sign in sign up
<<
Home , Ilya Repin, Ivan Aivazovsky, Ivan Kramskoi, Konstantin Makovsky, May Night, Peredvizhniki

FROM WITH LOVE By Melville Holmes In 1863, the same year that disaffection with the Paris Salon reached such a pitch that Napoleon III felt obliged to mount the Salon des Refusés, concurrent with the offcial Salon, a minor insurrection took place in the Imperial Academy in St. Petersburg, but one that would go down in the annals of as a turning point and a milestone in the history of Russian art. A group of art students at the Academy, largely led by Kramskoi, refused to take part in a competition for a gold medal, which included the prize of a scholarship to study abroad, in Paris or . The reason given had to do with certain rules of the contest and wanting the freedom to select one’s own subject matter. This was the frst time the students stood up to the authorities, though the real upshot was rather indefnite. Eight of the rebels would go on to become offcially acknowledged Academicians, including Kramskoi. In fact, the Russian Academy seems largely to have been much more kindly and encouraging to gifted artists Vasili Pukirev (1832-1890) From with fresh ideas than their Parisian The Unequal Marriage 1862 counterparts. oil on canvas 68.5 х 54” One example is Vasili Pukirev (1832- , 1890), best known for The Unequal The fgure on the far right is thought to be Pukirev. Marriage. There were lots of scenes of daily, often peasant life (“genre” ), being done at the time but they weren’t wandering or traveling infuential critic this representation of a marriage between artists. The group was founded as a (1824-1906) was an ardent proponent a leering old man of station and a young cooperative venture in order for members of the idea that Russian artists should Russia woman who was less than thrilled at to exhibit their works apart from the eschew European modes and infuences the match broke new ground for its auspices of the Academy, and one of in favor of specifcally Russian ones. refections on some unhappy results their main intentions was to bring their (He also played a major role as advisor WITH LOVE of social conventions. The artist was work to the awareness of audiences in and encourager to the Russian Five Some Highlights of Russian from the Golden Age awarded an Honorary Professorship by provincial cities, not just St. Petersburg composers.) In his mind the “Revolt the Academy for his efforts. and Moscow. In other words, the of the Fourteen” was a “protest against artists didn’t travel, their works did. the classical subjects…in the brave n the last decades of the nineteenth Described as charismatic, vocal and a I exotic Asiatic melodies. The music of painter , who believed These artists were not ideologically resolution of the tiny handful of poor, century a group of Russian composers, prolifc writer, Kramskoi was also an Borodin, Mussorgsky, and Rimsky- that “The Russian [artist] should fnally or stylistically bound together and the weak youngsters.” They simply could not known as The Mighty Five1 (or just The organizer of artist’s collaboratives, most Korsakov, especially, is well known in stand on his own feet…It’s time to think endeavor was basically economically bear to succumb to the ludicrous ways of Five), banded together with the goal notably The Company of Traveling Art America. A similar motivation existed about the creation of our own Russian motivated. the school, to the silly choice of good- of creating a strictly and distinctively Exhibitions, or the .2 Usual among some Russian artists of the school…Our art dwells in slavery to for-nothing subjects. They protested Russian musical style, based on English translations—the Itinerants or period, yet their names are scarcely the Academy, which is itself a slave of Nevertheless, a persistent myth grew against the old for the sake of the new. traditional folk songs and often with the Wanderers—are misleading because known here. Among these was the Western art.” up around them. The prominent and

32 ART CHOWDER MAGAZINE January | February 2018 33 FROM RUSSIA WITH LOVE By Melville Holmes Ivan Nikolayevich Kramskoi (1837- 1887) Ivan Nikolayevich Kramskoi (1837-1887) The Mermaids 1871 oil on canvas 34.65 x 52” Tretyakov Gallery, Moscow

Nikolai Rimsky-Korsakov composed an based on the same story by Gogol called May Night between 1878 and 1879. While it never became part of the standard operatic repertoire in the West, the beautiful overture and some arias, indeed the entire opera, can be found online.

According to scholar Evgeny Steiner,3 it was Stasov, the ardent Russophile, who was mainly responsible for a slant on the nature of the “revolt” and the motivations of the group of Itinerant artists, notably Kramskoi and great realist painter . This ideological slant would become the conventional wisdom of post-Revolution Soviet ideology— the notions that these later nineteenth century Russian artists represented a fundamentally democratic cause and social responsibility, with a condemnation of the Tsarist regime. t the Second Exhibition, also held at Ivan Nikolayevich Kramskoi (1837-1887) But these artists weren’t revolutionaries looking to change the existing A Christ in the Wilderness the Academy the following year, Kramskoi 1872 political and social order. Nor were they in a hurry to fully break from the oil on canvas showed a non-Russian subject with his Academy. They worked cooperatively with it when it suited them. Curiously, 72.44 х 84.25” powerful Realist composition of Christ in Tretyakov Gallery, Moscow the frst several exhibitions of the so-called Itinerants were held on the the Desert, derived from the story of the premises of the Academy in St. Petersburg! Temptation of Jesus in the wilderness. According to the texts, Jesus was led to In the First Traveling Exhibition of 1871, Kramskoi exhibited his Rusalki, the desert after his baptism to fast for forty days and be tested by the devil. With translated Mermaids. The subject derived from a story called “May Night” profound psychological penetration, the artist conveys a sense that the battle of by Ukrainian-born dramatist (1809-1852), whom the artist Ivan Nikolayevich Kramskoi (1837-1887) Jesus with the fesh and the devil was an internal one. Portrait of Maria Fyodorovna admired. In Slavic mythology and folklore, the rusalki were a sort of water 1881 Both of these paintings were purchased by successful Moscow merchant Pavel nymph, often identifed with the spirits of drowned maidens who haunt oil on canvas 42.9 x 29.1” Tretyakov, one of the major collectors of Russian art at the time. One of the major Ivan Nikolayevich Kramskoi (1837-1887) Hermitage , St. Petersburg ponds and waterways. The does not illustrate any particular incident Moonlit Night 1880 problems facing Russian artists was the fact that there really were no art dealers in the story but instead, intent on capturing the effects of moonlight on the Maria Feodorovna (1847-1928), born Princess Dagmar oil on canvas and commercial galleries, such as began to emerge in Paris in the later 1800s. As it landscape with its woeful company, creates a poetically haunting, eerie dimensions unavailable of Denmark, was Empress of Russia, the wife of Tsar Tretyakov Gallery, Moscow Alexander III, and the mother of Tsar Nicholas II. turned out, Kramskoi largely supported himself with portraiture. mood.

34 ART CHOWDER MAGAZINE January | February 2018 35 Ilya Repin (1844-1930)

Younger than Kramskoi—for a time his student until he entered the Academy, an indictment of working conditions and a sometime member of the Itinerants—Ilya Repin has been called “Russia’s under Tsarist rule, it received glowing ,” and the frst Russian artist to have found notoriety in the West while praise in offcial quarters and, while painting Russian themes. Repin was reportedly Stalin’s favorite artist and was held Tretyakov tried to buy it, the picture was

by the Soviets to be a precursor and catalyst for , the offcially acquired by a son of Tsar Alexander II, Ilya Repin (1844-1930) his depiction of a now bygone supported style of the USSR. Grand Duke Vladimir Alexandrovich, T The Zaporozhye Replying to the Sultan who immediately sent it to be shown world falls somewhat into the same 1878-1891 The painting that frst brought Repin acclaim was his Barge Haulers on the in , and it was later hung in his category as the paintings of French oil on canvas (1870-1873). Begun while he was a student, the artist had frst seen barge haulers palace. peasant life by Jules Breton and 85.4 x 142.1” while out on holiday and was so taken by the sight that, in part through help from others, which were also starting to , St. Petersburg the Academy, he traveled to the Volga River with some companions, where he found The style of Repin has been called fade away. But this is of a Ukrainian ethnic group that some real barge haulers to use in his masterpiece. A comparison of Repin’s painting “Critical Realism,” an example of which marked by extreme class distinctions had been giving the Ottoman Turks with the utterly matter-of-fact Realism of ’s Stone Breakers reveals is his Easter Procession in the District that the artist has taken pains to point trouble in battle. Sultan Mehmed IV a marked difference; the latter fgures are essentially soulless, whereas each of the of . out. had demanded that the Cossacks stop barge haulers is highly individualized. Although the painting has been taken as Repin was also a masterful portrait their antics and submit to Ottoman artist, painting many members of rule, identifying himself with words the intelligentsia of the day. His like, “the Sultan; son of Muhammad; Ilya Repin (1844-1930) brother of the sun and moon; grandson Barge Haulers on the Volga consummate mastery of character and viceroy of God; etc.” it was a 1870-1873 and expression can be seen in his kind of high sounding cease-and- oil on canvas The Zaporozhye Cossacks Replying 51.8 x 110.6” to the Sultan (1880-1891), a subject desist letter. The fercely independent Russian Museum, St. Petersburg drawn from the perhaps apocryphal Cossacks are portrayed in the process story set in 1676 that involved an of answering the Sultan with the most exchange of letters between the Sultan raunchy and insulting mimicry they Ilya Repin (1844-1930) of the and members could come up with. While there is no Easter Procession in the Region of Kursk solid evidence that the episode is true, 1880-1883 Ilya Repin (1844-1930) the rendering of the personalities in oil on canvas Barefoot 68 x 110” the group is brilliant. Tsar Alexander 1901 Tretyakov Gallery, Moscow III bought the huge canvas for an oil on canvas astronomically record sum. 81.5 x 21.74” Russian Museum, St. Petersburg 36 ART CHOWDER MAGAZINE January | February 2018 37 Nikolay Alekseyevich Kasatkin (1859-1930) ot all great Russian artists Nikolay Alekseyevich Kasatkin (1859- N 1930) were pushing the envelope. The Orphaned marine painter 1891 (1817-1900) was a thoroughgoing oil on canvas academician, whose style has 20 x 34.65” Russian Museum, St. Petersburg usually been termed Romantic, though perhaps bordering on Nikolay Alekseyevich Kasatkin (1859- Realism. The power and poetry 1930) of his seascapes arguably rank “Who?” 1897 him among the greatest maritime oil on canvas painters of all time. During his dimensions unavailable life he became one of the most Tretyakov Gallery, Moscow prominent artists of the century, not only in Russia but abroad. Nikolay Alekseyevich Kasatkin (1859- 1930) His many international honors Poor People Collecting Coal in an included prestigious awards from Abandoned Pit 1894 Poland, to the Ottoman Empire, Ivan Aivazovsky (1817-1900) oil on canvas and he was the frst Russian to Ivan Aivazovsky (1817-1900) The Ninth Wave 32.6 x 42.1” receive the French Legion of 1850 Russian Museum, St. Petersburg Honor. oil on canvas 87 x 130.71” Russian Museum, St. Petersburg (1839- 1915), a founding member of the Itinerants, was an academic historical painter whose subjects included representations of an idealized Russian past. It was stunning to see the very large Russian Bride’s Attire in San Francisco some 30 years ago, just after it was cleaned and brought out of storage. Beautifully painted, emotionally charged, and compositionally brilliant, the title seems inadequate. Here are depicted ages of woman and of man, from the little boy chewing The emotional contrast could scarcely Just as anyone can relate to the feelings know whose child this is and the on his cookie beside his mother be more strident when the foregoing is of the mother of the bride, clutching her woman’s evident pain. Kasatkin’s on the bottom left, to the groom compared with the painting by Nikolay handkerchief as she contemplates the was a stark form of realism, but his who can’t wait to see his bride, Kasatkin (1859-1930), entitled simply momentous family change about to take characters remain very much human but is told he’s not allowed in Who? A soldier has returned from his place, so is the viewer empathetically and emotionally sympathetic. The artist the chamber by some elder aunt, service to fnd himself in the company of drawn into a different kind of timeless would become one of the founders of while the dignifed, matronly his wife and her child by another man. pathos with the man who wants to Socialist Realism. Konstantin Makovsky (1839-1915) grandmother dresses the beautiful Konstantin Makovsky (1839-1915) The Russian Bride’s Attire bride’s raven hair. The picture 1889 exudes a kind of poetic mystery. oil on canvas 1 , César Cui, , , and Nikolai Rimsky-Korsakov 110 x 147” 2 There are pronunciation sites online where one can hear this.

Fine Arts of San Francisco 3 Evgeny Steiner. “Pursuing Independence: Kramskoi and the Peredvizhniki vs. the Academy of Arts” The Russian Review, Vol. 70, No. 2 (APRIL 2011), pp. 252-271.

38 ART CHOWDER MAGAZINE January | February 2018 39