DOCSLIB.ORG

A 2-7 Hernád-Takta Alegység Vízgyűjtő-Gazdálkodási Terve

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A 2-7 Hernád-Takta Alegység Vízgyűjtő-Gazdálkodási Terve A Víz Keretirányelv hazai megvalósítása VÍZGYŐJTİ-GAZDÁLKODÁSI TERV 2-7. HERNÁD- TAKTA közreadja: Vízügyi és Környezetvédelmi Központi Igazgatóság, Észak-magyarországi Környezetvédelmi és Vízügyi Igazgatóság 2010. március Vízgyőjtı-gazdálkodási Terv 2-7 Hernád - Takta vízgyüjtı alegység TARTALOM BEVEZETİ...........................................................................................................................1 1 VÍZGYŐJTİK ÉS VÍZTESTEK JELLEMZÉSE ..............................................................2 1.1 Természeti környezet........................................................................................................................2 1.1.1 Domborzat, éghajlat................................................................................................................................... 3 1.1.2 Földtan, talajtakaró .................................................................................................................................... 3 1.1.3 Vízföldtan................................................................................................................................................... 6 1.1.4 Vízrajz........................................................................................................................................................ 6 1.1.5 Él ıvilág ...................................................................................................................................................... 7 1.2 Társadalmi és gazdasági viszonyok ...............................................................................................8 1.2.1 Településhálózat, népességföldrajz........................................................................................................... 8 1.2.2 Területhasználat ...................................................................................................................................... 10 1.2.3 Gazdaságföldrajz..................................................................................................................................... 12 1.3 A vízgy őjt ı-gazdálkodási tervezés szerepl ıi ...............................................................................14 1.3.1 Hatáskörrel rendelkez ı hatóság .............................................................................................................. 14 1.3.2 A tervezést végz ı szervezetek ................................................................................................................ 17 1.3.3 Határvízi kapcsolatok............................................................................................................................... 18 1.3.4 Érintettek.................................................................................................................................................. 19 1.4 Víztestek jellemzése........................................................................................................................23 1.4.1 Vízfolyás víztestek ................................................................................................................................... 24 1.4.2 Állóvíz víztestek ....................................................................................................................................... 26 1.4.3 Er ısen módosított és mesterséges víztestek .......................................................................................... 28 1.4.4 Felszín alatti víztestek.............................................................................................................................. 31 2 EMBERI TEVÉKENYSÉGBİL EREDİ TERHELÉSEK ÉS HATÁSOK ..........................36 2.1 Pontszer ő szennyez ıforrások .......................................................................................................36 2.1.1 Települési szennyez ıforrások ................................................................................................................. 36 2.1.2 Ipari szennyez ıforrások, szennyezett területek ....................................................................................... 40 2.1.3 Mez ıgazdasági szennyez ıforrások......................................................................................................... 42 2.1.4 Balesetszer ő szennyezések .................................................................................................................... 45 2.2 Diffúz szennyez ıforrások...............................................................................................................46 2.2.1 Települések ............................................................................................................................................. 46 2.2.2 Mez ıgazdasági tevékenység................................................................................................................... 47 2.3 Természetes állapotot befolyásoló hidromorfológiai beavatkozások.......................................50 ő ı 2.3.1 Keresztirányú m tárgyak (duzzasztók, fenéklépcs k, zsilipek) ............................................................... 50 2.3.2 Folyószabályozás, mederrendezés, árvízvédelmi töltések ...................................................................... 51 2.3.3 Vízjárást módosító beavatkozások, vízkormányzás................................................................................. 52 2.3.4 Meder és partrendezés, hajózóútbiztosítás, és fenntartási tevékenységek ............................................. 53 2.4 Vízkivételek ......................................................................................................................................53 Vízgyőjtı-gazdálkodási Terv 2-7 Hernád - Takta vízgyüjtı alegység 2.4.1 Felszíni vizekb ıl....................................................................................................................................... 53 2.4.2 Felszín alatti vizekb ıl............................................................................................................................... 55 2.5 Egyéb terhelések.............................................................................................................................56 2.5.1 Közlekedés .............................................................................................................................................. 56 2.5.2 Rekreáció................................................................................................................................................. 57 2.5.3 Halászat................................................................................................................................................... 58 2.6 Az éghajlatváltozás várható hatásai..............................................................................................58 3 VÉDELEM ALATT ÁLLÓ TERÜLETEK........................................................................61 3.1 Ivóvízkivételek véd ıterületei..........................................................................................................61 3.1.1 Felszíni ivóvízbázisok .............................................................................................................................. 61 3.1.2 Ivóvízkivételek felszín alatti vízbázisból................................................................................................... 61 3.2 Tápanyag- és nitrát-érzékeny területek.........................................................................................64 3.2.1 Jogszabályi háttér.................................................................................................................................... 64 3.2.2. Nitrátérzékeny területek az alegységen................................................................................................... 65 3.3 Természetes fürd ıhelyek ...............................................................................................................65 3.3.1 Jogszabályi háttér.................................................................................................................................... 65 3.3.2 Természetes fürd ıhelyek kijelölésével érintett víztestek ......................................................................... 66 3.4 Védett természeti területek ............................................................................................................67 3.4.1 Jogszabályi háttér.................................................................................................................................... 67 3.4.2 Védett területek listája.............................................................................................................................. 69 3.5 Halas vizek .......................................................................................................................................82 4 MONITORING HÁLÓZATOK ÉS PROGRAMOK ..........................................................83 4.1 Felszíni vizek monitoringja ............................................................................................................83 4.2 Felszín alatti vizek monitoringja ....................................................................................................85 4.3 Védett területek monitoring programja.........................................................................................86 5 A VIZEK ÁLLAPOTÁNAK MINİSÍTÉSE .....................................................................88 5.1 Vízfolyás víztestek ökológiai
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Fauna Lepidopterologica Volgo-Uralensis" 150 Years Later: Changes and Additions
    ©Ges. zur Förderung d. Erforschung von Insektenwanderungen e.V. München, download unter www.zobodat.at Atalanta (August 2000) 31 (1/2):327-367< Würzburg, ISSN 0171-0079 "Fauna lepidopterologica Volgo-Uralensis" 150 years later: changes and additions. Part 5. Noctuidae (Insecto, Lepidoptera) by Vasily V. A n ik in , Sergey A. Sachkov , Va d im V. Z o lo t u h in & A n drey V. Sv ir id o v received 24.II.2000 Summary: 630 species of the Noctuidae are listed for the modern Volgo-Ural fauna. 2 species [Mesapamea hedeni Graeser and Amphidrina amurensis Staudinger ) are noted from Europe for the first time and one more— Nycteola siculana Fuchs —from Russia. 3 species ( Catocala optata Godart , Helicoverpa obsoleta Fabricius , Pseudohadena minuta Pungeler ) are deleted from the list. Supposedly they were either erroneously determinated or incorrect noted from the region under consideration since Eversmann 's work. 289 species are recorded from the re­ gion in addition to Eversmann 's list. This paper is the fifth in a series of publications1 dealing with the composition of the pres­ ent-day fauna of noctuid-moths in the Middle Volga and the south-western Cisurals. This re­ gion comprises the administrative divisions of the Astrakhan, Volgograd, Saratov, Samara, Uljanovsk, Orenburg, Uralsk and Atyraus (= Gurjev) Districts, together with Tataria and Bash­ kiria. As was accepted in the first part of this series, only material reliably labelled, and cover­ ing the last 20 years was used for this study. The main collections are those of the authors: V. A n i k i n (Saratov and Volgograd Districts), S.
    [Show full text]
  • Végétations Amphibies
    Végétations amphibies amphibies Végétations 120 GUIDE DES VÉGÉTATIONS DES ZONES HUMIDES DE NORMANDIE ORIENTALE GUIDE DES VÉGÉTATIONS DES ZONES HUMIDES DE NORMANDIE ORIENTALE 121 Végétations annuelles des vases exondées Bidentetea tripartitae W. Levy W. - - A. Dardillac - A. Dardillac - Bidens cernua Bidens Oxybasis rubra Bidens tripartita A. Dardillac - J. Buchet J. - - Bidentetea tripartitae Oxybasis glauca glauca Oxybasis J. Buchet Persicaria maculosa - Localisation (?) - B. Toussaint Rumex maritimus Photo : J. Buchet DESCRIPTION DE LA CLASSE substrat (humidité, richesse), de la période d’exondation milieux les plus asséchés et les plus perturbés, on peut fragmentaires et pauvres en espèces, généralement peu (et des fluctuations des niveaux d’eau), des conditions également noter des espèces rudérales des Sisymbrietea étendues et souvent réduites à des linéaires le long des Végétations pionnières herbacées dominées par des climatiques saisonnières (végétation à éclipses) et officinalis ou des Stellarietea mediae (principalement des cours d’eau ou en périphérie des pièces d’eau, excepté plantes annuelles se développant sur des sols riches en locales, et des espèces et associations concernées. espèces de la famille des Amaranthacées (Amaranthus dans quelques zones particulières où ces communautés éléments nutritifs (azote notamment) et qui s’exondent Ces végétations étant pionnières et essentiellement div. sp., Chenopodium div. sp. Oxybasis div. sp., Lypandra sont plus étendues. progressivement. Ces communautés se développent composées de plantes annuelles, elles sont très sensibles polysperma). Cette classe de végétation est particulièrement bien de l’été jusqu’à l’automne sur des substrats plus ou à la concurrence, en particulier par les grands hélophytes. représentée dans les étangs de la vallée de l’Avre ainsi moins vaseux restant toujours humides, au moins en que dans de nombreuses mares de la plaine du Neubourg profondeur.
    [Show full text]
  • Contribution to the Knowledge of the Fauna of Bombyces, Sphinges And
    driemaandelijks tijdschrift van de VLAAMSE VERENIGING VOOR ENTOMOLOGIE Afgiftekantoor 2170 Merksem 1 ISSN 0771-5277 Periode: oktober – november – december 2002 Erkenningsnr. P209674 Redactie: Dr. J–P. Borie (Compiègne, France), Dr. L. De Bruyn (Antwerpen), T. C. Garrevoet (Antwerpen), B. Goater (Chandlers Ford, England), Dr. K. Maes (Gent), Dr. K. Martens (Brussel), H. van Oorschot (Amsterdam), D. van der Poorten (Antwerpen), W. O. De Prins (Antwerpen). Redactie-adres: W. O. De Prins, Nieuwe Donk 50, B-2100 Antwerpen (Belgium). e-mail: [email protected]. Jaargang 30, nummer 4 1 december 2002 Contribution to the knowledge of the fauna of Bombyces, Sphinges and Noctuidae of the Southern Ural Mountains, with description of a new Dichagyris (Lepidoptera: Lasiocampidae, Endromidae, Saturniidae, Sphingidae, Notodontidae, Noctuidae, Pantheidae, Lymantriidae, Nolidae, Arctiidae) Kari Nupponen & Michael Fibiger [In co-operation with Vladimir Olschwang, Timo Nupponen, Jari Junnilainen, Matti Ahola and Jari- Pekka Kaitila] Abstract. The list, comprising 624 species in the families Lasiocampidae, Endromidae, Saturniidae, Sphingidae, Notodontidae, Noctuidae, Pantheidae, Lymantriidae, Nolidae and Arctiidae from the Southern Ural Mountains is presented. The material was collected during 1996–2001 in 10 different expeditions. Dichagyris lux Fibiger & K. Nupponen sp. n. is described. 17 species are reported for the first time from Europe: Clostera albosigma (Fitch, 1855), Xylomoia retinax Mikkola, 1998, Ecbolemia misella (Püngeler, 1907), Pseudohadena stenoptera Boursin, 1970, Hadula nupponenorum Hacker & Fibiger, 2002, Saragossa uralica Hacker & Fibiger, 2002, Conisania arida (Lederer, 1855), Polia malchani (Draudt, 1934), Polia vespertilio (Draudt, 1934), Polia altaica (Lederer, 1853), Mythimna opaca (Staudinger, 1899), Chersotis stridula (Hampson, 1903), Xestia wockei (Möschler, 1862), Euxoa dsheiron Brandt, 1938, Agrotis murinoides Poole, 1989, Agrotis sp.
    [Show full text]
  • Scottish Macro-Moth List, 2015
    Notes on the Scottish Macro-moth List, 2015 This list aims to include every species of macro-moth reliably recorded in Scotland, with an assessment of its Scottish status, as guidance for observers contributing to the National Moth Recording Scheme (NMRS). It updates and amends the previous lists of 2009, 2011, 2012 & 2014. The requirement for inclusion on this checklist is a minimum of one record that is beyond reasonable doubt. Plausible but unproven species are relegated to an appendix, awaiting confirmation or further records. Unlikely species and known errors are omitted altogether, even if published records exist. Note that inclusion in the Scottish Invertebrate Records Index (SIRI) does not imply credibility. At one time or another, virtually every macro-moth on the British list has been reported from Scotland. Many of these claims are almost certainly misidentifications or other errors, including name confusion. However, because the County Moth Recorder (CMR) has the final say, dubious Scottish records for some unlikely species appear in the NMRS dataset. A modern complication involves the unwitting transportation of moths inside the traps of visiting lepidopterists. Then on the first night of their stay they record a species never seen before or afterwards by the local observers. Various such instances are known or suspected, including three for my own vice-county of Banffshire. Surprising species found in visitors’ traps the first time they are used here should always be regarded with caution. Clerical slips – the wrong scientific name scribbled in a notebook – have long caused confusion. An even greater modern problem involves errors when computerising the data.
    [Show full text]
  • Michael Fibiger 1945 - 2011
    Esperiana Band 16: 7-38 Schwanfeld, 06. Dezember 2011 ISBN 978-3-938249-01-7 Michael FIBIGER 1945 - 2011 Our dear friend and colleague, Michael FIBIGER, died on 16 February, 2011, peacefully and in the presence of the closest members of his family. For close on 18 months he had battled heroically and with characteristic determination against a particularly unpleasant form of cancer, and continued with his writing and research until close to the end. Michael was born on 29 June, 1945, in Hellerup, a suburb of Copenhagen, and began catching moths at the age of nine, particularly in the vicinity of the summer house where they stayed on the north coast of Zealand. By the time he was 11, he wanted to join the Danish Lepidoptera Society but was told he was too young and must wait “a couple of years”. So, exactly two years later he applied again and was accepted – as the youngest-ever Member of the Society. Michael always knew he wanted to be a teacher, and between 1965 and 1970 he attended training college at Hel- lerup Seminarium. Having graduated, he taught Danish, Biology and Special Education at Gentofte School until 1973. In the meantime, he studied Clinical Psychology at the University of Copenhagen from 1970 to 1976, and from 1973 to 1981 he became School Psychologist for elementary schools and high schools in the municipality of Gentofte, work which involved investigation and testing of children with psychiatric problems, counselling, supervi- sion and therapy. He was also an instructor in drug prevention for the Ministry of Education.
    [Show full text]
  • Noctuoid Moths (Lepidoptera, Noctuoidea) of the Southern Part of Karakalpakstan
    SJIF Impact Factor: 6.260| ISI I.F.Value:1.241| Journal DOI: 10.36713/epra2016 ISSN: 2455-7838(Online) EPRA International Journal of Research and Development (IJRD) Volume: 5 | Issue: 4 | April 2020 - Peer Reviewed Journal NOCTUOID MOTHS (LEPIDOPTERA, NOCTUOIDEA) OF THE SOUTHERN PART OF KARAKALPAKSTAN Bekchanov Khudaybergan Urinovich Docent, Faculty of Pedagogy, Department of methodology of pre-school education, Urgench State University Bekchanova Mohira Khudaybergan qizi PhD student of Khorezm Ma’mun Academy ABSTRACT The paper presents the results of faunal studies of the Lepidoptera group Noctuoidea in the southern part of Karakalpakstan, as well as a review of the literature on this topic. An annotated list of 51 species of 3 families is given: Erebidae, Nolidae and Noctuidae, which also includes previously published data on finds in the region. KEY WORDS: noctuoid, moths, Lepidoptera, Erebidae, Nolidae, Noctuidae, Karakalpakstan, ephemera, ephemerids, bush INTRODUCTION Sviridov, 2003; Kononenko, 2005; Matov et al., 2008; The family of Noctuidae is the largest family of Kononenko, 2010). This work is devoted to the study of Lepidoptera. About 30 thousand species are known in the the fauna of Lepidaptera in the southern part of world fauna, and this figure can hardly be considered Karakalpakstan in the spring-summer period. final. Uzbekistan stands out for its significant species abundance and zoogeographic diversity of the moths. The AREA OF THE STUDY study of the Noctuidae fauna of Uzbekistan has always The studies were conducted in the southern part been associated with the study of the Lepidoptera fauna of Karakalpakstan. Ephemeral plants and ephemeroids, of the Khorezm oasis.
    [Show full text]
  • Dit Document Bevat De Lijsten Met De Tijdens Het 5000-Soortenjaar Hollandse Duinen (2018) Waargenomen Soorten
    Dit document bevat de lijsten met de tijdens het 5000-soortenjaar Hollandse duinen (2018) waargenomen soorten. Dit zijn de lijsten waarop de artikelen in Holland’s Duinen nr. 75 zijn gebaseerd. Alleen soorten zijn in de lijst opgenomen waarvan de waarneming als betrouwbaar is bestempeld Van de volgende groepen zijn lijsten aanwezig: Mossen Korstmossen Vaatplanten Bodemfauna Nachtvlinders Bijen & Wespen Cicaden Wantsen Dagvlinders, libellen en sprinkhanen Mossen Nederlandse naam Wetenschappelijke naam Nederlandse naam Wetenschappelijke naam Gewoon Aloëmos Aloina aloides Gedrongen Kantmos Lophocolea heterophylla Gewoon Pluisdraadmos Amblystegium serpens Duintrapmos Lophozia excisa Echt Vetmos Aneura pinguis Halvemaantjesmos Lunularia cruciata Groot Rimpelmos Atrichum undulatum Parapluutjesmos Marchantia polymorpha Gewoon Knopjesmos Aulacomnium androgynum Blauw Boomvorkje Metzgeria fruticulosa Gewoon Smaragdsteeltje Barbula convoluta Bleek Boomvorkje Metzgeria furcata Kleismaragdsteeltje Barbula unguiculata Gewoon Sterrenmos Mnium hornum Bleek Dikkopmos Brachythecium albicans Watervedermos Octodiceras fontanum Moerasdikkopmos Brachythecium mildeanum Geelsteeltje Orthodontium lineare Gewoon Dikkopmos Brachythecium rutabulum Gewone Haarmuts Orthotrichum affine Fluweelmos Brachythecium velutinum Gesteelde Haarmuts Orthotrichum anomalum Oranjesteeltje Bryoerythrophyllum recurvirostre Grijze Haarmuts Orthotrichum diaphanum Netknikmos Bryum algovicum Broedhaarmuts Orthotrichum lyellii Ongewimperd Knikmos Bryum archangelicum Gekroesde Haarmuts Orthotrichum
    [Show full text]
  • The Lepidoptera of Bucharest and Its Surroundings (Romania)
    Travaux du Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle © 30 Décembre Vol. LIV (2) pp. 461–512 «Grigore Antipa» 2011 DOI: 10.2478/v10191-011-0028-9 THE LEPIDOPTERA OF BUCHAREST AND ITS SURROUNDINGS (ROMANIA) LEVENTE SZÉKELY Abstract. This study presents a synthesis of the current knowledge regarding the Lepidoptera fauna of Bucharest and the surrounding areas within a distance up to 50 kilometers around the Romanian capital. Data about the fauna composition are presented: the results of the research work beginning with the end of the 19th century, as well the results of the research work carried out in the last 15 years. The research initiated and done by the author himself, led to the identification of 180 species which were unknown in the past. Even if the natural habitats from this region have undergone through radical changes in the 20th century, the area still preserves a quite rich and interesting Lepidoptera fauna. The forests provide shelter to rich populations of the hawk moth Dolbina elegans A. Bang-Haas, 1912, one of the rarest Sphingidae in Europe, and some other species with high faunistical and zoogeographical value as: Noctua haywardi (Tams, 1926) (it is new record for the Romanian fauna from this area), Catocala dilecta (Hübner, 1808), Tarachidia candefacta (Hübner, [1831]), Chrysodeixis chalcites (Esper, [1789]), Aedia leucomelas (Linnaeus, 1758), and Hecatera cappa (Hübner, [1809]). We also present and discuss the current status of the protected Lepidoptera species from the surroundings of the Romanian capital for the first time. Résumé. Ce travail représente une synthèse des connaissances actuelles concernant la faune de lépidoptères de Bucarest et de ses zones limitrophes sur un rayon de 50 km autour de la capitale de la Roumanie.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide Des Especes Et Milieux Determinants En Region
    DREAL CENTRE Document actualisé le 17/01/2012 Actualisation de l’inventaire régional des ZONES NATURELLES D’INTERET ECOLOGIQUE, FAUNISTIQUE ET FLORISTIQUE -ZNIEFF- GUIDE DES ESPECES ET MILIEUX DETERMINANTS EN REGION CENTRE Date de première validation par le CSRPN : 8 janvier 2003 SOMMAIRE LES HABITATS 4 LES ODONATES 53 LES VEGETAUX SUPERIEURS 12 LES ORTHOPTERES 55 DICOTYLEDONES 13 MONOCOTYLEDONES 23 LES HYMENOPTERES 57 LES LEPIDOPTERES 58 LES PTERIDOPHYTES 28 LES COLEOPTERES 61 LES BRYOPHYTES 30 LES EPHEMEROPTERES 66 LES CHAMPIGNONS 37 LES PLECOPTERES 68 LES MAMMIFERES (CHIROPTERES NON COMPRIS) 42 LES AUTRES INSECTES 69 LES CHIROPTERES 43 LES CRUSTACES 70 LES OISEAUX 47 LES MOLLUSQUES 71 LES REPTILES ET LES AMPHIBIENS 51 LES POISSONS 52 LISTE (NON EXHAUSTIVE) DES PERSONNES AYANT CONTRIBUE A LA REALISATION SCIENTIFIQUE ET TECHNIQUE DE CE DOCUMENT 75 2 HHAABBIITTAATTSS DDEETTEERRMMIINNAANNTTSS Rappel : par milieu déterminant, on entend « tout habitat naturel ou semi-naturel qui motive directement l’intérêt de la zone dans laquelle il se situe en raison de sa valeur propre. Cette dernière peut résulter de la rareté de l’habitat (surfaces concernées mais également nombre de sites), de sa spécificité à l’échelle de la région (situation d’isolat, limite d’aire de répartition, endémisme, etc.), de son degré de menace dans la région, des cortèges d’espèces qui le constituent et des fonctionnements écologiques qui le sous- tendent. » (Définition validée par le CSRPN en octobre 2006) 3 Liste des habitats déterminants de la région Centre Rappel : par milieu déterminant, on entend « tout habitat naturel ou semi-naturel qui motive directement l’intérêt de la zone dans laquelle il se situe en raison de sa valeur propre.
    [Show full text]
  • Reading Naturalist.Qxd
    The Reading Naturalist No. 69 Published by the Reading and District Natural History Society Report for 2016 (Published 2017) Price to Non-Members £5.00 T H E R E A D I N G N A T U R A L I S T No 69 for the year 2016 The Journal of the Reading and District Natural History Society President Mrs Jan Haseler Honorary General Secretary Mr Rob Stallard Honorary Editor Mr Ken White, Yonder Cottage, Ashford Hill, Reading, RG19 8AX Honorary Recorders Botany: Dr Ren ée Grayer, 16 Harcourt Drive, Earley, Reading, RG6 5TJ Fungi: Position Vacant Lichens: Position Vacant Lepidoptera: Mr Norman Hall, 44 Harcourt Drive, Earley, Reading, RG6 5TJ Entomology & other Invertebrates: Position Vacant Vertebrates: Mr Tony Rayner, The Red Cow, 46 Wallingford Road, Cholsey, Wallingford, OX10 9LB CONTENTS Presidential Musings Jan Haseler 1 Membership Norman Hall, Ian Duddle 2 Members’ Observations Julia Cooper, Rob Stallard 2 Excursions 2016 Renée Grayer, Jan Haseler 6 Sean O’Leary, Peter Cuss Ailsa Claybourn, Norman Hall Ken White, Sarah White Mid-week Walks 2016 Jan Haseler, Renée Grayer 17 Jerry Welsh, Rob Stallard Indoor Meetings 2016 Renée Grayer, Rob Stallard 21 Winning photographs and photographs from outings Members 33 Christmas Party and Photographic Competition Laurie Haseler 40 Presidential Address Jan Haseler 41 Theale Nightingle & Warbler Survey 2016 Richard Crawford 45 Saving our Swifts Colin Wilson 47 Recorder’s Report for Botany 2016 Renée Grayer 48 Recorder’s Report for Lepidoptera 2016 Norman Hall 52 Recorder’s Report for Vertebrates 2016 Tony Rayner 63 The Weather in Reading during 2016 Roger Brugge 70 Thanks go to all the contributors for their efforts in meeting the deadlines whilst carrying on with busy lives.
    [Show full text]
  • Contribution to the Study of the Noctuidae of Čelarevo (Serbia)
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by University of Belgrade - Faculty of Biology: Open Journal Systems Acta entomologicaserbica, 2017 , 22 : 41 -89 UDC 595.786(497 .113) DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.1133651 CONTRIBUTION TO THE STUDY OF THE NOCTUIDAE OF ČELAREVO (SERBIA) DRAGAN VAJGAND Agroprotekt doo, Nikole Pašića 9, 25000 Sombor, Serbia E mail: [email protected]; web: www.agroupozorenje.rs Abstract Moths were collected in Čelarevo (UTM CR81) from 2008 to 2014 using a light trap, type RO Agrobecej, with a 250W mercury lamp. A total of 234000 specimens were collected, of which 223226 are identified at species level (292 species in all). The present paper provides data relating to 28921 specimens of 137 Noctuidae species. The faunistically most important findings are as follows: Diachrysia nadeja, Diachrysia zosimi, Diachrysia chryson, Acontia candefacta, Acronicta aceris, A. strigosa, Simyra albovenosa, Cucullia fraudatrix, Amphipyra livida, Meganephria bimaculosa, Heliothis nubigera, Charanyca ferruginea, Calamia tridens, Helotropha leucostigma, Gortyna borelii lunata, Hydraecia micacea, Archanara dissoluta, Apamea anceps, Mesogona oxalina, Panolis flammea, Saragossa porosa kenderesiensis, Hadena irregularis, Senta flammea, Agrotis puta, A. vestigialis, Cerastis rubricosa. KEY WORDS : Noctuidae; fauna; porosa Introduction Previous data on the Lepidoptera of Čelarevo included 189 species (Vajgand et al. , 2009, 2010a, 2010b, 2010c, 2010d, 2012a, 2012b, 2016, Stojanović et al., 2017). From this region, data on moths are available for Fruška Gora (Stojanović, 2012), Novi Sad (Kereši & Almaši, 2009) and Sombor (Vajgand1988, Vajgand, 1995a, Vajgand, 1995b, Vajgand 1996, Vajgand 1999, Vajgand 2001, Vajgand 2003, Stojanović & Vajgand 2007, Stojanović et al. 2006, Vajgand 2009, Vajgand 2010a, Vajgand 2010c, Vajgand 2011, Vajgand 2012a).
    [Show full text]
  • Revizija Biodiverzitete V Krajinskem Parku Ljubljansko Barje« S Priporočili Za Varstvo Biodiverzitete Kopenskih, Negozdnih Okolij Krajinskega Parka Ljubljansko Barje
    2020 Pilotna akcija “Revizija biodiverzitete v Krajinskem parku Ljubljansko barje” Poročilo o Pilotni akciji “Revizija biodiverzitete v Krajinskem parku Ljubljansko barje« s priporočili za varstvo biodiverzitete kopenskih, negozdnih okolij Krajinskega parka Ljubljansko barje Verzija 1.3 Ljubljana, december 2020 PODATKI O PROJEKTU IN POROČILU Naslov projekta: From Biodiversity Data to Decisions: enhancing natural value through improved regional development policies / Od podatkov o biodiverziteti do odločanja: izboljšanje varovanja naravnih vrednot s pomočjo izboljšanih regionalnih razvojnih politik Akronim: BID-REX Številka projekta: PGI601505 Program: Evropsko teritorialno medregionalno sodelovanje 2014–2020 (Interreg Evropa – »Okolje in učinkovitost rabe virov«) Trajanje projekta: 1.4.2016 - 31.3.2021 Upravičeni stroški projekta: 1,606,415.00 EUR Nosilec projekta: Forest Sciences Centre of Catalonia, Španija Nosilec poročila: Nacionalni inštitut za biologijo, Večna pot 111, 1000 Ljubljana Naslov poročila: Poročilo o Pilotni akciji “Revizija biodiverzitete v Krajinskem parku Ljubljansko barje« s priporočili za varstvo biodiverzitete kopenskih, negozdnih okolij Krajinskega parka Ljubljansko barje Poročilo pripravili: Dr. Nataša Mori, univ. dipl. biol., Dr. Al Vrezec, univ. dipl. biol., Dr. Davorin Tome, univ. dipl. biol., Urška Ratajc, mag. ekol. biod. (Nacionalni inštitut za biologijo) Priprava in urejanje podatkov: Ali Šalamun, univ. dipl. biol. (Center za kartografijo favne in flore) Fotografije: Dare Fekonja (PMS), Davorin Tome (NIB),
    [Show full text]