DOCSLIB.ORG

BOTANIC GARDEN CREATION and MANAGEMENT: the FEASIBILITY and DESIGN of NEW BRITISH COLLECTIONS [On-Line Edition]

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
BOTANIC GARDEN CREATION and MANAGEMENT: the FEASIBILITY and DESIGN of NEW BRITISH COLLECTIONS [On-Line Edition] BOTANIC GARDEN CREATION AND MANAGEMENT: THE FEASIBILITY AND DESIGN OF NEW BRITISH COLLECTIONS [On-line Edition] PhD Thesis University of Reading School of Plant Sciences James Furse-Roberts [email protected] June 2005 Abstract Introduction Chapter 1 - Overview of Botanic Gardens Chapter 2 - Survey of British Botanical Collections Chapter 3 - Case Studies of Selected Botanic Collections Chapter 4 - Discussion of Botanic Collections Elements Chapter 5 - Design & Interpretation Chapter 6 - Eden Project Case Study Chapter 7 - Market Research Chapter 8 - Carymoor Case Study Chapter 9 - Alternative Solutions Chapter 10 - Conclusion Bibliography Appendix Botanic Garden Creation & Management Chapter 3 1 2 3 Case Studies of Selected Botanic Collections The previous chapter concluded by outlining the characteristics of the nine types of collection identified by the results of the botanical collections survey and identified three methods by which the collections in these groups obtain the majority of their funding (1 - government or local council, 2 - affiliated organisation, 3 - visitor admissions or sales). This chapter will examine the hypothesis that a collection’s history and its method of funding affect its character and roles. 3.1 Methodology The information included in the case studies of the ten botanical collections covered in this chapter was compiled from a variety of sources. These include the information gathered through the botanical collections survey (chapter 2), written material, including that on the organisations own website, and interviews with present or past members of staff. When possible, interviews took place at the interviewee’s place of work and, on average, lasted for one hour. They were conducted using what Robson (2002) defines as the ‘unstructured interview’ technique. This means that instead of using a set of predefined questions the interviewer starts the interview with a guide list of topics to be covered before the end of the interview. These topics varied depending on who was being interviewed and which collection they were associated with but all fell within the following areas; history of the collection, present management and funding, as well as the roles of the collection. The benefit of this style of interviewing is that it allows the interviewer to pick up and explore further items within the responses of the interviewees. This does mean that the results of every interview differ and it is therefore harder to use them for direct comparison or quantitative analysis but with such a small sample size recording the breadth of ideas held is more important. Ten collections were chosen as case studies for this section. For the purposes of this section the organisations were looked at as a whole, including satellite gardens if they have them. Four of these are botanic gardens (sensu stricto), four are university botanic gardens while the remaining two are examples of alternative approaches to holding botanical collections. Of the botanic gardens, The Royal Botanic Gardens at Kew and Edinburgh represent large government funded institutes; the National Botanic garden of Wales was included as it is one of the most recent attempts at establishing a botanical garden (the Eden Project is discussed separately in chapter 6). The Chelsea Physic Garden has been included as an example of an established non-government funded botanic garden. Of the four university botanic gardens, two, Oxford and Cambridge University Botanic Gardens, are representatives of those university botanic gardens that are open to the public and charge for entrance. Bristol University Botanic Garden is open to the public but does not charge for entrance while public access to the Harris Garden at the University of Reading is limited. The location of all the gardens discussed in this section and their satellite gardens are illustrated in Figure 3.1. © James Furse-Roberts 57 Botanic Garden Creation & Management Chapter 3 Figure 3.1 - Map of Britain showing the location of those botanical collections reviewed in chapter 3 © James Furse-Roberts 58 Botanic Garden Creation & Management Chapter 3 3.2 Botanic Gardens 3.2.1 Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, London Date Founded: 1759 Size: 324-hectares (800-acres) Annual Budget: £29,000,000 Number of Species: 30,000 Number of Visitors: 1,000,000 p.a. Kew Bedgebury Wakehurst Gardens Pinetum Place 1750 1759 1775 1800 1825 1850 1875 1900 1924 1950 1965 1975 2000 Figure 3.2 - Timeline showing the use of different gardens by the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew Ray Desmond (1995) in his book ‘Kew: The History of the Royal Botanic Gardens’ gives a detailed account of the events at Kew between 1631 and 1994, from which the following synopsis was made. In addition to this interviews with Gail Bromley, head of education, and Katy Steel, from the interpretation unit, give an insight into how Kew delivers the educational section of its mission. 1759 - William Aiton recruited from Chelsea Physic Garden to manage the physic garden at Kew 1772 - Kew’s first collector, Francis Masson, sent to the Cape of South Africa 1789 - 1st edition of Index Kewensis published following Linnaean taxonomy 1838 - Government threatens Kew with closure 1840 - Threat of closure finally abated 1848 - First economic botany museum opened in what is now Museum No. II 1851 - The Pleasure Grounds, the area outside the botanic garden, starts to be converted into an arboretum. © James Furse-Roberts 59 Botanic Garden Creation & Management Chapter 3 1858 - New acquisitions required the building of an additional museum, now Museum No. I 1916 - Mon, Wed, Thur, Sat Entrance charge1d, Student days Tue + Fri 6d Sunday Free 1924 - 1d Entrance charge abolished but 6d for student days maintained 1926 - 1d Entrance charge reintroduced 1929 - 1d Entrance charge abolished 1931 - 1d Entrance charge reintroduced 1938 - Standing Commission on Museums and Galleries recommend the abolition of 6d charge for student days 1944 - British flora extended with chalk garden on east side of the icehouse 1949 - Australian house gifted to Kew by the Australian Government following a visit their by the director. 1951 - Morton agreement divides the world between Kew and the National History Museum. Entrance charge increased to 3d; student day charge abolished 1957 - MAFF request that a Committee (Ashby Visiting Group) is set up to report on issues specifically affecting Kew. 1958 - Work done in preparation for the Royal visit in 1959 to celebrate Kew’s bicentenary 1959 - Royal visit to celebrate Kew’s bicentenary. Wood museum removed from the Orangery so that the latter could be returned to its original use. 1960 - First guide-lecturer appointed 1963 - Three-year diploma launched 1965 - Kew acquires the management of Wakehurst Place to extend the range of plants that could be grown. 1971 - Keeping plants in the Orangery was speeding up the spread of dry rot so it was converted into a visitor orientation centre. Scanning electron microscopes installed in 49 The Green and Jodrell. With decimalisation the 3d entrance charge became 1p. 1973 - Roof of temperate house became unsafe so it was closed to the public 1975 - Kew hosts their first conservation conference (Minter 2000) 1977 - Temperate house restoration begins improving the roof/heating and re-landscaping the interior. Plants replant geographically. Standing commission on museums and galleries approves the sitting of a new museum between the herbarium and Kew palace. © James Furse-Roberts 60 Botanic Garden Creation & Management Chapter 3 1980 - Entrance charge 10p 1982 - Temperate house reopened to the public 1983 - Entrance charge 15p 1984 - Work begins on the Princess of Wales conservatory 1984 - On the 1st of April responsibility for the garden was passed from MAFF to the trustees 1985 - Work begins on the Banks building. Entrance charge 25p 1987 - Princess of Wales Conservatory opens to the public. Entrance charge 50p 1986 - Kew ceases to be the intermediate quarantine station 1989 - Entrance charge £1 1990 – Prof. Prance set up Kew Foundation whose sole objective is to raise money for Kew (£2million a year). Entrance charge £3. Banks building opened 1992 - Entrance charge £3.30 1993 - Entrance charge £3.50 1994 - Entrance charge £4. Kew commissioned its first television commercial. Evolution House opened. 2005 – Entrance charge adults £10, children up to and including 16 years free (RBG Kew Website 2005) The Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, is not the oldest botanic garden in Britain but is probably the best known and certainly has the largest annual budget. Kew’s collection is held at two sites; Kew Gardens, located in Richmond, Surrey, consists of 136-hectares (336-acres) and Wakehurst Place, Kew’s satellite garden in West Sussex, has 188-hectares (465-acres). As is shown in the chronological history above, Kew gardens carries a royal title because it originated from a private garden in a royal palace. This origin, as a private garden that later took on a more public role, makes it difficult to place a date on the garden’s foundation. However, the commonly accepted date is 1759, the year in which William Aiton was recruited from the Chelsea Physic Garden to manage a small area of the palace grounds referred to as the physic garden. As has been described in the first chapter of this thesis, the first half of the eighteenth century was a transitional period between the old physic garden style and the new taxonomic and imperial gardens. The physic garden at Kew was not untouched by these changes and within its first thirty years had sent out plant collecting expeditions, arranged its collection taxonomically and created a catalogue of the species held. In 1771 Joseph Banks was returned from his voyage with Captain Cook on the Endeavour with many new species, which were presented to the King. This marks the beginning of Banks’s role as advisor to the King George III and the start of his role in “making it [Kew] a central © James Furse-Roberts 61 Botanic Garden Creation & Management Chapter 3 clearing house for an imperial trade in agricultural development” (Fara 2003).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Assessment of Plant Diversity for Threat Elements: a Case Study of Nargu Wildlife Sanctuary, North Western Himalaya
    Ceylon Journal of Science 46(1) 2017: 75-95 DOI: http://doi.org/10.4038/cjs.v46i1.7420 RESEARCH ARTICLE Assessment of plant diversity for threat elements: A case study of Nargu wildlife sanctuary, north western Himalaya Pankaj Sharma*, S.S. Samant and Manohar Lal G.B. Pant National Institute of Himalayan Environment and Sustainable Development, Himachal Unit, Mohal- Kullu-175126, H.P., India Received: 12/07/2016; Accepted: 16/02/2017 Abstract: Biodiversity crisis is being experienced losses, over exploitation, invasions of non-native throughout the world, due to various anthropogenic species, global climate change (IUCN, 2003) and and natural factors. Therefore, it is essential to disruption of community structure (Novasek and identify suitable conservation priorities in biodiversity Cleland, 2001). As a result of the anthropogenic rich areas. For this myriads of conservational pressure, the plant extinction rate has reached approaches are being implemented in various ecosystems across the globe. The present study has to137 species per day (Mora et al., 2011; Tali et been conducted because of the dearth of the location- al., 2015). At present, the rapid loss of species is specific studies in the Indian Himalayas for assessing estimated to be between 1,000–10,000 times the ‘threatened species’. The threat assessment of faster than the expected natural extinction rate plant species in the Nargu Wildlife Sanctuary (NWS) (Hilton-Taylor, 2000). Under the current of the northwest Himalaya was investigated using scenario, about 20% of all species are likely to Conservation Priority Index (CPI) during the present go extinct within next 30 years and more than study.
    [Show full text]
  • Establishment of a Global Network for the in Situ Conservation of Crop Wild Relatives: Status and Needs
    THEMATIC BACKGROUND STUDY Establishment of a Global Network for the In Situ Conservation of Crop Wild Relatives: Status and Needs Nigel Maxted and Shelagh Kell BACKGROUND STUDY PAPER NO. 39 October 2009 COMMISSION ON GENETIC RESOURCES FOR FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ESTABLISHMENT OF A GLOBAL NETWORK FOR THE IN SITU CONSERVATION OF CROP WILD RELATIVES: STATUS AND NEEDS by *By Nigel Maxted and Shelagh Kell The content of this document is entirely the responsibility of the authors, and does not .necessarily represent the views of the FAO, or its Members 2 * School of Biosciences, University of Birmingham. Disclaimer The content of this document is entirely the responsibility of the authors, and does not necessarily represent the views of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), or its Members. The designations employed and the presentation of material do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of FAO concerning legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. CONTENTS SUMMARY 6 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 7 PART 1: INTRODUCTION 8 1.1 Background and scope 8 1.2 The global and local importance of crop wild relatives 10 1.3 Definition of a crop wild relative 12 1.4 Global numbers of crop
    [Show full text]
  • BRITISH BOTANICAL GARDENS in the 1980S
    BRITISH BOTANICAL GARDENS IN THE 1980s: CHANGES REFLECTED BY BIBLIOGRAPHICAL AND SOCIAL SURVEY Enid Constance Gilberthorpe Thesis submitted fox' the degree of PhD University of Sheffield Division of Education January 1987 cONTEN'rs PAGE NUMBER List of Contents :1. List of Illustrations 111 Acknowledgements iv Summary vi CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION: AIMS AND SCOPE I 2 KEY DOCUMENTS 27 3 PLANTS FOR TEACHING, AND FOR RESEARCH: 42 teaching of botany; supplies of plant material; research into taxonomy; experimental botany 4 ECONOMIC BOTANY - plants with domestic 57 and medicinal uses and of commercial importance 5 HORTICULTURE: the acquisition and 74 cultivation of plants in botanical gardens 6 AMENITY: plants for pleasure and 97 interest 7 PUBLIC INFORMATION AND EDUCATION ilk SERVICES; PUBLIC RECREATION FACILITIES 1. CHAPTER PAGE NUMBER 8 CONSERVATION: wild and cultivated 139 plants in danger 9 BOTANICAL GARDENS OPEN TO THE PUBLIC; 188 GUIDES TO THE GARDENS - PRINTED PUBLICITY; ILLUSTRATIONS FROM THE GUIDE S 10 FUNCTIONS OF GARDENS - THE PROBLEM 220 OF OVERLAP 11 SHEFFIELD BOTANICAL GARDENS 242 12 BOTANICAL GARDENS IN BRITISH 'TWINNED' 2.7 TOWNS - ANY INTERACTION WITH THEIR EUROPEAN PARTNERS? 13 PUBLIC VIEWS ON BOTANICAL GARDENS - 287 A SAMPLE SURVEY 14 GARDENS NOW AND IN THE FUTURE - 294 POSSIBLE DEVELOPMENTS BIBLIOGRAPHY 328 ILLUSTRATIONS (between pages 219 and 220) National 1. Edinburgh Royal Botanic Garden: Rock Garden Pond. 2. Kew Royal Botanic Gardens: Palm House with spring bedding. 3. Westonbirt Arboretum (Forestry Commission): the memorial sarsen stone on Mitchell Drive. University L&. Cambridge University Botanic Garden: [view of Garden shown on front of folding leaflet]. 5. Ness Gardens (University of Liverpool): a late summer scene in the Heather Garden.
    [Show full text]
  • Australian Orchidaceae: Genera and Species (12/1/2004)
    AUSTRALIAN ORCHID NAME INDEX (21/1/2008) by Mark A. Clements Centre for Plant Biodiversity Research/Australian National Herbarium GPO Box 1600 Canberra ACT 2601 Australia Corresponding author: [email protected] INTRODUCTION The Australian Orchid Name Index (AONI) provides the currently accepted scientific names, together with their synonyms, of all Australian orchids including those in external territories. The appropriate scientific name for each orchid taxon is based on data published in the scientific or historical literature, and/or from study of the relevant type specimens or illustrations and study of taxa as herbarium specimens, in the field or in the living state. Structure of the index: Genera and species are listed alphabetically. Accepted names for taxa are in bold, followed by the author(s), place and date of publication, details of the type(s), including where it is held and assessment of its status. The institution(s) where type specimen(s) are housed are recorded using the international codes for Herbaria (Appendix 1) as listed in Holmgren et al’s Index Herbariorum (1981) continuously updated, see [http://sciweb.nybg.org/science2/IndexHerbariorum.asp]. Citation of authors follows Brummit & Powell (1992) Authors of Plant Names; for book abbreviations, the standard is Taxonomic Literature, 2nd edn. (Stafleu & Cowan 1976-88; supplements, 1992-2000); and periodicals are abbreviated according to B-P- H/S (Bridson, 1992) [http://www.ipni.org/index.html]. Synonyms are provided with relevant information on place of publication and details of the type(s). They are indented and listed in chronological order under the accepted taxon name. Synonyms are also cross-referenced under genus.
    [Show full text]
  • The Local Landscape Landscape Character Reach No 11: SYON
    154 Thames Landscape Strategy: The Local Landscape Landscape Character Reach No 11: SYON LANDSCAPE CHARACTER The Syon Reach is bordered by two of the most significant designed landscapes in Britain. Royal patronage at Richmond and Kew inspired some of the initial influential works of Bridgeman, Kent and Chambers. The current layouts of Syon and the Royal Botanic Gardens are still basically the work of Lancelot Brown and William Nesfield. Syon Park is still essentially a Capability Brown landscape. The ha-ha, water meadows and tree clumps survive, though advancing willow and poplar scrub growth have merged the clumps, obliterated much of the meadow and blocked views to the river. An aerial photograph from as recently as the 1920s shows the 18th-century landscape intact. The imposing house, with the lion The Nesfield Avenues in the Royal Botanic The Nesfield Avenues in the Royal Botanic silhouetted on the roof, is now only revealed by a single narrowing window Gardens, Kew focus onto the Syon vista. This 1920s photo shows the traditional through the scrub. The channels of the water meadow have become blocked management of Syon Park, maintaining the open and the clay land drains are steadily eroding away into the Thames. tide meadow and Capability Brown tree clumps The Countryside Commission, English Nature and English Heritage are currently working with Syon Park to re-instate the tide meadow, the Capability Brown clumps and the visual connections to Kew and the river. Syon Park Limited has commissioned a landscape masterplan to advise on the management of the historic landscape and the layout and organisation of visitor facilities, parking and public access.
    [Show full text]
  • Exotic Forest Trees in Great Britain
    FORESTRY COMMISSION BULLETIN No. 30 Exotic Forest Trees in Great Britain Paper prepared for the British Commonwealth Forestry Conference Australia and New Zealand 1957 LONDON: HER MAJESTY’S STATIONERY OFFICE PRICE 17s. 6d. NET Forestry Commission ARCHIVE FORESTRY COMMISSION BULLETIN NO. 30 FORESTRY COMMISSION — BULLETIN No. 30 EXOTIC FOREST TREES in GREAT BRITAIN ERRATA Page 5. Second column, penultimate paragraph : For: “Quercus ilex” read: “Quercus cerris” P age 25. First column, last paragraph, fourth line from fo ot : For: “pseudofibrous” read: “fibrous” As above but third line from foot : For: “fibrous” read: “pseudofibrous” LONDON: HER MAJESTY’S STATIONERY OFFICE 1957 FORESTRY COMMISSION BULLETIN NO. 30 EXOTIC FOREST TREES IN GREAT BRITAIN Paper prepared for the Seventh British Commonwealth Forestry Conference, Australia and New Zealand, 1957 Edited by James M a c d o n a l d , R. F. W o o d , M. V. E d w a r d s , and J. R. A ldhous Forestry Commission LONDON: HER MAJESTY’S STATIONERY OFFICE 1957 FOREWORD The Sixth Commonwealth Forestry Conference, at to do so with the information at our dis­ its meeting in Canada in 1952, accepted a recommen­ posal ; but there is, inevitably, some unevenness in dation made by its Committee on Forest Manage­ the treatment of species in this class. As for the ment, Silviculture and Forest Protection which was others, we have given separate notes on those exotic expressed in the following words: trees which have been tried occasionally in small ‘ A detailed account of the use of exotic plots or plantations and of which we have a record, species in the Commonwealth, based partly on but we are conscious that this method of procedure information supplied to the Third British Empire has led to the inclusion of some trees of no con­ Conference, was given by the late Professor sequence at all, solely because someone has planted R.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Area Study Kew Road No.55, Kew Gardens No.15 & Lawn Crescent No.20
    LONDON BOROUGH OF RICHMOND UPON THAMES Conservation Area Study Kew Road no.55, Kew Gardens no.15 & Lawn Crescent no.20 Conservation areas were introduced in the Civic Amenities Act 1967 and are defined as areas of ' special architectural or historic interest, the character or appearance of which it is desirable to preserve or enhance'. Designation introduces a general control over the demolition of unlisted buildings and the felling or lopping of trees above a certain size. The objective of a conservation area study is to provide a clearly defined analysis of the character and appearance of the conservation area, defensible on appeal, to assist in development control decisions. Further, to address issues, which have been identified in the character appraisal process, for the enhancement or preservation of the conservation area. It is hoped that the process of the study and the finished document will stimulate public participation. Kew There are three distinct regions within Kew. The first, around the Green, relates to the River and quay. The second, which includes most of the Botanic Gardens and all the land east towards the railway, was seen as north Richmond until the 1890s. The third area, between the railway and the Lower Mortlake Road, was until recently seen as part of Mortlake. The study of the first area is covered by the Kew Green Conservation Area Study. The second area is covered, in four parts, by the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Conservation Area and by the Kew Road, Kew Gardens and Lawn Crescent Conservation Area Studies. The Kew Foot Road and Sheendale Road Conservation Areas are the subject of a further study.
    [Show full text]
  • Plants and the Paranormal
    University of Northern Iowa UNI ScholarWorks CSBS INSPIRE Student Research & Engagement 2020 INSPIRE Student Research & Engagement Conference Showcase Apr 17th, 12:00 PM - 4:00 PM Plants and the Paranormal Natalie Aird University of Northern Iowa Ellie Wigginton University of Northern Iowa Let us know how access to this document benefits ouy Copyright ©2020 Natalie Aird Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.uni.edu/csbsresearchconf Recommended Citation Aird, Natalie and Wigginton, Ellie, "Plants and the Paranormal" (2020). CSBS INSPIRE Student Research & Engagement Conference. 20. https://scholarworks.uni.edu/csbsresearchconf/2020/all/20 This Open Access Poster Presentation is brought to you for free and open access by the Conferences/Events at UNI ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in CSBS INSPIRE Student Research & Engagement Conference by an authorized administrator of UNI ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. KEW GARDENS, LONDON, ENGLAND NATALIE AIRD -AND- ELLIE WIGGINTON BRIEF HISTORY SUPERNATURAL OCCURRENCES ALIENS AT KEW OUR TIME AT KEW GARDENS Kew Gardens is located in the borough Richmond upon Thames. According to an article on Kew’s website, there are several In 2002, a giant crop circle in the center of a wheatfield We visited Kew Gardens on Sunday, June 16th. Fortunately, we The site was originally a royal estate acquired by Frederick Louis, supernatural things that have happened at the Royal Botanic appeared. It was perfectly symmetrical and roughly 60 feet wide were able to enjoy a sunny day at Kew! Our first stop was the Prince of Wales, in 1731. His wife, Princess Augusta established Gardens.
    [Show full text]
  • The World Checklist of Vascular Plants, a Continuously Updated
    www.nature.com/scientificdata OPEN The World Checklist of Vascular DATA DescripTOR Plants, a continuously updated resource for exploring global plant diversity Rafaël Govaerts , Eimear Nic Lughadha ✉, Nicholas Black, Robert Turner & Alan Paton The World Checklist of Vascular Plants (WCVP) is a comprehensive list of scientifcally described plant species, compiled over four decades, from peer-reviewed literature, authoritative scientifc databases, herbaria and observations, then reviewed by experts. It is a vital tool to facilitate plant diversity research, conservation and efective management, including sustainable use and equitable sharing of benefts. To maximise utility, such lists should be accessible, explicitly evidence-based, transparent, expert-reviewed, and regularly updated, incorporating new evidence and emerging scientifc consensus. WCVP largely meets these criteria, being continuously updated and freely available online. Users can browse, search, or download a user-defned subset of accepted species with corresponding synonyms and bibliographic details, or a date-stamped full dataset. To facilitate appropriate data reuse by individual researchers and global initiatives including Global Biodiversity Information Facility, Catalogue of Life and World Flora Online, we document data collation and review processes, the underlying data structure, and the international data standards and technical validation that ensure data quality and integrity. We also address the questions most frequently received from users. Background & Summary Te World Checklist of Vascular Plants (WCVP, http://wcvp.science.kew.org/) is a sustainable, curated, global consensus view of all known vascular plant species (fowering plants, conifers, cycads, ferns, clubmosses and fr- mosses). It is derived from names and taxonomic concept resources managed at the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew (hereafer Kew) by reconciling names to taxon concepts, to produce a comprehensive taxonomic compilation for vascular plants.
    [Show full text]
  • CULTIVATING COLONIALISM: the Musealisation of Natural Objects in the Hortus Botanicus, Amsterdam, and the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew
    CULTIVATING COLONIALISM The musealisation of natural objects in the Hortus Botanicus, Amsterdam, and the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew EVIE EVANS CULTIVATING COLONIALISM: The musealisation of natural objects in the Hortus Botanicus, Amsterdam, and the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. A thesis presented by Evie Evans 11200642 Submitted to the Faculty of Humanities University of Amsterdam In Fulfilment of the Requirements for the degree Master of the Arts Heritage Studies: Museum Studies January 2021 Thesis Supervisor: Ihab Saloul Second Reader: Dos Elshout Cultivating Colonialism Evans TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT 4 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 5 INTRODUCTION 6 Preface 6 The Colonial History of Botanical Gardens 7 Botanical Gardens as Heterotopias 9 Musealisation and Narratology 11 Decolonial Methodology 13 Hortus Botanicus, Amsterdam and Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 14 CHAPTER ONE 19 “To name and know”: the scientific and colonial musealisation of plants 19 The botanical garden as imperial debris 20 The Three-Climate Greenhouse as imperial debris 23 Scientific narratives in the Three-Climate Greenhouse 25 The Temperate House as imperial debris 32 Scientific Knowledge in The Temperate House 33 CHAPTER TWO 39 “The ever present”: the modern/colonial representation of time in botanical garden greenhouses 39 Representations of time and imperial debris 40 Representations of time: the ever-present 45 Representations of time: the accumulation of time 46 Living fossils, stuck in time: the representation of cycads 49 “Flux”: a slippage into the past, present and future of botanical gardens 53 CONCLUSION: 58 The colonial future of botanical gardens 58 APPENDIX 62 WORKS CITED 63 IMAGES CITED 70 3 Cultivating Colonialism Evans ABSTRACT This Master’s thesis analyses botanical gardens from a museological perspective, as subject to similar processes of collection and exhibition, and decolonial critique, as museums.
    [Show full text]
  • Explore Kew Gardens and Wakehurst
    Something to see in every season Spring an imitate introduction to its most famous resident, King George III, As the days get longer and the and his family (see page 3). temperature rises, Kew comes alive with colour. Vibrant daffodils, dreamy Autumn bluebells and charming cherry trees are just some of the highlights of See every stunning shade of autumn the season. Stroll between the Great colour – from fiery reds to warm Broad Walk Borders to see bulbs at oranges and glowing yellows. One of their best (see page 5). the most spectacular spots is the This year, Dale Chihuly, the most Sackler Crossing, from where you can celebrated contemporary glass artist admire the reflections of transforming in the world, will bring his work to trees in the lake (see page 5). Kew from 13 April to 27 October. As the temperature drops, head to Chihuly at Kew: Reflections on the Shirley Sherwood and Marianne nature will feature unique artworks North galleries to warm up beneath in spectacular locations including beautiful botanical art (see page 6). glasshouses, vistas and galleries (see page 7). Winter From late November until the New Summer Year, join us after dark for a magical Discover the extraordinary life of light trail through the Gardens. bees in The Hive. Set in a beautiful Christmas at Kew will fill you with wildflower meadow, which is at its festive cheer, with spectacular loveliest in summer, this incredible sparkles, tempting treats and structure hums and glows, echoing gorgeous gifts (see page 8). activity in a real bee hive at Kew Winter blues getting you down? (see page 4).
    [Show full text]
  • AUSTRALIAN ORCHID NAME INDEX (27/4/2006) by Mark A. Clements
    AUSTRALIAN ORCHID NAME INDEX (27/4/2006) by Mark A. Clements and David L. Jones Centre for Plant Biodiversity Research/Australian National Herbarium GPO Box 1600 Canberra ACT 2601 Australia Corresponding author: [email protected] INTRODUCTION The Australian Orchid Name Index (AONI) provides the currently accepted scientific names, together with their synonyms, of all Australian orchids including those in external territories. The appropriate scientific name for each orchid taxon is based on data published in the scientific or historical literature, and/or from study of the relevant type specimens or illustrations and study of taxa as herbarium specimens, in the field or in the living state. Structure of the index: Genera and species are listed alphabetically. Accepted names for taxa are in bold, followed by the author(s), place and date of publication, details of the type(s), including where it is held and assessment of its status. The institution(s) where type specimen(s) are housed are recorded using the international codes for Herbaria (Appendix 1) as listed in Holmgren et al’s Index Herbariorum (1981) continuously updated, see [http://sciweb.nybg.org/science2/IndexHerbariorum.asp]. Citation of authors follows Brummit & Powell (1992) Authors of Plant Names; for book abbreviations, the standard is Taxonomic Literature, 2nd edn. (Stafleu & Cowan 1976-88; supplements, 1992-2000); and periodicals are abbreviated according to B-P-H/S (Bridson, 1992) [http://www.ipni.org/index.html]. Synonyms are provided with relevant information on place of publication and details of the type(s). They are indented and listed in chronological order under the accepted taxon name.
    [Show full text]