DOCSLIB.ORG

Department of Homeland Security Appropriations for Fiscal Year 2008

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Department of Homeland Security Appropriations for Fiscal Year 2008 S. HRG. 110–36 DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY APPROPRIATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2008 HEARINGS BEFORE A SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED TENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION Department of Homeland Security Nondepartmental witnesses Printed for the use of the Committee on Appropriations ( Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.gpoaccess.gov/congress/index.html U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 33–920 PDF WASHINGTON : 2007 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2250 Mail: Stop SSOP, Washington, DC 20402–0001 COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS ROBERT C. BYRD, West Virginia, Chairman DANIEL K. INOUYE, Hawaii THAD COCHRAN, Mississippi PATRICK J. LEAHY, Vermont TED STEVENS, Alaska TOM HARKIN, Iowa ARLEN SPECTER, Pennsylvania BARBARA A. MIKULSKI, Maryland PETE V. DOMENICI, New Mexico HERB KOHL, Wisconsin CHRISTOPHER S. BOND, Missouri PATTY MURRAY, Washington MITCH MCCONNELL, Kentucky BYRON L. DORGAN, North Dakota RICHARD C. SHELBY, Alabama DIANNE FEINSTEIN, California JUDD GREGG, New Hampshire RICHARD J. DURBIN, Illinois ROBERT F. BENNETT, Utah TIM JOHNSON, South Dakota LARRY CRAIG, Idaho MARY L. LANDRIEU, Louisiana KAY BAILEY HUTCHISON, Texas JACK REED, Rhode Island SAM BROWNBACK, Kansas FRANK R. LAUTENBERG, New Jersey WAYNE ALLARD, Colorado BEN NELSON, Nebraska LAMAR ALEXANDER, Tennessee TERRENCE E. SAUVAIN, Staff Director BRUCE EVANS, Minority Staff Director SUBCOMMITTEE ON THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY ROBERT C. BYRD, West Virginia, Chairman DANIEL K. INOUYE, Hawaii THAD COCHRAN, Mississippi PATRICK J. LEAHY, Vermont JUDD GREGG, New Hampshire BARBARA A. MIKULSKI, Maryland TED STEVENS, Alaska HERB KOHL, Wisconsin ARLEN SPECTER, Pennsylvania PATTY MURRAY, Washington PETE V. DOMENICI, New Mexico MARY L. LANDRIEU, Louisiana RICHARD C. SHELBY, Alabama FRANK R. LAUTENBERG, New Jersey LARRY CRAIG, Idaho BEN NELSON, Nebraska LAMAR ALEXANDER, Tennessee Professional Staff CHARLES KIEFFER CHIP WALGREN DRENAN E. DUDLEY TAD GALLION CHRISTA THOMPSON REBECCA DAVIES (Minority) CAROL CRIBBS (Minority) MARK VAN DE WATER (Minority) (II) CONTENTS THURSDAY, MARCH 8, 2007 Page Department of Homeland Security ......................................................................... 1 Nondepartmental Witnesses ................................................................................... 185 (III) DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY APPROPRIATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2008 THURSDAY, MARCH 8, 2007 U.S. SENATE, SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS, Washington, DC. The subcommittee met at 2:35 p.m., in room SD–192, Dirksen Senate Office Building, Hon. Robert C. Byrd (chairman) presiding. Present: Senators Byrd, Leahy, Murray, Landrieu, Lautenberg, Nelson, Cochran, Stevens, Shelby, Craig, and Alexander. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY STATEMENT OF HON. MICHAEL CHERTOFF, SECRETARY OPENING STATEMENT OF SENATOR ROBERT C. BYRD Senator BYRD. Welcome, Secretary Chertoff. You’ve been here long enough to know what the problems are, and you should be able to answer the tough questions. This is the first hearing of the Homeland Security Subcommittee during the 110th Congress. The Department of Homeland Security has had the benefit of oversight from two excellent Subcommittee chairmen during the Department’s 4-year history. Senator Thad Cochran, and Senator Judd Gregg. It would be difficult, Mr. Chair- man, to live up to the standard that you and Senator Gregg have set. But, I look forward to the challenge. Mr. Secretary, thank you for appearing here today. You manage a department that employs over 192,000 dedicated men and women. These workers serve on the front lines. The front lines, securing our ports and waterways, securing our borders, en- forcing our immigration laws, protecting the 600 million flyers who use our airports each year, and responding to disasters. I commend them for their dedication, and their service to preserving our free- doms and securing our homeland. Two years ago, Senator Craig and I, with support from Chairman Gregg offered an amendment to begin the process of hiring and training a significant number of border patrol agents, and immigra- tion investigators. Despite opposition from the White House, the funds for enhanced border security were enacted into law. Since 2004, on a bipartisan basis, we have increased the number of border patrol agents by 4,000, the number of immigration enforcement personnel by 1,373, and the number of detention beds by 9,150. (1) 2 So, Mr. Secretary, I’m pleased that the President’s budget for fis- cal year 2008 includes significant additional resources for improv- ing security at our borders. Regrettably, the President’s budget did not commit significant re- sources to other known vulnerabilities in this country. The admin- istration continues to attempt to secure the Nation on the cheap. In every State of the Union address since the attacks on 9/11, the President has raised the specter of another attack. In January he said, ‘‘Every success against a terrorist is a re- minder of the shoreless ambitions of this enemy. In the 6 years since our Nation was attacked, I wish I could report to you that the dangers have ended. They have not.’’ Yet, when you dig through the details and decipher the book-cooking in the Presi- dent’s budget, and truly understand the consequences of the budg- et, the increase that is proposed for Homeland Security is only 1 percent, 1 percent. The administration has a huge credibility gap when it comes to Homeland Security. In August, after the arrests in Britain of po- tential terrorists who plotted to blow up commercial airliners over the Atlantic Ocean, you elevated the threat-risk level in the avia- tion sector to ‘‘orange,’’ or high, orange. And it remains there today, orange. Yet, the President’s budget that is before the subcommittee, pro- poses to cut funding for purchasing and installing explosives-detec- tion equipment at airports by 17 percent. According to your own Department’s nationwide plan review, 61 percent of the States, and 69 percent of the urban areas, do not have adequate plans to respond to a catastrophic event. Hurricanes Katrina, Rita and Wilma, certainly proved that we are not pre- pared to respond to such an event, or a mass evacuation. Yet, the President’s budget proposes to cut first responder grants by $1.2 billion—B-I-L-L-I-O-N—$1.2 billion, and to freeze funding for emergency management performance grants. In recent years there have been deadly attacks on trains in Lon- don, Madrid, Moscow, Tokyo, and Mumbai, India. Hundreds of in- nocent people have lost their lives. The Department has responded with unenforceable policy directives, two small pilot projects, the results of which have not been applied nationally, and a budget that proposes to fund the mass transit and rail security program at the inadequate 2007 level of $175 million. I also figure that the Department is far too reliant on what I would call paper security. The Department is reliant on standards that are not enforced, and on reports prepared by contractors that are never executed. Five years since 9/11, the majority of cargo con- tainers that are loaded onto passenger aircraft are not N-O-T not inspected. We rely on a paper process for determining the threat potential of 3,800 freight forwarders, who have access to air cargo in 10,000 facilities. Congress has added funding for 300 air cargo inspectors, none of whom are being used to actually inspect cargo. Now, with regard to inspecting the 11 million cargo containers that are shipped into this country, we physically inspect only 5 to 7 percent. How, how, how can you ride herd on an aggressive and regular basis over more than 6,100 trading partners in nearly 60 countries who ship cargo into this country with only 157 supply- 3 chain security specialists? And yet, the President does not seek ad- ditional security specialists for fiscal year 2008. Mr. Secretary, you have taken on the task of managing a Depart- ment within an organization that was flawed at its inception. I said so then. Flawed at its inception. In its short 4-year history, the De- partment has been reorganized nine times. I know you’re committed to securing the homeland. But I do not understand why this administration insists on hamstringing the Department with a status quo budget. Can you explain that? Can anyone? I doubt it. Mr. Secretary, you have a tough job. Following any opening re- marks that Senator Cochran might have, we look forward to your testimony. Senator Cochran. STATEMENT OF SENATOR THAD COCHRAN Senator COCHRAN. Mr. Chairman, I’m pleased to join you in wel- coming the distinguished Secretary of Homeland Security to our Committee. We appreciate his leadership of the Department, and his assistance in describing the Department’s priorities as we begin the year’s appropriations process. The discretionary appropriations request included in the budget submitted for the Department is $32.4 billion, which is an increase of just over 1 percent from the current year’s level. Mr. Secretary, I compliment you for not including the presump- tion that aviation security fees will be approved by the Congress. I also want to compliment you for the Department’s response to the U.K. airline bombing plot last August. The Transportation Security Administration deserves commendation for creating a flexible pro- gram to meet threats to aviation. In the past 2 years, you have managed a substantial increase in funding for border security, and you have overseen the ending of the practice of catch-and-release on the Southwest border. I’m also pleased to see that you are on-track to meet the aggressive hiring targets that were funded during the past 2 years for Customs and Border Protection, and Immigration and Customs Enforcement. PREPARED STATEMENT The people of my State appreciate very much the Department’s efforts to respond to the Hurricanes Katrina and Rita.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2020 Training Cata
    Training for the Military HIGH MOBILITY MULTIPURPOSE WHEELED VEHICLE 0665 FIELD SERVICE AND MILITARY TRAINING COURSE CATALOG Aftermarket Fulfillment and Training Center (AFTC) 5448 Dylan Drive, South Bend, Indiana 46628 Contents General Information 4 Student Registration 5 Payment Information 5 Advanced Mobility / Maintenance / BDAR 6 Field Maintenance Training 8 Sustainment Maintenance Training 10 4L80E Transmission Maintenance Training 12 “ Whether it is ‘training readiness,,’’ combat operations, Air Conditioning Systems Maintenance 14 oror domesticdomestic response to floods and other natural disasters, itit isis thethe soldiersoldier inin hishis oror herher HumveeHumvee thatthat AmeriAmerica sees Alternator / Starter / Electrical Systems Maintenance 16 ccoming to their aide.” —Major—Major GeneGenerral Courtneeyy CarCarrr,, IIndiana Naationaltional GuaGuarrd Diesel Fuel Injection Pump Maintenance Training 17 Visitor Information 18 2 3 2 Our program development experience has been Training gained throtugh the development of training on a myriad of equipment from the Humvee through Program various tactical bridging equipment, such as the Improved Ribbon Bridge, the Rapidly Emplaced Bridge Development System, all of the MK II series Bridge Erection Boats, as well as MRAP, LTAS Wrecker, water purification and AM General’s Military Training Department fuel distribution systems. is a TRADOC certified world leader in All of our training programs are written to comply with training program development. TRADOC Regulation 350-70. Our expert program writers and Military Training Department Staff graphic llustrators are highly trained, AM General’s Training Department provides and credentialed professionals. professional training programs at all military skill (echelon) levels for Army systems used in the military inventory. Our technical writers and program to develop professional programs of instruction (POI).
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Robotic Systems to Carry out Traverse Execution, Opportunistic Science, and Landing Site Evaluation Tasks
    NASA/TM-2011-216157 Evaluation of Robotic Systems to Carry Out Traverse Execution, Opportunistic Science, and Landing Site Evaluation Tasks Stephen J. Hoffman, PhD1, Matthew J. Leonard2, Pascal Lee, PhD3 1Science Applications International Corporation, Houston 2NASA Johnson Space Center, Houston 3Mars Institute, SETI Institute, Moffett Field, California National Aeronautics and Space Administration Johnson Space Center Houston, TX 77058 September 2011 THE NASA STI PROGRAM OFFICE . IN PROFILE Since its founding, NASA has been dedicated to • CONFERENCE PUBLICATION. Collected the advancement of aeronautics and space papers from scientific and technical science. The NASA Scientific and Technical conferences, symposia, seminars, or other Information (STI) Program Office plays a key meetings sponsored or cosponsored by part in helping NASA maintain this important NASA. role. • SPECIAL PUBLICATION. Scientific, technical, or historical information from The NASA STI Program Office is operated by NASA programs, projects, and mission, Langley Research Center, the lead center for often concerned with subjects having NASA’s scientific and technical information. substantial public interest. The NASA STI Program Office provides access to the NASA STI Database, the largest • TECHNICAL TRANSLATION English- collection of aeronautical and space science STI language translations of foreign scientific in the world. The Program Office is also and technical material pertinent to NASA’s NASA’s institutional mechanism for mission. disseminating the results of its research and Specialized services that complement the STI development activities. These results are Program Office’s diverse offerings include published by NASA in the NASA STI Report creating custom thesauri, building customized Series, which includes the following report databases, organizing and publishing research types: results .
    [Show full text]
  • AM General V. Activision Blizzard
    Case 1:17-cv-08644-GBD-JLC Document 218 Filed 03/31/20 Page 1 of 29 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORI( -- -- ----- -- -- ------------------------- --x AM GENERAL LLC, Plaintiff, MEMORANDUM DECISION -against- AND ORDER ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, INC., ACTIVISION 17 Civ. 8644 (GBD) PUBLISHING, INC., and MAJOR LEAGUE GAMING CORP., Defendants. --------- -- --- -- --------- -- -- -- ---- -- - --x GEORGE B. DANIELS, United States District Judge: Plaintiff AM General LLC ("AMG") brings this action against Defendants Activision Blizzard, Inc. and Activision Publishing, Inc. (collectively, "Activision") and Major League Gaming Corp. ("MLG") for trademark infringement, trade dress infringement, unfair competition, false designation of origin, false advertising, and dilution under the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1114, 1125, and 1125(c), respectively. (Compl., ECF No. 1, ~~ 82-147.) AMG also raises pendant New York state law claims for trademark infringement, unfair competition, false designation of origin, trade dress infringement, false advertising, and dilution. (Jd. ~~ 148-81.) On May 31, 2019, Defendants moved for summaty judgment on all of AMG's claims pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. (Defs. Activision and MLG's Notice of Mot. for Summ. J., ECF No. 131.) On the same day, Plaintiff moved for partial summaty judgment on Defendants' laches claim pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(a). (PI. AMG's Notice of Mot. for Partial Summ. J., ECF No. 138.) Subsequently, Defendants filed a motion to strike (1) certain portions of Plaintiffs Rule 56.1 statement of material facts and (2) the "experiment" contained in the rebuttal report of Plaintiff s expeli, Dr. Y oran Wind ("MTS I").
    [Show full text]
  • FEMA: in Or Out?
    Department of Homeland Security Office of Inspector General FEMA: In or Out? OIG-09-25 February 2009 OIG Department of Homeland Security Office of Inspector General Introduction “Since the end of World War II, Congress and Presidents have debated, formulated, and revised administrative responsibilities for emergency management.”1 Some of the important questions that have been the subject of debate over the past 60 years, and that are particularly relevant today in the “FEMA In or Out” debate, include: � What the jurisdictional boundaries of the agency charged with emergency management should be; � How responsibility for new or emerging threats should be assigned; � Whether it is necessary (or advisable) to distinguish between natural and manmade threats; � What is meant by “all-hazards,” and what elements need to be present in an agency with an all-hazards mission; � What the relationship between crisis management and consequence management should be; and � What the relationships among the federal, state and local governments should be during a disaster, and whether the relationships should change in the face of a catastrophe. On December 17, 2008, Congressman James L. Oberstar, Chairman of the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, reopened the debate by submitting a memorandum to President-elect Barack H. Obama, recommending that the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) “be re-instated as an independent, cabinet-level agency reporting directly to the President.”2 Two days later, Congressman Bennie G. Thompson, Chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee, recommended the opposite–that FEMA remain a part of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), warning that “FEMA removal from DHS would likely result in the hamstringing of 1 Henry B.
    [Show full text]
  • Blank Logs Template
    FOIA Requests Closed by OIP in September 2017 Request Number Office Submitted Date Date Closed Summary of Request Disposition of Request DOJ-2017-006081 DAG 08/15/2017 09/01/2017 Copy of the September 9, 2015 memorandum from former Deputy Attorney Full grant General Sally Yates pertaining to individual accountability for corporate wrongdoing. DOJ-2017-005839 AG 08/04/2017 09/01/2017 Records submitted pursuant to Executive Order 13800, Strengthening the All records referred to another Cybersecurity of Federal Networks and Critical Infrastructure. agency DOJ-2017-005919 OIP 08/08/2017 09/06/2017 Records concerning Freedom of Information Act requests and responses No records regarding Senator Joe Manchin submitted since November 2012. DOJ-2017-005681 AG 07/26/2017 09/06/2017 Records concerning the Attorney General's Summer Intern Lecture Series. Other - Directed Requester to Another Entity Subject to the FOIA DOJ-2017-004908 AG 06/26/2017 09/06/2017 Records concerning the Attorney General's Summer Intern Lecture Series. Other - Directed Requester to Another Entity Subject to the FOIA DOJ-2017-005914 AG 08/08/2017 09/06/2017 Records pertaining to meeting between President Bill Clinton and Attorney Partial grant/partial denial General Loretta Lynch that took place at the Phoenix airport in June 2016. DOJ-2014-000036 ASG 10/21/2013 09/06/2017 Records resulting from a search of the Departmental Executive Secretariat All records referred to another database involving the term "Guantanamo." agency DOJ-2015-000022 AG 10/22/2014 09/06/2017 Records concerning the Department of Justice Obscenity Prosecution Task Full grant Force in 2011.
    [Show full text]
  • Soldier Armed M134D Minigun
    Soldier Armed M134D Minigun By Scott R. Gourley said the company did not know much examples designed to debunk what he about ground vehicles at that time: “In characterized as “common misconcep - round the time these pages go to the early years, we developed some in - tions about the system.” The minigun Apress, selected U.S. Army ele - tegration kits. They worked well, they is frequently mischaracterized as an ments in Afghanistan should be receiv - got integrated overseas and customers aviation-specific piece of equipment ing the first several dozen integration were happy. We knew we could do that is not suited for ground purposes, kits designed to equip their Common better, so we got more and more into he said. Remotely Operated Weapon Stations the ground vehicle market. We did it “That myth has been busted now that (CROWS) with the M134D minigun. because we had customers who had we have fielded them, used them, got - “The M134D is a very, very small ground vehicle requirements. We knew ten into gunfights with them, and suc - family of weapons,” said Chris Dillon, we could do a better job, but we had ceeded tenfold at suppressing and elim - vice president at manufacturer Dillon no idea that ground vehicles were go - inating the enemy with the weapon Aero, Inc. “The M134 is a six-barreled, ing to be a big deal. system,” said a former Army Special electrically operated Gatling-type ma - “The ground environment has re - Forces NCO who has employed Hum- chine gun that fires at a fixed rate of ally adopted the weapons system be - vee-mounted M134Ds in combat.
    [Show full text]
  • Department of Finance and Administration
    Department of Finance and Administration Legislative Impact Statement Bill: HB1073 Bill Subtitle: CONCERNING FORMER MILITARY VEHICLES; TO AUTHORIZE THE ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF TITLE FOR A FORMER MILITARY VEHICLE. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Basic Change : Sponsor: Rep. Brandt Smith HB1073 amends Arkansas Code Title 27, Chapter 14, Subchapter 7 and adds a new section, § 27-14-728, to authorize DFA to issue of a certificate of title for a “former military vehicle”. Under the bill, a “former military vehicle” is a motor vehicle manufactured for use by the United States Armed Forces which is sold or transferred with a federal proof of ownership certificate that establishes the motor vehicle for off-road use only. Revenue Impact : Unknown revenue increase to the Highway and Transportation Department if former military vehicles are titled and registered. Taxpayer Impact : Owners of former military vehicles as defined in the bill could title such vehicles if the vehicle meets safety and equipment standards and if all application requirements are met. Resources Required : None. Time Required : Adequate time is provided. Procedural Changes : System Programming and revisions to the Motor Vehicle Procedures Manual would be required. Other Comments : May be subject to enforcement by the Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Administration and the Arkansas Highway Police if they do not meet the federal safety requirements. Another issue presented by the bill is that some former military vehicles do not have rubber or pneumatic tires as is currently required by Arkansas law for highway use. There are some former military vehicles that are tracked vehicles that are not equipped with tires. Legal Analysis : Under current Department of Finance and Administration (DFA) procedures, an owner of a High Mobility Multipurpose Wheeled Vehicle (Humvee) that is older than 25 years may obtain a certificate of title from the Office of Motor Vehicle (OMV).
    [Show full text]
  • Arif Alikhan Thad Allen Howard Berman Michael Chertoff David
    24 Streamlining and Consolidating Congressional Oversight of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security Appendix Task Force on Streamlining and Consolidating Congressional Oversight of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security Task Force Members Arif Alikhan Juliette Kayyem Thad Allen Thomas H. Kean Sr. Howard Berman Loretta Sanchez Michael Chertoff John Tanner David Dreier Caryn A. Wagner Bob Graham Kenneth L. Wainstein Lee H. Hamilton Retreat Organizers Meryl Justin Chertoff Kathleen Hall Jamieson Biographical Information on Retreat Hamilton. Allen supports the firm’s work with Participants and Organizers the departments of Justice and Homeland Security. Allen completed his distinguished Arif Alikhan career in the U.S. Coast Guard as its 23rd Counterterrorism and homeland security commandant. Prior to that assignment, Allen expert Arif Alikhan joined Los Angeles World served as Coast Guard chief of staff. During Airports as the new deputy executive director his tenure in that post, in 2005, he was for law enforcement and homeland security on designated principal federal official for the Nov. 7, 2011. Prior to that, Alikhan was a U.S. government’s response and recovery Distinguished Professor of Homeland Security operations in the aftermath of hurricanes and Counterterrorism at National Defense Katrina and Rita in the Gulf Coast region. University in Washington, D.C. Alikhan previously served as assistant secretary for Howard Berman policy development at the U.S. Department of Howard Berman is a former representative Homeland Security. His federal service also from California who served 15 consecutive includes 10 years with the U.S. Department of terms in the U.S. House of Representatives Justice as a federal prosecutor and senior from 1982 to 2012.
    [Show full text]
  • Worldwide Equipment Guide Volume 2: Air and Air Defense Systems
    Dec Worldwide Equipment Guide 2016 Worldwide Equipment Guide Volume 2: Air and Air Defense Systems TRADOC G-2 ACE–Threats Integration Ft. Leavenworth, KS Distribution Statement: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. 1 UNCLASSIFIED Worldwide Equipment Guide Opposing Force: Worldwide Equipment Guide Chapters Volume 2 Volume 2 Air and Air Defense Systems Volume 2 Signature Letter Volume 2 TOC and Introduction Volume 2 Tier Tables – Fixed Wing, Rotary Wing, UAVs, Air Defense Chapter 1 Fixed Wing Aviation Chapter 2 Rotary Wing Aviation Chapter 3 UAVs Chapter 4 Aviation Countermeasures, Upgrades, Emerging Technology Chapter 5 Unconventional and SPF Arial Systems Chapter 6 Theatre Missiles Chapter 7 Air Defense Systems 2 UNCLASSIFIED Worldwide Equipment Guide Units of Measure The following example symbols and abbreviations are used in this guide. Unit of Measure Parameter (°) degrees (of slope/gradient, elevation, traverse, etc.) GHz gigahertz—frequency (GHz = 1 billion hertz) hp horsepower (kWx1.341 = hp) Hz hertz—unit of frequency kg kilogram(s) (2.2 lb.) kg/cm2 kg per square centimeter—pressure km kilometer(s) km/h km per hour kt knot—speed. 1 kt = 1 nautical mile (nm) per hr. kW kilowatt(s) (1 kW = 1,000 watts) liters liters—liquid measurement (1 gal. = 3.785 liters) m meter(s)—if over 1 meter use meters; if under use mm m3 cubic meter(s) m3/hr cubic meters per hour—earth moving capacity m/hr meters per hour—operating speed (earth moving) MHz megahertz—frequency (MHz = 1 million hertz) mach mach + (factor) —aircraft velocity (average 1062 km/h) mil milliradian, radial measure (360° = 6400 mils, 6000 Russian) min minute(s) mm millimeter(s) m/s meters per second—velocity mt metric ton(s) (mt = 1,000 kg) nm nautical mile = 6076 ft (1.152 miles or 1.86 km) rd/min rounds per minute—rate of fire RHAe rolled homogeneous armor (equivalent) shp shaft horsepower—helicopter engines (kWx1.341 = shp) µm micron/micrometer—wavelength for lasers, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • HMMWV Operators Manual
    ARMY TM 9-2320-280-10 AIR FORCE TO 36A12-1A-2091-1 MARINE CORPS TM 2320-10/6B (SUPERSEDES TM 9-2320-280-10, 18 JUNE 1991) OPERATOR’S MANUAL FOR TRUCK, UTILITY: CARGO/TROOP CARRIER, 1-1/4 TON, 4X4, M998 (2320-01-107-7155) (EIC: BBD); M998A1 (2320-01-371-9577) (EIC: BBN); TRUCK, UTILITY: CARGO/TROOP CARRIER, 1-1/4 TON, 4X4, W/WINCH, M1038 (2320-01-107-7156) (EIC: BBE); M1038A1 (2320-01-371-9578) (EIC: BBP); TRUCK, UTILITY: HEAVY VARIANT, 4X4, M1097 (2320-01-346-9317) (EIC: BBM); M1097A1 (2320-01-371-9583) (EIC: BBU); M1097A2 (2320-01-380-8604) (EIC: BB6); M1123 (2320-01-455-9593) (EIC: B6G); TRUCK, UTILITY: TOW CARRIER, ARMORED, 1-1/4 TON, 4X4, M966 (2320-01-107-7153) (EIC: BBC); M966A1 (2320-01-372-3932) (EIC: BBX); M1121 (2320-01-956-1282) (EIC: B6H); TRUCK, UTILITY: TOW CARRIER, ARMORED, 1-1/4 TON, 4X4, W/WINCH, M1036 (2320-01-107-7154) (EIC: BBH); TRUCK, UTILITY: TOW CARRIER, W/SUPPLEMENTAL ARMOR, 1-1/4 TON, 4X4, M1045 (2320-01-146-7191); M1045A1 (2320-01-371-9580) (EIC: BBR); M1045A2 (2320-01-380-8229) (EIC: BB5); TRUCK, UTILITY: TOW CARRIER, W/SUPPLEMENTAL ARMOR, 1-1/4 TON, 4X4, W/WINCH, M1046 (2320-01-146-7188); M1046A1 (2320-01-371-9582) (EIC: BBT); TRUCK, UTILITY: ARMAMENT CARRIER, ARMORED, 1-1/4 TON, 4X4, M1025 (2320-01-128-9551) (EIC: BBF); M1025A1 (2320-01-371-9584) (EIC: BBV); M1025A2 (2320-01-380-8233) (EIC: BB3); TRUCK, UTILITY: ARMAMENT CARRIER, ARMORED, 1-1/4 TON, 4X4, W/WINCH, M1026 (2320-01-128-9552) (EIC: BBG); M1026A1 (2320-01-371-9579) (EIC: BBQ); TRUCK, UTILITY: ARMAMENT CARRIER, W/SUPPLEMENTAL ARMOR, 1-1/4 TON, 4X4,
    [Show full text]
  • Product Manager Excalibur Product Manager Mortars Systems
    M1117 armored security vehicle tar weapon systems include the 60 mm, 81 mm and 120 mm mortars and related equipment. Fire-control systems, used to calculate mortar missions, include new, improved systems like the mortar fire-con- trol system-heavy (MFCS-H) and the light- weight handheld mortar ballistic com- puter (LHMBC). The M224 60 mm mortar weapon sys- tem is a lightweight, high-angle-of-fire, smooth-bore, manportable, muzzle-loaded mortar with improved rate-of-fire capabili- ties. The M224 consists of the following components: M225 cannon (tube), M170 bipod assembly, M7 baseplate, M8 auxil- tillery combat observation lasing teams Product Manager Excalibur iary baseplate and the M64A1 sight unit. (COLTs) in both heavy and Infantry brigade The Product Manager Excalibur (PM Ex- The M224 fires the complete family of 60 combat teams, the Armored Knight will calibur) is developing Excalibur, a preci- mm ammunition, such as high explosive, combine the proven armored security vehi- sion, autonomously guided, long-range ar- smoke, illumination, infrared illumination cle with the M707 Knight mission equip- tillery system. and practice cartridges. With ranges from ment package. The XM982 Excalibur is a 155 mm preci- 70 meters to 3,500 meters, the M224 meets The resultant M1200 Armored Knight sion-guided artillery round with extended lethality, range and weight requirements will provide COLTs with increased armor range. Already being fielded to warfight- for light forces without an additional trans- protection, payload and agility. Textron ers and successfully employed in combat portation requirement. Marine and Land Systems is presently un- operations, Excalibur uses GPS precision- The M252 81 mm mortar system is a der contract with the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • In the United States District Court for the District of Columbia
    Case 1:06-cv-01988-ESH Document 12 Filed 02/08/2007 Page 1 of 33 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION, ) ) Plaintiff, ) Consolidated Cases ) v. ) Civil Action No. 06-1988 (ESH) ) DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, ) Civil Action No. 06-2154 (RBW) ) Defendant. ) ) PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 56, plaintiff Electronic Frontier Foundation respectfully moves for partial summary judgment on the issue of its entitlement to expedited processing of requests submitted to defendant Department of Homeland Security under the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552. In support of its motion, plaintiff submits the accompanying memorandum of points and authorities and statement of material facts. Respectfully submitted, /s/ David L. Sobel DAVID L. SOBEL D.C. Bar No. 360418 MARCIA HOFMANN D.C. Bar No. 484136 ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION 1875 Connecticut Avenue, N.W. Suite 650 Washington, DC 20009 (202) 797-9009 Counsel for Plaintiff Case 1:06-cv-01988-ESH Document 12 Filed 02/08/2007 Page 2 of 33 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION, ) ) Plaintiff, ) Consolidated Cases ) v. ) Civil Action No. 06-1988 (ESH) ) DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, ) Civil Action No. 06-2154 (RBW) ) Defendant. ) ) MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND REQUEST FOR EXPEDITED CONSIDERATION Plaintiff Electronic Frontier Foundation (“EFF”) respectfully submits this memorandum of points and authorities in support of its motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of the expedited processing of Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”) requests pending before defendant Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”).
    [Show full text]