DOCSLIB.ORG

Ontario's Environment and the Common Sense Revolution

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ontario's Environment and the Common Sense Revolution Ontarios Environment and the Common Sense Revolution: A Fifth Year Report Canadian Institute for Environmental Law and Policy LInstitut Canadien du Droit et de la Politique de LEnvironnement Acknowledgements Ontarios Environment and the Common Sense For more information about this publication, Revolution: A Fifth Year Report CIELAP or any of CIELAP’s other publications, please consult our website, call us, or write us. By Karen L. Clark LLB MA, Legal Analyst and James Yacoumidis MA, Research Canadian Institute for Associate Environmental Law and Policy 517 College Street, Suite 400 Toronto, Ontario M6G 4A2 The Canadian Institute for Environmental Law and Policy would like to thank the Joyce Foundation for their support for this project. Website: http://www.cielap.org E-mail: [email protected] The authors wish to thank everyone who helped Telephone: 416.923.3529 with this report. Fax: 416.923.5949 Special thanks go to Theresa McClenaghan, Copyright © 2000 Canadian Institute for Environ- CIELAP board member and counsel for the Cana- mental Law and Policy. All rights reserved. Except dian Environmental Law Association for her ex- for short excerpts quoted with credit to the copy- traordinary efforts reviewing this report. right holder, no part of this publication may be produced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmit- Special thanks are due as well to Mark Winfield for ted in any form or by any means, photomechanical, his guidance and expertise early in the project and electronic, mechanical, recorded or otherwise for reviewing early drafts. without prior written permission of the copyright holder. We would like to thank our other reviewers: Linda Pim, Tim Gray and Ian Attridge. ISBN 1-896588-07-7 Thanks also to Anne Mitchell, Andrea Isaac, Megan Mills, Alan Levy, Grace Patterson, John Swaigen, Paul Muldoon , Rick Lindgren, Ramani Nadarajah, Clarrisa Morawski, Jack Gibbons, Brennain Lloyd, Gord Perks, Dan McDermott, Lois Corbett and Jason Thorne. Many Ontario provincial government employees, staff at the Environmental Assessment and Appeal Boards, and the Niagara Escarpment Commission also contributed their time and expertise to this report. Any errors, omissions or oversights in this report are the responsibility of the authors. Any opinions expressed are entirely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the opinion of CIELAP, its funders, supporters or the members of its board. Canadian Institute for Environmental Law & Policy CHAPTER I Introduction 6 Ontario’s environment and the Common Sense Revolution: The fifth in a series 6 Q: What are the top 10 things wrong with environmental protection under the Common Sense Revolution? #1: Ministries and agencies who protect the environment have too few staff and too few funds to do their job 6 #2: The government loads environmental responsibilities on small municipalities on the one hand and limits their ability to protect the environment on the other 8 #3: The Common Sense Revolution thinks environmental protection is red tape 8 #4: New laws and regulations do not adequately protect the environment 9 #5: The government beefs up enforcement, but will not commit to prevention and planning 9 #6: Under the Common Sense Revolution, “protected areas” are not protected 10 #7: The provincial government refuses to act when it should to protect the environment 11 #8: Industry self-regulation and self-monitoring increase the risk of environmental damage 11 #9: Common Sense protects game animals and commercial fisheries, not wildlife 12 #10: The Revolution fumbles national and international environmental protection initiatives 12 CHAPTER 2 Water 15 I The Common Sense Revolution and water resources so far 15 1.1 Defunding 15 1.2 Deregulation 15 1.3 Devolution of responsibility 15 II The Walkerton tragedy 16 2.1 Downloading responsibility and privatization of service broke the chain of accountability; inspections reduced 16 2.2 Discovery of E. coli contamination in the Walkerton water supply 16 2.3 No reporting regulations for drinking water 17 2.4 Early warnings ignored 17 2.5 Public inquiry called 18 2.6 New drinking water regulation 18 2.7 Province promises to step up inspections 18 2.8 Other post-Walkerton initiatives 18 III Ontario’s water: How much is safe to take? 19 3.1 Ground and surface water 19 3.2 Water-taking permits and water exports 20 3.2.1 “Moratorium” on new water-removal permits 21 3.3 $6 million for groundwater monitoring 21 3.4 Restrictions on inter-basin transfers of water 21 3.5 Ontario takes the most Great Lakes water 22 IV Water pollution on the rise 22 4.1 The official version: Things have never been better 22 4.2 The real big picture: Fewer resources, less protection 23 4.2.1 Nutrient runoff from agricultural operations: The need for regulatory action 23 4.2.2 Consultation on intensive agricultural operations: Government reluctant to regulate 24 4.2.3 After Walkerton, government more amenable to regulation 24 4.2.4 New government agricultural initiatives: Healthy futures in agriculture 25 4.2.5 OMAFRA field offices closed 25 4.2.6 Changes to the pesticides regulations 25 4.3 Increased violations of water pollution standards 25 4.4 Pollution discharges to Ontario’s water: Increasing violations, one prosecution 25 4.5 The ministry’s response 25 4.6 Ontario is North America’s third worst water polluter 26 4.7 Water standards revisions: Adopting the federal standards 26 V Federal/provincial program to protect the Great Lakes: Uncertain future 27 Ontario’s Environment and the Common Sense Revolution — A Fifth Year Report 1 5.1 Expiration of the Canada-Ontario Agreement on the Great Lakes ecosystem 27 5.1.1 Importance of renewing the COA 27 5.2 Provincial initiatives to protect the Great Lakes and Ontario’s watersheds 27 VI Conservation authorities: The struggle to protect Ontario’s lakes and watersheds 27 6.1 Conservation authorities: Limitations on water protection initiatives, no new provincial funding 27 6.2 Hardest hit: Ability to protect local water resources 28 6.3 Conservation authorities and golf 29 VII Other water-related changes or decisions 29 7.1 Proposed changes to the Lakes and Rivers Improvement Act 29 7.2 More plans to privatize shelved after Walkerton 29 VIII Conclusion 29 CHAPTER 3 Environmental decision-making 30 I The Common Sense Revolution and environmental decision-making so far 30 1.1 Defunding 30 1.2 Deregulation 30 1.3 Devolution of responsibility 30 II Common Sense and environmental decision-making: The first mandate 31 III Environmental boards and tribunals 32 3.1 The Environmental Assessment and Appeal Boards – emphasizing speed 32 3.2 Chair of the board, committed to efficiency 32 3.3 The auditor’s report and the ministry’s response 34 3.4 The Ontario Municipal Board – controversial decisions appear to undermine municipal autonomy; process undermines public confidence in decision-making 34 3.5 The Niagara Escarpment Commission – decision-making shifts from “fulfilling the purpose of the plan” IV Officers of the legislature 35 4.1 The Environmental Commissioner of Ontario 35 4.1.1 Controversial appointment draws opposition and media fire 36 4.1.2 Issues first special report on groundwater and intensive farming for Walkerton hearing 36 4.1.3 Environmental Bill of Rights litigation rights workshop 36 4.2 The Information and Privacy Commissioner – the Freedom of Information Act, an essential tool comes under scrutiny by province 37 V Environmental protection, public safety and industry self-regulation 37 5.1 Environmental emergencies small and large – risks may be increasing while the ability to manage risks grows less 37 5.1.1 Methane leak at Safety-Kleen 38 5.1.2 Sulphuric acid spill on rail line to Adams Mine 38 5.1.3 Reduced spill reporting requirements 38 5.1.4 Hickson plant fire 38 5.2 Nuclear safety still an issue 39 5.3 The TSSA and REVA reach milestones in self-regulation, but Bill 42 does not pass 39 5.3.1 The TSSA 39 5.3.2 REVA 40 5.4 Program approvals 41 5.4.1 Approvals that expired during the report period 41 5.4.2 New approvals granted during the report period 41 5.4.3 Approvals proposed during the report period 41 VI The Ministry of the Environment 42 6.1 Standards setting 42 6.2 The SWAT team 43 6.3 “Fixing” the Ministry of the Environment 43 6.4 Red tape – and all that implies 44 VII Education 44 7.1 Partners in Air 45 2 Canadian Institute for Environmental Law & Policy 7.2 Hunting manuals for inner-city schools 45 7.3 Making the miners of tomorrow 45 VIII Conclusion 45 CHAPTER 4 Garbage and hazardous waste 46 I The Common Sense Revolution and garbage issues so far 46 1.1 Defunding 46 1.2 Deregulation 46 1.3 Downloading 46 II Common Sense and garbage 47 III Waste approvals 47 3.1 Landfill environmental assessment hearings 47 3.2 Routine waste facility applications 48 3.3 Less routine waste facility applications 48 3.3.1 Trans-Cycle application refused 48 3.3.2 PCB and other hazardous waste incineration in Cornwall 48 3.3.3 Rotary kiln to burn contaminated soil 49 IV In Taro’s wake: A six-point action plan on hazardous waste 49 4.1 The Taro landfill 49 4.2 The response – the six-part plan 50 4.2.1 New hazardous waste regulations 50 4.3 Ontario: Open for toxics 51 V Municipal garbage and recycling, Part I – the Waste Diversion Organization 51 5.1 Provincial Auditor criticizes Ontario waste management in 1997 51 5.2 The government’s response: The WDO 52 VI Municipal garbage and recycling, Part II – the Adams Mine 52 6.1 The environmental assessment hearing – decided in haste 52 6.2 Application for judicial
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 12 01 Ganddhs Newsletter
    October 02, 2019 Page 1 of 15 Sheila Mccahon From: Historical Society Glencoe <[email protected]> Sent: September 18, 2019 6:55 PM To: Sheila Mccahon Subject: Glencoe & District Historical Society - Fall Newsletter 1 October 02, 2019 Page 2 of 15 Glencoe & District Historical Society Fall 2019 Newsletter 2 October 02, 2019 Page 3 of 15 G & DHS Executive Committee President - Ken Beecroft Vice President - JoAnn Galbraith Past President - Lorne Munro Treasurer - Marilyn McCallum Secretary - Mary Simpson Director - Harold Carruthers Director - Ina Nelms Director - Ken Willis Director - Dennis Harmsworth Well.... here it is September already. I don't know about you, but I found that the summer went by extremely quickly, maybe because of the damp and cool weather. At any rate, no doubt you've all been busy. Here at Glencoe & District Historical Society, we've been busy also. Since our big move to the Archives last Fall, we realize that there's more that we can and should be doing in the way of policy and procedural development, along with better identifying and tracking of our assets, especially books, documents and artifacts. To that end, we've established a committee of volunteers who will work on these goals.... More on that to come. With regret, I must let you know that G & DHS has lost another past Executive member. Karen Kendrick-Diamond passed away September 11th after a long and courageous battle with cancer. Karen was a life long resident of Glencoe and worked in the past at the Glencoe Library. Her 3 October 02, 2019 Page 4 of 15 Service of Remembrance will be September 26th at Van Heck Funeral Home in Glencoe.
    [Show full text]
  • A Tribute to Bill Davis and TVO
    Bil 65, passed on May 10, 2000 during te 37t Session, founded te Ontario Associaton of Former" Parliamentarians. It was te first bil in Ontario histry t be intoduced by a Legislatve Commitee. Editorial: David Warner (Chair), Lily Oddie Munro, Joe Spina and Alexa Hu$man We now have more members than ever before. Welcome to the following 16 MPPs who are now "members of O.A.F.P. 1. Shirley Collins 2. Aileen Carroll 3. Charles Godfrey 4. Marietta Roberts 5. Robert McKessock 6. Elizabeth Witmer 7. Margaret Birch 8. Don Cousens 9. Sophia Aggelonitis 10. Ernie Parsons 11. Carol Mitchell 12. Steve Mahoney 13. Rick Ferraro 14. Greg Sorbara 15. Alan Eagleson Premier Bill Davis speaking at the ceremony for the" 16. Rev. William Herman donation of the J.C.B. and E.C. Horwood Collection to the Ferrier Archives of Ontario 1979 " " A Tribute to Bill Davis and TVO TVO hosted a special Bill Davis tribute on Wednesday, November 6, 2013. The "Gala event was hosted by the Fermenting Cellar of the Distillery District." Bill Davis was the 18th Premier of Ontario, from 1971-1985. Davis was first elected as an MPP in the 1959 provincial election. Under John Robarts, he was "the cabinet minister, overseeing the education portfolio. " He succeeded Robarts as premier. After retiring, Davis was made a Companion of the Order of Canada in 1985. He has served on numerous corporate boards and "played a role in creating the Conservative Party of Canada. " Please visit TVO’s website for more information. PAGE !1 Bil 65, passed on May 10, 2000 during te 37t Session, founded te Ontario Associaton of Former" Parliamentarians.
    [Show full text]
  • I STATE of the ARTS: FACTORS INFLUENCING ONTARIO
    STATE OF THE ARTS: FACTORS INFLUENCING ONTARIO ELEMENTARY TEACHERS’ PERFORMING ARTS INSTRUCTION By Paul R. Vernon A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Education in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Master of Education Queen’s University Kingston, Ontario, Canada December 2014 Copyright © Paul R. Vernon, 2014 i Abstract This thesis examines Ontario elementary teachers perceptions of their teaching of the performing arts (i.e., music, drama, and dance), through responses to an online survey. Participants (N = 138) described multiple aspects of their training and experiences in the performing arts, their comfort in teaching the performing arts, and the degree to which they thought they were teaching the expectations in the curriculum document. The document “The Arts, Grades 1-8, 2009” clearly describes (a) many benefits of performing arts practice, (b) elements of practice and instruction in each performing arts area, (c) how the creative process is a part of and enhanced by participation in these activities, and (d) guidelines for assessment of and through the arts, in addition to (e) describing the many mandated specific expectations for each subject and Grade level. However, few studies have addressed the training and experience of the teachers of the performing arts, and there is a pressing need for baseline data about performing arts instruction to inform hiring, certification, and professional development policies. Descriptive statistics are presented which detail many varied elements of performing arts instruction in Ontario schools, and ANOVAs are used to compare the differences between training groups on teachers perceptions of their comfort, the frequency and duration of their instruction, and their adherence to the curricular expectations.
    [Show full text]
  • Report of the Select Committee on Electoral Reform
    Legislative Assemblée Assembly législative of Ontario de l'Ontario SELECT COMMITTEE ON ELECTORAL REFORM REPORT ON ELECTORAL REFORM 2nd Session, 38th Parliament 54 Elizabeth II Library and Archives Canada Cataloguing in Publication Data Ontario. Legislative Assembly. Select Committee on Electoral Reform Report on electoral reform [electronic resource] Issued also in French under title: Rapport de la réforme électorale. Electronic monograph in PDF format. Mode of access: World Wide Web. ISBN 0-7794-9375-3 1. Ontario. Legislative Assembly—Elections. 2. Elections—Ontario. 3. Voting—Ontario. I. Title. JL278 O56 2005 324.6’3’09713 C2005-964015-4 Legislative Assemblée Assembly législative of Ontario de l'Ontario The Honourable Mike Brown, M.P.P., Speaker of the Legislative Assembly. Sir, Your Select Committee on Electoral Reform has the honour to present its Report and commends it to the House. Caroline Di Cocco, M.P.P., Chair. Queen's Park November 2005 SELECT COMMITTEE ON ELECTORAL REFORM COMITÉ SPÉCIAL DE LA RÉFORME ÉLECTORALE Room 1405, Whitney Block, Toronto, Ontario M7A 1A2 SELECT COMMITTEE ON ELECTORAL REFORM MEMBERSHIP LIST CAROLINE DI COCCO Chair NORM MILLER Vice-Chair WAYNE ARTHURS KULDIP S. KULAR RICHARD PATTEN MICHAEL D. PRUE MONIQUE M. SMITH NORMAN STERLING KATHLEEN O. WYNNE Anne Stokes Clerk of the Committee Larry Johnston Research Officer i CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 Electoral Systems 1 Citizens’ Assembly Terms of Reference 2 Composition of the Assembly 2 Referendum Issues 4 Review of Electoral Reform 5 Future Role 5 List of Recommendations 6 INTRODUCTION 9 Mandate 9 Research Methodology 10 Assessment Criteria 10 Future Role 11 Acknowledgements 11 I.
    [Show full text]
  • Ontario's Greenbelt
    Ontario’s Greenbelt: Acres of Possibility Burkhard Mausberg Ontario’s Greenbelt turns 12 years old in 2017. At two million acres, it’s the world’s largest peri-urban protected area. The Greenbelt Act and Plan were passed with much fanfare in 2005, and while there was some loud opposition from certain affected landowners and municipalities, the plan received significant backing from conservationists and planning experts. Since its inception, the Greenbelt has enjoyed huge public approval: it is consistently the provincial government’s most popular environmental initiative, garnering more than 90% support. The Greenbelt addressed a growing frustration with land use planning in the Greater Toronto Area: Ontarians asked for better regional planning. They recognized the negative impacts of poor development and the loss of greenspace and farmland. But the Greenbelt’s roots go back longer than the last dozen years—to the mid-1970s, in fact, when Premier Bill Davis protected the Niagara Escarpment. Aside from creating Niagara Falls, the escarpment is known for its rich biodiversity, centuries-old cedar trees, and unique cliff ecology. Declared a UNESCO biosphere reserve, the Niagara Escarpment includes Great Lakes coastlines, woodlands, limestone alvar, oak savannahs, conifer swamps, and other signature features. Together these diverse habitats contain a premier level of species variety among Canadian biosphere reserves, including more than 300 bird species, 55 mammals, 36 reptiles and amphibians, and 90 fish varieties. In 2001, Ontario’s Premier Mike Harris declared the Oak Ridges Moraine protected from development. The premier understood that the moraine is an ecologically important landform, created by receding glaciers during the last ice age.
    [Show full text]
  • Harris Disorder’ and How Women Tried to Cure It
    Advocating for Advocacy: The ‘Harris Disorder’ and how women tried to cure it The following article was originally commissioned by Action Ontarienne contre la violence faite aux femmes as a context piece in training material for transitional support workers. While it outlines the roots of the provincial transitional housing and support program for women who experience violence, the context largely details the struggle to sustain women’s anti-violence advocacy in Ontario under the Harris regime and the impacts of that government’s policy on advocacy work to end violence against women. By Eileen Morrow Political and Economic Context The roots of the Transitional Housing and Support Program began over 15 years ago. At that time, political and economic shifts played an important role in determining how governments approached social programs, including supports for women experiencing violence. Shifts at both the federal and provincial levels affected women’s services and women’s lives. In 1994, the federal government began to consider social policy shifts reflecting neoliberal economic thinking that had been embraced by capitalist powers around the world. Neoliberal economic theory supports smaller government (including cuts to public services), balanced budgets and government debt reduction, tax cuts, less government regulation, privatization of public services, individual responsibility and unfettered business markets. Forces created by neoliberal economics—including the current worldwide economic crisis—still determine how government operates in Canada. A world economic shift may not at first seem connected to a small program for women in Ontario, but it affected the way the Transitional Housing and Support Program began. Federal government shifts By 1995, the Liberal government in Ottawa was ready to act on the neoliberal shift with policy decisions.
    [Show full text]
  • November 2001
    Canadian Political Science Association BULLETIN Association canadienne de science politique Volume XXX:2 November/novembre 2001 Contents / Sommaire President's Remarks / Le mot du président....................................................................... 1 Rapport du congrès annuel de l'ACSP / Report on the annual meeting of the CPSA (2001)...................................................................................................... 3 PETER H. RUSSELL, Doing Aboriginal Politics ................................................................. 7 HENRY JACEK, From Political Analyst to Political Practitioner ..................................... 11 ROBERT J. WILLIAMS, Ontario Legislative Internship Programme: Annual Report, 2000-2001......................................................................................... 15 Director's Report, Fall 2001....................................................................................... 17 Around the Departments / Les nouvelles des départements........................................... 18 Academic Positions Available / Offres d'emploi............................................................ 31 Calls for Papers / Appels de manuscrits ......................................................................... 36 PETER MEEKISON, CPSA Trust Fund / Fonds de prévoyance ACSP ............................... 41 Annonces diverses / Other Notices................................................................................. 42 publisher/éditeur Association canadienne de science politique
    [Show full text]
  • Ontario Quiz
    Ontario Quiz Try our Ontario Quiz & see how well you know Ontario. Answers appear at the bottom. 1. On Ontario’s Coat of Arms, what animal stands on a gold and green wreath? A) Beaver B) Owl C) Moose D) Black Bear 2. On Ontario’s Coat of Arms, the Latin motto translates as: A) Loyal she began, loyal she remains B) Always faithful, always true C) Second to none D) Liberty, Freedom, Truth 3. Which premier proposed that Ontario would have its own flag, and that it would be like the previous Canadian flag? A) Frost B) Robarts C) Davis D) Rae 4. Ontario’s Progressive Conservative government under right wing leader Mike Harris espoused what kind of revolution? A) Law and order B) Tax deductions C) People first D) Common sense 5. Which of the following was not an Ontario Liberal leader? A) Jim Bradley B) Robert Nixon C) Mitch Hepburn D) Cecil Rhodes 6. Which of the following is not a recognized political party in Ontario? A) White Rose B) Communist C) Family Coalition D) Libertarian 7. Tim Hudak, leader of Ontario’s PC party is from where? A) Crystal Beach B) Fort Erie C) Welland D) Port Colborne 8. Former Ontario Liberal leader, Dalton McGuinty was born where? A) Toronto B) Halifax C) Calgary D) Ottawa 9. The first Ontario Provincial Police detachment was located where? A) Timmins B) Cobalt C) Toronto D) Bala 10. The head of the OPP is called what? A) Commissioner B) Chief C) Superintendent D) Chief Superintendent 11. Which of the following was not a Lieutenant Governor of Ontario? A) Hillary Weston B) John Aird C) Roland Michener D) William Rowe 12.
    [Show full text]
  • Research Report
    RESEARCH REPORT OCUFA Ontario Confederation of University Faculty Associations Union des Associations des Professeurs des Universités de l’Ontario 83 Yonge Street, Suite 300, Toronto, Ontario M5C 1S8 Telephone: 416-979-2117 •Fax: 416-593-5607 • E-mail: [email protected] • Web Page: http://www.ocufa.on.ca Ontario Universities, the Double Cohort, and the Maclean’s Rankings: The Legacy of the Harris/Eves Years, 1995-2003 Michael J. Doucet, Ph.D. March 2004 Vol. 5, No. 1 Ontario Universities, the Double Cohort, and the Maclean’s Rankings: The Legacy of the Harris/Eves Years, 1995-2003 Executive Summary The legacy of the Harris/Eves governments from 1995-2003 was to leave Ontario’s system of public universities tenth and last in Canada on many critical measures of quality, opportunity and accessibility. If comparisons are extended to American public universities, Ontario looks even worse. The impact of this legacy has been reflected in the Maclean’s magazine rankings of Canadian universities, which have shown Ontario universities, with a few notable exceptions, dropping in relation to their peers in the rest of the country. Elected in 1995 on a platform based on provincial income tax cuts of 30 per cent and a reduction in the role of government, the Progressive Conservative government of Premier Mike Harris set out quickly to alter the structure of both government and government services. Most government departments were ordered to produce smaller budgets, and the Ministry of Education and Training was no exception. Universities were among the hardest hit of Ontario’s transfer-payment agencies, with budgets cut by $329.1 million between 1995 and 1998, for a cumulative impact of $2.3 billion by 2003.
    [Show full text]
  • The Federal State, Neoliberalism and the Left
    The manner of governing of Stephen Harper’s Conservative The phenomenon of centralized decentralization was first government might be characterized as a paradox with a purpose. A observed with respect to the British experience with Thatcherism. sharp centralization of authority over decision-making and politi- It was observed that the power of the state was in fact becoming cal management – particularly to augment policing, warmaking increasingly concentrated – ‘free market, strong state for these and market-enhancing capacities – is accompanied by an equally iron times’ – at the centre of the state. This centralization of power focused policy agenda that seeks to hollow out the distributive was necessary, politically speaking, as a means to drive through capacities of the Canadian federal state in the executive branches. an agenda to restructure the economy, defeat the trade unions, This simultaneous centralization and decentralization is a key fea- and erode the welfare state. The Thatcher-era Conservatives under- ture of the process of state restructuring under neoliberalism. stood that state power was a necessary element to restructure the state itself and its relations with different aspects of civil society. It is not a matter of bypassing or weakening the state in fa- vour of markets in general, but a change in the form of the state: This process had its origins in Canada under Brian Mulroney’s the executive of the state is strengthened relative to parliaments Conservative government of the 1980s (although the Liberal gov- and participative bodies; state economic apparatuses facilitating ernment’s of Pierre Trudeau first brought neoliberalism to Canada the internationalization of capital and market processes to bolster and began administrative restructuring in the last years of his capital accumulation are given policy precedence over administration).
    [Show full text]
  • Neoliberalism: Progressive Conservative Urbanism in Toronto, Canada
    “Common-Sense” Neoliberalism: Progressive Conservative Urbanism in Toronto, Canada Roger Keil Faculty of Environmental Studies, York University, Toronto, Canada; [email protected] This paper argues that urban neoliberalism can best be understood as a contradictory re-regulation of urban everyday life. Based on an analysis of neoliberalism as a new political economy and as a new set of technologies of power, the paper argues that the urban everyday is the site and product of the neoliberal transformation. Governments and corporations play a key role in redefining the conditions of everyday life through neoliberal policies and business practices. Part of this reorientation of everydayness, however, involves new forms of resistance and opposition, which include the kernel of a possible alternative urbanism. The epochal shift from a Keynesian-Fordist-welfarist to a post-Fordist-workfarist society is reflected in a marked restructuring of everyday life. The shift changes the socioeconomic conditions in cities. It also includes a reorienta- tion of identities, social conflicts, and ideologies towards a more explicitly culturalist differentiation. Social difference does not disappear, but actually becomes more pronounced; however, it gets articulated in or obscured by cultural terms of reference. The paper looks specifically at Toronto, Ontario, as a case study. An analysis of the explicitly neoliberal politics of the province’s Progressive Conservative (Tory) govern- ment under Mike Harris, first elected in 1995, demonstrates the pervasive re-regulation of everyday life affecting a wide variety of people in Toronto and elsewhere. Much of this process is directly attributable to provincial policies, a consequence of Canada’s constitutional system, which does not give municipalities autonomy but makes them “creatures of provinces.” However, the paper also argues that Toronto’s elites have aided and abetted the provincial “Common-Sense” Revolution through neoliberal policies and actions on their own.
    [Show full text]
  • Hudak Headed for Majority in Ontario: Poll
    Hudak headed for majority in Ontario: poll Peter Kuitenbrouwer | Jun 26, 2011 – 4:35 PM ET | Last Updated: Jun 26, 2011 5:17 PM ET Tim Hudak’s Progressive Conservatives are heading to a majority government in the Ontario election on Oct.6, a new poll by Forum Research suggests. The poll of 3,198 people, a large sample size, suggests that 41% of Ontario voters will vote for the PCs, 26% support the reigning Liberal Party, 22% want the NDP to win, and 8% back the Green Party. The poll found the Tories and Liberals neck-in-neck in Toronto, whereas in Eastern Ontario 50% support the Tories compared to just 25% for the Liberals in that region. Lorne Bozinoff, president of Forum Research, said Sunday that, although the election is still over three months away, much of that is during the sleepy summer months, giving the Liberals precious little time to make up the wide gap in voter preference. “We did learn from a couple of months ago [in the federal election] that campaigns do matter,” Mr. Bozinoff said. “Nobody predicted what happened with the NDP. Still, it’s hard to see how the Ontario Liberals are going to gain traction if they release their platform in the summer.” He said the poll, conducted last Tuesday and Wednesday, suggests that conservatism in Ontario is “the new norm,” with the provincial intentions mimicking strong support for Rob Ford in Toronto and for Conservatives federally. The poll suggests the Liberals will get their clocks cleaned in greater Toronto, losing 16 of their 905 seats and 11 of the seats they hold in the 416.
    [Show full text]