SOLICITATION AMENDMENT MODIFICATION DE L'invitation 02:00 PM 2016-12-08 Solicitation Closes
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
1 1 Part - Partie 1 of - de 2 See Part 2 for Clauses and Conditions Voir Partie 2 pour Clauses et Conditions RETURN BIDS TO: Title - Sujet RETOURNER LES SOUMISSIONS À: BUFFALO R&O Requirement Bid Receiving - PWGSC / Réception des soumissions Solicitation No. - N° de l'invitation Amendment No. - N° modif. - TPSGC W8485-163201/A 005 11 Laurier St. / 11, rue Laurier Client Reference No. - N° de référence du client Date Place du Portage , Phase III Core 0B2 / Noyau 0B2 W8485-163201 2016-11-22 Gatineau GETS Reference No. - N° de référence de SEAG Québec PW-$$BF-126-26007 K1A 0S5 Bid Fax: (819) 997-9776 File No. - N° de dossier CCC No./N° CCC - FMS No./N° VME 126bf.W8485-163201 Time Zone SOLICITATION AMENDMENT Solicitation Closes - L'invitation prend fin at - à 02:00 PM Fuseau horaire MODIFICATION DE L'INVITATION Eastern Standard Time on - le 2016-12-08 EST F.O.B. - F.A.B. Specified Herein - Précisé dans les présentes The referenced document is hereby revised; unless otherwise indicated, all other terms and conditions of the Solicitation Plant-Usine: Destination: Other-Autre: remain the same. Address Enquiries to: - Adresser toutes questions à: Buyer Id - Id de l'acheteur White, John 126bf Ce document est par la présente révisé; sauf indication contraire, Telephone No. - N° de téléphone FAX No. - N° de FAX les modalités de l'invitation demeurent les mêmes. (613) 420-1749 ( ) (819) 956-9110 Destination - of Goods, Services, and Construction: Destination - des biens, services et construction: Comments - Commentaires Vendor/Firm Name and Address Instructions: See Herein Raison sociale et adresse du fournisseur/de l'entrepreneur Instructions: Voir aux présentes Delivery Required - Livraison exigée Delivery Offered - Livraison proposée Vendor/Firm Name and Address Raison sociale et adresse du fournisseur/de l'entrepreneur Issuing Office - Bureau de distribution Telephone No. - N° de téléphone Airframes / Aero Engines R&O Division / Division de Facsimile No. - N° de télécopieur la réparation de la révision des cellules et des moteurs 11 Laurier St. / 11, rue Laurier Name and title of person authorized to sign on behalf of Vendor/Firm 8C1, Place du Portage (type or print) Gatineau Nom et titre de la personne autorisée à signer au nom du fournisseur/ Québec de l'entrepreneur (taper ou écrire en caractères d'imprimerie) K1A 0S5 Signature Date Page 1 of - de 1 Solicitation No. - N° de l'invitation Amd. No. - N° de la modif. Buyer ID - Id de l'acheteur W8485-163201 5 126BF Client Ref. No. - N° de réf. du client File No. - N° du dossier CCC No./N° CCC - FMS No./N° VME W8485-163201A W8485-163201 The purpose of amendment #5 is to: 1. Answer questions 6 to 19 from the bidders 2. Include the SNAPS List for the CC115 Buffalo – Attached 3. Include document N0790F (NDTB) – Attached 4. At the RFP Annex I Delete: Annex I TECHNICAL EVALUATION PLAN FOR THE CC115 BUFFALO AIRCRAFT IN-SERVICE SUPPORT PROGRAM. Rev 1.0 Insert: Annex I TECHNICAL EVALUATION PLAN FOR THE CC115 BUFFALO AIRCRAFT IN-SERVICE SUPPORT PROGRAM. Rev 2.0 Please see below the answers to questions 6 to19: Question 6: Is it mandatory to be registered in the Control Goods Program? Reference: See RFP Terms and Conditions, articles 6.3, 7.26 & 7.27 Answer: A firm would not be disqualified for not being registered under the Controlled Goods Program at the time of bid closing. Proof of registration will be required by the Bidder and any Sub-contractors prior to contract award. The registration can take up to 45 days and your firm is encouraged to register sooner rather than later to avoid any delays associated with not being registered. Question 7: Would it be possible to provide our own training course and make it approved by transport Canada at a later date? Reference: Appendix 2 to Annex I Table 3.1 M3- Answer: The ATO does not need to specifically be approved for the DHC-5 aircraft. In order to meet this mandatory requirement, the bidder must demonstrate they are a TC approved ATO or have an agreement with a TC approved ATO at bid submission. The mandatory criteria (M3) has been amended. Question 8: Would it be possible for PSPC to provide the bidders with a copy of the SNAPS list so that we can provide our response as they pertain to the R&O support criteria in Appendix 3 to Annex I table 3.2? Reference: Appendix 3 to Annex I for Table 3.2, R&O Support Solicitation No. - N° de l'invitation Amd. No. - N° de la modif. Buyer ID - Id de l'acheteur W8485-163201 5 126BF Client Ref. No. - N° de réf. du client File No. - N° du dossier CCC No./N° CCC - FMS No./N° VME W8485-163201A W8485-163201 Answer: Please see component SNAPS list attached to amendment 5. Question 9: Reference DID CC115-003 10.1 – Lists “TAM Part 2 Chapter 4 Annex C Appendix 1” which is not allocated in C-05-005-001/AG-001 (TAM), is this requirement still valid? Answer: This requirement is still valid but not required for bid submission. This requirement will be discussed more in depth with the winning bidder and the DND airworthiness directorate once contract award has occurred. Question 10: Reference DID CC115-003 10.2 – Lists “TAM Part 1 Chapter 4 Annex A Appendix 1” which is deleted in C-05-005-001/AG-001 (TAM), is this requirement still valid? Answer: This requirement is still valid and bidders are advised to refer to the DND Technical Airworthiness Advisory (TAA) 2013-01, 2013-04 and 2016-04 for info on this requirement. Advisories can be found at http://www.forces.gc.ca/en/business-regulations-technical- airworthiness/advisories.page Question 11: Other Canadian Forces aircraft fleets have a Corrosion inspection manual with a data item identifier of VD-001. In this case, this manual was not included in the design data list provided by DND. However, we require it as part of the fixed firm price for BOP 1.3. Will this be provided to the bidders prior to submission? Reference: W8485-163201 Annex A Section 2.3 Answer: Although other fleets in the DND inventory have a specific corrosion inspection manual (VD-001), the CC115 does not have such a technical manual in its approved maintenance program. The CC115 corrosion mapping is performed in accordance with the C-12- 115-000/VC-000 (provided in the DDL) and in conjunction with industries best practices. Question 12: DND has removed the requirement for an OEM Letter of support. Considering this, will DND be approving all engineering performed on this platform? Reference: W8485-163201/A Amendment No. 003 Question Answer: On the onset of the contract award, DND will be the approving agency for all engineering changes. However once DND has had the opportunity to review the winning bidder's DAO certification and capabilities, some engineering responsibilities may be devolved to the bidder. Question 13: Transport Canada designates an organization as a Design Approval Organization (DAO) as opposed to an Accredited Design Organization (ADO) which is a DND Airworthiness term. Please clarify the mandatory criterion M2 which states “TC approved Accredited Design Organization (ADO) certification in accordance with TC Airworthiness Manual Chapter 505, must be provided at bid submission” Solicitation No. - N° de l'invitation Amd. No. - N° de la modif. Buyer ID - Id de l'acheteur W8485-163201 5 126BF Client Ref. No. - N° de réf. du client File No. - N° du dossier CCC No./N° CCC - FMS No./N° VME W8485-163201A W8485-163201 Reference: Annex I, Appendix 1, Table 1 Criteria M2 Answer: In order to meet this mandatory requirement, the bidder must demonstrate they are a Transport Canada (TC) approved Design Accredited Organization (DAO) at the time of bid submission. The mandatory criteria (M2) has been amended Question 14: We notice that there is no ITB or Value Proposition requirement included to this program. As the contract value could be in excess of $20M was there any reflection on the possibility of applying such a measure in the context of this process of acquiring R & Or services. If not can you please confirm that there will not be an ITB obligation applied at a later date to this program? Answer: The ITB policy does not apply to this procurement. Question 15: How many Life Cycle Support contractor held positions are currently working in DND facilities supporting the Buffalo? Answer: The embedded Life Cycle Support requirement has been defined in the Annex A Technical SOW. It is the bidder's responsibility to determine the level of effort required to support the defined requirement. Question 16: There is no line item in the Basis of Payment for the TI Task 3 – Manufacture/Assembly of Prototypes. Please confirm that this is still within the scope of this SOW? Reference: Technical SOW Annex A Section 5.1.4 TI Task 3 Answer: The TI Task 3 - manufacture/Assembly of prototypes is within the scope of this SOW. This requirement will be supported on an as needed basis and will be authorised via a task authorization (DND 626) based on rates as indicated in the BOP. Question 17: There is no line item in the Basis of Payment for the ES Task 6 – Program Management - is the intent that this work task be included in the Fix Firm Price of Basis of payment 1.1 to 1.6b? Technical SOW Annex A Section 5.2.2 ES Task 6 Answer: Task 6 - Program Management shall be included in the calculation for hourly rates Defined in Annex F - BASIS OF PAYMENT PROPOSED, 1.