DOCSLIB.ORG

Management of Foreign Bodies in the Skin GWEN WAGSTROM HALAAS, MD, MBA, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minnesota

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Management of Foreign Bodies in the Skin GWEN WAGSTROM HALAAS, MD, MBA, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minnesota Management of Foreign Bodies in the Skin GWEN WAGSTROM HALAAS, MD, MBA, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minnesota Although puncture wounds are common, retained foreign bodies are not. Wounds with a foreign body sensation should be evaluated. The presence of wood or vegetative material, graphite or other pigmenting materials, and pain is an indication for foreign body removal. Radiography may be used to locate foreign bodies for removal, and ultrasonography can be helpful for localizing radiolucent foreign bodies. It is wise to set a time limit for exploration and to have a plan for further evaluation or referral. Injuries at high risk of infection include organic foreign bodies or dirty wounds. These should be treated with plain water irrigation and complete removal of retained fragments. In most cases, antibiotic prophylaxis is not indicated. If a patient presents with an infected wound, the possibility of a retained foreign body should be considered. Tetanus prophylaxis is necessary if there is no knowledge or documentation of tetanus immunization within 10 years, including tetanus immune globulin for the person with a dirty wound whose history of tetanus toxoid doses is unknown or incomplete. (Am Fam Physician 2007;76:683-8. Copyright © 2007 American Academy of Family Physicians.) oreign bodies may be retained in Investigating for Possible Foreign Body the body through many mechanisms, Patients may not be aware of retained mate- including ingestion, placement in rial, but if there is sensation of a foreign bodily orifices, and surgical errors. body, it is important to explore the wound. F This article is limited to objects that have Removal is easier if wounds are examined penetrated the skin. Puncture or impale- within 24 hours because the entry wound is ment injuries are common. In the United visible and open. Older injuries have inflam- States in 1999, there were 8.2 million emer- mation, induration, scarring, and/or gran- gency department visits for open wounds.1 ulated tissue, making it more difficult to Retained foreign bodies are not common. localize the foreign body. The risk of infec- The authors of one study involving patients tion increases with time until the wound is injured by broken glass found retained glass fully healed. in 15 percent of wounds.2 The risk of punc- The mechanism of injury is important in ture wounds and retained foreign bodies evaluating for foreign bodies. Bite injuries increases in warmer seasons or climates may include teeth, and punches to the face because of bare skin and outdoor recreation. may include tooth fragments in the punch- Persons who work in occupations such as ing hand. Broken objects causing wounds carpentry and the garment industry are at may leave embedded fragments. Wounds increased risk of impalement with nails or from nails or other sharp objects puncturing pins. These injuries are more common in the foot through shoes or socks may include children or adults with mental or physical remnants of leather, cloth, or rubber.4 impairment, which may result in behavior or The composition of the foreign body will lack of control that increases risk. influence evaluation and removal. Metal Although these injuries may seem minor, objects in soft tissue pose a lower risk of wounds with neglected foreign bodies are a infection than organic matter. Inert metal common cause of malpractice claims.3 Any foreign bodies may not have to be removed, wound that penetrates the skin should be because removal might cause more trauma evaluated to determine if exploration for for- than simply leaving them in place. The deci- eign bodies is needed. An accurate history of sion to remove a foreign body is also based the mechanism of injury and description of on symptoms or risk of complications. If a the probable object can help localize the prob- foreign body is producing pain, it should be lem and determine the need for removal. removed. Downloaded from the American Family Physician Web site at www.aafp.org/afp. Copyright © 2007 American Academy of Family Physicians. For the private, noncommercial use of one individual user of the Web site. All other rights reserved. Contact [email protected] for copyright questions and/or permission requests. Foreign Bodies in the Skin negative predictive value was high, 57 per- SORT: KEY RECOMMENDATIONS FOR PRACTICE cent of retained glass foreign bodies would 2 Evidence have been missed without radiography. Clinical recommendation rating References In patients with sensation of foreign body, superficial wounds that have been adequately Radiography should be used to evaluate B 5 explored do not require radiography. Plain deep wounds. films can be clinically beneficial in locating Ultrasonography should be used to localize B 7 radiolucent foreign bodies. glass foreign bodies in deep wounds with 5 Topical 4% liposomal lidocaine should be A 10 or without exploration. In patients without used for wound exploration in children. sensation, the history can guide the decision Foreign body wounds should be cleaned with A 14, 15 for further investigation. All glass is radi- tap water. opaque; however, there is limited ability for Antiseptic solutions should not be used for A 16 radiography to detect glass fragments smaller cleansing foreign body wounds because than 2 mm.2 Glass is inert and can be left in they slow healing. place if it is difficult to locate or remove. Antibiotics should be considered for human A 19 bites and bites on the hand. OTHER A = consistent, good-quality patient-oriented evidence; B = inconsistent or limited- Pencil lead or graphite foreign bodies can quality patient-oriented evidence; C = consensus, disease-oriented evidence, usual result in pigment tattooing and should be practice, expert opinion, or case series. For information about the SORT evidence removed. Metallic foreign bodies such as rating system, see page 612 or http://www.aafp.org/afpsort.xml. bullets or BBs may be removed without difficulty if superficial and distant from ten- dons, nerves, or blood vessels. When removal Types of Foreign Bodies might cause damage, metallic foreign bodies can be left in SPLINTERS place unless symptoms occur or infection is present. Splinters are commonly from wood, thorns, or spines from plants but also may be plastic or glass. Wood and Evaluation and Localization vegetative material must be removed from wounds Penetrating wounds can damage nerves or blood vessels. because they are associated with increased inflammation Evaluating patient sensation and circulation is essential. and risk of infection. Larger or buried splinters can result Superficial foreign bodies can sometimes be palpated or in difficulty removing the entire foreign body or local- visualized. Deeper foreign bodies may require additional izing it for removal. methods to localize. Palpation with a gloved finger should be avoided because of the risk of puncturing the glove FISHHOOKS and finger and being exposed to blood-borne diseases. Fishhooks caught in the skin are problematic because Imaging is not necessary if the foreign body is ade- of the barbs that are intended to keep fish on the hook. quately visible for removal or if it does not require Fishhooks have a straight shank and a curved belly with removal. For wounds that require imaging, appropriate a barbed point at the end. Some fishhooks have multiple modalities include radiography, computed tomography barbs. Others have multiple hooks, and it is necessary to (CT), and ultrasonography, depending on the size and cut off the other hooks for safe removal. Most fishhook type of foreign body. Underpenetrated plain radiography injuries occur in the hand, face or scalp, upper extremity, is the most economic and available method for viewing or foot. Fishhooks in the eyelid or eye require immediate radiopaque foreign bodies, including metal, bone, teeth, ophthalmologic referral. pencil graphite, certain plastics, glass, gravel, stone, some fish spines, wood, and aluminum.4 Although CT GLASS is more sensitive than radiography, the increased cost Patients with glass embedded in a wound are more likely limits CT to foreign bodies that are not visible on radi- to report the sensation of foreign bodies. One study ography and pose a risk of infection or joint injury.6 found that patient sensation was more likely for wounds Ultrasonography is widely available and helpful in with retained glass than for those without glass. The posi- finding wooden or radiolucent foreign bodies.7 Detec- tive predictive value of patient sensation was 31 percent; tion of foreign bodies with ultrasonography has a negative predictive value was 89 percent. Although the sensitivity of 50 to 90 percent and a specificity of 70 to 684 American Family Physician www.aafp.org/afp Volume 76, Number 5 ◆ September 1, 2007 Foreign Bodies in the Skin 97 percent for gravel, metal, cactus spines, wood, and plastic.4 In one study, ultrasonography localized 19 of 21 Table 1. Imaging Modalities for Localizing foreign bodies not found on radiography.7 Ultrasonogra- Various Types of Foreign Bodies in Skin phy can help determine the depth, size, and shape of the and Subcutaneous Tissue foreign body and its relationship to anatomic structures such as bones, tendons, blood vessels, or joints. Computed tomography Many foreign bodies are surrounded by a hypoecho- Reserve for failed exploration or infection genic area representing inflammation.8 Localizing some Radiography foreign bodies can be easier with multiple views, metal- Bone lic markers, or needles inserted close to the foreign body. Fish spines (some) Table 1 describes appropriate imaging modalities for Glass various types of foreign bodies.4,6-8 Gravel/stone Metal/aluminum Removal Techniques Pencil graphite Being adequately prepared for the removal of foreign Plastic (some) bodies increases success rates and avoids complications. Teeth Wound exploration is aided by optimal lighting, magni- Wood (e.g., splinters, cactus spines, thorns) fication, and adequate hemostasis. The wound and gloves Ultrasonography should be cleansed before removal is attempted.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Chapter 32 FOREIGN BODIES of the HEAD, NECK, and SKULL BASE
    Foreign Bodies of the Head, Neck, and Skull Base Chapter 32 FOREIGN BODIES OF THE HEAD, NECK, AND SKULL BASE RICHARD J. BARNETT, MD* INTRODUCTION PENETRATING NECK TRAUMA Anatomy Emergency Management Clinical Examination Investigations OPERATIVE VERSUS NONOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT Factors in the Deployed Setting Operative Management Postoperative Care PEDIATRIC INJURIES ORBITAL FOREIGN BODIES SUMMARY CASE PRESENTATIONS Case Study 32-1 Case Study 32-2 Case Study 32-3 Case Study 32-4 Case Study 32-5 Case Study 32-6 *Lieutenant Colonel, Medical Corps, US Air Force; Chief of Facial Plastic Surgery/Otolaryngology, Eglin Air Force Base Department of ENT, 307 Boatner Road, Suite 114, Eglin Air Force Base, Florida 32542-9998 423 Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Combat Casualty Care INTRODUCTION The mechanism and extent of war injuries are sig- other military conflicts. In a study done in Croatia with nificantly different from civilian trauma. Many of the 117 patients who sustained penetrating neck injuries, wounds encountered are unique and not experienced about a quarter of the wounds were from gunshots even at Role 1 trauma centers throughout the United while the rest were from shell or bomb shrapnel.1 The States. Deployed head and neck surgeons must be injury patterns resulting from these mechanisms can skilled at performing an array of evaluations and op- vary widely, and treating each injury requires thought- erations that in many cases they have not performed in ful planning to achieve a successful outcome. a prior setting. During a 6-month tour in Afghanistan, This chapter will address penetrating neck injuries all subspecialties of otolaryngology were encountered: in general, followed specifically by foreign body inju- head and neck (15%), facial plastic/reconstructive ries of the head, face, neck, and skull base.
    [Show full text]
  • Bruises- Wounds
    Henry Shih OD, MD Medical Director Austin Emergency Center- Anderson Mill 13435 US Highway 183 North Suite 311 Austin, TX 78750 512-614-1200 BRUISES- http://austiner.com/ What are bruises? — Bruises happen when blood vessels under the skin break, but the skin isn’t cut. Blood leaks into the tissues under the skin. Bruises start off red in color, and then turn blue or purple. As they heal, bruises can turn green and yellow. Most bruises heal in 1 to 2 weeks, but some take longer. How are bruises treated? — A bruise will get better on its own. But to feel better and help your bruise heal, you can: o Put a cold gel pack, bag of ice, or bag of frozen vegetables on the injured area every 1 to 2 hours, for 15 minutes each time. Put a thin towel between the ice (or other cold object) and your skin. Use the ice (or other cold object) for at least 6 hours after your injury. Some people find it helpful to ice longer, even up to 2 days after their injury. o Raise the area, if possible – Raising the area above the level of your heart helps to reduce swelling. o Take medicine to reduce the pain and swelling – To treat pain, you can take Tylenol. To treat pain and swelling, you can take ibuprofen (sample brand names: Advil, Motrin). But people who have certain conditions or take certain medicines should not take ibuprofen. If you are unsure, ask your doctor or nurse if you can take ibuprofen.
    [Show full text]
  • Foreign Body Insertions: a Review
    FEATURE Foreign Body Insertions: A Review Alan Lucerna, DO Treating patients who present with foreign body insertions requires a nonjudgmental and open-minded approach. Anorectal and urethral foreign body in- series was obtained and confirmed a beer sertions (polyembolokoilamania) are not bottle in the rectum (Figures 1 and 2). This infrequent presentations to the ED. The study was performed prior to the rectal ex- motivations behind these insertions vary, amination to evaluate the orientation and ranging from autoeroticism to reckless be- integrity of the item, to prevent accidental havior. These insertions can lead to major injury from sharp objects. On examination, complications and even death. Though ED there was palpable glass in the rectum con- staff members are used to the unpredict- sistent with the rounded base of a bottle. ability of human behavior, foreign body The glass appeared intact and no gross insertions bring a mixture of responses bleeding was noted. Given the orientation from the staff, ranging from awe and in- of the bottle on the X-ray image, a surgical credulousness to anger and frustration. consultation was obtained and the patient A knowledge and comfort in managing these cases includes a nonjudgmental triage assess- ment, collective professional- ism, and self-awareness of the staff’s reaction. Case 1 A 58-year-old man presented to the ED for evaluation of a foreign body in his rectum. He admitted to placing a beer bottle in his rec- tum, but was unable to remove it at home. The staff reported that the patient was previously seen in the ED for removal of a vibra- tor from his rectum.
    [Show full text]
  • Foreign Rectal Body – Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    REVIEW 61 Foreign rectal body – Systematic review and meta-analysis M. Ploner1, A. Gardetto2, F. Ploner3, M. Scharl4, S. Shoap5, H. C. Bäcker5 (1) Department of Anesthesiology and Intensiver Care, Cantonal Spital Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland ; (2) Department of Plastic Surgery, Hospital Sterzing, Sterzing, South Tirol, Italy ; (3) Department of Anesthesiology and Emergency Medicine, Hospital Sterzing, South Tirol, Italy ; (4) Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Swetzerland ; (5) Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, USA. Abstract instrumentation (7). The most common complication is a rectal injury, which can result from a variety of agents and Background : Self-inserted foreign rectal bodies are an objects (8). Often, nonsurgical removal of foreign bodies infrequent occurrence, however they present a serious dilemma to the surgeon, due to the variety of objects, and the difficulty of has been described to be successful – in 11% to 65% – extraction. The purpose of this study is to give a comprehensive (9), however, in many situations, a surgical treatment review of the literature regarding the epidemiology, diagnostic may be essential. There have been a variety of algorithms tools and therapeutic approaches of foreign rectal body insertion. Methods : A comprehensive systematic literature review on introduced for the management of extraction, however, Pubmed/ Medline and Google for ‘foreign bodies’ was performed because of the diversity of foreign bodies, improvisation, on January 14th 2018. A meta-analysis was carried out to evaluate as well creativity of the treating emergency physician the epidemiology, diagnostics and therapeutic techniques. 1,551 abstracts were identified, of which 54 articles were included.
    [Show full text]
  • NEISS Coding Manual January 2018
    NNEEIISSSS CCooddiinngg MMaannuuaall JJaannuuaarryy 22001188 NEISS – National Electronic Injury Surveillance System January 2018 Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................................. 1 General Instructions ................................................................................................................................... 1 General NEISS Reporting Rule .................................................................................................................. 1 Do Report .................................................................................................................................................. 1 Definitions .............................................................................................................................................. 2 Do Not Report ........................................................................................................................................... 3 Specific Coding Instructions ..................................................................................................................... 4 Medical Information Codes ........................................................................................................................ 4 Date of Treatment ..................................................................................................................................... 4 (8 spaces).................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Injury Description Codes Nature of Injury
    Injury Description Codes Nature of Injury Code Narrative Description I. Specific Injury * 01. No Physical Injury i.e., Glasses, contact lenses, artificial appliance, replacement of artificial appliance 02. Amputation Cut off extremity, digit, protruding part of body, usually by surgery, i.e. leg, arm 03. Angina Pectoris Chest pain 04. Burn (Heat) Burns or scald. The effect of contact with hot substances. (Chemical) burns. tissue damage resulting from the corrosive action chemicals, fume, etc., (acids, alkalies) 07. Concussion Brain, cerebral 10. Contusion Bruise - intact skin surface hematoma 13. Crushing To grind, pound or break into small bits 16. Dislocation Pinched nerve, slipped/ruptured disc, herniated disc, sciatica, complete tear, HNP subluxtion, MD dislocation 19. Electric Shock Electrocution 22. Enucleation Removal of organ or tumor 25. Foreign Body * 28. Fracture Breaking of a bone or cartilage 30. Freezing Frostbite and other effects of exposure to low temperature 31. Hearing Loss or Impairment Traumatic only. A separate injury, not the sequelae of another injury 32. Heat Prostration Heat stroke, sun stroke, heat exhaustion, heat cramps and other effects of environmental heat. does not include sunburn 34. Hernia The abnormal protrusion of an organ or part through the containing wall of its cavity 36. Infection The invasion of a host by organisms such as bacteria, fungi, viruses, mold, protozoa or insects, with or without manifest disease. 37. Inflammation The reaction of tissue to injury characterized clinically by heat, swelling, redness and pain *Description intentionally left blank. May 25, 2021 Injury Description Codes Nature of Injury 38. Adverse reaction to a vaccination or * inoculation 40.
    [Show full text]
  • Foreign Body Imaging-Experience with 6 Cases of Retained Foreign Bodies in the Emergency
    Arch Clin Med Case Rep 2020; 4 (5): 952-968 DOI: 10.26502/acmcr.96550285 Case Series Foreign Body Imaging-Experience with 6 Cases of Retained Foreign Bodies in the Emergency Radiology Unit Muniraju Maralakunte MD1, Uma Debi MD1*, Lokesh Singh MD1, Himanshu Pruthi MD1, Vikas Bhatia MD, DNB DM1, Gita Devi MD1, Sandhu MS MD1 2Department of Radio diagnosis, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India *Corresponding Author: Dr. Uma Debi, Radiodiagnosis and Imaging, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India, Tel: 0091- 172-2756381; Fax: 0091-172-2745768; E-mail: [email protected] Received: 22 June 2020; Accepted: 14 August 2020; Published: 21 September 2020 Abstract Introduction: Retained foreign bodies are the external objects lying within the body, which are placed with voluntary or involuntary intentions. The involuntarily or accidentally, and complicated cases with the retained foreign body may come to the emergency services, which may require rapid and adequate imaging assessment. Materials and methods: We share our experience with six different cases with retained foreign bodies, who visited emergency radiological services with acute presentation of symptoms. The choice of radiological investigation considered based on the clinical presentation of the subjects with a retained foreign body. Conclusion: Patients with the retained foreign body may present acute symptoms to the emergency medical or surgical services, radiologists play a central role in rapid imaging evaluation. Radiological investigation plays a crucial role in identification, localization, characterization, and reporting the complication of the retained foreign bodies, and in many scenarios, radiological investigations may expose the unsuspected or concealed foreign bodies in the human body. Ultimately radiological services are useful rapid assessment tools that aid in triage and guide in the medical or surgical management of patients with a retained foreign body.
    [Show full text]
  • Using Injury Narrative with Tri-Code to Obtain Accurate Diagnosis Codes and Scoring
    Injury Coding – Using Injury Narrative with Tri-Code to Obtain Accurate Diagnosis Codes and Scoring Injury Coding Webinar Series James Pou Product Strategy - Product Manager Digital Innovation - eso.com powered by Copyright © 2020 ESO Inc. All Rights Reserved. powered by Objectives • Search for and abstract the additional detail to support ICD10 Injury coding. • Enter narrative and code using Tri-Code to accurately assign ICD10-CM and AIS. © Copyright 2020 ESO Inc. All Rights Reserved. Tri-Code and Injury Coding in ICD10 powered by • Two methods of coding in Tri-Code • Code by narrative description of injury. Consists of the following: • One injury per line which includes: • Organ or body part • Description of injury • Extent of injury • Code by ICD10 injury code: • Enter each ICD10 Injury Diagnosis on a separate lines © Copyright 2020 ESO Inc. All Rights Reserved. Using Tri-Code powered by • Narrative Based Coding: • Complete set of Guidelines available –Tri-Code for ICD10 Guidelines – ICD10-CM with AIS 2005 Update 2008 • Includes detailed guidelines by AIS chapter. © Copyright 2020 ESO Inc. All Rights Reserved. powered by Narrative Development Guidelines • Cornerstone of accurate injury coding – Good abstraction of injuries from the medical record. • Abstraction Recommendations • Read entire patient chart – In particular focus on: • Radiological results • Operative reports (tells you what has been fixed that was injured) • Consult reports • Discharge abstracts • Autopsy reports (if can be obtained for deaths) © Copyright 2020 ESO Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • MS Woundexploration Slide14.Pdf
    Documentation Dissection ANESTHESIA: General PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: Accidental gunshot wound to the right neck. POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: Accidental gunshot wound |1| to the right neck |2| with large hematoma and subcutaneous air in the right neck. NAME OF OPERATION: 1. Right neck exploration |3| 2. Foreign body removal |3| PERIOPERATIVE ANTIBIOTICS: Ancef one g IV DVT PROPHYLAXIS: Bilateral SCDs throughout the case INDICATIONS FOR PROCEDURE: This is a sixty-year-old man who sustained an accidental gunshot wound |4| that penetrated the right neck. The patient arrived with an open wound and hematoma on the right neck. |5| He was combative and belligerent. He was intubated in the emergency department. CT scan revealed no hard evidence of arterial injury but a bullet directly in line with the internal jugular vein, a large right sided neck hematoma and subcutaneous air. We elected to take him to the operating room for neck exploration to rule out vascular injury and injury to the aero digestive tract. DESCRIPTION OF PROCEDURE: The patient was brought to the operating room and placed supine on the operating room table. General endotracheal anesthesia was administered. The right neck, chest, and left leg were prepped and draped in the sterile fashion. A proper time out was performed. A right sternocleidomastoid incision was performed to widen the wound for exploration and it was carried down through the platysma muscle |6|. The sternocleidomastoid muscle was retracted laterally. The carotid sheath was identified. The carotid sheath in zone one and lower portion of zone two of the neck was without evidence of trauma or hematoma.
    [Show full text]
  • Development of the ICD-10 Procedure Coding System (ICD-10-PCS)
    Development of the ICD-10 Procedure Coding System (ICD-10-PCS) Richard F. Averill, M.S., Robert L. Mullin, M.D., Barbara A. Steinbeck, RHIT, Norbert I. Goldfield, M.D, Thelma M. Grant, RHIA, Rhonda R. Butler, CCS, CCS-P The International Classification of Diseases 10th Revision Procedure Coding System (ICD-10-PCS) has been developed as a replacement for Volume 3 of the International Classification of Diseases 9th Revision (ICD-9-CM). The development of ICD-10-PCS was funded by the U.S. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS).1 ICD-10- PCS has a multiaxial seven character alphanumeric code structure that provides a unique code for all substantially different procedures, and allows new procedures to be easily incorporated as new codes. ICD10-PCS was under development for over five years. The initial draft was formally tested and evaluated by an independent contractor; the final version was released in the Spring of 1998, with annual updates since the final release. The design, development and testing of ICD-10-PCS are discussed. Introduction Volume 3 of the International Classification of Diseases 9th Revision Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) has been used in the U.S. for the reporting of inpatient pro- cedures since 1979. The structure of Volume 3 of ICD-9-CM has not allowed new procedures associated with rapidly changing technology to be effectively incorporated as new codes. As a result, in 1992 the U.S. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) funded a project to design a replacement for Volume 3 of ICD-9-CM.
    [Show full text]
  • ICD-10 Project Lead
    GET READY! Tools for a Successful Implementation August 14, 2015 Michelle Miles, Medicaid Provider Liaison MDHHS ICD-10 Awareness and Training, Provider Relations Lynn Hicks, Medicaid Provider Consultant MDHHS Provider Support , Provider Relations AMA & CMS announce Collaboration in ICD-10 transition on July 6, 2015 CMS is creating an ICD-10 Ombudsman to deal with healthcare providers' ICD-10 problems. CMS promises that Medicare will not deny any medical claims "based solely on the specificity of the ICD-10 diagnosis code as long as the physician/practitioner used a valid code from the right family." Quality reporting programs such as Physician Quality Reporting System (PQRS), Value Based Modifier (VBM), or Meaningful Use 2 (MU) will suspend penalties that may result because of lack of specificity. There will be advance payments available if the Medicare system has problems. Full Press Release at: http://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Coding/ICD10/Downloads/AMA-CMS- press-release-letterhead-07-05-15.pdf CMS released updated FAQs and Clarification to FAQs regarding AMA Collaboration Get Ready! ~ Tools for a Successful Implementation 2 PART ONE Michelle Miles, Medicaid Provider Liaison MDHHS ICD-10 Awareness and Training, Provider Relations ICD-10 Project Lead Get Ready! ~ Tools for a Successful Implementation 3 History of ICD-10 • Federal Mandate • Date of Implementation Changes with Implementation • Code Set • Structure • Volume Benefits with Implementation Get Ready! ~ Tools for a Successful Implementation 4 International Classification
    [Show full text]
  • Laparoscopic Removal of an Occult Foreign Body Causing Penetrating Abdominal Trauma in a Child
    Early release, published at www.cmaj.ca on November 25, 2013. Subject to revision. CMAJ Practice Cases Laparoscopic removal of an occult foreign body causing penetrating abdominal trauma in a child Ram V. Anantha MD, Rodrick K. Lim MD, Neil H. Merritt MD n otherwise healthy 4-year-old boy was through a 12-mm infraumbilical port. A thin Competing interests: None brought to the emergency department shard of glass (2 × 6 cm2) wrapped in omentum declared. A by his mother several hours after he had was visualized in the left upper quadrant (Fig- Correspondence to: an unwitnessed fall at home. He had been play- ure 2). A second 5-mm port was placed through Neil Merritt, [email protected] ing with his friends, when they found him bleed- the wound site, and the foreign body was ing through his shirt. He had no relevant past grasped and removed under direct visualization. CMAJ 2013. DOI:10.1503 medical or surgical history, medication use or Two additional 5-mm ports were inserted in the /cmaj.131100 allergies. His vital signs were within normal lim- left and right lower quadrants to facilitate mobi- its, although he complained of abdominal pain. lization and inspection of the small and large On physical examination, his abdomen was bowels. Thorough examination of the peritoneal soft, nondistended and diffusely tender, with no cavity did not reveal any injury to the stomach, rebound tenderness or involuntary guarding. A small intestine, retroperitoneum, colon, liver or small 1-cm linear wound was found in the left spleen. The ports were removed, his abdomen upper quadrant of his abdomen, along the mid- was deflated, and the fascia and skin were clavicular line.
    [Show full text]