Email: [email protected]) Abstract This investigation aimed to see whether a change in the concentration-dependent contractions. Prazosin (0.3 mM) oestrogen to androgen ratio alters prostate contractility. Isolated attenuated the responses induced by noradrenaline and EFS in organ bath studies using prostates from aromatase knockout all mice (P%0.019, nZ5–7), while cocaine (10 mM) attenuated (ArKO) mice which were homozygous (ArKOK/K)and the responses evoked by tyramine (P!0.001, nZ6). There were heterozygous (ArKOC/K) for the disrupted aromatase cyp19 no genotype differences in EFS- and noradrenaline-induced gene and wild-type littermates (ArKOC/C) were conducted. responses (PR0.506, nZ10–13). Prostates from ArKOK/K The distribution of noradrenergic nerves was visualized using and ArKOC/K mice were more sensitive to tyramine than the sucrose–potassium phosphate–glyoxylic acid method. prostates from ArKOC/C mice (P!0.001, nZ11–13). Dense ArKOK/K mice had increased prostate weights compared adrenergic innervation of the prostate was similar in all mice. with ArKOC/C mice. Frequency–response curves to electrical These results suggest that although the absence of aromatase field stimulation (EFS; 0.5 ms pulse duration, 60 V,0.1–20 Hz) increases prostatic growth, this translates only to a subtle and yielded frequency-dependent contractions, while noradrenaline selective increase in contractility in mature mice. -
(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 8,552,057 B2 Brinton Et Al
US008552057B2 (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 8,552,057 B2 Brinton et al. (45) Date of Patent: *Oct. 8, 2013 (54) PHYTOESTROGENIC FORMULATIONS FOR OTHER PUBLICATIONS ALLEVATION OR PREVENTION OF Morito et al. Interaction of Phytoestrogens with Estrogen Receptors NEURODEGENERATIVE DISEASES a and b (II). Biol. Pharm. Bull. 25(1), pp. 48-52 (2002).* Kinjo et al. Interactions of Phytoestrogens with Estrogen Receptors a (75) Inventors: Roberta Diaz, Brinton, Rancho Palos and b (III). Biol. Pharm. Bull. 27(2) pp. 185-188 (2004).* Verdes, CA (US); Liqin Zhao, Los An, et al., "Estrogen receptor -selective transcriptional activity and Angeles, CA (US) recruitment of coregulators by phytoestrogens', J Biol. Chem. 276(21): 17808-14 (2001). (73) Assignee: University of Southern California, Los Avis, et al. Is there a menopausal syndrome'? Menopausal status and symptoms across racial/ethnic groups', Soc. Sci. Med., 52(3):345-56 Angeles, CA (US) (2001). Brinton, et al. Impact of estrogen therapy on Alzheimer's disease: a (*) Notice: Subject to any disclaimer, the term of this fork in the road?’ CNS Drugs, 18(7):405-422 (2004). patent is extended or adjusted under 35 Bromberger, et al., Psychologic distress and natural menopause: a U.S.C. 154(b) by 0 days. multiethnic community study’. Am. J. Public Health, 91 (9) 1435-42 (2001). This patent is Subject to a terminal dis Brookmeyer, et al., “Projections of Alzheimer's disease in the United claimer. States and the public health impact of delaying disease onset'. Am. J. Public Health, 88(9): 1337-42 (1998). (21) Appl. -
Estrone Sulfate
Available online at www.sciencedirect.com Journal of Steroid Biochemistry & Molecular Biology 109 (2008) 158–167 Estrone sulfate (E1S), a prognosis marker for tumor aggressiveness in prostate cancer (PCa)ଝ Frank Giton a,∗, Alexandre de la Taille b, Yves Allory b, Herve´ Galons c, Francis Vacherot b, Pascale Soyeux b, Claude Clement´ Abbou b, Sylvain Loric b, Olivier Cussenot b, Jean-Pierre Raynaud d, Jean Fiet b a AP-HP CIB INSERM IMRB U841eq07, Henri Mondor, Facult´edeM´edecine, 94010 Cr´eteil, France b INSERM IMRB U841 eq07, CHU Henri Mondor, Facult´edeM´edecine, 94010 Cr´eteil, France c Service de Chimie organique, Facult´e de Pharmacie Paris V, 75006 Paris, France d Universit´e Pierre et Marie Curie, 75252 Paris, France Received 26 December 2006; accepted 26 October 2007 Abstract Seeking insight into the possible role of estrogens in prostate cancer (PCa) evolution, we assayed serum E2, estrone (E1), and estrone sulfate (E1S) in 349 PCa and 100 benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) patients, and in 208 control subjects in the same age range (50–74 years). E1 (pmol/L ± S.D.) and E1S (nmol/L ± S.D.) in the PCa and BPH patients (respectively 126.1 ± 66.1 and 2.82 ± 1.78, and 127.8 ± 56.4 and 2.78 ± 2.12) were significantly higher than in the controls (113.8 ± 47.6 and 2.11 ± 0.96). E2 was not significantly different among the PCa, BPH, and control groups. These assays were also carried out in PCa patients after partition by prognosis (PSA, Gleason score (GS), histological stage, and surgical margins (SM)). -
(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 9,616,072 B2 Birrell (45) Date of Patent: *Apr
USOO961. 6072B2 (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 9,616,072 B2 Birrell (45) Date of Patent: *Apr. 11, 2017 (54) REDUCTION OF SIDE EFFECTS FROM 6,200,593 B1 3, 2001 Place AROMATASE INHIBITORS USED FOR 6,241,529 B1 6, 2001 Place 6,569,896 B2 5/2003 Dalton et al. TREATING BREAST CANCER 6,593,313 B2 7/2003 Place et al. 6,696,432 B1 2/2004 Elliesen et al. (71) Applicant: Chavah Pty Ltd, Medindie, South 6,995,284 B2 2/2006 Dalton et al. Australia (AU) 7,772.433 B2 8, 2010 Dalton et al. 8,003,689 B2 8, 2011 Veverka 8,008,348 B2 8, 2011 Steiner et al. (72) Inventor: Stephen Nigel Birrell, Medindie (AU) 8,980,569 B2 3/2015 Weinberg et al. 8,980,840 B2 3/2015 Truitt, III et al. (73) Assignee: CHAVAH PTY LTD., Stirling, South 9,150,501 B2 10/2015 Dalton et al. Australia (AU) 2003/0O87885 A1 5/2003 Masini-Eteve et al. 2004/O191311 A1 9/2004 Liang et al. *) Notice: Subject to anyy disclaimer, the term of this 2005/OO32750 A1 2/2005 Steiner et al. 2005/0176692 A1 8/2005 Amory et al. patent is extended or adjusted under 35 2005/0233970 A1 10/2005 Garnick U.S.C. 154(b) by 0 days. 2006, OO69067 A1 3/2006 Bhatnagar et al. 2007/0066568 A1 3/2007 Dalton et al. This patent is Subject to a terminal dis 2009,0264534 A1 10/2009 Dalton et al. claimer. 2010, O144687 A1 6, 2010 Glaser 2014, OO18433 A1 1/2014 Dalton et al. -
Aromatase and Its Inhibitors: Significance for Breast Cancer Therapy † EVAN R
Aromatase and Its Inhibitors: Significance for Breast Cancer Therapy † EVAN R. SIMPSON* AND MITCH DOWSETT *Prince Henry’s Institute of Medical Research, Monash Medical Centre, Clayton, Victoria 3168, Australia; †Department of Biochemistry, Royal Marsden Hospital, London SW3 6JJ, United Kingdom ABSTRACT Endocrine adjuvant therapy for breast cancer in recent years has focussed primarily on the use of tamoxifen to inhibit the action of estrogen in the breast. The use of aromatase inhibitors has found much less favor due to poor efficacy and unsustainable side effects. Now, however, the situation is changing rapidly with the introduction of the so-called phase III inhibitors, which display high affinity and specificity towards aromatase. These compounds have been tested in a number of clinical settings and, almost without exception, are proving to be more effective than tamoxifen. They are being approved as first-line therapy for elderly women with advanced disease. In the future, they may well be used not only to treat young, postmenopausal women with early-onset disease but also in the chemoprevention setting. However, since these compounds inhibit the catalytic activity of aromatase, in principle, they will inhibit estrogen biosynthesis in every tissue location of aromatase, leading to fears of bone loss and possibly loss of cognitive function in these younger women. The concept of tissue-specific inhibition of aromatase expression is made possible by the fact that, in postmenopausal women when the ovaries cease to produce estrogen, estrogen functions primarily as a local paracrine and intracrine factor. Furthermore, due to the unique organization of tissue-specific promoters, regulation in each tissue site of expression is controlled by a unique set of regulatory factors. -
Testosterone, DHP, Progesterone, Es
UC Davis Clinical Endocrinology Laboratory Volume Required: Testosterone: 2 mL serum AMH equine: 1 ml serum Estrone Sulfate, Progesterone: 1 mL serum each. Inhibin: 1 ml serum, sent overnight on ice. AMH Canine/Feline Spaychek: 200 µL serum, fasted, 30 days post- surgery. Send 0.5 ml for Progesterone/AMH and 2 ml for testosterone/AMH. Cryptorchid Panel: 2 mL serum Pregnancy Panel: 2 mL serum Granulosa Cell Tumor Panel: 3 mL serum Sample Handling and Shipment Requirements: PLEASE SEND SERUM ONLY, no whole or clotted blood. Blood contains active enzymes which may affect the results. The use of serum separator tubes is not recommended; they may degrade the analytes, particularly progesterone and AMH, and may invalidate results. Draw in a tube with no additive (red top). If you do use a serum separator tube, transfer the serum to a new tube as soon as possible. For AMH and inhibin testing: Please separate the serum and ship priority overnight on an ice pack. Store the sample in the freezer if shipping will be delayed, but you may ship it on an ice pack, dry ice is not required. Do not ship the sample via the US Postal Service, as the delivery will be delayed in the campus mailroom for up to a week, causing sample degradation. Do not ship the samples to arrive on a holiday or a weekend, as UPS and Fed Ex will not deliver it to us, and it will sit at the shipping facility, causing sample degradation. Please check our site for university holidays. For steroid hormone (testosterone, DHP, progesterone, estrone) testing: These hormones are more stable; however, they may be degraded by poor handling conditions, and shipment as whole or clotted blood. -
INTERRELATIONSHIPS of the ESTROGEN-PRODUCING ENZYMES NETWORK in BREAST CANCER DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment Of
INTERRELATIONSHIPS OF THE ESTROGEN-PRODUCING ENZYMES NETWORK IN BREAST CANCER DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Wendy L. Rich, M.S. ∗∗∗∗∗ The Ohio State University 2009 Dissertation Committee: Approved by Pui-Kai Li, Ph.D., Adviser Robert W. Brueggemeier, Ph.D. Karl A. Werbovetz, Ph.D. Adviser Graduate Program in Pharmacy Charles L. Shapiro M.D. ABSTRACT In the United States, breast cancer is the most common non-skin malignancy and the second leading cause of cancer-related death in women. However, earlier detection and new, more effective treatments may be responsible for the decrease in overall death rates. Approximately 60% of breast tumors are estrogen receptor (ER) positive and thus their cellular growth is hormone-dependent. Elevated levels of estrogens, even in post- menopausal women, have been implicated in the development and progression of hormone-dependent breast cancer. Hormone therapies seek to inhibit local estrogen action and biosynthesis, which can be produced by pathways utilizing the enzymes aromatase or steroid sulfatase (STS). Cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2), typically involved in inflammation processes, is a major regulator of aromatase expression in breast cancer cells. STS, COX-2, and aromatase are critical for estrogen biosynthesis and have been shown to be over-expressed in breast cancer. While there continues to be extensive study and successful design of potent aromatase inhibitors, much remains unclear about the regulation of STS and the clinical applications for its selective inhibition. Further studies exploring the relationships of STS with COX-2 and aromatase enzymes will aid in the understanding of its role in cancer cell growth and in the development of future hormone- dependent breast cancer therapies. -
Aromtase Inhibitors in Breast Cancer
한국유방암학회지:제5권 제4호 Aromtase Inhibitors in Breast Cancer Department of Surgery, Gachon Medical School, Incheon, Korea Woo-Shin Shim, M.D. INTRODUCTION gressions and to be associated with minimal side effects and toxicity. The second strategy, blockade of estradiol biosyn- Breast cancer is now the second most cancer in women after thesis, was demonstrated to be feasible using the steroido- stomach cancer in Korea, and is increasing continuously. In the genesis inhibitor, aminoglutethimide, which produced tumor year 2000, the crude incidence of breast cancer in Korea was regressions equivalent to those observed with tamoxifen.(3) estimated about 23 per 100,000 people.(1) However, side effects from aminoglutethimide were consid- For the process of inducing breast cancer, estrogens appear erable and its effects on several steroidogenic enzymes required to play a predominant role. These sex steroids are believed to concomitant use of a glucocorticoid. Consequently, tamoxifen initiate and to promote the process of the breast carcinogenesis became the preferred, first line endocrine agent with which to by enhancing the rate of cell division and reducing time treat ER-positive advanced breast cancer. However, the clinical available for DNA repair. A new concept is that estrogens can efficacy of aminoglutethimide focused attention upon the need be metabolized to catechol-estrogens and then to quinines that to develop more potent, better tolerated, and more specific directly damage DNA. These two process-- estrogen receptor inhibitors of estrogen biosynthesis. mediated, genomic effects on proliferation and receptor independent, genotoxic effects of estrogen metabolites-- can act INHIBITION OF ESTRADIOL BIOSYNTHESIS in an additive or synergistic fashion to cause breast cancer.(2) Breast cancers that arise in patients can be divided into Multiple enzymatic steps are involved in the biosynthesis of hormone dependent and hormone independent subtypes.(3) The estradiol and could potentially be used as targets for inhibition. -
Use of Aromatase Inhibitors in Breast Carcinoma
Endocrine-Related Cancer (1999) 6 75-92 Use of aromatase inhibitors in breast carcinoma R J Santen and H A Harvey1 Department of Medicine, University of Virginia Health Sciences Center, Charlottesville, Virginia 22908, USA 1Department of Medicine, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania 17033, USA (Requests for offprints should be addressed to R J Santen) Abstract Aromatase, a cytochrome P-450 enzyme that catalyzes the conversion of androgens to estrogens, is the major mechanism of estrogen synthesis in the post-menopausal woman. We review some of the recent scientific advances which shed light on the biologic significance, physiology, expression and regulation of aromatase in breast tissue. Inhibition of aromatase, the terminal step in estrogen biosynthesis, provides a way of treating hormone-dependent breast cancer in older patients. Aminoglutethimide was the first widely used aromatase inhibitor but had several clinical drawbacks. Newer agents are considerably more selective, more potent, less toxic and easier to use in the clinical setting. This article reviews the clinical data supporting the use of the potent, oral competitive aromatase inhibitors anastrozole, letrozole and vorozole and the irreversible inhibitors 4-OH andro- stenedione and exemestane. The more potent compounds inhibit both peripheral and intra-tumoral aromatase. We discuss the evidence supporting the notion that aromatase inhibitors lack cross- resistance with antiestrogens and suggest that the newer, more potent compounds may have a particular application in breast cancer treatment in a setting of adaptive hypersensitivity to estrogens. Currently available aromatase inhibitors are safe and effective in the management of hormone- dependent breast cancer in post-menopausal women failing antiestrogen therapy and should now be used before progestational agents. -
Delaying and Reversing Frailty: a Systematic Review of Primary Care Interventions
Research John Travers, Roman Romero-Ortuno, Jade Bailey and Marie-Therese Cooney Delaying and reversing frailty: a systematic review of primary care interventions INTRODUCTION Abstract Frailty has been described as the most Frailty has long been in the lexicon of problematic expression of population ageing Background everyday language. ‘How easily the wind in the context of this considerable growth.3 It Recommendations for routine frailty screening overturns a frail tree’, Buddha reflected has forced fundamental changes in national in general practice are increasing as frailty 1 prevalence grows. In England, frailty identification some 2500 years ago. From such historic health policies. For example, since 2017 became a contractual requirement in 2017. prevalence has come an inherited instinct the new General Medical Services (GMS) However, there is little guidance on the most for recognising frailty. However, it is only contract in England mandates that all effective and practical interventions once frailty primary care practices use an appropriate has been identified. in recent years that frailty has come into focus for more rigorous medical definition tool to identify patients aged ≥65 years who Aim in a shift of emphasis from single-system are living with moderate or severe frailty. To assess the comparative effectiveness and ease of implementation of frailty interventions in conditions to unifying constructs for holistic For patients living with severe frailty, the primary care. patient care. practice must undertake a clinical review, Frailty can be described as a state of provide an annual medication review, Design and setting A systematic review of frailty interventions in physiological vulnerability with diminished discuss whether the patient has fallen in primary care. -
Mutagens and Reproductive Toxins Chemical Class Standard Operating Procedure
1 Mutagens and Reproductive Toxins Chemical Class Standard Operating Procedure Mutagens and Reproductive Toxins H340 H341 H360 H361 H362 This SOP is not a substitute for hands-on training. Print a copy and insert into your laboratory SOP binder. Department: Chemistry Date SOP was written: Thursday, July 1, 2021 Date SOP was approved by PI/lab supervisor: Thursday, July 1, 2021 Name: F. Fischer Principal Investigator: Signature: ______________________________ Name: Matthew Rollings Internal Lab Safety Coordinator or Lab Manager: Lab Phone: 510.301.1058 Office Phone: 510.643.7205 Name: Felix Fischer Emergency Contact: Phone Number: 510.643.7205 Tan Hall 674, 675, 676, 679, 680, 683, 684 Location(s) covered by this SOP: Hildebrand Hall: D61, D32 1. Purpose This SOP covers the precautions and safe handling procedures for the use of Mutagens and Reproductive Toxins. For a list of Mutagens and Reproductive Toxins covered by this SOP and their use(s), see the “List of Chemicals”. Procedures described in Section 12 apply to all materials covered in this SOP. A change to the “List of Chemicals” does not constitute a change in the SOP requiring review or retraining. If you have questions concerning the applicability of any recommendation or requirement listed in this procedure, contact the Principal Investigator/Laboratory Supervisor or the campus Chemical Hygiene Officer at [email protected]. 2. Physical & Chemical Properties/Definition of Chemical Group Germ Cell Mutagenicity is a hazard class that is primarily concerned with chemicals that may cause mutations in the germ cell of humans that can be transmitted to the progeny. Rev. -
Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 80 / Wednesday, April 26, 1995 / Notices DIX to the HTSUS—Continued
20558 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 80 / Wednesday, April 26, 1995 / Notices DEPARMENT OF THE TREASURY Services, U.S. Customs Service, 1301 TABLE 1.ÐPHARMACEUTICAL APPEN- Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DIX TO THE HTSUSÐContinued Customs Service D.C. 20229 at (202) 927±1060. CAS No. Pharmaceutical [T.D. 95±33] Dated: April 14, 1995. 52±78±8 ..................... NORETHANDROLONE. A. W. Tennant, 52±86±8 ..................... HALOPERIDOL. Pharmaceutical Tables 1 and 3 of the Director, Office of Laboratories and Scientific 52±88±0 ..................... ATROPINE METHONITRATE. HTSUS 52±90±4 ..................... CYSTEINE. Services. 53±03±2 ..................... PREDNISONE. 53±06±5 ..................... CORTISONE. AGENCY: Customs Service, Department TABLE 1.ÐPHARMACEUTICAL 53±10±1 ..................... HYDROXYDIONE SODIUM SUCCI- of the Treasury. NATE. APPENDIX TO THE HTSUS 53±16±7 ..................... ESTRONE. ACTION: Listing of the products found in 53±18±9 ..................... BIETASERPINE. Table 1 and Table 3 of the CAS No. Pharmaceutical 53±19±0 ..................... MITOTANE. 53±31±6 ..................... MEDIBAZINE. Pharmaceutical Appendix to the N/A ............................. ACTAGARDIN. 53±33±8 ..................... PARAMETHASONE. Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the N/A ............................. ARDACIN. 53±34±9 ..................... FLUPREDNISOLONE. N/A ............................. BICIROMAB. 53±39±4 ..................... OXANDROLONE. United States of America in Chemical N/A ............................. CELUCLORAL. 53±43±0