Tree-Derived Stimuli Affecting Host-Selection Response of Larva and Adult Peach Twig Borers, Anarsia Lineatella (Zeller) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Tree-Derived Stimuli Affecting Host-Selection Response of Larva and Adult Peach Twig Borers, Anarsia Lineatella (Zeller) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) TREE-DERIVED STIMULI AFFECTING HOST-SELECTION RESPONSE OF LARVA AND ADULT PEACH TWIG BORERS, Anarsia lineatella (ZELLER) (LEPIDOPTERA: GELECHIIDAE) Mark Christopher Sidney B.Sc, B.Ed, Simon Fraser University, 1999, 2004 THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQmEMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE In the Department of Biological Sciences O Mark Christopher Sidney 2005 SEviOiu' FiiASEii I..u'iVEiiSIT'k' Summer 2005 All rights reserved. This work may not be reproduced in whole or in part, by photocopy or other means, without permission of the author. APPROVAL Name: Mark Christopher Sidney Degree: Master of Science Title of Thesis: Tree-derived stimuli affecting host-selection response of larva and adult peach twig borers, Anarsia lineatella (Zeller) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) Examining Committee: Chair: Dr. E. Elle, Assistant Professor Dr. G. Gries, Professor Department of Biological Sciences, S.F.U. Dr. G. Judd, Research Scientist Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Summerland Dr. M. Winston, Professor Department of Biological Sciences, S.F.U. Dr. S. Lindgren, Professor Ecosystem Science and Management Program, University of Northern British Columbia Public Examiner Date Approved SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY PARTIAL COPYRIGHT LICENCE The author, whose copyright is declared on the title page of this work, has granted to Simon Fraser University the right to lend this thesis, project or extended essay to users of the Simon Fraser University Library, and to make partial or single copies only for such users or in response to a request from the library of any other university, or other educational institution, on its own behalf or for one of its users. The author has further granted permission to Simon Fraser University to keep or make a digital copy for use in its circulating collection. The author has further agreed that permission for multiple copying of this work for scholarly purposes may be granted by either the author or the Dean of Graduate Studies. It is understood that copying or publication of this work for financial gain shall not be allowed without the author's written permission.\ Permission for public performance, or limited permission for private scholarly use, of any multimedia materials forming part of this work, may have been granted by the author. This information may be found on the separately catalogued multimedia material and in the signed Partial Copyright Licence. The original Partial Copyright Licence attesting to these terms, and signed by this author, may be found in the original bound copy of this work, retained in the Simon Fraser University Archive. W. A. C. Bennett Library Simon Fraser University Burnaby, BC, Canada ABSTRACT Volatiles from ripening peach fruit reportedly mediate host-finding by adult peach twig borers, Anarsia lineatella (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae). However, moths were repelled by in-situ ripe peach fruits, and by a blend of 22 synthetic volatiles associated with ripe peach fruits. In laboratory experiments, females preferred hairy and creviced surfaces over glabrous surfaces as oviposition sites. Volatiles from almond and peach shoots induced oviposition, as did volatiles from immature, green mature, and hard-ripe peach fruits. Soft-ripe peach fruits, in contrast, did not induce oviposition, and when tested against immature peach fruits received three times fewer eggs. In laboratory olfactometer experiments, larvae of A. lineatella were found to orient chemoanemotactically toward Porapak Q extracts of peach shoot or almond shoot and fruit volatiles. P-Bourbonene and (E,E)-a-farnesene identified in almond shoot and fruit volatile extracts, and tested as a 2-component blend, were as attractive to larvae as was the entire extract. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In my thesis, I present data that refute reports that adult Anarsia lineatella (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) are attracted by olfactory stimuli from ripe peach fruit. Instead, I show that adult moths were repelled by in-situ soft-ripe peach fruits, and by a blend of 22 synthetic volatiles associated with soft-ripe fruits. Modifications of the fruit volatile blend composition, or dosage, and addition of nine synthetic volatiles from peach shoots, all failed to result in an attractive semiochemical blend. The selection of oviposition sites was found to be mediated by both tactile and semiochemical stimuli. Hairy and creviced surfaces were strongly favoured over glabrous surfaces as oviposition sites by female A. lineatella. Volatiles from almond and peach shoots induced oviposition, as did volatiles from immature, green mature, and hard-ripe peach fruits. Soft-ripe peach fruits, in contrast, did not induce oviposition, and when tested against immature peach fruits received three times fewer eggs. In field experiments, female A. lineatella laid more eggs on mechanically damaged in-situ peach fruits than on undamaged ones, as long as fruits were not yet at the soft-ripe maturation stage. Once damaged in-situ fruits had matured to the soft-ripe stage, they became repellent to A. lineatella, as shown for undamaged in-situ soft-ripe peach fruits. In laboratory experiments, larvae of A. lineatella were found to orient chemoanemotactically toward Porapak Q extracts of almond shoot and fruit volatiles. P-Bourbonene and (E,E)-a- famesene identified in such volatile extracts, and tested as a 2-component blend, were as attractive to larvae as was the entire extract. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to express my sincere thanks and appreciation to my senior supervisor, Gerhard Gries. His tireless support, guidance, and encouragement - and also understanding - made this thesis possible. I would also like to thank Ms. Regine Gries, for sharing her extensive knowledge of electrophysiological techniques and mass spectrometry with me, and generally improving/organizing my projectllife. Thanks to Dr. Gary Judd and Dr. Mark Winston for their input and critical review of my thesis, also for the use of the research orchard at PARC Summerland. I am also grateful to Dr. Kent Daane for shipment of experimental insects, and Bob Birtch for preparation of figures. I would like to thank Kaaaly Levan and James Duperron, Andrea Turner and Ron Schneider for graciously allowing me to run experiments in their orchards. Their warmth and generosity gave me a home away from home, quite literally. I am also indebted to many fellow students for their assistance over the years. First and foremost is Adela Danci, whose patience I aspire toward. Also to Lucian and Bogdana Mircioiu, Kendra Brown, Melanie Hart, and the rest of the Gries lab for field and lab asssistance. I would also like to thank Grigori Khaskin for synthesis of candidate semiochemicals. This work was supported in part by a Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) PGSA scholarship (M.S.) and a NSERC Research and Development grant (G.G .and G.J.R.J.) with financial contributions from the BC Fruit Growers' Association and Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada. Lastly, to my family and friends, whose gentle prodding kept me on track all these years. TABLE OF CONTENTS . Approval .............................................................11 ... Abstract .............................................................111 Executive Summary .....................................................iv Acknowledgements .....................................................v Tableofcontents ...................................................... vi ... List of Tables ........................................................viii I INTRODUCTION 1.1 SEMIOCHEMICAL-MEDIATED HOST SELECTION IN LEPIDOPTERAN INSECTS ...................................................... 1.2 DISTRIBUTION AND PEST STATUS OF Anarsia lineatella ..............5 1.3 BIOLOGY AND LIFE HISTORY 1.3.1 A. lineatella ............................................7 1.3.2 Prunus sp. host plants ....................................10 1.4 RESEARCH OBJECTIVES .......................................1 1 1.5 REFERENCES ................................................12 I1 EVIDENCE FOR OLFACTORY RECOGNITION OF HOST SEMIOCHEMICALS 2.1INTRODUCTION .............................................20 2.2 MATERIALS AND METHODS 2.2.1 Experimental insects .....................................2 1 2.2.2 Landing response of A. lineatella on host and nonhost trees .......... 23 2.2.3 Response to ex-situ ripe peach fruits in field experiments ........... 24 2.2.4 Response to synthetic volatiles from soft-ripe peach fruits and shoots in field experiments 2.2.4.1 Acquisition of soft-ripe peach fruit and shoot volatiles ..... 25 2.2.4.2 Identification of antennally-active soft-ripe peach fruit and shoot volatiles ...............................25 2.2.4.3 Field testing of candidate semiochemicals ...............26 2.2.5 Response to in-situ peach fruits in field cage experiments ...........27 2.3 RESULTS 2.3.1 Landing response of A. lineatella on host and nonhost trees .......... 29 2.3.2 Response to ex-situ ripe peach fruits in field experiments ........... 29 2.3.3 Response to synthetic volatiles from soft-ripe peach fruits and shoots in field experiments 2.3.3.1 Identification of antennally-active soft-ripe peach fruit and shoot volatiles ...............................30 2.3.3.2 Field testing of candidate semiochemicals .............. 30 2.3.4 Response to in-situ peach fruits in field cage experiments .......... 31 2.4DISCUSSION .................................................32 2.5 REFERENCES ................................................34 I11 STIMULI AFFECTING SELECTION
Recommended publications
  • Entomology) 1968, Ph.D
    RING T. CARDÉ a. Professional Preparation Tufts University B.S. (Biology), 1966 Cornell University M.S. (Entomology) 1968, Ph.D. (Entomology) 1971 New York State Agricultural Postdoctoral Associate, 1971-1975 Experiment Station at Geneva (Cornell University) b. Appointments and Professional Activities Positions Held 1996-present Distinguished Professor & Alfred M. Boyce Endowed Chair in Entomology, University of California, Riverside 2011 Visiting Professor, Swedish Agricultural University (SLU), Alnarp 2003-2009 Chair, Department of Entomology, University of California, Riverside 1989-1996 Distinguished University Professor, University of Massachusetts 1988 Visiting Scientist, Wageningen University 1984-1989 Professor of Entomology, University of Massachusetts 1981-1987; 1993-1995 Head, Entomology, University of Massachusetts 1981-1984 Associate Professor of Entomology, University of Massachusetts 1978-1981 Associate Professor of Entomology, Michigan State University 1975-1978 Assistant Professor of Entomology, Michigan State University Honors and Awards (selected) Certificate of Distinction for Outstanding Achievements, International Congress of Entomology, 2016 President, International Society of Chemical Ecology, 2012-2013 Jan Löfqvist Grant, Royal Academy of Natural Sciences, Medicine and Technology, Sweden, 2011 Silver Medal, International Society of Chemical Ecology, 2009 Awards for “Encyclopedia of Insects” include: • “Most Outstanding Single-Volume Reference in Science”, Association of American Publishers 2003 • “Outstanding
    [Show full text]
  • Folk Taxonomy, Nomenclature, Medicinal and Other Uses, Folklore, and Nature Conservation Viktor Ulicsni1* , Ingvar Svanberg2 and Zsolt Molnár3
    Ulicsni et al. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine (2016) 12:47 DOI 10.1186/s13002-016-0118-7 RESEARCH Open Access Folk knowledge of invertebrates in Central Europe - folk taxonomy, nomenclature, medicinal and other uses, folklore, and nature conservation Viktor Ulicsni1* , Ingvar Svanberg2 and Zsolt Molnár3 Abstract Background: There is scarce information about European folk knowledge of wild invertebrate fauna. We have documented such folk knowledge in three regions, in Romania, Slovakia and Croatia. We provide a list of folk taxa, and discuss folk biological classification and nomenclature, salient features, uses, related proverbs and sayings, and conservation. Methods: We collected data among Hungarian-speaking people practising small-scale, traditional agriculture. We studied “all” invertebrate species (species groups) potentially occurring in the vicinity of the settlements. We used photos, held semi-structured interviews, and conducted picture sorting. Results: We documented 208 invertebrate folk taxa. Many species were known which have, to our knowledge, no economic significance. 36 % of the species were known to at least half of the informants. Knowledge reliability was high, although informants were sometimes prone to exaggeration. 93 % of folk taxa had their own individual names, and 90 % of the taxa were embedded in the folk taxonomy. Twenty four species were of direct use to humans (4 medicinal, 5 consumed, 11 as bait, 2 as playthings). Completely new was the discovery that the honey stomachs of black-coloured carpenter bees (Xylocopa violacea, X. valga)were consumed. 30 taxa were associated with a proverb or used for weather forecasting, or predicting harvests. Conscious ideas about conserving invertebrates only occurred with a few taxa, but informants would generally refrain from harming firebugs (Pyrrhocoris apterus), field crickets (Gryllus campestris) and most butterflies.
    [Show full text]
  • Pheromone Trap Catch of Harmful Microlepidoptera Species in Connection with the Chemical Air Pollutants
    International Journal of Research in Environmental Science (IJRES) Volume 2, Issue 1, 2016, PP 1-10 ISSN 2454-9444 (Online) http://dx.doi.org/10.20431/2454-9444.0201001 www.arcjournals.org Pheromone Trap Catch of Harmful Microlepidoptera Species in Connection with the Chemical Air Pollutants L. Nowinszky1, J. Puskás1, G. Barczikay2 1University of West Hungary Savaria University centre, Szombathely, Károlyi Gáspár Square 4 2County Borsod-Abaúj-Zemplén Agricultural Office of Plant Protection and Soil Conservation Directorate, Bodrogkisfalud, Vasút Street. 22 [email protected], [email protected] Abstract: In this study, seven species of Microlepidoptera pest pheromone trap collection presents the results of the everyday function of the chemical air pollutants (SO2, NO, NO2, NOx, CO, PM10, O3). Between 2004 and 2013 Csalomon type pheromone traps were operating in Bodrogkisfalud (48°10’N; 21°21E; Borsod-Abaúj- Zemplén County, Hungary, Europe). The data were processed of following species: Spotted Tentiform Leafminer (Phyllonorycter blancardella Fabricius, 1781), Hawthorn Red Midged Moth (Phyllonorycter corylifoliella Hübner, 1796), Peach Twig Borer (Anarsia lineatella Zeller, 1839), European Vine Moth (Lobesia botrana Denis et Schiffermüller, 1775), Plum Fruit Moth (Grapholita funebrana Treitschke, 1846), Oriental Fruit Moth (Grapholita molesta Busck, 1916) and Codling Moth (Cydia pomonella Linnaeus, 1758). The relation is linear, logarithmic and polynomial functions can be characterized. Keywords: Microlepidoptera, pests, pheromone traps, air pollution 1. INTRODUCTION Since the last century, air pollution has become a major environmental problem, mostly over large cities and industrial areas (Cassiani et al. 2013). It is natural that the air pollutant chemicals influence the life phenomena of insects, such as flight activity as well.
    [Show full text]
  • Izatha (Insecta: Lepidoptera: Gelechioidea: Oecophoridae)
    Hoare, R. J. B. 2010: Izatha (Insecta: Lepidoptera: Gelechioidea: Oecophoridae). Fauna of New Zealand 65, 201 pp. The Copyright notice printed on page 4 applies to the use of this PDF. This PDF is not to be posted on websites. Links should be made to: FNZ.LandcareResearch.co.nz EDITORIAL BOARD Dr R. M. Emberson, c/- Department of Ecology, P.O. Box 84, Lincoln University, New Zealand Dr M. J. Fletcher, Director of the Collections, NSW Agricultural Scientific Collections Unit, Forest Road, Orange, NSW 2800, Australia Dr R. J. B. Hoare, Landcare Research, Private Bag 92170, Auckland, New Zealand Dr M.-C. Larivière, Landcare Research, Private Bag 92170, Auckland, New Zealand Mr R. L. Palma, Natural Environment Department, Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa, P.O. Box 467, Wellington, New Zealand SERIES EDITOR Dr T. K. Crosby, Landcare Research, Private Bag 92170, Auckland, New Zealand Fauna of New Zealand Ko te Aitanga Pepeke o Aotearoa Number / Nama 65 Izatha (Insecta: Lepidoptera: Gelechioidea: Oecophoridae) Robert J. B. Hoare Landcare Research, Private Bag 92170, Auckland 1142, New Zealand [email protected] with colour plates by B.E. Rhode Manaak i W h e n u a P R E S S Lincoln, Canterbury, New Zealand 2010 4 Hoare (2010): Izatha (Insecta: Lepidoptera: Gelechioidea: Oecophoridae) Copyright © Landcare Research New Zealand Ltd 2010 No part of this work covered by copyright may be reproduced or copied in any form or by any means (graphic, electronic, or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, taping information retrieval systems, or otherwise) without the written permission of the publisher.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Modern Threats to the Lepidoptera Fauna in The
    MODERN THREATS TO THE LEPIDOPTERA FAUNA IN THE FLORIDA ECOSYSTEM By THOMSON PARIS A THESIS PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2011 1 2011 Thomson Paris 2 To my mother and father who helped foster my love for butterflies 3 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS First, I thank my family who have provided advice, support, and encouragement throughout this project. I especially thank my sister and brother for helping to feed and label larvae throughout the summer. Second, I thank Hillary Burgess and Fairchild Tropical Gardens, Dr. Jonathan Crane and the University of Florida Tropical Research and Education center Homestead, FL, Elizabeth Golden and Bill Baggs Cape Florida State Park, Leroy Rogers and South Florida Water Management, Marshall and Keith at Mack’s Fish Camp, Susan Casey and Casey’s Corner Nursery, and Michael and EWM Realtors Inc. for giving me access to collect larvae on their land and for their advice and assistance. Third, I thank Ryan Fessendon and Lary Reeves for helping to locate sites to collect larvae and for assisting me to collect larvae. I thank Dr. Marc Minno, Dr. Roxanne Connely, Dr. Charles Covell, Dr. Jaret Daniels for sharing their knowledge, advice, and ideas concerning this project. Fourth, I thank my committee, which included Drs. Thomas Emmel and James Nation, who provided guidance and encouragement throughout my project. Finally, I am grateful to the Chair of my committee and my major advisor, Dr. Andrei Sourakov, for his invaluable counsel, and for serving as a model of excellence of what it means to be a scientist.
    [Show full text]
  • Dr. Frank G. Zalom
    Award Category: Lifetime Achievement The Lifetime Achievement in IPM Award goes to an individual who has devoted his or her career to implementing IPM in a specific environment. The awardee must have devoted their career to enhancing integrated pest management in implementation, team building, and integration across pests, commodities, systems, and disciplines. New for the 9th International IPM Symposium The Lifetime Achievement winner will be invited to present his or other invited to present his or her own success story as the closing plenary speaker. At the same time, the winner will also be invited to publish one article on their success of their program in the Journal of IPM, with no fee for submission. Nominator Name: Steve Nadler Nominator Company/Affiliation: Department of Entomology and Nematology, University of California, Davis Nominator Title: Professor and Chair Nominator Phone: 530-752-2121 Nominator Email: [email protected] Nominee Name of Individual: Frank Zalom Nominee Affiliation (if applicable): University of California, Davis Nominee Title (if applicable): Distinguished Professor and IPM specialist, Department of Entomology and Nematology, University of California, Davis Nominee Phone: 530-752-3687 Nominee Email: [email protected] Attachments: Please include the Nominee's Vita (Nominator you can either provide a direct link to nominee's Vita or send email to Janet Hurley at [email protected] with subject line "IPM Lifetime Achievement Award Vita include nominee name".) Summary of nominee’s accomplishments (500 words or less): Describe the goals of the nominee’s program being nominated; why was the program conducted? What condition does this activity address? (250 words or less): Describe the level of integration across pests, commodities, systems and/or disciplines that were involved.
    [Show full text]
  • Fhnews 171 Mar.P65
    forest health news No. 171, March 2007 ISSN 1175-9755 ENSIS SCIENTISTS CONTRIBUTE TO FOREST LIGHT BROWN APPLE MOTH IN CALIFORNIA BIOSECURITY CONFERENCE IN THE USA Epiphyas postvittana (light brown apple moth) is a south-east The USDA Interagency Research Forum on Invasive Species, one Australian leaf-rolling moth that was first found in New Zealand of the principal conferences on invasive forest pests and diseases, in 1887. It has also become established in Tasmania, south-western takes place in Annapolis, Maryland, every January. Ensis scientists Australia, New Caledonia, Hawaii, and the United Kingdom. have attended this forum on several occasions and this year Ecki Brockerhoff and Tod Ramsfield were invited to contribute new information on bark beetle introductions and on genetic tools used in pathogen research, respectively. This conference has become an important forum for the exchange of information on invasive species and their management, and for encouraging collaboration among scientists from around the world. Colleagues in the USA have their hands full due to a series of recent incursions and introductions including the Asian long- horned beetle (Anoplophora glabripennis) (FH News 123:2), the emerald ash borer (Agrilus planipennis) (FH News 125:2), Sirex noctilio, and sudden oak death (Phytophthora ramorum) (FH News 123:1). In addition, there is much ongoing work on attempting to Epiphyas postvittana adult minimise the impact and to prevent the further spread of earlier introductions such as gypsy moth (Lymantria dispar) which causes Recently two E. postvittana moths were caught in a light trap much defoliation in the eastern USA during periodic outbreaks.
    [Show full text]
  • Gelechiidae Biosecurity Occurrence Background Subfamilies Short
    Ardozyga stratifera (Gelechiinae) Gelechiidae Twirler Moths or Gelechiid Moths Biosecurity BIOSECURITY ALERT This Family is of Biosecurity Concern Occurrence This family occurs in Australia. Background The micromoth family Gelechiidae is the namesake family for the enormous superfamily Gelechioidea and is one of the most diverse families of the Lepidoptera. Gelechiids are very small moths with narrow wings. The family has a worldwide distribution and is diverse with over 4,700 known species in 500 genera, but that number would be at least doubled with undescribed and new species. The family is particularly prevalent in North America because of the close association of species with Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga). The caterpillars have very diverse feeding habits on many plant parts and species. Many species are external feeders but are protected by a shelter of some kind, often in tied or rolled leaves (Fig. 1). Many others feed internally, boring into flower heads, stems (Fig. 2) or roots. They are leaf-miners (Fig. 11), gall-inducers or stem-borers, or feed within flowers or fruits (Fig. 13). They also can be concealed in silken tunnels in earth or in portable cases. Not surprisingly, therefore, there are many gelechiids that are agricultural pests, such as: the pink bollworm, Pectinophora gossypiella (Fig. 13), one of the most destructive pests of cotton in the world; Sitotroga cerealella (Angoumois grain moth); Phthorimaea operculella (potato tuber moth); and, Tuta absoluta (tomato leaf miner). Contrastingly, several species have been used as biocontrol agents against weeds. One Australian species feeds on dead leaf litter. Fig. 1. Mature caterpillar of the widespread Australian gelechiid Ardozyga stratifera (Gelechiinae).
    [Show full text]
  • Microorganisms and Their Byproducts, Nematodes, Oils and Particle Films
    REVIEW ARTICLE t Microorganisms and their byproducts, nematodes, oils Larry D. Godfrey Elizabeth E. Grafton-Cardwell Harry K. Kaya William E. Chaney t The insect and mite control potential of natural and biological toxins has been recognized for several centuries. Bacteria, viruses, protozoa and fungi are the primary groups of micro- organisms known to reduce insect populations; they often occur natu- rally in fields and function as compo- Natural and botanical products have been nents of biological control. Beneficial used to control insect pests for centuries. nematodes are also being used for Kaolin is a mineral-based particle film that is sprayed onto crops as a barrier to repel pest control, especially against soil in- insects and prevent feeding. sects. The isolation of toxic metabolic compounds from microorganisms con- tinues to be a fruitful research area, The insect-control potential of natu- biological agents that are being used although there are barriers to their ral and biological toxins has been rec- for pest control, especially against soil successful marketing and distribution. ognized for several centuries. As early insects. Several species of beneficial Another, more controversial way to as 2700 B.C., unintended epizootics nematodes are commercially available, (outbreaks of disease affecting many and the animal itself acts as a distribu- deliver these insect-specific toxins to animals of one species at the same time) tion tool for symbiotic bacteria that the target pest is through genetically by natural enemies (microorganisms) actually kill the target pest. As with the modified plants, such as those modi- were reported in beneficial insects such microorganisms, the ability to produce fied to express Bacillus thuringiensis as silkworms and honeybees.
    [Show full text]
  • IHS Fresh Fruit/Vegetables
    Import Health Standard Commodity Sub-class: Fresh Fruit/Vegetables Cherries, Prunus avium from the United States of America – States of Idaho, Oregon and Washington ISSUED Issued pursuant to Section 22 of the Biosecurity Act 1993 Date Issued: 4 July 2005 IHS Fresh Fruit/Vegetables. Prunus avium from the United States of America – 4 July 2005 States of Idaho, Oregon and Washington (Biosecurity Act 1993) 1 Contents Endorsement Review and amendment Distribution INTRODUCTION SCOPE REFERENCES DEFINITIONS, ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS OUTLINE OF REQUIREMENTS NEW ZEALAND LEGISLATIVE REQUIREMENTS AND INTERNATIONAL OBLIGATIONS IMPORT HEALTH STANDARD: FRESH FRUIT/VEGETABLES – PRUNUS AVIUM FROM THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA – STATES OF IDAHO, OREGON AND WASHINGTON 1 Official contact point (New Zealand National Plant Protection Organisation) 2 General conditions for the importation of all plants and plant products 3 Explanation of pest categories 4 Application of measures 5 General conditions for fresh fruit/vegetables for consumption 6 Specific conditions for cherries (Commodity Sub-Class: Fresh Fruit/Vegetables) from the United States of America – States of Idaho, Oregon and Washington 6.1 Pre-shipment requirements 6.1.1 Inspection of the consignment 6.1.2 Testing of the consignment 6.1.3 Phytosanitary measures for high impact pests 6.1.4 Documentation 6.1.5 Phytosanitary certification 6.1.6 Additional declarations to the phytosanitary certificate 6.2 Transit requirements 6.3 Inspection on arrival in New Zealand 6.4 Biosecurity/quarantine directive 6.5 Testing for regulated pests 6.6 Actions undertaken on the interception/detection of pests/contaminants 6.7 Biosecurity clearance 6.8 Audit of offshore measures 6.9 Feedback on non-compliance 7 Contingencies following biosecurity clearance Appendix 1: Categorised pest list Appendix 2: Pre-arrival phytosanitary measures for high impact fruit flies IHS Fresh Fruit/Vegetables.
    [Show full text]
  • Managing Vegetation for Agronomic and Ecological Benefits in California Nut Orchards
    Managing Vegetation for Agronomic and Ecological Benefits in California Nut Orchards February 2021 MANAGING VEGETATION FOR AGRONOMIC & ECOLOGICAL BENEFITS – CALIFORNIA NUT ORCHARDS PAGE 1 Acknowledgements This report was developed by Environmental Defense Fund with support from Environmental Incentives. We thank Amélie Gaudin, Vivian Wauters and Neal Williams (University of California, Davis); Rex Dufour (National Center for Appropriate Technology) and Lauren Hale (USDA Agricultural Research Service) for their valuable contributions. MANAGING VEGETATION FOR AGRONOMIC & ECOLOGICAL BENEFITS – CALIFORNIA NUT ORCHARDS PAGE 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction .............................................................................. 4 State of Research: Managed Vegetation in Nut Orchards .............. 5 Ecosystem Services and Business Value of Managed Vegetation .......................................... 5 Climate Change Impacts .................................................................................................11 Grower Decision-Making ........................................................... 13 Grower Perceptions ........................................................................................................13 Communication Networks ...............................................................................................16 Key Considerations ................................................................... 17 Selecting Plant Species ...................................................................................................17
    [Show full text]
  • Taxonomic Confusion Around the Peach Twig Borer, Anarsia Lineatella
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Nota lepidopterologica Jahr/Year: 2017 Band/Volume: 40 Autor(en)/Author(s): Gregersen Keld, Karsholt Ole Artikel/Article: Taxonomic confusion around the Peach Twig Borer, Anarsia lineatella Zeller, 1839, with description of a new species (Lepidoptera, Gelechiidae) 65-85 ©Societas Europaea Lepidopterologica; download unter http://www.soceurlep.eu/ und www.zobodat.at Nota Lepi. 40(1) 2017: 65–85 | DOI 10.3897/nl.40.11184 Taxonomic confusion around the Peach Twig Borer, Anarsia lineatella Zeller, 1839, with description of a new species (Lepidoptera, Gelechiidae) Keld Gregersen1, Ole Karsholt2 1 Fru Ingesvej 13, DK-4180, Denmark; [email protected] 2 Zoological Museum, Natural History Museum of Denmark, Universitetsparken 15, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark; [email protected] http://zoobank.org/B06525D1-90F4-469F-B156-F33933FD7889 Received 7 January 2017; accepted 31 January 2017; published: 23 March 2017 Subject Editor: Lauri Kaila. Abstract. A new species of Gelechiidae is described as Anarsia innoxiella sp. n., based on differences in morphology and biology. It is closely related to and has hitherto been confused with the Peach Twig Borer, Anarsia lineatella Zeller, 1839. Whereas larvae of the latter feed on – and are known to be a pest of – Prunus species (Rosaceae), the larva of A. innoxiella feeds on Acer species (Sapindaceae). All known synonyms of A. lineatella are discussed in detail, including Anarsia lineatella subsp. heratella Amsel, 1967, from Afghanistan and A. lineatella subsp. tauricella Amsel, 1967, from Turkey. Our study has shown no evidence for changing the present taxonomic status of these two taxa.
    [Show full text]