DOCSLIB.ORG

2020 02 03 Diyala Governorate Profile V0

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2020 02 03 Diyala Governorate Profile V0 IRAQ Diyala Governorate profile and monthly humanitarian response January - December 2019 KEY FIGURES 279.2K 408.5K 37.0K People In Need People Targeted¹ People Reached² HRP 2019 M RETURNEES BY TYPE OF SHELTER IDPs BY TYPE OF SHELTER 0.23Returnees 1% 10%3% 89%96% 1% 13% 16% 70% 0 20 40 60 80 100 Habitual Host families Rent Habitual residence Rented houses residence Camp M (unhabitable) 0.05IDPs (habitable) Other shelter types³ PEOPLE REACHED BY DISTRICT REPORTING PARTNERS BY TYPE 4 OXFAM UNHCR 10 DoLSA Garmyan, Qandil 7 CDO, HAI, HI 5 DoLSA Garmyan 1 23 UNHCR OTHER UN NNGO INGO IOM CDO, DoLSA Garmyan, Qandil DRC CDO, IOM, UNICEF, WHO Kifri Baghdad, LCN, HI, DRC DoLSA Garmyan, SCI, TGH, DRC LCN, TGH, DRC CDO, HI, NPA, DRC, IOM, UNHCR LCN, Tajdeed YAO, IOM, UNHCR YAO UNHCR, IOM Khanaqin OXFAM, IOM Al-Khalis SCI, WEO, UNICEF OXFAM Al-Muqdadiya UIMS, IOM UNHCR WFP DRC Ba'quba NPA, LCN, IOM, UNHCR Emergency, HI, IOM BROB, LCN, TGH Baladruz DRC Tajdeed, LCN, UNHCR UNHCR HI, NPA, UNHCR, DRC,LCN SCI IOM People reached SCI, DRC HI, NPA - + DRC, UNHCR TIMELINE OF DISPLACEMENT AND RETURNS 0.22 0.22 0.23 0.21 0.22 0.20 0.20 0.17 Internally displaced people 0.16 (millions) 0.14 0.14 Returnees 0.10 (millions) 0.10 0.09 0.08 0.08 0.10 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.06 0.06 0.04 0.05 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 The boundaries and names shown and the designations used on this map do not imply official endorsement or acceptance by the United Nations. The data for this infographic has a limited number of sources. The data has not been independently verified and is subject to error or omission, deliberate or otherwise by the various sources. This infographic is strictly intended to inform humanitarian strategic and operational planning and humanitarian response. 1. The target population is the highest of all clusters. 2. People reached is calculated based on the highest number reached by a cluster achieving highest reach per governorate. 3. Unfinished buildings, informal shelters, schools and religious buildings. 4. Based on 2019 HRP response in the ActivityInfo platform. 5. *US$2,562,533 was provided to support projects under the Iraq Humanitarian Fund’s first 2019 Standard Allocation to seven partners, in two districts of Diyala Governorate. The IHF First Standard Allocation 2019 overall provided a total of $34 million to support most critical response gaps identified in the 2019 HRP. Creation date: 3 February 2020, Source: PiN, target, people reached, partners: Iraq Humanitarian Dashboard (December 2019), Camps: CCCM (December 2019); IDPs, returnees, trend: IOM DTM (December 2019) Feedback: [email protected], www.unocha.org/iraq IRAQ Diyala Governorate profile and monthly humanitarian response January - December 2019 PEOPLE REACHED BY CLUSTER (OVERALL RESPONSE) 408,457 People targeted People reached 83,518 72,348 58,803 37,001 32,214 24,553 16,925 19,221 18,197 20,621 23,179 14,087 3,981 8,921 8,060 2,270 13,740 6,742 4,338 3,492 3,090 CCCM CP EDUCATION FSC GBV GP MA HLP HEALTH MPCA SNFI WASH EL 1 7 3 1 6 9 7 1 4 2 2 # OF PARTNERS IRAQ HUMANITARIAN FUND IMPLEMENTATION* 5 2.56M FAO K 90.8People Targeted Qoratu SZOA Kifri ACTED Al-Wand 2 7 ACTED IHF PARTNERS Al-Wand 1 Khanaqin SI Al-Khalis FAO HI, DRC** Al-Muqdadiya Muskar Saad Camp WFP** Legend Camp Ba'quba Main road Baladruz Lake River Governorate boundary District boundary PEOPLE REACHED BY CLUSTER AND DISTRICT District CCCM CP Education EL FS GBV GP MA HLP Health MPCA SNFI WASH Al-Khalis - 36 - - - 1,245 8,536 284 - 4,862 1,874 Al-Muqdadiya - 3,361 1,492 - - - 3,359 412 - 931 2,060 Baladruz - - - - - - 296 543 - - - Ba'quba - 345 - - - 10,933 10,639 3,028 - 10 7,667 Khanaqin 3,981 11,545 7,429 2,316 2,270 7,578 13,428 2,475 2,556 1 5,236 2,486 Kifri - 3,934 - 1,176 - 865 743 - 1,782 2,140 - *Some projects here are consortium projects and the organization named, as the lead agency of the consortium, is not necessarily the implementer. **WFP and DRC projects are programming in several districts in Diyala governorate..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Iraq, August 2006
    Library of Congress – Federal Research Division Country Profile: Iraq, August 2006 COUNTRY PROFILE: IRAQ August 2006 COUNTRY Formal Name: Republic of Iraq (Al Jumhuriyah al Iraqiyah). Short Form: Iraq. Term for Citizen(s): Iraqi(s). Click to Enlarge Image Capital: Baghdad. Major Cities (in order of population size): Baghdad, Mosul (Al Mawsil), Basra (Al Basrah), Arbil (Irbil), Kirkuk, and Sulaymaniyah (As Sulaymaniyah). Independence: October 3, 1932, from the British administration established under a 1920 League of Nations mandate. Public Holidays: New Year’s Day (January 1) and the overthrow of Saddam Hussein (April 9) are celebrated on fixed dates, although the latter has lacked public support since its declaration by the interim government in 2003. The following Muslim religious holidays occur on variable dates according to the Islamic lunar calendar, which is 11 days shorter than the Gregorian calendar: Eid al Adha (Feast of the Sacrifice), Islamic New Year, Ashoura (the Shia observance of the martyrdom of Hussein), Mouloud (the birth of Muhammad), Leilat al Meiraj (the ascension of Muhammad), and Eid al Fitr (the end of Ramadan). Flag: The flag of Iraq consists of three equal horizontal bands of red (top), white, and black with three green, five-pointed stars centered in the white band. The phrase “Allahu Akbar” (“God Is Great”) also appears in Arabic script in the white band with the word Allahu to the left of the center star and the word Akbar to the right of that star. Click to Enlarge Image HISTORICAL BACKGROUND Early History: Contemporary Iraq occupies territory that historians regard as the site of the earliest civilizations of the Middle East.
    [Show full text]
  • “We Just Want Someone to Protect Us:” Civilian
    “ WE JUST WANT SOMEONE TO PROTECT US” Civilian Protection Challenges in Kirkuk 1 RECOGNIZE. PREVENT. PROTECT. AMEND. PROTECT. PREVENT. RECOGNIZE. Cover Civilians living amidst homes damaged T +1 202 558 6958 during fighting between ISIS and E [email protected] Peshmerga in a village in Kirkuk, 2016. civiliansinconflict.org Sahr Muhammedally/CIVIC December 2019 Report designed by Dena Verdesca. ABOUT CENTER FOR CIVILIANS IN CONFLICT Center for Civilians in Conflict (CIVIC) is an international organization dedicated to promoting the protection of civilians caught in conflict. CIVIC’s mission is to work with armed actors and civilians in conflict to develop and implement solutions to prevent, mitigate, and respond to civilian harm. Our vision is a world where parties to armed conflict recognize the dignity and rights of civilians, prevent civilian harm, protect civilians caught in conflict, and amend harm. CIVIC was established in 2003 by Marla Ruzicka, a young humanitarian who advocated on behalf of civilian war victims and their families in Iraq and Afghanistan. Building on her extraordinary legacy, CIVIC now operates in conflict zones throughout the Middle East, Africa, Europe, and South Asia to advance a higher standard of protection for civilians. At CIVIC, we believe that parties to armed conflict have a responsibility to prevent and address civilian harm. To accomplish this, we assess the causes of civilian harm in particular conflicts, craft practical solutions to address that harm, and advocate the adoption of new policies and practices that lead to the improved wellbeing of civilians caught in conflict. Recognizing the power of collaboration, we engage with civilians, governments, militaries, and international and regional institutions to identify and institutionalize strengthened protections for civilians in conflict.
    [Show full text]
  • Iraq's Sectarian and Ethnic Violence and the Evolving Insurgency
    F Center for Strategic and International Studies Arleigh A. Burke Chair in Strategy 1800 K Street, N.W. • Suite 400 • Washington, DC 20006 Phone: 1 (202) 775 -3270 • Fax: 1 (202) 457 -8746 Email: [email protected] Iraq’s Sectarian and Ethnic Violence and the Evolving Insurgency Developments through late -January 2007 Anthony H. Cordesman Arleigh A. Burke Chai r in Strategy [email protected] With the Assistance of Emma Davies Updated: January 26, 2007 Cordesman: Iraq’s Sectarian and Ethnic Violence 1/26/07 Page 2 Executive Summary The insurgency in Iraq has become a “war after the war” that threa tens to divide the country and create a full -scale civil conflict. It has triggered sectarian and ethnic violence that dominates the struggle to reshape Iraq as a modern state, has emerged as a growing threat to the Gulf region, and has become linked to th e broader struggle between Sunni and Shi’ite Islamist extremism, and moderation and reform, throughout the Islamic world. Since its inception in the spring of 2003, the nature of the fighting in Iraq has evolved from a struggle between Coalition forces and former regime loyalists to a much more diffuse conflict, involving a number of Sunni groups, Shi’ite militias, and foreign jihadists, and which has spread to become a widespread civil conflict. In the process, the complex patterns of conflict in Iraq ha ve become a broad struggle for sectarian and ethnic control of political and economic space. Open violence has become steadily more serious, but it is only part of the story.
    [Show full text]
  • Iraq IDP CRISIS Situation Report No
    Iraq IDP CRISIS Situation Report No. 5 (27 July – 1 August 2014) This report is produced by OCHA Iraq in collaboration with humanitarian partners. It covers the period from 27 July to 1 August. The next report will be issued on or around 7 August. Highlights • The UN calls for immediate, safe and unhindered humanitarian access to all Iraqis in need. • Families continue to move in search of safety, shelter and life-saving assistance. • Some IDPs moving to Kurdistan during the Eid holiday encountered delays at checkpoints . • A shortage of medical personnel is reported countrywide, preventing civilians’ access to health care. • Over 600 schools continue to be used as IDP shelters,and need to be freed to ensure students can resume learning activities in September. Source: GoI Ministry of Migration and Displacement, UNOCHA, UNHCR, IOM, Inter-Agency Assessments. The boundaries and names shown and the designations used on this map do not imply official endorsement or acceptance by the United Nations. 1.5million 1.2million 1million Affected people Internally displaced Targeted for (estimated) assistance Situation Overview The humanitarian situation continues to be extremely concerning, countrywide. Although the needs of displaced people remains a priority, host communities and people trapped in conflict-affected areas whose access to basic services, food and other commodities is curtailed are also in urgent need of humanitarian assistance. Free and unimpeded access to all in need across Iraq is a serious concern, particularly in the areas north of Baghdad and in the ‘central belt’ north and west of the capital. While some assistance is trickling in, IDPs and residents trapped in conflict zones are not receiving enough assistance.
    [Show full text]
  • Anbar, Baghdad & Diyala
    ANBAR, BAGHDAD & DIYALA GOVERNORATE PROFILES POST-FEBRUARY 2006 IDP NEEDS ASSESSMENTS DECEMBER 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section: Page: I. IOM Assessment Background 1 II. Overview 2 1. Area Background 2. Restrictions on IDP Entry or Registration Dahuk il rb E S 3. Ethnicity and Religion u la y a m 4. Places of origin ew in a N n iy 5. Reasons for displacement a h 6. Pre-2006 IDP population Kirkuk 7. IDP relations w/ host community S al ah 8. IDP Intentions a l- Di D n iy III. Emergency Assessment and Needs 7 a l 1. Security 7 a i. Security Baghdad W ii. Vulnerabilities Kerbala assit Babylon Q iii. Women and Children ad Anbar is si 2. Shelter and Basic Services 9 ya i. Shelter (living arrangements) Missan Thi-Qar ii. Food/PDS Najaf iii. Water and Sanitation Basrah iv. Fuel and Electricity Muthanna v. Health Care vi. Education 3. Legal 13 i. Property Issues ii. Documentation IV. Humanitarian Assistance Received 14 V. Priority Needs 14 1. Top Priority Needs 2. JOC Projects VI. Conclusion 16 I. POST-FEBRUARY 2006 IDP ASSESSMENTS: BACKGROUND Following the 22 February 2006 bombing of the Samarra Al-Askari Mosque, sectarian violence led to an alarming increase in population displacement within Iraq. In coordination with the Iraqi Ministry of Displacement and Migration (MoDM) and other entities, the International Organization for Migration (IOM) is conducting in-depth assessments on recently displaced persons throughout Iraq. IOM monitors use IDP Rapid Assessment questionnaires to gather information from MoDM, IDP tribal and community leaders, local NGOs, local government bodies, and individual IDP families.
    [Show full text]
  • Expanded Timeline and Historical Context
    by Howard Korder directed by David Warren Expanded Timeline and Historical Context Timeline/Historical Context The nation of Aqaat is a fictional amalgamation of areas in the Middle East but is based in the reality of turmoil there. Aqaat aligns most closely with Iraq’s history, although it is a fusion of places in the area. While the majority of people in the Middle East are Muslim, there are countless tribes, factions, and sects. This timeline details the actual conflicts in the Middle East during the span of the play. Ancient History The history of the area is rich and diverse. In ancient times, the area surrounding the Tigris and Euphrates rivers in Iraq was known as Mesopotamia or the Fertile Crescent. The earliest known civilizations in this area were the Sumerians in 3000 B.C. In the early eighth century, the Muslims established their first dynasty, the Umayyad, with their capital at Damascus in Syria. By 750 conflicts led to the ‘establishment of the Abbasid dynasty in Iraq, with its capital at Baghdad. The ‘Abbasid dynasty ruled from 750 to 1258, a period during which Arab-Muslim culture thrived. Many Greek and Roman philosophical and scientific works were translated into Arabic and at times were synthesized with Islamic values and concepts. The area was pillaged by the Mongols in 1258 and through the 18th century was the object of Turkish and Persian competition. Modern Times The Ottomans (Turks) ruled the area until World War I. Upon collapse of the Ottoman Empire, the British took over and decided to unite the three Ottoman provinces of Baghdad, Mosul, and Basra into one nation-state called Iraq (a name borrowed from the medieval past of the region) despite the significant religious, linguistic, ethnic, and tribal divisions running through Iraqi society.
    [Show full text]
  • Iraq and Its Regions Baghdad–Provincial Relations After Mosul and Kirkuk
    Middle East Centre IRAQ AND ITS REGIONS BAGHDAD–PROVINCIAL RELATIONS AFTER MOSUL AND KIRKUK Workshop Proceedings | March 2018 About the Middle East Centre The Middle East Centre builds on LSE’s long engagement with the Middle East and provides a central hub for the wide range of research on the region carried out at LSE. The Middle East Centre aims to enhance un- derstanding and develop rigorous research on the societies, economies, polities and interna- tional relations of the region. The Centre pro- motes both specialised knowledge and public understanding of this crucial area and has out- standing strengths in interdisciplinary research and in regional expertise. As one of the world’s leading social science institutions, LSE com- prises departments covering all branches of the social sciences. The Middle East Centre harnesses this expertise to promote innovative research and training on the region. Publications Editor Ribale Sleiman Haidar Editorial Assistant Jack McGinn Cover Image Liberation Monument in Baghdad, 18 May 2014. © Oras Al-Kubaisi | flickr.com/photos/orasik/ Middle East Centre IRAQ AND ITS REGIONS: BAGHDAD–PROVINCIAL RELATIONS AFTER MOSUL AND KIRKUK Workshop Convenor: Toby Dodge Rapporteur: Jack McGinn Workshop Proceedings March 2018 Middle East Centre London School of Economics Houghton Street London, WC2A 2AE @LSEMiddleEast @lsemiddleeastcentre lse.middleeast lse.ac.uk/mec The views and opinions expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent those of the London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE) or the Middle East Centre. This document is issued on the understanding that if any extract is used, the author(s) and the LSE Middle East Centre should be credited, with the date of the publication.
    [Show full text]
  • Life After ISIS-New Challenges to Christianity in Iraq
    Life after ISIS: New challenges to Christianity in Iraq Results from ACN’s survey of Christians in the liberated Nineveh Plains June 2020 Bischof-Kindermann-Str. 23, 61462 Königstein/Ts., GERMANY Tel. +49 (0)6174 291-0 E-mail: [email protected] || www.acninternational.org Life after ISIS: New challenges to Christianity in Iraq Results from ACN’s survey of Christians in the liberated Nineveh Plains June 2020 Aid to the Church in Need International (ACN) Who is ACN? Aid to the Church in Need (ACN), also known as Kirche in Not / Ostpriesterhilfe, is an international Catholic pastoral aid organization. It aims to help Christians in need wherever they are repressed or persecuted and therefore prevented from living according to their faith. Each year ACN funds over 6,000 projects in more than 150 countries around world, helping to support the Church in its mission, and bringing hope and solidarity to millions of people. Due to its global structure, Aid to the Church in Need can quickly identify needs and respond promptly with aid projects. This is enabled by an efficient framework that keeps bureaucracy to a minimum while thoroughly verifying and approving projects for our project partners. Aid to the Church in Need's General Secretariat and Project Headquarters is in Königstein, Germany. With 23 national offices ACN supports the work of priests, catechists, seminarians and sisters. Aid to the Church in Need’s mission are: • to advance the Christian religion by supporting and promoting the Church, especially in countries where Christians are suffering persecution or discrimination; • to further the other charitable work of the Church by providing practical assistance and pastoral care for persons in need, especially those who are living in, or are refugees from, such countries.
    [Show full text]
  • The US Army and the Battle for Baghdad: Lessons Learned
    C O R P O R A T I O N The U.S. Army and the Battle for Baghdad Lessons Learned—And Still to Be Learned David E. Johnson, Agnes Gereben Schaefer, Brenna Allen, Raphael S. Cohen, Gian Gentile, James Hoobler, Michael Schwille, Jerry M. Sollinger, Sean M. Zeigler For more information on this publication, visit www.rand.org/t/RR3076 Library of Congress Control Number: 2019940985 ISBN: 978-0-8330-9601-2 Published by the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif. © Copyright 2019 RAND Corporation R® is a registered trademark. Limited Print and Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions. The RAND Corporation is a research organization that develops solutions to public policy challenges to help make communities throughout the world safer and more secure, healthier and more prosperous. RAND is nonprofit, nonpartisan, and committed to the public interest. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. Support RAND Make a tax-deductible charitable contribution at www.rand.org/giving/contribute www.rand.org Preface This report documents research and analysis conducted as part of a project entitled Lessons Learned from 13 Years of Conflict: The Battle for Baghdad, 2003–2008, spon- sored by the Office of Quadrennial Defense Review, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • A Chronology of Significant International Terrorism for 2004
    National Counterterrorism Center A Chronology of Significant International Terrorism for 2004 29 April 2005 National Counterterrorism Center A Chronology of Significant International Terrorism for 2004 29 April 2005 A Chronology of Significant International Terrorism for 2004 Contents Forward v Methodology Utilized to Compile this Chronology of 2004 Terrorist Incidents vii Chronology of Significant International Terrorism, 2004 1 Statistics on Significant International Terrorism 79 Total Significant International Terrorist Attacks and Total Associated Dead 81 by Region, 2004 Total Victims of Significant International Terrorist Attacks, by Type of Victim 82 and Region, 2004 Methods Used in the 651 Significant International Terrorist Attacks 83 Involving Worldwide Victims, in 2004 Total Significant International Terrorist Attacks Involving a US Citizen 84 and/or US Facility, by Region, 2004 Methods Used in the 64 Significant International Terrorist Attacks 85 Involving a US Citizen and/or US Facility, 2004 Attacks Involving US Interests as a Share of Total Significant 86 International Terrorist Attacks, 2004 US Victims as a Share of All Victims Involved in Significant 87 International Terrorist Attacks, 2004 iii National Counterterrorism Center A Chronology of Significant International Terrorism for 2004 FORWARD The National Counterterrorism Center (NCTC) originally compiled this chronology of significant, international terrorist incidents in support of the Department of State’s publication “Patterns of Global Terrorism,” which was formerly used to fulfill the Department’s reporting responsibilities under Title 22 of the United States Code, Section 2656f(d). The Department has decided to submit a new report, “Country Reports on Terrorism,” in fulfillment of its reporting mandate. As the newly created “knowledge bank” of the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of Iran-Iraq Bilateral Border Treaties
    Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law Volume 24 Issue 1 Article 4 1992 Analysis of Iran-Iraq Bilateral Border Treaties Joseph J. Cusimano Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/jil Part of the International Law Commons Recommended Citation Joseph J. Cusimano, Analysis of Iran-Iraq Bilateral Border Treaties, 24 Case W. Res. J. Int'l L. 89 (1992) Available at: https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/jil/vol24/iss1/4 This Note is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Journals at Case Western Reserve University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law by an authorized administrator of Case Western Reserve University School of Law Scholarly Commons. An Analysis of Iran-Iraq Bilateral Border Treaties I. INTRODUCTION On September 22, 1980, Iraqi ground forces crossed the border into Iran, marking the official commencement of the Iran-Iraq war.' The war culminated a long history of tense relations between Iraq and Iran with the disputes traceable for thousands of years.2 Never before had past tensions escalated into the level of fierce fighting that would charac- terize the next eight years of war. One of the primary reasons for such long standing and successful armed conflict minimilization was the abil- ity of the two countries to reach agreements in the form of treaties.' Although many of these treaties were short-lived, the overall treaty rela- tions between the two countries provide an excellent opportunity to ex- amine the strength and weaknesses of bilateral treaties along with the dynamics involved with a commitment to treaty formulation.
    [Show full text]
  • DIYALA GOVERNORATE ASSESSMENT REPORT November 2006
    DIYALA GOVERNORATE ASSESSMENT REPORT Diyala 27 Al-Khalis 39 Al-Miqdadiyah 60 Ba’aqubah 64 Balad Ruz 77 Khanaqin 78 Kifri November 2006 This UNHCR Assessment Report is intended to provide objective information regarding the overall situation in the Governorate in question, detailing the situation faced by persons of concern and their communities. The report has been drafted by UNHCR with its partners, and many governmental and non-governmental organizations have been invited to contribute to this report which draws on international sources, reports of district authorities, UNHCR’s returnee monitoring activities and consultations with returnees and their communities. Efforts have been made to ensure that only accurate, reliable, factual material, independently confirmed information is reported. This Assessment Report is not intended to be a comprehensive human rights report, nor is the report an expression of political opinion or a statement of UNHCR policy. While the Assessment Report primarily targets displaced populations and returnees, information in Annexes I to III have been prepared in a format useful for donors and the Iraqi authorities. Therefore, the Assessment Report will be made available to a wide audience, including refugees abroad, IDPs and returnees and their communities, authorities, donors and other agencies. This report does not take into account events occurring on or after 30 November 2006, unless a later date is specified. UNHCR plans to update the report on a regular basis. Further information can be found on www.hcriraq.org
    [Show full text]