DOCSLIB.ORG

Jordana George Diss

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Jordana George Diss ABSTRACT Transforming Viscous Data into Liquid Data: How Does Intermediating through Digital Platforms Impact Data? Jordana Jeanne George, Ph.D. Mentor: Dorothy E. Leidner, Ph.D. This study examines how a data platform intermediary enables the evolution of viscous data into liquid data. Viscous, or difficult to use, data is the result of data usage problems that often plague information systems. Data may be viscous because of poor quality, staleness, size issues, unusable formats, missing metadata, unknown history, mysterious provenance, poor access for users, and inability to move data between systems. Viscous data is problematic to use and difficult to incorporate into decision making. On the other hand, liquid data is high quality, formatted to be machine-readable, has provenance and metadata, is easy to move in and out of different systems, is accessible by users, and lends itself well to being used for decision making. Using a longitudinal case study that follows a data platform intermediary startup company from late 2015 to 2018, I break down elements of the platform into data users, data providers, and data intermediaries. Using a lens from the Community of Practice literature, I show how social learning, data wrangling, data complementing, and data liberalizing on a digital data platform transform data from viscous to liquid. This work contributes by providing a different perspective to data management, a means to address a dearth of data skills, and a way to make data more usable for both individuals and institutions. Transforming Viscous Data into Liquid Data: How Does Intermediating through Digital Platforms Impact Data by Jordana J. George, B.A., M.B.A., M.F.A. A Dissertation Approved by the Department of Information Systems Jonathan Trower, Ph.D., Chairperson Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Baylor University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Approved by the Dissertation Committee Dorothy E. Leidner, Ph.D., Chairperson Jonathan Trower, Ph.D. Timothy Kayworth, Ph.D. Debra Burleson, Ph.D. Peter Klein, Ph.D. Accepted by the Graduate School August 2019 J. Larry Lyon, Ph.D., Dean Page bearing signatures is kept on file in the Graduate School. Copyright © 2019 by Jordana Jeanne George All rights reserved TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES ............................................................................................................. vii LIST OF TABLES .............................................................................................................. viii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ................................................................................................... ix DEDICATION ...................................................................................................................... x CHAPTER ONE ................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 1 CHAPTER TWO ................................................................................................................. 8 Foundations ....................................................................................................................... 8 Overview of the Literature ................................................................................. 8 Literature Review Method ................................................................................. 8 Data .................................................................................................................. 11 Data Systems .................................................................................................... 25 The Data Cycle ................................................................................................ 31 Sensitizing Device ............................................................................................ 53 CHAPTER THREE ............................................................................................................ 57 Method ............................................................................................................................. 57 Site Selection, Data Collection, and Description ............................................ 60 Analysis Methods ............................................................................................. 64 Setting: data.world ............................................................................................ 65 data.world Data Providers ............................................................................... 67 data.world Data Users ...................................................................................... 70 data.world Data Intermediaries ....................................................................... 72 CHAPTER FOUR .............................................................................................................. 74 Analysis ............................................................................................................................ 74 data.world Data Providers ............................................................................... 76 data.world Data Users ...................................................................................... 81 data.world Data Intermediaries ....................................................................... 83 CHAPTER SEVEN ............................................................................................................ 90 Discussion ........................................................................................................................ 90 CHAPTER EIGHT ............................................................................................................ 94 Implications ...................................................................................................................... 94 Implications for Understanding Data Liquidity .............................................. 95 Implications for Working with Data ............................................................... 96 v Implications for Understanding People Who Work with Data ..................... 97 Implications for Open Government Data ....................................................... 98 Implications for Personal Data Use ................................................................ 99 Practical Implications ..................................................................................... 100 Future Research ............................................................................................. 101 CHAPTER NINE ............................................................................................................. 103 Conclusion ..................................................................................................................... 103 APPENDIX ....................................................................................................................... 106 Coding Details ................................................................................................................ 106 REFERENCES .................................................................................................................. 110 vi LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. A Polylithic Framework of RTD Papers (from Leidner, 2018) ........................... 10 Figure 2. Literature Review Data Topics ............................................................................. 11 Figure 3. 5 Stars of Linked Open Data ................................................................................ 21 Figure 4. Amsterdam Museum Item Search ....................................................................... 23 Figure 5. Data Flows ............................................................................................................ 32 Figure 6. Data User Business Model Framework ............................................................... 40 Figure 7. data.world Developer Toolkit .............................................................................. 66 Figure 8. Platform Users, Utilization, Outcome .................................................................. 76 Figure 9. AP Data Project on Opioid Prescriptions ............................................................ 86 Figure 10. Liquid Data Process ............................................................................................ 91 vii LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Viscous and Liquid Data ....................................................................................... 17 Table 2. Taxonomy of Data Providers ................................................................................ 36 Table 3. How Organizational Data Users Employ External Data ...................................... 40 Table 4. Data Users ............................................................................................................. 44 Table 5. Data Intermediaries ............................................................................................... 50 Table 6. Literature Resource Types .................................................................................... 59 Table 7. Data Sources .......................................................................................................... 62 Table 8. Primary Interviews & Meetings ............................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Licensing Open Government Data Jyh-An Lee
    Hastings Business Law Journal Volume 13 Article 2 Number 2 Winter 2017 Winter 2017 Licensing Open Government Data Jyh-An Lee Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/ hastings_business_law_journal Part of the Business Organizations Law Commons Recommended Citation Jyh-An Lee, Licensing Open Government Data, 13 Hastings Bus. L.J. 207 (2017). Available at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/hastings_business_law_journal/vol13/iss2/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Hastings Business Law Journal by an authorized editor of UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 2 - LEE MACROED.DOCX (DO NOT DELETE) 5/5/2017 11:09 AM Licensing Open Government Data Jyh-An Lee* Governments around the world create and collect an enormous amount of data that covers important environmental, educational, geographical, meteorological, scientific, demographic, transport, tourism, health insurance, crime, occupational safety, product safety, and many other types of information.1 This data is generated as part of a government’s daily functions.2 Given government data’s exceptional social and economic value, former U.S. President Barack Obama described it as a “national asset.”3 For various policy reasons, open government data (“OGD”) has become a popular governmental practice and international * Assistant Professor at the Faculty of Law in the Chinese University
    [Show full text]
  • Canada's Action Plan on Open Government 2014-16, Canada’S Second Open Government Plan to the Open Government Partnership (OGP)
    UNCLASSIFIED / NON CLASSIFIÉ CANADA’S ACTION PLAN ON OPEN GOVERNMENT 2014-2016 End-of-Term Self-Assessment Report January 2017 UNCLASSIFIED / NON CLASSIFIÉ UNCLASSIFIED / NON CLASSIFIÉ Contents Canada’s Action Plan on Open Government 2014-2016 .............................................................................. 4 1. Introduction and Background ............................................................................................................... 4 2. Action Plan Process ............................................................................................................................... 4 3. Independent Reporting Mechanism Recommendations ...................................................................... 5 4. Implementation of Action Plan Commitments ..................................................................................... 7 Commitment 1: Directive on Open Government.................................................................................. 8 Commitment 2: Open Data Canada ...................................................................................................... 9 Commitment 3: Canadian Open Data Exchange (ODX) ...................................................................... 11 Commitment 4: Open Data for Development (OD4D)........................................................................ 14 Commitment 5: Open Data Core Commitment .................................................................................. 17 Commitment 6: Open Science ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Welcome to Max Edwards, Rabbinical Assistant
    A welcoming community of Jewish life, worship & learning www.tbanj.org Bulletin Summer 5780/2020 WELCOME TO MAX EDWARDS, RABBINICAL ASSISTANT Max Edwards joined Temple B’nai Abraham as the rabbinical assistant on July 1, 2020. Max is currently in his final year of rabbinical school at Hebrew College in Newton, MA, and will be ordained as rabbi and re- ceive a Master of Jewish Education in June 2021. Before joining Temple B’nai Abraham, Max was the rabbinic intern at Temple Shalom in Newton, MA and Beth Israel Congregation in Waterville, ME. Max also worked as a chaplain at Brigham and Women’s Hospi- tal in Boston, completing two units of Clinical Pastoral Education. Originally from Rochester, Minnesota, Max graduated with honors from Macalester College, earning a B.A. in Religious Studies and Classics. Max also received a Master of Theological Studies from Harvard Divinity School, with coursework focusing on Hebrew Bible and early Christian formation. Max is also a Yiddish speaker, and has spent time in Vilnius, Lithuania studying Yiddish language and culture. LIFE CYCLE EVENTS As of July 14, 2020 MAZEL TOV Jessica & Jay Kooper, son, Ethan, becoming a Bar Mitzvah Andrea Schechter, daughter, Samantha, becoming a Bat Mitzvah Beth & Claude Krause, daughter, Anna, becoming a Bat Mitzvah Ethel & Bob Singer, granddaughter, Anna Krause, becoming a Bat Mitzvah Julie & Matt Kaplan, daughter, Ellie, becoming a Bat Mitzvah Barbara & Cliff Sobel, granddaughter, Ellie Kaplan, becoming a Bat Mitzvah Marlene & Alan Moscowitz, granddaughter, Ruby Belle
    [Show full text]
  • Patent "Trespass" and the Royalty Gap: Exploring the Nature and Impact of Patent Holdout Bowman Heiden
    Santa Clara High Technology Law Journal Volume 34 | Issue 2 Article 1 1-3-2018 Patent "Trespass" and the Royalty Gap: Exploring the Nature and Impact of Patent Holdout Bowman Heiden Nicolas Petit Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.scu.edu/chtlj Part of the Intellectual Property Law Commons, and the Science and Technology Law Commons Recommended Citation Bowman Heiden and Nicolas Petit, Patent "Trespass" and the Royalty Gap: Exploring the Nature and Impact of Patent Holdout, 34 Santa Clara High Tech. L.J. 179 (). Available at: http://digitalcommons.law.scu.edu/chtlj/vol34/iss2/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Santa Clara Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Santa Clara High Technology Law Journal by an authorized editor of Santa Clara Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. PATENT “TRESPASS” AND THE ROYALTY GAP: EXPLORING THE NATURE AND IMPACT OF PATENT HOLDOUT Bowman Heiden† & Nicolas Petit‡ This paper studies a problem known as “patent holdout.” Part I reviews the literature on holdout, with a specific emphasis on patents. The literature shows that the ordinary concept of holdout refers to the non-transacting conduct of a property owner, and that “patent trespass” is a better characterization for technology implementers’ attempt to evade concluding licensing agreements with patent owners. Part II proposes a definition and illustrations of patent trespass, relying on the qualitative data collected during interviews with industry stakeholders as well as on an analysis of U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • EXHIBIT a Case 2:14-Cv-00540-JCC Document 1-1 Filed 04/11/14 Page 2 of 6
    Case 2:14-cv-00540-JCC Document 1-1 Filed 04/11/14 Page 1 of 6 EXHIBIT A Case 2:14-cv-00540-JCC Document 1-1 Filed 04/11/14 Page 2 of 6 THE WEISER LAW FIRM WWW .WEISERLAWFIRM.COM PENNSYLVANIA CALIFORNIA 22 CASSATT AvE. 12707 HIGH BLUFF DRIVE, SUITE 200 BERWYN, PA 19312 SAN DIEGO, CA 92130 TELEPHONE: (610) 225-2677 TELEPHONE : (858) 794-1441 FACSIMILE : (610) 408-8062 FACSIMILE : (858) 794-1450 March 22, 2013 VIA CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED William H. Gates III Chairman of the Board of Directors Microsoft Corporation One Microsoft Way Redmond, WA 98052-6399 Re: Shareholder Demand Pursuant to Washington Law Dear Mr. Gates: The undersigned firms represent Kim Barovic (the "Stockholder"), a current stockholder of Microsoft Corporation ("Microsoft" or the "Company"). Pursuant to Washington law, we write on behalf of the Stockholder to demand that the Company's Board of Directors (the "Board") take action to remedy breaches of fiduciary duties by certain current and/or former directors and executive officers of the Company, including yourself ("Gates"), Steve Ballmer ("Ballmer"), Dina Dublon ("Dublon"), Maria M. Klawe ("Klawe"), Stephen J. Luczo ("Luczo"), David F. Marquardt ("Marquardt"), Charles H. Noski (''Noski"), Helmut Panke ("Panke"), John W. Thompson ("Thompson"), Peter Klein ("Klein"), Andrew Lees ("Lees"), Eric Rudder ("Rudder"), Brad Smith ("Smith") and B. Kevin Turner ("Turner"). Collectively, the foregoing executive officers and/or directors of the Company will be referred to herein as "Management." As you are aware, by reason of their positions as officers and/or directors of Microsoft and because of their ability to control the business and corporate affairs of Microsoft, members of Management owed and owe Microsoft and its shareholders the fiduciary obligations of good faith, loyalty, and due care.
    [Show full text]
  • Gail Fialkov , Et Al. V. Microsoft Corporation, Et Al. 13-CV-02039
    Case 2:13-cv-02039-RSM Document 52 Filed 01/24/14 Page 1 of 41 1 THE HONORABLE RICARDO S. MARTINEZ 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 10 AT SEATTLE 11 GAIL FIALKOV, Individually and on Behalf No. 2:13-cv-02039-RSM 12 of All Others Similarly Situated, CLASS ACTION 13 Plaintiff, CONSOLIDATED COMPLAINT FOR 14 vs. VIOLATIONS OF THE FEDERAL SECURITIES LAWS 15 MICROSOFT CORPORATION, et al., 16 Defendants. 17 DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 907786_1 CONSOLIDATED COMPLAINT FOR Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP II VIOLATIONS OF THE FEDERAL SECURITIES 655 West Broadway, Suite 1900, San Diego, CA 92101 Telephone: 619/231-1058 • Fax: 619/231-7423 LAWS (2:13-cv-02039-RSM) Case 2:13-cv-02039-RSM Document 52 Filed 01/24/14 Page 2 of 41 1 Lead Plaintiffs, the Seafarers Pension Plan, the Seafarers Officers and Employees Pension 2 Plan, the United Industrial Workers Pension Plan, the MCS Supplementary Pension Plan and the 3 Oklahoma Firefighters Pension and Retirement System (“Lead Plaintiffs”), on behalf of themselves 4 and all other persons similarly situated, allege the following based upon personal knowledge as to 5 themselves and their own acts, and information and belief as to all other matters, based upon, inter 6 alia, the investigation conducted by and through their attorneys. 7 NATURE OF THE ACTION 8 1. This is a federal securities class action brought against Microsoft Corporation 9 (“Microsoft” or the “Company”) and three of its senior officers for violations of the Securities 10 Exchange Act of 1934 (the “1934 Act”).
    [Show full text]
  • Open Government Action Plan Initiative Interim Report
    Open Government Action Plan Initiative Interim Report Date: February 27, 2014 [Final Version] © 2014 Delvinia www.delvinia.com 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS PROJECT BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE ............................................................... 4 APPROACH .................................................................................................................... 4 KEY FINDINGS ............................................................................................................... 7 NEXT STEPS ................................................................................................................ 14 APPENDIX A: BEST PRACTICE REVIEW ................................................................... 16 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................................................... 16 INTRODUCTIONS ................................................................................................................................... 17 OPEN ENGAGEMENT ............................................................................................................................ 17 OPEN GOVERNANCE ............................................................................................................................ 25 ACCESS TO INFORMATION .................................................................................................................. 31 OPEN DATA ...........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • When Standards Collide with Intellectual Property: Standard Setting Organizations, Technology, and Microsoft V
    When Standards Collide with Intellectual Property: Standard Setting Organizations, Technology, and Microsoft v. Motorola Cynthia Laury Dahl University of Pennsylvania Law School January 2018 www.codes-and-standards.org This material was developed under the auspices of the Penn Program on Regulation using federal funds under awards 70NANB15H343 and 70NANB15H344 from the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), U.S. Department of Commerce. Any statements, findings, conclusions, and recommendations are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Penn Program on Regulation, the University of Pennsylvania, NIST, or the U.S. Department of Commerce. When Standards Collide with Intellectual Property: Standard Setting Organizations, Technology, and Microsoft v. Motorola Cynthia Laury Dahl In the summer of 2010, Motorola Inc. (“Motorola”) was in turmoil. After a flurry of successes in 2004, when it launched its Razr mobile phone, Motorola was most recently reeling from a $4.3 billion loss to the company between 2006 and 2009. It was looking forward to spinning off its faltering mobile phone and cable equipment divisions into a second publicly owned company called Motorola Mobility (“MM”), which would operate separately from the more traditionally stable public safety division. Although MM had an uncertain future, parent Motorola would leave MM with a solid and valuable legacy: Due to Motorola’s decades-old tradition of research and development in all realms of technology, MM would inherit a patent portfolio of over 17,000 active patents after the split.1 Motorola’s biggest competitors in 2010 were Apple and Samsung. But while those competitors were debuting devices that incorporated increasingly innovative technology, Motorola’s devices did not even incorporate many of the company’s own patented inventions.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary 1 of 24
    "ISRAEL M. KIRZNER AND THE ENTREPRENEURIAL MARKET PROCESS" A DISCUSSION HELD IN MARCH, 2017. Online: <http://oll.libertyfund.org/pages/lm-kirzner> Ebooks: <http://oll.libertyfund.org/titles/2730>. Israel M. Kirzner Summary In this Liberty Matters online discussion Peter Boettke of George Mason University examines Israel Kirzner’s insights into the rivalrous nature of competitive behavior and the market process, his analysis of market theory and the operation of the price system, the institutional environment that enables a market economy to realize mutual gains from trade and to continuously discover gains from innovation, and to produce a system characterized by economic growth and wealth creation. Boettke concludes by arguing that Kirzner has done more than nearly any other living modern economist to improve our understanding of competitive behavior and the operation of the price system in a market economy. Boettke is joined in the discussion by Peter G. Klein, professor of entrepreneurship at Baylor University’s Hankamer School of Business, Mario Rizzo, professor of economics at New York University, and Frédéric Sautet, associate professor at The Catholic University of America. Boettke and Sautet are the editors of Liberty Fund’s 10 volume The Collected Works of Israel M. Kirzner. 1 of 24 About Liberty Matters and the Online Library of Liberty can be found at <http://oll.libertyfund.org/titles/2516>. “Liberty Matters” is a project of Liberty Fund, Inc. which is part of the Online Library of Liberty website. Every two months we ask a leading Copyright & Fair Use Statement scholar to present an argument on a particular topic “pertaining to liberty” in a “Lead Essay” and to develop this argument at some length.
    [Show full text]
  • 1. Executive Summary 2. Open Data Overview
    1. Executive Summary Open data is structured, machine-readable data that is freely shared, used and built on without restrictions or cost. Advocates and organizations such as the Global Open Data Initiative say that data owned by governments should be publicly accessible, since public money was used to fund the work. The open data movement is gaining momentum worldwide and open data has been adopted in over 50 Canadian municipalities. In mid-2015, an Open Data Portal will be made available online where anyone can download the City of Greater Sudbury’s available open data for free. Staff will continue to proactively publish datasets on the portal after the launch and the public may also make suggestions about datasets that could be released as open data. This program will be implemented on an ongoing basis and within existing resources. 2. Open Data Overview Open data is provided in machine-readable format and with a licence that has few restrictions, so that the data can easily be re-used. Datasets released as open data are provided as collected, unless privacy, contractual, security, privilege or other limitations restrict the release of all or parts of the data in the dataset. An example of municipal government open data is a Microsoft Excel file listing bus stop locations. Open Data in Other Canadian Municipalities In 2009, the City of Nanaimo was the first municipality to implement open data in Canada. Since then, over 50 Canadian municipalities and regions have released their own open data catalogues, 18 of which are in Ontario. Phone interviews have been conducted with 12 Canadian municipalities with open data programs to gather information, identify open data trends and get feedback on any lessons learned.
    [Show full text]
  • Microsoft Reports Record Fourth-Quarter Results Broad-Based Strength Drives Double-Digit Revenue Growth in All Business Segments
    Microsoft_Investor_Relations_News_Release Microsoft Reports Record Fourth-Quarter Results Broad-based strength drives double-digit revenue growth in all business segments REDMOND, Wash. — July 22, 2010 — Microsoft Corp. today announced record fourth-quarter revenue of $16.04 billion for the quarter ended June 30, 2010, a 22% increase from the same period of the prior year. Operating income, net income and diluted earnings per share for the quarter were $5.93 billion, $4.52 billion and $0.51 per share, which represented increases of 49%, 48% and 50%, respectively, when compared with the prior year period. “This quarter’s record revenue reflects the breadth of our offerings and our continued product momentum,” said Peter Klein, chief financial officer. “The revenue growth, combined with our ongoing cost discipline, helped us achieve another quarter of margin expansion.” Product momentum continued during the quarter with the successful launch of Office 2010 and strong performance from existing products including Windows 7, which has sold more than 175 million licenses to date, Windows Server, Xbox, and Bing, which achieved its 13th consecutive month of share gain. “We saw strong sales execution across all of our businesses, particularly in the enterprise with Windows 7 and Office 2010,” said Kevin Turner, chief operating officer. “Our transition to cloud services is well underway with offerings like Windows Azure and our Business Productivity Online Services, and we look forward to continuing our product momentum this fall with the upcoming launches of Windows Phone 7 and Xbox Kinect.” For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2010, Microsoft reported record revenue of $62.48 billion, a 7% increase from the prior year.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Data Endgame Countering the Digital Consensus
    CIGI Papers No. 186 — August 2018 Open Data Endgame Countering the Digital Consensus Bianca Wylie CIGI Papers No. 186 — August 2018 Open Data Endgame: Countering the Digital Consensus Bianca Wylie CIGI Masthead Executive President Rohinton P. Medhora Deputy Director, International Intellectual Property Law and Innovation Bassem Awad Chief Financial Officer and Director of Operations Shelley Boettger Director of the Global Economy Program Robert Fay Director of the International Law Research Program Oonagh Fitzgerald Director of the Global Security & Politics Program Fen Osler Hampson Director of Human Resources Laura Kacur Deputy Director, International Environmental Law Silvia Maciunas Deputy Director, International Economic Law Hugo Perezcano Díaz Director, Evaluation and Partnerships Erica Shaw Managing Director and General Counsel Aaron Shull Director of Communications and Digital Media Spencer Tripp Publications Publisher Carol Bonnett Senior Publications Editor Jennifer Goyder Publications Editor Susan Bubak Publications Editor Patricia Holmes Publications Editor Nicole Langlois Publications Editor Lynn Schellenberg Graphic Designer Melodie Wakefield For publications enquiries, please contact [email protected]. Communications For media enquiries, please contact [email protected]. @cigionline Copyright © 2018 by the Centre for International Governance Innovation The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Centre for International Governance Innovation or its Board of Directors. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution — Non-commercial — No Derivatives License. To view this license, visit (www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/). For re-use or distribution, please include this copyright notice. Printed in Canada on paper containing 100% post-consumer fibre and certified by the Forest Stewardship Council® and the Sustainable Forestry Initiative.
    [Show full text]