DOCSLIB.ORG

Gerard Genette and the Categorization of Textual Transcendence

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Gerard Genette and the Categorization of Textual Transcendence ISSN 2039-2117 (online) Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences Vol 6 No 5 ISSN 2039-9340 (print) MCSER Publishing, Rome-Italy September 2015 Gerard Genette and the Categorization of Textual Transcendence Sayyed Ali Mirenayat PhD candidate in English Literature, Faculty of Modern Languages and Communication, Universiti Putra Malaysia Elaheh Soofastaei PhD candidate in English Literature, Faculty of Modern Languages and Communication, Universiti Putra Malaysia [email protected], [email protected] Doi:10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n5p533 Abstract A text relation with other texts has been a significant subject, which attracted the consideration of researchers, such as Julia Kristeva, Roland Barthes and etc. within Structuralism and Post-Structuralism. Gerard Genette, a French literary theorist, is one of the researchers who define “transtextuality” as a theory which is used when we are not sure about the interpretation of one text that we are reading. His theory describes the different methods in later text which motivates us to read an earlier one. This is the important reason that I have decided to look at his different methods. Genette broadens the study area of Julia Kristeva about “intertextuality” as a theory pointing to relation between various texts. He defines five categories of transtextuality, including intertextuality, paratextuality, metatextuality, architextuality, and hypertextuality, which this paper will explore them as Genette’s textual transcendence. Keywords: Transtextuality, Intertextuality, Paratextuality, Metatextuality, Architextuality, Hypertextuality, Hypotextuality 1. Introduction A text is … a multidimensional space in which a variety of writings, none of them original, blend and clash. The text is a tissue of quotations … The writer can only imitate a gesture that is always anterior, never original. His only power is to mix writings, to counter the ones with the others, in such a way as never to rest on any one of them. (Barthes, 1997) A literary work is created of “a text, defined (very minimally) as a more or less long sequence of verbal statements that are more or less long endowed with significance”. But it is “rarely presented in an unadorned state, unreinforced and unaccompanied by a certain number of verbal or other productions” (Gerard, 1997b:1). In the 1960s, it was Julia Kristeva who used "Intertextuality" for the first time, pointing to any relation between different texts. A theory of the text that expands the identity of the text to include its origins in and its uses of texts of the past is Intertextuality. No text is self-born and every text of the present is an inter-text with something happening between it and a text of the past. After that, Gerard Genette widened the study area of Kristeva, and called relation between a text with other texts or different from its own as "transtextuality" or textual transcendence and he subdivided this type into five categories where intertextuality was only one type. As for transtextuality, Genette says that “all that sets the text in a relationship, whether obvious or concealed, with other texts” which it “covers all aspects of a particular text” (1992, pp 83-84). He examines the relation between a text with other texts broader and more systemic than Julia Kristeva and Roland Barthes. Genette's studies involve territory of structuralism, post-structuralism and semiotics too, and this permits him to examine intertextual relationships with all its variables. He calls the collection of these relations, "transtextuality". Transtextuality is how to communicate a text with other texts. His transtextuality continued with his book Palimpsestes (1982). Other categories were called "architextuality", "paratextuality", "metatextuality" and "hypertextuality", each with their own subcategories. Of all these categories, Intertextuality and Hypertextuality study the relationship between two artistic texts, whereas Transtextuality is the study of the relation of a text to the related hypertext. On the other hand, Paratextuality probes into the relation of a text to other connected or separated texts. 533 ISSN 2039-2117 (online) Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences Vol 6 No 5 ISSN 2039-9340 (print) MCSER Publishing, Rome-Italy September 2015 2. What Is Intertextuality? Intertextuality was refined by Genette in 1997 with a term, namely transtextuality, by Graham Allen as “intertextuality from the viewpoint of structural poetics – the theory of reading that investigates, rather than particular works, systems within which texts are constructed, with or without readers’ or writers’ awareness” (Morris, 2007). Intertextuality topics had great effect on Tel Quel Thought which Philippe Sollers, Jacques Derrida, Roland Barthes and Julia Kristeva were members of it. In their sight, intertextuality is one of the aspects of shaping the text. Elements that often cannot identify their sign clearly and it doesn’t need to identify them. Intertextuality causes dynamism and poly-tonic and no text is without intertextuality. Barthes clearly declares it and says that every text is intertextual. According to Genette, intertextuality involves all relations of a text with other texts. Intertextuality in Genette's idea is different from Kristeva's idea, because Genette's intertextuality has more limited dimensions. Also, intertextuality is the relationship between two texts according to the co-presence. In other words, if part of a text (text 1) attends in the other text (text 2), the relationship between them is intertextual. Genette uses the term "intertextuality" for a rich mosaic of echoes of, quotations from, allusion to and parallelisms with other texts in a text such as The Waste Land by T.S Eliot. Intertextuality includes quotation, plagiarism, and allusion. Genette divides intertextuality into three large categories: implicit or explicit; covert or overt; hidden or open. For the first one, explicit intertextuality expresses overt presence of a text in the other text. In clearer word, in this kind of intertextuality, second text's author doesn’t intend to hide his/her text's reference (first text). So we can observe the presence of other text in it. From this perspective, quotation is considered as intertextuality. For the second one, covert intertextuality indicates the hidden presence of a text in another text. In other words, this kind of intertextuality tries to hide its intertextuality reference and this secrecy is not only because of literary necessities, but also it has extra literary reasons. Plagiarism is considered one of the most important implicit intertextuality. Plagiarism is use of another text without permission and mention of reference. And for the last one, sometimes the second text's author is not going to hide his/her intertextual and because of that, he/she uses signs that we can recognize intertextual and even its reference. But this act has never been done explicitly and it is sufficient to implicit allusions because of literary reasons. So implicit intertextuality announces its reference not alike explicit intertextuality and not tries to hide like implicit intertextuality. The most important forms of this intertextual are allusions, allegories and metaphors. Genette says: its less explicit form is allusion; it means that it should be to have high intelligence to understand the relationship between a text and another text that it returns some parts to it necessarily. 3. Paratextuality Para means “beside” and paratextuality is the relation between a text and its 'paratext' – that which surrounds the main body of the text - such as titles, headings, prefaces, acknowledgements, footnotes, illustrations, and etc. In Genette’s view, paratextuality comprises, Those liminal devices and conventions, both within the book (peritext) and outside it (epitext), that mediate the book to the reader: titles and subtitles, pseudonyms, forewords, dedications, epigraphs, prefaces, intertitles, notes, epilogues, and afterwords – all those framing elements that so engaged Sterne; but also the elements in the public and private history of the book, its “epitext,” … “public epitexts” as well as “private epitexts”. (1997b) To Genette, the paratext marks the components at the threshold of the text in order to direct the acceptance of a text by the readers. “The paratext performs various pragmatic functions which guide the readers to understand when the text was published, who published it, for what purpose, and how it should or should not be read.” He also “makes a distinction between paratexts, which are autographic; by the author, and allographic; by someone other than the editor, such as an editor or a publisher. The main function of the autographic or allographic preface is to encourage the reader to read the text, and to instruct the reader in how to read the text properly. With his account of paratextuality, Genette takes a different stance than the post-structuralists who dismissed the authorial intention. The structuralist version of intertextuality reasserts the importance of authorial intention” (Simandan, 31). Genette is “more fascinated by the fringes and borderlands between regimes that these explorations open up”. He claims that “paratext is especially rich in these regions of ambiguity. This the terrain of the paratext poses intriguing problems for any speech-act analysis, situated as it is between the first-order illocutionary domain of the public world and that of the second-order speech-act analysis, situated as it is between the first-order illocutionary
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Rethinking the Relationship Between Plagiarism and Academic Integrity
    Document generated on 09/30/2021 1:32 p.m. Revue internationale des technologies en pédagogie universitaire International Journal of Technologies in Higher Education Rethinking the relationship between plagiarism and academic integrity Repenser la relation entre le plagiat et l’intégrité académique Sandra Jamieson and Rebecca Moore Howard Du plagiat à l’intégrité académique : quelles compétences, quelles Article abstract stratégies? The term academic integrity is in widespread use, and while there has been From plagiarism to academic integrity: Which skills, which much debate about what is included under that term and how we measure and strategies? encourage integrity in an academic context, no specific definition has been Volume 16, Number 2, 2019 codified and universally accepted. This article reviews the historical evolution of the phrase through scholarship beginning in the 1960s, its shifting definition URI: https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1067061ar as an ethical or moral concept, and the ways in which it is currently being used, with a focus on the logics by which textual errors came to be classified as moral lapses. This article also provides analysis of students’ textual errors as See table of contents they work from sources. Based on these analyses, we advocate bringing together all cheating behaviors, including academic ghostwriting, under the umbrella of academic integrity and calling them cheating, plain and simple. At Publisher(s) the same time, we contend that textual errors such as patchwriting and faulty citation should be removed from the moral category of academic integrity and CRIFPE treated as instances of bad writing to be remedied by pedagogy, not punishment.
    [Show full text]
  • The Art of Adaptation
    Ritgerð til M.A.-prófs Bókmenntir, Menning og Miðlun The Art of Adaptation The move from page to stage/screen, as seen through three films Margrét Ann Thors 301287-3139 Leiðbeinandi: Guðrún Björk Guðsteinsdóttir Janúar 2020 2 Big TAKK to ÓBS, “Óskar Helps,” for being IMDB and the (very) best 3 Abstract This paper looks at the art of adaptation, specifically the move from page to screen/stage, through the lens of three films from the early aughts: Spike Jonze’s Adaptation, Alejandro González Iñárritu’s Birdman, or The Unexpected Virtue of Ignorance, and Joel and Ethan Coen’s O Brother, Where Art Thou? The analysis identifies three main adaptation-related themes woven throughout each of these films, namely, duality/the double, artistic madness/genius, and meta- commentary on the art of adaptation. Ultimately, the paper seeks to argue that contrary to common opinion, adaptations need not be viewed as derivatives of or secondary to their source text; rather, just as in nature species shift, change, and evolve over time to better suit their environment, so too do (and should) narratives change to suit new media, cultural mores, and modes of storytelling. The analysis begins with a theoretical framing that draws on T.S. Eliot’s, Linda Hutcheon’s, Kamilla Elliott’s, and Julie Sanders’s thoughts about the art of adaptation. The framing then extends to notions of duality/the double and artistic madness/genius, both of which feature prominently in the films discussed herein. Finally, the framing concludes with a discussion of postmodernism, and the basis on which these films can be situated within the postmodern artistic landscape.
    [Show full text]
  • Translating Ironic Intertextual Allusions.” In: Martínez Sierra, Juan José & Patrick Zabalbeascoa Terran (Eds.) 2017
    Recibido / Received: 30/06/2016 Aceptado / Accepted: 16/11/2016 Para enlazar con este artículo / To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.6035/MonTI.2017.9.5 Para citar este artículo / To cite this article: LIEVOIS, Katrien. (2017) “Translating ironic intertextual allusions.” In: Martínez Sierra, Juan José & Patrick Zabalbeascoa Terran (eds.) 2017. The Translation of Humour / La traducción del humor. MonTI 9, pp. 1-24. TRANSLATING IRONIC INTERTEXTUAL ALLUSIONS Katrien Lievois [email protected] Université d’Anvers Translated from French by Trish Van Bolderen1 [email protected] University of Ottawa Abstract Based on a corpus consisting of Albert Camus’s La Chute, Hugo Claus’s Le chagrin des Belges, Fouad Laroui’s Une année chez les Français and their Dutch versions, this article examines the ways in which ironic intertextual allusions are translated. It begins with a presentation of the theoretical concepts underpinning the analysis and subsequently identifies, through a detailed study, the following nine strategies: standard translation; literal translation; translation using markers; non-translation; translation into a third language; glosses; omissions; substitutions using intertextuality from the target culture; and substitutions using architextuality. Resume A partir d’un corpus constitué de La Chute d’Albert Camus, du Chagrin des Belges de Hugo Claus et d’Une année chez les Français de Fouad Laroui, ainsi que leurs versions néerlandaises, cette contribution s’intéresse à la traduction de l’allusion intertextuelle ironique. Elle présente d’abord les concepts théoriques qui sous-tendent l’analyse, pour ensuite étudier plus en détail les 9 stratégies rencontrées : la traduction standard, la traduction littérale, la traduction avec marquage, la non-traduction, la traduction primera 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Consumption, Pastiche and Identity in Postmodern Visual Culture
    CONSUMPTION, PASTICHE AND IDENTITY IN POSTMODERN VISUAL CULTURE by Marianna Jadwiga Winczewski Submitted in partial fulfilment for the degree of Magister Artium in Information Design FACULTY OF HUMANITIES UNIVERSITY OF PRETORIA OCTOBER 2008 Supervisor: Prof E Dreyer © University of Pretoria I declare that the writing and technical production of Pastiche, Consumption and Identity in Postmodern Visual Culture is entirely my own work. All sources that I have used or quoted have been indicated and acknowledged by means of complete references. This document is the copyrighted property of the University of Pretoria, and may not be reproduced or copied in any form. Should this research or sections thereof be quoted or referred to in any way, this must be acknowledged in full. Signature __________________________________ Date _______ ii UNIVERSITY OF PRETORIA FACULTY OF HUMANITIES DEPARTMENT OF VISUAL ARTS I (full names) Marianna Jadwiga Winczewski Student number 20148242 Subject of the work Pastiche, Consumption and Identity in Postmodern Visual Culture Declaration 1. I understand what plagiarism entails and am aware of the University’s policy in this regard. 2. I declare that this mini-dissertation is my own, original work. Where someone else’s work was used (whether from a printed source, the internet or any other source) due acknowledgement was given and reference was made according to departmental requirements. 3. I did not make use of another student’s previous work and submitted it as my own. 4. I did not allow and will not allow anyone to copy my work with the intention of presenting it as his or her own work.
    [Show full text]
  • Intertextuality in Selected Works of Evelyn Waugh Janelle Lynn Ortega
    University of New Mexico UNM Digital Repository English Language and Literature ETDs Electronic Theses and Dissertations 6-9-2016 "I Heard the Same Thing Once Before": Intertextuality in Selected Works of Evelyn Waugh Janelle Lynn Ortega Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/engl_etds Part of the English Language and Literature Commons Recommended Citation Ortega, Janelle Lynn. ""I Heard the Same Thing Once Before": Intertextuality in Selected Works of Evelyn Waugh." (2016). https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/engl_etds/23 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Electronic Theses and Dissertations at UNM Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in English Language and Literature ETDs by an authorized administrator of UNM Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. i Janelle Lynn Ortega Candidate Department of English Language and Literature Department This dissertation is approved, and it is acceptable in quality and form for publication: Approved by the Dissertation Committee: Dr. Steve Benz, Chairperson Dr. Lynn Beene Dr. Anita Obermeier Dr. Mara Reisman ii “I Heard the Same Thing Once Before”: Intertextuality in Selected Works of Evelyn Waugh by Janelle Ortega B.A. in English, 2001 M.A. in English, 2005 Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy In English The University of New Mexico Albuquerque, New Mexico May 2016 Copyright © Janelle Ortega, 2016 iii Dedication For My Husband, “If ever two were one, then surely we.” and For Dr. John Howard Wilson, May Eternal Rest be Granted unto You. iv Acknowledgements I owe many people ten years of “thank you”s.
    [Show full text]
  • Defining and Avoiding Plagiarism: the WPA Statement on Best Practices Council of Writing Program Administrators ( January 2003
    Defining and Avoiding Plagiarism: The WPA Statement on Best Practices Council of Writing Program Administrators (http://www.wpacouncil.org), January 2003. Plagiarism has always concerned teachers and administrators, who want students’ work to represent their own efforts and to reflect the outcomes of their learning. However, with the advent of the Internet and easy access to almost limitless written material on every conceivable topic, suspicion of student plagiarism has begun to affect teachers at all levels, at times diverting them from the work of developing students’ writing, reading, and critical thinking abilities. This statement responds to the growing educational concerns about plagiarism in four ways: by defining plagiarism; by suggesting some of the causes of plagiarism; by proposing a set of responsibilities (for students, teachers, and administrators) to address the problem of plagiarism; and by recommending a set of practices for teaching and learning that can significantly reduce the likelihood of plagiarism. The statement is intended to provide helpful suggestions and clarifications so that instructors, administrators, and students can work together more effectively in support of excellence in teaching and learning. What Is Plagiarism? In instructional settings, plagiarism is a multifaceted and ethically complex problem. However, if any definition of plagiarism is to be helpful to administrators, faculty, and students, it needs to be as simple and direct as possible within the context for which it is intended. Definition: In an instructional setting, plagiarism occurs when a writer deliberately uses someone else’s language, ideas, or other original (not common-knowledge) material without acknowledging its source. This definition applies to texts published in print or on-line, to manuscripts, and to the work of other student writers.
    [Show full text]
  • LIT 3003: the Forms of Narrative - Narrating the Ineffable Section 025F
    LIT 3003: The Forms of Narrative - Narrating the Ineffable Section 025F Instructor:Cristina Ruiz-Poveda Email:[email protected] Meetings:MTWRF Period 5 (2-3:15pm) at TUR 2350 Office hours:MW 3:15-4 pm, and by appointment at TUR 4415 "Whereof one cannot speak, thereof one must be silent." From Ludwig Wittgenstein’sTractatus The Tao that can be spoken is not the eternal Tao The name that can be named is not the eternal name From Lao Tzu’sTao Те С hing Course description: Storytelling is such an inherent part of human experience that we often overlook how narratives, even those which may be foundational to our world views, are articulated. This course serves as an introduction to narrative forms, as well as a critical exploration of the potentialnarratology of —the theory of narrative—to analyze stories of ineffable experiences. How do narratives convey elusive existential and spiritual concepts? Are there shared formal and procedural traits of such narratives? In this class, we will learn the foundations of narratology, so as critically analyze how different narrative media (literature, visual culture, film, etc.) represent intense but seemingly incommunicable human experiences. These stories will serve as a vehicle to explore the limits of storytelling and to analyze narrative strategies at those limits. Students will also experiment with different forms of narrative through creative activities. Please note: this is not a course in religion or religious art history. This course is a survey of narratology: it offers theoretical tools to analytically understand narrativesabout profound existential concerns and transcendental experiences. Course goals and outcomes:by the end of the semester you should be able to..
    [Show full text]
  • Pastiche in Paul Auster's the New York Trilogy
    qw Advances in Language and Literary Studies ISSN: 2203-4714 Vol. 7 No. 5; October 2016 Australian International Academic Centre, Australia Flourishing Creativity & Literacy Pastiche in Paul Auster’s The New York Trilogy Maedeh Zare’e (Corresponding author) Islamic Azad University, Tehran Central Branch, Iran E-mail: [email protected] Razieh Eslamieh Islamic Azad University, Parand Branch, Iran Doi:10.7575/aiac.alls.v.7n.5p.197 Received: 17/06/2016 URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.7n.5p.197 Accepted: 28/08/2016 Abstract This article is a Jamesonian study of Auster’s The New York Trilogy in which one of Fredric Jameson’s notions of postmodernism, pastiche, has been applied on three stories of the novel. This novel is one of Auster’s outstanding postmodern works to which Jameson’s theories of postmodernism, in particular, pastiche can be applicable. Pastiche has been defined by Fredric Jameson as an imitation of a strange style and contrasted to the concept of postmodern parody. This article indicates that theory of pastiche can be applied on both the form and content of three stories of the above mentioned novel. Keywords: Pastiche, Parody, Depthlessness, Historicity 1. Introduction Paul Benjamin Auster (1947) is one of the most influential American postmodern authors, whose works mostly mix realism, experimentation, sociology, absurdism, existentialism and crime fiction. Pastiche, intertextuality, aesthetic dignity and Auster’s own appearance in his works, such as City of Glass (1985), are also some of the features of his works. The search for identity and self-discovery can be found in his works such as The New York Trilogy (2015)1, Moon Palace (1989), The Music of Chance (1990), The Book of Illusions (2002), and The Brooklyn Follies (2005).
    [Show full text]
  • AN INTRODUCTION to INTERTEXTUALITY AS a LITERARY THEORY: DEFINITIONS, AXIOMS and the ORIGINATORS Mevlüde ZENGİN∗ “The Good of a Book Lies in Its Being Read
    Pamukkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi Sayı 25/1, 2016, Sayfa 299-326 AN INTRODUCTION TO INTERTEXTUALITY AS A LITERARY THEORY: DEFINITIONS, AXIOMS AND THE ORIGINATORS Mevlüde ZENGİN∗ “The good of a book lies in its being read. A book is made up of signs that speak of other signs, which in their turn speak of things. Without an eye to read them, a book contains signs that produce no concepts; therefore it is dumb.” Umberto Eco, The Name of the Rose Abstract The aim of this study is to provide a succinct discussion of intertextuality from a theoretical perspective. The concept of intertextuality dates back to the ancient times when the first human history and the discourses about texts began to exist. As a phenomenon it has sometimes been defined as a set of relations which a text has with other texts and/or discourses belonging to various fields and cultural domains. Yet the commencement of intertextuality as a critical theory and an approach to texts was provided by the formulations of such theorists as Ferdinand de Saussure, Mikhail Bakhtin and Roland Barthes before the term ‘intertextuality’ was coined by Julia Kristeva in 1966. This study, focusing on firstly, the path from ‘work’ to ‘text’ and ‘intertext’, both of which ultimately became synonymous, and secondly, the shifting position of the reader/interpreter becoming significant in the discipline of literary studies, aims to define intertextuality as a critical theory and state its fundamentals and axioms formulated by the mentioned originators of the intertextual theory and thus to betray the fact that intertextuality had a poststructuralist and postmodern vein at the outset.
    [Show full text]
  • Rethinking Pauline Hopkins
    Rethinking Pauline Hopkins: Plagiarism, Appropriation, and African American Cultural Production Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/alh/article/30/4/e3/5099108 by guest on 29 September 2021 Introduction, pp. e4–e8 By Richard Yarborough The Practice of Plagiarism in a Changing Context pp. e9–e13 By JoAnn Pavletich Black Livingstone: Pauline Hopkins, Of One Blood, and the Archives of Colonialism, pp. e14–e20 By Ira Dworkin Appropriating Tropes of Womanhood and Literary Passing in Pauline Hopkins’s Hagar’s Daughter, pp. e21–e27 By Lauren Dembowitz Introduction Richard Yarborough* Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/alh/article/30/4/e3/5099108 by guest on 29 September 2021 I recall first encountering Pauline Hopkins in graduate school in the mid-1970s. Conducting research on her work entailed tolerat- ing the eyestrain brought on by microfilm and barely legible photo- copies of the Colored American Magazine. I also vividly remember the appearance of the 1978 reprint edition of her novel Contending Forces (1900) in Southern Illinois University Press’s Lost American Fiction series. I experienced both gratification at the long-overdue attention the novel was garnering and also no little distress upon reading Gwendolyn Brooks’s afterword to the text. While acknowl- edging our “inevitable indebtedness” to Hopkins, Brooks renders this brutal judgment: “Often doth the brainwashed slave revere the modes and idolatries of the master. And Pauline Hopkins consis- tently proves herself a continuing slave, despite little bursts of righ- teous heat, throughout Contending Forces” (409, 404–405). This view of the novel as a limited, compromised achievement reflects the all-too-common lack at the time of a nuanced, informed engage- ment with much post-Reconstruction African American literature broadly and with that produced by African American women in particular.
    [Show full text]
  • Double-Edged Imitation
    Double-Edged Imitation Theories and Practices of Pastiche in Literature Sanna Nyqvist University of Helsinki 2010 © Sanna Nyqvist 2010 ISBN 978-952-92-6970-9 Nord Print Oy Helsinki 2010 Acknowledgements Among the great pleasures of bringing a project like this to com- pletion is the opportunity to declare my gratitude to the many people who have made it possible and, moreover, enjoyable and instructive. My supervisor, Professor H.K. Riikonen has accorded me generous academic freedom, as well as unfailing support when- ever I have needed it. His belief in the merits of this book has been a source of inspiration and motivation. Professor Steven Connor and Professor Suzanne Keen were as thorough and care- ful pre-examiners as I could wish for and I am very grateful for their suggestions and advice. I have been privileged to conduct my work for four years in the Finnish Graduate School of Literary Studies under the direc- torship of Professor Bo Pettersson. He and the Graduate School’s Post-Doctoral Researcher Harri Veivo not only offered insightful and careful comments on my papers, but equally importantly cre- ated a friendly and encouraging atmosphere in the Graduate School seminars. I thank my fellow post-graduate students – Dr. Juuso Aarnio, Dr. Ulrika Gustafsson, Dr. Mari Hatavara, Dr. Saija Isomaa, Mikko Kallionsivu, Toni Lahtinen, Hanna Meretoja, Dr. Outi Oja, Dr. Merja Polvinen, Dr. Riikka Rossi, Dr. Hanna Ruutu, Juho-Antti Tuhkanen and Jussi Willman – for their feed- back and collegial support. The rush to meet the seminar deadline was always amply compensated by the discussions in the seminar itself, and afterwards over a glass of wine.
    [Show full text]
  • Translating Intertextuality As Intercultural Communication a Case Study" (2018)
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by The Open Repository @Binghamton (The ORB) Binghamton University The Open Repository @ Binghamton (The ORB) Graduate Dissertations and Theses Dissertations, Theses and Capstones 8-2018 TRANSLATING INTERTEXTUALITY AS INTERCULTURAL OMMUNICC ATION A CASE STUDY Bassam M. Al Saideen Binghamton University--SUNY, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://orb.binghamton.edu/dissertation_and_theses Recommended Citation Al Saideen, Bassam M., "TRANSLATING INTERTEXTUALITY AS INTERCULTURAL COMMUNICATION A CASE STUDY" (2018). Graduate Dissertations and Theses. 85. https://orb.binghamton.edu/dissertation_and_theses/85 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Dissertations, Theses and Capstones at The Open Repository @ Binghamton (The ORB). It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of The Open Repository @ Binghamton (The ORB). For more information, please contact [email protected]. TRANSLATING INTERTEXTUALITY AS INTERCULTURAL COMMUNICATION A CASE STUDY BY BASSAM M AL SAIDEEN BA, Yarmouk University, 1990 MA, Yarmouk University, 1997 DISSERTATION Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Translation Studies in the Graduate School of Binghamton University State University of New York 2018 © Copyright by Bassam Al Saideen 2018 All Rights Reserved Accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor
    [Show full text]