DOCSLIB.ORG

Ecological Assessment Report V2

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ecological Assessment Report V2 ECOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT REPORT V2 LOT 9 ON SP197677 204 NEILL ROAD MOOLOOLAH VALLEY FOR DAVID & CAROLYN SARGEANT SEPTEMBER 2015 Tel/Fax (07) 54505984 / PO Box 803 Coolum Beach QLD 4573 / Email: [email protected] ABN 44 851 168 122 Ecological Assessment Report v2 NCES REF: SAR2015-04 EAR Lot 9 SP197677– 204 Neill Road, Mooloolah Valley DOCUMENT CONTROL Ecological Assessment Report Client: David & Carolyn Sargeant Project SAR 2015-04 EAR Number: Project: 1 Lot into 4 Lot Reconfiguration Site: Lot 9 on SP197677 204 Neill Road, Mooloolah Valley, QLD Version Date Distribution Key changes made Author/s Approver 1 31st July 2015 N/A Nick Willis Joshua Lee Joshua Lee 2 9th September Update Plan of Nick Willis Joshua Lee 2015 Development Joshua Lee © 2015 i Ecological Assessment Report v2 NCES REF: SAR2015-04 EAR Lot 9 SP197677– 204 Neill Road, Mooloolah Valley EXECUTIVE SUMMARY North Coast Environmental Services was commissioned by David and Carolyn Sargeant to prepare an Ecological Assessment Report (EAR) for Lot 9 on SP197677, located at 204 Neill Road, Mooloolah Valley (referenced hereafter as ‘the site’). The EAR was requested to identify the environmental values of the site and to determine the suitability of a proposed Reconfiguration of a Lot (1 Lot into 4 Lots) development application for the site. The site is located in Mooloolah Valley and occupies the southern face and foothills of a steep ridgeline adjacent to Neill Road. The site is dominated by a mosaic of remnant and regrowth open Eucalypt forest on the mid to upper slopes and tall open eucalypt forest over vine forest understorey flanking the central watercourse at the toe of the slope. A largely cleared area is present over gentle grades within the centre of the site in which the proposed development is to be located. One unit of remnant vegetation containing ‘least concern’ Regional Ecosystem (RE) ‘12.9-10.14 Eucalyptus pilularis tall open forest on sedimentary rocks’ is mapped across the upper slopes of the site on the Department of Natural Resources and Mine’s (NRM’s) Regulated Vegetation Management Support Map. No clearing impact is proposed to remnant vegetation within the site. One flora species, Pararistolochia praevenosa (Richmond birdwing vine) which is listed as a ‘near threatened’ species under the QLD Nature Conservation Act 1992 (NC Act) was located within wet sclerophyll/vine forest vegetation flanking the central watercourse. No impacts to this species at this locality are likely as no vegetation clearing is proposed within 100m of the identified individual plant. No other flora species listed under the NC Act or the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act) were found on site. A habitat assessment of the site determined the on-site vegetation represents both edge and core components of the local east-west aligned bushland corridor. Retention of viable connectivity through the mid to upper slopes of the site is deemed critical to maintain viable corridor connectivity along the southern face of the ridge, to bushland areas to the east and west of the site. The site is likely to host a moderate assemblage of resident terrestrial fauna. The extent of intact remnant open eucalypt forest within and bordering the site infers potential for listed fauna species to be present in the locality. The assessed clearing footprint is expected to impact a total of 0.1 ha of individual Eucalypts over grassy understorey (grazed and routinely slashed) which is mapped as an ecologically important area under the Sunshine Coast Planning Scheme 2014 Biodiversity, Waterways and Wetlands Overlay Map. This equates to approximately 98% retention of the total area (5.2 ha approx.) of mapped ecologically important areas on the site. The proposed site layout has been designed to minimise impact to the in-situ vegetation communities. The extent of proposed clearing is aggregated within existing cleared and regrowth areas. The layout retains the important east - west bushland corridor across the slopes of the ridgeline and also proposes registration of a conservation covenant over all remnant vegetation within the site. Overall the application represents a low impact development. The application has been assessed against Local, State and Commonwealth environmental and conservation development assessment frameworks, and determined to be compliant as follows: · Sunshine Coast Planning Scheme 2014, Code 8.2.3 Biodiversity, Waterways and Wetlands – Compliant subject fulfilment of recommendations set herein; · SEQ Koala State Regulatory Planning Provisions – Compliant subject fulfilment of recommendations set herein; · Nature Conservation Act 1992 – Compliant; however no fauna survey conducted; · Module 8 QLD Sustainable Development Assessment Provisions & Vegetation Management Act 1999 – Compliant; and · Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 – Generally Compliant; however no fauna survey conducted. © 2015 2 Ecological Assessment Report v2 NCES REF: SAR2015-04 EAR Lot 9 SP197677– 204 Neill Road, Mooloolah Valley CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................... 2 1.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................ 4 2.0 DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL ..................................................................................................... 5 3.0 SITE DESCRIPTION .................................................................................................................... 6 3.1 Topography ........................................................................................................................................ 7 3.2 Vegetation .......................................................................................................................................... 9 3.3 Soils ................................................................................................................................................... 9 3.4 Access ............................................................................................................................................... 9 4.0 SURVEY METHODOLOGY ...................................................................................................... 10 5.0 SURVEY RESULTS ..................................................................................................................... 10 5.1 Flora Species ....................................................................................................................................10 5.2 Vegetation Communities ...................................................................................................................11 5.2.1 Vegetation Unit 1 – Open Eucalypt forest over grassy/shrubby understorey ........ 12 5.2.2 Vegetation Unit 2 – Tall Open Eucalypt Forest with Rainforest Understorey .......... 13 5.3 Weeds ..............................................................................................................................................14 5.4 Fauna Records..................................................................................................................................14 5.5 Habitat ..............................................................................................................................................14 5.6 Surrounding Habitat and Connectivity ................................................................................................15 6.0 DEVELOPMENT IMPACTS ....................................................................................................... 16 6.1 Vegetation .........................................................................................................................................16 6.1.1 On-site.......................................................................................................................... 16 6.1.2 Off-site.......................................................................................................................... 16 6.2 Fauna ...............................................................................................................................................17 7.0 LEGISLATION AND OVERLAYS ............................................................................................... 18 7.1 Local Government – Sunshine Coast Planning Scheme 2014 ............................................................18 7.1.1 Code 8.2.3 Biodiversity, Waterways and Wetlands.................................................. 18 7.2 State Government .............................................................................................................................25 7.2.1 QLD NRM Remnant Regional Ecosystems ................................................................ 25 7.2.2 SDAP Module 8 Native Vegetation Clearing – Purpose and Assessment Framework ........................................................................................................................... 25 7.2.3 SEQ Koala State Planning Regulatory Provision May 2010 ...................................... 27 7.2.4 QLD Nature Conservation Act 1992 .......................................................................... 29 7.3 Commonwealth Government .............................................................................................................32 7.3.1 EPBC Act Protected Matters Search Tool ................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • FAUNA MANAGEMENT PLAN (V1) LOT 3 RP901259 138 KING ROAD MOOLOOLAH VALLEY
    FAUNA MANAGEMENT PLAN (v1) LOT 3 RP901259 138 KING ROAD MOOLOOLAH VALLEY FOR GROVE PARTNERS PTY LTD JANUARY 2018 PO Box 9566 Pacific Paradise QLD 4564 / Email: [email protected] ABN 44 851 168 122 Fauna Management Plan v1 NCES REF: GRO 2018-01 FMP Lot 3 on RP901259 – 138 King Road, Mooloolah Valley DOCUMENT CONTROL Document Fauna Management Plan v1 Client: Grove Partners Pty Ltd Project Number: GRO 2018 - 01 Site: Lot 3 on RP901259 138 King Road, Mooloolah Valley, QLD Version Date Distribution Author/s Approver 1 January 2018 Blake Bell - Murray N. Willis – B. Sc. Joshua Lee & Associates Principal Environmental Scientist B. Sc. AES, mEIANZ DISCLAIMER To the extent permitted by law, North Coast Environmental Services (including its employees, partners and consultants) excludes all liability to any person for any consequences, including but not limited to all losses, damages, costs, expenses, and any other compensation, arising directly or indirectly, from using this publication (in part or whole) and any information or material contained in it. 2018 i Fauna Management Plan v1 NCES REF: GRO 2018-01 FMP Lot 3 on RP901259 – 138 King Road, Mooloolah Valley Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 BACKGROUND 1 1.2 SITE DESCRIPTION 1 2 EXISTING HABITAT TYPES 2 2.1 VEGETATION UNITS 2 2.2 VEGETATION UNIT 1 – NOTOPHYLL VINE FOREST 4 2.3 VEGETATION UNIT 2 – OPEN EUCALYPT FOREST WITH DISTURBED UNDERSTOREY 4 2.4 WILDLIFE ONLINE DATABASE 4 2.5 SURROUNDING HABITAT AND CONNECTIVITY 5 3 VEGETATION CLEARING IMPACTS 7 4 CLEARING FAUNA AND HABITAT
    [Show full text]
  • I Is the Sunda-Sahul Floristic Exchange Ongoing?
    Is the Sunda-Sahul floristic exchange ongoing? A study of distributions, functional traits, climate and landscape genomics to investigate the invasion in Australian rainforests By Jia-Yee Samantha Yap Bachelor of Biotechnology Hons. A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at The University of Queensland in 2018 Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation i Abstract Australian rainforests are of mixed biogeographical histories, resulting from the collision between Sahul (Australia) and Sunda shelves that led to extensive immigration of rainforest lineages with Sunda ancestry to Australia. Although comprehensive fossil records and molecular phylogenies distinguish between the Sunda and Sahul floristic elements, species distributions, functional traits or landscape dynamics have not been used to distinguish between the two elements in the Australian rainforest flora. The overall aim of this study was to investigate both Sunda and Sahul components in the Australian rainforest flora by (1) exploring their continental-wide distributional patterns and observing how functional characteristics and environmental preferences determine these patterns, (2) investigating continental-wide genomic diversities and distances of multiple species and measuring local species accumulation rates across multiple sites to observe whether past biotic exchange left detectable and consistent patterns in the rainforest flora, (3) coupling genomic data and species distribution models of lineages of known Sunda and Sahul ancestry to examine landscape-level dynamics and habitat preferences to relate to the impact of historical processes. First, the continental distributions of rainforest woody representatives that could be ascribed to Sahul (795 species) and Sunda origins (604 species) and their dispersal and persistence characteristics and key functional characteristics (leaf size, fruit size, wood density and maximum height at maturity) of were compared.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity Summary: Cape York, Queensland
    Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations.
    [Show full text]
  • Mackay Whitsunday, Queensland
    Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations.
    [Show full text]
  • Cape York, Queensland
    Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Guide to Users Background What is the summary for and where does it come from? This summary has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. It highlights important elements of the biodiversity of the region in two ways: • Listing species which may be significant for management because they are found only in the region, mainly in the region, or they have a conservation status such as endangered or vulnerable. • Comparing the region to other parts of Australia in terms of the composition and distribution of its species, to suggest components of its biodiversity which may be nationally significant. The summary was produced using the Australian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. The list of families covered in ANHAT is shown in Appendix 1. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are are not not included included in the in the summary. • The data used for this summary come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity Summary: Burnett Mary, Queensland
    Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations.
    [Show full text]
  • Triunia Environmental Reserve Management Plan
    Triunia Environmental Reserve Management Plan 2016 - 2026 © Sunshine Coast Council 2009-current. Sunshine Coast Council™ is a registered trademark of Sunshine Coast Council. www.sunshinecoast.qld.gov.au [email protected] T 07 5475 7272 F 07 5475 7277 Locked Bag 72 Sunshine Coast Mail Centre Qld 4560 Acknowledgements Council wishes to thank all contributors and stakeholders involved in the development of this document. Disclaimer Information contained in this document is based on available information at the time of writing. All figures and diagrams are indicative only and should be referred to as such. While the Sunshine Coast Council has exercised reasonable care in preparing this document it does not warrant or represent that it is accurate or complete. Council or its officers accept no responsibility for any loss occasioned to any person acting or refraining from acting in reliance upon any material contained in this document. Contents 1. Executive Summary .............................................................................. 5 2. Acknowledgements ............................................................................ 6 3. Introduction........................................................................................... 7 3.1 Purpose of the Management Plan ................................................... 7 3.2 Management Intent for the reserve .................................................. 7 4. Description of the reserve .................................................................... 7 4.1
    [Show full text]
  • Springbrook Public Conservation Estate Fire Strategy Springbrook / Numinbah / Austinville September 2009
    Springbrook Public Conservation Estate Fire Strategy Springbrook / Numinbah / Austinville September 2009 Prepared by: QPWS Conservation Management Unit and GCCC Natural Areas Management Unit Table of contents 1 Introduction .......................................................9 List of Tables 1.1 Climate ............................................................12 1.2 Regional context ..............................................12 Table 1 Native flora species of particular 1.3 Fire history .......................................................13 management significance with information 1.4 Objectives for fire management .......................14 on potential value as indicators in monitoring programmes .............................................20 2 Flora ..................................................................15 Table 2 Details of priority weeds in relation to fire 2.1 Vegetation description .....................................15 management ............................................22 2.2 Native species/communities of significance and/or Table 3 Fire management objectives and potential indicator species......................................19 preferred fire regimes for the vegetation 2.3 Priority weeds in relation to fire management ..21 communities .............................................24 2.4 Objectives, risk assessment and guidelines .......22 Table 4 Fauna species of significance with information on potential value as indicators 3 Fauna ................................................................27 in monitoring
    [Show full text]
  • Onsequences of Rainforest Fragmentation for Frugivorous Vertebrates and Seed Dispersal
    Consequences of Rainforest Fragmentation for Frugivorous Vertebrates and Seed Dispersal Author Moran, Catherine Published 2007 Thesis Type Thesis (PhD Doctorate) School Griffith School of Environment DOI https://doi.org/10.25904/1912/54 Copyright Statement The author owns the copyright in this thesis, unless stated otherwise. Downloaded from http://hdl.handle.net/10072/367385 Griffith Research Online https://research-repository.griffith.edu.au Consequences of rainforest fragmentation for frugivorous vertebrates and seed dispersal Catherine Moran B.Sc. (Hons.) Griffith School of Environment Faculty of Science, Engineering, Environment and Technology Griffith University Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy June, 2007 Abstract Seed dispersal strongly influences patterns of plant regeneration. Frugivorous (fruit eating) vertebrates disperse the seeds of between 70% and 90% of rainforest plant species. Forest fragmentation may affect the abundance and distribution of frugivore species. Consequently, patterns of seed dispersal and plant regeneration may vary between extensive forest and fragmented forest landscapes. This thesis assessed frugivorous vertebrates and seed dispersal in a rainforest landscape in subtropical Australia. First, this study quantitatively compared the distribution and abundance of frugivorous bird and bat species between fragmented and extensive rainforest. Second, the roles of these frugivore species in seed dispersal were evaluated based on their functional attributes and the plant species that they had been recorded consuming. Third, secondary consequences of forest fragmentation for seed dispersal were predicted from these results. The field components of this study were conducted in the Sunshine Coast region of southern Queensland. Surveys of frugivorous bird and bat species were undertaken in a network of 48 study sites distributed throughout a 4 000 km2 area.
    [Show full text]
  • Preliminary Terrestrial Vertebrate Fauna Habitat Assessment
    Maroochy Shire to Noosa Shire Northern Pipeline Interconnector Stage Two PRELIMINARY TERRESTRIAL VERTEBRATE FAUNA HABITAT ASSESSMENT Report prepared For Southern Regional Water Pipeline Alliance FAUNA AND HABITAT SPECIALISTS Document Control Sheet File Number: 0134-003a Version 0 Project Manager: Paula Boosamra Client: Southern Regional Water Pipeline Alliance Project Title: Preliminary Terrestrial Vertebrate Fauna Habitat Assessment Project Author/s: Paula Boosamra, Adrian Caneris, Adam Abbott Project Summary: This project involved an assessment of significant habitat areas and listed terrestrial vertebrate fauna species that occur or have the potential to occur along Stage Two of the proposed alignment of the Northern Pipeline Interconnector (NPI) including the NPI corridor and the connection to the Image Flat Water Treatment Plant. The proposed NPI corridor runs from Nobels Road in Maroochy Shire to the Noosa Water Treatment Plant in Noosa Shire. The proposed connection to the Image Flat Water Treatment Plant runs west from the NPI corridor 81 km marker to Image Flat Water Treatment Plant north- west of Nambour. Draft Preparation History Draft No. Date draft Reviewed by Issued by completed 0134-003a Draft A 20/11/07 Paulette Jones Paula Boosamra 0134-003a Draft B 28/11/07 Paulette Jones Paula Boosamra Revision/ Checking History Track Version Date of Issue Checked by Issued by Version 0 13/12/07 Paula Boosamra Paula Boosamra Document Distribution Destination Revision 1 Date 2 Date 3 Date Dispatched Dispatched Dispatched Client Copy 1 - A 20/11/07 B 28/11/07 0 13/12/07 digital Client Copy 1 0 13/12/07 - hard copy PDF - server A 20/11/07 B 28/11/07 0 13/12/07 PDF – backup – A 20/11/07 B 28/11/07 0 13/12/07 archived Disk/tape Hard Copy -library 0 13/12/07 BAAM Pty Ltd File No: 0134-003a Version 0 NOTICE TO USERS OF THIS REPORT Copyright and reproduction This report and all indexes, schedules, annexures or appendices are subject to copyright pursuant to the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth).
    [Show full text]
  • Subtropical Gardening Magazine INDEX – up to and Including Issue 38 Format: 38(7) Means Issue THIRTY EIGHT (Page 7) – This May Be Text Or Image
    subTropical Gardening magazine INDEX – up to and including Issue 38 Format: 38(7) means Issue THIRTY EIGHT (page 7) – this may be text or image -A- Acacia sophorae – 1(74); 9(63) Abelia chinensis – 35(44) Acacia victoriae – 9(62, 63); 23(11) Abelia floribunda – 19(13); should be Abelia x Acacia wickhamii – 23(14) grandiflora Acalypha – 1(9); 3(29); 4(71, 91); 12(54) Abelia grandiflora – 11(36); 12(71); should be Abelia x Acalypha chamaedrifolia ‘Stephie’ – 26(69, 74); now grandiflora named Acalypha herzogiana Abelia uniflora – 35(44) Acalypha hispida – 14(72, 73); 15(85); 17(72); 21(66) Abelia x grandiflora – 16(72); 17(72); 19(13); 33(11); Acalypha lysonii – 12(71) 35(42, 44) Acalypha reptans – 10(48) Abelia x grandiflora ‘Francis Mason’ – 11(36); 22(33) Acalypha reptans var. pygmaea – 5(40); 12(18, 62); Abelia x grandiflora = A. chinensis x A. uniflora 14(73); 15(34, 73); 16(73); 17(73); renamed as Abelmoschus esculentus (okra) – 14(53); 16(69); Acalypha chamaedrifolia; Acalypha herzogiana 17(67); 18(67); 19(67); 20(67); 21(66); 22(66); 23(68); Acalypha siamensis – 12(71) 24(68); 25(72); 26(70); 27(70); 28(66); 29(66); 30(69); Acalypha wilkesiana – 1(10, 34); 3(30); 6(17); 12(67); 31(71); 32(69); 33(69); 34(68) 14(89); 18(71); 19(11); 21(66); 22(37); 24(32, 34, 38); Abelmoschus manihot – 8(29, 81); 14(70); 16(68); 30(12, 13); 33(18); 35(42); 37(46, 47) 18(71); 19(73); 20(70); 21(71); 22(58-59); 28(64, 68); Acalypha wilkesiana ‘Compacta’ – 12(68) 31(69); 32(72); 33(72) Acalypha wilkesiana ‘Macrophylla’ – 12(30); 13(17) Abelmoschus moschatus
    [Show full text]
  • Woolgoolga to Ballina EIS Working Paper, Biodiversity, Appendices F
    Upgrading the Pacific Highway – Woolgoolga to Ballina Upgrade Appendix F Vegetation association floristics Biodiversity assessment PAGE 921 Upgrading the Pacific Highway – Woolgoolga to Ballina Upgrade PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY BLANK Biodiversity assessment PAGE 922 Upgrading the Pacific Highway – Woolgoolga to Ballina Upgrade 1 Iluka Road - Woodburn Vegetation association Structural formation Northern Rivers CMA Threatened Community Habitat vegetation type or species Stringybark-Ironbark-Pink Dry Sclerophyll open Red Mahogany open Nil Mid to lower slopes of low undulating rises on Bloodwood forest forest of the coastal Clarence-Morton Bay sediments in the lowlands of the North southern half of the study area Coast Dominant upper stratum species Dominant mid stratum species Dominant lower stratum species Eucalyptus tindaliae Syncarpia glomulifera Imperata cylindrica Corymbia intermedia Acacia concurrens Themeda australis Eucalyptus siderophloia Acacia disparrima Eragrostis brownii Allocasuarina torulosa Pteridium esculentum Pultenaea retusa Hibbertia aspera Associated upper stratum species Pultenaea euchila Gonocarpus tetragynus Eucalyptus signata Lomandra confertifolia ssp. pallida Angophora woodsiana Lomandra longifolia subsp. longifolia 2 Iluka Road - Woodburn Vegetation association Structural formation Northern Rivers CMA Threatened Community Habitat vegetation type or species Ironbark-Tallowwood-Grey Dry Sclerophyll open Narrow-leaved Red Gum Nil Low hills at the northern end of the study area. Gum-Bloodwood-Red Gum forest woodlands of
    [Show full text]