CBC Newsletter Autumn 2020
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Forestry Department Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Forestry Department Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Forest Health & Biosecurity Working Papers OVERVIEW OF FOREST PESTS ROMANIA January 2007 Forest Resources Development Service Working Paper FBS/28E Forest Management Division FAO, Rome, Italy Forestry Department DISCLAIMER The aim of this document is to give an overview of the forest pest1 situation in Romania. It is not intended to be a comprehensive review. The designations employed and the presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. © FAO 2007 1 Pest: Any species, strain or biotype of plant, animal or pathogenic agent injurious to plants or plant products (FAO, 2004). Overview of forest pests - Romania TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction..................................................................................................................... 1 Forest pests and diseases................................................................................................. 1 Naturally regenerating forests..................................................................................... 1 Insects ..................................................................................................................... 1 Diseases................................................................................................................ -
Fauna Lepidopterologica Volgo-Uralensis" 150 Years Later: Changes and Additions
©Ges. zur Förderung d. Erforschung von Insektenwanderungen e.V. München, download unter www.zobodat.at Atalanta (August 2000) 31 (1/2):327-367< Würzburg, ISSN 0171-0079 "Fauna lepidopterologica Volgo-Uralensis" 150 years later: changes and additions. Part 5. Noctuidae (Insecto, Lepidoptera) by Vasily V. A n ik in , Sergey A. Sachkov , Va d im V. Z o lo t u h in & A n drey V. Sv ir id o v received 24.II.2000 Summary: 630 species of the Noctuidae are listed for the modern Volgo-Ural fauna. 2 species [Mesapamea hedeni Graeser and Amphidrina amurensis Staudinger ) are noted from Europe for the first time and one more— Nycteola siculana Fuchs —from Russia. 3 species ( Catocala optata Godart , Helicoverpa obsoleta Fabricius , Pseudohadena minuta Pungeler ) are deleted from the list. Supposedly they were either erroneously determinated or incorrect noted from the region under consideration since Eversmann 's work. 289 species are recorded from the re gion in addition to Eversmann 's list. This paper is the fifth in a series of publications1 dealing with the composition of the pres ent-day fauna of noctuid-moths in the Middle Volga and the south-western Cisurals. This re gion comprises the administrative divisions of the Astrakhan, Volgograd, Saratov, Samara, Uljanovsk, Orenburg, Uralsk and Atyraus (= Gurjev) Districts, together with Tataria and Bash kiria. As was accepted in the first part of this series, only material reliably labelled, and cover ing the last 20 years was used for this study. The main collections are those of the authors: V. A n i k i n (Saratov and Volgograd Districts), S. -
The Maria Curie-Skłodowska University Botanical Garden in Lublin As a Refuge of the Moths (Lepidoptera: Heterocera) Within the City
Acta Biologica 23/2016 | www.wnus.edu.pl/ab | DOI: 10.18276/ab.2016.23-02 | strony 15–34 The Maria Curie-Skłodowska University Botanical Garden in Lublin as a refuge of the moths (Lepidoptera: Heterocera) within the city Łukasz Dawidowicz,1 Halina Kucharczyk2 Department of Zoology, Maria Curie-Skłodowska University, Akademicka 19, 20-033 Lublin, Poland 1 e-mail: [email protected] 2 e-mail: [email protected] Keywords biodiversity, urban fauna, faunistics, city, species composition, rare species, conservation Abstract In 2012 and 2013, 418 species of moths at total were recorded in the Botanical Garden of the Maria Curie-Skłodowska University in Lublin. The list comprises 116 species of Noctuidae (26.4% of the Polish fauna), 116 species of Geometridae (28.4% of the Polish fauna) and 63 species of other Macrolepidoptera representatives (27.9% of the Polish fauna). The remaining 123 species were represented by Microlepidoptera. Nearly 10% of the species were associated with wetland habitats, what constitutes a surprisingly large proportion in such an urbanised area. Comparing the obtained data with previous studies concerning Polish urban fauna of Lepidoptera, the moths assemblages in the Botanical Garden were the most similar to the one from the Natolin Forest Reserve which protects the legacy of Mazovian forests. Several recorded moths appertain to locally and rarely encountered species, as Stegania cararia, Melanthia procellata, Pasiphila chloerata, Eupithecia haworthiata, Horisme corticata, Xylomoia graminea, Polychrysia moneta. In the light of the conducted studies, the Botanical Garden in Lublin stands out as quite high biodiversity and can be regarded as a refuge for moths within the urban limits of Lublin. -
Newsletter 82 Page 1 of 14 Ground-Breaking Format, Incorporating the Gathering and Disseminating of Records and Information About the Moths of the County
Norfolk Moth Survey c/o Natural History Dept., Castle Museum, Norwich, NR1 3JU Newsletter No.82 November 2012 INTRODUCTION It has been, as they say, a funny old year. Anyone hoping for an upturn in mothing fortunes following the topsy-turvy summer of 2011 was likely to have been disappointed. In fact, I don’t think I can recall any other year since NMS started in 1985, when so many of our planned field meetings have succumbed to adverse weather conditions. Lynford was postponed, Brettenham was a non-event, and our joint meeting with the Suffolk Moth Group for National Moth Night was cancelled. One suggestion resulting from all this is that in future we should encourage everyone to check information on the website on the day of the event if conditions are likely to be unfavourable. Hopefully that may prevent un-necessary journeys from being undertaken. Having said all that, the remaining field trips were fairly successful, and reports on them are included in this newsletter. As always, we are grateful to all of you who have supported these events in any way. Given the circumstances, it is hardly surprising that migrant species were also relatively sparse in appearance this year. Dave Hipperson has compiled the usual list of records received so far. If you have any outstanding migrant records, do please send them in as an additional list will be included in the newsletter next spring. One of the more exciting migrants that did turn up was a new county record in the form of the pyrale Sclerocona acutellus, the so-called Thatch Pearl. -
Micro-Moth Grading Guidelines (Scotland) Abhnumber Code
Micro-moth Grading Guidelines (Scotland) Scottish Adult Mine Case ABHNumber Code Species Vernacular List Grade Grade Grade Comment 1.001 1 Micropterix tunbergella 1 1.002 2 Micropterix mansuetella Yes 1 1.003 3 Micropterix aureatella Yes 1 1.004 4 Micropterix aruncella Yes 2 1.005 5 Micropterix calthella Yes 2 2.001 6 Dyseriocrania subpurpurella Yes 2 A Confusion with fly mines 2.002 7 Paracrania chrysolepidella 3 A 2.003 8 Eriocrania unimaculella Yes 2 R Easier if larva present 2.004 9 Eriocrania sparrmannella Yes 2 A 2.005 10 Eriocrania salopiella Yes 2 R Easier if larva present 2.006 11 Eriocrania cicatricella Yes 4 R Easier if larva present 2.007 13 Eriocrania semipurpurella Yes 4 R Easier if larva present 2.008 12 Eriocrania sangii Yes 4 R Easier if larva present 4.001 118 Enteucha acetosae 0 A 4.002 116 Stigmella lapponica 0 L 4.003 117 Stigmella confusella 0 L 4.004 90 Stigmella tiliae 0 A 4.005 110 Stigmella betulicola 0 L 4.006 113 Stigmella sakhalinella 0 L 4.007 112 Stigmella luteella 0 L 4.008 114 Stigmella glutinosae 0 L Examination of larva essential 4.009 115 Stigmella alnetella 0 L Examination of larva essential 4.010 111 Stigmella microtheriella Yes 0 L 4.011 109 Stigmella prunetorum 0 L 4.012 102 Stigmella aceris 0 A 4.013 97 Stigmella malella Apple Pigmy 0 L 4.014 98 Stigmella catharticella 0 A 4.015 92 Stigmella anomalella Rose Leaf Miner 0 L 4.016 94 Stigmella spinosissimae 0 R 4.017 93 Stigmella centifoliella 0 R 4.018 80 Stigmella ulmivora 0 L Exit-hole must be shown or larval colour 4.019 95 Stigmella viscerella -
The Barbastelle in Bovey Valley Woods
The Barbastelle in Bovey Valley Woods A report prepared for The Woodland Trust The Barbastelle in Bovey Valley Woods Andrew Carr, Dr Matt Zeale & Professor Gareth Jones School of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Life Sciences Building, 24 Tyndall Avenue, Bristol, BS8 1TQ Report prepared for The Woodland Trust October 2016 Acknowledgements Thanks to: Dave Rickwood of the Woodland Trust for his central role and continued support throughout this project; Dr Andrew Weatherall of the University of Cumbria; Simon Lee of Natural England and James Mason of the Woodland Trust for helpful advice; Dr Beth Clare of Queen Mary University of London for support with molecular work; the many Woodland Trust volunteers and assistants that provided their time to the project. We would particularly like to thank Tom ‘the tracker’ Williams and Mike ‘the trapper’ Treble for dedicating so much of their time. We thank the Woodland Trust, Natural England and the Heritage Lottery Fund for funding this research. We also appreciate assistance from the local landowners who provided access to land. i Contents Acknowledgements i Contents ii List of figures and tables iii 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Background 1 1.2 The Barbastelle in Bovey Valley Woods 2 1.3 Objectives 2 2 Methods 2 2.1 Study area 2 2.2 Bat capture, tagging and radio-tracking 3 2.3 Habitat mapping 4 2.4 Analysis of roost preferences 5 2.5 Analysis of ranges and foraging areas 7 2.6 Analysis of diet 7 3 Results 8 3.1 Capture data 8 3.2 Roost selection and preferences 9 3.3 Ranging and foraging 14 3.4 Diet 17 4 Discussion 21 4.1 Roost use 21 4.2 Ranging behaviour 24 4.3 Diet 25 5 Conclusion 26 References 27 Appendix 1 Summary table of all bat captures 30 Appendix 2 Comparison of individual B. -
Aethes Fortsat, Cochylidia, Cochylis Mv. (4326-4365) Aethes Cnicana (Wstw.)
Cochylini del 3 Aethes fortsat, Cochylidia, Cochylis mv. (4326-4365) Aethes cnicana (Wstw.) 13-18 mm. Imago flyver om aftenen omkring foderplanten og kommer fint til lys i juni juli. Længere mod syd i to generationer. Der er en del variation. Båndet kan være næsten jævnt bredt i hele længden eller – oftere - noget knudret, men dog sammenhængende. Aethes cnicana (Wstw.) Larven lever i frø, rødder og stængler af forskellige tidsler, i Norden først og fremmest Tidsel og Bladhovedtidsel (Cirsium, Carduus). Den overvintrer og forpupper sig i stængel/rod om foråret. Udbredt og almindelig i hele det nordlige og centrale Europa. Aethes cnicana & rubigana Aethes cnicana (tv.) er lysere, mere roligt tegnet og midtbåndet er næsten udelt. Aethes rubigana (th.) har delt midtbånd og den nederste del ender med et rundt hoved, der tydeligt bøjer udad mod apex. Midt- båndet er også tydeligt bre- dere og der er et tydeligt, bredt bånd af lidt mørkere skæl længere ude på vingen. Aethes rubigana (Tr.) 15-19 mm. Imago flyver i aftentimerne omkring foderplanterne i juli-august og kommer gerne til lys. Længere mod syd er der også en generation i maj-juni. Også hos denne art er der en del variation, men båndet er altid afbrudt. Aethes rubigana (Tr.) Larven lever i september-oktober i blomsterhovederne af Burre (Actium) og overvintrer i stængel/rodstok. Sommergenerationen kan leve også i bladene. Aethes rubigana (Tr.) Arten kan også være meget spraglet og mørkere i yderfeltet som det viste eksemplar. Det er oftest hunner. Aethes rubigana (Tr.) Arten er udbredt øst for israndslinjen i Danmark og lokalt almindelig. -
F:\REJ\15-4\427-432 (Miller Et Al).Pmd
Russian Entomol. J. 15(4): 427–432 © RUSSIAN ENTOMOLOGICAL JOURNAL, 2006 DNA-based identification of Lepidoptera larvae and plant meals from their gut contents Îñíîâàííîå íà ÄÍÊ îïðåäåëåíèå ãóñåíèö Lepidoptera è ðàñòèòåëüíîé ïèùè èç èõ êèøå÷íèêà Michael A. Miller1, Günter C. Müller2, Vasiliy D. Kravchenko3, Amy Junnila4, Kim K. Vernon5, Carney D. Matheson6 & Axel Hausmann1 Ìèõàýëü À. Ìèëëåð1, Ãþíòåð Ê. Ìþëëåð2, Âàñèëèé Ä. Êðàâ÷åíêî3, Ýéìè Äæàííèëà4, Êèì Ê. Âåðíîí5, Êýðíè Ä. Ìàòåñîí6 è Àêñåëü Õàóñìàíí1 1 Zoologische Staatssammlung München, AG DNA-TAX, Münchhausenstr. 21, D-81247 München, Germany (corresponding author, e-mail: [email protected]); 2 Department of Parasitology, The Hebrew University, Hadassah Medical School, P.O. Box 12272, Ein Kerem, Jerusalem 91120 Israel; 3 Department of Zoology, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978 Israel; 4 Department of Parasitology, McGill University, Macdonald College, 21,111 Lakeshore Rd., Sainte-Anne-de Bellevue, Montreal West, H9X 3V9 Quebec, Canada; 5 Department of Zoology, University of Queensland, Brisbane QLD 4072 Australia; 6 Paleo-DNA Laboratory, Lakehead University, 1294 Balmoral St, Thunder Bay, P7B 5Z5 Ontario, Canada. 1 Государственный зоологический музей Мюнхена, AG DNA-TAX, Мюнгаузен Штрассе 21, D-81247 Мюнхен, Германия (контактный адрес, e-mail: [email protected]); 2 Кафедра паразитологии, Еврейский Университет, Медицинская Школа Хадассах, почтовый ящик 12272, Эйн Керем, Иерусалим 91120, Израиль; 3 Кафедра зоологии, Университет Тель-Авива, Тель-Авив 69978, Израиль; 4 Кафедра паразитологии, Университет МакГилла, МакДональд Колледж, 21, 111 Лайкшоэ Роуд, Св. Анна де Bellevue, Западный Монраель, H9X 3V9 Квебек, Канада; 5 Кафедра зоологии, Университет Квинсленда, Брисбен QLD 4072, Австралия; 6 Лаборатория палео-ДНК, Университет Лайкхеда, 1294 Балморал Стрит, Тундер Бэй, P7B 5Z5 Онтарио, Канада. -
5.7 MB Perennial Flower Strips – a Tool for Improving Pest Control in Fruit
Technical guide 2018 | No. 1096 Functional agrobiodiversity Perennial flower strips – a tool for improving pest control in fruit orchards Why sowing flower strips in orchards? Orchards are interesting habitats for biodiversity • They provide natural enemies with shelter and due to their perennial character and their diversi- food (pollen, nectar, alternative preys) that allow fied structure. They are potentially attractive for them to maintain their populations within the both pollinators and pests’ natural enemies. Diver- orchard and to produce more offspring. sifying orchards with non-crop vegetation such as • The flower strips’ proximity to the crop makes it flower strips can provide additional opportunities easier for the predators and parasitoids to reach to maintain and develop these populations and the pests and thus increase biological pest control, thus optimize ecosystem services. especially for little, mobile species. • Undisturbed ground zones in flower strips pro- Advantages of sown flower strips: mote beneficial arthropods that live on the soil • Flower strips in drive alleys enhance the surface such as ground beetles and spiders that complexi ty of the orchard ecosystem, which is feed on pest larvae. attractive to many species of predators, parasi- toids and pollinators. A diversified and complex ecosystem provides better biological pest control. Interaction between natural enemies promoted by flower strips and phytophagous pests Ladybird beetles Hoveries Bats Parasitic wasps Birds N s a e t i Predatory bugs u r m a e l n s e e t n s l e P e a m r Moths u i t e s a Ladybird larvae Lacewing larvae N Beetles Aphids Psylla Spiders Rove beetles Ground beetles Earwigs Pollen and nectar Alternative insect hosts Pest caterpillars and pupae Throughout the year, sown flower strips maintain a diverse population of natural enemies close to the fruit trees. -
Végétations Amphibies
Végétations amphibies amphibies Végétations 120 GUIDE DES VÉGÉTATIONS DES ZONES HUMIDES DE NORMANDIE ORIENTALE GUIDE DES VÉGÉTATIONS DES ZONES HUMIDES DE NORMANDIE ORIENTALE 121 Végétations annuelles des vases exondées Bidentetea tripartitae W. Levy W. - - A. Dardillac - A. Dardillac - Bidens cernua Bidens Oxybasis rubra Bidens tripartita A. Dardillac - J. Buchet J. - - Bidentetea tripartitae Oxybasis glauca glauca Oxybasis J. Buchet Persicaria maculosa - Localisation (?) - B. Toussaint Rumex maritimus Photo : J. Buchet DESCRIPTION DE LA CLASSE substrat (humidité, richesse), de la période d’exondation milieux les plus asséchés et les plus perturbés, on peut fragmentaires et pauvres en espèces, généralement peu (et des fluctuations des niveaux d’eau), des conditions également noter des espèces rudérales des Sisymbrietea étendues et souvent réduites à des linéaires le long des Végétations pionnières herbacées dominées par des climatiques saisonnières (végétation à éclipses) et officinalis ou des Stellarietea mediae (principalement des cours d’eau ou en périphérie des pièces d’eau, excepté plantes annuelles se développant sur des sols riches en locales, et des espèces et associations concernées. espèces de la famille des Amaranthacées (Amaranthus dans quelques zones particulières où ces communautés éléments nutritifs (azote notamment) et qui s’exondent Ces végétations étant pionnières et essentiellement div. sp., Chenopodium div. sp. Oxybasis div. sp., Lypandra sont plus étendues. progressivement. Ces communautés se développent composées de plantes annuelles, elles sont très sensibles polysperma). Cette classe de végétation est particulièrement bien de l’été jusqu’à l’automne sur des substrats plus ou à la concurrence, en particulier par les grands hélophytes. représentée dans les étangs de la vallée de l’Avre ainsi moins vaseux restant toujours humides, au moins en que dans de nombreuses mares de la plaine du Neubourg profondeur. -
A Guide to Common Caterpillars
A Guide to Common Caterpillars All photographs © BNA A caterpillar (or larvae) are words used to describe the early stages in the lifecycle of moths or butterflies. Some species are easier than others to identify because of distinctive colours or because they are very hairy however there are a few very good field guides available to help you identify them. We are all used to seeing butterflies in our gardens, but moths belong to the same family – Lepidoptera with most of them flying at night. They are attracted to nectar in the same way as butterflies and therefore are just as important pollinators as butterflies are. There are four stages in the life cycle, egg – caterpillar – pupa – adult; and the metamorphosis which takes place is when it is in the pupa stage. Some insects grow from larvae to adult by shedding skin to accommodate the growing body. Whereas caterpillars form a case (called a pupa) around themselves where the transformation takes place. Inside this tough case the caterpillar becomes a squidgy mass almost like a thick soup, and reforms into a butterfly or moth shape. Some will over-winter as a pupa and emerge as an adult timed to coincide when the prefered food plants are available. The adult will break through the outer case and climb up a blade of grass or similar and wait for its wings to dry out. Then, the whole process begins again. Some moths fly by day like the Burnet moths – a black moth with either five or six bright red dots on each wing. -
January Review of Butterfly, Moth and Other Natural History Sightings 2019
Review of butterfly, moth and other natural history sightings 2019 January January started dry and settled but mostly cloudy with high pressure dominant, and it remained generally dry and often mild during the first half of the month. The second half became markedly cooler with overnight frosts and the last week saw a little precipitation, some which was occasionally wintry. With the mild weather continuing from December 2018 there were a small number of migrant moths noted in January, comprising a Dark Sword-grass at Seabrook on the 5th, a Silver Y there on the 13th and 2 Plutella xylostella (Diamond-back Moths) there on the 15th, whilst a very unseasonal Dark Arches at Hythe on the 4th may have been of immigrant origin. Dark Sword-grass at Seabrook (Paul Howe) Dark Arches at Hythe (Ian Roberts) More typical species involved Epiphyas postvittana (Light Brown Apple Moth), Satellite, Mottled Umber, Winter Moth, Chestnut, Spring Usher and Early Moth. Early Moth at Seabrook (Paul Howe) Spring Usher at Seabrook (Paul Howe) The only butterfly noted was a Red Admiral at Nickolls Quarry on the 1st but the mild weather encouraged single Buff-tailed Bumblebees to appear at Seabrook on the 7th and Mill Point on the 8th, whilst a Minotaur Beetle was attracted to light at Seabrook on the 6th. A Common Seal and two Grey Seals were noted regularly off Folkestone, whilst at Hare was seen near Botolph’s Bridge on the 1st and a Mink was noted there on the 17th. February After a cold start to the month it was generally mild from the 5th onwards.