DOCSLIB.ORG

The Quest for a Mothertongue

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Quest for a Mothertongue The Quest for a Mothertongue ~~~ Biological evolution operates according to might define this boundary as that which three primary rules: Genetic mutations defines a “language”). accommodate evolution, and they are random Since English is the language of world in their appearance. Environmental factors commerce, the quest will start here. It may determine whether these mutations are seem that English may hold out against the beneficial, detrimental, or simply neutral. passage of time, but the fact is that English on Over enough time, an isolated population can the whole is less than 2,000 years old. build up enough mutations such that English-speakers living just 1,000 years ago breeding with the original population becomes impossible (this is the boundary would likely have a tough time understanding the English of today. Consider the following: that defines a “species”). Old English – Beowulf. Similarly, linguistic evolution is made possible by the following scheme: Slight Hƿæt Ƿe Ȝardena in ȝeardaȝum þeod-cyninȝa þrym changes in the way certain words are ȝefrunon huða æþelinȝas ellen fremedon. (Hark! We of pronounced and/or used accommodates the Spear-Danes in years’ past, of the clan-kings, heard of their glory; how those noblemen performed great deeds.) linguistic evolution. These occur according to personal flavour and group acceptance of Middle English – The Canterbury Tales. that, and ultimately can define area-specific “Wepyng and waylyng, care and oother sorwe I knowe dialects. Finally, these changes can add up in ynogh, on even and a-morwe,” Quod the Marchant, “and a fringe population over time to create a so doon oother mo That wedded been.” (“Weeping and distinct language that no longer can be wailing, care and other sorrow I know enough, in the understood by the original population (one evening and in the morning,” said the Merchant, “and so does many another who have been married.”) The Germanic Language Family. Linguists place English within the Germanic Language Family of languages, so here I hope to confirm the presence of the languages specific to this family that marks the first level of our Quest. Pronouns: English I/me/my thou/thee/th he/she/it we/us/our ye/you/your they/them/thei who/what y r German ich/mich/mi du/dich/dir er/sie/es wir/uns/unser ihr/euch/euer sie/ihnen/ihrer wer/was r Dutch ik/mij/mijn jij/jou/jouw hij/zij/het wij/ons/ons jullie zij/hen/hun wie/wat Danish jeg/mig/min du/dig/din han/hun/det vi/os/vor i/jer/jeres de/dem/deres hvem/hva d Swedish jag/mig/min du/du/din han/hon/det vi/oss/vår ni/er/er de/dem/deras vem/vad Norwegia jeg/meg/mi du/deg/din han/hun/det vi/oss/vår dere/dere/deres de/dem/deres hvem/hva n n Icelandic ég/mig/mín þú/þig/þín Hann/hún/þa við/okkur/okka þið/ykkur/ykka þeir/þá/þeirra hver/hvað ð r r The English pronouns are the Elizabethan forms, so that similarities between the other languages here is more visible. The Lord’s Prayer: >English: Our Father, who art in Heaven; hallowed be thy name. >German: Vater unser im Himmel, geheiligt werde Dein Name. >Dutch: Onze Vader, die in de hemelen zijt! Uw naam worde geheiligd. >Danish: Fader Vor, du som er i Himlene, helliget vorde dit Navn, >Swedish: Fader wår, sum är ude himmelen: helgat ware titt namn, >Norwegian: Vor Fader, du som er i Himlene! Helliget vorde dit Navn. >Icelandic: Faðir vor, þú sem ert á himnum. Helgist þitt nafn. In all, there is a nice correlation among the languages that belong to the Germanic Language Family; above is the first line of the Lord’s Prayer in the five major Germanic languages shown here. *Proto-Germanic: I Thou He/she/it We Ye They I ek þu hez/sye/hit wez yuz þe/þye/þa Me mek þek hem/hez/hit uns yiz þem/þen/þa My min þin þen/hen/þen unser yizer þez/þiz/þez That/this þez/þe/þat þe/þi/þen Who/what hwa/hwam/hwas, hwat/hwat/hwas >Lord’s Prayer = Faþer unser, az þu en hemellan; halleȝado warþo namen þin. Indo-European Language Family. Germanic belongs to the Indo-European family, alongside Romance, Slavic, and Indic languages. These will be compared below. Pronouns: I thou he/she/i we ye they who/w t hat Latin ego/mē/meī tū/tē/tuī is/ea/id nōs/nōs/noster vōs/vōs/vester eī/eae/ea qui/quid Greek εγώ/με/μoυ σύ/σε/σoυ αυτός/αυτή/ εμείς/μας/μας εσείς/σας/σας αυτoί/αυτoύς/ πoιός/τι αυτό αυτών Greek ἐγώ/ἐμέ/ἐμo σύ/σέ/σoὒ αὐτός/αὐτή/ ἡμεἲς/ἡμἂς/ἡμὢν ὑμεἲς/ὑμἂς/ὑμὢν αὐτoί/αὐταί/α τίς/τί (Biblica ὒ αὐτό ὐτά l) Sanskri aham/mām/ tvam/tvām/ ayam/iyam/i vayam/asmān/as yūyam/yuṣmān/yuṣ ime/imāni/imā ke/kim mama tava dam mākam mākam ḥ t Russian я/мeня mы/meбя oн/oнa/oнo мы/нac вы/вac oнu/ux кmo/чmo Armeni es/inj/im du/k’ez/k’o na/nra- menk'/mez/mer duk'/jez/jer nran-k’/nran-c’ ov/inch’ n/nra an Irish mé tú sé/sí muid/sinn sibh siad cé/cad Welsh i/fi/mi ti fe/fo/ef/hi ni hwi i pwy/pa Lithuan àš/manè/ma tù/tavè/tav jìs/jì mẽs/mùs/mu ́sų ju ̃s/jùms/ju ́sų jiẽ/jõs kas/ką ian nę̃ s ę̃ s Farsi man/-am to/-at u/-aš mā/-emān šomā/-etān išān/-ešān kō/pi The Lord’s Prayer: >Latin: Pater Noster qui es in caelis, sanctificetur Nomen Tuum. >Greek (Biblical): Πάτερ ἠμῶν ὀ ἐν τοῖς οὐρανοῖς; ἀγιασθήτω τὸ ὄνομά σου. >Russian: Oтче наш, Иже еcи на нeбece! Дa cвятитcя имя Твoe, >Armenian: Mer hayr or erknk’umn es: surb lini k’o anunə. (note heavy influence of Caucasian…) >Welsh: Ein Tad, yr hwn wyt yn y nefoedd, sancteiddier dy enw; >Lithuanian: Tēve musų, kurs esi danguje, Buk švenčiamas vardas tavo. *Proto-Indo-European: I Thou He/she/it We Ye They I ʔegom tū ʔe/ʔeʕ/ʔed wes yus ʔi/ʔiʕ/ʔe Me mē tē ʔem/ʔeʕm/ʔed ṇs ẉs ʔis/ʔiʕs/ʔe My meṇe teẉe ʔes/ʔeʕs/ʔes ṇser ẉser ʔesom That/this sā/se/tod te/ti/tā Who/what k’wo/k’wom/k’wos, k’wod/k’wod/k’wos >Lord’s Prayer = Pater ṇser, k’we ʔesse kemellēb’yo; swanktitar ʕṇomōm teẉe. The Eurasiatic Language Family. A number of European and Asiatic languages appear to be related to one another, and may be related to Indo-European via a proposed “Eurasiatic” language family that likely dated to around 10 ka. Pronouns: I thou he/she/it we ye they who/what Finnish minä sinä hän me te he kuka/mitä Estonian mina sina tema meie teie nemad keda/mida Hungarian én te ő mi ti ők ki/mit Turkish ben sen o biz siz onlar kim/ne Turkmen men sen ol biz siz olar Tatar min sin ul bez sez alar Mongolian bi chi ter bid ta ted khen/yuu baina Here, some divergence exists for “I” and “what” between these languages and Indo-European that is meant also to be related to this Family. Note, too, that the Finnish 3rd-person pronoun may be loaned from the Scandinavian Germanic languages. The Lord’s Prayer: >Finnish: Isä meidän, joka olet taivaissa, pyhitetty olkoon Sinun Nimesi, >Estonian: Meije Izsa taiwan: pühhändetuz sago sinno nimmi. >Hungarian: Mi Atyánk, ki vagy a’ mennyekben, szenteltessék meg a’ te neved. >Turkish: Ey gök-ler-de olan Baba-mız İsm-in mukaddes olsun >Mongolian: Tuйнхγγ энэ мэт зaлбupaгmyн: Tэнгэp дэx бuднuй Эцэг эѳ, *Proto-Eurasiatic: I Thou He/she/it We Ye They I menna tenna thenna menda tenda thenda Me menadhtenadh thenadh mendadh tendadh thendadh My menan tenan thenan mendan tendan thendan That/this tæda/tæta nōna/nēna Who/what khuka/kheda meda >Lord’s Prayer = Atta mendan, menghakkədhæm; phujjāndattəkas mōkhaddat nemedya. The Nostratic Language Family. The Nostratic family of languages includes the Eurasiatic family as well as languages spoken in the nation of Georgia (a West-Caspianic nation) and the Dravidian languages spoken in Southern India and Western Siam. Pronouns: I thou he/she/it we ye they who/what Georgian me/če-mi šen/šeni e-sa/mu-š-i čven/čveni tkven/tkveni isini vin/ra Svan mi/mi-šgu si/i-sgu e-ǯa/m-ič-a gu-šgwey/ni- sgăy/i-sgwey šgwey Malayalam ɲaːn n̪ iː aʋan/aʋaːɭ/at̪uː n̪ammaɭ/ɲaŋŋaɭ n̪ iŋŋaɭ aʋar aːɾɨ̆/en̪ t̪ɨ̆ Kannada nɑːnu niːnu avanu nāvu neevu avaru yāru/enu Tamil nɑːɳ niː avaṉ nām/nāṅkaḷ nīṅkaḷ avarkaḷ yār/eṉṉa Telugu neːnu nuvːu/niːvu at̪aɽu/at̪anu meːmu/manamu miːru/tamaru vɑːɭːu/avɪ evaru/eːmiʈi Georgian and Svan are Kartvelian languages, and linguistically they appear more similar to Eurasiatic than the remaining four languages that belong to the Dravidian family of languages. The Lord’s Prayer: >Georgian: Mamao tšweno romeli χar tsatha šina. Tsmida-iqawn saχeli šeni. >Kannada: Paralokathalliruva namma thandye ninna naamavu parisuddavaagirali ninna rajyavu barali >Malayalam: Svarggasthan-āya ñangaĺude pitāvē ninte nāmam pařiśuddham-ākkappedaṇam >Tamil: Paramaṇṭalaṅkaḷilirukkirā eṅkaḷ pitāwē ummuṭaiya ṅāman pārītšutta-māwatāka *Proto-Nostratic: I Thou He/she/it We Ye They I mæna tæna dwæna menkwa tenkwa dwenkwa Me -ma -ta -na -me -te -ne My mænan tænan dwænan menkwṇa tenkwṇa dwenkwṇa That/this tǣdwa/tǣtwa neuna/neina Who/what kweda mweda >Lord’s Prayer = Paraλmǣndākwedəḍṇekwa Dada menkwṇa; mwəṇṭǣya śænya pārīčwdhaqebhədəṇa.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Rift Valley Bibliography Version 1.3
    Griscom, Richard, Andrew Harvey, and Anne Kruijt (eds.). 2020. Rift Valley Bibliography Version 1.3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4300224 Rift Valley Bibliography Version 1.3 December 1st, 2020 1 Introduction This document is a bibliography of the languages of the Rift Valley Area of Tanzania, which is home to dozens of distinctive ethnic groups and languages. Uniquely, it is the meeting place of languages from three of the largest language families in Africa—Nilo-Saharan, Niger-Congo, and Afro-Asiatic—as well as Sandawe, a language with possible affinity with the so-called 'Khoisan' group, and Hadza, a language isolate, which means that it is not known to be related to any other languages currently spoken. The Rift Valley Bibliography is compiled by members of the Rift Valley Network and is hosted on the network website at the Rift Valley Bibliography page. This is a text version of the bibliography, but other formats of the bibliography are available on the website for those who use reference manager software (e.g. Zotero, EndNote, or Mendeley), and a Zotero Group is used to make additions and changes to the bibliography. A PDF Collection of selected entries is available for members of the Rift Valley Network only, and release notes are made available for each release. For comments or questions related to this bibliography, please send an email to [email protected]. 1 2 Table of Contents Table of Contents 1 Introduction.............................................................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • M01hjbr 10Ngujb
    CONTENTS Page Feature 1 Linguistic Methodology and Distant Linguistic Comparison M01HJBR Allan R. Bomhard 4 Toward a Defmitive Classification of the World's Languages 10NGUJB Harold C. Fleming 30 Pama-Nyungan II and Tasmanian NJEWSLJETTJER OF Geoff O'Grady and Susan Fitzgerald tHJE ASSOCIAtiON 36 C. C. Uhlenbeck and Dene-Caucasian W. Wi/fried Schuhmacher FOR tHJE StuDY OF 37 Book Review: Language in the Americas (1987) LANGUAGJE IN Reviewed by Stefan Liedtke PREHIStORY 39 In the Public Media: - Late Dates in East Polynesia (Science News) - A Geneticist Maps Ancient Migrations (New York Times) 40 Brief Communication: Seeking the Traces ofthe Indo-European Homeland. Vac/av Blaiek 41 Software: Gamma UniVerse/or Windows 42 Letters to the Editor 43 Editorial 43 ASLIP Business 44 Books for Review AIM &SCOPE The Association for the Study of Language in Prehistory (ASLIP) is a nonprofit organization, incorporated under the laws of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. Its purpose is to encourage and support the study of language in prehistory in all fields and by all means, including research on the early evolution of human language, supporting conferences, setting up a databank, and publishing a newsletter and/or journal to report these activities. Annual dues for ASLIP membership and subscription to Mother Tongue are US $15.00 in all countries except those with currency problems. In those countries, annual dues are zero ($0.00). European distribution: All members living in Europe (up to the borders of Asia), and not having currency problems, will pay their annual dues to, and receive Mother Tongue from: Prof. Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Some Principles of the Use of Macro-Areas Language Dynamics &A
    Online Appendix for Harald Hammarstr¨om& Mark Donohue (2014) Some Principles of the Use of Macro-Areas Language Dynamics & Change Harald Hammarstr¨om& Mark Donohue The following document lists the languages of the world and their as- signment to the macro-areas described in the main body of the paper as well as the WALS macro-area for languages featured in the WALS 2005 edi- tion. 7160 languages are included, which represent all languages for which we had coordinates available1. Every language is given with its ISO-639-3 code (if it has one) for proper identification. The mapping between WALS languages and ISO-codes was done by using the mapping downloadable from the 2011 online WALS edition2 (because a number of errors in the mapping were corrected for the 2011 edition). 38 WALS languages are not given an ISO-code in the 2011 mapping, 36 of these have been assigned their appropri- ate iso-code based on the sources the WALS lists for the respective language. This was not possible for Tasmanian (WALS-code: tsm) because the WALS mixes data from very different Tasmanian languages and for Kualan (WALS- code: kua) because no source is given. 17 WALS-languages were assigned ISO-codes which have subsequently been retired { these have been assigned their appropriate updated ISO-code. In many cases, a WALS-language is mapped to several ISO-codes. As this has no bearing for the assignment to macro-areas, multiple mappings have been retained. 1There are another couple of hundred languages which are attested but for which our database currently lacks coordinates.
    [Show full text]
  • Information to Users
    INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UM l films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type o f computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely afreet reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UME a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, b^inning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each original is also photographed in one exposure and is included in reduced form at the back o f the book. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy, ffigher quality 6” x 9” black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UM l directly to order. UMl A Bell & Howell Infoimation Company 300 North Zeeb Road, Ann Arbor MI 48106-1346 USA 313/761-4700 800/521-0600 Velar-Initial Etyma and Issues in Comparative Pama-Nyungan by Susan Ann Fitzgerald B.A.. University of V ictoria. 1989 VI.A.
    [Show full text]
  • On Numeral Complexity in Hunter-Gatherer Languages
    On numeral complexity in hunter-gatherer languages PATIENCE EPPS, CLAIRE BOWERN, CYNTHIA A. HANSEN, JANE H. HILL, and JASON ZENTZ Abstract Numerals vary extensively across the world’s languages, ranging from no pre- cise numeral terms to practically infinite limits. Particularly of interest is the category of “small” or low-limit numeral systems; these are often associated with hunter-gatherer groups, but this connection has not yet been demonstrated by a systematic study. Here we present the results of a wide-scale survey of hunter-gatherer numerals. We compare these to agriculturalist languages in the same regions, and consider them against the broader typological backdrop of contemporary numeral systems in the world’s languages. We find that cor- relations with subsistence pattern are relatively weak, but that numeral trends are clearly areal. Keywords: borrowing, hunter-gatherers, linguistic area, number systems, nu- merals 1. Introduction Numerals are intriguing as a linguistic category: they are lexical elements on the one hand, but on the other they are effectively grammatical in that they may involve a generative system to derive higher values, and they interact with grammatical systems of quantification. Numeral systems are particularly note- worthy for their considerable crosslinguistic variation, such that languages may range from having no precise numeral terms at all to having systems whose limits are practically infinite. As Andersen (2005: 26) points out, numerals are thus a “liminal” linguistic category that is subject to cultural elaboration. Recent work has called attention to this variation among numeral systems, particularly with reference to systems having very low limits (for example, see Evans & Levinson 2009, D.
    [Show full text]
  • Transparency in Language a Typological Study
    Transparency in language A typological study Published by LOT phone: +31 30 253 6111 Trans 10 3512 JK Utrecht e-mail: [email protected] The Netherlands http://www.lotschool.nl Cover illustration © 2011: Sanne Leufkens – image from the performance ‘Celebration’ ISBN: 978-94-6093-162-8 NUR 616 Copyright © 2015: Sterre Leufkens. All rights reserved. Transparency in language A typological study ACADEMISCH PROEFSCHRIFT ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor aan de Universiteit van Amsterdam op gezag van de Rector Magnificus prof. dr. D.C. van den Boom ten overstaan van een door het college voor promoties ingestelde commissie, in het openbaar te verdedigen in de Agnietenkapel op vrijdag 23 januari 2015, te 10.00 uur door Sterre Cécile Leufkens geboren te Delft Promotiecommissie Promotor: Prof. dr. P.C. Hengeveld Copromotor: Dr. N.S.H. Smith Overige leden: Prof. dr. E.O. Aboh Dr. J. Audring Prof. dr. Ö. Dahl Prof. dr. M.E. Keizer Prof. dr. F.P. Weerman Faculteit der Geesteswetenschappen i Acknowledgments When I speak about my PhD project, it appears to cover a time-span of four years, in which I performed a number of actions that resulted in this book. In fact, the limits of the project are not so clear. It started when I first heard about linguistics, and it will end when we all stop thinking about transparency, which hopefully will not be the case any time soon. Moreover, even though I might have spent most time and effort to ‘complete’ this project, it is definitely not just my work. Many people have contributed directly or indirectly, by thinking about transparency, or thinking about me.
    [Show full text]
  • Voices of Aboriginal Tasmania Ningina Tunapri Education
    voices of aboriginal tasmania ningenneh tunapry education guide Written by Andy Baird © Tasmanian Museum and Art Gallery 2008 voices of aboriginal tasmania ningenneh tunapry A guide for students and teachers visiting curricula guide ningenneh tunapry, the Tasmanian Aboriginal A separate document outlining the curricula links for exhibition at the Tasmanian Museum and the ningenneh tunapry exhibition and this guide is Art Gallery available online at www.tmag.tas.gov.au/education/ Suitable for middle and secondary school resources Years 5 to 10, (students aged 10–17) suggested focus areas across the The guide is ideal for teachers and students of History and Society, Science, English and the Arts, curricula: and encompasses many areas of the National Primary Statements of Learning for Civics and Citizenship, as well as the Tasmanian Curriculum. Oral Stories: past and present (Creation stories, contemporary poetry, music) Traditional Life Continuing Culture: necklace making, basket weaving, mutton-birding Secondary Historical perspectives Repatriation of Aboriginal remains Recognition: Stolen Generation stories: the apology, land rights Art: contemporary and traditional Indigenous land management Activities in this guide that can be done at school or as research are indicated as *classroom Activites based within the TMAG are indicated as *museum Above: Brendon ‘Buck’ Brown on the bark canoe 1 voices of aboriginal tasmania contents This guide, and the new ningenneh tunapry exhibition in the Tasmanian Museum and Art Gallery, looks at the following
    [Show full text]
  • The Encyclopedia of Global Human Migration
    guo namuuiy B/121188 The Encyclopedia of Global Human Migration General Editor Immanuel Ness Volume V Rem-Z )WILEY~BLACKWELL A John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., Publication Contents Volume I Contents to Volume I: Prehistory IX Lexicon xiii Notes on Contributors xlvii Introduction cxxvi Acknowledgments cxxxii Abbreviations cxxxv Maps cxxxvii Prehistory Part I: The Peopling of the World during the Pleistocene 7 Part II: Holocene migrations 11 Volume II Global Human Migration A—Cro 417-1122 Volume III Global Human Migration Cru-Ind 1123-1810 Volume IV Global Human Migration Ind-Rem 1811-2550 Volume V Global Human Migration Rem-Z 2551-3180 Index to Volume I: Prehistory 3181 Index to Volumes II-V 3197 3182 INDEX TO VOLUME I: PREHISTORY Anatolia (confd) Arawak culture, 379-80, 394, 397 Ice Age land bridge, 327 Mesolithic, 143^4 language, 87, 89, 93, 384, 385, language families, 87, 328 migrations into Europe, 141—4 386-7, 392, 396-7 linguistic history, 327-32 see also Anatolia Hypothesis origin, 379 lithic technologies, 44-5, 58 Neolithic culture, 139-40, 141, society, 397 megafauna, 56—7 142, 143-4 speakers, 376, 378, 379-80 migrations within, 57 pottery, 143 spread, 380, 386-7, 398 modern populations, 254 see also Turkey archaeological evidence, 32, 293 Northern Territories, 330 Anatolia Hypothesis, 92, 161, 163, cultural changes, 40-6, 108-9 Pleistocene, 327 169,170-1 paucity, 14, 104, 112 Western Desert, 330 Ancient Egypt and radiocarbon dating see see also Tasmania archaeological sites, 135—6, under radiocarbon dating Australo-Melanesians, 220
    [Show full text]
  • Southern Africa As a Phonological Area
    Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology/Linguistics "Speaking (of) Khoisan" A symposium reviewing African prehistory 16/05/2015 Southern Africa as a phonological area Christfried Naumann & Hans-Jörg Bibiko [email protected] Quelle: Clements & Rialland ( 2008 : 37 ) Contents 1. Introduction 3-15 2. Procedure 16-19 3. Results: Kalahari Basin 20-28 4. Results: Southeastern Bantu 29-42 5. Results: Southern Africa 43-54 (6. Local and dependent features - excluded) 55-61 7. MDS and k-means 62-68 8. Summary 69 (9. Contact scenarios) 70-74 Acknowledgements 75 References 76-77 2 "Speaking (of) Khoisan", 16/05/2015 Southern Africa as a phonological area 1. Introduction Phonological similarities • large consonantal inventory (45 c.) • clicks • aspirated and ejective stops • dorsal affricate 3 "Speaking (of) Khoisan", 16/05/2015 Southern Africa as a phonological area 1. Introduction Phonological similarities • large consonantal inventory (50 c.) • clicks • aspirated, slack voiced, ejective and imploisve stops •(dorsal affricate) lateral obstruents • 4 "Speaking (of) Khoisan", 16/05/2015 Southern Africa as a phonological area 1. Introduction Phonological similarities • large consonantal inventory (68 c.) • (clicks) • aspirated, breathy and implosive stops • lateral obstruents 5 "Speaking (of) Khoisan", 16/05/2015 Southern Africa as a phonological area 1. Introduction Example: Distribution of ejectives/glottalized consonants Clements & Rialland (2008: 62) Maddieson (2013) 6 "Speaking (of) Khoisan", 16/05/2015 Southern Africa
    [Show full text]
  • 4Th European Workshop on Australian Languages University of Manchester, Fr/Sa, 12-13 December 2008 Room A102, Samuel Alexander Building, Oxford Road Campus
    4th European Workshop on Australian Languages University of Manchester, Fr/Sa, 12-13 December 2008 Room A102, Samuel Alexander Building, Oxford Road Campus Fr 12 Dec 14.00-14.45 William McGregor Tense, mood and aspect in Nyulnyul 14.45-15.30 Felicity Meakins Taking a stance on coverbs: Positional verb constructions in Gurindji Kriol Coffee Break (Foyer of Samuel Alexander Building) 16.00-16.45 Clair Hill Discourse functions of ignoratives in Umpila and Kuuku Ya'u 16.45-17.30 Jean-Christophe The genetic status of Umpithamu Verstraete 17.30-18.15 Anthony Grant The Lower Burdekin languages: a reappraisal Dinner in the Curry Mile (details to be announced) Sat 13 Dec 9.30-10.15 Claire Bowern Hunter-Gatherer Language Change: An overview 10.15-11.00 Natalie Weber Lexical and morphological reconstruction of Marrngu Coffee Break (Foyer) 11.30-12.15 Robert The role of pragmatics in the interpretation of Mailhammer aspectual verb forms in Amurdak 12.15-13.00 Dorothea Motion and travel in Jaminjung and Kriol (to be conf) Hoffmann Lunch at the Museum Café, University of Manchester, Oxford Rd Campus 14.30-15.15 Candide Simard Prosodic units in Jaminjung 15.15-16.00 Eva Schultze- Form and function of discontinuous noun Berndt phrases in Jaminjung Coffee Break (Foyer) 16.30-17.15 Stephan Spronck Categories of social cognition in Ngarinyin 17.15-18.00 Stefanie Constructional effects of inanimate Agents in Fauconnier Australian languages ABSTRACTS The role of pragmatics in the interpretation of aspectual verb forms in Amurdak Robert Mailhammer, University of Eichstätt This paper addresses the role of pragmatics in the interpretation of aspectual forms of verb forms in Amurdak, an Iwaidjan language from Northern Arnhem Land.
    [Show full text]
  • The Kx'a Family
    Journal of Asian and African Studies, No., Article The Kx’a Family A New Khoisan Genealogy1) Heine, Bernd (Institut für Afrikanistik Universität zu Köln) Honken, Henry (Independent Scholar) e question of whether there is a genetic unit called “Khoisan”, as proposed by Greenberg (1963), or whether there are a number of independent genetic stocks of languages within the “Khoisan” area has been discussed controver- sially in the history of Khoisan linguistics, with the second position now being prevalent. In the present study it is argued that there is a genetic unit that includes languages that are traditionally associated with both the Northern and the Southern Khoisan groupings, the languages included being !Xun (or “Ju” or “Ju|hoan”) and Hoan. Building on the work of Honken (2004), the comparative method will be employed to reconstruct some phonological fea- tures of the common ancestor of this language family that we propose to call the “Kx’a family”. 1 Introduction 1.1 e Kx’a languages 1.2 Earlier work 1.3 e present study 2 Phonological reconstruction 2.1 Introduction 2.2 Vowels 2.2.1 Oral vowels 2.2.2 Vowel combinations 2.2.3 Vowels separated by a consonant Keywords: Click Type, Comparative Method, Genetic Relationship, Khoisan, !Xun 1) e present was written while the fi rst-named author spent a year at the Research Institute for Languages and Cultures of Asia and Africa of the Tokyo University of Foreign Studies. is author wishes to thank the Institute for its support, but most of all to Professor Osamu Hieda, who assisted us in multiple ways in carrying out this work.
    [Show full text]
  • The Diachrony of Initial Consonant Loss in Cape York Peninsula (Australia)
    The diachrony of initial consonant loss in Cape York Peninsula (Australia) Jean-Christophe Verstraete (University of Leuven) This paper revisits the diachrony of initial consonant loss, a type of sound change that is found in several areas in Australia (Hale 1976a, Alpher 1976, Blevins 2001), but is rare from a world-wide perspective (Blevins 2007). So far, the literature has mainly analysed initial loss as the outcome of a gradual process of initial weaking, caused by a shift of stress away from the initial syllable (Alpher 1976, Blevins & Marmion 1994). In this paper, I use data from a set of eight Paman (Pama-Nyungan) languages of Cape York Peninsula (Australia), which illustrate not just loss of initial consonants, but also initial consonant lenition and the loss of entire initial syllables. Using these data, I argue that (i) the classic model of gradual initial weakening needs to be supplemented with more abrupt mechanisms, specifically analogy-driven loss based on synchronic alternations, and contact-induced loss, and (ii) the causal link with stress shift needs to be refined, and in some languages loss of initial consonants in part of the lexicon may itself cause changes in the stress system. Cape York Peninsula, in Australia’s northeast, has several ‘hotspots’ of initial loss (Alpher 1976, Sutton 1976), e.g. in the north and on the central east coast. This paper focuses on the eastern hotspot in the Princess Charlotte Bay area, specifically eight languages from three different subgroups of Paman, viz. Middle Paman (Umpithamu, Yintyingka, Umpila), Lamalamic (Lamalama, Umbuygamu, Rimanggudinhma) and Thaypanic (Kuku Thaypan, Aghu Tharrnggala).
    [Show full text]