Arxiv:1002.4788V1 [Quant-Ph]
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Laser & Photonics Reviews, August 29, 2018 1 Abstract This article reviews recent hybrid approaches to op- tical quantum information processing, in which both discrete and continuous degrees of freedom are exploited. There are well-known limitations to optical single-photon-based qubit and multi-photon-based qumode implementations of quantum communication and quantum computation, when the toolbox is restricted to the most practical set of linear operations and resources such as linear optics and Gaussian operations and states. The recent hybrid approaches aim at pushing the fea- sibility, the efficiencies, and the fidelities of the linear schemes Schematics for the optical implementation of entanglement dis- to the limits, potentially adding weak or measurement-induced nonlinearities to the toolbox. tribution between two stations in a hybrid quantum repeater. Copyright line will be provided by the publisher Optical hybrid approaches to quantum information Peter van Loock Optical Quantum Information Theory Group, Max Planck Institute for the Science of Light, Institute of Theoretical Physics I, Universit¨at Erlangen-N¨urnberg, Staudtstr.7/B2, 91058 Erlangen, Germany Received: . Published online: . Key words: quantum computation, quantum communication, quantum optics, entanglement, qubits, qumodes, hybrid Contents tion and quantum communication. More precisely, multi- partite entangled, so-called cluster states are a sufficient 1. Introduction ...................... 1 resource for universal, measurement-based quantum com- 2. Optical quantum information . 3 putation [1]. Further, the sequential distribution of many 3. Hybrid approaches . 13 copies of entangled states in a quantum repeater allow for 4. Summary and outlook . 31 extending quantum communicationto large distances, even when the physical quantum channel is imperfect such as a lossy, optical fiber [2,3]. 1. Introduction Many if not most experiments related to quantum in- arXiv:1002.4788v1 [quant-ph] 25 Feb 2010 formation are conducted with quantum optical systems. Quantum informationis a relatively young area of interdis- This includes the preparation, manipulation, and measure- ciplinary research. One of its main goals is, from a more ment of interesting and useful quantum optical states, in conceptualpoint of view, to combinethe principlesof quan- particular, entangled states; possibly supplemented by ad- tum physics with those of information theory. Information ditional atomic systems for storing and processing quan- is physical is one of the key messages, and, on a deeper tum states. level, it is quantum physical. Apart from its conceptual im- Why is quantum optics the preferred field for quan- portance, however, quantum information may also lead to tum information demonstrations? Based on mature tech- real-world applications for communication(quantum com- niques from nonlinear optics for state preparation such as munication) and computation (quantum computation) by parametric down conversion, together with the most ac- exploiting quantum properties such as the superposition cessible means for manipulating optical states with lin- principle and entanglement. In recent years, especially en- ear elements such as beam splitters, there is a long list of tanglementturned out to play the most prominentrole, rep- optical proof-of-principle demonstrations of various quan- resenting a universal resource for both quantum computa- tum information processing tasks. Some of these experi- e-mail: [email protected] Copyright line will be provided by the publisher 2 : ments are performed with single-photon states, leading to as beam splitting and squeezing unitaries, all transform- a discrete-variable (DV) encoding of quantum informa- ing Gaussian states into Gaussian states. Similarly, a fully tion, where, for instance, a qubit space is spanned by two Gaussian qumode quantum computer can always be ef- orthogonal polarizations (‘photonic qubits’) [4]. In other ficiently simulated by a classical computer [9]. A single experiments, continuous-variable (CV) states, defined in non-Gaussian element such as a cubic Hamiltonian would an infinite-dimensional Hilbert space, are utilized, for ex- be sufficient to both achieve universality and prevent clas- ample, expressed in terms of the quadrature amplitudes of sical simulability. In general, however, non-Gaussian trans- an optical, bosonic mode (‘photonic qumodes’) [5]. Typi- formations are difficult to realize on optical Gaussian sta- cally, the DV experiments involve some heralding mecha- tes; nonetheless deterministic protocols for approximating nism, rendering them conditional, and hence less efficient; such gates exist [10] (the ‘GKP’ scheme). nonetheless, fidelities in the DV schemes are fairly high Although the physical states in quantumoptical approa- [6]. Conversely, in the CV regime, unconditional opera- ches, representing quantized harmonic oscillators, would tions and high efficiencies are at the expense of lower fi- always live in infinite-dimensional Fock space, there is delities [7]. a weaker, but possibly more useful notion of universal- Beyond experimental small-scale demonstrations, to- ity (‘DV universality’). It refers to the ability to approx- wards potential real-world applications, light is clearly the imately simulate any DV multi-qubit unitary with a finite optimal choice for communication. Moreover, in order to set of gates, logically acting on a finite subspace of the mediate interactions between distant matter qubits on a infinite-dimensional optical Fock space, spanned by states fixed array (for instance, in a solid-state system), individ- with only a few photons (photonic qubits). In this case, ual photons or intense light pulses may be utilized. In such a universal set must also contain a nonlinear interaction, a scenario, the light field acts as a kind of quantum bus unless we accept probabilistic operations [11] (the ‘KLM’ (‘qubus’)for applyingentanglinggates to the matter qubits. scheme). Similarly, exactly fulfilling finite tasks suppos- This kind of optical, qubus-mediated quantum logic could edly simpler than universal quantum computation, such as become part of a full quantum computer. In addition, it a complete, photonic two-qubit Bell measurement, would is exactly this qubus approach which can be exploited for be impossible with only linear elements (including squeez- quantum communication in a quantum repeater, where the ers) [12,13,14]. The problem is that nonlinear interactions optical qubus propagates through a fiber (or even through on the level of single photons are hard to obtain. It is very free space) between neighboring repeater stations and lo- difficult to make two photons “talk” to each other. cally interacts with each matter qubit for nonlocal, entan- gled-state preparation of the two distant qubits. In analogy to classical, optical/electronic hybrid computers, the above 1.2. Going hybrid schemes may be referred to as ‘hybrid’ approaches, as they combine the useful features of both light and matter; the In a hybrid scheme, where DV and CV degrees of freedom former as an ideal medium for communicating, the latter are exploitedat the same time and the goalis to circumvent well suited for storing quantum information. the limitations of the linear approaches, it can be useful to In addition to the hybrid notion mentioned in the pre- consider two special notions of nonlinearity: one is that of ceding paragraph, there is a related, but somewhat differ- weak nonlinearities, the other one is that of measurement- ent definition of (optical) hybrid quantum information pro- induced nonlinearities. The former one would then be ef- tocols. These are inspired by practical as well as funda- fectively enhanced through the use of sufficiently intense mental limitations of those optical quantum information light fields; an approach first utilized for quantum non- schemes, which are solely based upon either discrete or demolition measurements with CV states [15]. More re- continuous degrees of freedom. A hybrid scheme, similar cently, weak nonlinearities were applied to combined DV- to a classical, digital/analog hybrid computer, would then CV, i.e., hybrid systems, where the weak nonlinear inter- exploit at the same time both DV and CV states, encod- action is not only enhanced, but also mediated between the ings, gates, measurements, and techniques, in order to cir- DV components through a bright CV qubus state. This en- cumvent those limitations. ables one to perform various tasks from projecting onto the complete, photonic DV Bell basis to implementing univer- sal, photonic two-qubit entangling gates, using either DV (threshold) photon detectors [16], CV homodyne detectors 1.1. CV versus DV [17,18,19,20], or no detectors at all [21,22]. The concept of a measurement-induced nonlinearity It is well known that a very strong version of universal was initiated by the seminal works of KLM [11] and GKP quantum computation (‘CV universality’),namely the abil- [10]. The KLM protocol is a fully DV scheme, using com- ity to simulate any Hamiltonian, expressed as an arbitrary plicated, entangled, multi-photon ancilla states, measure- polynomialof the bosonic mode operators, to arbitrary pre- ments of photon number, and feedforward, whereas the cision, is not achievable with only linear transformations, GKP scheme may be considered one of the first hybrid i.e., Gaussian transformations [8]. Gaussian transforma- protocols.It relies upon DV photon number measurements, tions are rotations and translations in phase space, as well