The Politicization of Natural Disasters in the US and Oman
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
University of Massachusetts Amherst ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst Doctoral Dissertations Dissertations and Theses April 2021 Cyclones, Spectacles, and Citizenship: The Politicization of Natural Disasters in the US and Oman Tyler Schuenemann University of Massachusetts Amherst Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/dissertations_2 Part of the American Politics Commons, Comparative Politics Commons, Environmental Studies Commons, Political Theory Commons, and the Social and Cultural Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation Schuenemann, Tyler, "Cyclones, Spectacles, and Citizenship: The Politicization of Natural Disasters in the US and Oman" (2021). Doctoral Dissertations. 2138. https://doi.org/10.7275/20155937 https://scholarworks.umass.edu/dissertations_2/2138 This Open Access Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Dissertations and Theses at ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CYCLONES, SPECTACLES, AND CITIZENSHIP: THE POLITICIZATION OF NATURAL DISASTERS IN THE US AND OMAN A Dissertation Presented By Tyler Schuenemann Submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Massachusetts Amherst in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY February 2021 Department of Political Science © Copyright by Tyler Schuenemann 2021 All Rights Reserved Cyclones, Spectacles, and Citizenship: The Politicization of Natural Disasters in the US and Oman A Dissertation Presented By Tyler Schuenemann Approved as to style and content by: ______________________________________ Amel Ahmed, Chair ______________________________________ Kevin Rozario, Member _______________________________________ Frederic C. Schaffer, Member ______________________________________ Jillian Schwedler, Member ______________________________________ Jesse Rhodes, Department Chair Department of Political Science ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS None of the research and writing that went into this dissertation would have been possible without the support and love of my parents, Dave and Denise, and my sister Keah. I feel lucky to have them. I am grateful to have had a number of official and unofficial guides on the dissertation path. Amel Ahmed’s care, insight, and encouragement has been pivotal to seeing this project to fruition. Fred Schaffer and Nick Xenos have been involved since the beginning of the project. They each encouraged me to look at the world in new ways and to stray from well-trodden paths of research. Jillian Schwedler and Kevin Rozario were very generous in providing invaluable insights on the many drafts that I sent their way. To Amel, Fred, Nick, Jillian, and Kevin, thank you for your kindness and support throughout the years. A number of other faculty have provided me intellectual, emotional, and professional guidance along the way. Thank you to Roberto Alejandro, Sonia Alvarez, Ivan Ascher, Angelica Bernal, Butterfield, Charli Carpenter, Barbara Cruikshank, Adam Dahl, Yasmeen Daifallah, Cyril Ghosh, Ron Glass, Peter Haas, Jess Hollenbeck, Eric Kraemer, Kenn Mally, David Miller, Timothy Pachirat, MJ Peterson, Everita Silina, and Regine Spector. There are several professors that have passed away before I got the chance to thank them for their support. They are Lily Ling, Don LaCoss, Stephen Clarkson, and Jeff Juris. I received generous financial support for my research through the Fulbright Program and the University of Massachusetts Amherst Graduate School. I would also like to recognize the support that I received from the Critical Language Scholarship iv program, which funded two summers of Arabic language study abroad, including a summer in Nizwa, Oman that allowed me to begin the preliminary stages of my research. The faculty and participants at the Institute for Qualitative and Multi-Method provided insights into the early planning of the project. The kind folks at Tawasul hosted me during the initial stages of my research in Oman. The Omani Study Center of Sultan Qaboos University kindly provided access to their archives. Dola Algady was a wonderful tutor. Noora al Balushi was the best research assistant I could have hoped for, and will be eternally grateful to her. Thank you to my brilliant Omani interlocutors who will remain anonymous. Their insights and guidance greatly improved this project. While fieldwork and writing can get lonely and trying, I have had a number of friends and colleagues help me through it along the way. I would not have been able to finish this project without their help and friendship. Big hugs to Yuna Blajer de la Garza, Ryan Butler, Robert Darrow, Samantha Davis, Kristen and Steve Dew, Mohammed Elghoul, Usmaan Masood Farooqui, Sam Fayyaz, Sofia Fenner, Amanda Giorgio, James Heilman, Andres Fabian Henao, Kevin Henderson, Mohsen Jalali, Colleen and Zach Kimes, Andrew Leber, Ben Leiter, Travis Melin, Elva Orozco Mendoza, Benjamin Nolan, Alix Olson, Ana Maria Ospina Pedraza, Ardeshir Pezeshk, Luz Maria Sanchez Duque, Elif Savas, Christopher Schafenacker, Dan Schmitz, Mike Stein, Candice Travis, Josh and Kayla Tueting, Ethan Tupelo, Susanne M. Westerhoff-Uprety, Alper Yağcı, and Basileus Zeno. Marissa Hulett deserves her own sentence because she taught me how to write. Jenna Ciotta gets three. She tolerated my demanding writing schedule with grace, and filled my time away from the project with love and joy. For that I will be eternally grateful. v ABSTRACT CYCLONES, SPECTACLES, AND CITIZENSHIP: THE POLITICIZATION OF NATURAL DISASTERS IN THE US AND OMAN FEBRUARY 2021 TYLER SCHUENEMANN B.A., UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-LA CROSSE M.A., UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO Ph.D., UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST Directed by: Professor Amel Ahmed In the face of such complex, urgent threats of fires, floods, and increasingly powerful storms, many scholars warn that climate change puts us on the path to a technocratic, “rule of experts” for the sake of survival. Others warn that climate change will actually undermine the authority of governments, as they become increasingly unable to meet the basic needs of their citizens. In this dissertation, I draw from interviews, archival research, and ethnographic observations in the US and Oman to examine how power and historical context shape the way that these societies politicize natural disasters. These two countries have fundamental differences in terms of their state-society relations. Yet responses to recent tropical cyclones demonstrate that each country manifests similar contention in the face of disaster. Contemporary Americans and Omanis treat large-scale natural disasters as unplanned spectacles of interdependence, attention-grabbing symbols of their nation’s fate in an emergency. Officials and dissidents alike are seizing upon the public’s attention to these symbols, competing to anchor them to their own agendas. For example, disasters are treated as “revelations” about the legitimacy of government authorities, or “lessons” about public values other than safety from disaster, such as social justice and religious piety. Such disaster-contention in the US and Oman is a relatively new phenomena. It emerged in the early- and mid-twentieth century by virtue of the spread of new communication technologies that made it possible to conceive of “national emergencies,” and by an expanded vision for government and civic responsibility, making such emergencies problems for the government to solve. I argue that this record of contention shows that disasters are not partisan to technocratic order, nor are they conveyor belts to chaos. As the most attention-grabbing manifestations of climate change are treated as spectacles of interdependence, they provide opportunities for political entrepreneurs of many stripes, including nationalist and democratic movements that deride the rule of experts. The political consequences of climate change are therefore contingent upon the historically constructed nature of interpretive frameworks, like “citizenship” and “national emergency,” and how officials and dissidents utilize them to give political meaning to calamity. vi TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ............................................................................................... iv ABSTRACT ....................................................................................................................... vi TABLE OF CONTENTS .................................................................................................. vii CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................1 Natural Disasters as Emergencies in Contention .....................................................3 An Interpretivist Approach to the Politics of Natural Disasters ..............................8 Research Design.....................................................................................................14 Summary of Argument ..........................................................................................22 2. HOW NATURAL DISASTERS BECAME UNPLANNED POLITICAL SPECTACLES IN THE US ...................................................................................35 Disasters as Local and National Events .................................................................38 National Emergencies with No National Scandals ................................................50 The Mississippi