DOCSLIB.ORG

Project Title Project Sponsor FFY 2009 Costs Fed. FFY 2009 DVRPC

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Project Title Project Sponsor FFY 2009 Costs Fed. FFY 2009 DVRPC 01/26/2010 14:50 FFY 2009 DVRPC TIP Page 1 of 5 Rpt# TIP206 Public Transit FFY 2009 Costs FFY 2010 Costs FFY 2011 Costs FFY 2012 Costs Total Project Project Title Sponsor Fed. St. Federal State Local Total Fed. St. Federal State Local Total Fed. St. Federal State Local Total Fed. St Federal State Local Total 86712 Bucks County Transport Bucks 5310 435,200 108,800 544,000 544,000 County 86708 Child&Adult Disability Child&Adult 5310 96,000 24,000 120,000 120,000 disability and 86701 Comm Transit of Del Co Community 5310 144,000 36,000 180,000 180,000 Transit of 86713 County of Chester County of 5310 422,400 105,600 528,000 528,000 Chester 80951 Cruise Terminal Parking DRPA 5309 2,280,000 570,000 2,850,000 2,850,000 84470 Penn's Landing Ferry Syst DRPA 5309 5,600,000 1,400,000 7,000,000 7,000,000 88087 PATCO Station Improvement DRPA 5309 760,000 190,000 950,000 950,000 82860 Section 5310 Line Item DVRPC 5310 2,290,880 572,720 2,863,600 2,863,600 MPO Section 86702 Elwyn Elwyn 5310 72,000 18,000 90,000 90,000 86707 Human Services Inc. Human 5310 209,600 52,400 262,000 262,000 Services Inc. 86704 Paul Run Paul Run 5310 53,600 13,400 67,000 67,000 84473 Phila Zoo Intermodal Impr PHILA 5309 1,003,200 250,800 1,254,000 1,254,000 84665 Phila. Unemployment Proj PHILA 5309 CB 1,487,000 250,000 36,000 1,773,000 1,773,000 84665 Phila. Unemployment Proj PHILA 5316 286,000 286,000 286,000 86703 Program Employing People Program 5310 72,000 18,000 90,000 90,000 Employing 59935 Operating Assistance PUT 5307 CB 836,000 447,000 472,000 1,755,000 1,755,000 59935 Operating Assistance PUT 5316 41,000 41,000 41,000 59935 Operating Assistance PUT 5317 42,000 42,000 42,000 59935 Operating Assistance PUT ECONR 1,113,000 1,113,000 1,113,000 86699 Saint Mary Medical Center Saint Mary 5310 232,000 58,000 290,000 290,000 Medical 59966 Capital Asset Lease Prog SEPTA 339 3,302,000 114,000 3,416,000 3,416,000 59966 Capital Asset Lease Prog SEPTA 340 24,737,000 24,737,000 24,737,000 59966 Capital Asset Lease Prog SEPTA 339 4,031,000 139,000 4,170,000 4,170,000 59966 Capital Asset Lease Prog SEPTA 340 24,709,000 24,709,000 24,709,000 59966 Capital Asset Lease Prog SEPTA 339 24,127,000 832,000 24,959,000 24,959,000 59966 Capital Asset Lease Prog SEPTA 340 4,691,000 4,691,000 4,691,000 59966 Capital Asset Lease Prog SEPTA 339 24,894,000 858,000 25,752,000 25,752,000 59966 Capital Asset Lease Prog SEPTA 340 4,691,000 4,691,000 4,691,000 59973 Utility Fleet Renewal Pro SEPTA 5307 CB 2,800,000 583,000 117,000 3,500,000 3,500,000 59973 Utility Fleet Renewal Pro SEPTA 5307 CB 2,800,000 583,000 117,000 3,500,000 3,500,000 59973 Utility Fleet Renewal Pro SEPTA 5307 CB 2,800,000 583,000 117,000 3,500,000 3,500,000 59973 Utility Fleet Renewal Pro SEPTA 5307 CB 3,200,000 667,000 133,000 4,000,000 4,000,000 60255 Reg. Rail Signal Moderniz SEPTA 339 4,350,000 150,000 4,500,000 4,500,000 60255 Reg. Rail Signal Moderniz SEPTA 5309 339 4,000,000 22,934,000 957,000 27,891,000 27,891,000 60255 Reg. Rail Signal Moderniz SEPTA CB 833,000 833,000 833,000 60255 Reg. Rail Signal Moderniz SEPTA 5309 339 8,000,000 9,183,000 650,000 17,833,000 17,833,000 60255 Reg. Rail Signal Moderniz SEPTA CB 1,667,000 1,667,000 1,667,000 60255 Reg. Rail Signal Moderniz SEPTA 5309 339 5,200,000 10,150,000 567,000 15,917,000 15,917,000 60255 Reg. Rail Signal Moderniz SEPTA CB 1,083,000 1,083,000 1,083,000 60271 Station Accessibility Pro SEPTA 5309 CB 3,200,000 667,000 133,000 4,000,000 4,000,000 60271 Station Accessibility Pro SEPTA 5309 CB 2,400,000 500,000 100,000 3,000,000 3,000,000 60271 Station Accessibility Pro SEPTA 5309 CB 7,040,000 1,467,000 293,000 8,800,000 8,800,000 60271 Station Accessibility Pro SEPTA 5309 CB 7,240,000 1,508,000 302,000 9,050,000 9,050,000 60275 Debt Service SEPTA PTAF 31,578,000 1,089,000 32,667,000 32,667,000 01/26/2010 14:50 FFY 2009 DVRPC TIP Page 2 of 5 Rpt# TIP206 Public Transit FFY 2009 Costs FFY 2010 Costs FFY 2011 Costs FFY 2012 Costs Total Project Project Title Sponsor Fed. St. Federal State Local Total Fed. St. Federal State Local Total Fed. St. Federal State Local Total Fed. St Federal State Local Total 60275 Debt Service SEPTA PTAF 31,610,000 1,090,000 32,700,000 32,700,000 60275 Debt Service SEPTA 340 20,000,000 1,091,000 21,091,000 21,091,000 60275 Debt Service SEPTA PTAF 31,624,000 31,624,000 31,624,000 60275 Debt Service SEPTA 340 20,000,000 1,090,000 21,090,000 21,090,000 60275 Debt Service SEPTA PTAF 31,624,000 31,624,000 31,624,000 60281 Market St. Elevated Recon SEPTA 5307 CB 5,052,000 2,262,000 452,000 7,766,000 7,766,000 60281 Market St. Elevated Recon SEPTA 5309 5,810,000 5,810,000 5,810,000 60281 Market St. Elevated Recon SEPTA 5307 CB 6,960,000 4,167,000 833,000 11,960,000 11,960,000 60281 Market St. Elevated Recon SEPTA 5309 13,040,000 13,040,000 13,040,000 60286 Bus Purchase Program SEPTA 5307 CB 22,117,000 4,607,000 922,000 27,646,000 27,646,000 60286 Bus Purchase Program SEPTA 5308 3,000,000 3,000,000 3,000,000 60286 Bus Purchase Program SEPTA ECONR 20,548,000 20,548,000 20,548,000 60286 Bus Purchase Program SEPTA 5307 CB 29,157,000 6,074,000 1,215,000 36,446,000 36,446,000 60286 Bus Purchase Program SEPTA 5307 CB 29,858,000 6,220,000 1,244,000 37,322,000 37,322,000 60286 Bus Purchase Program SEPTA 5307 CB 36,698,000 7,645,000 1,528,000 45,871,000 45,871,000 60317 Federal Preventive Maint SEPTA 5307 32,200,000 18,050,000 50,250,000 50,250,000 60317 Federal Preventive Maint SEPTA 5309 40,000,000 40,000,000 40,000,000 60317 Federal Preventive Maint SEPTA 5307 32,200,000 16,800,000 49,000,000 49,000,000 60317 Federal Preventive Maint SEPTA 5309 35,000,000 35,000,000 35,000,000 60317 Federal Preventive Maint SEPTA 5307 32,200,000 13,050,000 45,250,000 45,250,000 60317 Federal Preventive Maint SEPTA 5309 20,000,000 20,000,000 20,000,000 60317 Federal Preventive Maint SEPTA 5307 32,200,000 8,050,000 40,250,000 40,250,000 60335 City Hall Station SEPTA 5309 CB 3,200,000 667,000 133,000 4,000,000 4,000,000 60335 City Hall Station SEPTA 5309 CB 16,000,000 3,333,000 667,000 20,000,000 20,000,000 60335 City Hall Station SEPTA 5309 CB 16,000,000 3,333,000 667,000 20,000,000 20,000,000 60540 Parking Expansion Program SEPTA 339 483,000 17,000 500,000 500,000 60540 Parking Expansion Program SEPTA 339 483,000 17,000 500,000 500,000 60540 Parking Expansion Program SEPTA 339 2,418,000 83,000 2,501,000 2,501,000 60540 Parking Expansion Program SEPTA 5309 339 226,000 483,000 27,000 736,000 736,000 60540 Parking Expansion Program SEPTA CB 47,000 47,000 47,000 60540 Parking Expansion Program SEPTA ECONR 1,690,000 1,690,000 1,690,000 60555 Broad St. Subway Station SEPTA 5309 CB 800,000 33,000 167,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 60555 Broad St. Subway Station SEPTA ECONR 30,034,000 30,034,000 30,034,000 60555 Broad St. Subway Station SEPTA 5309 CB 11,200,000 2,333,000 467,000 14,000,000 14,000,000 60555 Broad St. Subway Station SEPTA 5309 CB 8,000,000 1,667,000 333,000 10,000,000 10,000,000 60555 Broad St. Subway Station SEPTA 5309 CB 5,200,000 1,083,000 217,000 6,500,000 6,500,000 60557 Strategic Business Plan SEPTA 339 5,800,000 200,000 6,000,000 6,000,000 60557 Strategic Business Plan SEPTA 339 5,800,000 200,000 6,000,000 6,000,000 60557 Strategic Business Plan SEPTA 339 5,800,000 200,000 6,000,000 6,000,000 60557 Strategic Business Plan SEPTA ECONR 339 16,889,000 3,159,000 107,000 20,155,000 20,155,000 60574 Paoli Transport. Center SEPTA 5309 CB 6,602,000 1,376,000 275,000 8,253,000 8,253,000 60582 Vehicle Overhaul Program SEPTA 339 29,242,000 1,008,000 30,250,000 30,250,000 60582 Vehicle Overhaul Program SEPTA CB 21,750,000 21,750,000 21,750,000 60582 Vehicle Overhaul Program SEPTA 339 32,480,000 1,120,000 33,600,000 33,600,000 01/26/2010 14:50 FFY 2009 DVRPC TIP Page 3 of 5 Rpt# TIP206 Public Transit FFY 2009 Costs FFY 2010 Costs FFY 2011 Costs FFY 2012 Costs Total Project Project Title Sponsor Fed.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Public Transportation Highlights
    PENNSYLVANIA Public Transportation Public Transportation Highlights November 2013 Pennsylvania Public Transportation Ridership 500 10 434,248,701 440,208,599 422,618,782 8,144,628 8,162,647 8,047,117 400 8 300 6 200 4 passengers (in millions) passengers (in millions) 100 2 0 0 FY 2009-10 FY 2010-11 FY 2011-12 FY 2009-10 FY 2010-11 FY 2011-12 Number of Fixed Route Trips by Year Number of Shared-Ride Trips by Year 1,500 1,392,561 1,337,543 1,277,075 1,200 900 600 passengers (in thousands) 300 0 FY 2009-10 FY 2010-11 FY 2011-12 Number of Keystone Corridor Trips by Year 1 Public Transportation Highlights November 2013 Improving Public Transportation Performance Seven transit agency performance reviews completed between May 2012 and April 2013 VCTO DuFAST Mid County BCTA Performance reviews mandated by AMTRAN CamTran Act 44 of 2007 PART Performance reviews highlight issues and result in action plans with concrete goals and objectives to improve performance. Conduct Performance Review (every ve years) Transit System Identify DuFast performance Implements Opportunities Action Plan and for Improvement review completed in April Reports Quarterly ous Impro and 2013 (DuBois, Falls Creek, to Board and u ve Best Practices tin m PennDOT n e Sandy Township Joint o n 16 performance C t reviews completed Transportation Authority) PennDOT Oers since 2010 T e Technical r l a Establish c n Assistance to y 5-Year s C Implement Plan it Performance P w e ie Targets rfo ev rmance R Board and PennDOT Develop Reports are available Approve Action Plan at www.dot.state.pa.us Action Plan in the “Information and Reports” section of the Public Transportation 2 page.
    [Show full text]
  • Atglen Station Concept Plan
    Atglen Station Concept Plan PREPARED FOR: PREPARED BY: Chester County Planning Commission Urban Engineers, Inc. June 2012 601 Westtown Road, Suite 270 530 Walnut Street, 14th Floor ® Chester County Planning Commission West Chester, PA 19380 Philadelphia, PA 19106 Acknowledgements This plan was prepared as a collaboration between the Chester County Planning Commission and Urban Engineers, Inc. Support in developing the plan was provided by an active group of stakeholders. The Project Team would like to thank the following members of the Steering Advisory and Technical Review Committees for their contributions to the Atglen Station Concept Plan: Marilyn Jamison Amtrak Ken Hanson Amtrak Stan Slater Amtrak Gail Murphy Atglen Borough Larry Lavenberg Atglen Borough Joseph Hacker DVRPC Bob Garrett PennDOT Byron Comati SEPTA Harry Garforth SEPTA Bob Lund SEPTA Barry Edwards West Sadsbury Township Frank Haas West Sadsbury Township 2 - Acknowledgements June 2012 Atglen Station Concept Plan Table of Contents Introduction 5 1. History & Background 6 2. Study Area Profi le 14 3. Station Site Profi le 26 4. Ridership & Parking Analysis 36 5. Rail Operations Analysis 38 6. Station Concept Plan 44 7. Preliminary Cost Estimates 52 Appendix A: Traffi c Count Data 54 Appendix B: Ridership Methodology 56 Chester County Planning Commission June 2012 Table of Contents - 3 4 - Introduction June 2012 Atglen Station Concept Plan Introduction The planning, design, and construction of a new passenger rail station in Atglen Borough, Chester County is one part of an initiative to extend SEPTA commuter service on the Paoli-Thorndale line approximately 12 miles west of its current terminus in Thorndale, Caln Township.
    [Show full text]
  • Penndot Transit Projects
    DVRPC FY2021-2024 TIP for PA Final Version Pennsylvania - Transit Program (Status: TIP) PennDOT MPMS# 87534 Coatesville Train Station SR:0030 Return LIMITS: North Third Avenue and Fleetwood Street No Let Date IMPROVEMENT Transit Improvements NHPP: MRPID:AF MUNICIPALITIES: Coatesville City FC: AQ Code:2035M PLAN CENTER: IPD: PROJECT MANAGER: Steve Panko CMP: This project will include design and construction of a new ADA accessible train station approximately 300 feet east of the current station with approximately 100 to 150 parking spaces. The new station will include improved lighting, level-boarding platforms, overhead canopy, elevators, a passenger connection for crossing the tracks, and track re-alignment. These station improvements, provided by the Statewide Keystone Corridor Line Item, will move the Keystone Corridor towards full ADA accessibility, and provide an improved environment to foster increased ridership. The Coatesville Station located in Chester County is a component of the Keystone Corridor rail service between Philadelphia and Harrisburg. There are approximately seven Amtrak stops per day at the Coatesville Station. The Keystone line has multiple tracks, full electrification, and almost complete grade separation from the highway grid. Speed on the line is now up to 110 mph. This is a Keystone Corridor project totaling approximately $65 million and is funded with federal Keystone Corridor funds provided by FTA which will be reflected in TIPs of three different UZA areas: DVRPC ($9,759,000), Harrisburg Area Transportation Study ($12,671,000), and Lancaster MPO ($20,884,000). $21,237,000 has already been placed into a grant. TIP Program Years ($ 000) Phase Fund FY2021 FY2022 FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 FY2030 FY2031 FY2032 CON337 (PennDO 4,172 CON 5307-S 3,635 CON 1516 1,952 9,759 0 0 0 00 0 0 00 0 0 Total FY2021-2024 9,759 Total FY2025-2028 0 Total FY2029-2032 0 Total For 2021 2022 2023 2024 2021-2024 2025-2028 2029-2032 PennDOT $9,759 $0 $0 $0 $9,759 $0 $0 7/27/2021 Page 287.
    [Show full text]
  • DVRPC FY 2009 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP)
    The Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission is dedicated to uniting the re- gion’s elected officials, planning professionals and the public with a common vision of making a great region even greater. Shaping the way we live, work and play, DVRPC builds consensus on improving transportation, promoting smart growth, protecting the environment and enhancing the economy. We serve a diverse region of nine counties: Bucks, Chester, Delaware, Montgomery and Philadelphia in Pennsylvania; and Bur- lington, Camden, Gloucester and Mercer in New Jersey. DVRPC is the federally desig- nated Metropolitan Planning Organization for the Greater Philadelphia Region - leading the way to a better future. Our logo is adapted from the official DVRPC seal, and is designed as a stylized image of the Delaware Valley. The outer ring symbolizes the region as a whole, while the diagonal bar signifies the Delaware River. The two adjoining crescents represent the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and the State of New Jersey. DVRPC is funded by a variety of funding sources including federal grants from the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and Federal Transit Administration (FTA), the Pennsylvania and New Jersey departments of trans- portation, as well as by DVRPC’s state and local member governments. The authors, however, are solely responsible for its findings and conclusions, which may not repre- sent the official views or policies of the funding agencies. DVRPC Fiscal Year 2009 Transportation Improvement Program Volume IV
    [Show full text]
  • RAILROAD COMMUNICATIONS Amtrak
    RAILROAD COMMUNICATIONS Amtrak Amtrak Police Department (APD) Frequency Plan Freq Input Chan Use Tone 161.295 R (160.365) A Amtrak Police Dispatch 88.5 161.295 R (160.365) B Amtrak Police Dispatch 100.0 161.295 R (160.365) C Amtrak Police Dispatch 114.8 161.295 R (160.365) D Amtrak Police Dispatch 131.8 161.295 R (160.365) E Amtrak Police Dispatch 156.7 161.295 R (160.365) F Amtrak Police Dispatch 94.8 161.295 R (160.365) G Amtrak Police Dispatch 192.8 161.295 R (160.365) H Amtrak Police Dispatch 107.2 161.205 (simplex) Amtrak Police Car-to-Car Primary 146.2 160.815 (simplex) Amtrak Police Car-to-Car Secondary 146.2 160.830 R (160.215) Amtrak Police CID 123.0 173.375 Amtrak Police On-Train Use 203.5 Amtrak Police Area Repeater Locations Chan Location A Wilmington, DE B Morrisville, PA (and Trenton Station) C Philadelphia, PA D Gap, PA E Paoli, PA H Race Amtrak Police 10-Codes 10-0 Emergency Broadcast 10-21 Call By Telephone 10-1 Receiving Poorly 10-22 Disregard 10-2 Receiving Well 10-24 Alarm 10-3 Priority Service 10-26 Prepare to Copy 10-4 Affirmative 10-33 Does Not Conform to Regulation 10-5 Repeat Message 10-36 Time Check 10-6 Busy 10-41 Begin Tour of Duty 10-7 Out Of Service 10-45 Accident 10-8 Back In Service 10-47 Train Protection 10-10 Vehicle/Person Check 10-48 Vandalism 10-11 Request Additional APD Units 10-49 Passenger/Patron Assist 10-12 Request Supervisor 10-50 Disorderly 10-13 Request Local Jurisdiction Police 10-77 Estimated Time of Arrival 10-14 Request Ambulance or Rescue Squad 10-82 Hostage 10-15 Request Fire Department
    [Show full text]
  • 2011 Twelve Year Transportation Program
    2011 TWELVE YEAR TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM Adopted by the STATE TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION May 19, 2011 TWELVE YEAR TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM SINGLE-LINE LISTING DEFINITIONS The following is an explanation of the various codes used in the single-line computerized printout of the Twelve Year Transportation Program. The items in the heading are explained below. The column definitions proceed from left to right, top to bottom. SECTION HEADING This groups the projects by location under the regional metropolitan planning organizations or rural planning areas. Statewide and interstate projects are grouped at the end of the report. (See Table of Contents for order). COUNTY Groups the projects by county. MODE Identifies the project mode in the following order: Highways Bridges Airport Transit Rail PAGE HEADING and PROJECT DETAILS Consists of the following items: MPMS# The project identification number used in the current project inventory system. SR The State Route Number shows the route on which the project is located. The State Route System was implemented in late 1986, replacing the Legislative Route numbering system. Local roads are coded 9900 or 9911. TITLE /SPONSOR A brief name given to the project, often referred to as the project's "short title" or the Transit Entity sponsoring the project. The municipality where the project is located may be included. PERIOD Denotes the time period in which the project is to be implemented: 1 - First Four Years - October 2010 – September 2014 2 - Second Four Years - October 2014 – September 2018 3 - Third Four Years - October 2018 – September 2022 COSTS Consists of the following eight items: Study The cost associated with projects that are studies or research projects.
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation Priority Projects in Chester County Status – January 2021
    Transportation Priority Projects in Chester County Status – January 2021 Highway & Trail Projects Project Scope Cost Current Status/Phase Anticipated (millions) Construction US 202 at PA 926 Intersection improvements 3.6 Preliminary Engineering Fall 2022 US 202 Section 100 Operational improvements TBD Seeking Funding TBD Darby Road Extension: North Valley Replacement and relocation of 24.5 ROW / Utility 2022-2025 Road over Amtrak Bridge Valley Road bridge US 1: MD/PA Line to PA 472 Reconstruction 41.6 Preliminary Engineering 2026-2028 US 1: PA 472 to PA 896 Reconstruction 54.4 Preliminary Engineering / ROW 2023-2024 US 1: PA 896 to PA 41 Reconstruction 75.6 Preliminary Engineering 2026-2027 US 1: PA 41 to School House Road Reconstruction 82.5 Preliminary Engineering 2021-2023 PA Turnpike: Valley Forge Interchange Widening to six lanes 125.0 Final Design 2022-2024 to Valley Forge Road PA Turnpike: Valley Forge Road to PA Widening to six lanes 245.0 Final Design TBD 29 PA Turnpike: PA 29 to Downingtown Widening to six lanes 200.0 Final Design 2023-2027 PA Turnpike: Downingtown to Widening to six lanes 350.0 Preliminary Engineering 2024-2030 Morgantown PA 41 at SR 926 Improvements Roundabout 2.3 Preliminary Engineering 2021-2023 PA 41 at PA 841 Improvements Roundabout 5.5 Preliminary Engineering 2022-2023 PA 41 at State Road Improvements Intersection improvements 6.8 Final Design / ROW / Utility 2022-2024 PA 896 Corridor Safety Improvements Land and shoulder widening; 7.1 Final Design 2022-2023 installation of left turn lanes; roundabout at PA 841, et al PA 10 Safety Improvements Shoulder widening 0.2 Preliminary Engineering End of 2022 Schuylkill River Trail Completion of multi-use trail 9.0 Construction Complete by end from Linfield Road to 422 EB of 2021 ramp at PA 724.
    [Show full text]
  • NEC Capital Investment Plan
    Northeast Corridor Capital Investment Plan Fiscal Years 2020-2024 March 2019 (amended July 2020) Congress established the Northeast Corridor Commission to develop coordinated strategies for improving the Northeast’s core rail network in recognition of the inherent challenges of planning, financing, and implementing major infrastructure improvements that cross multiple jurisdictions. The expectation is that by coming together to take collective responsibility for the NEC, these disparate stakeholders will achieve a level of success that far exceeds the potential reach of any individual organization. The Commission is governed by a board comprised of one member from each of the NEC states (Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Connecticut, New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Delaware, and Maryland) and the District of Columbia; four members from Amtrak; and five members from the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT). The Commission also includes non- voting representatives from freight railroads, states with connecting corridors and several commuter operators in the Region. Contents Letter from the Co-Chair 1 Executive Summary 2 1. Introduction 5 2. FY20-24 Capital Investment Plan 7 Project Information Appendix 19 A. Capital Renewal of Basic Infrastructure 20 Figure A-1. Amtrak FY20-24 Baseline Capital Charge Program 22 Figure A-2. Metro-North Railroad FY20-24 Baseline Capital Charge Program 23 Figure A-3. Connecticut DOT FY20-24 Baseline Capital Charge Program 24 Figure A-4. MBTA FY20-24 Baseline Capital Charge Program 26 B. Special Projects 28 Figure B-1. Summary of special project funding requirements 29 Figure B-2. Special project listing by coordinating agency 34 Figure B-3. Amended special projects by coordinating agency1 145 1 On December 9, 2019, the Commission amended select project pages in the FY20-24 Capital Investment Plan to ensure alignment with applications to be submitted for the Federal-State Partnership for State of Good Repair Grant Program.
    [Show full text]
  • TYP One Line Listing
    Date: 06/01/2012 03:08 PM 2011 - 2022 Twelve Year Program Page 1 of 234 Rpt# TYP210 Cost ($000) Project Route Title/Sponsor Improvement Period Study PE FD UTL ROW CON PRA Total Planning Partner: Adams Mode: Highway County: Adams 880232011-2014 Bond Reserve Reserve Line Item First 1,080 1,080 880232011-2014 Bond Reserve Reserve Line Item Second 1,789 1,789 880232011-2014 Bond Reserve Reserve Line Item Third 1,073 1,073 70188ACTA - Operations Public Transit First 520 520 88019Adams HRST Line Item Reserve Line Item First 2,891 2,891 88086App 916 Reserve Reserve Line Item First 271 271 88086App 916 Reserve Reserve Line Item Second 4,136 4,136 88086App 916 Reserve Reserve Line Item Third 4,375 4,375 77501Brickyard Road Crossing Rail Highway Grade Crossing First 200 200 87792Bridge Reserve Reserve Line Item First 8,074 8,074 87792Bridge Reserve Reserve Line Item Second 4,147 4,147 87792Bridge Reserve Reserve Line Item Third 19,283 19,283 92377Center Square Master Plan PA Community Transportation Initiative First 75 75 87794CMAQ Line Item Reserve Line Item First 2,526 2,526 87794CMAQ Line Item Reserve Line Item Second 4,251 4,251 87794CMAQ Line Item Reserve Line Item Third 4,994 4,994 87807Delivery / Consult Assist Reserve Line Item First 420 280 700 92301Dist AWPM SFY 2010-2011 Safety Improvement First 356 356 87809ENH Line Item Reserve Line Item First 286 286 87809ENH Line Item Reserve Line Item Second 911 911 87809ENH Line Item Reserve Line Item Third 1,066 1,066 90071Gettysbrg/Hbg Express Svc Congestion Reduction First 264 264 87793Highway
    [Show full text]
  • Delaware Canal State Park
    ǭȱ іљђȱ юџјђџȱ џюіљѕђюёȱѐѐђѠѠȱ юћёȱ џюіљȱ ќѤћѠ ȱȱǭȱ 59 39 31 29 25 ȱǭȱȱȱ ȱ ȱ ȱȱǯȱ New Hope S e SHOPPING cond S Main St 9 miles to Rosemont ȱȱȱ Town of New Hope D Uhlerstown St 611 Northampton St e Bull Lockatong Creek l ȱȱȱȱ www.dcnr.state.pa.us As a destination for artists, musicians, writers and others Island Raven a Quarry Rd Rock Rd w Ĝȱ ȱȱ ȱȱȱ seeking a respite from daily life, New Hope provides a ȱ DISTRICT Pine St a R iv r e ȱȱȱ ȱȱ www.fodc.org ȱ¢ǯȱȱȱȱȱęȱȱ Easton ScoĴ e r R ȱȱ ȱǭȱ treasures, delectable meals and refreshing drinks in the shops, Park R d Ferry St Si i 32 29 D&R Trail Stockton tg v D ȱȱȱȱ ȱ ȱ ǯĴǯ restaurants and pubs along Main Street and tucked into side e e l a 29 rea Rd w a r e R Prallsville Easton r ll i v e r Hi ȱȱ ȱȱȱ¢ streets and alleys. As evening sets in, music pours into the ȱ ve en D& re Lumberville L Trail s S G Th 20 miles to Rd Rd Hendrick ȱȱȱ¢ www.septa.org streets, the curtain goes up at the iconic Bucks County Larry Holmes Dr ge xson Prallsville t a D ir Sugan Rd a P Uhlerstown it e Island d S m Mills Ar l . ȱȱȱ Playhouse, and energy surges through the town. Dam Ca N Main St t na ail l Sta ȱ ȱȱȱ ȱ ǯ ǯ Tr te L Del.
    [Show full text]
  • 2010 Amendments
    BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MONTGOMERY COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA August 18, 2010 10-C.295 ADOPTING AMENDMENTS TO THE COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PENNSYLVANIA MUNICIPALITIES PLANNING CODE On motion of Mr. Hoeffel, seconded by Mr. Castor, it was unanimously adopted that WHEREAS, the Montgomery County Planning Commission prepared the current comprehen- sive plan for the county, which was adopted by the Board of County Commissioners in 2005, and the Planning Commission has the duty of preparing amendments to the comprehensive plan for Montgomery County; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has prepared minor amendments to the county com- prehensive plan in accordance with Sections 209.1 and 301 of the Pennsylvania Municipalities Planning Code, with a more significant update expected in 2015; and WHEREAS, the plan consists of eight volumes, with five volumes being amended, including the Vision Plan, the Community Facilities Plan, the Land Use Plan, the Transportation Plan, and the Water Resources Plan; and WHEREAS, as part of the preparation of these comprehensive plan amendments, the Planning Commission held a public meeting to solicit public comments on the amendments; met with municipalities for the same purpose; sent the draft plans to all municipalities and school districts within the county as well as all abutting counties, municipalities, and school districts; and considered the comments received and incorporated appropriate revisions into the plans; and, WHEREAS, by resolution dated June 9, 2010, the Planning Commission
    [Show full text]
  • Improving Chester County's Five Train Stations
    Improving Chester County’s Five Train Stations October 17, 2014 Jennie Granger, AICP Bureau of Aviation, Director Pennsylvania Department of Transportation The Keystone Corridor • 14 daily weekday and 8 • 104 Mile Corridor weekend round trips • 12 Stations • On time performance > 90% • 1.46 M Passengers in FY13 • Top 10 fastest growing corridors PennDOT Goals • Improve the passenger experience to: – Increase Ridership – Decrease travel time – Create modern, attractive, and safe stations – Build a strong transit culture • Return to a state of good repair Stakeholder Roles • Amtrak – Owns and operates corridor • SEPTA – Operates on portion • Norfolk Southern – Operates on portion • PennDOT – Responsible for operations & maintenance –Passenger Rail Investment and Improvement Act of 2008 (PRIIA) – Receives grants for capital improvements Project Funding • FTA Commuter Rail Formula Funding – Stations – Amenities • FRA High Speed Intercity Passenger Rail Program (HSIPR) • All Funding Requires State Match – Act 89 helped solidify continued success Current Infrastructure Projects Grade Crossings Eliminations • $20 million to close 3 remaining public at-grade crossings • Projects are expected to be completed by the end of 2015 • Will increase safety and facilitate higher speeds Interlockings and ABS • $40 million to design and reconstruct State Interlocking in Harrisburg • $7 million to perform preliminary engineering for interlockings throughout the corridor • $1.5 million to perform preliminary engineering for Automatic Block Signaling PennDOT
    [Show full text]