Report to:

Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario

Document No. 1295890100-REP-R0001-02

1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Report to:

TECHNICAL REPORT ON THE MAGINO PROPERTY,WAWA,ONTARIO

EFFECTIVE DATE:OCTOBER 4, 2012

Prepared by Patrick Huxtable, MAIG (RPGeo) Todd McCracken, P.Geo. Todd Kanhai, P.Eng.

PT/JW/jc

1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Report to:

TECHNICAL REPORT ON THE MAGINO PROPERTY,WAWA,ONTARIO

EFFECTIVE DATE:OCTOBER 4, 2012

“Original document signed by Prepared by Patrick Huxtable, MAIG (RPGeo)” Date October 4, 2012 Patrick Huxtable, MAIG (RPGeo)

“Original document signed by Prepared by Todd McCracken, P.Geo.” Date October 4, 2012 Todd McCracken, P.Geo.

“Original document signed by Prepared by Todd Kanhai, P.Eng.” Date October 4, 2012 Todd Kanhai, P.Eng.

“Original document signed by Reviewed by Jeff Wilson, Ph.D., P.Geo.” Date October 4, 2012 Jeff Wilson, Ph.D., P.Geo.

“Original document signed by Authorized by Jeff Wilson, Ph.D., P.Geo.” Date October 4, 2012 Jeff Wilson, Ph.D., P.Geo.

PT/JW/jc

Suite 900, 330 Bay Street, Toronto, Ontario M5H 2S8 Phone: 416-368-9080 Fax: 416-368-1963

1295890100-REP-R0001-02 REVISION HISTORY

REV. PREPARED BY REVIEWED BY APPROVED BY NO ISSUE DATE AND DATE AND DATE AND DATE DESCRIPTION OF REVISION 00 2012/09/20 Patrick Huxtable Jeff Wilson Jeff Wilson Draft to Client for review. Todd McCracken 01 2012/09/27 Patrick Huxtable Jeff Wilson Jeff Wilson Draft to Client for review. Todd McCracken 02 2012/10/04 Patrick Huxtable Jeff Wilson Jeff Wilson Final to Client. Todd McCracken Todd Kanhai

1295890100-REP-R0001-02 TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 SUMMARY ...... 1 1.1 INTRODUCTION ...... 1 1.2 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION AND OWNERSHIP...... 1 1.3 GEOLOGY AND MINERALIZATION ...... 2 1.4 MINERAL RESOURCE ESTIMATE...... 2 1.5 RECOMMENDATIONS ...... 5 1.5.1 DRILLING ...... 5 1.5.2 PREFEASIBILITY STUDY...... 5 2.0 INTRODUCTION ...... 6 3.0 RELIANCE ON OTHER EXPERTS...... 7 4.0 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION ...... 8 4.1 LOCATION...... 8 4.2 STATUS OF THE MINING TITLES ...... 9 4.3 ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS ...... 12 5.0 ACCESSIBILITY, CLIMATE, LOCAL RESOURCES, INFRASTRUCTURE AND PHYSIOGRAPHY...... 14 5.1 ACCESSIBILITY...... 14 5.2 CLIMATE...... 14 5.3 LOCAL RESOURCES ...... 14 5.4 INFRASTRUCTURE ...... 14 5.5 PHYSIOGRAPHY ...... 15 6.0 HISTORY...... 17 6.1 1950-1999...... 17 6.2 2000-2010 GOLDEN GOOSE ...... 22 6.2.1 2000...... 22 6.2.2 2001...... 23 6.2.3 2002...... 24 6.2.4 2004...... 24 6.2.5 2006...... 25 6.2.6 2007...... 26 6.2.7 2008...... 27 6.2.8 2009...... 28 6.2.9 2010...... 28 7.0 GEOLOGICAL SETTING AND MINERALIZATION...... 30 7.1 THE ARCHEAN SUPERIOR PROVINCE ...... 30 7.2 THE WAWA SUBPROVINCE ...... 30

i 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 7.3 THE MICHIPICOTEN GREENSTONE BELT...... 33 7.4 THE GEOLOGY OF THE MAGINO MINE AREA ...... 35 7.5 GOLD MINERALIZATION ...... 38 7.6 STRUCTURES ASSOCIATED WITH GOLD MINERALIZATION...... 40 7.7 CURRENT VIEW ON MINERALIZATION CONTROLS AND IDENTIFICATION OF MINERALIZED MATERIAL ZONES...... 41 8.0 DEPOSIT TYPES ...... 44 9.0 EXPLORATION...... 48 10.0 DRILLING...... 49 10.1.1 TYPE AND EXTENT ...... 49 10.1.2 DRILL COLLARS ...... 56 10.1.3 DOWN-HOLE SURVEYS...... 56 10.1.4 GEOLOGICAL LOGGING ...... 56 10.1.5 DRILLHOLE CASING...... 59 10.1.6 2011/12 DIAMOND DRILLING RESULTS ...... 60 10.1.7 CORE RECOVERY ...... 67 10.1.8 SAMPLING METHOD ...... 67 10.1.9 DRILL PLAN ...... 68 11.0 SAMPLE PREPARATION, ANALYSES, AND SECURITY...... 70 11.1 SAMPLE PREPARATION...... 70 11.2 LABORATORY FACILITIES...... 70 11.2.1 ACTIVATION LABORATORIES LTD...... 70 11.2.2 ALS CHEMEX ...... 70 11.3 SAMPLE SPLITTING AND REDUCTION...... 71 11.3.1 ACTIVATION LABORATORIES ...... 71 11.3.2 ALS CHEMEX ...... 71 11.4 ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES...... 71 11.4.1 ACTIVATION LABORATORIES ...... 71 11.4.2 ALS CHEMEX ...... 72 11.4.3 COARSE REJECT AND PULP STORAGE ...... 73 11.5 PRODIGY QUALITY CONTROL FOR 2011/2012...... 73 11.5.1 BLANK...... 73 11.5.2 BLANK CDN-BL-8...... 74 11.5.3 BLANK CDN-BL-9...... 75 11.5.4 BLANK CDN-BL-10...... 76 11.5.5 DIABASE (COARSE)BLANK...... 77 11.5.6 LOW GRADE STANDARD CDN-GS-P2 ...... 78 11.5.7 LOW GRADE STANDARD CDN-GS-P2A...... 79 11.5.8 LOW GRADE STANDARD CDN-GS-P3B...... 80 11.5.9 LOW GRADE STANDARD CDN-GS-P4A...... 81 11.5.10 LOW GRADE STANDARD CDN-GS-P7E...... 82 11.5.11 AVERAGE GRADE STANDARD CDN-GS-1G ...... 83 11.5.12 AVERAGE GRADE STANDARD CDN-GS-1H...... 84 11.5.13 AVERAGE GRADE STANDARD CDN-GS-1J ...... 85

ii 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 11.5.14 AVERAGE GRADE STANDARD CDN-GS-1P5C ...... 86 11.5.15 AVERAGE GRADE STANDARD CDN-GS-1P5D ...... 87 11.5.16 MODERATE GRADE STANDARD CDN-GS-2G...... 88 11.5.17 MODERATE GRADE STANDARD CDN-GS-2J...... 89 11.5.18 MODERATE GRADE STANDARD CDN-GS-2K ...... 90 11.5.19 HIGH GRADE STANDARD CDN-GS-3G ...... 91 11.5.20 HIGH GRADE STANDARD CDN-GS-3H ...... 92 11.5.21 HIGH GRADE STANDARD CDN-GS-3J ...... 93 11.5.22 HIGH GRADE STANDARD CDN-GS-4B...... 94 11.5.23 HIGH GRADE STANDARD CDN-GS-4D ...... 95 11.5.24 ULTRA HIGH GRADE STANDARD CDN-GS-7B...... 96 11.5.25 ULTRA HIGH GRADE STANDARD CDN-GS-14A...... 97 11.5.26 ULTRA HIGH GRADE STANDARD CDN-GS-30B...... 98 11.5.27 QA/QC OPPORTUNITIES ...... 99 11.5.28 QP OPINION ...... 100 12.0 DATA VERIFICATION ...... 101 13.0 MINERAL PROCESSING AND METALLURGICAL TESTING...... 103 13.1 LAKEFIELD RESEARCH –OCTOBER 1997...... 103 13.3 G&T METALLURGICAL SERVICES LTD.–SEPTEMBER 2011 ...... 108 13.4 STARKEY &ASSOCIATES INC.–OCTOBER 2011 ...... 110 13.5 G&T METALLURGICAL SERVICES LTD. – 2012...... 114 13.6 CONCLUSIONS ...... 114 14.0 MINERAL RESOURCE ESTIMATES...... 115 14.1 SNOWDEN 2011 RESOURCE ESTIMATE...... 115 14.2 TETRA TECH 2012 RESOURCE ESTIMATE ...... 116 14.2.1 DATABASE...... 116 14.2.2 SPECIFIC GRAVITY...... 116 14.2.3 EXPLORATORY DATA ANALYSIS...... 117 14.2.4 GEOLOGICAL INTERPRETATION...... 121 14.2.5 SPATIAL ANALYSIS...... 125 14.2.6 RESOURCE BLOCK MODEL...... 127 14.2.7 RESOURCE MODEL DEPLETION ...... 127 14.2.8 BLOCK MODEL REGULARISATION...... 128 14.2.9 RESOURCE CLASSIFICATION...... 134 14.2.10 MINERAL RESOURCE TABULATION...... 134 14.2.11 VALIDATION ...... 137 14.2.12 MODEL PARAMETER DIFFERENCES...... 143 15.0 ADJACENT PROPERTIES...... 144 16.0 OTHER RELEVANT DATA AND INFORMATION...... 145 17.0 INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS ...... 146 18.0 RECOMMENDATIONS ...... 148 18.1 DRILLING ...... 148 18.1.1 MAGINO RESOURCE EXPANSION ...... 148

iii 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 18.1.2 MAGINO RESOURCE DELINEATION...... 148 18.2 PREFEASIBILITY STUDY ...... 149 19.0 REFERENCES ...... 150 20.0 CERTIFICATE OF QUALIFIED PERSON...... 159

LIST OF TABLES

Table 1.1 Mineral Resource Estimate for Magino – September 2012...... 4 Table 4.1 Description of the Mining Title Types in Ontario...... 9 Table 6.1 Historical Summary for Magino...... 18 Table 10.1 2011/2012 Prodigy Drilling ...... 50 Table 10.2 2011/2012 Drilling Significant Intercepts...... 60 Table 12.1 Drill Collar Validation...... 102 Table 12.2 Drill Core Validation...... 102 Table 13.1 Lakefield Research (1997) – Head Assays ...... 103 Table 13.2 Gravity Separation Test Results ...... 104 Table 13.3 Cyanidation Results ...... 104 Table 13.4 Heap Leach Results...... 106 Table 13.5 Summary of Column Leach Test Results ...... 107 Table 13.6 Summary of Bottle Leach Test Results...... 108 Table 13.7 Summary of Reagent Consumption...... 108 Table 13.8 Assay Head Grades ...... 109 Table 13.9 Gold Extraction Test Results...... 110 Table 13.10 Summary of SAGDesign Test Work Results and Calculated Parameters ...... 111 Table 13.11 Summary of Calculated Mill Sizes and Grinding Equipment ...... 112 Table 14.1 Drill Data Set ...... 116 Table 14.2 Specific Gravity Data...... 117 Table 14.3 Drillhole Assay Statistics (Length-Weighted)...... 117 Table 14.4 Grade Capping/Threshold Values...... 119 Table 14.5 Composite Statistics (Length-Weighted)...... 120 Table 14.6 Wireframe Statistics ...... 123 Table 14.7 Variography Parameters ...... 126 Table 14.8 Parent Block Model ...... 127 Table 14.9 Estimation Criteria...... 130 Table 14.10 Search Criteria ...... 132 Table 14.11 Webb Lake Stock Domain Tonnes and Grade ...... 134 Table 14.12 Lovell Lake Stock Domain Tonnes and Grade ...... 135 Table 14.13 South Metavolcanics Domain Tonnes and Grade ...... 135 Table 14.14 North Meta Volcanics Domain Tonnes and Grade ...... 136 Table 14.15 Magino Deposit Tonnes and Grade...... 136 Table 14.16 Magino Resource Estimate, September 2012...... 137 Table 14.17 Global Mean Statistics ...... 140 Table 14.18 Model Parameter Differences ...... 143 Table 14.19 Comparable Grades...... 143 Table 18.1 Resource Expansion Drilling...... 148

iv 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Table 18.2 Magino Resource Delineation Drilling...... 149

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure 4.1 Location Map of the Magino Property in Ontario ...... 8 Figure 4.2 Claim Map of the Magino Property ...... 10 Figure 5.1 Topography and Accessibility of the Magino Property ...... 16 Figure 7.1 Tectonic Subdivisions of the Superior Province of Northern Ontario ...... 31 Figure 7.2 Major Geological Elements of the Eastern Wawa Subprovince ...... 32 Figure 7.3 Mineral Belts in the Michipicoten-Shebandowan Region of the Wawa Subprovince...... 33 Figure 7.4 Geology of the Magino Mine Area ...... 37 Figure 7.5 Historical G Zone in the 24+75E Drift ...... 39 Figure 7.6 Gold Bearing Veins on the Face of the 23+80E Drift...... 40 Figure 8.1 Schematic Diagram Illustrating the Inferred Crustal Levels of Gold Deposition...... 44 Figure 8.2 Schematic Diagram Illustrating the Setting of Greenstone-Hosted Quartz Carbonate Vein Deposits ...... 45 Figure 8.3 Location of the Goudreau Lake Deformation Zone...... 47 Figure 10.1 Diamond Drill Rig ...... 49 Figure 10.2 Core Logging Facility...... 57 Figure 10.3 Core Cutting Facility...... 57 Figure 10.4 Specific Gravity Station ...... 58 Figure 10.5 Core Storage Facility...... 59 Figure 10.6 Drill Collar Cap ...... 60 Figure 10.7 Plan View of 2011/2012 Drill Collars at the Property...... 69 Figure 11.1 Blank QA/QC Chart...... 74 Figure 11.2 CDN-BL-08 QA/QC Chart ...... 75 Figure 11.3 CDN-BL-09 QA/QC Chart ...... 76 Figure 11.4 CDN-BL-10 QA/QC Chart ...... 77 Figure 11.5 Diabase Blank QA/QC Chart...... 78 Figure 11.6 CDN-GS-P2 Process Performance Chart...... 79 Figure 11.7 CDN-GS-P2A Process Performance Chart ...... 80 Figure 11.8 CDN-GS-P3B Process Performance Chart ...... 81 Figure 11.9 CDN-GS-P4A Process Performance Chart ...... 82 Figure 11.10 CDN-GS-P7E Process Performance Chart ...... 83 Figure 11.11 CDN-GS-1G Process Performance Chart ...... 84 Figure 11.12 CDN-GS-1H Process Performance Chart...... 85 Figure 11.13 CDN-GS-1J Process Performance Chart ...... 86 Figure 11.14 CDN-GS-1P5C Process Performance Chart ...... 87 Figure 11.15 CDN-GS-1P5D Process Performance Chart ...... 88 Figure 11.16 CDN-GS-2G Process Performance Chart ...... 89 Figure 11.17 CDN-GS-2J Process Performance Chart ...... 90 Figure 11.18 CDN-GS-2K Process Performance Chart...... 91 Figure 11.19 CDN-GS-3G Process Performance Chart ...... 92 Figure 11.20 CDN-GS-3H Process Performance Chart...... 93 Figure 11.21 CDN-GS-3J Process Performance Chart ...... 94

v 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Figure 11.22 CDN-GS-4B Process Performance Chart...... 95 Figure 11.23 CDN-GS-4D Process Performance Chart...... 96 Figure 11.24 CDN-GS-7B Process Performance Chart...... 97 Figure 11.25 CDN-GS-14A Process Performance Chart...... 98 Figure 11.26 CDN-GS-30B Process Performance Chart...... 99 Figure 13.1 Test Flowsheet ...... 109 Figure 14.1 Histogram of all Raw Magino Data ...... 118 Figure 14.2 Log-Probability Plot of all Raw Magino Data ...... 118 Figure 14.3 Histogram of all 5 m Composite Magino Data ...... 120 Figure 14.4 Log-Probability Plot of all 5 m Composite Magino Data ...... 121 Figure 14.5 Regularization ...... 129 Figure 14.6 Cross Section ...... 138 Figure 14.7 Plan View of Magino...... 139 Figure 14.8 Swath Plots for Gold OK versus ID2 Estimates ...... 141 Figure 14.9 Swath Plots for Gold OK versus NN Estimates ...... 142

GLOSSARY

UNITS OF MEASURE above mean sea level ...... amsl acre...... ac ampere...... A annum (year)...... a billion...... B billion tonnes...... Bt billion years ago...... Ga British thermal unit ...... BTU centimetre ...... cm cubic centimetre...... cm3 cubic feet per minute...... cfm cubic feet per second...... ft3/s cubic foot...... ft3 cubic inch...... in3 cubic metre ...... m3 cubic yard...... yd3 Coefficients of Variation ...... CVs day ...... d days per week...... d/wk days per year (annum)...... d/a dead weight tonnes...... DWT decibel adjusted...... dBa decibel ...... dB degree...... °

vi 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 degrees Celsius ...... °C diameter...... ø dollar (American)...... US$ dollar (Canadian) ...... Cdn$ dry metric ton ...... dmt foot...... ft gallon ...... gal gallons per minute (US) ...... gpm Gigajoule...... GJ gigapascal...... GPa gigawatt...... GW gram...... g grams per litre...... g/L grams per tonne...... g/t greater than...... > hectare (10,000 m2) ...... ha hertz...... Hz horsepower ...... hp hour...... h hours per day...... h/d hours per week ...... h/wk hours per year...... h/a inch ...... in kilo (thousand) ...... k kilogram ...... kg kilograms per cubic metre...... kg/m3 kilograms per hour ...... kg/h kilograms per square metre ...... kg/m2 kilometre ...... km kilometres per hour ...... km/h kilopascal ...... kPa kilotonne...... kt kilovolt...... kV kilovolt-ampere...... kVA kilovolts ...... kV kilowatt...... kW kilowatt hour...... kWh kilowatt hours per tonne...... kWh/t kilowatt hours per year...... kWh/a less than...... < litre ...... L litres per minute ...... L/m megabytes per second...... Mb/s megapascal...... MPa megavolt-ampere...... MVA megawatt ...... MW

vii 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 metre...... m metres above sea level ...... masl metres Baltic sea level ...... mbsl metres per minute ...... m/min metres per second ...... m/s microns ...... μm milligram...... mg milligrams per litre...... mg/L millilitre...... mL millimetre...... mm million...... M million bank cubic metres...... Mbm3 million bank cubic metres per annum...... Mbm3/a million tonnes...... Mt minute (plane angle) ...... ' minute (time)...... min month...... mo ounce ...... oz pascal ...... Pa centipoise...... mPas parts per million...... ppm parts per billion...... ppb percent...... % pound(s)...... lb pounds per square inch ...... psi revolutions per minute...... rpm second (plane angle) ...... " second (time) ...... s short ton (2,000 lb)...... st short tons per day ...... st/d short tons per year ...... st/y specific gravity ...... SG square centimetre ...... cm2 square foot...... ft2 square inch ...... in2 square kilometre ...... km2 square metre...... m2 three-dimensional ...... 3D tonne (1,000 kg) (metric ton)...... t tonnes per day ...... t/d tonnes per hour...... t/h tonnes per year...... t/a tonnes seconds per hour metre cubed...... ts/hm3 volt ...... V week ...... wk weight/weight ...... w/w

viii 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 wet metric ton...... wmt

ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS Accurassay Laboratories Ltd...... Accurassay Activation Laboratories Ltd...... Actlabs ALS Chemex Ltd...... ALS Chemex atomic absorption spectroscopy ...... AAS atomic absorption ...... AA BLM Bharti Engineering Ltd...... BLM Bond Work Index ...... BWI Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum...... CIM carbon-in-leach ...... CIL Cavendish Investing Ltd...... Cavendish certified reference materials...... CRMs diamond drillholes...... DDHs digital global positioning system ...... DGPS EBA Engineering Consultants Ltd., a Tetra Tech Company ...... EBA G&T Metallurgical Services Ltd...... G&T global positioning system...... GPS Golden Goose Resources Incorporated...... Golden Goose induced polarization...... IP inductively coupled plasma...... ICP International Electrotechnical Commission ...... IEC International Organization for Standardization...... ISO inverse distance squared...... ID2 Kappes Cassiday & Associates ...... KCA Kodiak Exploration Limited ...... Kodiak Laboratory Information Management System...... LIMS Lakefield Research Limited...... Lakefield Magino Project...... the Project Magino Property ...... the Property McNellen Resources Inc...... McNellen Resources Ministry of Environment ...... MOE MPH Resources Corp...... MPH Resources Muscocho Explorations Ltd...... Muscocho Explorations National Instrument 43-101...... NI 43-101 National Topography System...... NTS nearest neighbour...... NN net smelter return...... NSR North American Datum ...... NAD ordinary kriging ...... OK permit to take water ...... PTTW prefeasibility study ...... PFS preliminary economic assessment...... PEA

ix 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Prodigy Gold Incorporated...... Prodigy Qualified Persons ...... QPs quality assurance/quality control...... QA/QC Quantitative Kriging Neighborhood Analysis...... QKNA Reddick Consulting Inc...... Reddick Snowden Mining Industry Consultants Inc...... Snowden Starkey & Associates Inc...... Starkey specific gravity ...... SG Tetra Tech Wardrop...... Tetra Tech Toronto Stock Exchange Venture Exchange ...... TSXV Universal Transverse Mercator...... UTM

x 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 1.0 SUMMARY

1.1 INTRODUCTION

Prodigy Gold Incorporated (Prodigy) is a Canadian-registered resource Issuer that was formed in 2011 though the unification of Kodiak Exploration (Kodiak) and Golden Goose Resources Incorporated (Golden Goose).

Prodigy retained Tetra Tech Wardrop (Tetra Tech) to estimate a new mineral resource for the Magino Project (the Project), and disclose it in a technical report prepared in accordance with National Instrument 43-101 (NI 43-101). The Project is located approximately 40 km northeast of the town of Wawa, Ontario, Canada. This report replaces the preliminary economic assessment (PEA) produced in February 2012 by Tetra Tech. As the new resource estimate is significantly different from the existing one, Tetra Tech does not consider the mine plan and process disclosure utilized in the February 2012 PEA to be current. As such, the current technical report does not describe the PEA in depth.

1.2 PROPERTY D ESCRIPTION AND O WNERSHIP

Prodigy has a 100% interest in the Magino Property (the Property), which comprises seven patented mining claims (mining and surface rights), four leased mining claims, and 66 unpatented mining claims with a combined area of 5,131.180 acres (2,076.515 ha).

Prodigy also has an option agreement with MPH Resources Corp. (MPH Resources) to earn up to a 100% interest in the 128 ha Gould Gold property, located adjacent to the Property.

The Property is approximately 40 km northeast of the town of Wawa, Ontario, Canada, in Finan Township, which falls within the Sault Ste. Marie mining district of Ontario. The Project is approximately 14 km southeast of the town of Dubreuilville; the Project consists of an underground mine that was active between 1986 and 1992, and processed 768,678 t at a recovered grade of 0.137 tr oz/t gold to produce 105,543 tr oz of gold. Since the closure of the underground mine, Golden Goose, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Prodigy, conducted several studies that evaluated the feasibility of re-commencing underground operations and/or commencing open pit operations.

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 1 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario 1.3 GEOLOGY AND M INERALIZATION

The Property is located within the Michipicoten greenstone belt of the Archean Superior Province. The Michipicoten greenstone belt is a structurally and stratigraphically complex assemblage of volcanic, sedimentary and intrusive rocks that were metamorphosed to greenschist and amphibolite facies. Several suites of plutonic rocks ranging in composition from gabbro to monzogranite and syenite occur in and around the Michipicoten greenstone belt. The Property is situated in the Goudreau-Lochalsh gold district of the Wawa gold camp. Supracrustal rocks in the Goudreau-Lochalsh district consist of Cycle 2 felsic to intermediate pyroclastic metavolcanics capped by pyrite-bearing ironstone. To the north are pillowed, massive and schistose, mafic to intermediate metavolcanics and minor intercalations of Cycle 3 mafic pyroclastic rock. Several medium- to coarse-grained quartz dioritic to dioritic sills and/or dikes intrude all meta-volcanic rocks.

Gold mineralization at the former Magino Mine is dominantly hosted by the Webb Lake Stock, which intrudes Cycle 3 mafic volcanic rocks. The Webb Lake Stock is a felsic intrusion interpreted as a trondhjemite, but continues to be called a granodiorite in mine terminology. The long axis of the Webb Lake Stock is parallel to the regional supracrustal rock stratigraphy. The Webb Lake Stock is east northeast-striking and has a steep northerly dip. The granodiorite (trondhjemite) contains 5 to 10% veins of carbonate, quartz, tourmaline and pyrite in various orientations.

Prodigy is currently focusing its evaluation on zones of low-grade, gold-bearing quartz-sericite-pyrite mineralization that include narrow higher-grade gold-bearing veins, the target of former underground mining. Prodigy commenced a surface drilling program in early 2011 to in-fill and replace earlier sample data. This drilling continued into 2012 and the database used for the current study update (this report) includes this recent drilling information.

1.4 MINERAL R ESOURCE E STIMATE

The region of interest covers 1,350 m of the 075° trending Webb Lake granodiorite stock and the alteration zones that aggregate up to 300 m width, and dip steeply to depths of up to 600 m and remains open. At Magino the Webb Lake Stock is exposed at the surface and is locally covered by up to a maximum of 30 m thickness of fluvio-glacial material. The felsic and mafic volcanic country rock surrounding the stock does contain examples of low-grade mineralization encountered by drilling, however the main focus remains the broad low-grade alteration zones within the stock. A late-stage diabase dyke transects the Webb Lake Stock.

The database provided to Tetra Tech by Prodigy on the March 27, 2012, and an update on the June 8, 2012 contains 1,210 surface and underground diamond drillholes (DDHs) (for a total of 219,739 m). Seven hundred and nineteen holes for 170,357 m were drilled from surface and 491 holes for 49,382 m were drilled from the underground workings, only the underground holes with lengths greater than

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 2 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario 50 m were included after Snowden identified a significant assay bias with the less than 50 m holes (Ross 2011).

Since the estimate completed in November 2011 by Snowden Mining Industry Consultants Inc. (Snowden), Prodigy has completed a total of 242 surface DDHs for a total of 67,848 m, with an average length of 280 m all of which were NQ or NQ2 diameter and 12 of which were drilled as geotechnical holes.

A Vulcan™ block model with cell dimensions of 10 m (X) x 10 m (Y) x 5 m (Z) was coded to reflect the surface topography, base of overburden, Webb Lake granodiorite contacts, Lovell Lake granodiorite contacts, Intermediate metavolcanics, mineralization domain solids, and the late stage diabase dyke. The cell dimensions are based on the average 40 m spaced current drill pattern at the Property. A 3D wireframe model of the underground development and stopes was used to code a variable in the model “mined” to ensure that the reported mineral resource estimates are depleted for the prior mining activities. The Prodigy Geologists have interpreted some eight structural domains for the Webb Lake Stock, and three mineralized domains for the Lovell Lake Stock and 14 mineralization domains for the north and south metavolcanics, based on identified zones of mineralization in the drill cores.

Gold grades were estimated from 5 m length-weighted uncut composites into the interpreted mineralized blocks by ordinary kriging (OK), using parameters established from analysis of domain variography. The impact of the high gold grades was controlled using a combination of “sample per hole”, maximum distance extrapolation restrictions for grades above 28 g/t gold for the Webb Lake Stock, and 4.5 g/t gold for the Lovell Lake Stock, 7 g/t gold for the south metavolcanics and 6 g/t for the north metavolcanics. Minimum/maximum numbers of composites used for the estimations were set to 2/32 for the first pass searches and minimums were reduced to 1 for the second pass searches for all domains respectively. A maximum of three composites was allowed to be selected per hole for each estimate. The discretizations were set to 4 m x 4 m x 4 m, for all domains and estimations. All of these parameters were based on extensive Quantitative Kriging Neighborhood Analysis (QKNA) of the model and composite dataset.

Density factors of 2.72 were applied to the Webb Lake and Lovell Lake granodiorite stocks, based on 3,707 SG determinations of this rock type from the core specimens by Prodigy. A density factor of 2.86 was applied to the south and north metavolcanics mineralized domains based on 816 SG determinations of this rock type from the core specimens also by Prodigy.

Tetra Tech applied an Indicated Resource category to any blocks that were estimated in the first estimation passes, and an Inferred Resource category to any blocks that were estimated in the second estimation passes. Tetra Tech notes that Prodigy has an ongoing drilling program to in-fill the existing pattern. Validation of assay files against the certificates was carried out on 172 of the holes drilled by Prodigy between September 2011 and June 2012, which equates to 71% of the holes drilled in this period and 14% of the database provided as a whole. For all the

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 3 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario 1,193 assay records checked that were greater than 2 g/t there was a 100% match between the database records and the certificates. Data verification was also completed on collar coordinates, end-of-hole depths, down-hole survey measurements, from and to intervals, measurements of assay sampling intervals, and gold grades for about 35% of the database provided, and no major issues were found.

In August 2012, Tetra Tech carried out rigorous validation of the pre-1999 surface drillholes and underground drillholes (greater than 50 m), to enable them to be included in this resource estimate. A minimum of 10% of these drillholes were checked for collar co-ordinates, end-of-hole depths, down-hole survey measurements, from and to intervals, measurements of assay sampling intervals, and gold grades. Error rates were generally within acceptable parameters.

The ordinary kriged estimates were validated by comparing them with inverse distance squared (ID2) and nearest neighbour (NN) estimates, and they generally compared well.

Mineral resource estimates for the Property are reported in categories of Indicated and Inferred, in accordance with the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum (CIM) Definition Standards for Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves (CIM code) as follows:

Table 1.1 Mineral Resource Estimate for Magino – September 2012

Tonnes Au Au Class Domain (t) (g/t) (oz) Indicated Webb Lake Stock 207,268,820 0.87 5,797,550 Lovell Lake Stock 1,880,830 0.80 48,380 South Metavolcanics 12,514,080 0.85 341,990 North Metavolcanics 1,816,060 0.92 53,720 Total 223,479,790 0.87 6,250,990 Inferred Webb Lake Stock 7,803,620 0.77 193,190 Lovell Lake Stock 123,370 0.52 2,060 South Metavolcanics 5,757,820 0.85 157,350 North Metavolcanics 124,600 0.56 2,240 Total 13,809,410 0.80 355,190 Note: OK method at 0.35 g/t cut-off and does not include already mined material. In the above mineral resource table there may be inconsistencies due to rounding. Estimates are rounded since the figures are not precise calculations.

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 4 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario 1.5 RECOMMENDATIONS

1.5.1 DRILLING

Tetra Tech recommends additional drilling on the Property to investigate the down- dip extension of the current resource for the Magino mineralization, improve the understanding of the known resource, and upgrade the resource category.

The proposed budget for the drilling is budget at approximately $3.25 million.

1.5.2 PREFEASIBILITY STUDY

Tetra Tech recommends conducting a prefeasibility study to evaluate the potential economic viability of the Property, based on the February 2012 PEA and this new resource estimate. It should incorporate the following items:

• new mine plan, re-evaluating open-pit and underground methods, different throughput, set-backs, production schedules • consider potential carbon-in-pulp and heap leach options • detailed estimation of current capital costs and operating costs • proceed with economic analysis, based on the above.

The proposed budget for the prefeasibility study is approximately $2.5 million.

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 5 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario 2.0 INTRODUCTION

Prodigy is a Canadian-registered resource Issuer that was formed in 2011 from though the unification of Kodiak and Golden Goose.

Prodigy has retained Tetra Tech to estimate a new mineral resource for the Project, and disclose it in a technical report prepared in accordance with NI 43-101. This report replaces the PEA produced in February 2012 by Tetra Tech. As the new resource estimate is significantly different from the existing one, Tetra Tech does not consider the mine plan and process disclosure in the PEA to be current. As such, the current technical report does not describe the PEA in depth.

Data necessary for the execution of the resource estimation was obtained by Tetra Tech from Prodigy in mostly digital format. This included all drilling data modern and historical, and previous technical reports from Prodigy and its predecessors. These and other sources of information are documented in Section 19.0.

The primary author of this report is Mr. Patrick Huxtable, MAIG (RPGeo) who is a Professional Geologist with approximately 18 years of experience in exploration and operations, including several years working in shear-hosted lode gold deposits. Mr. Huxtable has not performed a current site visit to the Property.

Mr. Todd McCracken, P.Geo., is the author of the data verification section. Mr. McCracken is a Professional Geologist with 20 years of experience in exploration and operations, including several years working in shear-hosted lode gold deposits. Mr. McCracken visited the Property between May 8 and 9, 2012, inclusive.

Mr. Todd Kanhai, P.Eng., is the author of the mineral processing and metallurgical testing section. Mr. Kanhai is a Metallurgical Engineer with 12 years of mining and mineral processing experience on various types of studies, from PEAs through to feasibility and due diligences studies. Mr. Kanhai visited the Property on November 2, 2011.

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 6 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario 3.0 RELIANCE ON OTHER EXPERTS

Tetra Tech relied entirely on Prodigy for legal and environmental aspects of the Property. Property title is described in Section 4.2 of this report, while environmental aspects are disclosed in Section 4.3 of this report.

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 7 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario 4.0 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION

4.1 LOCATION

The Property is approximately 40 km northeast of the town of Wawa, Ontario, on the National Topography System (NTS) map sheet 42C/08 (see Figure 4.1). The Property is located in Finan Township, which falls within the Sault Ste. Marie mining district of Ontario. The Magino Mine is approximately 14 km southeast of the town of Dubreuilville. The approximate Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) coordinates for the geographic centre of the Property are 685900E, 5351800N (Zone 16, North American Datum (NAD) 83). The approximate position of the Magino Mine is 689000E, 5351000N.

Figure 4.1 Location Map of the Magino Property in Ontario

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 8 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario 4.2 STATUS OF THE M INING T ITLES

Mr. Randy Sedore acts as the Land Manager for Prodigy with regards to the exploration and mining lands that form the Property (Figure 4.2). He confirmed on December 15, 2011 that the issuer’s wholly-owned (i.e., 100% Registered ownership) land holdings forming the Property comprise seven patented mining claims (mining and surface rights), four leased mining claims, and 66 unpatented mining claims with a combined area of 5,131,180 ac (2,076.515 ha).

The four leased mining claims are contiguous and consist of seven mining titles (SSM 581948 to 581953 and SSM 722481) (Table 4.1). Golden Goose owns the mining and surface rights on these leased mining claims, except mining title SSM 722481 for which Golden Goose owns only the mining rights.

The mineralized area hosting the underground workings is located just north of Webb Lake near the southeastern corner of the Property (see Figure 4.2).

Table 4.1 Description of the Mining Title Types in Ontario

Mining Titles Associated Rights Unpatented Mining Claims Exploration for mineral substances Right to subsurface only Work required for renewal of right Leased Mining Claims 20-year period No obligation or work required Payment of annual fee Surface rights limited to mining activities Patented Mining Claims For life No obligation or work required Payment of annual fee Surface rights limited to mining activities Source: Turcotte et al. (2009)

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 9 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario Figure 4.2 Claim Map of the Magino Property

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 10 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario On November 1, 1985, an agreement was reached between Cavendish Investing Ltd. (Cavendish) and Muscocho Explorations Ltd. (Muscocho Explorations). At the time, Cavendish and McNellen Resources Inc. (McNellen Resources), formerly Rico Copper (1966) Inc. each owned a 50% interest in the Property.

The agreement stipulated that Muscocho Explorations would purchase all of Cavendish’s right, title and interest in and to the joint venture with McNellen, and that Cavendish would retain a 10% royalty of Muscocho Explorations’ share of net profits derived from its participation in the joint venture. The agreement further stipulated that if Muscocho Explorations assigns any or all part of its interest in the joint venture to another party or parties, it will cause the assignee(s) of such interest to enter into an agreement with Cavendish under which such assignee(s) will assume all of Muscocho Explorations’ obligations under the terms of the agreement, including the payment of said royalty to Cavendish.

Net profits for the purposes of the above paragraph shall mean the monies received by Muscocho Explorations from its interest in the joint venture after Cavendish has paid Muscocho Explorations for all its costs incidental to the joint venture incurred before and after the closing date of the agreement.

In 1996, three companies – Muscocho Explorations, McNellen Resources, and Flanagan McAdam Resources Inc. – combined to form Golden Goose, which emerged with a 100% interest in the Property. Golden Goose thus became an assignee of Muscocho Explorations’ obligation to pay Cavendish a 10% royalty for its share of the net profits, after reimbursement of all costs incurred by Muscocho Explorations since November 1985. Prodigy cannot reasonably estimate the likelihood of a royalty being paid, nor the amount.

On August 31, 2010, Kodiak and Golden Goose announced a definitive merger agreement and plan of arrangement dated August 30, 2010, whereby Kodiak would acquire all of the issued and outstanding shares of Golden Goose. The arrangement effectively combined the assets of both companies on a consolidated basis, with Golden Goose becoming a wholly-owned subsidiary of Kodiak.

On January 4, 2011, Prodigy announced that it was the named unification of Kodiak and Golden Goose.

On February 9, 2011, Prodigy announced that it had signed an option agreement with MPH Resources allowing Prodigy to earn up to a 100% interest in the 128 ha Gould Gold Property, adjacent to the Property. The option property is identified as numbers 4218037 and 4218038 in Figure 4.2.

Prodigy has advised that the terms of the option agreement, subject to the Toronto Stock Exchange Venture Exchange (TSXV) approval, are as follows:

• Prodigy will pay MPH Resources $10,000 and issue to MPH Resources 50,000 common shares of Prodigy following acceptance by the TSXV of this transaction.

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 11 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario • Prodigy can earn a 60% interest in the Property within two years of TSXV approval by paying MPH Resources an additional $35,000, issuing MPH Resources an additional 150,000 shares and incurring expenditures of $250,000. • Prodigy can earn a 100% interest in the Property within three years of TSXV approval by paying MPH Resources an additional $25,000 ($70,000 in aggregate), issuing MPH Resources an additional 200,000 Shares (400,000 shares in aggregate), incurring additional expenditures of $500,000 ($750,000 in aggregate) and granting MPH Resources a net smelter return (NSR) royalty of 1%, which may be repurchased for $1,000,000 • The Property is subject to an additional 2% NSR royalty held by prior owners, half of which may be acquired for $1,000,000.

4.3 ENVIRONMENTAL M ATTERS

Golden Goose retained AMEC Earth & Environmental (AMEC), a division of AMEC Americas Limited, to carry out a dam safety inspection of the tailings dams at the Magino Mine (Yong et al. 2008). The inspection was conducted in accordance with guidelines applicable to structures in Ontario, and also took into account the site’s closure plan requirements and the recommendations provided in AMEC’s previous dam safety inspection report (AMEC 2002). With the exception of some requirements for erosion protection maintenance, all three dams appeared to be in stable condition with no visible signs of distress or instability. The conditions of the dams are not expected to change because the tailings are no longer being discharged to the primary pond.

Since 1992, the site has been kept on a care and maintenance basis (temporary suspension) during which time the issuer pursued financing opportunities that could potentially lead to the resumption of mining operations. Personnel remained on-site to provide security and ensure compliance with the Certificate of Approval (#4-0115- 88-896) and other environmental requirements. In 1996, the mine was authorized to reduce sampling frequency as long as the mine was not operational. Once the mine reactivates, the frequencies specified in the Certificate of Approval must be re- implemented.

The annual toxicity sample for the Rainbow Trout 96-hour LC50 bioassay toxicity test was collected from the secondary polishing pond in June 2009.

Water was no longer being pumped from the mine, so the mine water settling pond was dry and sampling the pond was not required.

A detailed mine site characterization was completed for the Magino Mine as part of the mine closure plan. The original plan, “Magino Mine Closure Plan – Muscocho Explorations Limited”, was prepared in October 1992 by Environmental Applications Group Limited (Young and Simms 1992). It was revised in 1993 by HBT AGRA Limited (Young and Simms 1993). The mine site characterization is part of the

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 12 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario February 2003 amendment “Closure Plan – Amendment No.1, Golden Goose Resources Inc., Magino Mine Site” (Dyck and Bleiker 2003). The changes in the amendment are in accordance with the requirements laid out in Part VII of the Ontario Mining Act and have been formatted as per Ontario Regulation 240/00 and the associated Mine Rehabilitation Code of Ontario. In 2010 AMEC conducted a hydrogeological study for Golden Goose (McBride and Duckworth 2010).

On September 29, 2011, Prodigy announced that it had signed an agreement with EBA Engineering Consultants Ltd., a Tetra Tech Company (EBA) to provide environmental baseline studies at Magino.

In addition, the following will be required if mining operations resume:

• A Certificate of Authorization for Air is required under the Environmental Protection Act, Regulation 346. • A permit to take water (PTTW) is required for dewatering of the mine. • A PTTW is required from Webb Lake. • A Waste Generator Registration from the Ontario Ministry of Environment (MOE) is required for waste generated on-site such as oils, solvents, etc. • The Magino Mine is currently in temporary suspension and will remain as such until Prodigy resubmits a closure plan for the new open pit. The closure of the old mine workings will be integrated into the new open pit and the Property will emerge as an operating mine under a 2013 closure plan, Amendment #1. • A First Nations consultation must be held with any First Nations potentially affected by the Project. Such consultations would address a requirement in Ontario's mining regulations, as well as various requirements for other approvals. The Project lies within the Finan and Jacobson townships. The Michipicoten and Missanabie Creek First Nations will have to be apprised and the consultation process initiated. The Métis Nation of Ontario should also be consulted. Prodigy informed the author that negotiations with all relevant parties are being held and are progressing well.

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 13 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario 5.0 ACCESSIBILITY, CLIMATE, LOCAL RESOURCES, INFRASTRUCTURE AND PHYSIOGRAPHY

5.1 ACCESSIBILITY

The Magino Mine is located in Finan Township, approximately 40 km northeast of Wawa, Ontario. The Magino Mine can be accessed via a 14 km, all-weather gravel road (Chemin Goudreau) west of Dubreuilville (Figure 5.1), which is located on Highway 519, 30 km east of the junction of Highway 17 and Highway 519. This junction is approximately 40 km north of Wawa on Highway 17.

5.2 CLIMATE

The mean annual temperature for the area is slightly above the freezing point at 1°C. The average July temperature is 20°C and the average January temperature is -15°C. The average annual precipitation is 650 mm with rainfall highest in September, averaging 90 mm. Snow typically falls from October to May, but the peak is from November to March when the monthly average reaches 30 mm.

5.3 LOCAL R ESOURCES

The area is well serviced by mining and milling industries. The town of Dubreuilville, population 900, is the closest service community. The Island Gold Mine (operated by Richmont) is 1.5 km east of the Magino Mine, and the Eagle River Mine (Wesdome Gold Mines) is 80 km to the west. The Hemlo operations (Barrick Gold Corp.) are located approximately 150 km to the northwest. General labour and experienced workers are readily available in Wawa, Sault Ste. Marie and Thunder Bay.

5.4 INFRASTRUCTURE

The Magino Mine is also connected to the rail sidings of Lochalsh (14 km to the east, Canadian Pacific Railway) and Goudreau (7 km to the west, Algoma Central Railway) by means of a gravel road. A 44 kV power line extends from Goudreau to Lochalsh and currently services the Magino Mine. Most of the former surface buildings have been dismantled, and only the electrical and carpenter shops remain in service. The underground workings were under operation until 1993, when flooded occurring, and was sealed to prevent entry.

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 14 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario 5.5 PHYSIOGRAPHY

The Magino Mine is located in the geological Wawa Subprovince of the Canadian Shield. The topography of the area is characterized by low ridges and hills (up to 50 m of relief), flanked by generally flat areas of glacial outwash, swamps and numerous lakes and bogs.

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 15 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario Figure 5.1 Topography and Accessibility of the Magino Property

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 16 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario 6.0 HISTORY

The following account of the history of the Magino deposit is derived largely from the Snowden 2011 (Ross 2011) technical report, with some minor modifications included. A fuller description of the details of the history can be found in the Snowden 2011 technical report (Ross 2011).

6.1 1950-1999

The area around the towns of Goudreau and Lochalsh has been prospected for many years. The discovery of iron mineralized material around the turn of the 20th century in the Michipicoten area southwest of Wawa led to a search for similar deposits along the iron ranges further north. In places, the iron formations near Goudreau were found to contain pyrite in sufficient quantity to form the basis of a mining industry of considerable importance at one time. Between 1916 and 1919, about 250,000 t of pyrite were produced, but a lack of markets for sulphuric acid at the close of World War I led to the abandonment of the mines and the dismantling of the acid plants that had been erected two miles east of Goudreau.

Gold was discovered in 1918 near Goudreau, and prospecting and mining have continued since then, being particularly active from the mid-1920s to the beginning of World War II. Available records show that gold production from the Goudreau area was somewhat sporadic.

Various companies owned, operated and explored the Property between 1917 and 1981 and a summary of their activities can be found in Table 6.1.

The Property remained idle until 1981 when Rico Copper (1966) Ltd. (later renamed McNellen Resources) conducted a diamond drilling program to evaluate the depth continuity of the A-Zone and B-Zone, and the lateral continuity of the E-Zone. A total of 6,915 ft (2,107 m) was drilled in 16 holes.

McNellen Resources entered into a joint venture with Cavendish on September 25, 1981. Under the terms of the agreement, Cavendish could earn an undivided 50% interest in the Property by spending Cdn$900,000 on the Property. Work on the Property started on October 6, 1981. Surface facilities were installed and dewatering of the underground workings dewatered. Pumping started on November 26, 1981 and was completed on January 21, 1982.

Muscocho Explorations Ltd. acquired a 50% interest in the Property from Cavendish in the fall of 1985. From September to December, they carried out a surface drilling program west of the main mine workings.

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 17 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario In 1996, Golden Goose obtained the Property through an amalgamation of Muscocho Explorations, Flanagan McAdams Resources Inc. and McNellen Resources. In that same year, BLM Bharti Engineering Ltd. (BLM) conducted a property review that evaluated the potential for both underground and open-pit mining (BLM 1996).

Table 6.1 summarizes the work history for this period.

Table 6.1 Historical Summary for Magino

Year Company Work Description Results References 1917 to McCarthy-Webb • development of claim group • discovery of gold Bourne et al. 1924 Goudreau Mines • sinking of two shallow shafts 1983 Ltd. or pits • 335 m of surface diamond drilling 1925 to McCarthy-Webb • test pits and trenching - Bourne et al. 1932 Goudreau Mines • five surface DDHs 1983 Ltd. 1933 to Consolidated • diamond drilling • 421 t of Bourne et al. 1934 Mining and • construction of mill mineralized 1983 Smelting material milled Company • 144 oz of gold extracted 1935 to Algoma Summit • inclined shaft sunk at 33° • 47,785 t of Bourne et al. 1937 Gold Mines • sublevel at 100 ft (30.5 m); mineralized 1983 1st level at 176 ft (53.6 m); material milled 2nd level at 374 ft (114 m) • 2,274 oz of gold • underground diamond drilling extracted 1938 to Algoma Summit • inclined shaft sunk to 2nd level • 68,421 t of Bourne et al. 1939 Gold Mines at 374 ft (114 m) mineralized 1983 • underground diamond drilling material milled • drifting • 6,049 oz of gold extracted 1939 to Magino Gold • detailed underground • discovery of a new Bourne et al. 1942 Mines exploration program gold zone 1983 • mine closed • 309 oz of gold from clean-up of mill 1972 Mr. C. McNellen • surface diamond drilling: 6 • many new Bourne et al. DDHs (AS-72-01 to AS-72- “mineralized 1983 06) totalling 2,000 ft (610 m) material grade” intersections 1981 Rico Copper • surface diamond drilling: 16 • many new Bourne et al. (1966) Ltd DDHs (S-81-1 to S-81-16) “mineralized 1983 totaling 6,915 ft (2,107 m) material grade” intersections table continues…

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 18 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario Year Company Work Description Results References 1981 to McNellen • surfaces facilities installed • many new Bourne et al. 1982 Resources • underground workings “mineralized 1983 Cavendish dewatered and resurveyed material grade” Resources Ltd • channel sampling intersections • test hole drilling • 75 test holes totaling 1,500 ft (457 m) • surface diamond drilling: 38 DDHs (SS-1 to SS-37A) totalling 6,798 ft (2,072 m) • underground drilling: 42 DDHs (U1-1 to U1-11; U2-1 to U2-31) totalling 8,581 ft (2,615 m) 1982 McNellen • magnetic and • no electromagnetic Mongeau 1982 Resources electromagnetic surveys conductors Parbery and Cavendish Mongeau 1982 • geological survey • magnetic Resources Ltd anomalies 1983 McNellen • prefeasibility study (PFS) • project not viable Bourne et al. Resources • mineral inventory estimation 1983 Cavendish Resources Ltd 1984 McNellen • PFS • new gold-bearing Bourne 1984 Resources Inc. • mineral inventory estimation zones found Sutherland Cavendish 1987 • Prophet surface diamond drilling: 25 Resources Ltd DDHs (JJ-1 to JJ-24) totaling June Resources 5,122 ft (1,561 m) Inc. 1985 McNellen • surface diamond drilling • four mineralized Sutherland Resources • 29 DDHs (MAG-85-01 to zones outlined 1987 Muscocho MAG-85-29) totaling 16,441 ft Explorations (5,011 m) 1986 McNellen • surface diamond drilling: 64 • best drift results: Muscocho Resources DDHs (S-86-01to S-86- 55; 0.298 oz/ton over Explorations Muscocho S-86-57 to S-86-65) totaling 8.0 ft horizontal 1987 Explorations Sutherland 12,372 ft (3,771 m) width along strike 1987 DDH logs • underground diamond drilling: length of 120 ft 12 DDHs (U-86-01 to U-86- (35.50 m) 12) totaling 5,508 ft (1,679 m) • DDH S-86-014 • ramp collared intersected • underground development 0.624 oz/ton over 13.0 ft (21.38 g/t Au over 3.96 m) table continues…

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 19 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario Year Company Work Description Results References 1987 McNellen • surface diamond drilling: 92 • DDH S-87-045 DDH logs Resources DDHs (S-87-001 to S-87-079; intersected Muscocho S-87-201 to S-87-211) 0.708 oz/ton over Explorations totalling 54,359 ft (16,369 m) 14.2 ft (24.29 g/t • underground diamond drilling: Au over 4.33 m) 187 DDHs (U-87-001 to U-87- 118; U-87-120 to U-87-186) totalling 51,330 ft (15,645 m) • underground development 1988 McNellen • surface diamond drilling • DDH S-88-001 DDH logs Resources • 9 DDHs (S-88-001 to S-88- intersected Muscocho 009) totalling 54,359 ft 0.371 oz/ton over Explorations (16,369 m) 31.0 ft (12.73 g/t • underground diamond drilling: Au over 9.45 m) 213 DDHs (U-88-001 to U-88- 064; U-88-072 to U-88-151; U-88-155 to U-88-166; U-88- 171 to U-88-207; U-88-219 to U-88-232; U-88-240 to U-88- 245) totalling 57,434 ft (17,506 m) • underground development and mining work 1989 McNellen • underground diamond drilling: • DDH U-89-043 DDH logs Resources 293 DDHs (U-89-001 to U-89- intersected Muscocho 090; U-89-092 to U-89-116; 0.257 oz/ton over Explorations U-89-118 to U- 89-142; U-89- 6.0 ft (8.81 g/t Au 147 to U-89-64; U-89-168 to over 1.83 m) U-89-169; U-89-171; U-89- • DDH U-89-061 173 to U-89-176; U-89-179 to intersected U-89-188; U-89-190 to U-89- 0.244 oz/ton over 192; U-89-194 to U-89- 196; 9.4 ft (8.37 g/t Au U-89-198 to U-89-200; U-89- over 2.87 m) 204 to U-89-237; • DDH U-89-159 U-89-238 to U-89-248; U-89- intersected 251 to U-89-315) totalling 2.283 oz/ton over 53,493 ft (16,305 m) 3.4 ft (78.27 g/t Au • underground development over 1.02 m) and mining work • DDH U-89-163 intersected 0.30 oz/ton over 24.8 ft (10.29 g/t Au over 7.56 m) table continues…

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 20 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario Year Company Work Description Results References 1990 McNellen • underground diamond drilling: • DDH U-90-080 DDH logs Resources 166 DDHs (U-90-001 to U-90- intersected Muscocho 015; U-90-017 to U-90-019; 0.21 oz/ton over Explorations U-90-021 to U-90-023; U-90- 10.3 ft (7.21 g/t Au 025 to U-90-092; U-90-101 to over 3.14 m) U-90-127; U-90-129 to U-90- 178) totalling 15,178 ft (4,626 m) • underground development and mining work 1991 McNellen • underground diamond drilling: • DDH U-91-008 DDH logs Resources 13 DDHs (U-91-001 to U-91- intersected Muscocho 013) totalling 1,081 ft (329 m) 0.243 oz/ton over Explorations • underground development 9.70 ft (8.32 g/t Au and mining work over 2.96 m) 1992 McNellen • no underground and surface - Muschocho Resources diamond drilling Explorations Muscocho 1992 • underground development Explorations and mining work • the 650 ft ramp was driven to a depth of 685 ft 1988 to McNellen • mining production • 768,678 t McBride 1991 1992 Resources processed Nielsen 1995 Muscocho production of Perkins 1999 Explorations 105,543 oz of gold • 28 shrinkage stopes totalling 177,486 t with a grade of 0.217 oz/ton (38,572 oz) • 34 long-hole stopes totaling 371,285 t with a grade of 0.118 oz/ton (43,938 oz) • three combined long-hole and shrinkage stopes totaling 53,766 t with a grade of 0.177 oz/ton (9,534 oz) 1995 McNellen • technical review of the - Nielsen 1995 Resources Magino Mine property Muscocho Explorations table continues…

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 21 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario Year Company Work Description Results References 1996 Golden Goose • acquisition of Magino Mine - BLM 1996 • evaluation of potential for Reddick 1996a Reddick 1996b both underground and open- pit mining 1997 Golden Goose • check sampling program • DDH S-97-05 Nielsen 1997 • geochemical study for surface intersected Perkins 1997 PHA 1997 exploration 18.57 g/t Au over Hall et al. 1997 • 7.00 m induced polarization (IP) Wilson 1997 survey of Webb Lake BLM 1997 granodiorite Analytical • surface diamond drilling Solutions Ltd 1997 • 10 DDHs (S-97-01 to S-97- Reddick 1999 10) totaling 2,087 m Perkins 1999 • stripping, mapping and Reddick 2000 channel sampling • structural study • creation of a digital database in Gemcom software • creation of a block model for resource evaluation • scoping study 1998 to Golden Goose • two bulk samples for • Average head Reddick 1999 1999 metallurgical test work grade was 0.88 g/t Perkins 1999 for mafic volcanics and 0.96 g/t for the granodiorite Source: Modified after Ross (2011)

6.2 2000-2010 GOLDEN G OOSE

6.2.1 2000

ADDITIONAL SAMPLING

In May of 2000, F. W. Nielsen of Golden Goose asked Reddick Consulting Inc. (Reddick) to carry out a program that would assist their re-evaluation of the Property. There were two separate components to the work. The first was a review of the digital DDH database to determine where un-sampled and/or missing core occurred in the central part of deposit. This was followed by retrieving the archived core for those intervals and having them assayed to determine background gold levels for un- sampled lengths of core.

DRILLING

The second component involved the drilling of 19 large diameter DDHs (HQ diameter) in the central part of the deposit to:

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 22 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario • assist with grade determination in areas subject to underground mining • provide new baseline data to aid with grade reconciliation • determine if there was variability in assay data as a function of sample size.

Dominik Drilling of Timmins, Ontario, was awarded the drill contract in 2000. Drilling ran from September 30 to October 18 (Reddick 2001a). A total of 1,231 m was drilled, producing 1,196 m of recovered core. The core was logged and sampled on- site. Drill collars were located by clearing out and re-chaining the parts of the grid lines that had been turned off the surveyed baseline established by Golden Goose in 1996. All drill cores from this program core is stored in tagged core boxes at the mine site. The 2000 drill program was designed to test the central part of the Property to help reconcile grade estimates in the main mine area where stoping has removed some of the mineralization. There were two main considerations in designing the 2000 drill program. Firstly, in order to provide an even spatial distribution of samples, the holes were laid out in the most regular pattern possible. Secondly, only large diameter holes (HQ) were drilled and only one quarter of the core was archived to obtain the most representative samples possible.

SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL

In 2000, Golden Goose randomly inserted diabase samples in the shipped samples as blanks. In addition, Swastika Laboratories reported on their internal blanks, which they use for their own quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) purposes. To determine the variation introduced by sub sampling, every 25th sample had a check assay done on the original pulp and a second pulp was split from the coarse reject fraction for a third assay. Swastika Laboratories also performed many additional random checks. Golden Goose did not insert any standards. None of the samples assayed by Swastika Laboratories were sent for independent verification at another laboratory (Reddick 2001b).

A total of 1,231 m was drilled. The results of the 2000 drilling program, as well as the re-sampling program, helped to establish a mean grade of 0.015 oz/ton gold for un- sampled core from the central 1,000 ft (305 m) of the deposit. It also provided information on the existence of a significant percentage of granodiorite in the main part of the deposit at a grade considered sufficient for a low-grade, large-tonnage mining operation (0.06 to 0.10 oz/ton).

6.2.2 2001

In 2001, Reddick re-evaluated the variography and interpolation techniques to produce a revised resource estimate based on the inclusion of data obtained in 2000. Taking into account past production, the total Measured Resource when applying a cut-off grade of 0.05 oz/ton was estimated at approximately 5.8 Mt at a grade of 0.09 oz/ton gold. These resources were estimated for an open-pit operation.

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 23 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario The current author considers the preceding historical estimate to be relevant and reliable. The estimate uses the “Measured” CIM resource category.

This historic estimate would require a verification program of drillhole twinning, and re-sampling to upgrade or verify the historical estimate as a current mineral resource. A QP has not done sufficient work to classify the historical estimate as a current mineral resource and the issuer is not treating the historical estimate as current.

6.2.3 2002

DRILLING

In 2002, Golden Goose conducted a 17-hole diamond drilling program (2,743 m) under the supervision of Reddick. The holes were mostly drilled west of the mine area and did not identify significant mineralization.

Dominik Drilling of Timmins, Ontario, was awarded the drill contract in 2002. Drilling ran from May 12 to June 12, 2002 (Reddick 2002). A total of 2,743 m was drilled with 2,508 m of core recovered. Drill collars were located on the grid established by Golden Goose in 1996 and 1997. The core was logged and sampled on the site. All drill cores from this program are stored in tagged core boxes at the mine site. The 2002 drill program tested targets along the gold trend in the mine area; these targets were in the vicinity of anomalous results obtained during earlier drilling of the Lovell Lake and North Plug Granodiorite intrusions, and the previously undrilled Southern Granodiorite. The best mineralization from the 2002 drilling program was in DDHs near the mine area.

SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL

In 2002, Golden Goose inserted 17 diabase samples in the shipped samples as blanks. As in 2000, Swastika Laboratories reported their internal blanks. Check assays were performed on random pulps, as were checks of a second pulp split from the coarse reject fraction. None of the assayed samples were sent for independent verification at another laboratory (Reddick 2002).

6.2.4 2004

In 2004, a NI 43-101 technical report by Snowden and Reddick reviewed the 2001 block model resource estimate to determine its suitability for use in scoping studies involving pit optimization (Burns and Reddick 2004). Reddick concluded that for a potential open pit mine based on a cut-off grade of 0.04 oz/ton, the 2004 combined Measured and Indicated Mineral Resource at the Magino Mine was 7.295 Mt grading 0.075 oz/ton gold after subtracting historical production.

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 24 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario The current author considers the preceding historical estimate to be relevant and reliable. The estimate uses the “Measured” and “Indicated” CIM resource categories.

This historic estimate would require a verification programme of drill hole twinning, and re-sampling to upgrade or verify the historical estimate as a current mineral resource. A QP has not done sufficient work to classify the historical estimate as a current mineral resource and the issuer is not treating the historical estimate as current.

6.2.5 2006

DRILLING

In 2006, 18 NQ DDHs were completed for a total of 8,055 m. The holes identified a very robust system of gold mineralization with numerous intersections greater than 100 g/t gold, and clearly demonstrated the down-dip continuity of the mineralization, which remained open at depth and along strike. The deepest intersection of the diamond drill program was 440 m below surface (Hole 06-12), and mineralization was still open.

The 2006 drill contract was awarded to Bradley Brothers Drilling of Rouyn-Noranda, Québec. Drilling ran from February 9 to April 11, producing 11 NQ DDHs totaling 4,802 m. Another four holes totaling 1,866 m were drilled from June 9 to July 1.

Three other holes totaling 1,387 m were drilled from November 23 to December 12. The core was logged and sampled at the mine site. All drill core from this program is stored in tagged core boxes at the mine site. The 2006 drilling program was designed to target mineralization below historical workings from a depth of 130 to 400 m below surface and within the range of a future extended decline access.

SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL

In 2006, the Golden Goose QA/QC program consisted of 189 un-mineralized mafic volcanic samples inserted as blanks to check for cross-contamination. In addition, 177 core duplicates were assayed at ALS Chemex Ltd. (ALS Chemex) in Thunder Bay to monitor sample variability. Golden Goose did not insert any standards. A selection of 115 master pulps were sent to a secondary laboratory (Swastika Laboratories) for check assays (Waldie 2006). For the assay range from 0 to 100 g/t gold, the correlation coefficient was 0.983.

From 1997 to 2006, Golden Goose did not detect any significant variation between subsamples.

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 25 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario ANALYTICAL LABORATORY

In 2006 core samples were sent to the ALS Chemex laboratory at Thunder Bay, Ontario. The sample preparation process was as follows:

• sample log-in • received sample weighing • crush with 90% passing 2 mm • crushing – quality control test • split sample with riffle splitter • pulverize 1,000 g to 85% passing 75 • pulverizing – quality control test.

Gold analysis conformed to Code Au-AA24 with a 50 g charge for fire assay followed by atomic absorption (AA) finish. “Mineralized material” grade results were re- assayed according to Code Au-AA26.

6.2.6 2007

DRILLING

Golden Goose drilled 14 NQ DDHs on the Property for a total of 9,239 m. The drilling program was originally designed to outline and extend multiple known gold zones from 150 to 400 m below surface, below the historical Magino Mine workings.

Bradley Brothers Drilling was awarded the drill contract in 2007. Drilling ran from January 6 to December 17. Fourteen NQ DDHs were completed totaling 9,836 m. The core was logged and sampled at the mine site. All drill cores from this program is stored in tagged core boxes at the mine site. The 14 DDHs identified a gold system with numerous intersections and clearly demonstrated the continuity of the mineralization, which remains open at depth and along strike.

SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL

In 2007, samples were assayed at Accurassay Laboratories Ltd. (Accurassay) in Thunder Bay, Ontario. Golden Goose did not establish a QA/QC protocol for samples from the 2007 drilling program, nor did the company double-check the results using a second laboratory. Independent consultants InnovExplo of Val-d'Or, Québec asked Golden Goose to send assayed samples for independent verification at ALS Chemex in Thunder Bay, Ontario. In all, 363 pulps from the 2007 program were sent, and InnovExplo’s analysis of the results from this second laboratory revealed no bias in the original data obtained from Accurassay.

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 26 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario 6.2.7 2008

RESOURCE ESTIMATE

In 2008, InnovExplo completed a mineral resource estimate for the Magino Mine below the old mine workings (i.e., below the 650 m level) that was published as a NI 43-101 technical report (Turcotte and Pelletier 2008). Specifically, InnovExplo’s mandate was to prepare a resource estimate from a depth of 200 to 600 m. The resulting resource was classified as Inferred as per CIM standards and guidelines for reporting mineral resources and reserves. The total estimated Inferred Resources were 3,755,600 t grading 5.94 g/t gold for a total of 717,227 oz of gold (cut-off at 3 g/t gold). The highlight of this resource estimate was the addition of a large portion of Inferred Resources below the old workings of the Magino Mine (i.e., below the 650 m level). This upgrade was possibly due to the results from the 2006-2007 diamond drilling program, the most recent drill program at that time. This additional information increased the number of mineralized zones.

The current author considers the preceding historical estimate to be relevant and reliable. The estimate uses the “Inferred” CIM resource category.

This historic estimate would require a verification programme of drill hole twinning, and re-sampling to upgrade or verify the historical estimate as a current mineral resource. A QP has not done sufficient work to classify the historical estimate as a current mineral resource and the issuer is not treating the historical estimate as current.

EXPLORATION POTENTIAL

InnovExplo also performed an exhaustive compilation of the entire Property to identify new regional exploration targets for diamond drilling and stripping. It was concluded that there is potential for gold mineralization in granodiorite, gabbro/diorite and volcanic rocks throughout the Property. InnovExplo constructed a geological compilation map showing all historical exploration work on the Property. The compilation work encompassed all previous geological mapping, trenching, diamond drilling, surface sampling, geophysical surveying, geochemical surveying, etc., and all historical mineral occurrences.

SURFACE SAMPLING

In July 2008, Golden Goose carried out stripping and channel sampling in the vicinity of the southern contact of the Webb Lake granodiorite stock and adjacent volcanic rocks (Golden Goose news release dated October 28, 2008). The stripped area lays over the old mine workings and consists of seven small stripping’s totaling 2,790 m2. The purpose of the work was to enhance the understanding of structural controls on gold deposition. A total of 78 channel samples were collected from the stripped areas. The best results for the stripping and channel sampling program were: 19.85 g/t gold over 0.5 m, and 17.59 g/t gold over 1.0 m.

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 27 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario 6.2.8 2009

GEOCHEMISTRY AND GEOPHYSICAL SURVEYS

In 2009, Gestion Aline Leclerc Inc. of Val-d’Or, Québec, performed a geochemical field survey from September 18 to 21, 2009. A total of 661 humus samples were collected and assayed for gold and 48 other elements. Two grids were established with lines spaced 100 m apart. Grid locations were established with a hand-held global positioning system (GPS). One sample was collected every 25 m. That same autumn, D/C Géophysique of Val d’Or, Québec, carried out a ground magnetic survey from September 26 to October 10, 2009. A total of 75 km was surveyed on a grid of 42 lines spaced 50 m apart.

RESOURCE ESTIMATE

InnovExplo reported that the Magino Mine has Measured and Indicated Resources of 2,091,900 t grading 6.74 g/t gold for a total of 453,189 oz. Total Inferred Resources were reported as 5,828,800 tons grading 6.29 g/t gold for a total of 1,178,124 oz at a cut-off grade of 3.0 g/t gold, as published in a technical report in compliance with NI 43-101 and Form 43-101F1 (Turcotte and Pelletier 2009).

The current author considers the preceding historical estimate to be relevant and reliable. The estimate uses the “Measured”, “Indicated” and Inferred” CIM resource categories.

This historic estimate would require a verification programme of drill hole twinning, and re-sampling to upgrade or verify the historical estimate as a current mineral resource. A QP has not done sufficient work to classify the historical estimate as a current mineral resource and the issuer is not treating the historical estimate as current.

6.2.9 2010

DRILLING

From November 15, 2009 to March 1, 2010, Golden Goose conducted a 14-hole diamond drilling program totaling 4,012 m. Most of the holes were drilled in volcanic rocks south of the mine area and succeeded in identifying some significant gold mineralization.

Bradley Brothers Drilling was awarded the drill contract in 2009-2010. Drilling ran from November 15, 2009 to March 30, 2010. Fourteen NQ DDHs were completed totaling 4,012 m. The core was logged and sampled at the mine site.

All drill core from this program is stored in tagged core boxes at the mine site. The overall objective of the 2009-2010 drilling program was to discover new mineralized zones in volcanic rocks on the Property, south of the mine area. The 14 DDHs

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 28 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario identified some gold intersections and clearly demonstrated the possibility of increasing the gold resources in the volcanic rocks south of the mine area, which remain open at depth and along strike.

SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL

A QA/QC control program was active during the Golden Goose 2009-2010 diamond drilling program on the Property. The objectives of the QA/QC program were to monitor and document the quality and integrity of the sampling procedure, sample preparation, and assaying. Using a series of quality control samples, Golden Goose’s protocol stipulates that the entire sampling, sample preparation and assaying process be monitored and evaluated for:

• The integrity of field sampling and sample shipment by monitoring field blank results and sample shipment procedures. • The possible contamination during sample preparation or the assaying process by monitoring the results of field blank standards submitted as regular samples, and by monitoring laboratory analytical blank standard results. • The suitability of crushing/splitting/pulverization sizes by measuring the precision of coarse and pulp duplicate samples. • The level of assaying accuracy by using external and internal (laboratory) certified reference standards and by assaying blind certified reference standards in each batch of samples.

The laboratory inserted one coarse crush duplicate sample split, selected at random, into each 10-sample sub-batch. Three certified reference materials (CRMs) with different grades, all from Rocklabs in New Zealand, were used for QA/QC. One field blank standard was prepared using “barren” rock from the Project site, or other potentially “barren” material. One of the three CRMs, or one blank, was included in each batch of 50 samples shipped by the Golden Goose geologist.

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 29 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario 7.0 GEOLOGICAL SETTING AND MINERALIZATION

7.1 THE A RCHEAN S UPERIOR P ROVINCE

The Archean Superior Craton forms the core of the North American continent and is surrounded and truncated on all sides by Proterozoic orogens, the collisional zones along which elements of the Precambrian Canadian Shield were amalgamated (Hoffman, 1988 and 1989). The Superior Province represents 2 Mkm2 of this craton that is free of significant post-Archean cover rocks and deformation (Card and Poulsen 1998). Tectonic stability has prevailed since circa 2.6 Ga in large parts of the Superior Province (Percival 2007). The rocks of this Province are mainly Mesoarchean and Neo-archean in age and have been significantly affected by post- Archean deformation only along the boundaries marked by Proterozoic orogens, such as the Trans-Hudson and Grenville orogens, or along major internal fault zones, such as the Kapuskasing Structural Zone. The rest of the Superior Province has remained stable since the end of the Archean (Goodwin et al. 1972).

Proterozoic and younger activity is limited to rifting along the margins, emplacement of numerous mafic dyke swarms (Buchan and Ernst 2004), compressional reactivation, and large scale rotation at circa 1.9 Ga, and failed rifting at circa 1.1 Ga. With the exception of the northwest and northeast Superior margins that were pervasively deformed and metamorphosed at 1.9 to 1.8 Ga, the craton has escaped ductile deformation. A first order feature of the Superior Province is its linear subprovinces of distinctive lithological and structural character, accentuated by subparallel boundary faults (e.g. Card and Ciesielski 1986). Trends in the Superior Province are generally easterly in the south, westerly to north-westerly in the northwest, and north-westerly in the northeast (Figure 7.1). The southern Superior Province (to latitude 52° north) is a major source of mineral wealth. Owing to its potential for base metals, gold and other commodities, the Superior Province continues to attract mineral exploration in both established and frontier regions.

7.2 THE W AWA S UBPROVINCE

The Magino property is located in the Wawa Subprovince (Figure 7.2). Most geologists accept a correlation between the Wawa and Abitibi terrane’s across the transverse Kapuskasing uplift (Percival 2007). Volcanism appears to have begun with the 2.89 to 2.88 Ga Hawk assemblages. The 2.745 Ga Wawa assemblage and the 2.72 Ga Greenwater and Manitouwadge assemblages reflect oceanic settings. Volcanogenic massive sulphide deposits in the Wawa terrane have similar ages of 2.72 Ga (Corfu and Stott 1986; Williams et al. 1991; Sage et al. 1996a and b). Polat and Kerrich (1999) reported a variety of oceanic magma types from the Schreiber belt and interpreted the belt as a tectonic mélange (Polat et al. 1998; Polat and

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 30 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario Kerrich 1999 and 2001). Relatively late-stage volcanism at circa 2.695 Ga (Carfish assemblage) took place during D1 thrusting. Subsequent calc-alkalic to alkali magmatism (circa 2.689 Ga; Corfu and Stott 1996) and associated coarse clastic sedimentation (less than 2.689 Ga) was followed by the emplacement of sanukitoid plutons (2.685 to 2.68 Ga) and dextral transpressive D2 deformation.

Figure 7.1 Tectonic Subdivisions of the Superior Province of Northern Ontario

Source: Stott et al. 2007

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 31 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario Figure 7.2 Major Geological Elements of the Eastern Wawa Subprovince

Source: Card and Poulsen 1998

Mineralization occurs in two main regions: the Michipicoten-Mishubishu belt in the Wawa area and the Shebandowan-Schreiber belt to the west (Percival 2007). The Michipicoten-Mishubishu belt contains mainly iron and gold deposits with some nickel and copper-vein deposits (Figure 7.3). Iron deposits are in oxide-, sulphide- and carbonate-facies iron formations that lie stratigraphically above the 2.74 to 2.735 Ga Wawa assemblages. Gold deposits in this region occur within veins associated with shear zones in plutonic rocks of variable composition and age.

The Shebandowan-Schreiber belt hosts important deposits of gold, iron and base metals (volcanic-hosted massive sulphide deposits; e.g. Manitouwadge) (Peterson and Zaleski 1999; Zaleski et al. 1999), as well as intrusion-hosted nickel deposits. The most significant is the Hemlo gold camp, a large disseminated deposit (Muir 2003) in a strongly deformed, circa 2.693 to 2.685 Ga volcano-sedimentary sequence (Davis and Lin 2003). Gold was deposited during D2 sinistral wrench deformation between 2.680 and 2.677 Ga, likely from fluids derived from granitoid rocks.

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 32 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario Figure 7.3 Mineral Belts in the Michipicoten-Shebandowan Region of the Wawa Subprovince

Source: Card and Poulsen 1998

7.3 THE M ICHIPICOTEN G REENSTONE B ELT

The Magino Mine is located within the Michipicoten greenstone belt (Figure 7.2 and Figure 7.3). This belt, including the adjacent Gamitagama and Mishubishu greenstone belts, is one of the key localities with respect to the Superior Province (Wawa Subprovince) geology, partly because of the importance of its Algoma-type iron formations, partly because many important concepts of greenstone belt geology are based there, and partly because it contains a record of volcanism, sedimentation and plutonism that spans at least 240 Ma of Archean time (Card and Poulsen 1998).

The Michipicoten greenstone belt is a structurally and stratigraphically complex assemblage of volcanic, sedimentary and intrusive rocks that were metamorphosed to greenschist and amphibolite facies (Attoh 1981; Williams et al. 1991). To the east and south, the Michipicoten greenstone belt and satellite Gamitagama greenstone belt are bounded by plutonic rocks of the Wawa gneiss domain, mainly tonalite gneiss with abundant granitic intrusions (Card and Poulsen 1998). The northeastern Wawa Subprovince consists of similar gneissic and plutonic rocks along with the small Saganash Lake and Kabinakagami Lake greenstone belts. At the eastern edge of the Michipicoten greenstone belt, a Meso-archean sequence (Cycle 1) of basalt and komatiite, overlain by calc-alkaline tuff, is intruded by the 2888 Ma Hawk granite and 2881 Ma felsic sills (Sage 1994; Card and Poulsen 1998). This sequence is in contact with 2747 Ma tonalite gneiss cut by 2698 Ma intrusions of the

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 33 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario Whitefish Lake batholith. The Meso-archean rocks may represent a basement to the younger volcanic succession (Jackson and Sutcliffe, 1990). The Meso-archean and Neo-archean supracrustal rocks form at least three mafic-felsic cycles with intercalated sediments, notably the thick Helen iron formation that caps the lower cycle and consists of a lower siderite member, a middle pyritic carbonate member, and upper chert-carbonate and black-shale members (Goodwin 1962; Sage 1987; Sage 1994). Cycle 2 is a 2749 to 2746 Ma and 2729 Ma sequence consisting of tholeiitic basalt and andesite overlain by calc-alkaline dacite and rhyolite (Sage 1994; Card and Poulsen 1998). The upper volcanic cycle (Cycle 3), which is separated from the lower cycles by the Doré conglomerate containing tonalite clasts as young as 2698 Ma, consists of tholeiitic basalt with minor komatiite, capped by 2701 to 2691 Ma calc-alkaline felsic volcanic and clastic sedimentary rocks that include wacke, arkose, polymictic conglomerate and oligomictic quartz conglomerate (Sage 1994; Card and Poulsen 1998). Detrital zircons from the sedimentary rocks are as young as 2680 Ma (Corfu and Sage 1992), demonstrating that these sediments, like similar sequences in the Abitibi greenstone belt, were deposited following major volcanism. The petrography of the wacke units indicates that they were derived from bimodal mafic-felsic volcanic sequences (Ayres 1983).

Several suites of plutonic rocks ranging in composition from gabbro to monzogranite and syenite occur in and around the Michipicoten greenstone belt. Early tonalite, trondhjemite and granodiorite plutons with ages of 2747 to 2737 Ma, 2729 to 2721 Ma and 2698 to 2693 Ma, respectively – similar to the ages of the main volcanic cycles – are probably syn volcanic and have characteristics consistent with derivation from melting of basaltic sources (Card and Poulsen 1998).

The rocks of the Michipicoten and Gamitagama greenstone belts have been repeatedly deformed and metamorphosed under low-pressure, greenschist to lower amphibolite facies conditions (Ayres 1969, 1983; Studemeister, 1983; McGill and Shrady 1986; Arias and Helmstaedt 1990; McGill 1992; Sage 1993 and 1994). Early structures include major recumbent folds, thrusts and associated cleavages (Card and Poulsen 1998). Later superimposed upright folds are accompanied by steep cleavages. The latest structures include northeast-trending shear zones that host auriferous vein systems (Heather 1989) and northerly-trending sinistral faults.

The Michipicoten-Mishubishu mineral belt is dominated by iron and gold deposits (Figure 7.3); lesser prospects include nickel sulphide and copper-vein deposits. Iron formation deposits are widely distributed in this region. Gold deposits also typify the Michipicoten-Mishubishu mineral belt. Most of these occur in a linear zone extending west-southwest from Renabie in the east, through the Goudreau-Lochalsh area, to Mishubishu Lake. Although the gold deposits of this area occur in a terrane with extensive iron formations, they display a remarkable association with altered shear zones and plutonic rocks regardless of composition or age (Studemeister, 1985; Studemeister and Kilias 1987; Heather and Arias 1987 and 1992).

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 34 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario 7.4 THE G EOLOGY OF THE M AGINO M INE A REA

The Magino Mine is situated in the Goudreau-Lochalsh gold district of the Wawa gold camp. The geology of the Goudreau-Lochalsh gold district has been mapped by Sage and published over a ten-year period (Sage 1983, 1984, 1985, 1987a, 1993, 1993a, 1993b, 1993c and 1993d). Supracrustal rocks in the Goudreau-Lochalsh district consist of Cycle 2 felsic to intermediate pyroclastic metavolcanics capped by pyrite-bearing ironstone. To the north are pillowed, massive and schistose, mafic to intermediate metavolcanics and minor intercalations of Cycle 3 mafic pyroclastic rock. Several medium- to coarse-grained quartz dioritic to dioritic sills and/or dikes intrude all metavolcanic rocks.

Gold mineralization at the Magino mine is dominantly hosted by the Webb Lake Stock (Deevy 1994), which intrudes isoclinally folded Cycle 3 mafic volcanic rocks (Sage 1993). The Webb Lake Stock is a felsic intrusion interpreted by Sage (1993, 1994) as a trondhjemite, but continues to be called a granodiorite in mine terminology and by mine geologists.

Subsequently the Lovell Lake Stock of granodiorite (trondhjemite) and the South Metavolcanics have been found to contain significant gold mineralisation too.

The long axis of the Webb Lake stock is parallel to the regional supracrustal rock stratigraphy (Sage 1993; 1994). The Webb Lake stock is east-north-east-striking and has a steep northerly dip (Deevy 1992 and 1994). Its surface expression is at least 1,800 m long and up to 300 m wide. The aureole rocks of the Webb Lake stock are predominately mafic volcanic rocks (Deevy 1992 and 1994). The southern contact is quite linear and regular, consisting mostly of dark green mafic rocks. The northern contact is quite irregular and there is interfingering of granodiorite (trondhjemite) and aureole rocks. The granodiorite (trondhjemite) is medium- to coarse-grained, green-grey, moderately hard, non-magnetic and massive (Sutherland 1987). It is locally foliated and hydrothermally altered, and has been affected by greenschist facies metamorphism. The granodiorite (trondhjemite) contains 5 to 10% veins of carbonate, quartz, tourmaline and pyrite in various orientations. Approximately 5% of the igneous rock contains healed faults and fractures, generally filled with chlorite and carbonate. They may correspond to the late, north trending, 45°-dipping, carbonate-filled faults observed underground (Sutherland 1987).

Some lithologies occur within the granodiorite. In mine terminology, these are “felsites”, “mafics” and “intermediates” (Deevy 1992 and 1994). “Grey felsite” is the oldest of the three and possibly predates gold mineralization. It is predominately a medium to dark grey aphanitic body about 0.30 to 1.20 m thick that can be traced from one end of the mine to the other. Grey felsite may not in fact be an intrusive in its own right, but rather cataclastized granodiorite (trondhjemite) (Deevy 1992). “Pink felsite” and “brown felsite” postdate gold mineralization. They are both fine grained rocks of quartz-feldspar porphyry composition. They vary from a few centimeters to 3.5 m wide and can be traced for 100 m or more both laterally and vertically.

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 35 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario The “mafics” may be either dykes or xenoliths. They are dark green in color, generally strongly foliated, and are of similar composition to the aureole mafic rocks (Deevy 1992 and 1994). These mafic rafts or dykes are up to 6 m wide (Bourne et al. 1987). The “intermediates” are much more limited in extent and have the texture of a crystal tuff. They are probably true xenoliths within the granodiorite. Both the mafic and intermediate xenoliths/dykes pre-date gold mineralization (Deevy 1992 and 1994) (see Figure 7.4).

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 36 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario Figure 7.4 Geology of the Magino Mine Area

Source: Sage 1993d

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 37 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario Several diabase dykes up to 12 m wide, of probable Keweenawan age, strike north- north west and cut all rock types (Bourne et al. 1987). Diamond drilling east of the diabase dyke marking the eastern limit of underground workings in the “old mine” indicates that the granodiorite (trondhjemite)-metavolcanic contact has been offset by approximately 50 ft (15 m), and that the dip of the contact at this location is vertical instead of 65° to the north as is found west of the dyke. Bourne et al. (1987) believe the diabase dyke intruded a pre-existing fault zone along which movement was mainly rotational in nature (sinistral displacement), which would explain both the apparent horizontal offset and the marked change in dip. The horizontal distance between mineralized zones across this structure exceeds that shown for the displacement of the stock’s margins on mine plans (Nielsen 1997). This suggests that if displacement entirely post-dates mineralization, it must have been oblique, or alternatively, the zones on either side of the diabase are not related (Nielsen 1997).

The granodiorite (trondhjemite) intrusion is cut by numerous shear zones related to the Goudreau Lake Deformation Zone and it is on these shear-hosted gold-bearing quartz veins that the Magino Mine occurs (Sage 1994). The portion of the intrusion north of the deformation zone hosts the gold mineralization and is more deformed than the southern portion. The Goudreau Lake Deformation Zone is a major contact between Cycle 2 to the south and Cycle 3 to the north. In the Magino Mine area, the Goudreau Lake Deformation Zone consists of a 070°-striking, ductile-brittle zone sub-parallel to dextral oblique-slip high-strain zones developed within strongly altered and deformed, felsic to intermediate metavolcanic rocks (Heather and Arias 1992).

7.5 GOLD M INERALIZATION

Gold mineralization at the Magino gold mine occurs primarily within the Webb Lake and Lovell Lake granodiorite (trondhjemite) stocks. The Webb Lake and Lovell Lake stocks underwent variable metasomatic alteration during deformation and gold mineralization (Heather and Arias 1992). Distinct haloes of quartz-sericite-pyrite with minor iron-carbonate and hematite alteration are observed adjacent to the quartz vein systems. Alteration of the Webb Lake stock outside the gold-bearing zones is manifested by a chlorite-albite- quartz-tourmaline-calcite assemblage (Heather and Arias 1992). Locally present within the stock are lenticular chlorite-schist zones that represent either strongly foliated mafic metavolcanic xenoliths or a chlorite-altered felsic intrusion (Heather and Arias 1992). In addition narrow zones of mineralization have also been identified in the Southern met-volcanics, south of the Webb Lake stock.

Gold mineralization occurs in several sub-parallel high-strain zones striking 070° to 080° within the Webb Lake and Lovell Lake stocks and within mafic metavolcanic rocks immediately along the northern margin of the stock (Heather and Arias, 1992). Deevy (1992 and 1994) distinguished and described two types of mineralized material shoots, namely “zones” and “veins”. The “zones” are usually 2 to 4.5 m wide and have a strike length of 25 to 70 m. They consist of foliated, bleached and silica-flooded granodiorite (trondhjemite). The zones are folded in places, which produces mineable widths of up to 10.5 m. The “zones” dip at about the same angle

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 38 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario as the foliation and have a vertical plunge. The vertical continuity of the “zones” is at a vertical to horizontal ratio of 2.5:1 (Deevy 1994). Weak bleaching and silica flooding are the distinguishing features of the “zones” (Deevy 1994). Silica flooding consists of incipient pale gray quartz replacing the foliated granodiorite. Gold content is directly related to the amount of silica flooding (Deevy 1994).

The “veins” consist of discrete pale grey to pale green to almost white quartz veins varying in width from a few to 45 cm. They have a strike length of several to 35 m. Gold values are distributed erratically within the veins, but overall grades are quite high. The veins are folded in places, with gold concentrated in the fold noses (Deevy 1992 and 1994). Vertical continuity of the “veins” is similar to that of the “zones”, and the plunge is also vertical.

Native gold occurs in zones of pervasive silicification and in narrow (i.e. less than 1 to 20 cm wide) quartz veins that form complex systems 1 to 3 m wide. Gold occurs within both quartz veins and foliated and altered wall rocks, but the better gold grades are in the veins (T. Deevy, Magino mine geologist 2001, pers. comm., as cited in Heather and Arias 1992). Finely disseminated leaf-like visible gold was observed in numerous quartz veins in diamond drill cores and in drift backs on the second level (Koskitalo 1983). The gold tends to form plates or leaves along fractures in quartz rather than coarse nuggets. The quartz hosting the gold tends to be fine-grained and dull milky grey (Koskitalo 1983). Up to 10% disseminated pyrite is also present, most commonly found in alteration haloes around the gold-bearing quartz veins (Heather and Arias 1992) (see Figure 7.5).

Figure 7.5 Historical G Zone in the 24+75E Drift

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 39 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario The granodiorite (trondhjemite) is sericitized, carbonatized, silicified and chloritized. Gold bearing quartz veins have diffuse boundaries. Figure 7.6 shows the photographed area is 50 cm across (from Sutherland 1987).

Figure 7.6 Gold Bearing Veins on the Face of the 23+80E Drift

Note: The vein spacing and sericite alteration selvage along the vein contact. Centre vein is 15 cm wide (from Sutherland 1987).

7.6 STRUCTURES A SSOCIATED WITH G OLD M INERALIZATION

There is a strong structural control on the gold-bearing quartz vein system within the Webb Lake Stock. The system consists of several main 070°- to 075°-striking high strain zones, which in turn consist of subsidiary, parallel 070°- to 075°-striking mineralized zones (Heather and Aria 1992). The zones are also parallel to the regional schistosity in this area, which strikes 070°. Individual quartz veins are localized within narrow, secondary, brittle-ductile shear fractures with the following documented attitudes and apparent horizontal displacements (Heather and Arias 1992):

• 080° to 090° / 65°N, ductile, dextral (oblique-slip) • 045° to 055° / 70°N, ductile (?).

A strongly developed foliation defined by elongated feldspar and aligned sericite has been observed wrapping asymptotically into the narrow shear fractures (Heather and Arias 1992). These shear-fractures appear to splay off each other, with the 085° set being dominant. Surface outcrops show no obvious cross-cutting relationships

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 40 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario between these two sets of shear-fractures, suggesting synchronous development (Heather and Arias 1992). Underground, however, it was reported by Magino’s mine geologist T. Deevy, that the 055° set is part of a conjugate set of post-mineralized material faults (1991 pers. comm. cited in Heather and Arias 1992). Locally, the veins are better developed within the 085°-striking fracture set than in the 055° set. Some of the auriferous high-strain zones comprise two or more obliquely-oriented auriferous vein structures (e.g., the 070° striking high-strain zone containing 085°- and 050°-striking veins) (Heather and Arias 1992).

Underground at the Magino Mine, mine geologist T. Deevy noted that raise-mining on a single quartz vein structure revealed that the vein rolls from a dip of 80 to 60° and back to 80° over a vertical distance of roughly 15 m. Mr. Deevy also noted that the best gold grades are found at the intersections between vein-bearing shear fractures with different orientations (1987 pers. comm. cited in Heather and Arias 1992). The plunge of the Magino mineralization is sub-vertical and parallel to measured elongation lineation’s defined by stretched feldspar crystals (Heather and Arias 1992).

The brittle-ductile shear fractures and associated veins are consistently off-set by a few centimeters along brittle fractures with the following attitudes and apparent horizontal displacements (Heather and Arias 1992):

• 190° (010°) / 85°W, brittle, sinistral • 310° (130°) 67°N, brittle, dextral.

North-striking late tourmaline-quartz veins cut both the Webb Lake Stock and aforementioned gold-bearing quartz vein systems (Heather and Arias 1992). Zones of intense tourmaline-quartz fracture-filling, flooding and brecciation are locally present within the Webb Lake Stock. This late tourmaline-quartz mineralization uses the pre-existing fracture network in the rock. The tourmaline-quartz fracture-fillings and veins can contain anomalous gold values, especially where they cut an earlier gold-bearing quartz vein.

7.7 CURRENT V IEW ON M INERALIZATION C ONTROLS AND I DENTIFICATION OF M INERALIZED M ATERIAL Z ONES

The mineralization of the Magino Mine is associated with varying amounts of alteration to the Webb Lake and Lake Lovell Stocks. This variation is marked by five progressive levels of alteration/deformation described below. In general; alteration levels are marked by increasing amount of foliation, sericite alteration, silicification (veining, flooding, pervasive silicification) and pyrite mineralization. Carbonatization is also apparent, but it is poorly understood if variation from calcite to ankerite is associated with higher gold grades. In areas such as the northeast zone it is also suggested that the focus, or central and most highly altered portion of the ”zone” is associated with dolomite alteration, however this needs more study.

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 41 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario Generally four levels of alteration to the Webb Lake and Lovell Lake Stock granodiorite are recognized, as follows:

• Granodiorite: Relatively unaltered, coarse grained, equigranular quartz – plagioclase – chlorite +/- carbonate with typically more than 10% chlorite, network texture, no planar fabric is observed. • Weakly Altered Granodiorite: Weakly developed planar fabric (foliation) caused by the alignment of sericite/chlorite grains, unit is finer grained than “Network Granodiorite” however relict texture can still be interpreted. Quartz +/- carbonate +/- tourmaline veining varies from 1 to 2%; pyrite mineralization is elevated in places but generally less than 0.5%. • Moderately Altered Granodiorite: Well-developed planar fabric (foliation) caused by alignment of sericite/chlorite grains which make up more than 20% of the rock. This planar sericite/chlorite alignment is referred to as “Sericite Lace”. Dependent on amount of chlorite this rock has a light green to light grey – grey colour. The unit is finer grained than weakly altered granodiorite, with rounded quartz crystals. Quartz +/- carbonate +/- tourmaline veining varies from 2 to 5%; pyrite mineralization is elevated in places but generally 0.5 to 1%. • Strongly Altered Granodiorite: Well-developed planar fabric (foliation) caused by alignment of sericite/chlorite/quartz grains which make up more than 80% of the rock, the remaining constituent being quartz +/- carbonate +/- tourmaline veining. Visible gold is most commonly observed in this alteration, and the presence of visible gold is believed to be dependent on amount of smoky grey quartz veining/flooding (i.e. silica in the system at that locality). Gold bearing grey (altered) quartz veins are typically subparallel to foliation, millimeter-centimeter in scale with some five to ten grey quartz flooded zones. The rock has a green and more often a light tan – pink coloration, remnant intrusive texture is completely destroyed. Remnant quartz phenocrysts are often augen shape and appear isolated in the sericite matrix.

Visible gold is nearly always observed within silica (most typically small veinlets of smoky grey quartz). Gold emplacement within the moderate to strong altered zones is somewhat erratic due to the anastomosing nature of silica (quartz vein/flooding emplacement). As veins are typically less than 5 cm in thickness and pinch and swell in nature or are anastomosing, it is not realistic to model continuity amongst the individual veins. The more broadly altered zones which contain the erratic quartz units are more continuous in nature and can be modelled more readily.

The logging of the current Prodigy drill program is focused on describing foliation, sericite alteration, silica (quartz veining), pyrite mineralization and visible gold mineralization.

It is understood that historic logging and some mapping of the Magino deposit was focused on identifying several ”types” (or compositional phases) of granodiorite. It is

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 42 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario because of this interpretation that Prodigy’s geologists believe the past geological interpretation was forced into a model where the central portion of the stock was considered a more mafic “phase” and then there were ring-shaped outer phases, with a more felsic (and more calcic trondhjemite) phase along the contacts. Prodigy’s interpretation consists of sigmoidal cross-cutting zones which are folded (drag) in places and offset. To some extent, the historic phases were described similarly to the varying amounts of alteration/deformation that are now observed, however the phases were described primarily utilizing compositional differences, ignoring most alteration/deformation variations, and so the historic geologic logging data is not as useful for modelling, beyond the use for general lithology (i.e. granodiorite or metavolcanic).

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 43 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario 8.0 DEPOSIT TYPES

Lode gold deposits (gold from bedrock sources: see Figure 8.1) occur dominantly in terranes with an abundance of volcanic and clastic sedimentary rocks of low to medium metamorphic grade (Poulsen 1996). The Magino Mine is an orogenic gold occurrence related to longitudinal shear zones (greenstone-hosted quartz-carbonate vein deposit). Greenstone-hosted quartz-carbonate vein deposits are a subtype of lode-gold deposits (Poulsen et al. 2000). They correspond to structurally controlled, complex epigenetic deposits hosted in deformed metamorphosed terranes (Dubé and Gosselin 2007).

Figure 8.1 Schematic Diagram Illustrating the Inferred Crustal Levels of Gold Deposition

Source: Dubé et al. 2001; Poulsen et al. 2000

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 44 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario Greenstone-hosted quartz-carbonate vein deposits consist of simple to complex networks of gold-bearing, laminated quartz-carbonate fault-fill veins in moderately to steeply dipping, compressional brittle-ductile shear zones and faults with locally associated shallow-dipping extensional veins and hydrothermal breccias. They are hosted by greenschist to locally amphibolite-facies metamorphic rocks of dominantly mafic composition and formed at intermediate depth in the crust (5 to 10 km). They are distributed along major compressional to transtensional crustal-scale fault zones in deformed greenstone terranes of all ages, but are more abundant and significant, in terms of total gold content, in Archean terranes. Greenstone hosted quartz- carbonate veins are thought to represent a major component of the greenstone deposit clan (Figure 8.1) (Dubé and Gosselin 2007). They can co-exist regionally with iron-formation-hosted vein and disseminated deposits, as well as with turbidite- hosted quartz-carbonate vein deposits (Figure 8.2).

Figure 8.2 Schematic Diagram Illustrating the Setting of Greenstone-Hosted Quartz Carbonate Vein Deposits

Source: Poulsen et al. 2000

The main gangue minerals are quartz and carbonate, with variable amounts of white micas, chlorite, scheelite and tourmaline. The sulphide minerals typically constitute less than 10% of the mineralized material. The main mineralized material minerals are native gold with pyrite, pyrrhotite and chalcopyrite without significant vertical zoning (Dubé and Gosselin 2007).

The Magino gold deposit lies within the Goudreau Lake Deformation Zone, a major contact between Cycle 2 felsic to intermediate pyroclastic metavolcanic rocks to the south and Cycle 3 massive pillowed mafic metavolcanic rocks to the north (Heather and Arias 1992). The Goudreau Lake Deformation Zone appears to be spatially related to a large, regionally mappable intrusive sheet. This rigid meta-intrusive body deformed in a brittle manner relative to the enclosing mafic metavolcanic rocks, thus

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 45 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario acting as a competency contrast and thereby focusing the strain and associated mineralization (Heather and Arias 1992).

In the Magino gold deposit area, the Goudreau Lake Deformation Zone (Figure 8.3) is characterized as a 1- to 2-km wide, 070°-striking zone of subparallel ductile and brittle-ductile high-strain zones (Heather and Arias 1992). Gold mineralization occurs in these high-strain zones.

At the regional scale, there is no readily discernible alteration pattern directly related to gold mineralization. However, rocks within the Goudreau Lake Deformation Zone are slightly more altered relative to the rest of the supracrustal rocks in the Michipicoten Greenstone Belt. This suggests that hydrothermal fluids were preferentially focused into regional deformation zones (Heather and Arias 1992).

Regionally, two types of gold mineralization have been recognized in the Magino gold mine area (Heather and Arias 1992): (1) quartz veins hosted by brittle and brittle-ductile high strain zones; (2) brittle fault-hosted breccia-style mineralization.

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 46 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario Figure 8.3 Location of the Goudreau Lake Deformation Zone

Source: Modified after Heather and Arias 1992

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 47 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario 9.0 EXPLORATION

Prodigy has not conducted surface exploration on the Property, other than drilling, which is described in Section 10.0. Exploration conducted by previous Issuers is discussed in Section 6.0.

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 48 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario 10.0 DRILLING

Prodigy commenced in-fill diamond drilling on the project in January 2011 and has continued to drill into 2012. In September 2011 the current drilling database at the time was provided to Snowden for an updated resource estimate. Full details of the Prodigy drilling prior to September 2011 can be found in the Snowden technical report dated November 2011 (Ross 2011).

Prodigy continued the in-fill drilling program at Magino from September 2011 and continue to drill into 2012. Assays from this 2011/2012 drilling have been included in this mineral resource estimate and includes all holes drilled by Prodigy from September 2011 until June 2012. Assays from drilling after June 2012 have not been included in this updated resource report. Details of pre-Prodigy drilling can be found in Section 6.0 of this report.

10.1.1 TYPE AND EXTENT

From September 2011 until the present time in 2012, Prodigy has continued to drill the infill-drilling program designed in late 2010, and includes the May 2011 expansion holes. The program was carried out by various rigs from two contractors: Northstar Drilling and Cobra Drilling, both of Thunder Bay, Ontario (see Figure 10.1).

Figure 10.1 Diamond Drill Rig

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 49 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario Information used in the resource estimate update includes 67,848 m of drilling from 242 Prodigy holes, including 12 geotechnical holes. Core diameters are NQ or NQ2 for all holes.

The drill rigs are conventional wire-line machines operated by experienced drilling companies. Due to the proximity of underground workings several holes were commenced as HQ diameter and were reduced to NQ diameter on intersecting the workings. Details of the Prodigy drillholes are provided in Table 10.1.

Table 10.1 2011/2012 Prodigy Drilling

Elevation Depth Azimuth Dip Hole ID Easting Northing (m) (m) (°) (°) Target MA11-129 688484.15 5351162.85 393.62 389.00 167.4 -51.4 Webb Lake Stock MA11-130 688433.93 5351158.07 393.69 401.00 162.2 -50.4 Webb Lake Stock MA11-132 688390.13 5351138.95 394.03 356.00 164.8 -50.9 Webb Lake Stock MA11-133 688354.33 5351158.69 393.41 386.00 164.3 -49.7 Webb Lake Stock MA11-134 689297.41 5351576.61 391.98 350.00 161.6 -50.6 Webb Lake Stock MA11-135 688405.63 5351165.05 394.10 374.00 164.8 -49.8 Webb Lake Stock MA11-136 689153.92 5351672.79 407.90 461.00 164.0 -47.9 Webb Lake Stock MA11-137 688452.37 5351180.51 394.49 398.00 167.2 -50.5 Webb Lake Stock MA11-138 689105.44 5351659.14 407.71 455.00 166.4 -52.4 Webb Lake Stock MA11-139 688131.43 5350830.31 392.14 173.00 160.8 -52.3 Webb Lake Stock MA11-140 688099.98 5350924.73 390.84 470.00 162.4 -49.9 Webb Lake Stock MA11-141 689087.48 5351630.97 406.65 453.00 163.8 -50.0 Webb Lake Stock MA11-142 687529.4 5351033.28 396.17 221.00 163.2 -49.1 Webb Lake Stock MA11-143 689055.51 5351650.47 407.8 398.00 165.2 -49.7 Webb Lake Stock MA11-144 687421.27 5351059.18 389.84 188.00 164.5 -53.0 Lovell Lake Stock MA11-145 688692.07 5351240.24 394.27 447.50 167.0 -48.7 Webb Lake Stock MA11-146 687482.6 5351101.99 390.00 179.00 162.4 -49.8 Lovell Lake Stock MA11-147 687579.53 5351125.93 397.74 198.30 163.9 -51.4 Lovell Lake Stock MA11-148 687650.14 5351174.01 397.31 197.00 159.9 -48.5 Lovell Lake Stock MA11-149 688662.06 5351261.57 394.17 485.00 171.4 -50.9 Webb Lake Stock MA11-150 687723.26 5351271.66 394.55 383.00 164.0 -50.6 Lovell Lake Stock MA11-151 688642.8 5351230.59 394.70 476.00 167.7 -50.3 Webb Lake Stock MA11-152 687858.58 5351255.62 393.62 293.00 165.1 -50.6 Lovell Lake Stock MA11-153 687855.05 5351356.64 392.50 335.00 163.5 -48.9 Lovell Lake Stock MA11-154 688517.29 5351225.06 391.72 500.00 164.8 -47.4 Webb Lake Stock MA11-155 687985.67 5351429.95 392.99 311.00 169.7 -49.7 Lovell Lake Stock MA11-156 688467.96 5351213 391.95 530.00 165.3 -50.0 Lovell Lake Stock MA11-157 687575.28 5351247.95 391.27 380.00 172.7 -48.6 Lovell Lake Stock MA11-158 687476.64 5351230.39 392.15 383.00 166.2 -50.5 Lovell Lake Stock MA11-159 687387.32 5351181.86 390.59 347.00 164.0 -49.6 Lovell Lake Stock MA11-160 688176.15 5350849.33 393.56 263.00 161.7 -50.6 Webb Lake Stock MA11-161 688160.94 5350897.16 390.47 260.00 162.1 -50.3 Webb Lake Stock table continues…

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 50 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario Elevation Depth Azimuth Dip Hole ID Easting Northing (m) (m) (°) (°) Target MA11-162 687305.81 5351105.01 389.82 290.00 165.0 -51.6 Lovell Lake Stock MA11-163 688971.98 5351625.08 412.11 308.00 163.6 -49.6 Webb Lake Stock MA11-164 689043.3 5351697.28 405.26 455.00 162.9 -50.5 Webb Lake Stock MA11-165 687313.85 5350980.52 389.78 131.00 168.8 -46.9 Lovell Lake Stock MA11-166 687105.88 5350875.57 390.64 254.00 162.9 -48.5 Lovell Lake Stock MA11-167 689112.41 5351736.91 409.40 527.00 162.9 -49.5 Webb Lake Stock MA11-168 689345.94 5351300.19 396.83 200.00 164.0 -49.2 South Meta Volcanics MA11-169 687065.58 5351021.69 392.88 251.00 169.6 -48.9 Lovell Lake Stock MA11-170 689397.5 5351312.97 396.96 149.00 166.1 -48.9 South Meta Volcanics MA11-171 689450.05 5351303.28 396.20 230.00 164.7 -50.1 South Meta Volcanics MA11-172 688026.84 5351799.97 437.57 284.00 163.3 -50.1 Magino MA11-173 689377.97 5351285.64 398.03 221.00 164.2 -49.6 South Meta Volcanics MA11-174 688035.4 5350884.75 389.98 275.00 165.7 -47.7 Webb Lake Stock MA11-175 688280.42 5351963.54 433.21 479.00 89.4 -50.3 Magino MA11-176 689484.93 5351330.64 395.44 257.00 163.9 -47.4 South Meta Volcanics MA11-177 689189.37 5351735.94 405.82 494.00 166.7 -49.8 Webb Lake Stock MA11-178 688009.68 5350978.27 391.78 401.00 160.0 -45.6 Webb Lake Stock MA11-179 689514.54 5351347.97 394.72 266.00 158.1 -50.4 South Meta Volcanics MA11-180 687736.92 5350627.25 394.69 239.00 164.1 -50.4 Webb Lake Stock MA11-181 688280.78 5351964.91 433.15 437.00 338.7 -50.3 Magino MA11-182 687808.71 5350669.93 394.21 212.00 157.6 -50.2 Webb Lake Stock MA11-183 689112.41 5351736.91 409.40 690.50 166.8 -58.9 Webb Lake Stock MA11-184 687888.86 5350848.28 391.29 356.00 161.3 -49.9 Webb Lake Stock MA11-185 688067.85 5351833.83 437.14 350.00 92.8 -50.2 Magino MA11-186 687781.7 5350766.85 390.77 350.00 162.7 -51.1 Webb Lake Stock MA11-187 687866.22 5351739.78 435.43 425.00 347.9 -49.6 Magino MA11-188 687590.49 5350712.88 392.62 350.00 158.4 -49.4 Webb Lake Stock MA11-189 687830.4 5351675.54 436.51 350.00 95.5 -50.0 Magino MA11-190 687464.24 5350705.97 392.20 449.00 160.9 -51.2 Magino MA11-191 689112.41 5351736.91 409.40 752.00 166.5 -66.4 Webb Lake Stock MA11-192 687738.34 5351612.03 428.57 152.00 92.3 -51.0 Magino MA11-193 687538.84 5351525.88 417.57 305.00 92.7 -50.7 Magino MA11-194 687538.54 5351525.82 417.57 350.00 164.1 -49.8 Magino MA11-195 688202.56 5351219.54 393.07 350.00 345.2 -50.9 Webb Lake Stock MA11-196 687372.09 5351312.54 411.01 350.00 90.7 -50.5 Magino MA11-197 687869.4 5350622.94 395.34 215.00 155.5 -50.3 Webb Lake Stock MA11-198 688143.33 5351148.34 391.35 668.00 161.4 -48.7 Webb Lake Stock MA11-199 688334.01 5351303.83 391.88 350.00 344.7 -48.7 Magino MA11-200 687158.72 5351190.15 406.68 350.00 97.0 -50.0 LovellLakeStock MA11-201 687285.78 5351594.5 410.97 350.00 165.7 -50.5 Magino MA11-202 689112.8 5351735.33 409.51 343.30 346.2 -51.2 Webb Lake Stock table continues…

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 51 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario Elevation Depth Azimuth Dip Hole ID Easting Northing (m) (m) (°) (°) Target MA11-203 688264.22 5351001.75 393.67 347.00 160.3 -49.1 Webb Lake Stock MA11-204 688488 5351320 395.00 350.00 345.3 -50.2 Magino MA11-205 688237.93 5351018.97 393.82 350.00 162.9 -49.4 Webb Lake Stock MA11-206 687377 5351661 415.00 299.00 96.9 -49.6 Magino MA11-207 688214.5 5350988.45 393.00 311.00 161.8 -49.9 Webb Lake Stock MA11-208 688202 5351037 392.00 419.00 164.3 -47.6 Webb Lake Stock MA12-209 688732.82 5351566.72 396.29 350.00 342.6 -49.3 Magino MA12-210 688375.15 5350973.91 390.08 251.00 161.8 -47.5 Webb Lake Stock MA12-211 688920.51 5351637.85 409.05 452.00 343.1 -49.9 Webb Lake Stock MA12-212 688398.3 5350982.64 390.36 272.00 163.2 -49.2 Webb Lake Stock MA12-213 688354.07 5350946.77 390.69 227.00 167.5 -50.2 Webb Lake Stock MA12-214 687375.9 5351018.25 389.82 131.00 158.1 -49.0 Lovell Lake Stock MA12-215 687408.85 5351003.18 389.73 125.00 165.4 -50.9 Lovell Lake Stock MA12-216 687433.49 5351009.88 392.24 122.00 166.0 -49.8 Lovell Lake Stock MA12-217 688359.02 5351027.73 390.07 320.00 167.5 -48.3 Webb Lake Stock MA12-218 688342.04 5350998.31 390.06 281.00 161.8 -48.3 Webb Lake Stock MA12-219 687456.1 5351017.4 393.28 125.00 166.0 -50.6 Lovell Lake Stock MA12-220 687448.94 5351039.02 391.69 137.00 163.9 -51.7 Lovell Lake Stock MA12-221 688639.33 5351924.47 408.35 359.00 167.7 -49.9 Magino MA12-222 687400.33 5351027.21 389.80 131.00 165.0 -50.9 Lovell Lake Stock MA12-223 687372.41 5351043.86 389.86 161.00 161.8 -48.3 Lovell Lake Stock MA12-224 688329.34 5351040.45 390.13 308.00 166.8 -49.4 Webb Lake Stock MA12-225 687392.44 5351050.42 389.94 161.00 163.3 -50.1 Lovell Lake Stock MA12-226 688526.17 5351767.32 398.58 347.00 164.0 -48.8 Magino MA12-227 687413.23 5351083.41 389.86 191.00 163.1 -47.8 Lovell Lake Stock MA12-228 688378.44 5351055.56 390.11 329.00 162.1 -50.2 Webb Lake Stock MA12-229 687384.52 5351073.83 389.84 221.00 162.1 -46.8 Lovell Lake Stock MA12-230 688312.75 5351013.94 390.11 299.00 163.8 -47.2 Webb Lake Stock MA12-231 688475.17 5351753.53 397.77 350.00 339.9 -49.0 Magino MA12-232 687443.03 5351065.08 389.87 161.00 166.7 -49.5 Lovell Lake Stock MA12-233 688243.3 5351740.33 414.08 254.00 166.9 -50.8 Magino MA12-234 687406.1 5351105.37 390.36 224.00 164.4 -49.3 Lovell Lake Stock MA12-235 688281.19 5351029.82 390.22 383.00 171.4 -48.0 Webb Lake Stock MA12-236 689183.97 5351684.31 407.55 329.00 155.0 -44.9 Webb Lake Stock MA12-237 688346.31 5351074.92 390.20 332.00 158.5 -50.7 Webb Lake Stock MA12-238 687467.73 5351069.17 391.00 161.00 161.7 -50.1 Lovell Lake Stock MA12-239 687430.15 5351113.12 390.10 230.00 165.1 -48.2 Lovell Lake Stock MA12-240 689191.53 5351722.42 406.76 284.00 159.1 -45.2 Webb Lake Stock MA12-241 687376.08 5351097.33 389.91 230.00 165.3 -51.1 Lovell Lake Stock MA12-242 688298.51 5351061.82 390.08 380.00 171.6 -47.6 Webb Lake Stock MA12-243 688963.79 5351598.19 411.05 350.00 173.6 -45.2 Webb Lake Stock table continues…

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 52 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario Elevation Depth Azimuth Dip Hole ID Easting Northing (m) (m) (°) (°) Target MA12-244 689247.19 5351309.84 396.90 101.00 162.8 -48.4 South Meta Volcanics MA12-245 689243.17 5351348.4 396.64 140.00 167.3 -49.5 South Meta Volcanics MA12-246 689074.66 5351529.86 390.97 350.00 162.1 -44.7 Webb Lake Stock MA12-247 689210.09 5351281.79 398.31 101.00 161.7 -52 South Meta Volcanics MA12-248 689146.62 5351280.21 395.75 200.00 168.8 -52.8 South Meta Volcanics MA12-249 688251.51 5351047.07 390.01 422.00 166.1 -46.3 Webb Lake Stock MA12-250 689066.1 5351520.32 390.89 500.00 177.1 -43.6 Webb Lake Stock MA12-251 689179.27 5351241.56 398.12 110.00 165.8 -49.7 South Meta Volcanics MA12-252 689085.86 5351196.77 403.82 132.00 139.5 -57.7 South Meta Volcanics MA12-253 689070.61 5351184.03 402.02 92.00 175.4 -55.9 South Meta Volcanics MA12-254 688708.85 5351073.4 397.74 110.00 209.2 -61.2 Webb Lake Stock MA12-255 689315.11 5351385.88 394.93 221.00 206.3 -49.4 Webb Lake Stock MA12-256 689103.55 5351548.93 392.50 450.00 180.7 -46.2 Webb Lake Stock MA12-257 688689.98 5351030.6 396.98 182.00 181.2 -55.6 Webb Lake Stock MA12-258 688267.85 5351080.64 390.12 461.00 165.1 -49.1 Webb Lake Stock MA12-259 688728.19 5351031.9 396.23 152.00 171.4 -49.8 Webb Lake Stock MA12-260 689292.55 5351393.99 394.31 122.00 140.0 -55.8 Webb Lake Stock MA12-261 689301.94 5351454.76 396.18 212.00 172.5 -53 Webb Lake Stock MA12-262 688732.73 5351033.35 395.98 71.00 166.0 -49.9 Webb Lake Stock MA12-263 688728.42 5351052.98 395.72 182.00 180.3 -55.1 Webb Lake Stock MA12-264 689072.75 5351530.19 390.96 380.00 166.0 -46.0 Webb Lake Stock MA12-265 689315.77 5351462.71 396.21 251.00 188.1 -45.4 Webb Lake Stock MA12-266 688693.28 5351076.1 398.37 230.00 159.7 -60.6 Webb Lake Stock MA12-267 688334.89 5351022.83 390.14 290.00 164.7 -50.0 Webb Lake Stock MA12-268 689093.68 5351501.34 390.99 401.00 168.9 -44.8 Webb Lake Stock MA12-269 688722.01 5351086.33 397.17 230.00 204.3 -52.3 Webb Lake Stock MA12-270 689321.92 5351479.46 395.76 170.00 163.3 -49.6 Webb Lake Stock MA12-271 689302 5351495.92 394.33 260.00 184.8 -47.4 Webb Lake Stock MA12-272 688333.87 5351124.97 390.05 410.00 166.3 -50.9 Webb Lake Stock MA12-273 688760.91 5351120.38 395.23 260.00 109.0 -49.2 Webb Lake Stock MA12-274 688958.91 5351576.3 408.45 452.00 176.7 -45.1 Webb Lake Stock MA12-275 688801.6 5351164.67 393.91 230.00 170.2 -48.2 Webb Lake Stock MA12-276 689386.62 5351463.75 394.97 80.00 166.6 -49.6 Webb Lake Stock MA12-277 689368.01 5351501.55 395.02 140.00 166.0 -51.9 Webb Lake Stock MA12-278 689297.23 5350692.81 384.45 290.00 149.3 -49.5 Magino MA12-279 689217.06 5351455.47 394.75 350.00 187.7 -50.2 Webb Lake Stock MA12-280 689046 5351437.37 391.82 449.00 180.8 -42.7 Webb Lake Stock MA12-281 689193.18 5351351.32 396.88 281.00 163.5 -48.2 Webb Lake Stock MA12-282 688365.36 5351105.24 390.32 350.00 166.4 -51.6 Webb Lake Stock MA12-283 689334.56 5350541.83 385.81 257.00 95.7 -50.4 Magino MA12-284 689148.12 5351324.71 397.88 221.00 167.1 -51.6 Webb Lake Stock table continues…

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 53 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario Elevation Depth Azimuth Dip Hole ID Easting Northing (m) (m) (°) (°) Target MA12-285 688288.84 5351138.86 390.20 380.00 164.5 -48.2 Webb Lake Stock MA12-286 688856.47 5351252.2 396.91 350.00 137.5 -49.2 Webb Lake Stock MA12-287 689599.15 5350736.5 385.76 350.00 154.8 -47.6 Magino MA12-288 689141.6 5351369.54 397.07 356.00 167.4 -50.0 Webb Lake Stock MA12-289 688250.58 5351117.8 390.19 521.00 163.3 -48.9 Webb Lake Stock MA12-290 689008.76 5351431.36 395.26 509.00 169.1 -43.1 Webb Lake Stock MA12-291 688205.81 5351101.5 390.23 407.00 168.6 -47.3 Webb Lake Stock MA12-292 688852.77 5351250.05 396.92 206.00 140.6 -56.0 Webb Lake Stock MA12-293 689178.52 5351406.08 397.61 512.00 135.2 -53.9 Webb Lake Stock MA12-294 688817.64 5351236.54 396.21 320.00 104.0 -49.6 Webb Lake Stock MA12-295 689010.36 5351391.36 394.99 449.00 172.2 -42.7 Webb Lake Stock MA12-296 688654.74 5350997.61 397.03 77.00 175.0 -55.0 Webb Lake Stock MA12-297 689188.64 5351315.68 396.80 350.00 152.6 -55.0 Webb Lake Stock MA12-298 688794.75 5351115.85 394.86 269.00 153.1 -59.5 Webb Lake Stock MA12-299 689012.19 5351180.68 403.48 200.00 157.6 -65.1 Webb Lake Stock MA12-300 689184.04 5351295.76 397.44 242.00 163.0 -47.9 Webb Lake Stock MA12-301 688873.76 5351183.8 398.23 251.00 155.9 -49.8 Webb Lake Stock MA12-302 688792.77 5351102.77 394.98 290.00 186.2 -54.6 Webb Lake Stock MA12-303 688596.4 5350891.43 391.76 110.00 166.3 -57.4 Webb Lake Stock MA12-304 689020.99 5351193.56 403.80 83.00 197.0 -50.0 Webb Lake Stock MA12-305 689125.45 5351237.66 397.86 251.00 204.3 -46.7 Webb Lake Stock MA12-306 688657.41 5350922.25 393.54 50.00 168.9 -47.3 Webb Lake Stock MA12-307 688952.36 5351127.34 401.04 131.00 150.0 -65.0 Webb Lake Stock MA12-308 689010.96 5351173.71 403.55 161.00 174.2 -49.6 Webb Lake Stock MA12-309 688767.34 5351091.11 394.69 69.50 157.2 -55.8 Webb Lake Stock MA12-310 688723.57 5350962.23 394.6 110.00 123.1 -46.9 Webb Lake Stock MA12-311 688872.64 5351177.63 398.38 251.00 180.8 -49.8 Webb Lake Stock MA12-312 689185.19 5351221.09 398.21 152.00 219.2 -59.4 Webb Lake Stock MA12-313 688811.17 5351117.07 395.45 221.00 153.6 -48.2 Webb Lake Stock MA12-314 688727.25 5350982.6 395.77 74.00 160.0 -50.0 Webb Lake Stock MA12-315 689011.66 5351279.55 399.78 272.00 136.7 -44.4 Webb Lake Stock MA12-316 689027.98 5351134.29 399.31 36.50 170.0 -50.0 Webb Lake Stock MA12-317 689092.99 5351213.43 402.18 35.00 178.3 -68.6 Webb Lake Stock MA12-318 688661.15 5350956.48 395.39 110.00 161.6 -49.7 Webb Lake Stock MA12-319 688929.48 5351116.86 396.36 149.00 160.0 -53.0 Webb Lake Stock MA12-320 688828.71 5351097.58 394.60 221.00 163.0 -56.4 Webb Lake Stock MA12-321 689065.64 5351374.33 394.54 131.00 150.8 -53.2 Webb Lake Stock MA12-322 688885.11 5351182.6 399.13 230.00 142.0 -55.8 Webb Lake Stock MA12-323 688619.35 5350940.59 393.10 140.00 163.7 -61.5 Webb Lake Stock MA12-324 688920.17 5351134.94 396.60 173.00 180.8 -54.5 Webb Lake Stock MA12-325 688734.36 5351049.97 395.97 230.00 157.1 -58.5 Webb Lake Stock table continues…

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 54 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario Elevation Depth Azimuth Dip Hole ID Easting Northing (m) (m) (°) (°) Target MA12-326 689088.28 5351352.41 394.14 380.00 173.4 -50.3 Webb Lake Stock MA12-327 688948.73 5351192.46 404.21 260.00 116.6 -48.2 Webb Lake Stock MA12-328 688421.92 5350870.52 392.65 80.00 155.1 -43.1 Webb Lake Stock MA12-329 688894.49 5351108.89 396.58 155.00 181.1 -53.0 Webb Lake Stock MA12-330 688720.93 5351086.75 397.18 341.00 170.2 -61.6 Webb Lake Stock MA12-331 688483.74 5350889.66 399.27 131.00 159.3 -47.2 Webb Lake Stock MA12-332 688820.22 5351052.39 393.73 200.00 157.1 -61.1 Webb Lake Stock MA12-333 689021.57 5351296.4 398.51 251.00 192.4 -64.9 Webb Lake Stock MA12-334 688876.42 5351158.84 399.46 37.00 179.6 -45.1 Webb Lake Stock MA12-335 688457.57 5350872.35 398.32 101.00 161.2 -39.6 Webb Lake Stock MA12-336 688688.55 5350996.12 395.38 120.50 162.0 -50.8 Webb Lake Stock MA12-337 688876.43 5351158.88 399.49 290.00 106.4 -56.2 Webb Lake Stock MA12-338 688608.93 5351059.31 398.46 260.00 182.6 -49.5 Webb Lake Stock MA12-339 688472.05 5350971.68 392.32 242.00 169.6 -50.0 Webb Lake Stock MA12-340 689007.51 5351315.81 396.23 410.00 149.8 -54.5 Webb Lake Stock MA12-341 688687.72 5350988.75 395.37 131.00 139.7 -45.8 Webb Lake Stock MA12-342 688861 5351225.11 396.31 329.00 149.3 -49.3 Webb Lake Stock MA12-343 688606.27 5351053.38 398.13 299.00 197.1 -47.0 Webb Lake Stock MA12-344 688502.3 5350988.7 394.85 230.00 163.1 -54.0 Webb Lake Stock MA12-345 688593.59 5351022.17 397.84 110.00 105.7 -51.8 Webb Lake Stock MA12-346 689105.37 5351330.87 394.43 251.00 153.4 -50.8 Webb Lake Stock MA12-347 688637.03 5351108.59 396.09 431.00 114.9 -47.5 Webb Lake Stock MA12-348 688956.43 5351297.69 396.68 88.40 160.4 -45.3 Webb Lake Stock MA12-349 688449.42 5351013.97 399.33 260.00 158.2 -50.4 Webb Lake Stock MA12-350 688988.19 5351367.55 394.53 392.00 149.4 -39.6 Webb Lake Stock MA12-351 688585.23 5351013.76 398.63 233.00 148.4 -54.5 Webb Lake Stock MA12-352 688880.2 5351335.96 391.78 446.00 114.9 -47.5 Webb Lake Stock MA12-353 689085.74 5351425.93 391.7 620.00 172.6 -56.7 Webb Lake Stock MA12-354 688540.43 5351013.11 397.00 209.00 157.9 -52.5 Webb Lake Stock MA12-355 688427.77 5351057.08 393.22 350.00 168.9 -49.5 Webb Lake Stock MA12-356 688629.81 5351095.22 397.12 103.00 184.0 -56.6 Webb Lake Stock MA12-358 688924.43 5351458.85 392.48 752.00 178.6 -47.9 Webb Lake Stock MA12-360 688590.54 5351130.49 393.95 135.50 159.1 -45.5 Webb Lake Stock MA12-366 688781.73 5351147.18 393.62 329.00 145.8 -63.0 Webb Lake Stock GT-11-01 688284.83 5350780.4 389.30 161.00 4.9 -65.6 Magino Geotech GT-11-02 688562.81 5351223.65 395.07 251.00 87.7 -60.3 Magino Geotech GT-11-03 688858.36 5351508.8 395.12 290.00 198.0 -70.2 Magino Geotech GT-11-04 689286.08 5351661.03 403.51 227.00 159.2 -64.5 Magino Geotech GT-11-09 688410.52 5350840.29 389.87 194.80 148.2 -67.5 Magino Geotech GT-12-05 689376.8 5351277.82 398.03 317.00 278.8 -69.3 Magino Geotech GT-12-06 689378.68 5351277.63 397.94 50.00 97.6 -60.2 Magino Geotech table continues…

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 55 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario Elevation Depth Azimuth Dip Hole ID Easting Northing (m) (m) (°) (°) Target GT-12-07 689270.12 5350948.27 394.13 326.00 299.1 -63.3 Magino Geotech GT-12-08 689271.68 5350946.99 394.07 47.00 121.5 -64.1 Magino Geotech GT-12-10 689082.75 5350970.85 386.55 302.00 173.0 -74.3 Magino Geotech GT-12-11 688707.74 5350910.41 389.13 251.00 43.2 -69.9 Magino Geotech GT-12-12 688806.37 5350888.8 386.60 50.00 139.0 -57.3 Magino Geotech

10.1.2 DRILL COLLARS

The procedures used by Prodigy for surveying drill collars have been consistent throughout all of their campaigns. Drillholes are located and set-up so that, as much as possible, the drillholes are perpendicular to the strike and dip of the mineralized zones at Magino. Drillhole collar locations are surveyed to 1 cm accuracy using digital global positioning system (DGPS) instruments.

The azimuths are usually set out using a compass and flagging tape/pickets for the rig to line up with as foresights and back-sights. The dip is then set by the driller using a clinometer, and all this is usually confirmed by the geologist or field staff onsite at the time to ensure quality control is maintained.

All collars are then picked up by again using a DGPS means to 1 cm accuracy.

10.1.3 DOWN-HOLE SURVEYS

Down-hole surveys were collected for all holes at approximately 3 m intervals using a reflex multi-shot down-hole surveying tool.

10.1.4 GEOLOGICAL LOGGING

Drill core at Magino is boxed, covered, and sealed at the drill rig and moved to the Prodigy logging and sample preparation facilities by Prodigy personnel. Then all cores were logged by qualified Prodigy geologists familiar with the Project.

Logging was conducted on tough-book lap top computers utilizing digital logging software.

The drill logs recorded major lithological units, alteration, oxidation, some minor structure, mineralisation, veining, textures and minor lithological units as well and the sample intervals.

Drill core at Magino is boxed, covered, and sealed at the drill rig and moved to the Prodigy logging and sample preparation facilities by Prodigy personnel (Figure 10.2 to Figure 10.5)

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 56 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario Figure 10.2 Core Logging Facility

Figure 10.3 Core Cutting Facility

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 57 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario Figure 10.4 Specific Gravity Station

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 58 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario Figure 10.5 Core Storage Facility

10.1.5 DRILLHOLE CASING

All collar casings are left in the ground with a plug in each stating hole name, coordinates and orientation, there is often a wooden stake with the above information next each collar point too, for ease of identification at a later time. Collars are also plugged to prevent local fauna from becoming trapped in them (Figure 10.6)

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 59 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario Figure 10.6 Drill Collar Cap

10.1.6 2011/12 DIAMOND DRILLING RESULTS

Drilling continued to establish continuity between past mineralised intercepts on the mineralisation trends. Table 10.2 provides a summary of mineralization intercepts from Prodigy’s drilling program for holes drilled between September 2011 and April 2012 inclusively. The results are composited where the minimum down-hole gram- meterage was greater than 9 g/m. All sample lengths are quoted as down-the-hole lengths.

Table 10.2 2011/2012 Drilling Significant Intercepts

From To Length Au Hole ID (m) (m) (m) (g/t) Lode MA11-129 115.0 121.0 6.0 1.58 11 MA11-129 359.0 365.0 6.0 4.63 22 MA11-130 226.0 227.0 1.0 13.15 11 MA11-130 259.0 263.0 4.0 4.60 12 MA11-130 353.0 355.0 2.0 10.61 12 MA11-132 198.0 199.0 1.0 15.55 11 MA11-132 326.5 328.0 1.5 8.64 3 MA11-134 187.0 207.0 20.0 1.01 16 table continues…

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 60 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario From To Length Au Hole ID (m) (m) (m) (g/t) Lode MA11-134 284.0 288.0 4.0 2.39 17 MA11-134 336.0 340.0 4.0 4.70 17 MA11-134 343.0 348.0 5.0 4.75 17 MA11-135 298.0 304.0 6.0 10.65 12 MA11-135 323.0 324.0 1.0 29.80 12 MA11-136 218.0 255.0 37.0 2.10 16 MA11-136 267.0 276.0 9.0 1.68 16 MA11-136 281.0 296.0 15.0 0.93 16 MA11-136 336.0 340.0 4.0 4.74 16 MA11-137 356.0 357.0 1.0 12.15 12 MA11-138 268.0 298.0 30.0 1.38 16 MA11-138 323.0 342.0 19.0 1.08 16 MA11-138 401.0 405.0 4.0 2.38 17 MA11-141 225.0 231.0 6.0 2.28 16 MA11-141 243.0 251.0 8.0 2.72 16 MA11-141 255.0 265.0 10.0 1.98 16 MA11-141 273.0 278.0 5.0 1.95 16 MA11-143 306.0 312.0 6.0 3.96 16 MA11-145 173.0 175.0 2.0 12.49 11 MA11-149 281.0 282.0 1.0 13.10 12 MA11-149 297.0 316.0 19.0 3.38 12 MA11-149 337.0 338.0 1.0 11.75 12 MA11-151 340.0 341.0 1.0 84.20 12 MA11-154 170.0 173.0 3.0 3.74 13 MA11-154 408.0 409.0 1.0 11.10 12 MA11-154 431.0 434.0 3.0 3.39 12 MA11-154 447.0 451.0 4.0 4.14 12 MA11-156 174.0 175.0 1.0 17.55 11 MA11-156 310.0 311.0 1.0 10.60 12 MA11-160 79.0 81.0 2.0 9.78 12 MA11-160 123.0 125.0 2.0 7.93 22 MA11-160 153.0 155.0 2.0 8.46 22 MA11-160 166.5 170.0 3.5 5.56 22 MA11-161 118.0 121.0 3.0 8.35 12 MA11-161 222.0 223.0 1.0 30.60 12 MA11-162 180.0 184.5 4.5 5.37 19 MA11-164 339.0 363.0 24.0 1.98 16 MA11-164 368.0 374.0 6.0 2.28 16 MA11-164 377.0 389.0 12.0 2.59 16 MA11-167 312.0 348.0 36.0 1.86 16 MA11-167 470.0 472.0 2.0 19.49 17 table continues…

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 61 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario From To Length Au Hole ID (m) (m) (m) (g/t) Lode MA11-168 84.0 96.0 12.0 1.94 28 MA11-168 146.0 167.0 21.0 1.70 29 MA11-173 136.0 139.0 3.0 10.87 30 MA11-173 142.0 147.0 5.0 2.75 30 MA11-177 228.0 230.0 2.0 16.32 16 MA11-177 259.0 275.0 16.0 1.56 16 MA11-177 290.0 293.0 3.0 3.85 16 MA11-177 298.5 342.0 43.5 3.68 16 MA11-177 401.0 423.0 22.0 1.12 16 MA11-177 453.0 460.0 7.0 1.80 17 MA11-178 256.0 260.0 4.0 2.78 12 MA11-178 393.0 399.0 6.0 1.87 - MA11-179 11.4 20.0 8.6 2.08 26 MA11-183 362.0 386.0 24.0 1.67 16 MA11-183 431.0 452.0 21.0 1.60 16 MA11-183 483.3 486.0 2.7.0 5.37 16 MA11-188 212.0 214.0 2.0 20.88 - MA11-191 429.0 438.0 9.0 1.42 16 MA11-191 459.0 465.0 6.0 3.80 16 MA11-191 671.0 672.0 1.0 21.40 17 MA11-198 350.0 371.0 21.0 1.69 12 MA11-203 69.0 70.0 1.0 17.40 11 MA11-203 185.0 187.0 2.0 5.23 12 MA11-203 255.0 256.0 1.0 17.15 12 MA11-205 83.0 94.0 11.0 9.45 32 MA11-205 102.0 103.0 1.0 10.30 32 MA11-205 274.0 276.0 2.0 4.80 12 MA11-205 336.6 343.0 6.4 3.14 22 MA11-207 72.0 73.0 1.0 14.75 11 MA11-207 264.0 268.0 4.0 4.06 12 MA12-210 47.0 50.0 3.0 11.48 11 MA12-212 73.0 74.0 1.0 12.15 11 MA12-212 157.0 160.0 3.0 6.50 12 MA12-212 165.0 166.0 1.0 13.90 12 MA12-212 218.0 221.0 3.0 3.98 22 MA12-213 160.0 162.0 2.0 8.23 12 MA12-213 183.0 184.0 1.0 10.50 22 MA12-218 228.0 229.0 1.0 14.90 12 MA12-218 252.0 257.0 5.0 14.18 22 MA12-224 218.0 219.0 1.0 15.50 12 MA12-225 45.0 56.0 11.0 1.95 19 table continues…

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 62 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario From To Length Au Hole ID (m) (m) (m) (g/t) Lode MA12-225 150.0 154.0 4.0 4.73 21 MA12-228 115.0 118.0 3.0 6.40 11 MA12-228 190.0 192.0 2.0 5.68 12 MA12-229 67.0 75.0 8.0 1.26 19 MA12-230 215.0 217.0 2.0 10.25 12 MA12-234 114.0 124.0 10.0 1.20 19 MA12-235 332.0 335.0 3.0 6.48 22 MA12-236 240.0 247.5 7.5 10.45 16 MA12-236 252.0 254.0 2.0 9.92 16 MA12-236 270.0 273.0 3.0 5.06 16 MA12-237 258.0 266.0 8.0 1.64 12 MA12-239 96.0 102.0 6.0 1.99 19 MA12-240 231.0 237.0 6.0 2.44 16 MA12-240 246.0 251.0 5.0 10.48 16 MA12-240 264.5 275.0 10.5 4.47 16 MA12-243 234.0 235.0 1.0 15.10 34 MA12-243 311.0 314.0 3.0 5.96 14 MA12-245 27.0 28.0 1.0 78.90 17 MA12-245 75.0 76.0 1.0 26.90 17 MA12-245 123.0 124.0 1.0 21.40 27 MA12-246 100.0 109.0 9.0 3.28 16 MA12-246 142.0 157.0 15.0 4.25 16 MA12-246 202.0 206.0 4.0 12.25 16 MA12-247 40.0 45.0 5.0 3.14 15 MA12-248 85.0 90.0 5.0 2.18 15 MA12-248 107.0 119.0 12.0 2.35 15 MA12-249 105.0 108.0 3.0 3.30 32 MA12-249 285.0 287.0 2.0 6.19 12 MA12-249 360.4 363.0 2.6 5.93 22 MA12-250 109.0 133.0 24.0 1.11 16 MA12-250 136.0 144.0 8.0 1.95 16 MA12-250 161.0 166.0 5.0 2.23 16 MA12-250 380.0 382.0 2.0 13.26 11 MA12-250 467.0 477.0 10.0 1.98 11 MA12-251 58.0 63.0 5.0 3.05 28 MA12-252 19.0 30.0 11.0 6.11 11 MA12-252 44.0 45.0 1.0 14.40 11 MA12-254 99.0 106.0 7.0 8.19 12 MA12-256 108.0 133.0 25.0 1.66 16 MA12-256 161.0 184.0 23.0 2.38 16 MA12-256 352.0 356.0 4.0 3.02 15 table continues…

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 63 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario From To Length Au Hole ID (m) (m) (m) (g/t) Lode MA12-257 26.0 37.0 11.0 17.01 12 MA12-257 47.0 55.0 8.0 1.86 12 MA12-257 67.0 74.0 7.0 1.59 12 MA12-257 109.0 110.0 1.0 11.60 24 MA12-258 321.0 327.0 6.0 2.00 12 MA12-258 350.0 351.0 1.0 18.40 22 MA12-259 13.0 18.0 5.0 2.71 12 MA12-261 167.0 172.0 5.0 4.00 17 MA12-263 30.0 40.0 10.0 1.12 12 MA12-263 68.0 71.4 3.4 6.00 12 MA12-264 104.0 113.0 9.0 2.18 16 MA12-264 120.0 180.0 60.0 2.23 16 MA12-264 342.0 343.0 1.0 17.80 15 MA12-264 350.0 361.0 11.0 1.66 15 MA12-265 49.0 56.0 7.0 2.20 16 MA12-265 152.0 160.0 8.0 3.57 17 MA12-266 79.0 88.0 9.0 1.33 12 MA12-267 214.0 222.0 8.0 1.80 12 MA12-268 93.9 114.0 20.1 1.56 16 MA12-269 32.0 41.0 9.0 1.83 11 MA12-269 91.0 99.0 8.0 1.84 12 MA12-269 123.0 132.0 9.0 1.21 12 MA12-269 170.0 176.0 6.0 2.33 12 MA12-270 27.0 28.0 1.0 13.60 16 MA12-270 61.0 62.0 1.0 19.20 16 MA12-271 175.0 176.0 1.0 132.00 17 MA12-272 307.0 310.0 3.0 3.60 12 MA12-272 350.0 351.0 1.0 34.20 22 MA12-273 22.0 28.0 6.0 3.65 11 MA12-273 138.0 139.0 1.0 17.50 12 MA12-275 129.0 135.0 6.0 2.56 12 MA12-277 103.0 104.0 1.0 14.50 16 MA12-279 80.0 81.0 1.0 18.90 16 MA12-279 176.0 177.0 1.0 19.00 17 MA12-279 220.0 227.0 7.0 1.67 15 MA12-280 109.0 117.0 8.0 6.44 14 MA12-281 126.0 129.0 3.0 16.76 15 MA12-281 217.0 221.0 4.0 11.72 28 MA12-284 55.0 57.0 2.0 7.93 15 MA12-284 162.0 164.0 2.0 16.24 3 MA12-285 312.0 317.0 5.0 2.93 12 table continues…

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 64 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario From To Length Au Hole ID (m) (m) (m) (g/t) Lode MA12-286 17.0 29.0 12.0 1.49 13 MA12-288 129.0 132.0 3.0 4.23 15 MA12-290 237.0 238.0 1.0 32.40 11 MA12-290 250.0 255.0 5.0 4.63 11 MA12-290 292.0 336.0 44.0 2.23 11 MA12-290 343.0 351.0 8.0 1.80 11 MA12-290 414.0 417.0 3.0 16.21 12 MA12-290 442.0 446.0 4.0 9.62 12 MA12-292 120.0 129.0 9.0 4.97 11 MA12-292 182.0 200.0 18.0 3.54 11 MA12-293 71.0 72.0 1.0 29.90 17 MA12-293 105.0 108.0 3.0 3.73 17 MA12-293 147.0 150.0 3.0 3.39 17 MA12-293 374.0 377.0 3.0 5.87 28 MA12-294 88.0 94.0 6.0 4.13 13 MA12-294 163.0 172.0 9.0 6.25 11 MA12-294 303.0 306.0 3.0 5.05 11 MA12-295 251.0 261.0 10.0 4.24 11 MA12-297 202.0 204.0 2.0 14.06 28 MA12-298 95.0 96.0 1.0 14.90 12 MA12-298 102.0 104.0 2.0 5.17 12 MA12-298 221.0 229.0 8.0 1.79 24 MA12-299 98.0 106.0 8.0 31.00 12 MA12-301 95.0 96.0 1.0 22.5 12 MA12-302 179.0 183.0 4.0 5.65 24 MA12-305 54.0 57.0 3.0 4.53 11 MA12-305 62.0 69.0 7.0 3.34 11 MA12-308 27.0 29.0 2.0 15.83 11 MA12-308 50.0 53.0 3.0 3.42 12 MA12-311 26.0 31.0 5.0 4.16 11 MA12-311 61.0 66.0 5.0 2.45 11 MA12-312 42.0 53.8 11.8 4.42 - MA12-313 2.0 3.0 1.0 39.90 11 MA12-313 83.0 86.0 3.0 4.47 12 MA12-315 174.0 175.0 1.0 15.50 11 MA12-317 25.0 35.0 10.0 3.38 11 MA12-320 47.0 54.0 7.0 2.08 12 MA12-322 126.0 127.0 1.0 33.40 12 MA12-323 10.0 21.0 11.0 1.54 12 MA12-323 24.0 34.0 10.0 1.31 12 MA12-324 48.0 56.0 8.0 3.16 12 table continues…

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 65 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario From To Length Au Hole ID (m) (m) (m) (g/t) Lode MA12-325 27.0 33.0 6.0 4.38 12 MA12-326 205.0 210.0 5.0 15.00 11 MA12-326 216.0 224.0 8.0 2.68 11 MA12-327 75.0 79.0 4.0 3.73 11 MA12-327 95.0 101.0 6.0 2.52 11 MA12-327 142.0 143.0 1.0 74.50 12 MA12-330 85.0 87.0 2.0 5.59 12 MA12-330 180.0 182.6 2.6 6.21 - MA12-330 202.0 204.0 2.0 9.05 - MA12-332 13.0 14.0 1.0 21.00 12 MA12-332 29.0 38.0 9.0 1.64 12 MA12-333 154.0 168.0 14.0 3.49 11 MA12-334 15.0 32.0 17.0 2.81 11 MA12-335 66.0 67.0 1.0 28.10 22 MA12-336 62.0 63.0 1.0 46.20 12 MA12-337 75.0 77.0 2.0 12.70 11 MA12-338 128.0 149.0 21.0 3.01 12 MA12-339 60.0 61.0 1.0 20.80 12 MA12-339 99.0 127.0 28.0 1.23 12 MA12-340 87.0 89.0 2.0 6.79 13 MA12-340 180.0 209.0 29.0 6.05 11 MA12-340 259.0 260.0 1.0 39.60 11 MA12-341 24.0 26.0 2.0 5.98 12 MA12-343 184.0 202.0 18.0 2.07 12 MA12-343 254.0 255.0 1.0 28.10 22 MA12-344 10.0 21.0 11.0 5.06 11 MA12-347 171.0 175.0 4.0 6.11 12 MA12-347 267.0 269.0 2.0 11.93 - MA12-347 422.0 425.0 3.0 5.49 25 MA12-349 91.0 94.0 3.0 4.37 11 MA12-350 61.0 65.0 4.0 4.70 13 MA12-351 65.0 66.0 1.0 19.00 12 MA12-351 73.0 74.0 1.0 21.20 12 MA12-352 41.0 51.0 10.0 2.23 14 MA12-352 173.0 194.0 21.0 1.47 13 MA12-352 242.0 251.0 9.0 1.94 11 MA12-352 296.0 300.0 4.0 3.78 11 MA12-352 426.0 430.0 4.0 21.86 11 MA12-353 440.0 441.0 1.0 33.80 12 MA12-353 461.0 462.0 1.0 80.80 12 MA12-355 195.0 213.0 18.0 1.81 12 table continues…

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 66 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario From To Length Au Hole ID (m) (m) (m) (g/t) Lode MA12-358 354.0 363.0 9.0 3.05 11 MA12-358 537.0 539.0 2.0 12.35 12 MA12-358 556.0 562.0 6.0 1.87 12 MA12-360 98.0 102.0 4.0 3.98 11 MA12-366 125.0 129.1 4.1 4.33 12 GT-11-01 57.0 60.0 3.0 3.82 23 GT-11-09 87.0 88.0 1.0 13.05 22 GT-11-09 163.0 164.0 1.0 10.55 22 GT-12-05 151.0 152.0 1.0 30.90 26

10.1.7 CORE RECOVERY

Tetra Tech believes that there are no recovery factors that would materially affect the sampling. The rock mass is quite typically tight and recovery information indicates better than 98% core recovery in the granodiorite stocks. Core recoveries only seem to be affected when old underground workings are encountered.

10.1.8 SAMPLING METHOD

The following is a description of the sampling method’s employed by Prodigy in 2011/2012:

• Core that was to be sampled was first logged by the geologist, and a cut line is drawn on the core, perpendicular to the dominant structural fabric. • The core was cut into halves by a Prodigy employee, using a table-fed circular diamond saw; one-half of the core sent for analysis and the remaining half was labeled and retained in core boxes for future reference. Core cutting was supervised by the geologist logging core who ensured that a sequence of blanks, duplicates and standards was followed. • Sampling occurred at 1 m intervals, or less to account for lithological contacts. • Zones of low core recovery were noted, but rare due to the competency of the rock mass • The half core selected for analysis was always taken from one side; without regard for the presence of visible gold, in order to reduce sampling bias. • The sampled half core was placed into clean, new transparent plastic sample bags with one pre-printed sample tag (since laboratories use an internal numbering system). The sample bags were rolled and sealed with staples.

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 67 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario • A metal tag was stapled in the core tray along with the meterage represented by the sample. The sample tag was also printed on the remaining sample card in the booklets, and once all tags have been used the booklets are stored in the core logging facility. • The sealed sample bags were placed in rice sacks in sequence for shipment to the laboratory. A copy of the sample submittal form was returned to the project geologist/project manager after being stamped by the receiving laboratory. Samples were transported by Prodigy personnel or collected by the laboratories directly from the project. If a third party transportation company was used, the number or rice sacks was accounted for and sealed with a numbered sealing tie. The number of bags was controlled by the laboratory to ensure they were not tampered with. • The 2011/2012 drilling programs were conducted under the supervision of Prodigy employees. Employees of Prodigy who undertook the samplings were supervised at all times by company QPs and this is normal industry practice. Mr. Tom Pollock, P.Geo. was the QP for drilling and sampling conducted in this period. • QA/QC is discussed in more detail in Section 11.0.

10.1.9 DRILL PLAN

Figure 10.7 provides the locations of Prodigy drillholes that were drilled between September 2011 and June 2012. It also depicts the major lithologies found at the Property.

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 68 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario Figure 10.7 Plan View of 2011/2012 Drill Collars at the Property

North

Webb Lake Stock Lovell Lake Stock

Meta-Volcanics

Diabase Dyke 500m

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 69 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario 11.0 SAMPLE PREPARATION, ANALYSES, AND SECURITY

11.1 SAMPLE P REPARATION

The sealed sample bags were placed in rice sacks in sequence for shipment to the laboratory. A copy of the sample submittal form was returned to the project geologist/project manager after being stamped by the receiving laboratory. Samples were transported by Prodigy personnel or collected by the laboratories directly from the project. If a third-party transportation company was used, the number or rice sacks was accounted for and sealed with a numbered sealing tie. The number of bags was controlled by the laboratory to ensure they were not tampered with.

11.2 LABORATORY F ACILITIES

11.2.1 ACTIVATION LABORATORIES LTD.

The Activation Laboratories Ltd. (Actlabs) are located in Thunder Bay, Ontario. The following is an extract from the company website (www.actlabs.com):

Actlabs’ Quality System is accredited to international quality standards through the International Organization for Standardization /International Electrotechnical Commission (ISO/IEC) 17025 (ISO/IEC 17025 includes ISO 9001 and ISO 9002 specifications) with CAN-P-1758 (Forensics), CAN-P-1579 (Mineral Analysis) and CAN-P-1585 (Environmental) for specific registered tests by the SCC. The accreditation program includes ongoing audits which verify the QA system and all applicable registered test methods. We are also accredited by the National Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Conference (NELAC) program and Health Canada.

11.2.2 ALS CHEMEX

ALS Chemex is a division of ALS Laboratory Group, itself owned by the publically listed company, Campbell Brothers Limited (in Australia).

ALS Chemex has a sample preparation facility located in, Timmins, Ontario. Prepared samples were shipped from Timmins to the ALS Chemex laboratory in Val D’Or, Québec. ALS Chemex laboratories are registered to ISO 9001:2008 certification, and analytical facilities have received ISO 17025 accreditations for specific laboratory procedures.

ALS Chemex commenced processing of Prodigy’s Magino samples on June 21, 2010.

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 70 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario 11.3 SAMPLE S PLITTING AND R EDUCTION

11.3.1 ACTIVATION LABORATORIES

Upon arrival at Actlabs in Thunder Bay, Ontario, rock samples are entered into the Laboratory Information Management System (LIMS). Samples are then dried, if necessary, and jaw crushed to approximately eight mesh. A 250 to 500 g subsample is taken and pulverized to 90% at 150 mesh, and then matted to ensure homogeneity. Silica sand is used to clean out the pulverizing dishes between each sample to prevent cross-contamination. The homogenized sample is then sent to the fire assay laboratory or the wet chemistry laboratory, depending on the analysis required.

Between September 2011 and April 2012, Actlabs processed some 18,170 drill core samples from the Property.

11.3.2 ALS CHEMEX

Upon arrival at the Timmins sample preparation facility, rock samples were entered into the LIMS. The average sample weight of split drill core is 2.2 kg. After drying, samples are crushed using a terminator jaw crusher such that 70% of material passes 2 mm. Crushed material is then riffle split and 1 kg is pulverized such that 85% of material passes 75 An extra 1 kg pulp is created for every tenth sample, for check analysis.

Between September 2011 and April 2012, ALS Chemex laboratories processed some 29,616 drill core samples from the Property.

11.4 ANALYTICAL P ROCEDURES

11.4.1 ACTIVATION LABORATORIES

Gold analysis is by way of fire assay of a 30 or 50 g pulp subsample. All samples are first subject to procedure 1A2-50 which uses atomic absorption spectroscopy (AAS). Any sample that returns grades higher than 1 g/t gold is re-assayed with a gravimetric finish, as per procedure 1A3.

Details below are sourced from Actlabs with some minor edits to correct spelling, grammar and consistency.

FIRE ASSAY-GRAVIMETRIC PROCEDURE FOR ORE GRADE SAMPLES

A sample size of 10 to 50 g can be used but the routine 30 g size is applied for rock pulps, soils or sediments (exploration samples). The sample is mixed with fire assay fluxes (borax, soda ash, silica, and litharge); the flux is free in silver. The mixture is placed in a fire clay crucible, the mixture is preheated at 850°C, intermediate 950°C and finish 1,060°C, the entire fusion process should last 60

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 71 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario minutes. The crucibles are then removed from the assay furnace and the molten slag (lighter material) is carefully poured from the crucible into a mould, leaving a lead button at the base of the mould. The lead button is then placed in a preheated cupel which absorbs the lead when cupelled at 950°C to recover the silver (doré bead) + gold. The cupellation of bead is controlled in the final point by the volatile of the silver. The silver bead is weighed and silver value calculated from the weight. Gold is separated from the silver in the doré bead by parting with nitric acid. The gold (roasting) flake remaining is weighed gravimetrically on a micro balance for gold. The detection limit for this procedure is 30 ppb.

GOLD FIRE ASSAY WITH AA FINISH FOR LOW TO MEDIUM GRADE SAMPLES

The method involves fire assay collection followed by cupellation, dissolution of the precious metal prill and a pre-concentration solvent extraction step. The final determination is by flame AAS, providing a detection limit of 5 ppb.

11.4.2 ALS CHEMEX

Gold analysis is by way of fire assay of a 30 or 50 g pulp subsample. All samples are first subject to procedure Au-AA23 which uses AAS. Any sample that returns grades higher than 1 g/t gold is re-assayed with a gravimetric finish, as per procedure Au-GRA21. Mineralized material grade samples also had an inductively coupled plasma (ICP) finish as opposed to an AAS finish on occasions, especially for high grade material.

Details below are sourced from ALS Chemex with some minor edits to correct spelling, grammar and consistency.

FIRE ASSAY-GRAVIMETRIC PROCEDURE FOR ORE GRADE SAMPLES

Gravimetric methods involve the use of balances to weigh the element of interest, either in its pure elemental form or as a chemical compound. One of the most common gravimetric determinations is that of gold and silver following a fire assay fusion cupellation. The precious metal bead that remains following cupellation is an alloy of silver and gold. Weighing this bead will give the total weight of silver and gold. If the bead is then treated with dilute nitric acid, it is possible to remove the silver quantitatively. The residual mass consists of pure gold which can then be weighed separately, thus allowing the silver to be determined by difference. The balances used for this purpose are microbalances capable of weighing to the nearest microgram (one millionth of a gram). Analysis of bullion for gold, silver and base metal content is another common procedure. The classical technique for determining gold is the fire assay fusion followed by cupellation and a gravimetric finish (method codes Au- GRA21, Au-GRA22 and Au-GRA24). This is still the preferred procedure for the analysis of high grade ores. There is no upper quantitative limit applied for

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 72 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario these procedures but clients should note that the detection limit is significantly higher than for procedures that use spectroscopic measurement techniques.

FIRE ASSAY-ATOMIC ABSORPTION PROCEDURES FOR LOW TO MEDIUM GRADE ORE SAMPLES

The method involves fire assay collection followed by cupellation, dissolution of the precious metal prill and a pre-concentration solvent extraction step. The final determination is by flame AAS, providing a detection limit of 5 ppb.

11.4.3 COARSE REJECT AND PULP STORAGE

Prodigy has the coarse rejects and pulps returned to the property for storage. Currently this material is stored on pallets outside at the old mine site. The exposure to the elements has been degrading the shrink wrap and the rice bags. Numerous samples bags were observed to have broken down and mixed the contents, thus destroying the integrity of the sample. Every effort should be made to place the pallets weather proof containers, such as a warehouse or sea containers. Prodigy has informed Tetra Tech that sea containers are in place and that the pulps are being transferred to them.

11.5 PRODIGY Q UALITY C ONTROL FOR 2011/2012

Prodigy collates and monitors all quality control data through Maxwell Geosciences Data Shed and QA/QC Reporter software on a batch basis.

Prodigy procedures ensured that there was at least one blank and one standard/CRM entered in every batch of 20 samples

Results for blank and standard assays are presented below. Prodigy has advised Tetra Tech that re-assays have been requested for instances where CRM assays fall outside of the control lines.

11.5.1 BLANK

Blank is not a certified blank material but has control limit of 50 ppb. Prodigy’s internal and external testing of this material has satisfied them that it is an acceptable blank material.

This blank material was inserted at a rate of about 1 in 20 samples. A total of 212 blank samples were inserted during the drilling campaign which represents about 0.31% of the sample database for this period (Figure 11.1).

Only two of the blank material values failed which represents about 1% of all the blank samples submitted for this period (September 2011 to June 2012). Although any failure during a QA/QC program should be investigated, the sizes of the failures were not enough to be of a serious concern for the purposes of this report.

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 73 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario Tetra Tech recommends that:

• Prodigy continues to use and monitor blank samples and flag any serious concerns with the laboratory staff, as soon as a failure is observed. • if possible, insert blank samples after known mineralized zones.

Figure 11.1 Blank QA/QC Chart

11.5.2 BLANK CDN-BL-8

The blank CDN-BL-8 is a certified blank material and has a recommended value of less than 10 ppb, with a failure limit of 30 ppb.

This blank material was inserted at a rate of about 1 in 20 samples. A total of 327 CDN-BL-8 samples were inserted during the drilling campaign which represents about 0.48% of the sample database for this period (Figure 11.2)

None of the CDN-BL-8 material values failed for samples submitted during this period (September 2011 to June 2012).

Tetra Tech recommends that:

• Prodigy continues to use and monitor blank samples and flag any serious concerns with the laboratory staff, as soon as a failure is observed. • if possible, -insert blank samples after known mineralized zones.

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 74 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario • if possible, replace the CDN-BL-08 with some locally sourced material that can be sufficiently used as a blank. The purpose of the blank QA/QC sample is to monitor the preparation laboratory crushing and pulverizing for cross contamination. A commercial blank is already crushed and pulverized.

Figure 11.2 CDN-BL-08 QA/QC Chart

11.5.3 BLANK CDN-BL-9

The blank CDN-BL-8 is a certified blank material and has a recommended value of less than 10 ppb, with a failure limit of 30 ppb.

This blank material was inserted at a rate of about 1 in 20 samples. A total of 1,485 CDN-BL-9 samples were inserted during the drilling campaign which represents about 2.19% of the sample database for this period (Figure 11.3)

Only four of the CDN-BL-9 material values failed which represents about 0.27% of all the CDN-BL-9 samples submitted for this period (September 2011 to June 2012). Although any failure during a QA/QC program should be investigated, the sizes of the failures were not enough to be of a serious concern for the purposes of this report.

Tetra Tech recommends that:

• Prodigy continues to use and monitor blank samples and flag any serious concerns with the laboratory staff, as soon as a failure is observed.

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 75 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario • if possible, insert blank samples after known mineralized zones • if possible, replace the CDN-BL-09 with some locally sourced material that can be sufficiently used as a blank. The purpose of the blank QA/QC sample is to monitor the preparation laboratory crushing and pulverizing for cross contamination. A commercial blank is already crushed and pulverized.

Figure 11.3 CDN-BL-09 QA/QC Chart

11.5.4 BLANK CDN-BL-10

The blank CDN-BL-10 is a certified blank material and has a recommended value of less than 10 ppb, with a failure limit of 30 ppb.

This blank material was inserted at a rate of about 1 in 20 samples. A total of 209 CDN-BL-10 samples were inserted during the drilling campaign which represents about 0.31% of the sample database for this period (Figure 11.4)

Only one of the CDN-BL-10 material values failed which represents about 0.5% of all the CDN-BL-10 samples submitted for this period (September 2011 to June 2012). Although any failure during a QA/QC program should be investigated, the sizes of the failures were not enough to be of a serious concern for the purposes of this report.

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 76 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario Tetra Tech recommends that:

• Prodigy continues to use and monitor blank samples and flag any serious concerns with the laboratory staff, as soon as a failure is observed. • if possible, insert blank samples after known mineralized zones. • if possible, replace the CDN-BL-10 with some locally sourced material that can be sufficiently used as a blank. The purpose of the blank QA/QC sample is to monitor the preparation laboratory crushing and pulverizing for cross contamination. A commercial blank is already crushed and pulverized.

Figure 11.4 CDN-BL-10 QA/QC Chart

11.5.5 DIABASE (COARSE)BLANK

Diabase blank is not a certified blank material but has control limit of 50 ppb. This blank material was inserted at a rate of about 1 in 20 samples. A total of 1,143 diabase blank samples were inserted during the drilling campaign which represents about 1.68% of the sample database for this period (Figure 11.5).

Sixty-two of the diabase blank material values failed which represents about 5% of all the blank samples submitted for this period (September 2011 to June 2012). Prodigy acknowledged issues with the coarse diabase blank material that was used during this period, and confirmed that it was not a good blank material as it evidently contains some anomalous grades for gold. However in the light of the good

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 77 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario performances of the other blanks used for this period, Tetra Tech is willing to accept the overall database for the purposes of this report.

Tetra Tech recommends that:

• Prodigy continues to use and monitor blank samples and flag any serious concerns with the laboratory staff, as soon as a failure is observed. • if possible, insert blank samples after known mineralized zones.

Figure 11.5 Diabase Blank QA/QC Chart

11.5.6 LOW GRADE STANDARD CDN-GS-P2

This low grade CRM CDN-GS-P2 has an accepted value of 0.214 g/t with a between lab’s 95th confidence of 0.02 g/t. The mean grade of the QA/QC samples submitted was 0.214 g/t, equal to the accepted value and within the confidence level set for between labs. There were no failures within the QA/QC sample suite submitted (Figure 11.6).

Overall there is some variance in the sample results throughout the campaign, which is evident in the moving range chart.

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 78 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario Figure 11.6 CDN-GS-P2 Process Performance Chart

11.5.7 LOW GRADE STANDARD CDN-GS-P2A

This low grade CRM CDN-GS-P2A has an accepted value of 0.229 g/t with a between lab’s 95th confidence of 0.03 g/t. The mean grade of the QA/QC samples submitted was 0.241 g/t, just slightly higher than the accepted value and well within the confidence level set for between labs. There was only one failure within the QA/QC sample suite submitted (sample #D143900). This failure should be examined further to determine the potential source of the error (Figure 11.7). It should be noted that it was not a significant failure.

Overall there is a lot of variance in the sample results throughout the campaign, which is evident in the moving range chart.

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 79 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario Figure 11.7 CDN-GS-P2A Process Performance Chart

11.5.8 LOW GRADE STANDARD CDN-GS-P3B

This low grade CRM CDN-GS-P3B has an accepted value of 0.409 g/t with a between lab’s 95th confidence of 0.042 g/t. The mean grade of the QA/QC samples submitted was 0.418 g/t, just slightly higher than the accepted value and well within the confidence level set for between labs. There was only three failures within the QA/QC sample suite submitted (sample #D131800, #D159400, and #D152080). These failures should be examined further to determine the potential source of the error (Figure 11.8). It seems likely that samples D131800 and D159400 were actually a blank material not this CRM.

Overall there is not a lot of variance in the sample results throughout the campaign, which is evident in the moving range chart.

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 80 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario Figure 11.8 CDN-GS-P3B Process Performance Chart

11.5.9 LOW GRADE STANDARD CDN-GS-P4A

This low grade CRM CDN-GS-P4A has an accepted value of 0.438 g/t with a between lab’s 95th confidence of 0.032g/t. The mean grade of the QA/QC samples submitted was 0.441 g/t, just slightly higher than the accepted value and well within the confidence level set for between labs. There was only two failures within the QA/QC sample suite submitted (sample #D125630, and #D128010). These failures should be examined further to determine the potential source of the error (Figure 11.9).

Overall there is quite a lot of variance in the sample results throughout the campaign, which is evident in the moving range chart.

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 81 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario Figure 11.9 CDN-GS-P4A Process Performance Chart

11.5.10 LOW GRADE STANDARD CDN-GS-P7E

This low grade CRM CDN-GS-P7E has an accepted value of 0.766 g/t with a between lab’s 95th confidence of 0.086 g/t. The mean grade of the QA/QC samples submitted was 0.779 g/t, just slightly higher than the accepted value and well within the confidence level set for between labs. There were six failures within the QA/QC sample suite submitted (sample #D109928, #D111440, #D112720, #D118990, #D101650, and #D160250). These failures should be examined further to determine the potential source of the error (Figure 11.10).

Overall there is a lot of variance in the sample results throughout the campaign, which is evident in the moving range chart.

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 82 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario Figure 11.10 CDN-GS-P7E Process Performance Chart

11.5.11 AVERAGE GRADE STANDARD CDN-GS-1G

This average grade CRM CDN-GS-1G has an accepted value of 1.14 g/t with a between lab’s 95th confidence of 0.09 g/t. The mean grade of the QA/QC samples submitted was 1.166 g/t, just slightly higher than the accepted value and well within the confidence level set for between labs. There was only one failure within the QA/QC sample suite submitted (sample #D097640). This failure should be examined further to determine the potential source of the error (Figure 11.11).

Overall there is a lot of variance in the sample results throughout the campaign, which is evident in the moving range chart.

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 83 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario Figure 11.11 CDN-GS-1G Process Performance Chart

11.5.12 AVERAGE GRADE STANDARD CDN-GS-1H

This average grade CRM CDN-GS-1H has an accepted value of 0.972 g/t with a between lab’s 95th confidence of 0.108 g/t. The mean grade of the QA/QC samples submitted was 0.989 g/t, just slightly higher than the accepted value and well within the confidence level set for between labs. There was no failures within the QA/QC sample suite submitted (Figure 11.12).

Overall there is a lot of variance in the sample results throughout the campaign, which is evident in the moving range chart.

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 84 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario Figure 11.12 CDN-GS-1H Process Performance Chart

11.5.13 AVERAGE GRADE STANDARD CDN-GS-1J

This average grade CRM CDN-GS-1J has an accepted value of 0.946 g/t with a between lab’s 95th confidence of 0.102 g/t. The mean grade of the QA/QC samples submitted was 0.962 g/t, just slightly higher than the accepted value and well within the confidence level set for between labs. There was no failures within the QA/QC sample suite submitted (Figure 11.13).

Overall there is not a lot of variance in the sample results throughout the campaign, which is evident in the moving range chart.

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 85 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario Figure 11.13 CDN-GS-1J Process Performance Chart

11.5.14 AVERAGE GRADE STANDARD CDN-GS-1P5C

This average grade CRM CDN-GS-1J has an accepted value of 1.56 g/t with a between lab’s 95th confidence of 0.13 g/t. The mean grade of the QA/QC samples submitted was 1.598 g/t, just slightly higher than the accepted value and well within the confidence level set for between labs. There were no failures within the QA/QC sample suite submitted (Figure 11.14).

Overall there is not a lot of variance in the sample results throughout the campaign, which is evident in the moving range chart.

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 86 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario Figure 11.14 CDN-GS-1P5C Process Performance Chart

11.5.15 AVERAGE GRADE STANDARD CDN-GS-1P5D

This average grade CRM CDN-GS-1J has an accepted value of 1.47 g/t with a between lab’s 95th confidence of 0.15 g/t. The mean grade of the QA/QC samples submitted was 1.451 g/t, just slightly lower than the accepted value and well within the confidence level set for between labs. There were five failures within the QA/QC sample suite submitted (sample #D109010, #D122940, #D127900, #D128390, and #D157530). These failures should be examined further to determine the potential source of the error (Figure 11.15). It seems likely that D127900 was actually a blank material not a standard CRM.

Overall there is some variance in the sample results throughout the campaign, which is evident in the moving range chart.

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 87 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario Figure 11.15 CDN-GS-1P5D Process Performance Chart

11.5.16 MODERATE GRADE STANDARD CDN-GS-2G

This moderate grade CRM CDN-GS-2G has an accepted value of 2.26 g/t with a between lab’s 95th confidence of 0.19 g/t. The mean grade of the QA/QC samples submitted was 2.299 g/t, just slightly higher than the accepted value and well within the confidence level set for between labs. There were no failures within the QA/QC sample suite submitted (Figure 11.16).

Overall there is some variance in the sample results throughout the campaign, which is evident in the moving range chart.

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 88 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario Figure 11.16 CDN-GS-2G Process Performance Chart

11.5.17 MODERATE GRADE STANDARD CDN-GS-2J

This moderate grade CRM CDN-GS-2J has an accepted value of 2.36 g/t with a between lab’s 95th confidence of 0.2 g/t. The mean grade of the QA/QC samples submitted was 2.412 g/t, just slightly higher than the accepted value and well within the confidence level set for between labs. There was one failure within the QA/QC sample suite submitted (sample #D124540). This failure should be examined further to determine the potential source of the error (Figure 11.17).

Overall there is some variance in the sample results throughout the campaign, which is evident in the moving range chart.

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 89 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario Figure 11.17 CDN-GS-2J Process Performance Chart

11.5.18 MODERATE GRADE STANDARD CDN-GS-2K

This moderate grade CRM CDN-GS-2K has an accepted value of 1.97 g/t with a between lab’s 95th confidence of 0.18 g/t. The mean grade of the QA/QC samples submitted was 1.949 g/t, just slightly lower than the accepted value and well within the confidence level set for between labs. There were two failures within the QA/QC sample suite submitted (sample #D130870 and #D148910). These failures should be examined further to determine the potential source of the error (Figure 11.18).

Overall there is some variance in the sample results throughout the campaign, which is evident in the moving range chart.

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 90 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario Figure 11.18 CDN-GS-2K Process Performance Chart

11.5.19 HIGH GRADE STANDARD CDN-GS-3G

This high grade CRM CDN-GS-3G has an accepted value of 2.59 g/t with a between lab’s 95th confidence of 0.18 g/t. The mean grade of the QA/QC samples submitted was 2.60 g/t, just slightly higher than the accepted value and well within the confidence level set for between labs. There was no failures within the QA/QC sample suite submitted (Figure 11.19).

Overall there is low variance in the sample results throughout the campaign, which is evident in the moving range chart.

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 91 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario Figure 11.19 CDN-GS-3G Process Performance Chart

11.5.20 HIGH GRADE STANDARD CDN-GS-3H

This high grade CRM CDN-GS-3H has an accepted value of 3.04 g/t with a between lab’s 95th confidence of 0.23 g/t. The mean grade of the QA/QC samples submitted was 2.978 g/t, just slightly lower than the accepted value and well within the confidence level set for between labs. There was nine failures within the QA/QC sample suite submitted (sample #D115730, #D122920, #D125550, #D098519, #D101910, #D100880, #D128550, #D134090 and #876790). These failures should be examined further to determine the potential source of the error (Figure 11.20). It seems likely that sample #D098519 and #876790 were actually blank material and not standard CRM material. Prodigy informed Tetra Tech that sample #D128550 is apparently a pass as it was determined by gravimetric means.

Overall there is minor variance in the sample results throughout the campaign, which is evident in the moving range chart.

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 92 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario Figure 11.20 CDN-GS-3H Process Performance Chart

11.5.21 HIGH GRADE STANDARD CDN-GS-3J

This high grade CRM CDN-GS-3J has an accepted value of 2.71 g/t with a between lab’s 95th confidence of 0.26 g/t. The mean grade of the QA/QC samples submitted was 2.63 g/t, just slightly lower than the accepted value and well within the confidence level set for between labs. There was six failures within the QA/QC sample suite submitted (sample #D123180, #D103500, #D134190, #D135490, #D135610 and #D150340). These failures should be examined further to determine the potential source of the error (Figure 11.21). It seems likely that sample #D123180 and #D103500 were actually blank material and not standard CRM material.

Overall there is minor variance in the sample results throughout the campaign, which is evident in the moving range chart.

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 93 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario Figure 11.21 CDN-GS-3J Process Performance Chart

11.5.22 HIGH GRADE STANDARD CDN-GS-4B

This high grade CRM CDN-GS-4B has an accepted value of 3.77 g/t with a between lab’s 95th confidence of 0.35 g/t. The mean grade of the QA/QC samples submitted was 3.801 g/t, just slightly higher than the accepted value and well within the confidence level set for between labs. There was two failures within the QA/QC sample suite submitted (sample # 134520 and #D160230). These failures should be examined further to determine the potential source of the error (Figure 11.22). It seems likely that sample #D134520 was actually blank material and not standard CRM material.

Overall there is minor variance in the sample results throughout the campaign, which is evident in the moving range chart.

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 94 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario Figure 11.22 CDN-GS-4B Process Performance Chart

11.5.23 HIGH GRADE STANDARD CDN-GS-4D

This high grade CRM CDN-GS-4D has an accepted value of 3.81 g/t with a between lab’s 95th confidence of 0.25 g/t. The mean grade of the QA/QC samples submitted was 3.805 g/t, just slightly lower than the accepted value and well within the confidence level set for between labs. There was eight failures within the QA/QC sample suite submitted (sample #D110330, #D109580, #D119710, #D122520, #D124520, #D123190, #D127510 and #D100760). These failures should be examined further to determine the potential source of the error (Figure 11.23).

Overall there is quite a lot of variance in the sample results throughout the campaign, which is evident in the moving range chart.

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 95 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario Figure 11.23 CDN-GS-4D Process Performance Chart

11.5.24 ULTRA HIGH GRADE STANDARD CDN-GS-7B

This ultra-high grade CRM CDN-GS-7B has an accepted value of 6.42 g/t with a between lab’s 95th confidence of 0.46 g/t. The mean grade of the QA/QC samples submitted was 6.421 g/t, just slightly higher than the accepted value and well within the confidence level set for between labs. There was one failure within the QA/QC sample suite submitted (sample #D131460). This failure should be examined further to determine the potential source of the error (Figure 11.24).

Overall there is quite a lot of variance in the sample results throughout the campaign, which is evident in the moving range chart.

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 96 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario Figure 11.24 CDN-GS-7B Process Performance Chart

11.5.25 ULTRA HIGH GRADE STANDARD CDN-GS-14A

This ultra-high grade CRM CDN-GS-14A has an accepted value of 14.90 g/t with a between lab’s 95th confidence of 0.87 g/t. The mean grade of the QA/QC samples submitted was 14.831 g/t, just slightly lower than the accepted value and well within the confidence level set for between labs. There was no failures within the QA/QC sample suite submitted (Figure 11.25).

Overall there is quite a lot of variance in the sample results throughout the campaign, which is evident in the moving range chart.

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 97 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario Figure 11.25 CDN-GS-14A Process Performance Chart

11.5.26 ULTRA HIGH GRADE STANDARD CDN-GS-30B

This ultra-high grade CRM CDN-GS-30B has an accepted value of 29.21 g/t with a between lab’s 95th confidence of 1.23 g/t. The mean grade of the QA/QC samples submitted was 29.06 g/t, just slightly lower than the accepted value and well within the confidence level set for between labs. There was no failures within the QA/QC sample suite submitted (Figure 11.26).

Overall there is some variance in the sample results throughout the campaign, which is evident in the moving range chart.

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 98 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario Figure 11.26 CDN-GS-30B Process Performance Chart

11.5.27 QA/QC OPPORTUNITIES

There are several opportunities for Prodigy to improve on the QA/QC program currently in place:

• Currently three commercial blanks are being used. The commercial blanks will not test for contamination in the preparation facility as the material is already crushed and pulverized. Replace commercial blanks with a material that required crushing and pulverizing and is devoid of gold mineralization. • Reduce the number of difference standards being used in the program. Currently five low grade, five average grade, three moderate grade, five high grade and three ultra-high grade samples for a total of 21 different standards are being used. Best to select a minimum of three and a maximum of five standards that best represent the deposit grade distribution. Typically one standards at or around the expected cut-off grade, one average grade standard and one high grade that would represent material in the 90th percentile. • Ensure that the standards being used have a similar rock matrix as the mineralization being checked. Noticed that at least two of the standards were generated from material sourced from Nevada Basin and Range deposits and one standard was sourced from an oxide deposit. The different rock matrix will be digested differently than the Magino host rock, which could skew the result.

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 99 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario • Prodigy should investigate the possibility of generating their own standard from the stockpiles located on surface. The rock matrix is identical and can result in a more cost effective method.

11.5.28 QP OPINION

The author is satisfied that the sample preparation, security and analytical procedures are adequate for the purposes of this report. Despite some variability outside the standard limits, Tetra Tech is satisfied that there is no significant bias in the laboratory analysis.

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 100 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario 12.0 DATA VERIFICATION

Tetra Tech carried out several internal validations of the diamond drillhole data against the original drill logs and assay certificates. The validation of assay files against the certificates was carried out on 172 of the holes drilled by Prodigy between September 2011 and June 2012, which equates to 71% of the holes drilled in this period and 14% of the database provided as a whole. For all the 1,193 assay records checked that were greater than 2 g/t there was a 100% match between the database records and the certificates. Data verification was also completed on collar coordinates, end-of-hole depths, down-hole survey measurements, from and to intervals, measurements of assay sampling intervals, and gold grades for about 35% of the database provided, and no major issues were found.

In August 2012, Tetra Tech carried out rigorous validation of the pre-1999 surface drillholes and underground drillholes (greater than 50 m), to enable them to be included in this resource estimate. A minimum of 10% of these drillholes were checked for collar co-ordinates, end-of-hole depths, down-hole survey measurements, from and to intervals, measurements of assay sampling intervals, and gold grades. Error rates were generally within acceptable parameters.

When the data tables were imported into Vulcan™ v.8.1.0 which has its own error checking routines there was some overlapping interval issues in the assay and lithology tables, but these were corrected at the time of importing the data with fixes in most cases provided by Prodigy personnel.

Mr. Todd McCracken, P.Geo., Principal Geologist with Tetra Tech visited the Property, from May 8 to 9, 2012. Mr. McCracken was accompanied by Mr. Michael Simpson, P.Geo. with Prodigy. Mr. McCracken examined the Project setting, reviewed numerous drill collar sites, geological logs, and assay certificates and drill core from the storage facility.

Tetra Tech was able to observe the core handling, logging and sampling procedures being done by Prodigy and concludes that the procedures meet industry standards. Tetra Tech confirmed the locations of five surface boreholes collars during the site visit. Tetra Tech collected the collar locations using a Garmin GPSMAP 60Cx handheld GPS unit. All collar locations were located within the acceptable error limit of the GPS unit (Table 12.1).

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 101 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario Table 12.1 Drill Collar Validation

Prodigy Tetra Tech Borehole Elevation Elevation ID Northing Easting (m) Northing Easting (m) MA11-075 5351266 689002 402 5351269 689006 401 MA11-110 5351294 689035 400 5351299 689035 395 MA11-113 5351286 689079 398 5351289 689076 394 GT-12-10 5350971 689082 387 5350972 689088 415

Eleven independent samples of mineralized course rejects were collected for check assaying representing different styles of mineralization and different zone within the deposit. The samples were bagged, sealed on-site and transported personally by Mr. McCracken to Tetra Tech’s Sudbury office. On arrival at the office, the bag was opened for verification purposes, resealed and personally delivered to the ALS Chemex preparation facility in Sudbury, Ontario. The pulps are then sent by courier to the ALS Chemex laboratory facility in Vancouver, British Columbia, which is accredited to ISO/International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) 17025, for independent assaying. The samples were analyzed for gold, using analysis packages Au-GRAV22 (50 g fire assay, with gravimetric finish) (Table 12.2). The coarse rejects were used in place of quarter core in order to avoid the potential of coarse gold skewing the results. In addition samples were selected in a manner to avoid samples with observed visible gold.

Table 12.2 Drill Core Validation

Prodigy Tetra Tech Borehole Au Sample Au ID Interval (g/t) No. (g/t) MA11-141 309-310 0.374 J350900 0.337 MA11-167 504-505 0.217 J350901 0.015 MA11-163 240-241 0.199 J350902 0.164 MA11-163 241-242 0.197 J350903 0.205 MA11-163 242-243 0.110 J350904 0.109 MA11-163 245-246 0.133 J350905 0.128 CDN-BL-10 - <0.005 J350906 <0.005 MA11-203 319-320 1.050 J350907 0.916 MA11-203 320-321 1.095 J350908 0.577 CDN-GS-2K - 1.970 J350909 1.980 MA11-230 321-322 1.245 J350910 1.345

Tetra Tech believes the sampling practices of Prodigy meets current industry standards. Tetra Tech also believes that the sample database provided by Prodigy and validated by Tetra Tech is suitable to support mineral resource estimation.

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 102 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario 13.0 MINERAL PROCESSING AND METALLURGICAL TESTING

Historical and current metallurgical test work programs have been carried out for the Property. Below is a list of the reports from these test programs.

• Lakefield Research Limited (Lakefield); “An Investigation of The Recovery of Gold from Magino Project Samples – October 1997” • Kappes, Cassiday & Associates (KCA); “Magino Project Report of Metallurgical Tests – January 1999” • G&T Metallurgical Services Limited (G&T); “Gravity Concentration/Cyanide Leaching on Variability Samples from the Magino Deposit – September 2011” • Starkey & Associates Inc. (Starkey); “Magino Project SAGDesign Comminution Analysis and Mill Design – October 2011”.

The Lakefield, KCA, Starkey, and G&T September 2011 test programs were undertaken prior to the review by Tetra Tech and the following sections summarize the data presented in each of these test reports. A test program is presently in progress at G&T and the results will be reported in the forthcoming prefeasibility study.

13.1 LAKEFIELD R ESEARCH –OCTOBER 1997

Lakefield had been asked to complete a metallurgical test program in support of a prefeasibility study being carried out by BLM for Golden Goose. The study proposed a 2.6 t/a open pit mine and a leach plant. The Lakefield work tested gravity separation, cyanidation, and heap leaching. Drill core and bulk samples were selected by BLM for this test work and were deemed by BLM to be representative of the future operations. The head assays for the different composites are presented in Table 13.1.

Table 13.1 Lakefield Research (1997) – Head Assays

Au* Au** Ag S Composite (g/t) (g/t) (g/t) (%) 1 1.37 1.15 <0.5 0.29 2 0.96 0.82 <0.5 0.19 Source: Lakefield (1997) Notes: *Average of pulp and metallic assay **Average calculated gold head assays (excluding heap leach tests)

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 103 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario The Bond Work Index (BWI) tests were completed and an average BWI of 12.7 kWh/t was determined. The gravity separation work by Lakefield showed moderate gold recoveries for the samples tested. Table 13.2 is a tabulation of the gravity separation results from Lakefield. The tests were carried out on two composites at similar grind size which were subjected to a laboratory sized Knelson concentrator. The Knelson concentrate was then cleaned on a Mozley mineral separator. Composite 1 was believed to be a more representative sample and gave a gravity recovery of 24% gold, while 55.8% was recovered from the Composite 2 sample.

Table 13.2 Gravity Separation Test Results

Test -74 µm Weight Assay Distribution No. Composite (%) Product (%) (g/t Au) (% Au) G1 1 72 Mozley Conc 0.016 1636 24.0 Mozley Tail +105 μm 0.059 206 11.3 Mozley Tail -105 μm 0.88 29.8 24.1 Knelson Conc 0.95 67.6 59.4 Knelson Tail 99.05 0.44 40.6 Head (calc) 100.00 1.08 100.0 G2 2 54 Mozley Conc 0.051 781 55.8 Mozley Tail +105 μm 0.28 10.5 4.1 Mozley Tail -105 μm 0.63 21.1 18.5 Knelson Conc 0.96 58.7 78.3 Knelson Tail 99.04 0.16 21.7 Head (calc) 100.00 0.72 100.0 Source: Lakefield (1997)

The test work also encompassed gold cyanidation. Bottle roll leach tests of 48 hour duration were used to determine the effect of the fineness of grind on the gold recovery. The tests were performed at 33% solids. The test results are shown in Table 13.3.

Table 13.3 Cyanidation Results

Reagent Consumption Extraction (kg/t) (%, Au) Test -74 µm NaCN Residue Head No. Composite (%) (g/L) NaCN Lime 24 h 48 h (g/t Au) (g/t Au) CN1 1 84 1.0 0.30 0.48 85 97.8 0.03 1.34 CN3 1 72 0.5 0.13 0.46 75 92.2 0.08 1.03 CN5 1 60 0.5 0.13 0.50 71 92.6 0.07 0.95 CN2 2 84 1.0 0.37 0.57 83 92.0 0.06 0.75 CN4 2 72 0.5 0.15 0.48 81 95.6 0.04 0.90 CN6 2 59 0.5 0.14 0.51 77 93.4 0.05 0.76 Source: Lakefield (1997)

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 104 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario The residue gold assays are low which illustrates that the cyanide leach was effective for both sample composites. The average 48-hour cyanidation gold recovery for Composite 1 is 94.2% and 93.7% for Composite 2. The gold recovery for Composite 1 is slightly higher as a result of slightly higher head assays for the Composite 1 samples tested. The correlation between higher grade and higher gold recovery can be seen by comparing the individual tests. Based on these tests a reduction in grind size from 60% to 72% passing 74 μm did not measurably change the gold recovery or residue assay (i.e. the sample is not very sensitive to grind in this size range).

Heap leach tests were also carried out using column leach and carbon columns. The test results are presented in Table 13.4. The column leach tests were carried out on 12 mm and 3.4 mm crush sizes. The 3.4 mm crush size material was agglomerated using 0.5 kg/t CaO, 20 kg/t cement, and cured for four days.

The column leach work was carried out in 100 mm diameter columns at a pH of 11. The columns recirculated 1 g/L NaCN solution at 10 L/h/m2. Pregnant solution was passed through a carbon column and the carbon was removed periodically to be assayed for gold. The column was run for 42 days and the residue was drained, washed, screened, and assayed.

There was an inconsistency in the effect of crush size on gold recovery. The results for Composite 1 do not appear to show any significant increased recovery at the smaller crush size as would be expected. Composite 2 shows an increase in recovery with the smaller crush size. Overall, in comparison to the bottle roll tests, the column leach recoveries are significantly lower, as expected, with the maximum dissolution observed being about 68%. Reagent consumptions are relatively low for both cyanide and lime for the bottle roll and column leach tests, namely between 1.0 and 1.4 kg/t for cyanide and 0.5 to 0.6 kg/t for lime.

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 105 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario Table 13.4 Heap Leach Results

Reagent Consumption Recovery (kg/t) (% Au) Test Feed Residue Head No. Composite Size NaCN Lime 1d 3d 7d 14d 21d 28d 35d 42d (g/t Au) (g/t Au) HL1 1 -12 mm 1.37 0.46 17.3 27.3 36.7 45.8 51.1 55.2 58.4 60.7 0.28 0.75 HL2 2 -12 mm 1.31 0.53 10.0 19.0 25.5 35.5 40.5 43.6 46.1 47.9 0.42 0.84 HL3 1 -6 mesh 0.98 0.59 6.9 19.1 29.8 40.2 45.4 50.3 52.9 55.1 0.38 0.88 HL4 2 -6 mesh 0.96 0.59 6.5 20.7 35.6 52.1 59.7 63.3 66.1 68.1 0.21 0.71 Source: Lakefield (1997)

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 106 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario 13.2 KAPPES,CASSIDAY &ASSOCIATES –JANUARY 1999

The test report from KCA presented the results for tests performed on NQ drill core selected by Golden Goose from the Magino site which represented the Mafic Volcanics and the Granodiorite area. These samples were used for column leach and bottle roll tests. The Mafic Volcanics average gold head grade was 1.08 g/t compared with 1.32 g/t for the Granodiorite samples.

The column leach results are presented in Table 13.5. The crush sizes chosen for these column leach tests were minus 22.4 mm and minus 9.5 mm. The results show that even at the finer 9.5 mm crushed size, the gold recovery from the column leach is low with an average of 52.8% The results do however reflect that the finer crush size does increase the gold recovery. KCA recommended that the laboratory column leach gold recovery values be reduced by 3 to 5% to model field results. By KCA’s estimation, the Mafic Volcanics would be assumed to have a field recovery of approximately 45% gold for the 9.5 mm material and 51% gold for the Granodiorite material at a crush size of 9.5 mm.

Table 13.5 Summary of Column Leach Test Results

KCA KCA Crush Calculated Sample Test Magino Size Days Head Recovery Recovery No. No. ID (mm) Leach (g/t Au) (g/t Au) (%) 27088 A 27120 Mafic Volcanics -22.4 63 0.94 0.35 37.2 27088 B 27123 Mafic Volcanics -9.5 63 1.60 0.79 49.5 27089 B 27126 Granodiorite -22.4 63 1.72 0.56 32.5 27088 C 27129 Granodiorite -9.5 63 1.41 0.79 56.0 - - Average -22.4 63 - - 34.9 - - Average -9.5 63 - - 52.8 Source: KCA (1999)

The results from the bottle roll tests are presented below in Table 13.6. Samples crushed to minus 9.5 mm and another sample at a grind size of 0.150 mm (150 μm) were subjected to the bottle roll tests. The average gold recovery at a grind size of 150 μm was 95%. Both samples appeared to be amenable to the agitated cyanide leaching modeled by the bottle roll tests. The 9.5 mm material had a very low recovery which is possibly due to less liberated gold at that particle size and the low residence time in the cyanide.

Closer analysis of the tails residue and head grades revealed that further size reduction to a finer grind size would most likely liberate the gold further which should be easily recovered by agitated cyanide leaching. The gold recovery by agitated cyanidation is significantly higher than the gold recovery by column leach.

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 107 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario Table 13.6 Summary of Bottle Leach Test Results

KCA KCA Crush Calculated Average Metal Sample Test Magino Size Head Tail Extracted Days No. No. ID (mm) (g/t Au) (g/t Au) (% Au) Leaching 27088 27116 A Mafic Volcanics -0.150 0.73 0.05 93.2 2 27088 B 27116 C Mafic Volcanics -9.500 0.85 0.54 36.5 4 27089 27116 B Granodiorite -0.150 1.57 0.05 96.8 2 27089 C 27185 A Granodiorite -9.500 1.61 1.12 30.4 4 - - Average -0.150 - - 95.0 2 - - Average -9.500 - - 33.5 4 Source: KCA (1999)

The cyanide and lime consumptions for the bottle roll and column leach test work are shown in Table 13.7. As seen in the Lakefield work, the average reagent consumptions for both the bottle roll and column leach test work are low at between 0.3 and 0.6 kg/t for cyanide and 0.5 and 0.7 kg/t for lime.

Table 13.7 Summary of Reagent Consumption

KCA Test KCA NaCN Lime Sample Type Test Magino Consumed Consumed No. No. ID (kg/t) (kg/t) 27088 Bottle 27116 A Mafic Volcanics 0.49 1.0 27088 B Bottle 27116 C Mafic Volcanics 0.12 0.5 27089 Bottle 27116 B Granodiorite 0.45 0.8 27089 C Bottle 27185 A Granodiorite 0.23 0.3 27088 A Column 27120 Mafic Volcanic 0.60 0.5 27088 B Column 27123 Mafic Volcanic 0.70 0.5 27089 B Column 27126 Granodiorite 0.55 0.5 27089 C Column 27129 Granodiorite 0.54 0.5 - - Average Bottle Roll 0.32 0.7 - - Average Column Leach 0.60 0.5 Source: KCA (1999)

13.3 G&T METALLURGICAL S ERVICES L TD.–SEPTEMBER 2011

G&T completed test work in September 2011 on 20 NQ drill core variability samples supplied to them by Prodigy. The test work conducted included gravity concentration and bottle roll leach tests. Gravity concentration tests were conducted using a laboratory scale Knelson concentrator. The Knelson concentrate was subsequently hand panned. The pan tailings and the Knelson tailings were combined and subjected to 48 hour bottle roll tests (cyanidation). The primary grind for all of the feed for the test work was 80% passing 75 μm with an average gold feed head grade of 1.0 g/t (ranging from 0.10 to 7.34 g/t). The silver head grades were all below 1 g/t with the exception of one sample which was 2 g/t. The assayed head grades are

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 108 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario presented in Table 13.8. Target sodium cyanide concentration for the bottle roll tests was 250 ppm. The test flowsheet is illustrated below in Figure 13.1.

Figure 13.1 Test Flowsheet

Source: G&T (September 2011)

Table 13.8 Assay Head Grades

Assay (g/t) Au Ag Sample (g/t) (g/t) 876501 0.26 0.5 876502 0.07 0.3 876503 4.71 0.5 876504 0.27 0.3 876505 0.68 0.5 876506 0.18 0.4 876507 1.46 0.5 876508 0.19 0.3 876509 1.14 0.7 876510 0.52 0.4 876511 7.34 0.6 876512 0.25 0.2 876513 0.56 0.3 876514 0.90 0.2 876515 1.12 2.0 876516 0.13 0.2 876517 1.30 0.7 876518 0.10 0.5 876519 0.08 0.6 876520 0.13 0.9 Source: G&T (September 2011)

The test results from the gravity concentration and the cyanidation are presented in Table 13.9. The gold head grade values varied considerably. An average 33% of the gold was concentrated by gravity concentration using the Knelson concentrator

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 109 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario and panning. The average gravity gold concentrate grade was 115 g/t. The average overall gold extraction was 92% using gravity separation followed by a 48 h cyanide leach. The overall average silver recovery was 47%. The average reagent consumption was very low at 0.02 kg/t of cyanide and 0.67 kg/t for lime.

Table 13.9 Gold Extraction Test Results

Pan Reagent Concentrate Cyanide Overall Consumption Recovery Extraction Extraction Feed (kg/t) Au Ag Au Ag Au Ag Au Test Sample (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (g/t) NaCN Lime 1/22 876501 23 4 61 46 70 48 0.26 0.04 0.72 2/23 876502 12 1 58 18 63 19 0.07 <0.01 0.74 3/11 876503 44 3 96 39 98 41 5.20 0.04 0.88 4/24 876504 29 8 94 31 96 37 0.36 0.02 0.68 5/25 876505 20 7 85 63 88 66 0.68 <0.01 0.86 6/26 876506 21 1 88 10 90 11 0.18 0.02 0.46 7/27 876507 27 2 92 56 94 57 1.46 <0.01 0.46 8/28 876508 35 1 91 71 94 71 0.15 0.02 0.56 9/29 876509 22 3 88 35 91 37 1.14 0.02 0.62 10/30 876510 11 1 84 52 86 52 0.52 <0.01 0.76 12/31 876511 34 17 98 97 99 98 5.99 <0.01 0.68 13/32 876512 30 6 94 30 96 34 0.25 <0.01 0.48 14/33 876513 58 13 98 91 99 92 0.56 0.02 0.8 15/34 876514 75 11 94 30 99 38 0.22 <0.01 0.68 16/35 876515 60 30 91 74 96 82 0.81 0.02 0.74 17/36 876516 50 4 80 30 90 33 0.13 0.02 0.84 18/37 876517 44 7 98 56 99 59 1.55 0.02 0.6 19/38 876518 6 1 96 10 97 11 0.10 0.02 0.66 20/39 876519 39 2 95 24 97 25 0.08 0.02 0.66 24/40 876520 20 2 97 22 97 24 0.13 <0.01 0.58 Average - 33 6 89 44 92 47 0.99 0.02 0.67 Source: G&T (September 2011)

13.4 STARKEY &ASSOCIATES I NC.–OCTOBER 2011

Four HQ drill core samples were supplied to Starkey in order to complete preliminary sizing of the comminution circuit. The test results from the work completed by Process Research Ortech (an accredited SAGDesign testing laboratory) are summarized below.

Table 13.10 summarizes the results of the “SAGDesign” test work. The design SAG th Power Index (WSAG) was determined to be 11.50 kWh/t (75 percentile mineralized material hardness – average of two hardest mineralized material samples). The design BWI was determined to be 15.91 kWh/t (75th percentile mineralized material

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 110 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario hardness – average of two hardest mineralized material samples). According to

Starkey’s database, the WSAG indicates that the samples were considered hard mineralized material competency for SAG milling and the BWI was considered moderate to hard competency for ball mill grinding.

Table 13.10 Summary of SAGDesign Test Work Results and Calculated Parameters

Project Identification SAGDesign Test Work Results Calculated Parameters

SG Calc WSAG SAG Dis. Macro/ Calc WBM Total WT Sample Sample Solids to 1.7 mm Bond BWI Micro to P80 to P80 No. Description (g/cm3) (kWh/t) (kWh/t) Ratio (kWh/t) (kWh/t) 1 876286 2.64 11.76 16.97 0.69 15.61 27.36 2 876282 2.67 11.15 13.71 0.81 12.61 23.76 3 876283 2.87 10.96 13.73 0.80 12.63 23.59 4 876284 2.86 11.25 14.85 0.76 13.66 24.91 Average 2.76 11.28 14.81 0.77 13.63 24.91 Design Data 2.76 11.50 15.91 0.72 14.63 26.14 Source: Starkey (October 2011)

Table 13.11 presents six case studies which Starkey used to determine the comminution circuit design. The text in red (i.e. Case 3a) was the selected scenario for the grinding mill sizing. The mill sizes selected by Starkey were based on a 17,500 t/d throughput. A pebble crusher was also suggested for increasing the throughput to 20,000 t/d in the future. Starkey advised that the pebble crusher would not be required for start-up.

The SAG mill size selected was a 10.363 m (34 ft) in diameter and 5.004 m (16.4 ft) equivalent grinding length. This was calculated to require an 11,600 kW twin pinion variable speed synchronous motor (5,800 kW per pinion). Two 6.096 m diameter (20 ft) ball mills which are 8.731 m (27.5 ft) long would also be required, along with two 5,700 kW single pinion fixed speed motors to drive the ball mills.

The report indicated that the four samples tested were sufficient for a preliminary sizing of equipment, but a larger representative sample should be used before any procurement strategies are considered. Hard samples were used in the grinding studies, to enhance the level of confidence in the comminution analysis.

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 111 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario Table 13.11 Summary of Calculated Mill Sizes and Grinding Equipment

Motor Installed Diam. ID EGL Aspect Drive Disch. D80 Calc. Req. Feed Rate Equipment Quantity (ft) (ft) Ratio (% Crit.) RPM (µm) (kW) kW HP (t/h – kt/d) th Case 1a: 17.5 kt/d SAG mill + ball mill circuit, F80 = 152 mm, T80 = 1,700 µm (base case), 75 percentile mineralized material hardness Crusher 0 SAG Mill 1 34.0 16.9 2.02 75 9.9 1,700 10,715 11,900 15,958 784.1 Ball Mill 1 24.0 31.6 1.32 75 11.9 74 10,294 10,300 13,812 17.5 Total Installed Power 21,010 22,200 29,770 th Case 1b: 17.5 kt/d SAG mill + 2 ball mills circuit, F80 = 152 mm, T80 = 1,700 µm (base case), 75 percentile mineralized material hardness Crusher 0 SAG Mill 1 34.0 16.9 2.02 75 9.9 1,700 10,715 11,900 15,958 784.1 Ball Mill 2 20.0 26.1 1.31 75 13.0 74 5,343 5,400 7,241 17.5 Total Installed Power 21,401 22,700 30,441 th Case 2a: 20 kt/d SAG mill + ball mill circuit, F80 = 152 mm, T80 = 1,700 µm (base case), 75 percentile mineralized material hardness Crusher 0 SAG Mill 1 36.0 16.7 2.16 75 9.6 1700 12,246 13,600 18,238 898.1 Ball Mill 1 24.0 36.1 1.50 75 11.9 74 11,765 11,800 15,824 20.0 Total Installed Power 24,011 25,400 34,061 th Case 2b: 20 kt/d SAG mill + 2 ball mills circuit, F80 = 152 mm, T80 = 1,700 µm (base case), 75 percentile mineralized material hardness Crusher 0 SAG Mill 1 36.0 16.7 2.16 75 9.6 1700 12,246 13,600 18,238 896.1 Ball Mill 2 20.0 29.9 1.49 75 13.0 74 6,106 6,200 8,314 20.0 Total Installed Power 24,459 26,000 34,866 table continues…

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 112 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario Motor Installed Diam. ID EGL Aspect Drive Disch. D80 Calc. Req. Feed Rate Equipment Quantity (ft) (ft) Ratio (% Crit.) RPM (µm) (kW) kW HP (t/h – kt/d) th Case 3a: 20 kt/d SABC circuit with 2 ball mills, F80 = 152 mm, T80 = 1,000 µm, 75 percentile mineralized material hardness Recommended Design Crusher 1 600 805 SAG Mill 1 34.0 16.4 2.07 75 9.9 1,000 10,432 11,600 15,556 896.1 Ball Mill 2 20.0 27.5 1.37 75 13.0 74 5,617 5,700 7,644 20.0 Total Installed Power 21,667 23,600 31,648 Case 3b: Calc t/d start-up with 1 SAG mill + 2 ball mills (Case 2a mill sizes), F80 = 152 mm, T80 = 2,233 µm, 75th percentile hardness Crusher 0 SAG Mill 1 34.0 16.4 2.07 75 9.9 2,233 10,432 11,600 15,556 797.4 Ball Mill 2 20.0 27.5 1.37 75 13.0 74 5,617 5,700 7,644 17.8 Total Installed Power 21,666 2,300 30,843 Source: Starkey (October 2011)

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 113 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario 13.5 G&T METALLURGICAL S ERVICES L TD. – 2012

Samples for the current metallurgical test program at G&T were selected by Prodigy in order to be considered representative of the current open pit scenario. The metallurgical test program in progress at G&T encompasses the following:

• comminution tests • master composite optimization and variability cyanidation bottle roll leach tests • historical waste rock and historical tailings cyanidation bottle roll leach tests • carbon adsorption tests • cyanide detoxification • acid rock drainage testing of the tailings • mineralogical test work • twelve column leach tests.

Third party thickener settling tests and vacuum filtration tests are also being carried out. The metallurgical test program at G&T has not been completed to date and no results can be presented at this stage. Further details regarding the test program results will be available in the forthcoming prefeasibility study.

13.6 CONCLUSIONS

Tetra Tech provides the following conclusions:

• Based on the test results from the three historical leach programs, there does not appear to be a “preg-robbing” component present in the samples that were tested. • The samples have been taken from the random areas of the deposit highlighting the Mafic Volcanics and Granodiorite in the selections. • The gold extraction by cyanide leaching has centered around 92% gold recovery for the three historical cyanidation test programs.

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 114 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario 14.0 MINERAL RESOURCE ESTIMATES

14.1 SNOWDEN 2011 RESOURCE E STIMATE

Snowden employed the “vertical cross-section method” supported by OK as the geostatistical 3D block modelling process to estimate the gold resources within the Magino deposit (Ross 2011).

The Magino deposit resource estimate was supported by 512 surface DDHs (for a total of 103,491 m; average length 202 m) and 980 underground DDHs (for a total of 60,345 m, average length 62 m). However due to concerns of sample bias only 484 of the underground DDHs (for a total length of 48,896 m, average length of 100 m) were used for the estimation process. The geological interpretation was essentially modelled by Prodigy personnel in Gemcom software on 25 m cross-sections, and then exported to Vulcan™ for use by Snowden. Wireframes were provided for the Webb Lake Stock, 17 identified mineralization domains, overburden, internal synvolcanic felsic and intermediate sills and the late stage diabase dyke. All wireframes provided were validated by Snowden. No attempt was made at this time to interpret the Lovell Lake domains or the South meta-volcanic domains. The area of interest covered 1,350 m parallel to the Goudreau deformation zone. The Webb Lake Stock granodiorite trends at 075°, where the alteration zones aggregate up to 300 m wide and dip steeply to depths of 600 m. The overburden of fluvio-glacial material can be up to 30 m thick in parts.

Snowden employed a strategy of 5 m composites, and variography to determine the optimal estimation parameters. A Vulcan™ block model with cell dimensions of 10 m (X) 10 m (Y) and 5 m (Z) was coded to reflect the surface topography, base of overburden, Webb Lake Stock contacts, the late stage diabase dyke, and the 17 domain solids. The model was also depleted for the underground workings too. Rather than applying a top cut to the outliers a shorter-range search was applied to any 5 m composites that graded greater than 22 g/t gold. Snowden applied a global density of 2.72 to all blocks in the model. The spacing of the surface and underground drilling in combination with a possible whittle pit shell was used to determine the resource classification. At a cut-off grade of 0.35 g/t gold, Snowden estimated the Magino resources as follows: Indicated Resources of 67.555 Mt at an average grade of 1.00 g/t gold and contain 2.18 Moz of gold and Inferred Resources of 54.242 Mt at an average grade of 0.99 g/t gold and contain 1.72 Moz of gold.

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 115 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario 14.2 TETRA T ECH 2012 RESOURCE E STIMATE

14.2.1 DATABASE

Prodigy maintains all drillhole data in a DATASHED model database. The collars, survey, lithology, assays, specific gravity (SG), structure and numerous other tables were exported to CSV format and transferred to Tetra Tech. The original MS Excel® file was created on March 26, 2011, with updates provided by Prodigy as more assay results and other data came in, the last updates were received on June 8, 2012. The Project has been drilled by a total of 1,210 surface and underground DDHs for a total of 219,734 m. All 1,210 drillholes are within the area of interest and had enough exploration potential to be included in this resource estimate. All underground holes less than 50 m were excluded from the database and are not included, as Snowden demonstrated significant sample bias with these samples (Ross 2011).

All resource estimations were conducted using Vulcan™ v.8.1.0.

Table 14.1 summarizes the number of drillholes used in the resource estimation for each domain.

Table 14.1 Drill Data Set

Project Webb Lake Lovell Lake South North Total Stock Stock Metavolcanics Metavolcanics No. of Holes 1,210 1,065 31 267 86

14.2.2 SPECIFIC GRAVITY

A total of 5,358 samples were tested for SG from a total of 369 holes provided in the database. SGs were determined by Prodigy for most of the lithology’s found at Magino. Tetra Tech used an SG of 2.72 for the granodiorite stocks and an SG of 2.86 for the mafic metavolcanics, which are the most relevant for the Magino mineralization for the mineral resource estimate. All the SGs used by Tetra Tech are summarized in Table 14.2.

The data in the database SG table suggests that SGs were generally determined by the immersion method.

Tetra Tech recommends that Prodigy continue to collect SG measurements from the various rock types in order to increase the size of their SG dataset. At a minimum 2% of the Prodigy dataset should have an SG measurement. This would mean that Prodigy’s current SG dataset should contain a minimum of 3,352 samples.

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 116 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario Table 14.2 Specific Gravity Data

SG in Mineral Rocktype Resource Domain Total Code Estimate Granodiorite Stocks (WLS/LLS) 3,707 2 2.72 Intermediate Metavolcanics 725 1 2.81 Mafic Metavolcanics 816 0 2.86 Diabase Dyke 103 3 3.01 Overburden 7 - 2.79

14.2.3 EXPLORATORY DATA ANALYSIS

ASSAYS

The four domains which comprise the Webb Lake Stock, Lovell Lake Stock and the South and North Metavolcanics were sampled by a total of 167,630 assays (Table 14.3). Complete assay information was provided for gold. Figure 14.1 is a histogram for all raw Magino data, and Figure 14.2 is a log-probability plot for all raw Magino data.

Table 14.3 Drillhole Assay Statistics (Length-Weighted)

No. of Stand Zone Field Samples Minimum Maximum Mean Deviation Webb Lake Stock Gold 157,530 0 5,365 0.736 15.34 Lovell Lake Stock Gold 1,249 0 45.1 0.585 1.75 South Metavolcanics Gold 7,522 0 166.46 0.572 4.098 North Metavolcanics Gold 1,329 0 59.4 0.538 2.453

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 117 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario Figure 14.1 Histogram of all Raw Magino Data

Figure 14.2 Log-Probability Plot of all Raw Magino Data

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 118 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario GRADE CAPPING

Raw assay data was examined to assess the amount of metal that is at risk from high-grade assays. Histograms and log-probability plots were generated with the raw data per domain and the disintegration method applied to determine what top cut should be applied to each domain.

Tetra Tech chose to apply the appropriate capping values determined as a high- grade threshold value per domain with a shortened range, typically half of the determined variogram’s range, instead of using capped values with the full search ranges. This seemed to be the most appropriate method considering the amount of free gold found on the site visit in 10 to 40 cm wide quartz veins, few of which are likely to be continuous over long distances. Typically, a threshold is applied when a gold system that contains significant high grade free gold in narrow veins mixed with low grade disseminated regions such as Magino and Plutonic Gold Mine in Western Australia, and rather than capping the data, a restricted search is applied to the higher grade values, so that they have some influence on the estimations, but not unnecessarily bias the estimations.

Table 14.4 summarizes the threshold values determined per domain. Please note that this is a table of composited data, and only about 0.1% of samples exceeded the threshold value, thus demonstrating the minor influence of the high grade samples.

Table 14.4 Grade Capping/Threshold Values

No. of Thresh Sample Threshold Grade Capping Capped Zone No. Samples Rang Value (%) Webb Lake Stock 28,292 28 28.01 to 355.97 28 0.10 Lovell Lake Stock 297 6 4.73 to 7.802 4.5 2.02 South Metavolcanics 1,654 20 8.587 to 44.542 7 1.21 North Metavolcanics 328 5 7.407 to 20.8 6 1.52

COMPOSITES

Gold assay data was composited at 5 m down-hole intervals honouring the interpreted geological solids. A 5 m composite length was selected as it corresponds to the chosen block size in the “z” direction and the likely half of bench size during mining activities. Table 14.5 summarizes the statistics of the drillholes after capping and compositing. Figure 14.3 is a histogram for all 5 m composite Magino data, and Figure 14.4 is a log-probability plot for all 5 m composite Magino data. It is worth noting that the standard deviations of the composites compared to the raw statistics are greatly reduced which is not particularly unexpected with 5 m composites compared to the approximately 1 m composites of the raw data.

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 119 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario Table 14.5 Composite Statistics (Length-Weighted)

No. of Stand Zone Field Samples Minimum Maximum Mean Deviation Webb Lake Stock Gold 28,292 0 355.97 0.736 2.962 Lovell Lake Stock Gold 297 0 7.802 0.585 1.18 South Metavolcanics Gold 1654 0 44.542 0.572 1.915 North Metavolcanics Gold 328 0 20.8 0.538 1.827

Figure 14.3 Histogram of all 5 m Composite Magino Data

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 120 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario Figure 14.4 Log-Probability Plot of all 5 m Composite Magino Data

14.2.4 GEOLOGICAL INTERPRETATION

Prodigy personnel interpreted all major lithology and mineralization domains on approximately 25 m sections in Gemcom. Wireframes were provided for the Webb Lake Stock, Lovell Lake Stock, Intermediate Metavolcanics (north and south), 25 identified mineralization domains, over-burden, internal synvolcanic felsic and intermediate sills and the late stage diabase dyke. The Webb Lake domain consists of eight mineralization domains based mostly on grade and perceived structural orientations, where the southwestern domains were nominally separated from the northeastern domains which lie to the northeast of the diabase dyke, based mainly on the variography results. Three mineralization domains were modelled for the Lovell Lake Stock and ten mineralization zones were modelled for the South Metavolcanics. In addition, four mineralization domains were modelled for the North Metavolcanics domain.

Tetra Tech imported these solids into Vulcan™ software and spent much time validating these solids to ensure no wireframes were overlapping. Mineralization zones that were to be used as hard boundaries for estimation were also snapped to drillholes. All solids were subjected to the wireframe validation routines in Vulcan™ software and any problem areas were identified and fixed by Tetra Tech. Table 14.6 tabulates the solids their associated volumes.

The zones of mineralization interpreted for each area were generally contiguous; however, due to the nature of the mineralization there are portions of the wireframes that have grades less than 0.2 g/t, yet are still within the mineralizing trend.

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 121 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario The non-assayed intervals were assigned a value of -9, and these were ignored during the compositing routine so they would not be used during the estimations. Tetra Tech believes that non-assayed material should not be assigned a zero value as this does not reflect the true value of the material.

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 122 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario Table 14.6 Wireframe Statistics

Wireframe Dimensions Minimum Maximum Minimum Maximum Minimum Maximum Volume Zone X X Y Y Z Z (m3) Webb Lake Stock WebbLakeStock.00t 687504 689456 5350138 5351680 -396 405 245,545,470.57 WebbLakeStock_C.00t 687973 689157 5350792 5351309 -212 404 35,125,870.00 WebbLakeStock_SW.00t 687900 689153 5350660 5351218 -371 397 44,523,095.37 WebbLakeStock_NESW.00t 688509 689121 5351077 5351394 -74 405 13,127,028.48 WebbLakeStock_NEW.00t 688855 689073 5351290 5351437 85 393 1,486,025.01 WebbLakeStock_CE.00t 689025 689433 5351185 5351412 -331 394 16,334,929.46 WebbLakeStock_NE.00t 689023 689546 5351364 5351626 -145 394 15,108,929.52 WebbLakeStock_NES.00t 689031 689532 5351271 5351510 -316 393 14,091,845.47 WebbLakeStock_SE.00t 689116 689260 5351124 5351245 -216 196 1,972,859.31 Lovell Lake Stock LovellLakeStock.00t 687226 687696 5350863 5351124 216 397 3,241,860.62 LovellLakeMin.00t 687229 687575 5350885 5351150 204 395 1,382,756.24 LovellLakeMin1.00t 687442 687536 5350977 5351016 260 367 4,644.99 LovellLakeMin2.00t 687352 687545 5350915 5350998 239 339 11,688.58 South Metavolcanics SthMetaVolcs_SWV.00t 688146 688612 5350711 5350965 -118 388 6,722,216.04 SthMetaVolcs_V71.00t 688903 689040 5350999 5351052 -178 315 421,219.71 SthMetaVolcs_V72.00t 688594 688913 5350925 5351025 -87 389 988,659.31 SthMetaVolcs_V73.00t 688599 689113 5350882 5351055 -308 387 4,602,198.54 SthMetaVolcs_VR0.00t 689274 689546 5351275 5351342 14 391 728,403.65 SthMetaVolcs_VR1.00t 689209 689429 5351214 5351288 -119 392 736,381.56 SthMetaVolcs_VR2.00t 689156 689536 5351172 5351283 -13 396 1,536,900.86 table continues…

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 123 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario Wireframe Dimensions Minimum Maximum Minimum Maximum Minimum Maximum Volume Zone X X Y Y Z Z (m3) SthMetaVolcs_VR3.00t 689165 689565 5351120 5351272 -217 398 1,599,077.49 SthMetaVolcs_VR4.00t 689376 689175 5351189 5351224 207 384 117,874.03 SthMetaVolcs_VR5.00t 689033 689175 5351096 5351168 -111 399 477,136.14 North Metavolcanics NthMetaVolcs_NWV.00t 688165 688299 5350938 5351017 176 381 137,871.91 NthMetaVolcs_NV.00t 688555 689036 5351130 5351245 152 387 377,372.80 NthMetaVolcs_NEVW.00t 688808 689036 5351279 5351457 119 387 667,202.11 NthMetaVolcs_NEV.00t 689044 689216 5351436 5351637 -53 390 617,978.73

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 124 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario 14.2.5 SPATIAL ANALYSIS

Using Vulcan™ v.8.1.0 software, variography was completed for gold for all eight domains, where zones were combined if they fell in the same structural domain. Down-hole variograms were used to determine the nugget effect and then correlograms were modelled to determine spatial continuity in the domains. The nugget effects were typically about 80% of the sill (total variance), which is not unexpected in this type of deposit, which contains significant free gold in narrow stock-work veins mixed with lower grade disseminated mineralisation regions. The anisotropies and search ranges for the domains were typical for this type of deposit.

Table 14.7 summarizes results of the variography.

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 125 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario Table 14.7 Variography Parameters

Zone VDESC AZ PL DIP VAXIS1 VAXIS2 VAXIS3 NUGGET ST1 ST1PAR1 ST1PAR2 ST1PAR3 Webb Lake Stock SW Gold 69 10 85 Major Semi Minor 0.785 1 45 40 14 Webb Lake Stock NE Gold 67 -5 85 Major Semi Minor 0.765 1 75 75 19 Lovell Lake Stock D1 Gold 70 25 55 Major Semi Minor 0.820 1 65 33 12 Lovell Lake Stock D2 Gold 68 -20 85 Major Semi Minor 0.820 1 50 40 5 Lovell Lake Stock D3 Gold 92 20 54 Major Semi Minor 0.820 1 45 45 5 South Metavolcanics D1 Gold 72 -10 -90 Major Semi Minor 0.736 1 60 60 5 South Metavolcanics D2 Gold 74 -10 80 Major Semi Minor 0.736 1 50 50 8 North Metavolcanics Gold 57 0 75 Major Semi Minor 0.743 1 75 50 5

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 126 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario 14.2.6 RESOURCE BLOCK MODEL

Individual block models were established in Vulcan™ v.8.1.0 software for all 25 zones using one parent model as the origin. The model was not rotated.

Drillhole spacing is variable with the majority of the drilling spaced at about 35 m. A block size of 10 m x 10 m x 5 m was selected in order to accommodate the moderately spaced drilling, and the nature of the mostly broad zones of mineralization.

Sub-celling of the block model on 1 m x 1 m x 1 m spacing allows the parent block to be split 10, 10 and 5 times respectively in each direction to more accurately fill the volume of the wireframes, and thus more accurately estimate the tonnes in the resource.

Table 14.8 summarizes details of the parent block model.

Table 14.8 Parent Block Model

Origin Cell Size Block Extents X Origin Y Origin Z Origin XINC YINC ZINC NX NY NZ Parent 686800 5350130 -400 10 10 5 2800 2190 810 Sub-blocks 686800 5350130 -400 1 1 1 2800 2190 810

The interpolations for gold for the 25 zones were completed using the estimation methods: NN, ID2, and OK. The estimations were designed for two passes. In each pass a minimum and maximum number of samples were required, in this case 2 and 32 respectively for the first pass and 1 and 32 for the second passes, as well as a maximum number of samples, in this case 3 from a borehole in order to satisfy the estimation criteria. Different search distances were also required to be satisfied based on the variography data. Any blocks estimated in the first pass were assigned an Indicated Resource category and any blocks estimated in the second pass were assigned an Inferred Resource category. Discretizations were set at 4 m x 4 m x 4 m for all estimations and domains.

QKNA or neighbourhood search parameter optimization, was employed to optimize; the minimum and maximum number of samples used per block estimate per domain, as well as the discretization values. Test models were estimated with “slope of regression” and “kriging variance” values closely monitored in order to determine which parameters lead to the most accurate estimation. Table 14.9 and Table 14.10 summarizes the interpolation criteria for the 25 zones.

14.2.7 RESOURCE MODEL DEPLETION

Prodigy supplied Tetra Tech with wire-frames of the historical underground mine workings for Magino. Much time was spent by Tetra Tech validating and separating

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 127 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario the various wire-frames for the underground workings. A script was then executed to code the various blocks as either mined (1) or not mined (0) for these workings. The underground workings contained a total resource at a threshold of 0.35 g/t of about 7.2 Mt at 1.51 g/t for 353 koz. This indicates that the grades in the mined out areas were higher than the average overall model grades. Tetra Tech did include composites from mined out areas in the estimation process.

Also of note is the fact that the pre-2000 drilling accounts for just over 50% of the final sample data and has an average overall grade for all domains of 0.89 g/t, while the post-2000 drilling has an average overall grade for all domains of about 0.54 g/t all at a 0 g/t cut-off. However the author is satisfied that this has not overly biased the estimate to any great extent.

14.2.8 BLOCK MODEL REGULARISATION

A regularized block model for the August 2012 Magino resource was created on August 1, 2012 for the purposes of engineering mine designs for the pre-feasibility study. All blocks were regularized to dimensions of 10 m (X) 10 m (Y) and 5 m (Z). Only the sub-blocks on the edges of mineralization envelopes were affected by the re-blocking algorithms. The new regularized blocks parameters were calculated as follows:

• Rock type was calculated on a majority basis – meaning that which- ever rock type was applied in the sub-blocks as a majority was applied to the re- blocked block in the same area. • Zone code was also calculated on a majority basis. • Grade (au_ok) was calculated on a volume and density weighted basis – which means that any blocks on the edges of the mineralization domains would have a diluted grade calculated on the weighting by volume and density of the original sub-blocks used to calculate the grade of the new re- blocked block. It should be noted that a 0 g/t grade was applied to any un- estimated blocks in the original sub-blocked model, so no default values of - 99.0g/t could bias any re-block grade calculations. Hence only re-blocks on the edges of the mineralization wire-frames could have been diluted out of contention for later mining concerns. Figure 14.5 illustrates the Vulcan™ method of re-blocking and is taken from the Vulcan Help documentation. • Res-cat code was calculated on a majority basis. • Density was calculated on a volume weighted basis, similarly to grade. • Ox-state (oxidation state) was calculated on a majority basis. • Mined was calculated on a majority basis.

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 128 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario Figure 14.5 Regularization S4 S3

C4 C3 R C1 C2

S1 S2 Note: The regularization methods calculate variables using sub-blocks, regular blocks and common blocks. Common blocks are generated when a regular block intersects sub- blocks. In Figure 14.5, R indicates the regular block, S the sub-blocks and C the common blocks. The number of sub-blocks intersected by a regular block is denoted by NSB (Number of sub-blocks).

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 129 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario Table 14.9 Estimation Criteria

table continues…

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 130 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario Prodigy Gold Incorporated 131 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario Table 14.10 Search Criteria

Zone SREFNUM SMETHOD SDIST_MAJ SDIST2_SMAJ SDIST_MINOR SAZIMUTH SPLUNGE SDIP MINSAMP MAXSAMP MAXHOLES Webb Lake l11-14ind OK 90 80 14 69 10 85 2 32 3 Stock SW l11-14ind ID 90 80 14 69 10 85 2 32 3 l11-14ind NN 90 80 14 69 10 85 1 1 3 Webb Lake l15-18ind OK 75 75 19 67 -5 85 2 32 3 Stock NE l15-18ind ID 75 75 19 67 -5 85 2 32 3 l15-18ind NN 75 75 19 67 -5 85 1 1 3 Lovell Lake l19ind OK 65 33 12 70 25 53 2 32 3 Stock D1 l19ind ID 65 33 12 70 25 53 2 32 3 l19ind NN 65 33 12 70 25 53 1 1 3 Lovell Lake l20ind OK 50 40 5 68 -20 85 2 32 3 Stock D2 l20ind ID 50 40 5 68 -20 85 2 32 3 l20ind NN 50 40 5 68 -20 85 1 1 3 Lovell Lake l21ind OK 45 45 5 92 20 54 2 32 3 Stock D3 l21ind ID 45 45 5 92 20 54 2 32 3 l21ind NN 45 45 5 92 20 54 1 1 3 South l23-31ind OK 60 60 5 72 -10 -90 2 32 3 Metavolcanics l23-31ind ID 60 60 5 72 -10 -90 2 32 3 D1 l23-31ind NN 60 60 5 72 -10 -90 1 1 3 South l22ind OK 50 50 8 74 -10 80 2 32 3 Metavolcanics l22ind ID 50 50 8 74 -10 80 2 32 3 D2 l22ind NN 50 50 8 74 -10 80 1 1 3 North l32-35ind OK 75 50 5 57 0 75 2 32 3 Metavolcanics l32-35ind ID 75 50 5 57 0 75 2 32 3 l32-35ind NN 75 50 5 57 0 75 1 1 3 table continues…

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 132 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario Zone SREFNUM SMETHOD SDIST_MAJ SDIST2_SMAJ SDIST_MINOR SAZIMUTH SPLUNGE SDIP MINSAMP MAXSAMP MAXHOLES Webb Lake l11-14inf OK 180 160 14 69 10 85 1 32 3 Stock SW l11-14inf ID 180 160 14 69 10 85 1 32 3 l11-14inf NN 180 160 14 69 10 85 1 1 3 Webb Lake l15-18inf OK 150 150 19 67 -5 85 1 32 3 Stock NE l15-18inf ID 150 150 19 67 -5 85 1 32 3 l15-18inf NN 150 150 19 67 -5 85 1 1 3 Lovell Lake l19inf OK 130 66 12 70 25 53 1 32 3 Stock D1 l19inf ID 130 66 12 70 25 53 1 32 3 l19inf NN 130 66 12 70 25 53 1 1 3 Lovell Lake l20inf OK 100 80 5 68 -20 85 1 32 3 Stock D2 l20inf ID 100 80 5 68 -20 85 1 32 3 l20inf NN 100 80 5 68 -20 85 1 1 3 Lovell Lake l21inf OK 90 90 5 92 20 54 1 32 3 Stock D3 l21inf ID 90 90 5 92 20 54 1 32 3 l21inf NN 90 90 5 92 20 54 1 1 3 South l23-31inf OK 120 120 5 72 -10 -90 1 32 3 Metavolcanics l23-31inf ID 120 120 5 72 -10 -90 1 32 3 D1 l23-31inf NN 120 120 5 72 -10 -90 1 1 3 South l22inf OK 100 100 8 74 -10 80 1 32 3 Metavolcanics l22inf ID 100 100 8 74 -10 80 1 32 3 D2 l22inf NN 100 100 8 74 -10 80 1 1 3 North l32-35inf OK 150 100 7 57 0 75 1 32 3 Metavolcanics l32-35inf ID 150 100 7 57 0 75 1 32 3 l32-35inf NN 150 100 7 57 0 75 1 1 3

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 133 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario 14.2.9 RESOURCE CLASSIFICATION

Several factors are considered in the definition of a resource classification:

• NI 43-101 requirements • CIM guidelines • authors experience with Archean lode gold deposits • spatial continuity based on variography of the assays within the drillholes.

No environmental, permitting, legal, title, taxation, socioeconomic, marketing or other relevant issues are known to Tetra Tech that may affect the estimate of mineral resources. Mineral reserves can only be estimated on the basis of an economic evaluation that is used in a PFS or a feasibility study of a mineral project.

14.2.10 MINERAL RESOURCE TABULATION

The resource reported as of September 2012 has been tabulated in terms of a gold cut-off grade. The Mineral Resources for the four domains at the Magino deposit are tabulated in Table 14.11 to Note: Previously mined material not included. Base case figures are in bold and shaded grey.

Table 14.15 for the Indicated and Inferred Resources respectively. The resources are tabulated using various cut-off grades for gold up to an upper bound of greater than 1.3 g/t gold.

Table 14.11 Webb Lake Stock Domain Tonnes and Grade

Total Class OK Cut-off Tonnes Au (g/t) Au (oz) Indicated 0.2 277,696,690 0.72 6,428,270 0.3 231,298,240 0.81 6,023,490 0.35 207,268,820 0.87 5,797,550 0.4 185,518,430 0.92 5,487,390 0.5 148,310,710 1.04 4,959,030 0.6 118,956,860 1.16 4,436,480 0.7 95,491,200 1.29 3,960,450 1.0 51,157,010 1.69 2,779,600 1.3 29,186,290 2.11 1,979,940 Inferred 0.2 12,032,320 0.60 232,110 0.3 8,998,570 0.71 205,410 0.35 7,803,620 0.77 193,190 0.4 6,765,080 0.84 182,700 0.5 5,188,180 0.95 158,460 0.6 4,103,980 1.06 139,860 0.7 3,163,310 1.18 120,010 1.0 1,574,300 1.55 78,450 1.3 910,290 1.85 54,140 Note: Previously mined material not included. Base case figures are in bold and shaded grey.

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 134 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario Table 14.12 Lovell Lake Stock Domain Tonnes and Grade

Total Class OK Cut-off Tonnes Au (g/t) Au (oz) Indicated 0.2 2,744,900 0.64 56,480 0.3 2,193,970 0.73 51,490 0.35 1,880,830 0.80 48,380 0.4 1,617,680 0.87 45,250 0.5 1,216,920 1.01 39,520 0.6 910,660 1.17 34,260 0.7 725,300 1.30 30,310 1.0 458,810 1.58 23,310 1.3 312,430 1.78 17,880 Inferred 0.2 255,720 0.39 3,210 0.3 163,180 0.47 2,470 0.35 123,370 0.52 2,060 0.4 91,970 0.57 1,680 0.5 56,540 0.64 1,160 0.6 15,560 0.93 460 0.7 8,100 1.20 310 1.0 5,130 1.45 240 1.3 1,870 1.79 110 Note: Previously mined material not included. Base case figures are in bold and shaded grey.

Table 14.13 South Metavolcanics Domain Tonnes and Grade

Total Class OK Cut-off Tonnes Au (g/t) Au (oz) Indicated 0.2 19,090,560 0.65 398,950 0.3 14,430,600 0.78 361,880 0.35 12,514,080 0.85 341,990 0.4 11,171,130 0.91 326,840 0.5 8,877,510 1.03 293,980 0.6 7,127,520 1.14 261,240 0.7 5,754,690 1.26 233,120 1.0 3,025,290 1.65 160,490 1.3 1,701,970 2.05 112,170 Inferred 0.2 8,440,690 0.66 179,110 0.3 6,514,180 0.78 163,360 0.35 5,757,820 0.85 157,350 0.4 4,954,610 0.92 146,550 0.5 3,715,480 1.08 129,010 0.6 2,852,790 1.24 113,730 0.7 2,238,110 1.40 100,740 1.0 1,209,730 1.91 74,290 1.3 774,010 2.32 57,730 Note: Previously mined material not included. Base case figures are in bold and shaded grey.

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 135 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario Table 14.14 North Meta Volcanics Domain Tonnes and Grade

Total Class OK Cut-off Tonnes Au (g/t) Au (oz) Indicated 0.2 2,659,210 0.71 60,700 0.3 1,983,340 0.87 55,480 0.35 1,816,060 0.92 53,720 0.4 1,590,060 1.00 51,120 0.5 1,275,950 1.14 46,770 0.6 1,139,540 1.21 44,330 0.7 998,950 1.29 41,430 1.0 665,020 1.51 32,280 1.3 325,560 1.88 19,670 Inferred 0.2 358,760 0.36 4,150 0.3 141,100 0.54 2,450 0.35 124,600 0.56 2,240 0.4 108,090 0.59 2,050 0.5 61,050 0.70 1,370 0.6 33,770 0.82 890 0.7 20,120 0.93 600 1.0 5,610 1.17 210 1.3 1,860 1.34 80 Note: Previously mined material not included. Base case figures are in bold and shaded grey.

Table 14.15 Magino Deposit Tonnes and Grade

Total Class OK Cut-off Tonnes Au (g/t) Au (oz) Indicated 0.2 302,191,360 0.71 6,898,130 0.3 249,906,150 0.81 6,508,080 0.35 223,479,790 0.87 6,250,990 0.4 199,897,300 0.92 5,912,700 0.5 159,681,100 1.04 5,339,220 0.6 128,134,590 1.16 4,778,760 0.7 102,970,140 1.29 4,270,630 1.0 55,306,140 1.69 3,005,050 1.3 31,526,260 2.10 2,128,540 Inferred 0.2 21,087,510 0.62 420,350 0.3 15,817,030 0.74 376,310 0.35 13,809,410 0.80 355,190 0.4 11,919,740 0.87 333,410 0.5 9,021,260 1.00 290,040 0.6 7,006,100 1.13 254,530 0.7 5,429,660 1.27 221,700 1.0 2,794,780 1.71 153,650 1.3 1,688,040 2.06 111,800 Note: Previously mined material not included. Base case figures are in bold and shaded grey.

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 136 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario Based on the results of estimation of similar greenstone gold projects located in the provinces of Ontario and Quebec, a 0.35 g/t gold cut-off was used to tabulate the total within the various categories.

Tetra Tech and Prodigy have determined that it is most appropriate to report the mineral resource unconstrained by a pit-shell, to fully reflect the deep potential typical of shear-zone-hosted gold deposits. As a result, the mineral resource reported below is greater than the mineral resource disclosed in Prodigy's press release dated August 20, 2012. The cut-off applied is based on the following parameters:

• operating cost of $1.80/t at 50,000 t/d • gold price of US$1,388/tr oz • US$ to Cdn$ conversion of 1.003 • gold recovery of 94.5%.

Table 14.16 summarizes the resource estimate at the 0.35 g/t gold cut-off.

Table 14.16 Magino Resource Estimate, September 2012

Au Au Class Domain Tonnes (g/t) (oz) Indicated Webb Lake Stock 207,268,820 0.87 5,797,550 Lovell Lake Stock 1,880,830 0.80 48,380 South Metavolcanics 12,514,080 0.85 341,990 North Metavolcanics 1,816,060 0.92 53,720 Total 223,479,790 0.87 6,250,990 Inferred Webb Lake Stock 7,803,620 0.77 193,190 Lovell Lake Stock 123,370 0.52 2,060 South Metavolcanics 5,757,820 0.85 157,350 North Metavolcanics 124,600 0.56 2,240 Total 13,809,410 0.80 355,190 Note: OK method at 0.35 g/t cut-off does not include previously mined material.

14.2.11 VALIDATION

The Magino deposit gold grade models were validated by three methods:

• Visual comparison of colour-coded block model grades with borehole grades on section and plan. • Comparisons of the global mean block grades for the OK, ID2, NN, and composites. • Swath plots comparing OK grades with ID2 and NN estimates.

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 137 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario VISUAL COMPARISON

The visual comparisons of block model grades with composite/borehole grades for each of the 60 zones show a reasonable correlation between the values. No significant discrepancies were apparent from the sections and plans reviewed, yet grade smoothing is apparent (Figure 14.6 and Figure 14.7).

Figure 14.6 Cross Section

Note: Oblique section looking northeast at approximately 5,351,250N.

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 138 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario Figure 14.7 Plan View of Magino

Note: At 330 mRL.

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 139 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario GLOBAL COMPARSION

The global block model statistics for the OK model were compared to the global ID2 and NN model values as well as the composite drillhole data. Table 14.17 shows this comparison of the global estimates for the three estimation method calculations. In general, there is agreement between the OK models, the ID2 model and the NN model. Larger discrepancies are reflected as a result of lower drill density in some portions of the model. There is a degree of smoothing apparent when compared to the diamond drilling statistics. Block estimate comparisons were made using all blocks at a 0 g/t cut-off.

Table 14.17 Global Mean Statistics

DDH OK OK ID ID NN NN Domain Composite Tonnes Grade Tonnes Grade Tonnes Grade Webb Lake Stock 0.736 378,945,067 0.613 378,945,067 0.612 378,945,067 0.611 Lovell Lake Stock 0.585 3,820,209 0.506 3,820,209 0.511 3,820,209 0.527 South Metavolcanics 0.572 48,662,881 0.415 48,662,881 0.421 48,662,881 0.432 North Metavolcanics 0.538 5,104,421 0.441 5,104,421 0.461 5,104,421 0.486

SWATH PLOTS COMPARISON

Swath plots were generated for gold for northings, eastings and elevations respectively, at 10 m intervals for eastings, 10 m intervals for northings and 5 m intervals for elevations. These plots are comparing ID2 with OK estimations, and NN with OK estimations, as illustrated in Figure 14.8 and Figure 14.9. The swath plots show that in general the OK, ID2 and NN estimations compare quite favourably.

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 140 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario Figure 14.8 Swath Plots for Gold OK versus ID2 Estimates

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 141 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario Figure 14.9 Swath Plots for Gold OK versus NN Estimates

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 142 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario 14.2.12 MODEL PARAMETER DIFFERENCES

There are several parameters that differentiate the 2012 Tetra Tech model from the 2011 Snowden block model. The primary differences are tabulated in Table 14.18.

Table 14.18 Model Parameter Differences

2012 Tetra Tech Model 2011 Snowden Model Number of Drillholes 1,210 996 Grade Capping No – threshold applied (28 g/t etal) No – threshold applied (22 g/t) Composite Length 5.0 m 5.0 m Gold Pricing US$1,388/oz Cdn$1,500/oz Number of Mineralized Zones 25 domains 17 domains Specific Gravity Variable per domain(2.72-2.86) 2.72 Globally Estimation Method OK with NN and ID2 validation OK

There has been a substantial amount of new drilling completed since the Snowden model was created with the intention of increasing the size of the mineral resource. In addition, the different modelling parameters, would lead to a change in the resource tonnes being stated.

When similar cut-off grade parameters used in the 2011 Snowden model are applied against the 2012 Tetra Tech OK model, comparable grades are registered (Table 14.19).

Table 14.19 Comparable Grades

2012 Tetra Tech 2011 Snowden Difference Change OK Model OK Model (%) (%) Tonnes Grade Tonnes Grade Tonnes Grade Tonnes Grade Indicated at 223,479,790 0.87 67,555,000 1.00 155,924,790 -0.13 231 -13 0.35 g/t cut-off Inferred at 13,809,410 0.80 54,242,000 0.99 -40,432,590 -0.19 -75 -19 0.35 g/t cut-off

This would indicate that: 1) the Snowden model was valid at the time it was created, and 2) the additional drillholes placed into the deposit, while expanding the resource, the grades intersected remain consistent with grades reported in earlier drill programs. Although the grades are variable within drillholes, the grades have a lower variability within the entire zone. This would lead to the understanding that there is little potential to identify a higher-grade (greater than 2 g/t) core within the deposit. However there is the strong potential to define a greater than 1.2 g/t domain which could be employed for a starter pit scenario in the future.

Going forward, all future resource estimates on the Magino deposit should be completed by the OK methodology with ID2 and NN methods only being used to compare global results for validation purposes.

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 143 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario 15.0 ADJACENT PROPERTIES

There are no material properties adjacent to the Property that is the subject of the current technical report.

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 144 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario 16.0 OTHER RELEVANT DATA AND INFORMATION

In 2011, Prodigy Gold retained Tetra Tech (the main contractor), Snowden, Golder Associates and EBA to complete a NI 43-101 PEA and technical report on the Project, with a minimum 7.3 Mt/a open pit mine. Prodigy intends to disclose a PFS in 2013. The PFS will incorporate the mineral resource disclosed in the current report, together with a new mine plan and capital cost and operating cost estimates.

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 145 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario 17.0 INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS

Based on the review of the available information and observations made during the site visit, Tetra Tech concludes the following, in no particular order of perceived importance:

• The Magino deposit is currently held 100% by Prodigy. • The mineralization model used for the Property is analogous to orogenic gold occurrences related to longitudinal shear zones (greenstone-hosted quartz-carbonate vein deposit). Greenstone-hosted quartz-carbonate vein deposits are a subtype of lode-gold deposits (Poulsen et al. 2000). They correspond to structurally controlled, complex epigenetic deposits hosted in deformed metamorphosed terrains (Dubé and Gosselin 2007). • Gold mineralization at the Magino Mine occurs primarily within the Webb Lake and Lovell Lake granodiorite (trondhjemite) stocks. The Webb Lake and Lovell Lake stocks underwent variable metasomatic alteration during deformation and gold mineralization (Heather and Arias 1992). Distinct haloes of quartz-sericite-pyrite with minor iron-carbonate and hematite alteration are observed adjacent to the quartz vein systems. Alteration of the Webb Lake stock outside the gold-bearing zones is manifested by a chlorite-albite- quartz-tourmaline-calcite assemblage (Heather and Arias 1992). Locally present within the stock are lenticular chlorite-schist zones that represent either strongly foliated mafic metavolcanic xenoliths or a chlorite-altered felsic intrusion (Heather and Arias 1992). In addition narrow zones of mineralization have also been identified in the northern and southern metavolcanics, adjacent to the Webb Lake Stock. • Mineralization is currently defined in four domains containing 25 individual zones of mineralization based on grade and structural orientations. • Drilling and sampling procedures, sample preparation and assay protocols are generally conducted in agreement with best practices. • Verification of the drillhole collars, surveys, assays, core and drillhole logs indicates that the Prodigy data is reliable. • Based on the QA/QC program, the data is sufficiently reliable to support the resource estimate generated for the four domains of the Magino deposit. • The mineral models have been constructed in conformance to industry standard practices. • The geological understanding is sufficient to support the resource estimation.

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 146 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario • At a gold cut-off grade of 0.35 g/t gold, the four domains contain an Indicated Resource of approximately 223 Mt with an average grade of 0.87 g/t gold for about 6.2 Moz gold. The Inferred Resource totals approximately 13.8 Mt with an average grade of 0.8 g/t gold for about 355 koz gold. • The SG values used to determine the tonnages were derived from a reasonably substantial dataset of samples, and Tetra Tech is comfortable with the precision of the resource tonnages. • The Magino deposit remains open in both strike and dip. • The Michipicoten greenstone belt contains other zones with similar geology, alteration and mineralization to the Magino deposit.

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 147 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario 18.0 RECOMMENDATIONS

18.1 DRILLING

Tetra Tech believes that additional drilling should be carried out to investigate:

• the down-dip extension of the current resource for the Magino mineralization • the known resource in order to improve the understanding of the geometry and potentially upgrade the resource category of the Webb Lake Stock.

18.1.1 MAGINO RESOURCE EXPANSION

This is designed to test down-dip extension of known mineralization.

The drilling campaign should be designed to target the potential down-dip extensions of the Webb Lake Stock to a depth of about 700 m vertical. Upon completion of the drilling campaign, all drill collars should be surveyed and the drill database updated. Table 18.1 summarizes the anticipated costs.

Table 18.1 Resource Expansion Drilling

Rate Cost Project Activity ($) Units ($) Magino DDH Drilling (10 holes) 150/m 7,000 1,050,000 Magino Survey Collars 350/day 1 350 Indirect Costs Salaries 8,000/month 4 32,000 Fuel 1,500/month 4 6,000 Admin- Camp 2,500/month 4 10,000 Consumables - - 52,500 Total - - - 1,150,850

18.1.2 MAGINO RESOURCE DELINEATION

This is designed improve understanding of the existing mineral resource and upgrade the resource category.

Drilling will target Webb Lake Stock on an approximately 25 m spaced east-west grid and an approximately 30 to 40 m down-dip grid to a depth of about 700 m. This will reduce the current drill spacing from about 40 m x 40 m to about 25 m x 25 m in most instances.

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 148 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario Upon completion of the drilling campaign, all drill collars should be surveyed and the drill database updated. Table 18.2 summarizes the anticipated costs.

Table 18.2 Magino Resource Delineation Drilling

Rate Cost Project Activity ($) Units ($) Magino DDH Drilling (20 holes) 150/m 13,000 1,950,000 Magino Survey Collars 350/day 3 1,050 Indirect Costs Salaries 8,000/month 5 40,000 Fuel 1,500/month 5 7,500 Admin - Camp 2,500/month 5 12,500 Consumables - - 97,500 Total - - - 2,108,550

18.2 PREFEASIBILITY S TUDY

Tetra Tech recommends conducting a prefeasibility study to evaluate the potential economic viability of the Property, based on the February 2012 PEA and this new resource estimate. It should incorporate the following items:

• new mine plan, re-evaluating open-pit and underground methods, different throughput, set-backs, production schedules

• consider potential carbon-in-pulp and heap leach options

• detailed estimation of current capital costs and operating costs

• proceed with economic analysis, based on the above

The proposed budget for the prefeasibility study is approximately $2.5 million.

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 149 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario 19.0 REFERENCES

Arias, Z. G., and Heather, K. B., 1987. Regional structural geology related to gold mineralization in Goudreau-Lochalsh area, District of Algoma; in Summary of Field Work and Other Activities 1987, Ontario Geological Survey, Miscellaneous Paper 137, pages 146-154.

Arias, Z., and Helmstaedt, H., 1990. Structural evolution of the Michipicoten (Wawa) greenstone belt, Superior Province; in Geoscience research Program, Summary of Research 1989-1990; Ontario Geological Survey, Miscellaneous Paper 150, pages 107 114.

Attoh, K., 1981. Pre- and Post-Doré sequences in the Wawa volcanic belt, Ontario; in Current Research, Part B; Geological Survey of Canada, Paper 81-1B, pages 49- 54.

Ayres, L. D., 1969. Geology of Townships 31 and 30, Ranges 20 and 19; Ontario department Mines, G.R-69, 100 pages.

Ayres, L. D., 1983. Bimodal volcanism in Archean greenstone belts exemplified greywacke composition, Lake Superior Park, Ontario; Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, v. 20, p. 1168-1194.

BLM Bharti Engineering Limited, 1996. Magino Mine Study (“Revised”), Internal Report. Golden Goose Resources Inc.

BLM Bharti Engineering Limited, 1997. Preliminary Feasibility Study for a 2.6M tpa Open Pit Mine and Leach Plant, Magino Gold Project, Dubreuilville, Ontario, Internal Report, Golden Goose Resources Inc.

Bloom, L., 2009. Memo from ASL to Golden Goose Resources “Preliminary comments on the Magino project re-assay program”. Internal Report, Golden Goose Resources Inc. 9 pages.

Bourne, D. A., 1984. An evaluation of the Magino Gold Mine, Goudreau-Lochalsh area, Ontario. Report presented to Prophet Resources Ltd and June Resources Inc. Donald A. Bourne, B.Sc., M. Sc., P. Eng. Consulting Geologist. Internal Report. 28 pages. Prodigy Gold Incorporated 27-2 1195890100-REP-R0001-02 Magino Property Preliminary Economic Assessment and Technical Report, Ontario, Canada

Bourne, D. A., Botsford, J. N., and Ross, M., 1987. Report on the Magino Gold Project. Commissioned by Muscocho Explorations Ltd. Report presented to

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 150 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario Muscocho Explorations Ltd and McNellen Resources Inc. Internal Report. 172 pages.

Bourne, D.A., Mongeau, J. R., Seeber, O. A., Wade, J., and Wilson, B. H., 1983. The Magino Mine Technical and Economic Study. 96 pages. (Assessment File Research Imaging AFRI file No. 42C08SW0235 on Ministry of Northern Development and Mines website)

Buchan, K. L., and Ernst, R. E., 2004. Diabase dyke swarms and related units in Canada and adjacent regions (with accompanying notes): Geological Survey of Canada, Map 2022A, 1:5,000,000.

Burns, N. R., and Reddick, J., 2004. Technical Report Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario, Canada. Report presented to Golden Goose Resources Inc. Report prepared by Snowden Mining Industry Consultants. Report published on SEDAR website dated 6 April, 2004, 43 pages.

Card, K. D. and Ciesielski, A. 1986. DNAG #1. Subdivisions of the Superior province of the Canadian Shield. Geoscience Canada 13. p. 5-13.

Card, K. D., and Poulsen, K. H., 1998. Geology and mineral deposits of the Superior Province of the Canadian Shield; Chapter 2 in Geology of the Precambrian Superior and Grenville Provinces and Precambrian Fossils in North America, (coord.)

S. Lucas; Geological Survey of Canada, Geology of Canada, no. 7, pages 12-194.

Corfu, F., and Sage, R. P., 1992. U-Pb constraints for deposition of clastic meta- sedimentary rocks and late-tectonic plutonism, Michipicoten belt, Superior Province; Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, v. 29, pages 1640-1651.

Corfu, F., and Stott, G. M., 1986. U-Pb ages for late magmatism and regional deformation in the Shebandowan belt, Superior Province, Canada. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, v. 35, pages 1075-1082.

Davis, D. W., and Lin, S., 2003. Unravelling the geologic history of the Hemlo Archean gold deposit, Superior Province, Canada: A U-Pb geochronological study. Economic Geology, v. 98, pages 51-67.

Deevy, A. J., 1992. Magino, The making of a mine. Muscocho Explorations Ltd. Internal Report. 28 pages.

Deevy, A. J., 1994. Magino, The making of a Mine. Exploration and Mining Geology, vol. 3, No. 1 pages 45-51.

Dubé, B. and Gosselin, P., 2007. Greenstone-Hosted Quartz-Carbonate Vein Deposits. In Goodfellow, W. D., ed. Mineral Deposits of Canada: A Synthesis of Prodigy Gold Incorporated 27-3 1195890100-REP-R0001-02 Magino Property

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 151 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario Preliminary Economic Assessment and Technical Report, Ontario, Canada Major Deposit Types, District Metallogeny, the Evolution of Geological Provinces, and Exploration Methods. Geological Association of Canada, Mineral Deposits Division, Special Publication No. 5. p. 49-73.

Dubé, B., O’Brien, S., and Dunning, G. R., 2001. Gold deposits in deformed terranes: examples of epithermal and quartz-carbonate shear-zone-related gold systems in the Newfoundland Appalachians and their implications for exploration. In North Atlantic Symposium, St-John’s, NF, Canada. Extended abstracts volume, 27-30 May, 2001. p. 31-35.

Dyck, D. and Bleiker, D. 2003. Closure Plan – Amendment No. 1 – Golden Goose Resources Inc., Magino Mine Site. Prepared by AMEC Earth & Environmental Limited (TC630.01). February 2003. 22 pages, appendices and plan.

Dzick, W., 2011. Report on Magino Drillhole Analysis. Comparison of drill sampling campaigns – Magino Gold Project, Ontario, Canada. Snowden Mining Consultants. Internal Report. 20 pages.

Goodwin, A. M., 1962. Structure, stratigraphy and iron formation, Michipicoten area, Algoma District, Ontario, Canada; Geological Society of America Bulletin, v. 73, pages 561-586.

Goodwin, A. M., Ambrose, J. W., Ayers, L. D., Clifford, P. M., Currie, K. L.,Ermanovics, I. M., Fahrig, W. F., Gibb, R. A., Hall, D. H., Innes, M. J. S., Irvine, T. N., MacLaren, A. S., Norris, A. W., Pettijohn, F. J., and Ridler, P. H., 1972. The Superior Province. In: Variations in Tectonic Style in Canada, (eds.) R. A. Price and R. W. Douglas; Geological Association of Canada, Special Paper 11, pages 528-623.

Hall, D., Williston, C., and Legault, J. M., 1997. Regarding the Induced Polarization Surveys over the Magino Mine Project, Finan Township, Ontario on behalf of Golden Goose Resources Inc. Report prepared by Quantec Consulting Inc. Internal Report. 25 pages.

Heather, K. B., 1989. The geological and structural setting of gold mineralization in the Renabie portion of the Missanabie-Renabie gold district, Wawa gold camp; in Summary of Field Work and Other Activities 1989, Ontario Geological Survey, Miscellaneous Paper 146, pages 99-107.

Heather, K. B., and Arias, Z. G., 1987. Geological setting of gold mineralization in Goudreau-Lochalsh area, District of Algoma; in Summary of Field Work and Other Activities 1987, Ontario Geological Survey, Miscellaneous Paper 137, pages 155-162.

Heather, K. B., and Arias, Z., 1992. Geological and structural setting of gold mineralization in the Goudreau-Lochalsh area, Wawa gold camp. Ontario Geological Survey, Open File Report 5832. 159 pages.

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 152 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario Hoffman, P. F. 1988. United plates of America, the birth of a craton: Early Proterozoic assembly and growth of Laurentia; Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Science, v. 16, pages 543-603.

Hoffman, P. F., 1989. Precambrian geology and tectonic history of North America; in The Geology of North America – An overview, (ed.) A. W. Bally and A. R. Palmer; Geological Society of America, The Geology of North America, Volume A, pages 447 512.

Jackson, S. L., and Sutcliffe, R. H., 1990. Central Superior Province geology; evidence for an allochthonous, ensimatic, southern Abitibi greenstone belt; Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, v. 27, pages 582-589.

Kappes, Cassidy & Associates, 1999. Report of Metallurgical Testwork, Magino Property. Internal Report.

Koskitalo, L. O., 1983. Magino Gold Project, Wawa Area, Ontario. Report presented to McNellen Resources Inc. James Wade Engineering Ltd. Toronto. Project No. WE83-068. Internal Report. 67 pages.

Leclerc, A., and Fleury, F., 2009. Propriété Magino, Levé Pédogéochimique d’humus, Grilles Magino SE et NO. Gestion Aline Leclerc Inc. Internal Report. 32 pages.

McBride, D. E., 1991. Report of the geology, reserves and potential of the Magino Deposit, Finan township, Ontario. Internal Report. 19 pages.

McBride, T.I. and Duckworth, P., 2010. Hydrogeological Study, Magino Mine Project, Finan Township, District of Wawa, Ontario. Golden Goose Resources Inc. Prepared by AMEC Earth & Environmental – Project TC63001 2000. March 17, 2010. 53 pages.

McGill, G. E., 1992. Structure and kinematics of a major tectonic contact belt, Ontario; Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, v. 29, pages 2118-2132.

McGill, G. E., and Shrady, C. H., 1986. Evidence for a complex Archean deformational history, southwestern Michipicoten greenstone belt, Ontario; Journal of Geophysical Reports, v. 91, pages E281-E289.

Mongeau, R., 1982. Geophysical Survey of the A, B, C claim group, Finan Twp., Ontario. Magino Joint Venture. Internal Report. 7 pages.

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 27-5 1195890100-REP-R0001-02 Magino Property Preliminary Economic Assessment and Technical Report, Ontario, Canada

Muscocho Explorations Ltd., 1987. 1986 year-end report, Magino Joint Venture Gold Project. March 1987. Muscocho Explorations Ltd. and McNellen Resources. Internal Report. 22 pages.

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 153 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario Muir, T. L., 2003. Structural evolution of the Hemlo greenstone belt in the vicinity of the world-class Hemlo gold deposit. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, v. 40, pages 395-430.

Nielsen, F. W., 1995. Summary and Review of Past Work and Options for Future Work, Magino Mine, Wawa Area, Ontario. Report presented to Muscocho Explorations Ltd. Prepared by R. Bruce Graham and Associates Ltd. Internal Report. 38 pages.

Nielsen, F. W., 1997. Diamond Drilling Program, Magino Mine, Wawa Area, Ontario, September 1997. Report presented to Golden Goose Resources Inc. Prepared by Pearson, Hofman and Associates Ltd. Internal Report. 19 pages.

Parbery, D., and Mongeau, J. 1982. Geological Survey of the A, B, C Claim Group, Finan TWP, Ontario. Magino Joint Venture. Internal Report. 6 pages.

Percival, J. A., 2007. Geology and Metallogeny of the Superior Province, Canada. In Goodfellow W. D., ed., Mineral Deposits of Canada: A Synthesis of Major Deposit Types, District Metallogeny, the Evolution of Geological Provinces, and Exploration Methods: Geological Association of Canada, Mineral Deposits Division, Special Publication No.5, p. 903-928.

Pearson, Hofman and Associates Ltd., 1997. Evaluation of In-Situ Resources (“Revised”), Magino Mine Project, Wawa Area, Ontario, Internal Report, Golden Goose Resources Inc.

Perkins, M. J., 1997. Report on Magino Gold Mine Property Check Sampling Program. Report presented to Golden Goose Resources Inc. Report prepared by Pearson, Hofman and Associates Ltd. Internal Report 16 pages.

Perkins, M. J., 1999. Structural Geology and Gold Magino Mine Project, Wawa Area, Ontario. Report prepared for Golden Goose Resources Inc. Internal Report 9 pages.

Perkins, M. J., 1999a. Report of Metallurgical Testwork Magino Mine Project, Wawa Area, Ontario. Report prepared for Golden Goose Resources Inc. Internal Report 12 pages.

Peterson, V. L., and Zaleski, E., 1999. Structural history of the Manitouwadge greenstone belt and its volcanogenic Cu-Zn massive sulphide deposits, Wawa Subprovince, south-central Superior Province. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, v. 36, pages 605-625.

Polat, A, and Kerrich, R., 1999. Formation of an Archean tectonic mélange in the Schreiber-Hemlo greenstone belt, Superior Province, Canada: Implications for Archean subductionaccretion processes. Tectonics, v. 18, p. 733-755.

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 154 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario Polat, A., and Kerrich, R., 2001. Magnesian andesites, Nb-enriched basaltsandesites, and adakites from late Archean 2.7 Ga Wawa greenstone belts, Superior Province, Canada: Implication for late Archean subduction zone petrogenetic processes. Contribution to Mineralogy and Petrology, v. 141, pages 36-52.

Polat, A., Kerrich, R., and Wyman, D., 1998. The late Archean Schreiber-Hemlo and White River-Dayohessarah greenstone belts, Superior Province: Collage of oceanic plateaus, oceanic arcs, and subduction-accretion complexes Tectonophysics, v. 289, pages 295-326.

Poulsen, K. H., 1996. Lode Gold : in Geology of Canadian Mineral Deposits Types, (ed.) O. R. Eckstrand, W. D. Sinclair, and R. I. Thorpe; Geological Survey of Canada, Geology of Canada, no 8, p. 323-328.

Poulsen, K. H., Robert, F., and Dubé, B., 2000. Geological classification of Canadian gold deposits: Geological Survey of Canada, Bulletin 540, 106 pages.

Reddick, J. R., 1996a. Geological section of the property report, BLM Bharti Engineering Limited. Internal Report.

Reddick, J. R., 1996b. Overview, Recommendations, and Budgets for Magino Property, Consultants report.

Reddick, J. R., 2001a. The 2000 diamond drilling and sampling program, Magino Mine Property, Wawa Ontario. Report presented to Golden Goose Resources Inc. Prepared by Reddick Consulting Inc. Internal Report. 18 pages.

Reddick, J. R., 2001b. Block Model Resource Estimates for the Magino Mine Property, Wawa Ontario (Revised June 2001). Report presented to Golden Goose Resources Inc. Prepared by Reddick Consulting Inc. Report published on SEDAR website dated 15 May, 2002. 31 pages.

Reddick, J. R., 2002. The 2002 diamond drilling and sampling program, Magino Mine Property, Wawa Ontario. Report presented to Golden Goose Resources Inc. Prepared by Reddick Consulting Inc. Internal Report.

Ross, A.F., 2011. Prodigy Gold Incorporated: Mineral Resource Estimate Update, Magino Gold Project, Ste. Sault Marie Mining District, Ontario, Project No. V1111. NI43-101 Technical Report 2nd November 2011. 118 pages.

Ross, A.F., 2011. Mineral Resource Estimate, Magino Gold Project, Sault Ste. Marie Mining District, Ontario. Report presented to Prodigy Gold Inc. Report prepared by Snowden Mining Industry Consultants Inc. Report published on SEDAR website dated 28 February 2011. 93 pages.

Ross, A.F., Finch A., Yang D., Yu F., Teh H., 2011. Magino Property Preliminary Economic Assessment Technical Report. Report presented to Prodigy Gold Inc.

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 155 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario Report prepared by Snowden Mining Industry Consultants Inc., CWA Engineers Inc., Knight Piesold Canada. Report published on SEDAR website dated 29 March 2011.

Sage, R. P., 1984. Goudreau-Lochalsh Area, District of Algoma; in Summary of Field Work and Other Activities 1984; Ontario Geological Survey, Miscellaneous Paper 119, pages 56-61.

Sage, R. P., 1985. Josephine-Goudreau Area, District of Algoma; in Summary of Field Work and Other Activities 1985; Ontario Geological Survey, Miscellaneous Paper 126, pages 90-94.

Sage, R. P., 1987. Preliminary interpretation of the relationship between economic mineralization and volcanic stratigraphy in the Wawa area; Ontario Geological Survey, Miscellaneous Paper 100, pages 41-44.

Sage, R. P., 1987a. Geology of the Goudreau-Lochalsh and Kabenung Lake Areas, District of Algoma; in Summary of Field Work and Other Activities 1987; Ontario Geological Survey, Miscellaneous Paper 137, pages 134-137.

Sage, R. P., 1990. Precambrian geology Finan Township. Ontario Geological Survey, Preliminary Map P3168, Scale 1: 15 840.

Sage, R. P., 1993. Geology of Aguonie, Bird, Finan and Jacobson townships, District of Algoma. Ontario Geological Survey, Open File Report 5588, 286 pages.

Sage, R. P., 1993a. Geology of Abotossaway, Corbiere, LeClaire and Musquash and part of Dunphy Township. Ontario Geological Survey, Open File Report 5587, 308 pages.

Sage, R. P., 1993b. Precambrian geology Aguonie Township. Ontario Geological Survey, Open File Map 217, Scale 1: 15 840.

Sage, R. P., 1993c. Precambrian geology Abotossaway Township. Ontario Geological Survey, Open File Map 223, Scale 1: 15 840.

Sage, R. P., 1993d. Precambrian geology Dunphy Township. Ontario Geological Survey, Open File Map 224, Scale 1: 15 840.

Sage, R. P., 1994. Geology of the Michipicoten greenstone belt. Ontario Geological Survey, Open File Report 5888, 592 pages.

Sage, R. P., Lightfoot, P. C., and Doherty, W., 1996a. Bimodal cyclical Archean basalts and rhyolites from the Michipicoten (Wawa) greenstone belt, Ontario: Geochemical evidence for magma contributions from asthenospheric mantle and ancient continental lithosphere near southern margin of the Superior Province. Precambrian Research, v. 76, page 119-153.

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 156 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario Sage, R. P., Lightfoot, P. C., and Doherty, W., 1996b. Geochemical characteristics of granitoid rocks from within Archean Michipicoten greenstone belt, Wawa Subprovince, Superior Province, Canada: Implications for source regions and tectonic evolution. Precambrian Research, v. 76, page 155-190.

Simpson, M. 2011. Specific Gravity Sampling Program. Internal report prepared for Prodigy Gold Incorporated. 151 pages.

Stott, G.M., Buse, S and Préfontaine, S., 2007. A possible Meso-archean Anticlinorium in the Berens River Region and its Tectonic Significance. Summary of Field Work and Other Activities 2007, Ontario Geological Survey, Open File Report 6213, pages 38-1 to 38-5.

Studemeister, P. A., 1983. The greenschist facies of an Archean assemblage near Wawa, Ontario. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, v. 20, pages 1409-1420. Studemeister, P. A., 1985. Gold-bearing veins around a felsic stock near Wawa, Ontario: implications for gold exploration; Canadian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy Bulletin, v. 78, pages 43-47.

Studemeister, P. A., and Kilias, S., 1987. Alteration pattern and fluid inclusions of gold bearing quartz veins in Archean trondhjemite near Wawa, Ontario, Canada Economic Geology, v. 82. pages 429-439.

Sutherland, K. S., 1987. Report on the Magino Gold Project. Report commissioned by Muscocho Explorations Ltd. Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario. Internal Report. 60 pages.

Turcotte, B., and Pelletier, C., 2008. Technical Report and Mineral Resource Estimate for the Magino Mine (according to the Regulation 43-101 and Form 43- 101F1). Report prepared by InnovExplo for Golden Goose Resources Inc. Report published on SEDAR website dated 3 July, 2008. 85 pages.

Turcotte, B., and Pelletier, C., 2009. Technical Report and Mineral Resource Estimate for the Magino Mine (according to Regulation 43-101 and 43-101F1). Report prepared by InnovExplo for Golden Goose Resources Inc. Report published on SEDAR website dated 29 May, 2009. 116 pages.

Turcotte, B., Pelletier, C., and Poirier S., 2010. Technical Report on the Preliminary Economic Assessment prepared by InnovExplo for Golden Goose Resources Inc. Unpublished draft report dated 3 June, 2010. Internal Report, Golden Goose Resources Inc. 176 pages.

Yong, P., Verma, N. S., and Dyck, D., 2008. Magino Mine tailings containment area dam safety inspection 2007. Submitted by AMEC Earth & Environmental. 10 pages.

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 157 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario Young, R. and Simms, D. 1992. Magino Mine Closure Plan – Muscocho Explorations Limited. October 1992. Prepared by Environmental Applications Group Limited. 60 pages, plans and appendices.

Young, R. and Simms, D. 1993. Magino Mine Closure Plan – Muscocho Explorations Limited- Revised January 1993. Prepared by HBT AGRA Limited (TC 630). 72 pages, appendices and maps in pocket.

Waldie, C., 2006. Report on the 2006 Diamond Drilling Program, Magino Mine Property, Wawa, Ontario, Canada. Golden Goose Resources Inc. Internal Report. 45 pages.

Williams, H. R., Scott, G. M., Heather, K. B., Muir, T. L., and Sage, R. P., 1991. Wawa Subprovince; in Geology of Ontario, (eds.) P. C. Thurston, H. R. Williams, R. H., Sutcliffe, and G. M. Scott; Ontario Geological Survey, Special Paper 4, pt.1, pages 485- 539.

Wilson, B. C., 1997. Structural Geology and Gold on the Magino Mine Property. Report prepared for Golden Goose Resources Inc. Internal Report. 21 pages.

Zaleski, E., van Breemen, O., and Peterson, V. L., 1999. Geological evolution of the Manitouwadge greenstone belt and Wawa-Quetico subprovince boundary, Superior Province, Ontario: Constrained by U-Pb zircon dates of supracrustal and plutonic rocks. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, v.36, pages 945-966.

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 158 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario 20.0 CERTIFICATE OF QUALIFIED PERSON

PATRICK HUXTABLE,MAIG(RPGEO)

I, Patrick Huxtable, MAIG (RPGeo), of Perth, Western Australia, do hereby certify:

• I am a Senior Resource Geologist with Tetra Tech WEI Inc. with a business address at Level 5, 220 St Georges Terrace, Perth, WA, 6000. • This certificate applies to the technical report entitled “Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario, dated October 4, 2012 (the “Technical Report”). • I am a graduate of Curtin University of Technology, (B.Sc., 1992). I am a member and RPGeo in good standing of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists (#2876) RPGeo #10,117. My relevant experience includes 18 years of experience in exploration and operations, including several years working in Archean gold deposits. I am a “Qualified Person” for purposes of National Instrument 43-101 (the “Instrument”). • I have not conducted a personal inspection of the Property that is the subject of this Technical Report. • I am responsible for Sections 1 to 11 and 14 to 20 inclusive of the Technical Report. • I am independent of Prodigy Gold Incorporated as defined by Section 1.5 of the Instrument. • I have no prior involvement with the Property that is the subject of the Technical Report. • I have read the Instrument and the sections of the Technical Report that I am responsible for has been prepared in compliance with the Instrument. • As of the date of this certificate, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, the sections of this Technical Report contain all scientific and technical information that is required to be disclosed to make the Technical Report not misleading.

Signed and dated this 4th day of October, 2012 at Perth, Western Australia.

“Original document signed and sealed by Patrick Huxtable, MAIG (RPGeo)” Patrick Huxtable, MAIG (RPGeo) Senior Resource Geologist Tetra Tech WEI Inc.

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 159 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario TODD MCCRACKEN,P.GEO.

I, Todd McCracken, P.Geo., of Sudbury, Ontario, do hereby certify:

• I am a Principal Geologist with Tetra Tech WEI Inc. with a business address at 101-957 Cambrian Heights, Sudbury, Ontario, P3C 5M6. • This certificate applies to the technical report entitled Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario, dated October 4, 2012 (the “Technical Report”). • I am a graduate of the University of Waterloo, (B.Sc. Honours, 1992). I am a member in good standing of the Association of Professional Geoscientists of Ontario (#0631). My relevant experience includes 20 years of experience in exploration and operations, including several years working in shear-hosted gold deposits. I am a “Qualified Person” for purposes of National Instrument 43-101 (the “Instrument”). • My most recent personal inspection of the Property was May 8 to 9, 2012 for two days. • I am responsible for Sections 12 and 20 of the Technical Report. • I am independent of Prodigy Gold Incorporated as defined by Section 1.5 of the Instrument. • I have no prior involvement with the Property that is the subject of the Technical Report. • I have read the Instrument and the sections of the Technical Report that I am responsible for has been prepared in compliance with the Instrument. • As of the date of this certificate, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, the sections of the Technical Report that I am responsible for contain all scientific and technical information that is required to be disclosed to make the technical report not misleading.

Signed and dated this 4th day of October, 2012 at Sudbury, Ontario.

“Original document signed and sealed by Todd McCracken, P.Geo.” Todd McCracken, P.Geo. Principal Geologist Tetra Tech WEI Inc.

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 160 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario TODD KANHAI,P.ENG.

I, Todd Kanhai, P.Eng., of Sudbury, Ontario, do hereby certify:

• I am a Metallurgical Engineer with Tetra Tech WEI Inc. with a business address at #101 – 957 Cambrian Heights, Sudbury, Ontario, P3C 5M6. • This certificate applies to the technical report entitled Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario, dated October 4, 2012 (the “Technical Report”). • I am a graduate of Laurentian University, (M. A. Sc., 2000). I am a member in good standing of the Professional Engineers of Ontario, License #90471020. My relevant experience is with previous conceptual, preliminary economic assessment, prefeasibility, and feasibility studies while working with Tetra Tech WEI. I am a “Qualified Person” for purposes of National Instrument 43-101 (the “Instrument”). • My most recent personal inspection of the Property was November 2, 2011 for one day. • I am responsible for Section 13.0 and 20.0 of the Technical Report. • I am independent of Prodigy Gold Incorporated as defined by Section 1.5 of the Instrument. • I have no prior involvement with the Property that is the subject of the Technical Report. • I have read the Instrument and the sections of the Technical Report that I am responsible for have been prepared in compliance with the Instrument. • As of the date of this certificate, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, the sections of the Technical Report that I am responsible for contains all scientific and technical information that is required to be disclosed to make the technical report not misleading.

Signed and dated this 4th day of October, 2012 at Sudbury, Ontario

“Original document signed and sealed by Todd Kanhai, P.Eng.” Todd Kanhai, P.Eng. Metallurgical Engineer Tetra Tech WEI Inc.

Prodigy Gold Incorporated 161 1295890100-REP-R0001-02 Technical Report on the Magino Property, Wawa, Ontario