2020 1St Half-Year
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Privačių Pirminės Sveikatos Priežiūros Paslaugų Prieinamumas Kauno Mieste
„Visuomenės sVeikata” ORIGINALŪS STRAIPSNIAI AVAILABILITY OF PRIVATE PRIMARY HEALTH CARE IN THE CITY OF KAUNAS Leonas Valius1, Daina Krančiukaitė-Butylkinienė1, 2 1Department of Family Medicine, Medical Academy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences 2Institute of Cardiology, Medical Academy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences Summary The aim of the study. To evaluate patients’ opinion about the accessibility of the provided services in private primary healthcare institutions of Kaunas city. The contingent and the methods of the study. The study was conducted in 2009. A questionnaire survey involving 280 people was carried out. All of them were registered with family physicians at primary health care institutions. For the study, we used 20-item anonymous questionnaires which focused on the availability of services provided by primary health care institutions. The studied attributes were described as relative values expressed as percentage, and 95 % confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. The chi-square criterion was applied for the comparison of the distribution of the analyzed features among the clinics. Results. The study showed that 73.5 % (95 % CI=68.3–78.7 %) of the respondents spent up to half an hour to reach their health care institutions. Also, 61.8 % (95 % CI=56.1–67.5 %) of the respondents indicated that they spent less than 5 minutes when waiting at the reception, while 58.4 % (95 % CI=52.6–64.2 %) of the respondents stated that they spent over 15 minutes when waiting at a family physician’s office door. The survey also showed that 41.9 % (95 % CI=36.1– 47.6 %) of the patients thought that waiting lines at primary healthcare institutions were inevitable. -
Kauno Gyventojų Aplinkos Ir Sveikatos Pilotinis Tyrimas
KAUNO GYVENTOJŲ APLINKOS IR SVEIKATOS PILOTINIS TYRIMAS Sandra Andrušaitytė*, Regina Gražulevičienė, Audrius Dėdelė Vytauto Didžiojo Universiteto Gamtos mokslų fakultetas Sandra Andrušaitytė ([email protected]) 1 http://citieshealth.vdu.lt/ Įvadas Dauguma socialinių mokslų projektų siekia įtraukti bendruomenes į mokslinių tyrimų planavimą, duomenų rinkimą ir duomenų analizės procesus. Tačiau iki šiol nėra pakankamai pagrįstų įrodymų apie gyvenamosios aplinkos kokybės poveikį miestiečių sveikatai, su kenksmingais aplinkos veiksniais susijusias lėtines ligas. Atlikti epidemiologiniai tyrimai nustatė, kad kontaktas su gamtine aplinka turi teigiamą poveikį žmonių sveikatai, pagerėja psichinė sveikata, sumažėja širdies ir kraujagyslių ligų, nutukimo, diabeto rizika ir rizika, susijusi su mirtingumu nuo visų priežasčių. Tačiau iki šiol stokojama tyrimų, pagrindžiančių ryšį tarp gyvenamosios aplinkos kokybės ir savo sveikatos vertinimo. Kaune įgyvendinant Europos Komisijos HORIZON-2020 programos projektą „Miestų sveikata, miestiečių aplinkos ir sveikatos moksliniai tyrimai - CitieS Health“, bus siekiama įtraukti miestiečius į tyrimą ir išsiaiškinti gyvenamosios aplinkos poveikį jų sveikatai. 2 Tikslas Nustatyti miestiečių gyvenamosios aplinkos kokybės ryšį su sveikata ir atsakyti į klausimą: kodėl kai kuriose Kauno miesto seniūnijose miestiečiai dažniau savo sveikatą vertina kaip „bloga sveikata“. 3 Metodika ● Informacija apie projektą ir kvietimas dalyvauti tyrime buvo paskelbti Kauno pilotinės studijos internetiniame puslapyje (http://citieshealth.vdu.lt/), -
Lithuania's Implementation of Corporate Governance Accession Review Recommendations
Note by the OECD Secretariat on Lithuania’s implementation of corporate governance accession review recommendations This Secretariat Note considers Lithuania’s progress in implementing the recommendations of the OECD Corporate Governance Committee's Corporate Governance Accession Review [published as OECD (2018), Corporate Governance in Lithuania https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264302617-en]. It was discussed by the Corporate Governance Committee and the Working Party on State Ownership and Privatisation Practices at their meeting in November 2020. For further information, contact [email protected]. LITHUANIA’S IMPLEMENTATION OF CORPORATE GOVERNANCE ACCESSION REVIEW RECOMMENDATIONS © OECD 2020 2 Table of contents Table of contents 2 1. Purpose and structure 4 2. Lithuania’s implementation of the priority recommendations related to the Principles of Corporate Governance 5 2.1. (i) Monitoring implementation of reforms to the company law and related laws 5 2.2. (ii) Medium-term plans to further strengthen board responsibilities 7 2.3. (iii) Recent company law amendments to strengthen independence criteria for listed company boards 8 3. Lithuania’s implementation of the additional recommendations related to the Principles of Corporate Governance 10 4. Lithuania’s implementation of the priority recommendations related to the SOE Guidelines 12 4.1. (i) Eliminating voting instructions 19 4.2. (ii) Further improving the board selection process 20 4.3. (iii) Corporatising commercially oriented statutory SOEs 23 5. Lithuania’s implementation of the additional recommendation related to the SOE Guidelines 27 6. Conclusions 28 6.1. Lithuania’s implementation of the priority recommendations 28 6.2. Lithuania’s implementation of the additional recommendations 30 6.3. -
Annual Report 2009
2009 Annual Report 1 CONTENTS 3 INTRODUCTION 4 REVIEW OF COMMERCIAL AND FINANCIAL ACTIVITIES 8 FREIGHT SERVICES 11 PASSENGER SERVICES 14 ROLLING STOCK 17 INFRASTRUCTURE 18 TECHNICAL DEVELOPMENT AND INVESTMENT POLICY 21 TRAFFIC SAFETY 22 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 24 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES 26 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS 29 HUMAN RESOURCES 32 MANAGEMENT STRUCTURE OF AB LIETUVOS GELEžinkELIAI 33 MAIN EVENTS 34 INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT 36 BALANCE SHEETS 38 INCOME STATEMENTS Dear Readers, In 2009, AB Lietuvos Geležinkeliai operated on an even keel, as well as at a profit. The Company’s operations and their results were evidently adapted by the economic downturn in Lithuania and neigh bouring countries. Transit rail freight transported to the Kaliningrad Region decreased by more than 30 per cent; a fall in the production and sales volumes in Lithuanian companies (AB ORLEN Lietuva, AB Achema, AB Akmenės Cementas) resulted in a considerable loss of domestic freight. The freight flows were stabilised only in the second half of 2009 through close cooperation of our specialist staff with freight consignors and representatives of railway undertakings in other countries. However, modern technologies, effective management and the implemented system of risk management ensured steady operations of the Company even in the period of crisis. AB Lietuvos Geležinkeliai is a major transport company in Lithuania. The Company together with its daughter companies employ around 12,000 people. The Company produces approximately 1.3 per cent of the GDP and is one of the largest tax payers in Lithuania. About two thirds of the income of AB Lietuvos Geležinkeliai is generated from foreign customers. The Company focuses on the improvement in management and control by implementing information systems and modern management methods. -
NONVIOLENT RESISTANCE in LITHUANIA a Story of Peaceful Liberation
NONVIOLENT RESISTANCE IN LITHUANIA A Story of Peaceful Liberation Grazina Miniotaite The Albert Einstein Institution www.aeinstein.org 2 CONTENTS Acknowledgments Introduction Chapter 1: Nonviolent Resistance Against Russification in the Nineteenth Century The Goals of Tsarism in Lithuania The Failure of Colonization The Struggle for the Freedom of Religion The Struggle for Lithuanian Press and Education Chapter 2: Resistance to Soviet Rule, 1940–1987 An Overview Postwar Resistance The Struggle for the Freedom of Faith The Struggle for Human and National Rights The Role of Lithuanian Exiles Chapter 3: The Rebirth From Perestroika to the Independence Movement Test of Fortitude The Triumph of Sajudis Chapter 4: Towards Independence The Struggle for Constitutional Change Civil Disobedience Step by Step The Rise of Reactionary Opposition Chapter 5: The Struggle for International Recognition The Declaration of Independence Independence Buttressed: the Battle of Laws First Signs of International Recognition The Economic Blockade The January Events Nonviolent Action in the January Events International Reaction 3 Chapter 6: Towards Civilian-Based Defense Resistance to the “Creeping Occupation” Elements of Civilian-Based Defense From Nonviolent Resistance to Organized Civilian-Based Defense The Development of Security and Defense Policy in Lithuania since 1992 Concluding Remarks Appendix I Appeal to Lithuanian Youth by the Supreme Council of the Republic of Lithuania Appendix II Republic in Danger! Appendix III Appeal by the Government of the Republic -
AB Lietuvos Geležinkeliai Annual Report Contents
2020 AB Lietuvos Geležinkeliai Annual Report Contents CEO FOREWORD 3 BASIC INFORMATION ABOUT THE GROUP AND THE COMPANY 4 ACTIVITY OF THE GROUP 7 GROUP STRUCTURE 9 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE 10 STRATEGY 27 MOST SIGNIFICANT EVENTS IN 2020 34 EVENTS AFTER THE END OF THE REPORTING PERIOD 40 OVERVIEW OF THE GROUP’S KPIS 41 ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL AND OPERATIONAL PERFORMANCE 45 GROUP PERFORMANCE RESULTS 45 SPECIAL OBLIGATIONS 52 PERFORMANCE OF THE MAIN GROUP COMPANIES 54 INVESTMENTS 62 EMPLOYEES 66 RISKS AND THEIR MANAGEMENT 71 INFORMATION ON THE COMPLIANCE WITH THE GUIDELINES ON TRANSPARENCY 73 CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY REPORT 76 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 86 INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT 87 CONSOLIDATED AND SEPARATE STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL POSITION 93 CONSOLIDATED AND SEPARATE STATEMENTS OF PROFIT OR LOSS AND OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME 95 CONSOLIDATED AND SEPARATE STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY 96 CONSOLIDATED AND SEPARATE STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS 98 EXPLANATORY NOTES 100 ABBREVIATIONS: LTG – AB Lietuvos Geležinkeliai LTG Group, Group, LTG Corporate Group – AB Lietuvos Gelsauga – LUAB Gelsauga Geležinkeliai and its subsidiaries Saugos Paslaugos – UAB Saugos Paslaugos LTG Cargo – AB LTG Cargo RBS – UAB Rail Baltica Statyba LTG Link – UAB LTG Link govt. – Government of the Republic of Lithuania LTG Infra – AB LTG Infra LTSA – Lithuanian Transport Safety Administration VLRD – UAB Vilniaus Lokomotyvų Remonto Depas EU – the European Union GTC – UAB Geležinkelio Tiesimo Centras SOE – State-owned enterprise The annual and interim reports and financial statements are publicly available on the Company’s websitehttps://www.litrail.lt . CEO foreword Dear employees, partners, customers, In reviewing the achievements of the LTG Group in 2020, I will not seem original by starting with the COVID-19 pandemic, which trembled the entire world, and its effects on the Group’s activity. -
The Election of John Paul II: the Reaction from Soviet Union
doi:10.15829/2686-973X-2021-4 The Election of John Paul II: the Reaction from Soviet Union Nadezhda A. Beliakova1, Viktor P. Bilotas2 This article presents a panorama of religious life of Catholics in the republics of the Soviet Union at the time of election by Pope John Paul II. The authors describe the relations of Soviet leadership with the Vatican and note the lack of strategic line at the international level. Attention is paid to the consolidated Catholic protest movement in the Soviet Union in the 1970s, regular criticism of Vatican Eastern politics and public organizations that put the discriminatory position of believers and churches on the public agenda. The article also describes the Soviet leadership’s efforts to consolidate Eastern European countries in relations with the Vatican and attempts to play on different political currents within the Catholic Church clergy. Key words: John Paul II, Karol Wojtyla, Catholics of the USSR, anti-Church policy in the USSR, relations between the Vatican and the USSR, Lithuania, Latvia, Ukraine. Relationships and Activities: none. 1Institute of World History of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia; 2Vytautas Magnus University, Kaunas, Lithuania. Nadezhda A. Beliakova*, PhD, Senior Research Fellow at Department of Modern and Contemporary History, ORCID: 0000-0003-0470-4497. Special interests — religion in the Cold war, lived religion in the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe, gender and religion in XX century. Viktor P. Bilotas, Church History licentiate, PhD student at Vytautas Magnus University, Faculty of Catholic Theology. ORCID: 0000-0002-6875-498X. Special interests — history of the Catholic Church, history of the Lithuanian Diaspora. -
Community Participation in Decision Making Processes in Urban Planning: the Case of Kaunas M.A
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE Journal of Contemporary Urban Affairs 2021, Volume 5, Number 2, pages 197– 208 Original scientific paper Community Participation in Decision Making Processes in Urban Planning: The Case of Kaunas M.A. Laura Jankauskaitė-Jurevičienė , Dr. Aušra Mlinkauskienė a and b Kaunas University of Technology, Civil engineering and architecture faculty, Kaunas, Lithuania Email 1: [email protected] , Email 2: [email protected] ARTICLE INFO: Article History: ABSTRACT Received 9 July 2020 Accepted 29 August 2020 Participation in decision-making processes foreshadows enabling citizens, Available online 18 September 2020 communities, non-governmental organizations and other interested parties to influence the formulation of policies and laws affecting them. The purpose of Keywords: this study is not only to review Lithuanian legal documents but also to analyse Community; recent processes in Kaunas city planning. Kaunas city is undergoing various Urban planning; urban processes, which do not always meet the needs of the community. This Spatial planning; study presents an analysis of the forms of community involvement in the urban Decision-making processes. planning processes and survey data on the effectiveness of community involvement. The methodology requires using a sociological survey with representatives of the city community and a comparative analysis between legal obligations and actual urbanization process. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY URBAN AFFAIRS (2021), 5(2), 197-208. https://doi.org/10.25034/ijcua.2021.v5n2-3 www.ijcua.com Copyright © 2020 Laura Jankauskaitė-Jurevičienė, Aušra Mlinkauskienė. -
Ab „Lietuvos Geležinkeliai“
AB LIETUVOS GELEŽINKELIAI ANNUAL REPORT FOR THE YEAR 2016 AB LIETUVOS GELEŽINKELIAI ANNUAL REPORT FOR THE YEAR 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS ...................................................................................... ERROR! BOOKMARK NOT DEFINED. MESSAGE OF THE DIRECTOR GENERAL ..................................................................................................................... 3 ABOUT THE GROUP AND THE COMPANY .................................................................................................................... 4 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE ................................................................. 5 STRATEGY ............................................................................................................................................................... 5 MOST SIGNIFICANT EVENTS IN 2016............................................................................................................................ 7 OVERVIEW OF THE COMPANY'S ACTIVITIES .............................................................................................................. 8 ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL AND OPERATIONAL PERFORMANCE ............................................................................. 12 ANALYSIS OF GROUP ACTIVITIES ...................................................................................................................... 12 OPERATIONAL PERFORMANCE OF THE GROUP COMPANIES ....................................................................... 15 INVESTMENTS -
1.3. Freight Traffic
ORGANISATION FOR CO-OPERATION BETWEEN RAILWAYS (OSJD) 1956-2021 Организация сотрудничества железных дорог (ОСЖД) 铁 路 合 作 组 织 (铁 组) Organisation für die Zusammenarbeit der Eisenbahnen (OSShD) R E P O R T ON THE ACTIVITIES OF THE ORGANISATION FOR CO-OPERATION BETWEEN RAILWAYS FOR 2020 Members of OSJD As of 1 August 2021 The Countries and Railways - Members of OSJD Countries Railways/Authorities Republic of Azerbaijan AZD - Azerbaijani Railways CJSC Republic of Albania Islamic Republic of Afghanistan ARA - Afghanistan Railway Authority (ARA) Republic of Belarus BC - Byelorussian Railway Republic of Bulgaria BDZ - Holding “Bulgarian State Railways” Hungary MAV - CJSC “Hungarian State Railways” Socialist Republic of Vietnam VZD - Vietnamese Railway State Company Georgia GR - “Georgian Railway” JSC Islamic Republic of Iran RAI - Railway of the Islamic Republic of Iran Republic of Kazakhstan KZH - JSC “Kazakhstan Temir Zholy National Company” (Railway of Kazakhstan) People’s Republic of China KZD - State Department for Railways / China State Railway Group Со., Ltd. Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK) ZC - Railways of the People's Democratic Republic of Korea Republic of Korea KORAIL - Korea Railroad Corporation Republic of Cuba Kyrgyz Republic KRG - “Kyrgyz Temir Zholy National Enterprise” State Company (Kyrgyz Railway) Republic of Latvia LDz - State JSC “Latvian Railway” (Latvijas dzelzceļš) Republic of Lithuania LTG - JSC “Lithuanian Railways” (AB “Lietuvos geležinkeliai“) Republic of Moldova CFM - State Enterprise “Railway of Moldova” -
Organisation for Co-Operation Between Railways (Osjd)
ORGANISATION FOR CO-OPERATION BETWEEN RAILWAYS (OSJD) Организация сотрудничества железных дорог (ОСЖД) 铁 路 合 作 组 织 (铁 组) Organisation für die Zusammenarbeit der Eisenbahnen (OSShD) R E P O R T ON THE ACTIVITIES OF THE ORGANISATION FOR CO-OPERATION BETWEEN RAILWAYS FOR 2019 Members of OSJD As of 30 September 2019 The Countries and Railways - Members of OSJD Countries Railways/Authorities Republic of Azerbaijan AZD - Azerbaijani Railways CJSC Republic of Albania Islamic Republic of Afghanistan ARA - Afghanistan Railway Authority (ARA) Republic of Belarus BC - Byelorussian Railway Republic of Bulgaria BDZ - Holding “Bulgarian State Railways” Hungary MAV - CJSC “Hungarian State Railways” Socialist Republic of Vietnam VZD - Vietnamese Railway State Company Georgia GR - “Georgian Railway” JSC Islamic Republic of Iran RAI - Railway of the Islamic Republic of Iran Republic of Kazakhstan KZH - JSC “Kazakhstan Temir Zholy National Company” (Railway of Kazakhstan) People’s Republic of China KZD - State Department for Railways / China State Railway Group Со., Ltd. Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK) ZC - Railways of the People's Democratic Republic of Korea Republic of Korea KORAIL - Korea Railroad Corporation Republic of Cuba Kyrgyz Republic KRG - “Kyrgyz Temir Zholy National Enterprise” State Company (Kyrgyz Railway) Republic of Latvia LDZ - State JSC “Latvian Railway” (Latvijas dzelzceļš) Republic of Lithuania LTG - JSC “Lithuanian Railways” (AB “Lietuvos geležinkeliai“) Republic of Moldova CFM - State Enterprise “Railway of Moldova” Mongolia -
Network Statement
APPROVED BY Order No. ĮS-PAJ(LGI)-100 February the 24th of 2021 of CEO of AB LTG Infra NETWORK STATEMENT OF TRAIN WORKING TIMETABLE OF PUBLIC RAILWAY INFRASTRUCTURE FOR THE YEAR 2021-2022 2020 Vilnius 1 Document version (to be filled from 12 December 2020) Date Version No. Description of updates According to the obligations of an order of January the 6th of 2021 of the Director of the Communications Regulatory Authority of the Republic of Lithuania No. (1.9E)1V-7 Item 4.7.1 of the Network Statement has been repealed, Item 4.7.3.1 has been reworded as 24/02/2021 1 follows: “4.7.2.1. the public railway infrastructure manager must inform the applicant thereof in writing or by electronic means no later than the next working day from the occurrence of such circumstances." 2 CONTENTS 1. GENERAL INFORMATION ..................................................................................................................... 8 1.1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 8 1.2. Objective of the Network Statement ....................................................................................... 8 1.3. Legal framework ...................................................................................................................... 8 1.4. Legal status .............................................................................................................................. 8 1.4.1. General remarks .......................................................................................................................