DOCSLIB.ORG

The Second World War Was Carried out in All the Waters Surrounding All Continents. Because of That, the Conflict of 1939-1945 Tu

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Second World War Was Carried out in All the Waters Surrounding All Continents. Because of That, the Conflict of 1939-1945 Tu ȁDzǸ 3555.48:359:94 «1939/1945» MACIEJ FRANZ13 ROLE AND IMPORTANCE OF THE MEDITERRANEAN THEATER OF WARFARE IN THE YEARS 1939-1945 The article examines the role and significance of the Mediterranean theater of war during World War II. This issue did not find appropriate elucidation in world historiography, in contradistinction to the history of the war on the Atlantic and Pacific oceans. Provided a retrospective review of the interests of Great Britain, France, Italy, Greece, Spain, Turkey, Yugoslavia and other countries in the region through the prism geopolitical importance of the Mediterranean basin. Strategic plans and actions of allies on the anti-Hitler coalition and states of Axis on the Mediterranean during the years 1939 – 1945, the position of their naval forces and aviation was analyzed. Significant attention paid to the combat actions of opponents for such objects as Malta, Suez Canal, Gibraltar and others like that. The author convinces that without the victory of the Allies in North Africa, occupation of the Mediterranean Sea and offensive on the Apennine Peninsula between 1944 and 1945 would have been impossible for their victory at the Western Front, also would be another course of battles on the Eastern Front. Keywords: aviation, navy, Gibraltar, World War II, Malta, the Mediterranean Sea, Suez Canal. The Second World War was carried out in all the waters surrounding all continents. Because of that, the conflict of 1939-1945 turned out to be a global event in its dimension. The military operations in the Atlantic Ocean and the Pacific definitely signed up in the historical memory [1]. Battle of the Atlantic perceived as a fear of German submarines trying to break up the lines of communication between the American continent and ports in the UK, has become, for many of the historians, the most important maritime war theater of World War (The best proof of this is one of the most famous studies in this respect, Clay Blair, see CC. Blair, Hitlerawojna u-bootów, cz. 1, MyĤliwi 1939-1942, Warszawa 1998, cz. 2, ģcigani 1942-1945, Warszawa 1999. 13ȂȞȎțȤǺȎȤȓȗ, ȒȜȘȠȜȞȑȎȏȳșȳȠȜȐȎțȖȗ, ȝȞȜȢȓȟȜȞ, ȁțȳȐȓȞȟȖȠȓȠȳȚȓțȳ ǮȒȎȚȎǺȳȤȘȓȐȖȥȎȐǽȜȕțȎțȳ (ǽȜșȪȟȪȘȎǾȓȟȝȡȏșȳȘȎ). © ȂȞȎțȤǺ., 2017 182 Perfectly it can also be seen on the example of the recently published book by Jonathan Dimbleby'a,Battle of the Atlantic.As the Allies won World War II, Warsaw 2017 that actually is dedicated to only the war against the German submarine fleet). It was commonly said that this was the longest, most important battle of the war, and the victory for the Allies was decisive for the ability not only to survive the offensive of the fascist countries but mainly to prepare and take offensive in Western Europe known in history as «Second Front». The Pacific War, for European historians, is less important as a side theater and definitely secondary to what was happening at the European theater of warfare. It was even emphasized when discussing the terms of subsequent meetings and conferences, not only the Great Trinity, but also bilateral Anglo-American arrangements. This is completely wrong look, lowering a huge commitment of US forces in another offensive in the Pacific (Vastness of American involvement in activities even at Iwo-Jima can be seen perfectly in the development E. Hammel, Iwo Jima, Warszawa 2009. It is worth mentioning that while American troops landed on this island, the offensive of Anglo-American and Allied forces in France and the Apennine was taking place. This also shows how great was the commitment of the United States during the Second World War). United States were able not only to support Britain or the Soviet Union in the war against the Third Reich (Without the support of the American or British, the victory of the Red Army would not have been possible. Still, during the Berlin assault, one of the Soviet Armored Guard Guards fought with only equipment acquired from the Allies under the «Land less act» agreement), but also to break the power of the Empire of Japan on their own. The Pacific War was much more complicated and definitely bloodier than the Atlantic. It shows very well for many years in major studies prepared by the American historians [2]. In the shade of these water areas and the warfare carried on them remains the Mediterranean Sea. It didn’t come by its proper recognition and appreciation of the role it has played during the Second World War [3]. For many historians, 183 the Mediterranean region is a minor operating theater, which has not played a decisive time in the five years of war [4]. Truly, the fighting was conducted here from September 1939 to the beginning of May 1945, but they are not seen as having a decisive impact on the course of the war.In the meantime, it was in the Mediterranean area that the interests of the Fascist and Allied states crossed over for months, and the most intense warfare was being conducted there. On September 3 1939 when the war Polish-German was joined by Britain and France, realizing their allied commitments (Mainly it was the result of an alliance concluded 25 August 1939 with Great Britain, France because, although the related treaty allies already in 1921, in 1939 to join the war no longer wanted. It was very popular in France in those days «N 'est pa mourir pour le Gdaęsk»). This meant that the conflict that had so far been a local war was becoming a world conflict. This was due to the geopolitical position of the Mediterranean and its crossing not only of political interests, but mainly of economic affairs. The main part of pre-war British trade routes was exactly passing through the Mediterranean waters, and it made these waters such an important and strategic reservoir.The geopolitical profile of the Mediterranean Sea was defined as the main marine bases of potential opponents who had already competed with each other during the period of peace in controlling these waters. It is the layout of these bases that determines the actions of all states that have access to the Mediterranean Sea. War accidents in 1939-1945 made up that the United Kingdom, France and Italy have become an important factors in this region. Definitely they have less significance Greece, Yugoslavia, Spain or even Turkey, although the last one significantly stabilized the eastern shores of the watershed, and was clearly separating from the waters of the Black Sea (After the First World War, a new secular Turkish government, led by Kemal Atat Turk, carried out the necessary reforms, but the Navy was still very weak. Turkey did not intend to make a mistake from the previous World War, and this time it was not drawn into war.Spain after the civil war 184 was very weakened, and despite the establishment of General Franco's government in favor of fascist states, the government of Francisco Franco also maintained neutrality in 1939-1945. Greece and Yugoslavia could play strategically important roles in the Mediterranean, but they were too economically and militarily too small to play this role.Eventually they became only the subject of a great game). It was important for the Mediterranean Sea to have control over the regions that connect this watercourse with other surrounding areas. From the west for centuries this role was played by Gibraltar, since the eighteenth century located in the hands of the UK (J.W. Gerard Peace of Utrecht. Historical Review of the great treaty from 1713 to 1714 and of the principal events of the war of the Spanish succession, New York-London 1885). This allowed not only to control all the forces entering the Mediterranean Sea from the Atlantic, but also to block any attempt of enemy ships trying to leave the Mediterranean Sea. During World War II, Gibraltar played a strategic role in the British fleet. Not only was it able to take over the French tasks, after the defeat of that country in June 1940, but also to block the Italian fleet. Only single submarines of the Italian Navy managed to pass through the Straits of Gibraltar and join the German forces fighting in the Atlantic (Italian submarines mainly operated from the base of Bordeaux, forming combat team «BETASOM ௅ XI Gruppo Sommergibili Atlantici». They operated from August 1940 to September 1943, when the Italian state surrendered to Allied forces. Actually, however, some Italian crews still decided to fight at the side of the Third Reich and, as part of the naval forces of the Italian Social Republic, Salo, continued to serve in the Atlantic). The possible departure of the Italian navy to ocean waters could have led to a complete change in the Atlantic war. The fact that such a risk has never been real was because of the British domination of Gibraltar. At the same time from this base they were sent warships to both actions pursuit against the «Bismarck» (Seeeven B.F. von Müllenheim-Rechberg, Pancernik «Bismarck», Gdaęsk 2000 and M. Skwiot, T. Prusinowska, Operacja Rheinubung. 185 Polowaniena Bismarcka, Gdaęsk 2004), support Atlantic convoys, while still running new convoys towards Malta, whose survival against the Italian-German offensive, fortunately for the Allies mainly air, was one of the most important tasks for the Royal Navy for long war months (Malta, which is now an independent state, was for many years one of the most important base for the British Navy. And this often came to a fight in her defense). The opening of the Suez Canal contributed to a sharp increase in the importance of the Mediterranean and caused that a substantial majority of the British transport routes from the Asian region, from that moment no longer went around Africa, but exactly by the canal and Mediterranean waters (Suez Canal was the result of work of the Anglo-French consortium.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • L'occupazione Militare Imperialista
    ANNO XXII - N. 3 (67) SETTEMBRE - NOVEMBRE 2008 DELLA FONDAZIONE DELLA R.S.I. - ISTITUTO STORICO Reg. Trib. Arezzo 5/87 - 21 Aprile 1987 Sped. A.P. Legge 46/2004 art. 1, comma 1 e 2 - Filiale Bologna Direttore responsabile Arturo Conti 61 ANNI FA CESSO’ L’OCCUPAZIONE MILITARE IMPERIALISTA a più rilevante coda alla data ufficiale di ritiro delle Truppe vincitrici in Italia fissata dal Senato USA (15 dicembre 1947), fu Lal Confine Orientale dove l’addio angloamericano del 26 ottobre 1954 coincise con la cessione agli slavi dell’ex Zona B del mai nato Territorio Libero di Trieste. Cessione purtroppo ampliata (11,5 Kmq in estensione, 5 mila in abitanti) ad Albaro Vescovà, Crevatini, Plavia, S. Servolo e Valle Oltra. La guerra, conclusa nel 1945 con la Resa di Caserta, era stata archiviata nel 1947 con il Trattato di Pace, duramente commentato nel 1952 da Attilio Tamaro in 297 pagine, due delle quali (148-149) in parte riprodu- ciamo (doc. A). I Combattenti dell’Onore (doc. B) e le loro famiglie subirono massacri e prigionie, epurazione e miseria, ma anche l’Italia pagò un alto prezzo alla vendicativa Francia e soprattutto alla barbara comunista Jugoslavia (doc.C). A B C SETTEMBRE - NOVEMBRE 2008 — 2 — LE CONQUISTE DELLA FRANCIA E La difesa RSI del Confine con la Francia (ACTA n. 39, 48, 51, 60), nel dopoguerra è in parte resa vana dal CLN. Colle di Tenda, da Sud I 560 Kmq dei Comuni di Briga e di Tenda compresi i Forti a Sud del Colle (1902 m) e zone contigue, non più territorio italiano dal 16 settembre 1947 (ACTA n.
    [Show full text]
  • Osprey Publishing, Elms Court, Chapel Way, Botley, Oxford OX2 9LP, United Kingdom
    WOLF PACK The Story of the U-Boat in World War II The Story - oat iq-Workd War 11 First published in Great Britain in 2005 by Osprey Publishing, Elms Court, Chapel Way, Botley, Oxford OX2 9LP, United Kingdom. Email: [email protected] Previously published as New Vanguard 51: Kriegsmarine U-boats 1939-45 (1); New Vanguard 55: Kriegsmarine U-boats 1939-45 (2); and Warrior 36: Grey Wolf. © 2005 Osprey Publishing Ltd. All rights reserved. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study, research, criticism or review, as permitted under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act, 1988, no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, electrical, chemical, mechanical, optical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the copyright owner. Enquiries should be addressed to the Publishers. CIP data for this publication is available from the British Library. ISBN 1 84176 872 3 Editors: Anita Hitchings and Ruth Sheppard Design: Ken Vail Graphic Design, Cambridge, UK Artwork by Ian Palmer and Darko Pavlovic Index by Alan Thatcher Originated by The Electronic Page Company, Cwmbran, UK Printed and bound by L-Rex Printing Company Ltd 05 06 07 08 09 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 FOR A CATALOGUE OF ALL BOOKS PUBLISHED BY OSPREY PLEASE CONTACT: NORTH AMERICA Osprey Direct, 2427 Bond Street, University Park, IL 60466, USA E-mail: [email protected] ALL OTHER REGIONS Osprey Direct UK, P.O. Box 140, Wellingborough, Northants, NN8 2FA, UK E-mail: [email protected] www.ospreypublishing.com EDITOR'S NOTE All photographs, unless indicated otherwise, are courtesy of the U-Boot Archiv.
    [Show full text]
  • Military History of Italy During World War II from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia
    Military history of Italy during World War II From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia The participation of Italy in the Second World War was characterized by a complex framework of ideology, politics, and diplomacy, while its military actions were often heavily influenced by external factors. The imperial ambitions of the Fascist regime, which aspired to restore the Roman Empire in North Africa and the Mediterranean (the Mare Nostrum, or the Italian Empire), were partially met with the annexation of Albania and the Province of Ljubljana, and the occupation of British Somaliland and other territories, but ultimately collapsed after defeats in the East and North African campaigns. In July 1943, following the Allied invasion of Sicily, Italy and its colonies in May 1940 (Dodecanese islands Benito Mussolini was arrested by order of King and Tientsin concession in China are not shown) Victor Emmanuel III, provoking a civil war. Italy surrendered to the Allies at the end of the Italian Campaign. The northern half of the country was occupied by Germans with the fascists help and made a collaborationist puppet state (with more than 600,000 soldiers), while the south was governed by monarchist and liberal forces, which fought for the Allied cause as the Italian Co-Belligerent Army (at its height numbering more than 50,000 men), helped by circa 350,000[1] partisans of disparate political ideologies that operated all over Italy. Contents 1 Background 1.1 Imperial ambitions 1.2 Industrial strength 1.3 Economy 1.4 Military 2 Outbreak of the Second World
    [Show full text]
  • Sommergibili Italiani Operanti Nell'atlantico Dal 1940 Al 1043
    Sommergibili italiani operanti nell’Atlantico dal 1940 al 1043 La base operativa Betasom a Bordeaux Testi e foto ricavati da Wikipedia BETASOM era l'acronimo di Bordeaux Sommergibile (ottenuto dall'unione della prima lettera della parola «Bordeaux» -espressa con il nome della lettera dell'alfabeto greco equivalente dal punto di vista fonetico («beta»)- e la prima sillaba della parola «sommergibile»), la base navale dei sottomarini della Regia Marina a Bordeaux (costa atlantica meridionale francese) durante la seconda guerra mondiale. La base accolse una trentina di battelli della Regia Marina dall’autunno 1940 all’8 settembre 1943, data dell’entrata in vigore dell'armistizio di Cassibile. La base Il 25 luglio 1940, il ministero della Marina italiano ottenne l'autorizzazione allo schieramento di un certo numero di sottomarini in appoggio alla Germania nazista per la guerra nell'oceano Atlantico. Il luogo prescelto per la sede delle operazioni fu la città di Bordeaux, dove fu costruita una base navale a cui fu assegnato il nome in codice di BETASOM. Napoli 1938 - Sommergibili italiani schierati per la visita di Hitler in Italia, accompagnato da Mussolini La strategia sarebbe stata impostata insieme all'alleato tedesco, ma dal punto di vista tattico e disciplinare i vari battelli avrebbero operato sotto la responsabilità dei rispettivi comandi. Questo perché Hitler temeva che in caso di impiego dell'aviazione tedesca in Africa Settentrionale, una richiesta simile di comando unificato avrebbe portato gli aviatori germanici sotto il comando italiano. La base era costituita da due darsene intercomunicanti attraverso una chiusa. Inoltre, la presenza di bacini di carenaggio rendeva possibile la messa a secco degli scafi per le necessarie operazioni di revisione e riparazione.
    [Show full text]
  • Capital Philately Incorporating Pastcards and Machinations
    Volume 33 No. 1-3. December 2015 Capital Philately Incorporating Pastcards and Machinations. Published by The Philatelic Society of Canberra Inc. Inside this Issue: Mail in 19th Century Austrian-Occupied Poland The Little Brown Paper Packet Canals Floral Clocks 1954 – 62 QE II. 5c orange variety. Imperf block of 4. and more. Only the pair is catalogued in Yang. The Philatelic Society of Canberra Inc. (Founded 1932) GPO BOX 1840 CANBERRA ACT 2601 President Ian McMahon Secretary Tony Luckhurst Capital Philately Editorial Board Darryl Fuller Editor [email protected] Bruce Parker Pastcards Daniel Tangri Machinations Paul Barsdell Librarian Further information on the Philatelic Society of Canberra may be found on our web page: http://www.canberrastamps.org Capital Philately is published three times a year and supplied free to members of the Society. Enquiries regarding membership are welcome and should be addressed to Tony Luckhurst, Telephone (02) 6241 1963 Enquiries regarding subscription rates for Capital Philately, advertising rates, purchase of back issues etc. should be addressed to Darryl Fuller. He can be contacted by telephone on 0417 672 543 or by e-mail addressed to [email protected] Advertising rates are: full page $45, half page $25, quarter page $15. There is a 20% reduction on all rates for 4 consecutive issues. Articles, letters and other contributions to Capital Philately should be sent to the Editor; either by mail to the Society address, or C/- Darryl Fuller at the above e-mail. COPYRIGHT: The Philatelic Society of Canberra Inc holds the copyright of the contents of Capital Philately.
    [Show full text]
  • La Guerra Aeronavale Lungo Le Coste Dell'america Meridionale
    LA GUERRA AERONAVALE LUNGO LE COSTE DELL’AMERICA MERIDIONALE GABRIELE FAGGIONI Alla data del 1° settembre 1939 la Royal Navy e la Marine Nationale avevano un’enorme superiorità navale sulla Kriegsmarine, disponendo in totale di 504 unità contro le 104 della Marina tedesca. Tuttavia solo 158 navi da guerra erano dislocate nei porti del Regno Unito e in quelli francesi della Manica e del Golfo di Biscaglia. Per la difesa del traffico mercantile nelle acque dell’Atlantico centro- meridionale, la Marina britannica dislocava il Comando Atlantico Meridionale, comandato dal viceamm. George H. D’Ogly Lyon, con base a Freetown, e la la Divisione America Meridionale (South American Division) a Port Stanley (Falkland). Questa divisione comprendeva la 6a Squadra incrociatori (incrociatore leggero Neptune); la 9a Squadra incrociatori (Dauntless, Despatch, Danae e Durban); la nave appoggio idrovolanti Albatross; una sezione della 4a Divisione cacciatorpediniere (Hunter, Hyperion); gli sloop Auckland, Londonderry, Bridgewater e la 7a Flottiglia sommergibili (Clyde e Severn). La Divisione dell’America Meridionale era composta dagli incrociatori pesanti Cumberland ed Exeter, dall’incrociatore leggero Ajax, da una sezione dalla 4a Divisione cacciatorpediniere (Havock e Hotspur) e dai pescherecci armati Maple e Redwood.( 1 ) (1) http://www.naval-history.net/xDKWW2-3909-04RN.htm. Gabriele Faggioni - La guerra aeronavale lungo le coste dell'America meridionale La Marine Nationale dislocava all’inizio di settembre a Casablanca l’omonima divisione, comandata dal contramm. L.M.J. Sable, che aveva a disposizione i cacciatorpediniere Basque e Forbin e la 4a Divisione sommergibili (Argo, Henri Poincaré, Le Centaure e Pascal). Il 14 settembre 1939 venne istituito l’Ammiragliato Antille, che fu comandato dall’amm.
    [Show full text]
  • Nº 24 Novembro 2018
    Ano IX - Nº 24 Novembro 2018 Imagem desta Edição A imagem mostra dois submarinos alemães – U 156 e o U-507 (famoso por ter afundado diversos navios brasileiros na costa do Nordeste) – recolhendo os náufragos do RMS Lacônia em setembro de 1942. Essa operação de salvamento deu origem a um episódio que ficou conhecido como “Incidente Lacônia”. Pouco depois do naufrágio, a tripulação do U-156 ouviu vozes italianas no mar e seu comandante deu início as ope- rações de resgate e solicitou assistência por rádio, tanto de U-boats nas proximidades, quanto enviou mensagens não codificadas para todos os navios ao redor para ajudar, prometendo cessar as hostilidades. Nos dias que se seguiram, o U-156 resgatou cerca de 400 sobreviventes, 200 a bordo e os outros 200 em botes salva- -vidas. Em 15 de setembro, o U-506, o U-507 e o submarino italiano Cappellini se juntaram a operação de resgate. Os submarinos se dirigiram para a costa africana, rebocando os botes salva-vidas atrás deles e com centenas de sobrevi- ventes que estavam a bordo. Em 16 de setembro, um bombardeiro americano B-24 Liberator, operando a partir da Ilha de Ascensão, avistou os barcos que navegavam sob a bandeira da Cruz Vermelha indicando que se tratava de uma operação de salvamento. O piloto pediu instruções e recebeu ordens para atacar. Sob ataque, os submarinos soltaram as amarras dos botes salva-vidas e submergiram imediatamente, deixando centenas de pessoas lutando novamente na água, pois diversos náufragos que viajavam nos conveses. O ataque aéreo causou poucos danos e a maior parte dos náufragos abandonados acabaram socorridos por navios do Governo de Vichy; aproximadamente 1.500 sobreviveram.
    [Show full text]
  • The Unsustainable Legacy of the Nuclear Age 1
    The unsustainable legacy of the Nuclear Age 1 The enduring legacy of the Nuclear Age is incompatible with the terrestrial (and human) environment Angelo Baracca Retired Professor of Physics, Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Florence, Italy: [email protected] Keywords: Nuclear Age; Anthropocene; nuclear tests; radioactive contamination; health consequences; nuclear waste; spent nuclear fuel; plutonium; uranium mining. In the dispute on the beginning of the Anthropocene it has been proposed, among many, a precise date, July 16th 1945, when the Trinity Test exploded the first atomic bomb in the desert of Alamogordo2, which inaugurated the Nuclear Age. On the other hand, the almost contemporaneous Ecomodernist Manifesto proposed that, among other things, “nuclear fission today represents the only present-day zero-carbon technology with the demonstrated ability to meet most, if not all, of the energy demands of a modern economy.”3 I do not agree with either of these thesis. The Atomic Age has undoubtedly been a tremendous acceleration of the impact of human activities on natural environment, but in my opinion it joined, however it exacerbated, the trend embarked upon since the First Industrial Revolution, when Capitalism adopted radically new (scientific) methods to exploit and “commodise” Nature and its resources. This breakthrough kicked off the development of industrial processes carried out in physical and chemical conditions further and further away from the conditions of the natural environment on Earth surface,
    [Show full text]
  • I Sommergibili Italiani Dal Settembre 1943 Al Dicembre 1945
    I SOMMERGIBILI ITALIANI DAL SETTEMBRE 1943 AL DICEMBRE 1945 GIULIANO MANZARI I - Nell’estate del 1943, gli anglo-americani, con l’occupazione della Sicilia (operazione Husky),(1) avevano tagliato in due il teatro operativo marittimo italiano, separando il Tirreno dallo Ionio-Adriatico, senza possibilità di tra- vaso di unità dall’uno all’altro. La giornata del 3 settembre 1943 fu critica per l’Italia per tre motivi: 1°. All’alba del 3, dopo la consueta grande preparazione di fuoco aereo, terre- stre e navale, l’8a Armata britannica diede inizio all’operazione Baytown, fa- cendo attraversare al suo XIII Corpo d’Armata lo Stretto di Messina, sbar- cando due divisioni a cavallo a Reggio Calabria. 2°. Come conseguenza, il Comando in capo dei sommergibili, Maricosom (ammiraglio di squa- dra Antonio Legna- ni), mise in atto i pia- ni Zeta e Gamma, in- viando quattro som- mergibili fra Salerno e Policastro, sei fra la Sicilia e Crotone, tre CB sotto Crotone. Sommergibile italiano in navigazione. (1) Nel corso di tale campagna furono affondati otto sommergibili (Flutto, Nereide, Acciaio, Remo, Romolo, Ascianghi, Micca, Argento), il Bronzo fu catturato e l’Ambra e il Dandolo danneggiati. Bollettino d’Archivio dell’Ufficio Storico della Marina Militare – Dicembre 2011 3°. Nel pomeriggio, a Cassibile, nei pressi di Siracusa, il generale Giuseppe Ca- stellano, quale rappresentante del maresciallo d’Italia Pietro Badoglio, capo del Governo Militare italiano, firmò quello che per noi era un armistizio e, per gli anglo-americani, una resa senza condizioni. II - I piani Zeta e Gamma Fin dal 23 marzo 1943 Maricosom mise a punto un piano di schieramento in larga scala di sommergibili (detto Zeta) a protezione delle coste più vulnerabili dell’Italia meridionale, della Sardegna e della Sicilia.
    [Show full text]
  • Ter Herinnering Aan.. Pieter Willem ZEIJLEMAKER (28 Jaar)
    Re: Ter herinnering aan.. Pieter Willem ZEIJLEMAKER (28 jaar) Geboren 30 augustus 1913 op Terschelling Gehuwd met Alida Kuijper. Zoontje Willem Woonplaats Schiedam Pieter was 2e stuurman der Koopvaardij aan boord van de motor tanker 'Ocana' (1938) van de Petroleum Maatschappij 'La Corona' (Shell), die geladen met benzine, alleenvarend op weg was van Curaçao naar Halifax, onder kapitein J. Besier. Aan boord bevonden zich 57 bemanningsleden. De 'Ocana' wordt op 24 maart 1942 op de Atlantische Oceaan in de positie 42.36° N / 65.30° W door de Duitse onderzeeboot U 522 onder commando van Oberleutnant zur See Erich Topp getorpedeerd. Het lukt een aantal bemanningsleden om enkele sloepen in het water te krijgen. Verschillende bemanningsleden, waaronder Pieter, overlijden binnen anderhalf uur door het koude water. Van de 57 bemanningsleden komen er 53 om het leven. Vier overlevenden kunnen worden opgepikt door de Amerikaanse torpedojager USS Mayo (DD 422). Op 15 april wordt het nog drijvende wrak door de Canadese mijnenveger HMCS Burlington met geschutsvuur tot zinken gebracht. In april 1942 verschijnt in enkele dagbladen een bericht met het verlies van de 'Ocana'. Nieuws van de Dag, 18 april 1942 Pieter is begraven op het Church of England Cemetery te St. John's, New Foundland, Canada, Vak D, Rij 23, Graf 15. Foto: Oorlogsgravenstichting (2007) Ocana Dutch Motor tanker Name Ocana Type: Motor tanker Tonnage 6,256 tons Completed 1938 - Wilton-Fyenoord NV, Rotterdam Owner NV Petroleum Mij ´La Corona´, The Hague Homeport The Hague Date of attack 25 Mar 1942 Nationality: Dutch Fate Sunk by U-552 (Erich Topp) Position 42.36N, 65.30W - Grid CB 1363 Complement 57 (53 dead and 4 survivors).
    [Show full text]
  • Carlo Fecia Di Cossato
    CARLO FECIA DI COSSATO (ROMA, 25 SETTEMBRE 1908 - NAPOLI, 27 AGOSTO 1944) PRESTÒ SERVIZIO CON LA REGIA MARINA DURANTE LA SECONDA GUERRA MONDIALE E GLI VENNE CONFERITA LA MEDAGLIA D'ORO AL VALOR MILITARE. AFFONDÒ NELL’ATLANTICO 16 MERCANTILI IN 22 MESI AL COMANDO DEL SOMMERGIBILE ITALIANO ENRICO TAZZOLI, NELLA PAGINA A FIANCO IN NAVIGAZIONE DI GUERRA NELL’OCEANO: OPERAVA DALLA BASE OPERATIVA DI BORDEAUX, DEFINITA IN CODICE BETASOM. 80 M MAGGIO 2011 La piramide dell’esistenza: la dignità Il comandante Carlo Fecia di Cossato è stato molto più di un abile e coraggioso sommergibilista. È stato un uomo i cui valori di fedeltà e amor di Patria erano inderogabili e venivano prima di tutto. Anche della vita. Che decise di togliersi per ragioni che cerchiamo di comprendere in questa intervista. Immaginaria L’EROE DEL MARE PARLA DAL CIELO DI PIERO LAPORTA MAGGIO 2011 M 81 La piramide dell’esistenza: la dignità {LA NOSTRA EDUCAZIONE i osservo... Così risponde dopo una pausa mentre scruta me, merarle tutte le imprese dei miei antenati, esemplari per valore e lealtà. Lei avendogli appena chiesto: «Che cosa fa, ora?». La domanda, me può vantare qualcosa di analogo nei suoi ascendenti?». n’avvedo all’ultima sillaba, suona banale iniziando la conver- No, comandante, non ho nulla di simile. I miei antenati sono molto umi- sazione con un eroe, la cui risposta, proferita con una cert’a- li e il mio cespuglio genealogico è alquanto spoglio; non credo di poter an- ria di dubbio maligno, dovrebbe togliermi ogni coraggio a dare indietro più d’un paio di secoli.
    [Show full text]
  • La Strana Guerra Della Regia Marina
    1 LA STRANA GUERRA DELLA REGIA MARINA di Emilio Bonaiti Ci vogliono tre anni alla Marina per costruire una nave. Ce ne vogliono trecento per ricostruire una reputazione. Andrew Cunningham Gli uomini combattono, non le navi. Nelson La dottrina strategica - I capi - Le navi da battaglia - Le azioni navali - La guerra dei convogli - I sommergibili - I mezzi d’assalto - La cooperazione aeronavale – Malta - La portaerei - La fine. In questo lavoro si farà completa astrazione da luoghi comuni come sfortuna, valore, coraggio, ardimento, fede, abnegazione o eroismo, perché queste virtù furono appannaggio di tutti i marinai, i vivi e i morti, gli sconfitti e i vincitori che combatterono, con alterne fortune, i lunghi, sanguinosi anni della seconda Guerra Mondiale. Il lettore di storia che scrive, scorrendo la memorialistica e la storiografia postbelliche molto spesso assolutorie e strappalacrime, molto spesso con il celato obiettivo di nascondere crude verità, si è chiesto perché in questo amatissimo Paese non è stato iniziato e portato avanti un sia pure doloroso processo alle cause della vergognosa sconfitta patita nel 1943. Si è chiesto perché, con attenuazioni, negazioni e rimozioni si è fatta cadere soltanto sul capo del governo dell’epoca, massimo ma non unico colpevole, che Benedetto Croce avrebbe chiamato “una testa di turco”, tutta e per intera la responsabilità della più grande tragedia dell’Italia contemporanea. Cavagnari, Iachino, Riccardi, l’elenco sarebbe lungo, non furono chiamati a rispondere delle loro azioni in un paese nel quale il generale Ramorino nel 1849 fu il primo e unico generale condannato a morte e fucilato. Il peccato originario del Paese è stato di non avere fatto i conti con le cause e gli autori della sconfitta del 1943.
    [Show full text]