DOCSLIB.ORG

Product Manager Excalibur Product Manager Mortars Systems

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Product Manager Excalibur Product Manager Mortars Systems M1117 armored security vehicle tar weapon systems include the 60 mm, 81 mm and 120 mm mortars and related equipment. Fire-control systems, used to calculate mortar missions, include new, improved systems like the mortar fire-con- trol system-heavy (MFCS-H) and the light- weight handheld mortar ballistic com- puter (LHMBC). The M224 60 mm mortar weapon sys- tem is a lightweight, high-angle-of-fire, smooth-bore, manportable, muzzle-loaded mortar with improved rate-of-fire capabili- ties. The M224 consists of the following components: M225 cannon (tube), M170 bipod assembly, M7 baseplate, M8 auxil- tillery combat observation lasing teams Product Manager Excalibur iary baseplate and the M64A1 sight unit. (COLTs) in both heavy and Infantry brigade The Product Manager Excalibur (PM Ex- The M224 fires the complete family of 60 combat teams, the Armored Knight will calibur) is developing Excalibur, a preci- mm ammunition, such as high explosive, combine the proven armored security vehi- sion, autonomously guided, long-range ar- smoke, illumination, infrared illumination cle with the M707 Knight mission equip- tillery system. and practice cartridges. With ranges from ment package. The XM982 Excalibur is a 155 mm preci- 70 meters to 3,500 meters, the M224 meets The resultant M1200 Armored Knight sion-guided artillery round with extended lethality, range and weight requirements will provide COLTs with increased armor range. Already being fielded to warfight- for light forces without an additional trans- protection, payload and agility. Textron ers and successfully employed in combat portation requirement. Marine and Land Systems is presently un- operations, Excalibur uses GPS precision- The M252 81 mm mortar system is a der contract with the U.S. Army for 107 guidance technology to provide accurate, smooth-bore, muzzle-loaded weapon that modified ASVs to be used as the base vehi- first round fire-for-effect capability in an replaced the M29A1 mortar. It features a cle for the M1200 Armored Knight produc- urban setting. high-rate-of-fire, extended range, improved tion. Excalibur is approximately 1 meter in lethality and improved overall system char- length and weighs 106 pounds. Its 40-kilo- acteristics. The entire family of 81 mm am- AMMUNITION meter range and high accuracy result in in- munition can be fired by the M252. The creased lethality through a decrease in re- M252 consists of the following components: The Program Executive Office for Am- quired volume of fire per engagement. M253 cannon (tube), M177 bipod, M3A1 munition (PEO Ammo) has the mission to Excalibur 1b is currently in competitive baseplate and the M64A1 sight unit. develop and procure conventional leap- development and testing. The M120/M121 120 mm Battalion Mor- ahead munitions to increase combat power tar System is a smooth-bore, muzzle-load- to warfighters. Project managers within Product Manager Mortars Systems ed, high-angle-of-fire weapon that re- the PEO include: Combat Ammunition The Product Manager Mortars Systems placed the M30 4.2-inch mortar, providing Systems, Close Combat Systems Maneu- (PM Mortars) is responsible for weapon increased range, lethality, illumination and ver Ammunition Systems and Joint Ser- and fire-control systems and for the devel- smoke screening effectiveness over the vices. opment of the precision-guided mortar previous system. It consists of the M298 Project Manager Combat Ammunition munition (PGMM), a new precision mortar barrel assembly, M190/M191 bipod assem- Systems (PM CAS), for example, is respon- round currently under development. Mor- bly, the M9 baseplate and the M67 sight. sible for equipping soldiers with all tube- launched, indirect-fire munitions and mor- tar weapons systems for the Army’s cur- rent, Stryker and Future Forces. Under the Single Manager for Conventional Ammuni- tion (SMCA) responsibilities, PM CAS pro- cures ammunition for other services. The PM does this through life-cycle program management of artillery and mortar prod- Soldiers carry an ucts in precision-guided munitions, smart Excalibur round. munitions, conventional munitions, mor- tar weapons systems, mortar fire-control systems and fuzes/fuze setters. Organizations within PM CAS include Product Manager Excalibur, Product Man- ager Mortars Systems, the Conventional Ammunition Division and the Business Management Division. October 2009 I ARMY 371 The 120 mm battalion mortar system pro- Both 120 mm mortar system configura- pressures generated during firing. vides close-in and continuous indirect-fire tions use graphic scales, M16 and M19 The M313 consists of an 81 mm mortar support to maneuver forces and can rap- plotting boards, firing tables and the M23 tube similar to the current M253 tube, a idly respond to threats. The battalion mor- mortar ballistic computer. The system is spacer and a mock 120 mm tube which al- tar platoon must move frequently to avoid compatible with the M2 aiming circle, M45 lows access to the 81 mm tube’s firing pin. counterfire and maintain continuous fire series boresight equipment, M14 aiming The system uses the breech cap from the support to advancing friendly forces. posts and the M58/59 aiming post lights. tactical 120 mm tube to provide more real- This mortar system has been fielded for The mortar fire-control system is currently ism in training. use in mechanized infantry, armor and cav- being fielded (see below), which will The M313 retains all the performance alry units with the M1064A3 tracked mor- vastly improve all fire-control aspects of characteristics of the M253 81 mm mortar tar carrier (M121). Light units use a towed the system. tube used with the M252 mortar system. version of the mortar, which is transported The XM326 Stowage Kit (Quick Stow) The M313 is approximately half the cost of by the M1101 trailer (M120), and will is a 120 mm mortar improvement. The the M253, weighs 4.5 pounds less, and in- mount on the QuickStowTM device for powered device will allow a 120 mm mor- corporates an internal blast attenuation easy emplacement and displacement. tar to be carried as a single unit. The device device, reducing the number of parts and The M120 towed system consists of the uses a mortar support strut to hold the simplifying maintenance and operation. following components: M298 cannon mortar tube, base plate and bipod solidly Other recent government and industry de- (tube), M190 bipod, M9 baseplate and the together. This assembly is emplaced or re- velopment efforts have focused on preci- M67 sight unit. The M120, when trans- covered by a hydraulic driven winch. A sion guidance and extended range op- ported on the M1100 trailer, is primarily manual lift winch and strap are also avail- tions. towed by a high-mobility, multipurpose able for use as a manual backup. Once the The M95/M96 Mortar Fire-Control Sys- wheeled vehicle (Humvee). 120 mm mortar is emplaced, the support tem (MFCS) is a revolutionary improve- The M121 carrier-mounted mortar sys- strut is disengaged and the hauling plat- ment in mortar fire-control capability, link- tem consists of the M298 cannon, M9 base- form is moved before mortar firing begins. ing mortar fires with the digital battlefield. plate (for ground mount mode), M191 bi- The M313 Training Insert is a subcaliber MFCS provides digital fire-control capabil- pod, an adapter kit for mounting in the insert used to reduce the life-cycle training ity for mortar carrier vehicles. It also pro- M1064A3 and the M67 sight unit with an costs of the M120/M121 battalion mortar vides digital connectivity with AFATDS, 3 extension assembly. The turntable pro- system by approximately $33 million per mil azimuth and 1 mil elevation pointing vides a 90-degree area of fire. The adapta- year. The M313 will replace the M303 in- accuracy, no crew dismount and ballistic tion kit has a breech piece socket, bipod sert. The M313 is capable of firing the 300 calculations within 10 seconds. MFCS support, travel clamp assembly, step as- series and newer 800 series 81 mm ammu- combines a highly accurate weapon point- sembly and brackets to mount the mortar nition. The M303 is restricted from firing ing device, an inertial navigation/position into the M1064A3. the 800 series ammunition due to higher system and a digital communications ca- pability embedded in the fire-control com- puter to create a highly responsive and ac- curate fire-control system. The system al- lows mortar crews to send and receive digital call-for-fire messages, determine the pointing and position of the weapon, and calculate ballistic solutions. The mor- tar fire-control system is made up of the following hardware that is ruggedized for use in combat, in all types of weather, and in military vehicles: pointing device (TALIN Datasheet), commander’s inter- face, gunner’s display, driver’s display, GPS PLGR, power distribution assembly and cables. Mortar fire-control system ca- pabilities provide significant enhance- M136 AT4 light ments in survivability, accuracy and re- antiarmor weapon sponsiveness, while providing a link to other digital fire-control network assets. Most notably, since the system can receive a fire mission on the move, MFCS allows mortars to stop, fire and move in less than one minute—down from the current 8/12 minute (day/night) standard. A mortar section can utilize split operations without a crew dismount, allowing for dispersed operations. Accuracy of the mortar is also increased by a factor of three. All of these advantages increase the survivability and responsiveness for mortars on the future battlefield. A planned improvement for the MFCS is the XM150 Dismounted Mortar System. service Marine Corps/Army system that Networked Munitions, Force Application, The XM150 dismounted mortar system is calculates the ballistic solution for the en- Special Projects and Shoulder Launched similar to the M95 120 mm, M121 carrier tire family of fielded U.S.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Department of Homeland Security Appropriations for Fiscal Year 2008
    S. HRG. 110–36 DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY APPROPRIATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2008 HEARINGS BEFORE A SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED TENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION Department of Homeland Security Nondepartmental witnesses Printed for the use of the Committee on Appropriations ( Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.gpoaccess.gov/congress/index.html U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 33–920 PDF WASHINGTON : 2007 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2250 Mail: Stop SSOP, Washington, DC 20402–0001 COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS ROBERT C. BYRD, West Virginia, Chairman DANIEL K. INOUYE, Hawaii THAD COCHRAN, Mississippi PATRICK J. LEAHY, Vermont TED STEVENS, Alaska TOM HARKIN, Iowa ARLEN SPECTER, Pennsylvania BARBARA A. MIKULSKI, Maryland PETE V. DOMENICI, New Mexico HERB KOHL, Wisconsin CHRISTOPHER S. BOND, Missouri PATTY MURRAY, Washington MITCH MCCONNELL, Kentucky BYRON L. DORGAN, North Dakota RICHARD C. SHELBY, Alabama DIANNE FEINSTEIN, California JUDD GREGG, New Hampshire RICHARD J. DURBIN, Illinois ROBERT F. BENNETT, Utah TIM JOHNSON, South Dakota LARRY CRAIG, Idaho MARY L. LANDRIEU, Louisiana KAY BAILEY HUTCHISON, Texas JACK REED, Rhode Island SAM BROWNBACK, Kansas FRANK R. LAUTENBERG, New Jersey WAYNE ALLARD, Colorado BEN NELSON, Nebraska LAMAR ALEXANDER, Tennessee TERRENCE E. SAUVAIN, Staff Director BRUCE EVANS, Minority Staff Director SUBCOMMITTEE ON THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY ROBERT C. BYRD, West Virginia, Chairman DANIEL K. INOUYE, Hawaii THAD COCHRAN, Mississippi PATRICK J. LEAHY, Vermont JUDD GREGG, New Hampshire BARBARA A. MIKULSKI, Maryland TED STEVENS, Alaska HERB KOHL, Wisconsin ARLEN SPECTER, Pennsylvania PATTY MURRAY, Washington PETE V.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Training Cata
    Training for the Military HIGH MOBILITY MULTIPURPOSE WHEELED VEHICLE 0665 FIELD SERVICE AND MILITARY TRAINING COURSE CATALOG Aftermarket Fulfillment and Training Center (AFTC) 5448 Dylan Drive, South Bend, Indiana 46628 Contents General Information 4 Student Registration 5 Payment Information 5 Advanced Mobility / Maintenance / BDAR 6 Field Maintenance Training 8 Sustainment Maintenance Training 10 4L80E Transmission Maintenance Training 12 “ Whether it is ‘training readiness,,’’ combat operations, Air Conditioning Systems Maintenance 14 oror domesticdomestic response to floods and other natural disasters, itit isis thethe soldiersoldier inin hishis oror herher HumveeHumvee thatthat AmeriAmerica sees Alternator / Starter / Electrical Systems Maintenance 16 ccoming to their aide.” —Major—Major GeneGenerral Courtneeyy CarCarrr,, IIndiana Naationaltional GuaGuarrd Diesel Fuel Injection Pump Maintenance Training 17 Visitor Information 18 2 3 2 Our program development experience has been Training gained throtugh the development of training on a myriad of equipment from the Humvee through Program various tactical bridging equipment, such as the Improved Ribbon Bridge, the Rapidly Emplaced Bridge Development System, all of the MK II series Bridge Erection Boats, as well as MRAP, LTAS Wrecker, water purification and AM General’s Military Training Department fuel distribution systems. is a TRADOC certified world leader in All of our training programs are written to comply with training program development. TRADOC Regulation 350-70. Our expert program writers and Military Training Department Staff graphic llustrators are highly trained, AM General’s Training Department provides and credentialed professionals. professional training programs at all military skill (echelon) levels for Army systems used in the military inventory. Our technical writers and program to develop professional programs of instruction (POI).
    [Show full text]
  • Guided Mortar Systems APRIL 2015
    Guided Mortar Systems APRIL 2015 • uided mortar systems are guided mortars from other types of artillery. Finally, NUMBER 51 NUMBER 51 weapons intended to provide increased the increased accuracy of guided mortar sys- Gfiring accuracy and reduced ammu- tems has increased the utility of the mortar as nition consumption over their conventional an anti-tank weapon, allowing for the more counterparts. Mortars typically fire projec- accurate engagement of moving targets. The tiles intended for use against personnel, light advantages of guided mortar systems have armoured vehicles, and structures. They are made them increasingly popular weapons and normally smooth-bore, muzzle-loading, indirect- they are now in service with several militaries fire support weapons that allow the operators around the world.3 to engage targets that may not be within their Guided mortar systems first entered line of sight. Conventional mortars do not have development more than thirty years ago. WEAPONS WEAPONS & MARKETS recoil mechanisms, with the main recoil force Early attempts to develop guided mortar sys- being transmitted directly to the ground via tems were limited by the comparatively small the baseplate. Additionally, most mortars are size of mortar projectiles and fuzes compared restricted in elevation, only capable of firing to larger guided missiles and guided artillery at high-angle trajectories (above 45°), meaning projectiles. Advances in microelectronics have that they cannot be used in the direct-fire sup- allowed for the development of effective guid- port role (Ryan, 1982).1 Mortars are limited in ance packages and fuze assemblies within the range and accuracy when compared to many size constraints of mortar projectiles (Weber, other artillery systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Standards in Weapons Training (Special Operations Forces)
    Department of the Army Pamphlet 350–39 Training Standards in Weapons Training (Special Operations Forces) Headquarters Department of the Army Washington, DC 3 July 1997 UNCLASSIFIED SUMMARY of CHANGE DA PAM 350–39 Standards in Weapons Training (Special Operations Forces) This revision-- o Deletes requirements for M72A2 light antitank weapon (LAW) (Chap 2). o Deletes requirements for ranger antiarmor-antipersonnel weapon system (RAAWS) (Chap 2). o Deletes requirements for Stinger crews (Chap 2). o Deletes requirements for mine warfare (Chap 2). o Deletes requirements for MGXX warfare (Chap 2). o Deletes requirements for CAR15 warfare (Chap 2). o Deletes requirements for Combat Training Center (CTC) (Chap 2). o Adds requirements for rocket propelled grenades (RPG) (Chap 3). o Adds requirements for close-quarters combat (CQC) (Chap 3). o Adds requirements for recoilless rifles (RCRL) 84-mm and 90-mm (Chap 3). o Adds requirements for Stinger crews (Chap 3). o Adds requirements for mortars 107-mm (Chap 3). Headquarters *Department of the Army Department of the Army Pamphlet 350–39 Washington, DC 3 July 1997 Training Standards in Weapons Training (Special Operations Forces) procedures for planning, resourcing, and exe- of Staff for Operations and Plans may dele- cuting training. It includes weapons qualifica- gate this authority, in writing, to a division tion standards, suggested training programs, chief within the proponent agency or a field and ammunition requirements for the attain- operating agency in the grade of colonel or ment and sustainment of weapons proficien- the civilian equivalent. c y . T h e p r o g r a m s i n c o r p o r a t e t r a i n i n g devices and simulators.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Robotic Systems to Carry out Traverse Execution, Opportunistic Science, and Landing Site Evaluation Tasks
    NASA/TM-2011-216157 Evaluation of Robotic Systems to Carry Out Traverse Execution, Opportunistic Science, and Landing Site Evaluation Tasks Stephen J. Hoffman, PhD1, Matthew J. Leonard2, Pascal Lee, PhD3 1Science Applications International Corporation, Houston 2NASA Johnson Space Center, Houston 3Mars Institute, SETI Institute, Moffett Field, California National Aeronautics and Space Administration Johnson Space Center Houston, TX 77058 September 2011 THE NASA STI PROGRAM OFFICE . IN PROFILE Since its founding, NASA has been dedicated to • CONFERENCE PUBLICATION. Collected the advancement of aeronautics and space papers from scientific and technical science. The NASA Scientific and Technical conferences, symposia, seminars, or other Information (STI) Program Office plays a key meetings sponsored or cosponsored by part in helping NASA maintain this important NASA. role. • SPECIAL PUBLICATION. Scientific, technical, or historical information from The NASA STI Program Office is operated by NASA programs, projects, and mission, Langley Research Center, the lead center for often concerned with subjects having NASA’s scientific and technical information. substantial public interest. The NASA STI Program Office provides access to the NASA STI Database, the largest • TECHNICAL TRANSLATION English- collection of aeronautical and space science STI language translations of foreign scientific in the world. The Program Office is also and technical material pertinent to NASA’s NASA’s institutional mechanism for mission. disseminating the results of its research and Specialized services that complement the STI development activities. These results are Program Office’s diverse offerings include published by NASA in the NASA STI Report creating custom thesauri, building customized Series, which includes the following report databases, organizing and publishing research types: results .
    [Show full text]
  • Military Guide to Terrorism in the Twenty-First Century
    US Army TRADOC TRADOC G2 Handbook No. 1 AA MilitaryMilitary GuideGuide toto TerrorismTerrorism in the Twenty-First Century US Army Training and Doctrine Command TRADOC G2 TRADOC Intelligence Support Activity - Threats Fort Leavenworth, Kansas 15 August 2007 DISTRIBUTION RESTRICTION: Approved for Public Release; Distribution Unlimited. 1 Summary of Change U.S. Army TRADOC G2 Handbook No. 1 (Version 5.0) A Military Guide to Terrorism in the Twenty-First Century Specifically, this handbook dated 15 August 2007 • Provides an information update since the DCSINT Handbook No. 1, A Military Guide to Terrorism in the Twenty-First Century, publication dated 10 August 2006 (Version 4.0). • References the U.S. Department of State, Office of the Coordinator for Counterterrorism, Country Reports on Terrorism 2006 dated April 2007. • References the National Counterterrorism Center (NCTC), Reports on Terrorist Incidents - 2006, dated 30 April 2007. • Deletes Appendix A, Terrorist Threat to Combatant Commands. By country assessments are available in U.S. Department of State, Office of the Coordinator for Counterterrorism, Country Reports on Terrorism 2006 dated April 2007. • Deletes Appendix C, Terrorist Operations and Tactics. These topics are covered in chapter 4 of the 2007 handbook. Emerging patterns and trends are addressed in chapter 5 of the 2007 handbook. • Deletes Appendix F, Weapons of Mass Destruction. See TRADOC G2 Handbook No.1.04. • Refers to updated 2007 Supplemental TRADOC G2 Handbook No.1.01, Terror Operations: Case Studies in Terror, dated 25 July 2007. • Refers to Supplemental DCSINT Handbook No. 1.02, Critical Infrastructure Threats and Terrorism, dated 10 August 2006. • Refers to Supplemental DCSINT Handbook No.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Army Combat Developments Command
    .... _'., ~ .""" 'I " I "_ d'" • - "-' "\. ' ~ " •••) I I . ..... ,'_ ,.;. ... ~" U : 167 : .D96 . 1969 UNITED STATES ARMY COMBAT DEVELOPMENTS COMMAND -. -­ DYNAMICS OF FIRE AND MANEUVER (FIRMA TIl) (U) FINAL REPORT AeN 13986 15 AUGUST 1969 " .". ~ ... , , . ." . ~; TYOFUSARMY CASE STUDY #11 The Battle of Osan (Korea) 1. General. The Battle of Osan was the first engagement of the ~orean War involving American troops. It was fought by a battalion­ size force to delay the enemy's advance while its parent 'unit--the 24th Infantry Division--entered Korea through the port of Pusan and assembled around Taejon in early July 1950, soon after the beginning of North Korean Communist invasion of South Korea. The battle is of special interest because it illustrates the importance of fire­ effectiveness, unit training, reliable equipment, leadership, and military discipline. The holding action at Osan revealed many weak­ nesses in the equipment and personnel of the American Army of 1950 and in its uses of fire and maneuver in a delaying action. 2. Background. On 25 June 1950 (local time), the North Korean A~ (NKA) launched a surprise invasion of South Korea. When the forces of the Republic of Korea proved unable to contain this communist onslaught, the United States intervened under the auspices of the United Nations. In late June the 8th Army occupying Japan mobilized its four divisions and ordered the 24th Infantry Division to prepare to move by sea to Korea. At that time the chief American concern was to keep control of the port of Pusan in friendly hands as the harbor which was most suitable for 8th Army's entry into Korea.
    [Show full text]
  • The Utilization of Artillery and Mortars As Infantry Support Weapons in the Chaco War
    Western Michigan University ScholarWorks at WMU Master's Theses Graduate College 6-1965 The Utilization of Artillery and Mortars as Infantry Support Weapons in the Chaco War Charles John Goodall Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/masters_theses Part of the Military, War, and Peace Commons Recommended Citation Goodall, Charles John, "The Utilization of Artillery and Mortars as Infantry Support Weapons in the Chaco War" (1965). Master's Theses. 3907. https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/masters_theses/3907 This Masters Thesis-Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate College at ScholarWorks at WMU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at WMU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE UTILIZATION OF ARTILLERY AND MORTARS AS INFANTRY SUPPORT WEAPONS IN THE CHACO WAR by Charles John Goodall A thesis presented to the Faculty of the School of Graduate Studies in partial fulfillment of the Degree of Master of Arts Western Michigan University Kalamazoo, Michigan June, 1965 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The author wishes to express his appreciation for the co-operation of the following agencies and research facilities in gathering materials and providing technical advice in the production of this thesis: The University of Texas Library, Austin, Texas. The University of North Carolina Library, Chapel Hill, North Carolina. The University of Florida Library, Gainesville, Florida. Duke University Library, Durham, North Carolina. The University of California Library, Los Angeles, California The United States Army War College, Ft. Leavenworth, Kansas. The United States Army Ordnance School, Ft.
    [Show full text]
  • ASTRA MILITARUM SOLDIERS of the IMPERIUM These Datasheets Allow You to Fight Apocalypse Battles with Your Astra Militarum Miniatures
    ASTRA MILITARUM SOLDIERS OF THE IMPERIUM These datasheets allow you to fight Apocalypse battles with your Astra Militarum miniatures. Each datasheet includes the characteristics profiles of the unit it describes, as well as any wargear and special abilities it may have. KEYWORDS Throughout these datasheets you will come across the <Regiment> keyword. This is shorthand for a keyword of your choosing, as described below. <REGIMENT> Most Astra Militarum units are drawn from a regiment. Some datasheets specify which regiment the unit is drawn from (e.g. Mukaali Riders have the Tallarn keyword, so are drawn from the Tallarn Regiment), but where a datasheet does not, it will have the <Regiment> keyword. When you include such a unit in your army, you must nominate which regiment that unit is from. You then simply replace the <Regiment> keyword in every instance on that unit’s datasheet with the name of your chosen regiment. For example, if you were to include an Atlas Recovery Tank in your army, and you decided it was from Vostroya, its <Regiment> Faction keyword is changed to Vostroyan and its Recovery Vehicle ability would then read: ‘At the end of the Action phase, this unit can to repair one friendly Vostroyan Vehicle unit in base contact with it. If it does, remove one damage marker from that Vehicle unit. Only one attempt to repair each unit can be made each turn.’ ATLAS RECOVERY TANK 5 An Atlas Recovery Tank is a unit that contains 1 model. It is equipped with: Heavy Bolter; Armoured Hull. M WS BS A W Ld Sv Atlas Recovery Tank 12" 6+ 4+ 1 2 5 6+ WEAPON TYPE RANGE A SAP SAT ABILITIES Heavy Bolter Heavy 36" 1 7+ 9+ - Heavy Stubber Heavy 36" 1 8+ 10+ - Storm Bolter Small Arms 24" 1 9+ 10+ Rapid Fire Armoured Hull Melee Melee User 10+ 10+ - WARGEAR OPTIONS • This unit can also be equipped with one of the following (Power Rating +1): 1 Heavy Stubber; 1 Storm Bolter.
    [Show full text]
  • AM General V. Activision Blizzard
    Case 1:17-cv-08644-GBD-JLC Document 218 Filed 03/31/20 Page 1 of 29 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORI( -- -- ----- -- -- ------------------------- --x AM GENERAL LLC, Plaintiff, MEMORANDUM DECISION -against- AND ORDER ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, INC., ACTIVISION 17 Civ. 8644 (GBD) PUBLISHING, INC., and MAJOR LEAGUE GAMING CORP., Defendants. --------- -- --- -- --------- -- -- -- ---- -- - --x GEORGE B. DANIELS, United States District Judge: Plaintiff AM General LLC ("AMG") brings this action against Defendants Activision Blizzard, Inc. and Activision Publishing, Inc. (collectively, "Activision") and Major League Gaming Corp. ("MLG") for trademark infringement, trade dress infringement, unfair competition, false designation of origin, false advertising, and dilution under the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1114, 1125, and 1125(c), respectively. (Compl., ECF No. 1, ~~ 82-147.) AMG also raises pendant New York state law claims for trademark infringement, unfair competition, false designation of origin, trade dress infringement, false advertising, and dilution. (Jd. ~~ 148-81.) On May 31, 2019, Defendants moved for summaty judgment on all of AMG's claims pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. (Defs. Activision and MLG's Notice of Mot. for Summ. J., ECF No. 131.) On the same day, Plaintiff moved for partial summaty judgment on Defendants' laches claim pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(a). (PI. AMG's Notice of Mot. for Partial Summ. J., ECF No. 138.) Subsequently, Defendants filed a motion to strike (1) certain portions of Plaintiffs Rule 56.1 statement of material facts and (2) the "experiment" contained in the rebuttal report of Plaintiff s expeli, Dr. Y oran Wind ("MTS I").
    [Show full text]
  • NEW INSENSITIVE RIFLED 120-Mm MORTAR AMMUNITION with ENHANCED LETHAL PERFORMANCE
    TDA Armements SAS NEW INSENSITIVE RIFLED 120-mm MORTAR AMMUNITION WITH ENHANCED LETHAL PERFORMANCE Patrick MALBO Christophe BAR (speaker) TDA Armements Route d’Ardon 45240 La Ferté Saint Aubin France Introduction The beneficial contribution of IM/Murat ordnance to the general endeavour to limit both loss of human life and platforms vulnerability during conflicts has become so obvious for many end-users that modern Armies express today a great interest in enhanced IM/Murat mortar ammunition. In order to satisfy its customers, TDA Armements has been developing since 2005 new HE & Rocket Assisted rifled mortar projectiles which all exhibit IM performance and enhanced lethal performance compared to the previous munitions. The IM/Murat signature of each mortar ammunition is to be achieved for the full complete round including the fuse and the propelling charges both fitted onto the filled body, keeping for the end-user the advantage of a delivered round ready for immediate use. Several high explosives and configurations were considered for the IM fill to match the requirement of maintaining the existing level of fragmentation already achieved with the current cast body in order to keep this mortar product affordable. The most significant engineering change was the replacement of the TNT-based fill by a cast- cured PBX from EURENCO called HBU88B which exhibited the best compromise between lethal performance, initiation and insensitivity. A few accidental aggressions were considered during 2005 to drive the first engineering change proposals due to achieve eventually the level Murat 2* for the two mortar munitions. As a priority the accidental threats which were firstly taken into account were the Slow Cook-off event, the Sympathetic detonation and the Fragment impact event.
    [Show full text]
  • The United States Atomic Army, 1956-1960 Dissertation
    INTIMIDATING THE WORLD: THE UNITED STATES ATOMIC ARMY, 1956-1960 DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Paul C. Jussel, B.A., M.M.A.S., M.S.S. * * * * * The Ohio State University 2004 Dissertation Committee Approved by Professor Allan R. Millett, Advisor Professor John R. Guilmartin __________________ Professor William R. Childs Advisor Department of History ABSTRACT The atomic bomb created a new military dynamic for the world in 1945. The bomb, if used properly, could replace the artillery fires and air-delivered bombs used to defeat the concentrated force of an enemy. The weapon provided the U.S. with an unparalleled advantage over the rest of the world, until the Soviet Union developed its own bomb by 1949 and symmetry in warfare returned. Soon, theories of warfare changed to reflect the belief that the best way to avoid the effects of the bomb was through dispersion of forces. Eventually, the American Army reorganized its divisions from the traditional three-unit organization to a new five-unit organization, dubbed pentomic by its Chief of Staff, General Maxwell D. Taylor. While atomic weapons certainly had an effect on Taylor’s reasoning to adopt the pentomic organization, the idea was not new in 1956; the Army hierarchy had been wrestling with restructuring since the end of World War II. Though the Korean War derailed the Army’s plans for the early fifties, it returned to the forefront under the Eisenhower Administration. The driving force behind reorganization in 1952 was not ii only the reoriented and reduced defense budget, but also the Army’s inroads to the atomic club, formerly the domain of only the Air Force and the Navy.
    [Show full text]