DOCSLIB.ORG

Sussex by the Sea: a Descriptive Analysis of Dialect Variation in the South East of England Based on English Dialect App Data

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Sussex by the sea: a descriptive analysis of dialect variation in the South East of England based on English Dialect App data Article (Published Version) Jansen, Sandra, Robinson, Justyna A, Cahill, Lynne, Leemann, Adrian, Blaxter, Tamsin and Britain, David (2020) Sussex by the sea: a descriptive analysis of dialect variation in the South East of England based on English Dialect App data. English Today, 36 (3). pp. 31-39. ISSN 0266- 0784 This version is available from Sussex Research Online: http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/id/eprint/93516/ This document is made available in accordance with publisher policies and may differ from the published version or from the version of record. If you wish to cite this item you are advised to consult the publisher’s version. Please see the URL above for details on accessing the published version. Copyright and reuse: Sussex Research Online is a digital repository of the research output of the University. Copyright and all moral rights to the version of the paper presented here belong to the individual author(s) and/or other copyright owners. To the extent reasonable and practicable, the material made available in SRO has been checked for eligibility before being made available. Copies of full text items generally can be reproduced, displayed or performed and given to third parties in any format or medium for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-profit purposes without prior permission or charge, provided that the authors, title and full bibliographic details are credited, a hyperlink and/or URL is given for the original metadata page and the content is not changed in any way. http://sro.sussex.ac.uk Sussex by the sea SANDRA JANSEN , JUSTYNA A. ROBINSON, LYNNE CAHILL, ADRIAN LEEMANN, TAMSIN BLAXTER AND DAVID BRITAIN A descriptive analysis of dialect variation in the South East of England based on English Dialect App data 1. Introduction Sandra Jansen is a Senior Dialects in the South East of England are very Lecturer in English linguistics at the University often perceived as one homogenous mass, without of Paderborn, Germany. Her much regional variation. Rosewarne introduced the research focuses on notion of Estuary English and defined it as ‘variety language variation and of modified regional speech [ . ] a mixture of change, Cumbrian English, non-regional and local south-eastern English pro- sociophonetics and variation nunciation and intonation’ (Rosewarne, 1984). in production and perception of L2 varieties of English. However, studies such as Przedlacka (2001) and Recently, she edited a volume on Sociolinguistics in Torgersen & Kerswill (2004) have shown that, at England (Palgrave; with Natalie Braber) and a least on the phonetic level, distinct varieties exist. volume on Processes of Change. Studies in Late Nevertheless, very few studies have investigated Modern and Present-Day English (John Benjamins; language use in the South East and even fewer in with Lucia Siebers). Email: sandra.jansen@ the county of Sussex. It is often claimed that there unipaderborn.de is no distinct Sussex dialect (Coates, 2010: 29). Even in the earliest works describing the dialect Justyna A. Robinson is a Senior Lecturer in English of the area (Wright, 1903) there are suggestions Language and Linguistics at that it cannot be distinguished from Hampshire in the University of Sussex, the west and Kent in the east. United Kingdom. Her Only two recent studies of accent and dialect use research focuses on semantic in Sussex are known to the authors. Coates (2010) variation and change, is based on Survey of English Dialects (SED) data sociolinguistics, cognitive linguistics, corpus linguistics to provide an insight into dialect use in Sussex in th and how these interact. Her the middle of the 20 century. The data is quite recent work on a collaborative AHRC-funded project limited in that mainly non-mobile older rural ‘Linguistic DNA. Modelling concepts and semantic males (NORMS; Chambers & Trudgill, 1998) change’ is available here https://www.linguisticdna. were recorded. The aim of the study was to pre- org/. Email: [email protected] serve a record of ‘traditional dialect, genuine and old’ (Orton, 1960: 332). Lynne Cahill is a Senior Lecturer in English A more recent study investigates the process of Language and Linguistics at regional dialect levelling in Hastings, a town in the the University of Sussex. Her east of Sussex (Holmes–Elliott, 2015). Holmes– previous work mostly Elliott uses a language variation and change frame- focusses on lexical work to study changes in the GOOSE and MOUTH representation of vowels and in the use of /θ/. While changes morphology and phonology and the connections between in the MOUTH vowel are described for different orthography, phonology and parts of the South East (Kerswill & Williams, doi:10.1017/S0266078420000218 English Today 143, Vol. 36, No. 3 (September 2020). Printed in the United Kingdom © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University DownloadedPress. from This https://www.cambridge.org/core is an Open Access article, distributed. IP address: under the82.27.86.76 terms of the, on Creative 03 Sep 2020 Commons at 14:55:04 Attribution, subject licence to the (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/termsby/4.0/), which permits unrestricted. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266078420000218 re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 31 morphology. In recent years she has focused on the Adrian Leemann did his PhD relationship between spelling and pronunciation, in 2009 at the University of with a particular interest in variant spellings in Bern on the Intonation of contexts as diverse as medieval legal documents Swiss German dialects. As a and computer mediated communication. She has postdoc, he worked on a worked on accent change alongside students, number of projects in including a study of the diphthongs in Mick forensic phonetics and Jagger’s speech over 50 years. She is the author dialectology at the of the textbook Discovering Phonetics and Universities of Zurich and Phonology and has been a Sussex resident for Cambridge. During this time, – – nearly 40 years. he with various teams developed dialect apps for typologically diverse languages. In 2017 he was appointed Assistant Professor of Sociolinguistics at David Britain has been Lancaster University. Since September 2019 he has Professor of Modern English his own research group at the University of Bern, Linguistics at the University investigating language variation and change in of Bern in Switzerland since German-speaking Switzerland. 2010, having previously worked in New Zealand and the UK. His research interests embrace language 2005; Holmes–Elliott, 2015), TH-fronting along variation and change, with L-vocalisation and T-glottalling have been varieties of English identified as features which are diffusing across (especially in Southern England, the Southern the country (cf. Torgersen, 1997; Britain, 2009; Hemisphere and the Pacific), dialect contact and Flynn, 2012; Jansen, 2018). attrition, dialect ideologies, and the dialectology- human geography interface, especially with respect In this paper we present a recent description of to space/place, urban/rural and the role of features and variation as found in the county of mobilities. He is co-author (with Laura Rupp) of Sussex. Based on English Dialect App Corpus Linguistic perspectives on a Variable English (EDAC) data (Leemann, Kolly & Britain, 2018), Morpheme: Let’s Talk about –s (Palgrave, 2019), we provide information about the geographical editor of Language in the British Isles (Cambridge distribution of dialect features across the county, University Press, 2007), co-editor (with Jenny divided into coastal and inland regions, urban and Cheshire) of Social Dialectology (Benjamin, 2003), and co-author of Linguistics: An Introduction rural areas, main administrative centre and other (with Andrew Radford, Martin Atkinson, Harald areas and East Sussex vs West Sussex vs Mid Clahsen and Andrew Spencer) (Cambridge Sussex. In many cases we also include information University Press, 2nd edn., 2009). David was about the use of features by age group as this can be Associate Editor of the Journal of Sociolinguistics an indicator for change. between 2008 and 2017. 2. Sussex Tamsin Blaxter did her BA Linguistics at the University Sussex is situated in the South East of England, of Essex, MPhil General stretching along the south coast from Chichester Linguistics and Comparative in the west to Rye in the east and reaching north Philology at the University of to Crawley. The area known as Sussex also Oxford, and her PhD in includes the unitary authority of Brighton and Linguistics at the University of Cambridge. Her PhD used Hove. In 1974 the county was divided into the spatial evidence to explore two administrative parts, East and West Sussex. the role of contact in The area traditionally had a largely rural popula- simplificatory change in the history of Norwegian. tion. The south-coast towns developed as tourist She is currently undertaking a Research Fellowship centres after the Prince Regent, later King George at Gonville & Caius College. Her research interests IV, adopted Brighton as his holiday home in the include spatial aspects of language change and language variation, mathematical models of 1820s and tourism is now a significant source of change, Scandinavian historical linguistics, and employment in these towns. During the second th English dialectology. half of the 20 century the area began to attract workers in the service industries, so that by 2011, 32 Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 82.27.86.76, on 03 Sep 2020 at 14:55:04, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266078420000218 ethnicity and place of residence. Table 1 provides Table 1: Age group distribution and number of participants per age group the overall distribution of the participants by age group.
Recommended publications
  • Landscape Character Types

    Landscape Character Types

    Acknowledgements The authors wish to express their gratitude to the various people and organisations that have assisted with the preparation of this landscape character assessment. Particular thanks are due to the members of the Steering Group at Findon Council, Peter Kirk, and Richard Bell. We are grateful for permission to include material from the South Downs National Park Geographic information System (GIS), and our thanks are due to colleagues at South Coast GIS (Paul Day and Matt Powell) who have assisted with this element of the project. Findon Parish Council would also like to gratefully acknowledge the financial assistance from the South Downs National Park Authority, provided to support the preparation of the neighbourhood plan. This study included two workshop sessions, and we are very grateful to the representatives of the Parish Council and neighbourhood planning group who gave up their time to attend the workshops and make helpful comments on the drafts of the study. We have endeavoured to faithfully include relevant suggestions and information, but apologise if we have failed to include all suggestions. The copyright of the illustrations reproduced from other sources is gratefully acknowledged; these are either the British Library (figure 8 ) or Bury Art Museum (figure 10). Whilst we acknowledge the assistance of other people and organisations, this report represents the views of David Hares Landscape Architecture alone. David Hares Lynnette Leeson April 2014 "Landscape means an area, as perceived by people, whose character is the result of the action and interaction of natural and/or human factors." (European Landscape Convention, 2000) 1 CONTENTS 1.
  • The South East © I-Stock Introduction What Does England Mean to You?

    The South East © I-Stock Introduction What Does England Mean to You?

    Our changing climate, our changing lives The South East © i-Stock Introduction What does England mean to you? Is it village greens, country gardens, The year 2007 saw sunbathers flocking to the song thrushes, the oak tree, carpets beaches in the hottest April on record, quickly of bluebells, ancient woodland, followed by flash flooding in June that destroyed 1 primroses and hedgehogs – thousands of homes and killed 11 people . or our bustling towns and cities? In 2008 we witnessed the warmest two January days ever. The weather is changing. Scientists Is it apple orchards, local spuds, around the world and the three main UK political rhubarb crumble, roast beef and parties all agree that this climate change is largely fish ’n’ chips? Or golf courses, your the result of human activity. They also agree that allotment, fishing, the Six Nations any increase in the global average temperature and the Ashes? above 2°C will be catastrophic for our way of life. To try and prevent any temperature rise above Or is it simply home? 2°C, all the world’s wealthy countries will have to Whatever it means to you, the cut their carbon emissions (the main cause of England we know and love is in peril climate change) by at least 80% by 2050. owing to climate change. So, as climate change causes the Arctic ice cap to melt and threatens over a quarter of the world’s wildlife with extinction, what does Baldock Bletchley Letchworth Toddington Thaxted Halstead Winslow Hitchin Harwich this all mean closer to home? Chipping Norton Leighton Buzzard Stevenage Stanstead
  • Iconic Bees: 12 Reports on UK Bee Species

    Iconic Bees: 12 Reports on UK Bee Species

    Iconic Bees: 12 reports on UK bee species Bees are vital to the ecology of the UK and provide significant social and economic benefits through crop pollination and maintaining the character of the landscape. Recent years have seen substantial declines in many species of bees within the UK. This report takes a closer look at how 12 ‘iconic’ bee species are faring in each English region, as well as Wales, Northern Ireland and Scotland. Authors Rebecca L. Evans and Simon G. Potts, University of Reading. Photo: © Amelia Collins Contents 1 Summary 2 East England Sea-aster Mining Bee 6 East Midlands Large Garden Bumblebee 10 London Buff-tailed Bumblebee 14 North East Bilberry Bumblebee 18 North West Wall Mason Bee 22 Northern Ireland Northern Colletes 26 Scotland Great Yellow Bumblebee 30 South East England Potter Flower Bee 34 South West England Scabious Bee 38 Wales Large Mason Bee 42 West Midlands Long-horned Bee 46 Yorkshire Tormentil Mining Bee Through collating information on the 12 iconic bee species, common themes have Summary emerged on the causes of decline, and the actions that can be taken to help reverse it. The most pervasive causes of bee species decline are to be found in the way our countryside has changed in the past 60 years. Intensification of grazing regimes, an increase in pesticide use, loss of biodiverse field margins and hedgerows, the trend towards sterile monoculture, insensitive development and the sprawl of towns and cities are the main factors in this. I agree with the need for a comprehensive Bee Action Plan led by the UK Government in order to counteract these causes of decline, as called for by Friends of the Earth.
  • THE COASTAL COMMUNITIES of SOUTH EAST ENGLAND Recommendations to the South East

    THE COASTAL COMMUNITIES of SOUTH EAST ENGLAND Recommendations to the South East

    THE COASTAL COMMUNITIES OF SOUTH EAST ENGLAND Recommendations to the South East LEP Prof Steve Fothergill Centre for Regional Economic and Social Research Sheffield Hallam University Final report December 2012 1 Summary This report considers the policy implications arising from a statistical review of the South East’s coastal communities, completed in April 2012. It also builds on discussions involving coastal local authorities, private sector representatives and other local partners. The statistical review identified the South East’s coastal communities, which have a combined population of one million or around a quarter of the LEP total, as on average an area of social and economic disadvantage, well adrift of LEP averages and sometimes behind national averages as well. The review also flagged up important differences between places along the coast and put forward a six-fold classification of areas that has won wide support. The present report makes ten recommendations: 1. The South East LEP needs to be ‘spatially aware’. The big internal differences within the LEP area, and in particular the distinctive needs of the coastal strip, need to inform the full range of LEP activities. 2. Strategic plans and priorities should give special attention to the coastal strip. This includes in the allocation of resources. 3. Transport links to parts of the coast need improvement. Accessibility remains an important constraint in a number of local areas. 4. The seaside tourist industry should be treated as one of the drivers of economic growth. Tourism along the coast continues to employ as many people as manufacturing, and there are opportunities for growth.
  • Segmental Phonology and the Perception of Syntactic Structure

    Segmental Phonology and the Perception of Syntactic Structure

    JOURNAL OF VERBAL LEARNING AND VERBAL BEHAVIOR 23, 450-466 (1984) Segmental Phonology and the Perception of Syntactic Structure DONIA R. SCOTT University of Sussex AND ANNE CUTLER MRC Applied Psychology Unit, Cambridge Recent research in speech production has shown that syntactic structure is reflected in segmental phonology--the application of certain phonological rules of English (e.g., pala- talization and alveolar flapping) is inhibited across phrase boundaries. We examined whether such segmental effects can be used in speech perception as cues to syntactic structure, and the relation between the use of these segmental features as syntactic markers in production and perception. Speakers of American English (a dialect in which the above segmental effects occur) could indeed use the segmental cues in syntax perception; speakers of British English (in which the effects do not occur) were unable to make use of them, while speakers of British English who were long-term residents of the United States showed intermediate performance. Anyone who has had to make the sepa- dangerous") (Lehiste, 1973). But the fact rate meanings of an ambiguous sentence that listeners can successfully identify the clear to listeners will know that often the intended meaning even in the absence of a most efficient method is just to say the sen- disambiguating context suggests that tence in different ways. Of course, some speakers can exploit acoustic features to sentences will be more difficult to disam- highlight the distinction that is to be con- biguate in this manner than others; in gen- veyed to the listener. eral, surface structure ambiguities (e.g., In recent years, a number of studies on "The old men and women stayed at English speech perception have investi- home") prove easier than deep structure gated just what these acoustic correlates of ambiguities (e.g., "Flying planes can be syntactic structure are, and how useful they are to the listener.
  • West Midlands European Regional Development Fund Operational Programme

    West Midlands European Regional Development Fund Operational Programme

    Regional Competitiveness and Employment Objective 2007 – 2013 West Midlands European Regional Development Fund Operational Programme Version 3 July 2012 CONTENTS 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 – 5 2a SOCIO-ECONOMIC ANALYSIS - ORIGINAL 2.1 Summary of Eligible Area - Strengths and Challenges 6 – 14 2.2 Employment 15 – 19 2.3 Competition 20 – 27 2.4 Enterprise 28 – 32 2.5 Innovation 33 – 37 2.6 Investment 38 – 42 2.7 Skills 43 – 47 2.8 Environment and Attractiveness 48 – 50 2.9 Rural 51 – 54 2.10 Urban 55 – 58 2.11 Lessons Learnt 59 – 64 2.12 SWOT Analysis 65 – 70 2b SOCIO-ECONOMIC ANALYSIS – UPDATED 2010 2.1 Summary of Eligible Area - Strengths and Challenges 71 – 83 2.2 Employment 83 – 87 2.3 Competition 88 – 95 2.4 Enterprise 96 – 100 2.5 Innovation 101 – 105 2.6 Investment 106 – 111 2.7 Skills 112 – 119 2.8 Environment and Attractiveness 120 – 122 2.9 Rural 123 – 126 2.10 Urban 127 – 130 2.11 Lessons Learnt 131 – 136 2.12 SWOT Analysis 137 - 142 3 STRATEGY 3.1 Challenges 143 - 145 3.2 Policy Context 145 - 149 3.3 Priorities for Action 150 - 164 3.4 Process for Chosen Strategy 165 3.5 Alignment with the Main Strategies of the West 165 - 166 Midlands 3.6 Development of the West Midlands Economic 166 Strategy 3.7 Strategic Environmental Assessment 166 - 167 3.8 Lisbon Earmarking 167 3.9 Lisbon Agenda and the Lisbon National Reform 167 Programme 3.10 Partnership Involvement 167 3.11 Additionality 167 - 168 4 PRIORITY AXES Priority 1 – Promoting Innovation and Research and Development 4.1 Rationale and Objective 169 - 170 4.2 Description of Activities
  • Imperceptible Incomplete Neutralization

    Imperceptible Incomplete Neutralization

    Available online at www.sciencedirect.com ScienceDirect Lingua 152 (2014) 24--44 www.elsevier.com/locate/lingua Imperceptible incomplete neutralization: Production, non-identifiability, and non-discriminability in American English flapping Aaron Braver * Texas Tech University, Department of English, P.O. Box 43091, Lubbock, TX 79409-3091, United States Received 1 November 2012; received in revised form 6 September 2014; accepted 9 September 2014 Available online Abstract Flapping in American English has been put forward as a case of incomplete neutralization---in other words, /d/-flaps and /t/-flaps differ at the phonetic level. This paper first presents a production experiment which shows that, in line with previous work, flapping in American English is incompletely neutralizing: vowels before /d/-flaps are slightly longer than those before /t/-flaps---even in nonce words. Early studies on the perceptibility of this difference, almost exclusively identification tasks, have shown mixed results. However, recent identification experiments (including one reported here) show that listeners are unable to properly categorize /d/- and /t/-flaps. Listeners’ poor performance on identification tasks can be due to two factors: either (a) listeners’ grammars lacking the relevant phonological categories, or (b) an effect of the type of perception tasks employed. In a 2AFC discrimination task presented here, listeners were unable to distinguish between /d/- and /t/-flaps, suggesting that poor perception performance generalizes to multiple task types. © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Keywords: Incomplete neutralization; Flapping; Phonetics; American English 1. Introduction In American English flapping, underlying /d/ and /t/ become [ɾ] in certain prosodic configurations (e.g., Kahn, 1980).
  • Ling 230/503: Articulatory Phonetics and Transcription English Vowels

    Ling 230/503: Articulatory Phonetics and Transcription English Vowels

    Ling 230/503: Articulatory Phonetics and Transcription Broad vs. narrow transcription. A narrow transcription is one in which the transcriber records much phonetic detail without attention to the way in which the sounds of the language form a system. A broad transcription omits those details of a narrow transcription which the transcriber feels are not worth recording. Normally these details will be aspects of the speech event which are: (1) predictable or (2) would not differentiate two token utterances of the same type in the judgment of speakers or (3) are presumed not to figure in the systematic phonology of the language. IPA vs. American transcription There are two commonly used systems of phonetic transcription, the International Phonetics Association or IPA system and the American system. In many cases these systems overlap, but in certain cases there are important distinctions. Students need to learn both systems and have to be flexible about the use of symbols. English Vowels Short vowels /ɪ ɛ æ ʊ ʌ ɝ/ ‘pit’ pɪt ‘put’ pʊt ‘pet’ pɛt ‘putt’ pʌt ‘pat’ pæt ‘pert’ pɝt (or pr̩t) Long vowels /i(ː), u(ː), ɑ(ː), ɔ(ː)/ ‘beat’ biːt (or bit) ‘boot’ buːt (or but) ‘(ro)bot’ bɑːt (or bɑt) ‘bought’ bɔːt (or bɔt) Diphthongs /eɪ, aɪ, aʊ, oʊ, ɔɪ, ju(ː)/ ‘bait’ beɪt ‘boat’ boʊt ‘bite’ bɑɪt (or baɪt) ‘bout’ bɑʊt (or baʊt) ‘Boyd’ bɔɪd (or boɪd) ‘cute’ kjuːt (or kjut) The property of length, denoted by [ː], can be predicted based on the quality of the vowel. For this reason it is quite common to omit the length mark [ː].
  • 54880 Shripney Road Bognor.Pdf

    54880 Shripney Road Bognor.Pdf

    LEC Refrigeration Site, Shripney Rd Bognor Regis, West Sussex Archaeological Desk-Based Assessment Ref: 54880.01 esxArchaeologyWessex November 2003 LEC Refrigeration Site, Shripney Road, Bognor Regis, West Sussex Archaeological Desk-based Assessment Prepared on behalf of ENVIRON UK 5 Stratford Place London W1C 1AU By Wessex Archaeology (London) Unit 701 The Chandlery 50 Westminster Bridge Road London SE1 7QY Report reference: 54880.01 November 2003 © The Trust for Wessex Archaeology Limited 2003 all rights reserved The Trust for Wessex Archaeology Limited is a Registered Charity No. 287786 LEC Refrigeration Site, Shripney Road, Bognor Regis, West Sussex Archaeological Desk-based Assessment Contents 1 INTRODUCTION ...............................................................................................1 1.1 Project Background...................................................................................1 1.2 The Site........................................................................................................1 1.3 Geology........................................................................................................2 1.4 Hydrography ..............................................................................................2 1.5 Site visit.......................................................................................................2 1.6 Archaeological and Historical Background.............................................2 2 PLANNING AND LEGISLATIVE BACKGROUND .....................................8
  • Underground Sussex Growing the Value of Tourism in West Sussex

    Underground Sussex Growing the Value of Tourism in West Sussex

    Underground Sussex Growing the value of tourism in West Sussex A report identifying options for delivering tourism growth through collaboration for the Coastal West Sussex Partnership Underground Sussex Growing the value of tourism in West Sussex 1 Executive Summary The areas covered by Coastal West Sussex (CWS) are tourism destinations with a positive future. They hold assets that tourists believe to be great and there is a rich variety of events, festivals, attractions and experiences that are highly valued by visitors from around the UK and overseas. However they could and should do better. Their rich natural and cultural assets and their proximity to London and the South East, mean there is potential for tourism to grow further, contributing more jobs and greater economic impact to the Coastal West Sussex area. Local partners should aim for tourism growth in the Coastal West Sussex area to exceed that expected in the UK over the next four years. This should be done by generating new demand and creating year- round visitor flows, reducing the seasonal imbalance that currently restricts growth in the local visitor economy. A summary vision for the partnership could be ‘Driving more staying visitors to explore Coastal West Sussex throughout the year’. This growth should be achieved through changes to the pattern of tourism that include: • Converting day to staying visitors; • Delivering higher yield business tourism; • Achieving a better seasonal balance of business; • Establishing events to plug seasonal gaps; • Focusing on higher socio-economic groups from source markets; and • Attracting more international visitors (day from London as well as staying).
  • An Acoustic Account of the Allophonic Realization of /T/ Amber King St

    An Acoustic Account of the Allophonic Realization of /T/ Amber King St

    Linguistic Portfolios Volume 1 Article 12 2012 An Acoustic Account of the Allophonic Realization of /T/ Amber King St. Cloud State University Ettien Koffi St. Cloud State University Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.stcloudstate.edu/stcloud_ling Part of the Applied Linguistics Commons Recommended Citation King, Amber and Koffi, Ettien (2012) "An Acoustic Account of the Allophonic Realization of /T/," Linguistic Portfolios: Vol. 1 , Article 12. Available at: https://repository.stcloudstate.edu/stcloud_ling/vol1/iss1/12 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by theRepository at St. Cloud State. It has been accepted for inclusion in Linguistic Portfolios by an authorized editor of theRepository at St. Cloud State. For more information, please contact [email protected]. King and Koffi: An Acoustic Account of the Allophonic Realization of /T/ AN ACOUSTIC ACCOUNT OF THE ALLOPHONIC REALIZATIONS OF /T/ AMBER KING AND ETTIEN KOFFI 1.0 Introduction This paper is a laboratory phonology account of the different pronunciations of the phoneme /t/. Laboratory phonology is a relatively new analytical tool that is being used to validate and verify claims made by phonologists about the pronunciation of sounds. It is customary for phonologists to predict on the basis of auditory impressions and intuition alone that allophones exist for such and such phonemes. An allophone is defined as different realizations of the same phoneme based on the environments in which it occurs. For instance, it has been proposed that the phoneme /t/ has anywhere from four to eight allophones in General American English (GAE). To verify this claim Amber, one of the co-author of this paper recorded herself saying the words <still>, <Tim>, <kit>, <bitter>, <kitten>, <winter>, <fruition>, <furniture>, and <listen>.
  • UC Berkeley Phonlab Annual Report

    UC Berkeley Phonlab Annual Report

    UC Berkeley UC Berkeley PhonLab Annual Report Title Strengthening, Weakening and Variability: The Articulatory Correlates of Hypo- and Hyper- articulation in the Production of English Dental Fricatives Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1hw2719n Journal UC Berkeley PhonLab Annual Report, 14(1) ISSN 2768-5047 Author Melguy, Yevgeniy Publication Date 2018 DOI 10.5070/P7141042482 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California UC Berkeley Phonetics and Phonology Lab Annual Report (2018) Yevgeniy Melguy Susan Lin, Brian Smith M.A. Qualifying Paper 9 December 2018 Strengthening, weakening and variability: The articulatory correlates of hypo- and hyper- articulation in the production of English dental fricatives 1. INTRODUCTION A number of influential approaches to understanding phonetic and phonological variation in speech have highlighted the importance of functional factors (Blevins, 2004; Donegan & Stampe, 1979; Kiparsky, 1988; Kirchner, 1998; Lindblom, 1990). Under such approaches, speaker- and listener-oriented principles—ease of articulation vs. perceptual clarity—often work in opposite directions with respect to consonantal articulation. Minimization of effort is thought to drive a general “weakening” of consonants (resulting in decreased articulatory constriction and/or duration) which often makes them more articulatorily similar to surrounding sounds. This can result in assimilation, lenition, and ultimately deletion, and generally comes at the expense of clarity. By contrast, maximization of clarity drives consonantal “strengthening” processes (resulting in increased articulatory constriction and/or duration) that makes target segments more distinct from neighboring sounds, which can result in fortition. Clear speech generally involves more extreme or “forceful” articulations, and usually comes at the expense of requiring more articulatory effort from the speaker.