Faculty of Education Q Jennifer Lamarche-Schmalz 1997

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Faculty of Education Q Jennifer Lamarche-Schmalz 1997 THE ONTARIO COLLEGE OF TEACHERS: SELF-REGULATION OR CONTROL OF TEACHING? Jennifer Lamarche-Schmalz Faculty of Education Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Education Faculty of Graduate Studies The University of Western Ontario London, Ontario August 1997 Q Jennifer Lamarche-Schmalz 1997 National Library Bibliothèque nationale ($1 of Canada du Canada Acquisitions and Acquisitions et Bibliographic Services services bibliographiques 395 Wellington Street 395, nie Wellington Ottawa ON KIA ON4 Ottawa ON K 1A ON4 Canada Canada Your hie Vorro reterence Our ri& Notre retdrence The author has granted a non- L'auteur a accordé une licence non exclusive licence allowing the exclusive permettant à la National Library of Canada to Bibliothèque nationale du Canada de reproduce, loan, distribute or sel1 reproduire, prêter, distribuer ou copies of ths thesis in rnicrofonn, vendre des copies de cette thèse sous paper or electronic formats. la forme de microfiche/filrn, de reproduction sur papier ou sur format électronique. The author retains ownership of the L'auteur conserve la propriété du copyright in this thesis. Neither the droit d'auteur qui protège cette thèse. thesis nor substantial extracts fiom it Ni la thèse ni des extraits substantiels may be printed or otherwise de celle-ci ne doivent être imprimés reproduced without the author's ou autrement reproduits sans son permission. autorisation. Abstract This study analyzes the creation of an Ontario College of Teachers to determine whether a College will. in the opinion of teachers. further the self- regulation of the teachers of Ontario or serve as a mechanism to increase state control of the teaching profession. This study focuses first on the historical context of the College of Teachers initiative. It then reviews the literature pertinent to the concepts of self- regdation, professionalism, power and control. Chapter three analyzes the available government and teachers' federations and associations documentation relating to the creation of an Ontario College of Teachers. Interviews conducted with the presidents of the Ontario Teachers' Federation (OTF). Association des enseignantes et des enseignants franco-ontariens (AEFO), Ontario English Catholic Teachers' Association (OECTA), Ontario Public School Teachers' Federation (OPSTF) and Ontario Secondary School Teachers' Federation (OSSTF) are discussed with reference to the frarnework laid out in the literature review. The OTF and its affiliates were found to be very suspicious of the government's motives, particulariy when discussing the composition of the Governing Council of the College. The researcher discovered nothing that would suggest that teachers' suspicions were ill-founded. III Acknowledgements I would like to thank Dr. Rebecca Priegert Coulter for her guidance, support. and mostly her understanding throughout this process. Her vision and integrity made this study an enjoyable learning expertence. I would also like to thank Dr. Marshall Mangan for his invaluable insight and his many contributions to the finished product. I am most grateful to my husband, John Schrnalz. for always being supportive and understanding of my many endeavours. He has never hesitated to encourage me to pursue al1 of my goals and dreams. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Certificate of examination II Abstract ii i Dedication iv Acknowledgements v Table of contents vi List of Appendices Chapter 1 - Introduction and Historical Context Chapter 2 - Professionaiism. Power and Control Chapter 3 - lmplementing the College: A Chronology Chapter 4 - Federation and Association Perspectives Chapter 5 - Conclusions and Final Thoughts Appendices References Vita LIST OF APPENDICES Appendix Page Appendix A Interview Questions 68 Appendtx B Ethical Review Clearance Certificate 69 Chapter 1 - Introduction and Historical Context In February 1995. the Ontario Royal Commission on Learning released its final report. lncluded in its many recommendations was one clearly specifying the need to create a "professional self-regulatory body for teaching" (vol.l Il. 1994. p.61) or. as the Commission called it, the Ontario College of Teachers. The purpose of this study is to analyze whether the creation of an Ontario College of Teachers will, in the opinion of teachers. further the self-regulation of the teaching profession. or whether it will serve as a mechanism to further state control of the teaching profession. The concept of a College of Teachers is not new in Canada. The Royal Commission report entitled Livina and Learninq (Ontario, 1968), better known as the Hall-Dennis report. contained a very specific recomrnendation dealing with the issue of teacher self-governance. Recommendation 137 of the report called on the Ontario government to "Enact a Teaching Profession Act which will make teaching a self governing profession with powers to license and to discipline its members, these powers to be exercised through an organization to be known as the College of Teachers of Ontario" (Ontario. 1968. p. 192). This proposal did not become a reality in the late sixties. but the Hall-Dennis recommendation opened the door for both the government and the Ontario Teachers' Federation (OTF) and its five affiliates: the Federation of Women Teachers' Associations of Ontario (FWTAO). the Ontario English Cat holic Teachers' Association (OECTA). the Ontario Public School Teachers' Federation (OPSTF), the Ontario Secondary School Teachers' Federation (OSSTF) and the Association des enseignantes et des enseignants franco- ontariens (AEFO), to begin considering and discussing the advantages and disadvantages of teacher self-regulation. An OTF Commission established to consider the notion of a College "responded favourably to the concept of increasing the professional status of teachers" (Francis. 1993. p.45). This is reflected in the OTF Commission's report. Pattern for Professionalism, which O bserved: If we are to be professionals in the full sense, we must be responsible for the standards of our profession. This means finding avenues of influence and channels of communication, which. we must admit, however reluctantly. do not presently exist in as effective a fon as we should like to see them. (OTF. 1968, P. 10) However. by the mid-seventies. the issue of teacher self-governance had al1 but been forgotten. The debate did not resurface until 1980 when the then Minister of Education. Dr. Bette Stephenson, and her Deputy Minister. Dr. Harry Fisher, revisited the idea of creating an Ontario College of Teachers. Stephenson formally introduced her vision of a College of Teachers in a document entitled Issues and Directions (Ontario, Ministry of Education [hereafter MOE], 1980). In this report, Stephenson clearly stated her intentions in the following sections: 4.3 The Government believes that the teaching profession has reached a stage of maturity comparable to that of other established professions and that the public interest can therefore be safeguarded through means other than those now in effect. 4.3.1 It is proposed that the Ministry of Education enter into discussions with the Ontario Teachers' Federation to plan the creation of a professional association or "college of teachers", which will exercise. on behalf of the public interest, rights of admission, certification. discipline, professional development, and maintenance of the professional records of teachers. 4.3.2 The Ministry of Education proposes to conduct a formal review of the Teaching Profession Act, 7944, with particular reference to the changes that should be made subsequent to the creation of a "college of teachers". (Ontario. MOE, 1980,p.40) Stephenson went beyond simply making the announcement and waiting for the outcorne. In fact " Issues and Directions also proposed . to pursue it [a College of Teachers] more aggressively" (Francis. 1993. p.49). By 1983. Stephenson had a specific implementation strategy which was set out in Education Ontario (Ontario, MO€. June 1983). This article prescribed the following structure for a College: i) The College of Teachers would be a separate entity from the existing Ontario Teachers' Federation and the professional organizations. ii) Membership in the College would be mandatory for ali who hold positions with a school board or in the Ministry of Education by virtue of a basic licence to teach in Ontario. but voluntary for teachers in the private sector (mandatory membership would not extend to teachers in pst secondary or adult continuing education). iii) Mernbership in OTF would not be a pre-requisite for membership in the College. iv) There would be a single College to represent al1 teachers - public and separate, as well as French and English. v) The Minister of Education and the Ministry of Colleges and Universities would be an ex-officio member of the governing body of the College of Teachers. Governance Structure i) The Council would be a separate legal entity from the existing Teachers' Federation and other professional organizations. ii) The Minister of Education and the Ministry of Colleges and Universities would be an ex-officio member of the Council. iii) The College would be self-financing and would have the authority to levy fees from rnembership to cover its costs of operation. iv) There would be 26 mernbers of the Governing Council as follows: 6 appointments by the lieutenant governor-in-council. 2 representatives elected by professional staff of Faculties of Education. and 18 teachers elected directly by teachers on a geographic basis
Recommended publications
  • I STATE of the ARTS: FACTORS INFLUENCING ONTARIO
    STATE OF THE ARTS: FACTORS INFLUENCING ONTARIO ELEMENTARY TEACHERS’ PERFORMING ARTS INSTRUCTION By Paul R. Vernon A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Education in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Master of Education Queen’s University Kingston, Ontario, Canada December 2014 Copyright © Paul R. Vernon, 2014 i Abstract This thesis examines Ontario elementary teachers perceptions of their teaching of the performing arts (i.e., music, drama, and dance), through responses to an online survey. Participants (N = 138) described multiple aspects of their training and experiences in the performing arts, their comfort in teaching the performing arts, and the degree to which they thought they were teaching the expectations in the curriculum document. The document “The Arts, Grades 1-8, 2009” clearly describes (a) many benefits of performing arts practice, (b) elements of practice and instruction in each performing arts area, (c) how the creative process is a part of and enhanced by participation in these activities, and (d) guidelines for assessment of and through the arts, in addition to (e) describing the many mandated specific expectations for each subject and Grade level. However, few studies have addressed the training and experience of the teachers of the performing arts, and there is a pressing need for baseline data about performing arts instruction to inform hiring, certification, and professional development policies. Descriptive statistics are presented which detail many varied elements of performing arts instruction in Ontario schools, and ANOVAs are used to compare the differences between training groups on teachers perceptions of their comfort, the frequency and duration of their instruction, and their adherence to the curricular expectations.
    [Show full text]
  • Research Report
    RESEARCH REPORT OCUFA Ontario Confederation of University Faculty Associations Union des Associations des Professeurs des Universités de l’Ontario 83 Yonge Street, Suite 300, Toronto, Ontario M5C 1S8 Telephone: 416-979-2117 •Fax: 416-593-5607 • E-mail: [email protected] • Web Page: http://www.ocufa.on.ca Ontario Universities, the Double Cohort, and the Maclean’s Rankings: The Legacy of the Harris/Eves Years, 1995-2003 Michael J. Doucet, Ph.D. March 2004 Vol. 5, No. 1 Ontario Universities, the Double Cohort, and the Maclean’s Rankings: The Legacy of the Harris/Eves Years, 1995-2003 Executive Summary The legacy of the Harris/Eves governments from 1995-2003 was to leave Ontario’s system of public universities tenth and last in Canada on many critical measures of quality, opportunity and accessibility. If comparisons are extended to American public universities, Ontario looks even worse. The impact of this legacy has been reflected in the Maclean’s magazine rankings of Canadian universities, which have shown Ontario universities, with a few notable exceptions, dropping in relation to their peers in the rest of the country. Elected in 1995 on a platform based on provincial income tax cuts of 30 per cent and a reduction in the role of government, the Progressive Conservative government of Premier Mike Harris set out quickly to alter the structure of both government and government services. Most government departments were ordered to produce smaller budgets, and the Ministry of Education and Training was no exception. Universities were among the hardest hit of Ontario’s transfer-payment agencies, with budgets cut by $329.1 million between 1995 and 1998, for a cumulative impact of $2.3 billion by 2003.
    [Show full text]
  • September 11, 2018 7:00 P.M
    The Niagara Catholic District School Board through the charisms of faith, social justice, support and leadership, nurtures an enriching Catholic learning community for all to reach their full potential and become living witnesses of Christ. AGENDA AND MATERIAL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 11, 2018 7:00 P.M. FATHER KENNETH BURNS, C.S.C. BOARD ROOM CATHOLIC EDUCATION CENTRE, WELLAND, ONTARIO A. ROUTINE MATTERS 1. Opening Prayer – Trustee Burtnik - 2. Roll Call - 3. Approval of the Agenda - 4. Declaration of Conflict of Interest - 5. Approval of Minutes of the Committee of the Whole Meeting - 5.1 June 12, 2018 A5.1 5.2 June 20, 2018 A5.2 6. Consent Agenda Items - 6.1 Architect Selection for Monsignor Clancy Catholic Elementary School and A6.1 Our Lady of Mount Carmel Catholic Elementary School 6.2 Staff Development Department Professional Development Opportunities A6.2 6.3 In Camera Items F1.1, F1.2 and F4 - B. PRESENTATIONS C. COMMITTEE AND STAFF REPORTS 1. Director of Education and Senior Staff Introduction to the 2018-2019 School Year C1 2. Provisions of Special Education Programs and Services - Special Education Plan C2 3. Niagara Compliance Audit Committee Report C3 4. Monthly Updates 4.1 Student Senate Update - 4.2 Senior Staff Good News Update - D. INFORMATION 1. Trustee Information 1.1 Spotlight on Niagara Catholic – June 19, 2018 D1.1 1.2 Calendar of Events – September 2018 D1.2 2 1.3 Ontario Legislative Highlights – June 22, 2018, July & August 2018 D1.3 1.4 Letter to Parents and Guardians – September 2018 D1.4 1.5 Niagara Foundation for Catholic Education Golf Tournament – September 19, 2018 D1.5 1.6 OCSTA 2018 Fall Regional Meeting – September 26, 2018 D1.6 1.7 OCSTA 2018 Fall Regional Meeting Questions for Discussion D1.7 E.
    [Show full text]
  • The Toronto District School Board 1997-2003
    Academic Leadership: The Online Journal Volume 7 Article 11 Issue 4 Fall 2009 10-1-2009 Educational Restructuring and the Policy Process: The orT onto District School Board 1997-2003 Duncan Maclellan Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.fhsu.edu/alj Part of the Educational Leadership Commons, Higher Education Commons, and the Teacher Education and Professional Development Commons Recommended Citation Maclellan, Duncan (2009) "Educational Restructuring and the Policy Process: The orT onto District School Board 1997-2003," Academic Leadership: The Online Journal: Vol. 7 : Iss. 4 , Article 11. Available at: https://scholars.fhsu.edu/alj/vol7/iss4/11 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by FHSU Scholars Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Academic Leadership: The Online Journal by an authorized editor of FHSU Scholars Repository. academicleadership.org http://www.academicleadership.org/361/educational_restructuring _and_the_policy_process_the_toronto_district_school_board_199 7-2003/ Academic Leadership Journal Introduction On January 01, 1998, the Fewer School Boards Act, (Bill 104), came into effect in Ontario. Bill 104 led to significant administrative and structural changes to school boards across the province. In particular, the Act disallows school boards from collecting property tax to support their programs and services; instead, all school-board funding is now derived from the provincial government. The Act also reduced the number of school boards in Ontario from 124 to 72, and this led to a sharp decrease in trustee seats from 1,900 to 700. Remuneration for Ontario school board trustees, which had been up to $40,000 per year in large school boards, was set at a flat fee of $5000 annually.
    [Show full text]
  • Ontario's Environment and the Common Sense Revolution
    Ontarios Environment and the Common Sense Revolution: A Fifth Year Report Canadian Institute for Environmental Law and Policy LInstitut Canadien du Droit et de la Politique de LEnvironnement Acknowledgements Ontarios Environment and the Common Sense For more information about this publication, Revolution: A Fifth Year Report CIELAP or any of CIELAP’s other publications, please consult our website, call us, or write us. By Karen L. Clark LLB MA, Legal Analyst and James Yacoumidis MA, Research Canadian Institute for Associate Environmental Law and Policy 517 College Street, Suite 400 Toronto, Ontario M6G 4A2 The Canadian Institute for Environmental Law and Policy would like to thank the Joyce Foundation for their support for this project. Website: http://www.cielap.org E-mail: [email protected] The authors wish to thank everyone who helped Telephone: 416.923.3529 with this report. Fax: 416.923.5949 Special thanks go to Theresa McClenaghan, Copyright © 2000 Canadian Institute for Environ- CIELAP board member and counsel for the Cana- mental Law and Policy. All rights reserved. Except dian Environmental Law Association for her ex- for short excerpts quoted with credit to the copy- traordinary efforts reviewing this report. right holder, no part of this publication may be produced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmit- Special thanks are due as well to Mark Winfield for ted in any form or by any means, photomechanical, his guidance and expertise early in the project and electronic, mechanical, recorded or otherwise for reviewing early drafts. without prior written permission of the copyright holder. We would like to thank our other reviewers: Linda Pim, Tim Gray and Ian Attridge.
    [Show full text]
  • Kitchener, ON
    MEDIA RELEASE: Immediate REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF WATERLOO COUNCIL AGENDA Wednesday, February 28, 2001 6:45 p.m. Closed 7:00 p.m. Regular REGIONAL COUNCIL CHAMBER 150 Frederick Street, Kitchener, ON * DENOTES CHANGES TO, OR ITEMS NOT PART OF ORIGINAL AGENDA 1. MOMENT OF SILENCE 2. ROLL CALL 3. MOTION TO GO INTO CLOSED SESSION (if necessary) 4. MOTION TO RECONVENE IN OPEN SESSION (if necessary) 5. DECLARATION OF PECUNIARY INTEREST UNDER THE MUNICIPAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST ACT 6. PRESENTATIONS a) Alison Jackson, Friends of Doon Heritage Crossroads re: Cheque Presentation. b) Lloyd Wright, Chair of Joint Executive Committee re: Update on Hospital Redevelopment Plan. 7. DELEGATIONS a) Don Pavey, Cambridge Cycling Committee re: funding for construction of bike lanes, Cambridge. *b) Albert Ashley, Waterloo re: budget for cycling facilities. c) Mike Connolly, Waterloo re: 2001 Budget. d) Grants 1) Maureen Jordan, Serena K-W 2) Mary Heide-Miller, Serena K-W 3) Tony Jordan, Serena K-W 4) Steve Woodworth, K-W Right To Life 5) Jessica Ling, K-W Right To Life 6) Jane Richard, K-W Right To Life 7) Jolanta Scott, Planned Parenthood 8) Bruce Milne, Planned Parenthood - 2 - *9) Diane Wagner, Planned Parenthood * Refer to Community Health Department Issue Paper immediately following Page 4 of the Agenda. 10) Robert Achtemichuk, Executive Director, Waterloo Regional Arts Council 11) Isabella Stefanescu, Art Works *12) Jennifer Watson, Epilepsy Waterloo-Wellington re: funding. *13) Wayne McDonald, Chair Development Committee, Leadership Waterloo Region re: funding. *14) Margaret Bauer-Hoel, Executive Director, Volunteer Action Centre re: funding. *e) Craig Hawthorne, Halt 7 re: funding for transportation.
    [Show full text]
  • Irreconcilable Differences: the Corporatization of Canadian Universities
    Irreconcilable Differences: The Corporatization of Canadian Universities by Jamie Brownlee A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate and Postdoctoral Affairs in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Sociology (Specialization in Political Economy) Carleton University Ottawa, Ontario © 2014, Jamie Brownlee Abstract To date, there has yet to be a comprehensive national study of university corporatization in Canada. This study addresses this gap by reviewing the empirical basis, history, root causes and evolution of the transformation of higher education in Canada that has taken place over the past four decades. In this research, “corporatization” is used to refer to the process and resulting outcomes of the ascendance of business interests, values and models in the university system. Throughout the study, my two primary questions of interest are: (i) how has the corporatization of Canadian universities taken shape?; and (ii) what are the consequences of this restructuring both for higher education and society at large? The study begins with a brief historical review of the relationship between education and various sources of power, as well as some of the competing perspectives that have been used to explain university restructuring. I then review the main manifestations of the corporatization process, beginning with a detailed analysis of the casualization of academic labour. Drawing on a new and unique dataset collected through access to information requests, I provide a detailed account of the rise in the number of part-time and full-time contractually limited appointments in a number of Ontario institutions and discuss some of the impacts of this change.
    [Show full text]
  • Creating a Crisis: Selling Neoliberal Policy Through the Rebranding of Education
    Canadian Journal of Educational Administration and Policy, 183, 44-60 Creating a Crisis: Selling Neoliberal Policy Through the Rebranding of Education Lana Parker, York University Abstract How is it that neoliberal education policies, often lacking evidentiary basis, come to be en- dorsed—often by the very people they alienate and marginalize? This work seeks to expose how this kind of exclusive policy is sold to a public through intricate hortatory tools. Using critical policy analysis with an emphasis on historical development and political sociology, I employ marketing literature on branding as the analytical framework for a case study of the govern- ment’s education platform in Ontario, Canada. At the conclusion, I propose that it is necessary to step away from accountability jargon to reconsider the purpose of education and to recuperate what it means to be responsible for rather than accountable to one another. Keywords: politics, policy, accountability, media, educational policy, ethics Introduction That contemporary education policy is heavily influenced by neoliberalism has been broadly dis- cussed among scholars in recent decades. Evidence of the principal tenets of neoliberal theory in education commonly manifests in policy discourse as goals of economic rationality, efficiency, and accountability (Apple, 2005; Dale & Hyslop-Margison, 2010; Pinto, 2012). To interrogate the entrenchment of neoliberal values is to provide some context for these influences, allowing stakeholders insight into how and why policy is written and enacted.
    [Show full text]
  • Days of Action: Ontario's Extra-Parliamentary Opposition To
    Days of Action: Ontario's extra-parliamentary opposition to the Common Sense Revolution, 1995-1998 By Douglas James Nesbitt A thesis submitted to the Graduate Program in History in conformity with the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Queen’s University Kingston, Ontario, Canada May, 2018 Copyright ã Douglas James Nesbitt, 2018 Abstract From 1995 to 1998, Ontario was the site of a sustained political and industrial conflict between the provincial government of Premier Mike Harris and a loosely- coordinated protest movement of labour unions, community organizations, and activist groups. The struggle was aimed at the defeating the “Common Sense Revolution,” a sweeping neoliberal program advanced by the Progressive Conservative Party of Ontario. The program designed to renovate the state, rationalize the social safety net, repeal barriers to capital accumulation, and decisively weaken the strength of organized labour. What became a union-led extra-parliamentary opposition drew in large sections of the population often aligned with a political culture of statist collectivism encompassing both social democracy and “Red Toryism”. The movement emerged at a time when the two major parties aligned with such ideas embraced neoliberal policies. Under the leadership of Mike Harris, the Red Tories were pushed out of the Ontario Progressive Conservatives in the early 1990s. Meanwhile, the one-term New Democratic government of 1990-95 made a decisive turn towards neoliberal austerity amidst a catastrophic recession, declining federal transfers, and employer hostility. Through the union-led “Days of Action” of large political strikes, mass demonstrations, and numerous militant protests, the implementation of the Common Sense Revolution was slowed and weakened and the government’s popularity greatly diminished.
    [Show full text]
  • AR 2004-2004 Supplement
    Environmental Commissioner of Ontario 2004/2005 ANNUAL REPORT SUPPLEMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS ABBREVIATIONS...................................................................................................................................vii PREFACE: INTRODUCTION TO THE SUPPLEMENT....................................................................ix SECTION 1: ECO REVIEW OF UNPOSTED DECISIONS................................................................. 1 Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) – Policies .................................................................................... 1 The Attawapiskat River: “Proposed Candidate Waterway Provincial Park” vs. Mining Claims ....... 1 Furbearer Management Guidelines ............................................................................................. 2 Provincial Wildlife Population Monitoring Program .................................................................... 3 Endangering the Protection of Species at Risk in Ontario Parks .................................................... 4 Opening Ontario’s Parks to Hunting of Eastern Wolf ................................................................... 5 Wind Power Development on Crown Land ................................................................................. 6 Free Use Policy for Public Lands................................................................................................ 7 Update: Statements of Conservation Interest for Conservation Reserves........................................ 8 Ministry of the
    [Show full text]
  • AR 2004-2004 Supplement
    Environmental Commissioner of Ontario 2004/2005 ANNUAL REPORT SUPPLEMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS ABBREVIATIONS...................................................................................................................................vii PREFACE: INTRODUCTION TO THE SUPPLEMENT....................................................................ix SECTION 1: ECO REVIEW OF UNPOSTED DECISIONS................................................................. 1 Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) – Policies .................................................................................... 1 The Attawapiskat River: “Proposed Candidate Waterway Provincial Park” vs. Mining Claims ....... 1 Furbearer Management Guidelines ............................................................................................. 2 Provincial Wildlife Population Monitoring Program .................................................................... 3 Endangering the Protection of Species at Risk in Ontario Parks .................................................... 4 Opening Ontario’s Parks to Hunting of Eastern Wolf ................................................................... 5 Wind Power Development on Crown Land ................................................................................. 6 Free Use Policy for Public Lands................................................................................................ 7 Update: Statements of Conservation Interest for Conservation Reserves........................................ 8 Ministry of the
    [Show full text]
  • 59953512.Pdf
    Thank you to the reviewers Academic Reviewers • Sylvia Bashevkin, PhD. Principal of University College, University of Toronto. Professor of Political Sciences Former President of the Canadian Political Science Association (2003-2004) • Emily Gilbert, PhD. Director of Canadian Studies Program. University of Toronto. Professor of Geography and Canadian Studies • Nelson Wiseman, PhD. Associate Professor of Political Science. University of Toronto. CBC Constitutional Expert Publication Reviewers • Alex Greco, Editor, University of Toronto’s St. Michael’s College “The Mike” Student Newspaper. • Sam Presvelos, Executive Editor, LPE Media Group. • Dan Seljak, Executive Editor, University of Toronto’s St. Michael’s College “The Mike” Student Newspaper. Table of Contents • Introduction 01 • The 1990 Campaign and the 1995 Victory 02 • Healthcare Reform and Restructuring 03 • Education Reform 07 • Partisan Government Ads 11 • Government Consultants and Untendered Contracts 12 • Labour Relations 14 • Welfare and Tennant Reform 16 • Tax Cuts and Fees 17 • Special Interest Groups and Lobbying 18 • Transportation 21 • Highway 407 22 • City of Toronto Amalgamation 23 • The Hydro Legacy 24 • Bypassing the Legislative Process 26 • They are proposing what? 27 • The Ministerial Sequel and Radical Caucus 29 • Choosing Leaders 30 • Concluding Statements 30 Part II: The Effects of a Downsized Public Service and More Deregulation: The Harris Government in Ontario • Introduction 31 • Plastimet & USE Hickson Fire 32 • Walkerton 34 • Safety Inspection Privatization (TSSA - Technical Standards and Safety Authority) 36 • Concluding Statements 37 Mismanaging During Storms: The Mike Harris, Eves and Hudak Conservatives in Ontario By: Neville Britto It has been nearly 15 years since the self-proclaimed small “c” Neo-Conservatives first strolled the halls of Queen’s Park under one of Canada’s most right wing platforms, the “Common Sense Revolution”.
    [Show full text]