DOCSLIB.ORG

Hitch Ranch Specific Plan – Notice of Preparation of an Environmental

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Community Development Department (805) 517-6200 Planning www .moorparkca.gov 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, Ca 93021 NOTICE OF PREPARATION and NOTICE OF PUBLIC SCOPING MEETING Date: July 10, 2019 To: Reviewing Agencies, Interested Parties and Organizations From: City of Moorpark, Lead Agency Applicant: Comstock H om es Subject: Notice of Preparation and Scoping Meeting for an Environmental Impact Report for the Hitch Ranch Specific Plan The City of Moorpark is considering the Hitch Ranch Specific Plan, and has determined that an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) will be necessary to evaluate environmental impacts of the project, pursuant to the Ca lifo rnia Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). In compliance with CEQA, the City will be the Lead Agency and will prepare the EIR. Attached are the project description, loca ti on maps, and preliminary identifica ti on of the potential environmental issues to be analyzed in the EIR. The City is requesting comments and guidance on the scope and content of the EIR from responsible and trustee agencies, interested public agencies, organizations, and the general public (CEQA Guidelines 15082). [f your agency is a responsible agency as defined by Section 15381 of the CEQA Guidelines, your agency may use the environmental documents prepared by the City when considering permits or approvals for action regarding the project. Public Review Period: July 10, 2019 to August 8, 2019. The City requests review and consideration of this notice, and invites comments regarding the preparation of the EIR. Comments and responses to this notice must be in writing and submitted by the close of business on August 10, 2019, the last day of the comment period. Please provide a contact name, phone number and e:mail address with your comments. All comments must be sent to: Douglas Spondello, Planning Manager City of Moorpark 799 Moorpark Aven ue, Moorpark, CA 93021 (805) 517-6200 [ dspondello@moorparkca .gov Notice of Scoping Meeting: A scoping meeting to co llect oral comments on the scope of the EIR will be conducted by the Planning Commission on July 23, 2019 at 7:00 p.m. at City Hall, 799 Moorpark Avenue, e Council Chambers. If you have any questions, please contact me. Douglas Spondello, Planning Manager City of Moorpark Notice of Preparation for an Environmental Impact Report For the City of Moorpark Hitch Ranch Specific Plan Project Title Hitch Ranch Specific Plan – Specific Plan No 2019‐01, Residential Planned Development No. 2019‐01, Tentative Subdivision Map No. 2109‐01 for Tract No. 5708, Rezoning Permit No 2019‐01, and Development Agreement No. 2019‐01 Applicant Comstock Homes c/o Harriett Rapista, Senior Project Manager 2301 Rosecrans Avenue, Suite 1150 El Segundo, California 90245 hrapista@comstock‐homes.com / (424) 363‐9218 Project Location Regionally, the project site is located in southeastern Ventura County in the City of Moorpark, between the Simi Hills and Little Simi Valley. Locally, the project site is located in the rolling hills north of Poindexter Avenue, and west of Moorpark Avenue (State Route 23). Specifically, the site is approximately 270.64 acres, is located approximately 1,600 feet west of State Route 23, and extends to approximately 1,400 feet west of Gabbert Road. The regional location map (Figure 1, Regional Location) and site vicinity map (Figure 2, Local Vicinity Map) illustrate the project site in both a regional and local context. The project site is designated in the City of Moorpark General Plan Land Use Element as Specific Plan Area 1, with an Agriculture 1 overlay and has a zoning of Agricultural Exclusive (AE). The specific plan designation is provided to address large‐scale projects, and is intended to provide a planning tool for the systematic implementation of the general plan. The specific plan site comprises of the following parcels: Parcel 1: Assessor Parcel No: 511‐0‐020‐11 Parcel 5: Assessor Parcel No: 511‐0‐020‐18 Parcel 2: Assessor Parcel No: 511‐0‐020‐13 Parcel 6: Assessor Parcel No: 511‐0‐020‐19 Parcel 3: Assessor Parcel No: 511‐0‐020‐16 Parcel 7: Assessor Parcel No: 511‐0‐200‐22 Parcel 4: Assessor Parcel No: 511‐0‐020‐17 City of Moorpark 2 Hitch Ranch Specific Plan EIR June 2019 Notice of Preparation Project Description The proposed Hitch Ranch Specific Plan is designed as a mixed‐density residential community that incorporates land uses for housing, recreational and institutional purposes. The following discussion describes land uses proposed as part of the proposed specific plan, the relationship of individual land uses within the framework of the overall land plan, and infrastructure improvements necessary to support the development as proposed. Table 1, Specific Plan Statistical Summary, provides a summary of the proposed project in terms of the number of dwelling units, square footage of non‐residential uses, and facility improvements, and Figure 3, Specific Land Use Plan, illustrates the proposed land plan. City of Moorpark 3 Hitch Ranch Specific Plan EIR July 10, 2019 Notice of Preparation Table 1 Specific Plan Statistical Summary Dwelling Dwelling Area Land Use Acres Units/Acre Units (du) Planning Area 1 Single‐Family Dwelling Units 25.86 84 du Natural Open Space 19.69 Manufactured Slopes 19.41 1.29 gross Subtotal 64.96 Planning Area 2 Single‐Family Dwelling Units 34.08 177 du Natural Open Space 7.56 Manufactured Slopes 14.91 Recreation Lot 2.65 Passive Recreation Lot 1.32 2.92 gross Subtotal 60.52 Planning Area 3 Multi‐Family Dwelling Units 23.46 253 du Manufactured Slopes 5.40 Recreation Lot 4.1 7.68 gross Subtotal 32.96 Planning Area 4 Multi‐Family Dwelling Units 10.87 241 du Manufactured Slopes 5.40 14.81 gross Subtotal 16.27 Planning Area 5 Open Space 3.37 Planning Area 6 Open Space 29.10 Public Facilities Park (adjacent to Civic Center) 6.00 North Hills Parkway 11.97 “A” Street 4.36 Meridian Hills Drive 3.03 Casey Road 1.37 High Street 6.64 Gabbert Road 2.86 VCWPD Easement 2.70 Detention Basin 1 12.27 Detention Basin 2 5.96 Detention Basin 3 6.30 Subtotal 63.46 Totals 270.64 2.79 gross 755 du City of Moorpark 4 Hitch Ranch Specific Plan EIR July 10, 2019 Notice of Preparation LAKE-OF THE-WOODS Kern County Kern County FRAZIER Los Angeles County Ventura County PARK 5 LOCKWOOD VALLEY 33 LOS ANGELES PADRES NATIONAL Pyramid Reservoir NATIONAL County a County a FOREST V entura County arbar B FOREST entur V anta S Sespe Los 5 Condor Angeles Sanctuary WHEELER SPRINGS County Lake Piru OJAI MIRA MONTE SUMMIT BUCKHORN FILLMORE 126 PIRU OAKVIEW 150 150 LA CONCHITA CASITAS SPRINGS BARDSDALE Lake Casitas 101 SEA CLIFF FOSTER PARK 23 SANTA PAULA 33 PRPROJECTOJECT LOCATIONLOCATION MOORPARK VENTURA SATICOY 118 126 SOMIS SIMI VALLEY SANTA 118 MOORPARK SUSANA 101 232 ACRES MONTALVO 34 NYELAND ACRES 23 P a 1 c i CAMARILLO NEWBURY f i PARK c 34 THOUSAND OAKS OXNARD O HOLLYWOOD–BYc THE–SEA VENTU PARK HOLLYWOODe BEACH 101 LAKE SHERWOOD 23 SILVER STRAND PORT a HUENEME n County POINT MUGU VenturaAngeles County 5.0 2.5 0 5.0 Los 1 n APPROXIMATE SCALE IN MILES SOURCE: Impact Sciences, Inc. – October 2006 FIGURE 1 Regional Location 1318.001•03/19 GRIMES CYN RD . BROADWAY 23 . D R N O Y N A WALNUT C 118 GAB BER T R D. PROJECT CASEY RD. ELES AV ANG E . SITE OS . L HIGH ST. W POINDEXTER AVE. MOORP ARK A VE. LOS ANGELES AVE, 118 23 Arro yo SP Sim RI i NG R D. R. D D OO RYW COUNT . IL ST TRA AIN NT M O U WA TIERRA REJADA RD. M EADOW D LNU R. T CR E . E D K R Legend: 2640 1320 0 2640 City of Moorpark n APPROXIMATE SCALE IN FEET SOURCE: Impact Sciences, Inc. – September 2011 FIGURE 2 Project Vicinity 1318.001•03/19 SSppeecciiffiiccSp PPlelacanifnic SStPltaaatntiisSstttiaictcaisaltilc SSualumSmmummamararyryy A Planning Area 1 B LAND USE C ACRDES DU/AEC DUF % DRIVE 1 Planning Area 1 LANDSingle USEFamily DwellingACRESUnits 2DU/AC3.82 3.1DU5 75% 41 HILLS 2 Single Family DwellingNatural O Unitspen Space25.86 18.39 84 40 31 MERIDIAN 3 Natural OpenManu Spacefactured Slope19.69s 16.62 30 28 Open Space 4 Manufactured SlopesTOTAL 19.41 58.83 1.27 7530 100 5 TOTAL 64.96 1.29 84 100 6 Planning Area 2 Single Family Dwelling Units 34.2 5.17 177 56 PA-1 7 Planning Area 2 Single Family DwellingNatural O Unitspen Space34.08 14.96 177 56 24 8 Natural OpenManu Spacefactured Slope7.56s 8.75 13 14 9 ManufacturedRe Slopescreation Lot 14.91 2.33 25 4 10 RecreationPa Lotssive Rec Lot 2.65 1.36 4 2 11 Passive Rec LotTOTAL 1.32 61.6 2.87 1772 100 SSppeecciiffiiccSp PPlelacanifnic SStPltaaatntiisSstttiaictcaisaltilc SSualumSmm12ummamararyryy TOTAL 60.52 2.92 177 100 13 Planning Area 3 Multi Family Dwelling Units 23.46 10.78 253 72 14 Planning Area 3 Multi FamilyM Dwellinganufact Unitsured Slope23.46s 5.2 253 71 15 A Planning Area 1 B LAND USE CDEFACRES 15DU/AC DU %ManufacturedRe Slopescreation Lot 5.4 4.1 16 13 DRIVE 1 Planning Area 1 LANDSingle USEFamily DwellingACRESUnits 2 DU/AC3.82 163.1 DU5 75 % 41 Recreation LotTOTAL 4.1 32.76 7.72 25133 100 HILLS 2 SingleFamilyDwellingUnitsNatural Open Space 25.86 18.39 17 84 40 31 TOTAL 32.96 7.68 253 100 MERIDIAN PA-3 3 NaturalOpenSpaceManufactured Slope 19.69s 16.62 18 P30lanning Ar2e8a 4 Multi Family Dwelling Units 17.71 22.64 401 76 Open Space 4 ManufacturedSlopesTOTAL 19.41 58.83 191.2Planning7 Area7530 4 Multi100 FamilyM Dwellinganufact Unitsured Slope10.87s 5.75 241 67 24 PA-1 5 TOTAL 64.96 1.29 20 84 100 Manufactured SlopesTOTAL 5.4 23.46 17.09 40331 100 6 Planning Area 2 Single Family Dwelling Units 34.2 215.17 177 56 TOTAL 16.27 14.81 241 100 PA-1 7 PlanningArea2 SingleFamilyDwellingUnitsNatural Open Space 34.08 14.96 22 177P 56lanning Ar2e4a 5
Recommended publications
  • Preliminary Report Aviation

    Preliminary Report Aviation

    This space for binding NTSB ID: WPR14FA203 Most Critical Injury: National Transportation Safety Board Fatal PRELIMINARY REPORT Occurrence Date: 05/23/2014 Investigated By: NTSB AVIATION Occurrence Type: Accident Location/Time Nearest City/Place State Zip Code Local Time Time Zone Santa Paula CA 93060 1030 PDT Aircraft Information Registration Number Aircraft Manufacturer Model/Series Number N4081H ROBINSON HELICOPTER R22 BETA Type of Aircraft: Helicopter Amateur Built Aircraft? No Injury Summary: Fatal 1 Serious Minor None Revenue Sightseeing Flight: No Air Medical Transport Flight: No Narrative Brief narrative statement of facts, conditions and circumstances pertinent to the accident/incident: *** Note: NTSB investigators either traveled in support of this investigation or conducted a significant amount of investigative work without any travel, and used data obtained from various sources to prepare this aircraft accident report. *** On May 23, 2014, about 1030 Pacific daylight time, a Robinson R22 helicopter, N4081H, collided with overhead distribution power lines and terrain while maneuvering west of the Santa Paula Airport (SZP) Santa Paula, California. The certified commercial pilot, the sole occupant of the helicopter, was fatally injured. The helicopter was substantially damaged. The helicopter was registered to Sierra Flite, LLC, Camden, Delaware, and operated by Channel Islands Helicopters, LLC, Oxnard, California, under the provisions of 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91, as a personal flight. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed for the flight, and no flight plan was filed. The flight originated from Oxnard Airport (OXR) Oxnard, California about 0930. According to Channel Islands Helicopters, the pilot departed OXR after refueling, and flew in the area near the Camarillo Airport, Camarillo, California (CMA), where he then departed for SZP.
  • Appendix F - Aircraft Impact Analysis

    Appendix F - Aircraft Impact Analysis

    APPENDIX F - AIRCRAFT IMPACT ANALYSIS Camarillo Hotel and Conference Center Draft Environmental Impact Report F ACTA Inc Report No. 17-1014-1 AIRCRAFT IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR CAMARILLO HOTEL AND CONFERENCE CENTER Prepared for: City of Camarillo 601 Carmen Drive Camarillo, CA 93012 Prepared by: ACTA Inc 2730 Skypark Drive Torrance, CA 90505 June 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................... 1 2. SITE LOCATION .............................................................................................................. 2 3. CAMARILLO AIRPORT OPERATIONS ........................................................................... 4 3.1 Number of Annual Operations by Aircraft Type ............................................... 4 3.2 Camarillo Airport Flight Tracks ........................................................................ 7 4. CAMARILLO AIRPORT ACCIDENT HISTORY ............................................................. 11 5. AIRCRAFT ACCIDENT RATES ..................................................................................... 18 6. DISTRIBUTION OF ACCIDENTS ................................................................................... 19 6.1 Probability of Impact Given an Accident Occurs ........................................... 19 7. PROPERTY IMPACT PROBABILITIES ......................................................................... 25 7.1 Property Impact Probabilities .......................................................................
  • January/February 2018 November/December 2017 Volume 123

    January/February 2018 November/December 2017 Volume 123

    INSIDE THIS ISSUE President’s Perspective Half Moon Bay Airport 7 DART Training Event Gnoss Field Airport 3 SMO Runway Shortening Resumes 8 California Airport and Pilot 12 Santa Monica Airport Tower Plays Political Action Committee 'Critical' Role in Fire Fighting Efforts, Aviation Group Says Signature Flight Support 4 Santa Paula Airport critical to 9 CalPilots Business Partners 13- Santa Barbara fighting Thomas Fire. 14 Happenings Around the 5 KSBD installs new self-serve fuel 10 Board Contacts 15 Northern Portion of California terminal Small airport can make a big im- Upcoming Events 16 pact for Earthquake & Disaster Support Preparedness San Carlos Airport Gnoss Field January/February 2018 November/December 2017 Volume 123 The official publication of the California Pilots Association www.CalPilots.org PRESIDENT’S PERSPECTIVE A Year in Reflection Another year has come to pass. As I sit pondering all of that has happened this past year, I wonder what the new year will bring. We have seen many changes and have had the oppor- tunity to meet and work with many wonderful people. Jolie Lucas, George Riddle, and Paul Marshall were recently elected in October to fill open positions on the CalPilots Board. Each brings knowledge, passion, and a wonderful attitude to the group. This year we have seen growth in CalPilots with the new chapters forming at Reid Hillview Airport (CAAPSO) and Oakdale Municipal Airport. Not sure how to become a CalPilots Chapter? Ask us! We would be glad to help you through the process. This past year has seen some challenges to our airports. We have an ongoing lawsuit in Bermuda Dunes concern- ing airport land use.
  • WPR11FA304 N6451X 07/03/2011 Fatal Accident NTSB Santa Paula

    WPR11FA304 N6451X 07/03/2011 Fatal Accident NTSB Santa Paula

    This space for binding WPR11FA304 N6451X National Transportation Safety Board NTSB ID: Aircraft Registration Number: FACTUAL REPORT Occurrence Date: 07/03/2011 Most Critical Injury: Fatal AVIATION Occurrence Type: Accident Investigated By: NTSB Location/Time Nearest City/Place State Zip Code Local Time Time Zone Santa Paula CA 93060 2021 PDT Airport Proximity: Off Airport/Airstrip Distance From Landing Facility: 2 Aircraft Information Summary Aircraft Manufacturer Model/Series Type of Aircraft CESSNA 180D Airplane Revenue Sightseeing Flight: No Air Medical Transport Flight: No Narrative Brief narrative statement of facts, conditions and circumstances pertinent to the accident/incident: *** Note: NTSB investigators either traveled in support of this investigation or conducted a significant amount of investigative work without any travel, and used data obtained from various sources to prepare this aircraft accident report. *** HISTORY OF FLIGHT On July 3, 2011, about 2021 Pacific daylight time, a Cessna 180D, N6451X, was substantially damaged when it struck a telephone line that spanned across the Santa Clara River, about 1.8 miles south- southwest of the Santa Paula Airport (SZP), Santa Paula, California. The commercial pilot and his passenger were fatally injured. The airplane was registered to a private individual and operated by the pilot under the provisions of Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91. Dusk visual meteorological conditions prevailed and no flight plan was filed. The flight originated from SZP about 2000. A witness, who was a rated pilot, reported to the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) investigator-in-charge (IIC) that he was located at SZP, and observed the airplane during a portion of the accident flight.
  • National Transportation Safety Board I

    National Transportation Safety Board I

    AN S R P T O L R A T LUR IBUS N P UNUM A E O T National Transportation Safety Board I I O T A N Washington, D.C. 20594 N S A D FE R T Y B OA Aircraft Accident Investigative Update On January 26, 2020, at 0945 Pacific standard time (PST), a Sikorsky SK76B helicopter, N72EX, collided with hilly terrain near the city of Calabasas, California. The pilot and eight passengers were fatally injured, and the helicopter was destroyed by impact forces and fire. The helicopter was operated by Island Express Helicopters Inc. under Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 135 as an on-demand passenger visual flight rules (VFR) flight from John Wayne-Orange County Airport, (KSNA), Santa Ana, California, to Camarillo Airport, (KCMA), Camarillo, California. The NTSB launched a go-team consisting of an investigator-in-charge from the Major Investigations division and specialists in operations, human performance, airworthiness, powerplants, aerial imagery, air traffic control (ATC), meteorology, maintenance records, and site control. Parties to the investigation include the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Island Express Helicopters, Sikorsky, and the National Air Traffic Controllers Association. The Transportation Safety Board of Canada is participating in the investigation as an accredited representative, as is Pratt and Whitney Canada as a technical advisor. The investigative team was also assisted on scene by numerous other federal, state and local law enforcement and public safety agencies. The wreckage was located in the foothills of the Santa Monica mountains, in a mountain bike park. The impact site was on an approximate 34⁰ slope.
  • Vc99s Host Jessica Cox at Camarillo Air Show

    Vc99s Host Jessica Cox at Camarillo Air Show

    Chairman: Karen Johnson Vice Chairman: Carolyn Brown Secretary: Linda Ehrich Treasurer: Sheila Collier Past Chairman: Lori Parker Newsletter: Pat McCollum www.VC99s.com September 2012 Newsletter of the Ventura County Chapter of the Ninety-Nines, Inc. If you’re reading a paper copy of our newsletter, it is printed from an electronic file that can be found —in color— at www.vc99s.org Register to get current notices of The Flyer via email at this site VC99s Host Jessica Cox N E X T M E E T I N G at Camarillo Air Show T U E S D AY, S E P T E M B E R 1 8 by Susan Liebeler The Ventura County 99s hosted acclaimed Flying Beyond the PTS motivational speaker and pilot Jessica Cox at the Wings The VC99s will host speaker, Mark King CFI, at Over Camarillo Air Show, on August 18 and August 19. this month's General Business meeting on Tuesday, Born without arms, she lives an otherwise normal life, September 18 at the CAVU Coffee Shop, KSZP. Join us using her feet as for dinner at 5:30 pm; meeting to begin by 6:30, and others use their the presentation, “Practically Speaking”, will start no hands to accomplish later than 7:15 pm. her daily tasks as Guests and 49-1/2s are welcome to sit in on this well as drive her car session, moderated by Yolanda Langley, as we bridge and fly her airplane. the gap between “technical” PTS flying and “practical” Jessica is the first flying techniques.
  • Southern California Fact Sheet

    Southern California Fact Sheet

    FAA Facts Federal Aviation Administration, Washington, D.C. 20591 Southern California Metroplex The Federal Aviation Administration’s Next Generation Air Transportation System, or NextGen, is the on-going transformation of air traffic control technologies and procedures in the United States. You might think of this transition as similar to moving from paper maps to GPS when you drive your car. In addition to improving navigation, NextGen brings other benefits: • NextGen enhances aviation safety, reduces workload on the flight crew and air traffic controllers, provides repeatable predictable flight paths and modernizes air traffic procedures to today’s standards. o A key NextGen goal is to safely improve the way aircraft navigate complex, metropolitan areas, which we call Metroplexes, to make flight routes and airports more safe and efficient. • The FAA has identified multiple Metroplex areas in the United States. Each Metroplex includes one or more commercial airports that serve at least one major city: o A Metroplex allows the FAA to improve regional traffic movement by making the best use of airspace and procedures, using precise, satellite-based navigation. • Use of NextGen procedures in these areas could improve on-time performance, which would benefit the region and the entire National Airspace System. SoCal Metroplex The airspace surrounding the Southern California area has a large number of air traffic procedures which have not been changed for many years. • While these procedures are safe, most are inefficient due to advances in technology. • This is one of the reasons why the airspace surrounding the Southern California airports have been identified for Metroplex development. • The proposed Metroplex would allow for more direct and efficient routing of aircraft into and out of Southern California and its surrounding airports, enhancing aviation safety, and reducing flight delays above these communities.
  • Investigation Report

    Investigation Report

    ~ " ...l . ' ~ CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY AND FIRE PROTECTION SAN LUIS OBISPO UNIT 635 North Santa Rosa Street San Luis Obispo, CA 93405 VENTURA COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT 165 Durley Avenue Camarillo, CA 93010 INVESTIGATION REPORT CASE NUMBER: 17CAVNC103156 CASE NAME: THOMAS DATE: December 4, 2017 INCIDENT TYPE: Wildland Fire INCIDENT INVESTIGATORS: Christine SAQUI, Fire Investigator - VCFD Aimin ALTON, Firefighter (PM) - VCFD Alex LOMVARDIAS, Special Agent - USFS Dennis BYRNES, Fire Captain - CAL FIRE Brian KINSLEY, Firefighter - VCFD Gregg DELAROSA, Senior Deputy - VCSO Jay SNODGRASS, Fire Captain Investigator - SBCOFD Jace CHAPIN, Battalion Chief - CAL FIRE Jon BERGH, Fire Investigator - VCFD Ryan MILLER, Firefighter - VCFD Ken RUSSELL, Fire Captain-Specialist - CAL FIRE Steven DEAN, Fire Investigator - USFS Marshall HATCH, Fire Investigator - VCFD Tom CRASS, Fire Captain-Specialist - CAL FIRE Shannan HARRIS, Fire Captain-Specialist - CAL FIRE Patrick KELLEY, Fire Captain - VCFD THOMAS December 4 2017 17CAVNC103156 1 1-VIOLATIONS: 2 3 Penal Code§ 192 4 Manslaughter is the unlawful killing of a human being without malice. It is of 5 three kinds: 6 (b) Involuntary-in the commission of an unlawful act, not amounting to a felony; 7 or in the commission of a lawful act which might produce death, in an unlawful 8 manner, or without due caution and circumspection. This subdivision shall not 9 apply to acts committed in the driving of a vehicle. 10 11 Penal Code § 452 12 A person is guilty of unlawfully causing a fire when he recklessly sets fire to or 13 burns or causes to be burned, any structure, forest land or property. 14 (a) Unlawfully causing a fire that causes great bodily injury is a felony punishable 15 by imprisonment in the state prison for two, four or six years, or by imprisonment 16 in the county jail for not more than one year, or by a fine, or by both such 17 imprisonment and fine.
  • Hangar Facility

    Hangar Facility

    OFFERING MEMORANDUM HANGAR FACILITY SUBJECT PROPERTY PHOTO A DUAL-HANGAR FACILITY SITUATED ON ± 4.48 ACRES WITHIN CAMARILLO AIRPORT 575 AVIATION DRIVE | CAMARILLO, CA 93010 HANGAR FACILITY CONTACT US KATRIN GIST National Lead, CBRE Airport Properties CA Lic. 01928732 +1 206 947 1399 [email protected] MIKE PHILBIN Vice President CA Lic. 01922822 +1 818 907 4691 [email protected] SAM ALISON Senior Vice President CA Lic. 01167124 +1 818 907 4690 [email protected] SUBJECT PROPERTY PHOTO SUBJECT PROPERTY PHOTO THE OFFERING $14,500,000 CBRE is pleased to offer this extraordinary opportunity to OFFERING PRICE purchase the Air 7 FBO hangar facility at the Camarillo Airport. This ±65,258 SF premier facility has two 27,043 SF hangar bays and 11,172 SF of high-end office space with lobby and lounge areas, private offices, conference rooms, pilot sleeping AIR 7 HANGAR FACILITY quarters, and kitchen facilities. The facility has its own fuel ±65,258 SF farm with 12,000 and 20,000 gallon above-ground fuel tanks, and is an incredible opportunity for a variety of aviation venues, including FBOs, MROs, private flight departments, 575 AVIATION DRIVE and/or charter operators. The Los Angeles area hangar market is exceptionally tight, and it is rare to find a hangar facility of CAMARILLO, CA 93010 this size and quality available to purchase. 3 HANGAR FACILITY HIGHLIGHTS SUBJECT PROPERTY PHOTO FACILITY IS SITUATED ON ±195,184 SF (±4.48 ACRES) TWO 27,043 SF HANGAR BAYS WITH 27 FT. 10 IN. TALL TWO-WAY SLIDING HANGAR DOORS THAT OPEN TO A 131 FT.
  • Ventura County Airport Master Plan Response to Questions and Comments

    Ventura County Airport Master Plan Response to Questions and Comments

    VENTURA COUNTY AIRPORT MASTER PLAN RESPONSE TO QUESTIONS AND COMMENTS Current as of May 28, 2021 The Ventura County Department of Airports would like to thank community members who participated in the public workshop that was recently conducted to kick off the Camarillo and Oxnard Airport Master Plan update. Based on the feedback received to date, the Department has decided to pause the Master Plan process for a period of approximately one year or more if needed to broaden community engagement. For more information, please visit the project website, which is listed below. This is a summary and response to questions/comments submitted to the airport consulting team, Coffman Associates, Inc., who is preparing the Airport Master Plan study for Ventura County, California owned and operated airports (Camarillo Airport and Oxnard Airport). Comments/questions have been received from the following sources: The project website: https://venturacounty.airportstudy.net/ The first of four public information workshops held via Zoom on May 13, 2021 at 2:00 p.m. Direct emails to the consultant team Questions and comments are grouped by topic with responses provided where appropriate. Questions Regarding Noise 1. May 13 Zoom at 16:14:18 From Bob Merrilees to Everyone: Are aircraft landing and departing CMA required to comply with Stage 3 or Stage 5 Noise standards? 2. May 13 Zoom at 16:15:08 From David Cronshaw to Everyone: Will there be placed noise meters at OXR and CMA? Residents have huge concerns with excessive flight training touch and goes over Oxnard neighborhoods. 3. May 13 Zoom at 16:34:31 From EE to Everyone: Oxnard airport noise has increased! what is this doing to our property values and our quality of life? 4.

  • Addendum Number 2

    City of Santa Paula Airpark Specific Plan Addendum #2 to the Mitigated Negative Declaration Prepared by: City of Santa Paula 970 Ventura Street Santa Paula, California 93060 October 2017 2 of 46 City of Santa Paula Airpark Specific Plan Addendum #2 to the Mitigated Negative Declaration Addendum #2 to the Mitigated Negative Declaration Table of Contents Airpark Specific Plan ...................................................................................................................... 3 Table of Figures .................................................................................................................................. 6 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................... 7 PROJECT DESCRIPTION/BACKGROUND ................................................................................... 8 Project Site Location ......................................................................................................................... 8 Airpark Specific Plan and MND .................................................................................................. 17 Current (2017) Proposal ............................................................................................................... 18 AIRPARK SPECIFIC PLAN CEQA PROCESS/MND .................................................................. 19 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS OF THE PROPOSED ............................................................... 20 AIRPARK SPECIFIC PLAN

  • Things Aviation

    February 2015 Update- All things Aviation: 1 If you’d like additional information, please contact Newport Beach City Manager Dave Kiff at [email protected] . JWA Appoints New Acting Airport Director The Orange County Board of Supervisors on February 3, appointed Lawrence G. Serafini as Acting Airport Director of John Wayne Airport. The appointment was made as a result of the retirement of current Airport Director Alan L. Murphy. Mr. Serafini began his career with John Wayne Airport as Deputy Airport Director, Facilities in August 2001. In this position, he has been responsible for managing Airport Development, Engineering, Maintenance, Information Systems, Planning and Environmental Compliance. Mr. Serafini holds a Master of Science in Civil Engineering from California State University, Long Beach and a Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute. He is a registered California Professional Engineer in Civil Engineering. Mr. Serafini retired from the U.S. Navy as a Lieutenant Commander, Civil Engineer Corps. Mr. Murphy retired from the County of Orange on February 5 and Mr. Serafini became Acting Airport Director on February 6, 2015. JWA- January While the full numbers have not been released, the passenger numbers for January 2015, show an approximate increase of +2.5% for the first month of the New Year versus January 2014. 1 The picture was a recent winner of the JWA Photo Contest Carrier Share at JWA 2 Southwest 3,673 41.38% United 1,309 14.74% American 1,198 13.49% Alaska 815 9.18% Delta 761 8.57% Other 1,121 12.63% Southwest Expands Service at JWA Southwest Airlines recently announced it is expanding service from JWA.