DOCSLIB.ORG

Case Study Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Case Study Report EUBORDERREGIONS FP7 RESEARCH PROJECT CASE STUDY #1 NORWAY - RUSSIA Case Study Report Elaborated by The Barents Institute Team UIT The Arctic University of Norway 1 Table of Contents 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 4 1.1 The border, the border region and the border traffic zone ............................................................. 4 1.2 Data material and network analysis ................................................................................................. 5 1.3 Historical background ....................................................................................................................... 8 1.4 The impact of the past on current cross-border relations ............................................................. 10 1.5 Minorities and their impact on current cross-border relations ..................................................... 11 2. Socio-economic characteristics ................................................................................................... 13 2.1 Finnmark County ............................................................................................................................. 13 2.2 Murmansk Region ........................................................................................................................... 14 2.3 Regional indicators compared to national indicators ..................................................................... 16 2.4 Differences between the Norwegian and Russian parts of the border region ............................... 18 2.5 Socio-economic characteristics affecting cross-border cooperation ............................................. 19 3. Cross-border transport and infrastructure ................................................................................... 21 3.1 The border crossing point of Storskog-Borisoglebsky .................................................................... 21 3.2 Border crossings through Storskog-Borisoglebsky ......................................................................... 23 3.3 Treatment of travellers crossing the border at Storskog-Borisoglebsky ........................................ 25 3.4 Air, sea and rail traffic ..................................................................................................................... 25 3.5 Infrastructure .................................................................................................................................. 26 4. The visa regime and the border traffic permit ............................................................................. 27 4.1 The visa regime ............................................................................................................................... 27 4.2 The border traffic permit ................................................................................................................ 28 5. Bilateral and regional cooperation .............................................................................................. 32 5.1 Economy ......................................................................................................................................... 32 5.2 Culture and art ................................................................................................................................ 33 5.3 Environment ................................................................................................................................... 33 5.4 Safety and security.......................................................................................................................... 34 5.5 International context for cooperation ............................................................................................ 35 5.6 Cooperation on the regional level .................................................................................................. 36 6. Municipal cooperation: The case of Sør-Varanger and Pechenga ................................................. 37 6.1 Twin towns ...................................................................................................................................... 37 6.2 The cooperation between the municipal administrations ............................................................. 38 6.3 Health and care ............................................................................................................................... 39 6.4 Education ........................................................................................................................................ 40 6.5 Sport................................................................................................................................................ 42 6.6 Libraries .......................................................................................................................................... 43 6.7 Media .............................................................................................................................................. 44 6.8 Business and labour ........................................................................................................................ 44 6.9 Obstacles for municipal cross-border cooperation ........................................................................ 45 7. Cross-border cooperation between organizations and institutions............................................... 47 7.1 Educational cross-border cooperation ........................................................................................... 47 7.2 Cultural cross-border cooperation ................................................................................................ 47 7.3 Cross-border cooperation between non-governmental organizations ......................................... 48 7.4 Motivating factors .......................................................................................................................... 48 7.5 Obstacles ....................................................................................................................................... 49 2 8. Economic relations ..................................................................................................................... 51 8.1 Economic relations between Norway and Russia ........................................................................... 51 8.2 Economic relations in the border region ........................................................................................ 52 8.3 Informal and illegal trade in the border region .............................................................................. 53 8.4 The labour market .......................................................................................................................... 53 8.5 Tourism ........................................................................................................................................... 54 8.6 Fisheries and hydroenergy – two success stories ........................................................................... 56 8.7 Barriers for economic cross-border cooperation ........................................................................... 57 8.8 The future for economic cross-border cooperation ....................................................................... 58 9. Perceptions of the border, the border location and regional development ................................... 60 10. The role of the European Union in the borderland ....................................................................... 62 11. Policy options ............................................................................................................................. 64 12. References ................................................................................................................................. 66 3 1. Introduction This case study report forms part of the research project European Regions, EU External Borders and the Immediate Neighbours. Analysing Regional Development Options through Policies and Practices of Cross-Border Co-operation (EUBORDERREGIONS). The main objective of the project is to identify challenges to economic, social, and territorial cohesion as well as regional development potentials in different borderlands at the EU’s external frontiers.1 The report examines cross-border cooperation (hereinafter referred to as CBC) in the Russian- Norwegian borderland in the far north of Europe. Although the Russian-Norwegian border is formally not an EU border, it shares in many ways the characteristics of the eastern external EU border further south. Although not a member of the union, Norway is to a large extent integrated in the EU community through its membership in the European Economic Area. Importantly, Norway has been a member of the Schengen since 2001. 1.1 The border, the border region and the border traffic zone The Russian- Norwegian border was established in 1826. The border is 196 kilometres long. The biggest part of it (153 kilometres) follows rivers and lakes. The border can only be crossed at one point, the Storskog-Borisoglebsky border-crossing. Visa, or border traffic permit for border residents, is required for travellers crossing the border from either side. The Russian-Norwegian border region is in our research defined as Finnmark County (Norwegian: Finnmark fylke) (48.637 km2/
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Right of Persons Employed in Polish Public Services to Association in Trade Unions
    Studia z Zakresu Prawa Pracy i Polityki Społecznej Studies on Labour Law and Social Policy 2020, 27, nr 1: 23–27 doi:10.4467/25444654SPP.20.003.11719 www.ejournals.eu/sppips Krzysztof Baran https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5165-8265 Jagiellonian University THE RIGHT OF PERSONS EMPLOYED IN POLISH PUBLIC SERVICES TO ASSOCIATION IN TRADE UNIONS Abstract The article aims at presenting the reconsidered model of association of public servants under the Polish legal system. In the past, there was a statutory imposed limiting monism in the trade union movement of military services officers. Since 2019 trade union pluralism has been introduced for the Police, Border Guard, and Prison Service officers, which is analyzed in the paper. Another issue discussed in this article is the right of association of persons employed in civil public administration. Słowa kluczowe: związek zawodowy, służby mundurowe, straż graniczna, policja, służba więzienna Keywords: trade union, public services, Border Guard, Police, Prison Service ASJC: 3308, JEL: K31 On 19 July 2019, the Parliament of the Republic of Poland adopted the Act extending the right of officers of the Police, Border Guard and Prison Services to form and join trade unions (Dz.U. 2019, item 1608). The newly adopted regulation is an inspiration to recon- sider the model of association of public servants under the Polish legal system. The term “public servants” or “those employed in public services” refers not only to those employed in widely understood public administration, but also those serving in military services. The starting point for further discussion will be the statement that persons who are employed in Polish public service structures perform work under various legal regimes, starting from labour law, through civil law to administrative law.
    [Show full text]
  • Trafficking in Human Beings
    TemaNord 2014:526 TemaNord Ved Stranden 18 DK-1061 Copenhagen K www.norden.org Trafficking in Human Beings Report from a conference on Identification of victims and criminals Trafficking in Human Beings – why we do not notice them In the Nordic countries, most of the reported cases of trafficking in human beings today concern women and girls trafficked for sexual exploitation, but experiences from Europe indicate that human trafficking has increased also in farming, household work, construction, and house building, as well as in begging, shoplifting and thefts. The conference Identification of victims and criminals – why we do not notice them on 30–31 May 2013 in Tallinn, Estonia formed the conclusion of a Nordic-Baltic-Northwest Russian cooperation project. Around 80 participants attended the two-day conference to discuss ways of identifying victims and criminals and to find answer to the question of why we do not notice victims or criminals, even though we now have available to us facts, figures, research and knowledge about human trafficking as a part of international organized crime. TemaNord 2014:526 ISBN 978-92-893-2767-1 ISBN 978-92-893-2768-8 (EPUB) ISSN 0908-6692 conference proceeding TN2014526 omslag.indd 1 09-04-2014 07:18:39 Trafficking in Human Beings Report from a conference on Identification of victims and criminals – why we do not notice them TemaNord 2014:526 Trafficking in Human Beings Report from a conference on Identification of victims and criminals - why we do not notice them ISBN 978-92-893-2767-1 ISBN 978-92-893-2768-8 (EPUB) http://dx.doi.org/10.6027/TN2014-526 TemaNord 2014:526 ISSN 0908-6692 © Nordic Council of Ministers 2014 Layout: Hanne Lebech Cover photo: Beate Nøsterud Photo: Reelika Riimand Print: Rosendahls-Schultz Grafisk Copies: 516 Printed in Denmark This publication has been published with financial support by the Nordic Council of Ministers.
    [Show full text]
  • Some Facts About Southeast Finland Frontier Guard
    THE SOUTHEAST FINLAND BORDER GUARD DISTRICT THETHE SOUTHEA SOUTHEASTST FINLAND FINLAND BORDER BORDER GUA GUARDRD DISTRICT DISTRICT Border guard stations 10 Border check station 1 II/123 Border crossing points 8 Uukuniemi International Pitkäpohja Kolmikanta Restricted Imatra BGA (Parikkala) Kangaskoski Immola Personnel 1.1.2006: • headquarters Lake Ladoga • logistics base Niskapietilä Officers 95 Lappeenranta BGA Pelkola Border guards 570 (Imatra) Others 87 Lappeenranta airport Total 752 Nuijamaa Common border with Vehicles: Vainikkala Russia 227 km Virolahti Cars 65 BGA Leino Motorbikes 15 Vyborg Snowmobiles 59 Patrol boats 11 Vaalimaa Vaalimaa Hurppu Dogs 95 (Santio) VI/11 Gulf of Finland BORDERBORDER SECURITYSECURITY SYSTEMSYSTEM ININ SOUTHEASOUTHEASTST FINLAFINLANDND (figures/2005) BORDERBORDER CO-OPERATION WITH SURVEILLASURVEILLANCENCE NATIONAL AUTHORITIES • exposed illegal border crossings 16 • accomplished refused entries 635 • executive assistances 23 • assistances, searches 25 4 3 2 1 CO-OPERATION OVER THE BORDER RUSSIAN BORDER GUARD SERVICE • apprehended ~80 • meetings: • border delegates/deputies 22 • assistants of the border delegates 70 BORDERBORDER CHECKSCHECKS CONSULATES • refusals of entry 707 • ST. PETERSBURG • discovered fraudulent documents 128 • MOSCOW • discovered stolen vehicles 13 • PETROZAVODSK • discovered fraudulent documents 88 BORDERBORDER CHECKSCHECKS Investment: v. 2004 392 man-years; 19,0 mill. € v. 2005 409 man-years; 19,5 mill. € PASSENGERPASSENGER TRAFFIC TRAFFIC 1996 1996 - -20052005 4 764 495 4 694 657
    [Show full text]
  • Combating Political Violence Movements with Third-Force Options Doron Zimmermann ∗
    Between Minimum Force and Maximum Violence: Combating Political Violence Movements with Third-Force Options Doron Zimmermann ∗ Introduction: Balancing the Tools of Counter-Terrorism In most liberal democratic states it is the responsibility of the police forces to cope with “internal” threats, including terrorism, since in such states terrorism is invariably defined as a criminal act rather than a manifestation of insurgent political violence. In many such instances, the resultant quantitative and qualitative overtaxing of law en- forcement capabilities to keep the peace has led to calls by sections of the public, as well as by the legislative and executive branches of government, to expand both the le- gal and operational means available to combat terrorism, and to boost civilian agen- cies’ capacity to deal with terrorism in proportion to the perceived threat. The deterio- rating situation in Ulster in Northern Ireland between 1968 and 1972 and beyond is an illustrative case in point.1 Although there have been cases of successfully transmogrifying police forces into military-like formations, the best-known and arguably most frequent example of aug- mented state responses to the threat posed by insurgent political violence movements is the use of the military in the fight against terrorism and in the maintenance of internal security. While it is imperative that the threat of a collapse of national cohesion due to the overextension of internal civil security forces be averted, the deployment of all branches of the armed forces against a terrorist threat is not without its own pitfalls. Paul Wilkinson has enunciated some of the problems posed by the use of counter-ter- rorism military task forces, not the least of which is that [a] fully militarized response implies the complete suspension of the civilian legal system and its replacement by martial law, summary punishments, the imposition of curfews, military censorship and extensive infringements of normal civil liberties in the name of the exigencies of war.
    [Show full text]
  • Border Management Reform in Transition Democracies
    Border Management Reform in Transition Democracies Editors Aditya Batara G Beni Sukadis Contributors Pierre Aepli Colonel Rudito A.A. Banyu Perwita, PhD Zoltán Nagy Lieutenant-Colonel János Hegedűs First Edition, June 2007 Layout Front Cover Lebanese-Israeli Borders Downloaded from: www.michaelcotten.com Printed by Copyright DCAF & LESPERSSI, 2007 The Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces FOREWORD Suripto, SH Vice Chairman of 3rd Commission, Indonesian House of Representatives And Chariman of Lesperssi Founder Board Border issues have been one of the largest areas of concern for Indonesia. Since becoming a sovereign state 61 years ago, Indonesia is still facing a series of territorial border problems. Up until today, Indonesia has reached agreements with its neighbouring countries related to demarcation and state border delineation. However, the lack of an unequivocal authority for border management has left serious implications for the state’s sovereignty and its citizen’s security. The Indonesian border of today, is still having to deal with border crime, which includes the violation of the territorial border, smuggling and terrorist infiltration, illegal fishing, illegal logging and Human Rights violations. These kinds of violations have also made a serious impact on the state’s sovereignty and citizen’s security. As of today, Indonesia still has an ‘un-settled’ sea territory, with regard to the rights of sovereignty (Additional Zone, Economic Exclusive Zone, and continent plate). This frequently provokes conflict between the authorised sea-territory officer on patrol and foreign ships or fishermen from neighbouring countries. One of the principal border problems is the Sipadan-Ligitan dispute between Indonesia and Malaysia, which started in 1969.
    [Show full text]
  • Illustration De L'effet Frontière
    Kirkenes, bout du monde norvégien ou place commerciale transfrontalière ? Illustration de l’effet frontière 1 Frédéric Lasserre 1 Professeur au département de géographie de l’Université Laval, et directeur du Conseil québécois d’Études géopolitiques. [email protected] ARTICLE Résumé : La frontière terrestre entre Russie Introduction Une commune minière, et Norvège, longtemps très patrouillée et terminus du territoire La petite bourgade de Kirkenes, dans contrôlée lors de la Guerre froide, est norvégien aujourd’hui beaucoup plus ouverte. Le l’Arctique norvégien, compte environ nombre de passages annuels a connu une 3 500 habitants et fait partie de la Fondée en 1906 à partir d’un mo- nette augmentation au cours de la dernière municipalité de Sør-Varanger (Fig. 1). deste hameau de pêcheurs (Viken et décennie, les résidents des zones frontalières Elle se situe à 7 km de la frontière al 2008), la petite ville de Kirkenes a alimentant une activité de tourisme com- russe, sur le segment de 195,7 km de comme vocation économique son mercial bénéfique pour la communauté. frontière terrestre entre Russie et port qui dessert la mine de fer de Cette activité économique prend une Sydvaranger située à 8,5 km à importance croissante dans l’économie Norvège depuis que l’URSS a annexé locale alors même que l’activité minière le corridor de Petsamo aux dépens de l’intérieur des terres, et que relie une périclite. Kirkenes constitue un bon exemple la Finlande en 1944. voie ferrée construite pour l’occa- de l’effet frontière, dans lequel la frontière sion. La mine, l’usine de première ne constitue pas un frein, mais une interface Frontière terrestre longtemps très transformation et le port desservant moteur d’une activité économique.
    [Show full text]
  • Practical Aspects of Cooperation Between the State Border Guard of Latvia and Federal Security Service Border Guard Service of Russian Federation
    PRACTICAL ASPECTS OF COOPERATION BETWEEN THE STATE BORDER GUARD OF LATVIA AND FEDERAL SECURITY SERVICE BORDER GUARD SERVICE OF RUSSIAN FEDERATION Jekaterina Kuprijanova1, Juris Livdāns2 Iluta Arbidāne3 1 State Border Guard, Latvia, e-mail: [email protected] 2State Border Guard, Latvia, e-mail: [email protected] 3 Rezekne Academy of Technologies, Latvia, e-mail: [email protected] Abstract. One of the main State Border Guard priorities is to maintain and develop the state border guarding system, according to the European Union external borders requirements, by fulfilling the conditions of the Schengen acquis. Schengen acquis provides that international cooperation in the field of border security can have multilateral, bilateral and local dimensions. In this context, an agreements concluded with bordering countries on cooperation in the field of border management is an effective tool to strengthen border security (EU Schengen Catalogue, 2002). In research as methodology are used scientific literature in the field of international law, treaties and agreements, the law of the Republic of Latvia, the State border guard of the internal regulations and the State border guard of unpublished materials. The Republic of Latvia and the Russian Federation cooperate in the field of development and implementation of coherent measures for the border control. Cooperation with RF is executed based on treaties and agreements concluded, as well, maintaining contacts between competent representatives of both countries at various management levels. The extensive cooperation between neighbouring countries on maintenance of security at the border results in the elucidation of the incidents occurring at the state border and other relevant issues, at the same time providing stability and security at the common border.
    [Show full text]
  • Joint Barents Transport Plan Proposals for Development of Transport Corridors for Further Studies
    Joint Barents Transport Plan Proposals for development of transport corridors for further studies September 2013 Front page photos: Kjetil Iversen, Rune N. Larsen and Sindre Skrede/NRK Table of Contents Table Summary 7 1 Introduction 12 1.1 Background 12 1.2 Objectives and members of the Expert Group 13 1.3 Mandate and tasks 14 1.4 Scope 14 1.5 Methodology 2 Transport objectives 15 2.1 National objectives 15 2.2 Expert Group’s objective 16 3 Key studies, work and projects of strategic importance 17 3.1 Multilateral agreements and forums for cooperation 17 3.2 Multilateral projects 18 3.4 National plans and studies 21 4 Barents Region – demography, climate and main industries 23 4.1 Area and population 23 4.2 Climate and environment 24 4.3 Overview of resources and key industries 25 4.4 Ores and minerals 25 4.5 Metal industry 27 4.6 Seafood industry 28 4.7 Forest industry 30 4.8 Petroleum industry 32 4.9 Tourism industry 35 4.10 Overall transport flows 37 4.11 Transport hubs 38 5 Main border-crossing corridors in the Barents Region 40 5.1 Corridor: “The Bothnian Corridor”: Oulu – Haparanda/Tornio - Umeå 44 5.2 Corridor: Luleå – Narvik 49 5.3 Corridor: Vorkuta – Syktyvkar – Kotlas – Arkhangelsk - Vartius – Oulu 54 5.4 Corridor: “The Northern Maritime Corridor”: Arkhangelsk – Murmansk – The European Cont. 57 5.5 Corridor: “The Motorway of the Baltic Sea”: Luleå/Kemi/Oulu – The European Continent 65 5.6 Corridor: Petrozavodsk – Murmansk – Kirkenes 68 5.7 Corridor: Kemi – Salla – Kandalaksha 72 5.8 Corridor: Kemi – Rovaniemi – Kirkenes 76
    [Show full text]
  • Lists of the Authorities and Organisations to Which the Persons Designated by the Member States to Represent Them Belong
    Lists of the authorities and organisations to which the persons designated by the Member States to represent them belong. BELGIUM Ministère des Affaires Etrangères SPF Intérieur Police Judiciaire Fédérale BULGARIA Ministry of Interior Permanent Representation of Bulgaria to the EU CZECH REPUBLIC Ministry of Interior/Directorate of Alien Police DENMARK National Kriminalteknisk Enhed GERMANY BSI Bundesdruckerei GmbH Bundeskriminalamt Federal Ministry of Interior ESTONIA Estonian Police and Border Guard Board IRELAND Department of Justice, Equality, and Law Reform -Immigration Control and Investigation Unit GREECE Hellenic Police Headquarters - National Passport Center - Forensic Science Division SPAIN Spanish National Police (Forgery Central Unit) Fábrica Nacional de Moneda y Timbre - Spanish Royal Mint FRANCE Agence Françaises des Normes (AFNOR) Agence Nationale des Titres Sécurisés ITALY Instituto Poligrafico E Zeca Dello Stato (IPZS) - Officina Carte Valori CYPRUS Ministry of Foreign Affairs LATVIA Ministry of Interior - Office of Citizenship and Migration Affairs Embassy of Latvia LITHUANIA Ministry of Foreign Affairs LUXEMBOURG Ministère des Affaires Etrangères HUNGARY Special service for national security MALTA Malta Information Technology Agency Ministry of Foreign Affairs NETHERLANDS Ministerie van Buitenlandse Zaken Ministerie van Justitie Ministry of Interior and Kingdom Relations AUSTRIA Österreichische Staatsdruckerei Abt. II/3 (Fremdenpolizeiangelegenheiten) POLAND Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Department of Consular Affairs
    [Show full text]
  • Anniversary Publication
    Ten Years of Europol 1999-2009 TEN YEARS OF EUROPOL, 1999-2009 Europol Corporate Communications P.O. Box 90850 2509 LW The Hague The Netherlands www.europol.europa.eu © European Police OfÞ ce, 2009 All rights reserved. Reproduction in any form or by any means is allowed only with the prior permission of Europol Editor: Agnieszka Biegaj Text: Andy Brown Photographs: Europol (Zoran Lesic, Bo Pallavicini, Max Schmits, Marcin Skowronek, Europol archives); EU Member States’ Law Enforcement Authorities; European Commission; European Council; Participants of the Europol Photo Competition 2009: Kristian Berlin, Devid Camerlynck, Janusz Gajdas, Jean-François Guiot, Lasse Iversen, Robert Kralj, Tomasz Kurczynski, Antte Lauhamaa, Florin Lazau, Andrzej Mitura, Peter Pobeska, Pawel Ostaszewski, Jorgen Steen, Georges Vandezande Special thanks to all the photographers, EU Member States’ Law Enforcement Authorities and Europol Liaison Bureaux for their contributions 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 7 I. Birth of an Idea, 1991-1998 11 1. Ideas behind Europol: Tackling International Crime 11 2. Maastricht Treaty: the ‘Founding Article’ 12 3. First Step: the Europol Drugs Unit 12 4. The Hague: a Fitting Location 13 5. Formal Status: the Europol Convention 14 6. European Union: New Members and a New Treaty 15 II. The First Years, 1999-2004 21 1. Facing the Challenges: Stabilisation and Consolidation 21 2. Changing Priorities, Flexible Organisation 24 3. Information Exchange and Intelligence Analysis: Core Business 27 4. The Hague Programme: Positioning Europol at the Centre of EU Law Enforcement Cooperation 34 5. Casting the Net Wider: Cooperation Agreements with Third States and Organisations 36 6. Europol’s Most Important Asset: the Staff and the ELO Network 37 III.
    [Show full text]
  • Action Plan Pasvik-Inari Trilateral Park 2019-2028
    Action plan Pasvik-Inari Trilateral Park 2019-2028 2019 Action plan Pasvik-Inari Trilateral Park 2019-2028 Date: 31.1.2019 Authors: Kalske, T., Tervo, R., Kollstrøm, R., Polikarpova, N. and Trusova, M. Cover photo: Young generation of birders and environmentalists looking into the future (Pasvik Zapovednik, О. Кrotova) The Trilateral Advisory Board: FIN Metsähallitus, Parks & Wildlife Finland Centre for Economic Development, Transport and the Environments in Lapland (Lapland ELY-centre) Inari Municipality NOR Office of the Finnmark County Governor Øvre Pasvik National Park Board Sør-Varanger Municipality RUS Pasvik Zapovednik Pechenga District Municipality Nikel Local Municipality Ministry of Natural Resource and Ecology of the Murmansk region Ministry of Economic Development of the Murmansk region, Tourism division Observers: WWF Barents Office Russia, NIBIO Svanhovd Norway Contacts: FINLAND NORWAY Metsähallitus, Parks & Wildlife Finland Troms and Finnmark County Governor Ivalo Customer Service Tel. +47 789 50 300 Tel. +358 205 64 7701 [email protected] [email protected] Northern Lapland Nature Centre Siida RUSSIA Tel. +358 205 64 7740 Pasvik State Nature Reserve [email protected] (Pasvik Zapovednik) Tel./fax: +7 815 54 5 07 00 [email protected] (Nikel) [email protected] (Rajakoski) 2 Action Plan Pasvik-Inari Trilateral Park 2019-2028 3 Preface In this 10-year Action Plan for the Pasvik-Inari Trilateral Park, we present the background of the long-lasting nature protection and management cooperation, our mutual vision and mission, as well as the concrete development ideas of the cooperation for the next decade. The plan is considered as an advisory plan focusing on common long-term guidance and cooperation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Changkufeng and Nomonhan Incidents – the Undeclared Border War and Its Impact on World War Ii
    University of Texas at El Paso DigitalCommons@UTEP Open Access Theses & Dissertations 2014-01-01 The hC angkufeng And Nomonhan Incidents - The Undeclared Border War And Its Impact on World War II Tobias Block University of Texas at El Paso, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.utep.edu/open_etd Part of the Asian History Commons, Asian Studies Commons, Military History Commons, Slavic Languages and Societies Commons, and the Soviet and Post-Soviet Studies Commons Recommended Citation Block, Tobias, "The hC angkufeng And Nomonhan Incidents - The ndeU clared Border War And Its Impact on World War II" (2014). Open Access Theses & Dissertations. 1588. https://digitalcommons.utep.edu/open_etd/1588 This is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UTEP. It has been accepted for inclusion in Open Access Theses & Dissertations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UTEP. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE CHANGKUFENG AND NOMONHAN INCIDENTS – THE UNDECLARED BORDER WAR AND ITS IMPACT ON WORLD WAR II TOBIAS BLOCK DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY APPROVED: __________________________________________ Joshua Fan, Ph.D., Chair __________________________________________ Paul Edison, Ph.D. __________________________________________ Jose Villalobos, Ph.D. __________________________________ Bess Sirmon-Taylor, Ph.D. Interim Dean of the Graduate School THE CHANGKUFENG AND NOMONHAN INCIDENTS - THE UNDECLARED BORDER WAR AND ITS IMPACT ON WORLD WAR II by Tobias Block, BA Thesis Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at El Paso in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS Department Of HISTORY THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS OF EL PASO May 2014 Table of Contents Table of Contents…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
    [Show full text]