DOCSLIB.ORG

Appendix Fourteen

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Appendix Fourteen APPENDIX FOURTEEN Future Wellington – Proud, Prosperous and Resilient, Report of the Wellington Region Local Government Review Panel. Future Wellington – Proud, Prosperous and Resilient Rt Hon. Sir Geoffrey Palmer SC (Chair), Sue Driver, Sir Wira Gardiner, Bryan Jackson. October 2012 Contents 1. Vision – Proud, Prosperous and Resilient 4 2. Summary of Recommendations 6 3. Themes from Public Engagement 15 4. The Nature of the New Governance Model 36 5. Financial Governance and Management 57 6. Interacting with Local Government: Democracy, Participation and Engagement 80 7. Community and Social Infrastructure 87 8. Planning 95 9. Transport 110 10. Three Waters and Solid Waste 123 11. Economic Development 138 12. Efficiency in Service Delivery 148 13. Council Controlled Organisations 155 14. Appendices 175 1 The Panel’s Terms of Reference The Wellington Region Local Government Review Panel is an independent group set up by Greater Wellington Regional Council and Porirua City Council to examine existing local government arrangements in the Wellington region. The Panel has been asked to prepare a report that will: • Assess possible local government options for the Wellington region and identify an optimal one, which may include either structural and/or functional changes • Contain a description of the preferred model and how it would operate, including levels of decision making, functions, governance arrangements and a proposed approach to financial arrangements concerning rates/other revenue, debt and liability management • If the preferred option includes any changes, outline transition arrangements, including approximate costs and a timeframe for implementation The report may be used by the Greater Wellington Regional Council and Porirua City Council to form the basis of a submission for reorganisation to the Local Government Commission. In coming to its conclusions, the Panel will need to be satisfied that its recommendations meet the different needs of Wellington’s regional, rural and urban communities and will strengthen the ability of the region to meet future challenges. In particular, the Panel has been asked to consider: • Appropriate locations/levels for decisions on, and delivery of, local government functions • Institutional arrangements that will embed enhanced opportunities for community/ neighbourhood decision making on local issues and meaningful citizen engagement in the development of regional policy and delivery options • The role of local government in fostering cultural identity and community character • The role and representation of iwi/Mäori in the proposed model • Challenges faced by local government in delivering costly and complex infrastructure • The provision of local and regional facilities and amenities • Ways of enhancing the effectiveness and efficiency of planning and regulatory processes across the region • How best to achieve integrated planning, including for transport and land use, to deliver optimal economic and environmental outcomes • How changes in demographics will impact on the region and its constituent parts • The role of local government in assisting the region to be globally competitive • Ways in which the region’s local government could better align with central government and its agencies, for example health, education, and police • Ways in which the region’s local government could better align delivery with the private sector and the community/NGO sector • The impact of any proposed changes on local government finances and revenue models, including rates and the management of assets, debt and other liabilities 2 • Rationale and criteria for any Council Controlled Organisations and other models of arms-length service delivery • The costs and benefits of the status quo and of any preferred option for change • How and between which parties the financial costs of any transition should be apportioned • Any other issues the Panel consider relevant 3 1. Vision – Proud, Prosperous and Resilient 1. The Panel’s vision is for a prosperous and resilient Wellington region that stands out among its peers; a region that builds on its strengths and is acknowledged around the world as a place that has something special to offer. We think this is about: • Having an outstanding quality of life, full of opportunities for people to work, live and play • Being proud about the quality of place • A place where talent wants to live and people want to learn and innovate • Being proud to host Government and be the capital of New Zealand • Being highly connected socially as well as physically in all areas for all people 2. In coming to this vision, the Panel drew from the many thoughtful and passionate responses received through this process, including a submission from the New Zealand Council for Infrastructure Development (NZCID), which struck a chord with the Panel by providing an excellent summary of the challenges and opportunities facing the Wellington region. 1 3. To this effect, the Panel agrees with the NZCID that there is a lot that local government in Wellington can do to achieve this vision and ‘realise the potential of Wellington’. The activities and structures of local government play a major role in providing for the long- term prosperity and wellbeing of the Wellington regional community. For communities to flourish, they need to have the basic building blocks in place, including: • A resilient economy that retains and creates jobs • Social and cultural cohesiveness • Living environments that are safe, attractive and hold interest • Identity and a sense of place • A sustainable and healthy natural environment • Stable and effective government that is engaged with the community 4. The Wellington region has many of these building blocks and has long been characterised by the diversity of its communities and the strength of its culture, economy and people. There are challenges ahead that need to be addressed. 5. Economic growth has slowed, jobs are harder to find, technology is changing rapidly, we have an ageing population, and managing the environment - particularly water - is becoming more complex. We face an uncertain future in relation to climate change and natural hazards. From a political economy perspective, we are caught between two major centres of heavy economic activity - Auckland and Christchurch. The eye of central government is being drawn away from Wellington. We think Wellington’s relatively small size and New Zealand’s geographic isolation from global markets make the challenges substantial. 6. The Wellington region needs to keep up and adapt if it is to succeed. This applies to the region as a whole, but equally to the business of local government, which has been the focus of this review. 1 Submission #173 New Zealand Council for Infrastructure Development. 4 7. The Panel’s view, and of the many we met, was that the Wellington region seems to have lost its way in recent years. A decade ago, the Wellington region was recognised as being at the forefront of governance, vision and place – with new development initiatives including the Westpac Stadium, Wellington Waterfront, Te Papa, Pataka, the Dowse and Expressions. We had forward-thinking planning and urban design approaches - centre upgrades, award-winning village planning and main street upgrades. We saw new cultural events and innovative marketing - Martinborough wine, Absolutely Positively Wellington, the Sevens and the World of Wearable Art. There was the foundation of a new and exciting film industry in Miramar. Today, there is a feeling that the region is living on these past glories. 8. The Panel has the view that local government can, and needs to, do a lot more to ensure that optimal conditions again exist to enable the Wellington community to flourish. 9. The Panel believes that this vision cannot be achieved under the current arrangements for local government in the Wellington region. Delivering on this vision relies on governance structures that provide: • Unified regional leadership on strategic issues and local leadership on local issues • A clearly articulated strategy for the entire Wellington region, backed up with place- based responses for local places • An efficient and effective administration with serious implementation capability and expertise • Inclusive democratic structures and processes • World-class social, cultural and physical infrastructure 5 2. Summary of Recommendations The task and the method 10. The Independent Wellington Region Local Government Review Panel has been established to assess governance models for the Wellington Region and identify an optimal one. It was a task about which the Panel was enthusiastic, even passionate. As greater Wellington residents we are all ardently committed to the region’s success. We are of the view that it has fallen behind and lost its way. But it can be re-born. 11. In order to arrive at our recommendations, which are unanimous, we have engaged in consultations with the units of local government and communities within the region on the basis of an 84-page Future Wellington Issues Paper that was published on 19 July 2012.2 12. We met with the Wellington City Council, the Porirua City Council, the Kapiti Coast District Council, the Hutt City Council, the Upper Hutt City Council, the Masterton District Council, the Carterton District Council, the South Wairarapa District Council and the Greater Wellington Regional Council. We have conducted nine public meetings that were well attended. We received 234 submissions from members of the public. We were
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Mixed Member Proportional Representation System and Minority Representation
    The Mixed Member Proportional Representation System and Minority Representation: A Case Study of Women and Māori in New Zealand (1996-2011) by Tracy-Ann Johnson-Myers MSc. Government (University of the West Indies) 2008 B.A. History and Political Science (University of the West Indies) 2006 A Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Interdisciplinary Studies In the Graduate Academic Unit of the School of Graduate Studies Supervisor: Joanna Everitt, PhD, Dept. of History and Politics Examining Board: Emery Hyslop-Margison, PhD, Faculty of Education, Chair Paul Howe, PhD, Dept. of Political Science Lee Chalmers, PhD, Dept. of Sociology External Examiner: Karen Bird, PhD, Dept. of Political Science McMaster University This dissertation is accepted by the Dean of Graduate Studies THE UNIVERSITY OF NEW BRUNSWICK April, 2013 © Tracy-Ann Johnson-Myers, 2013 ABSTRACT This dissertation examines the relationship between women and Māori descriptive and substantive representation in New Zealand’s House of Representatives as a result of the Mixed Member Proportional electoral system. The Mixed Member Proportional electoral system was adopted in New Zealand in 1996 to change the homogenous nature of the New Zealand legislative assembly. As a proportional representation system, MMP ensures that voters’ preferences are proportionally reflected in the party composition of Parliament. Since 1996, women and Māori (and other minority and underrepresented groups) have been experiencing significant increases in their numbers in parliament. Despite these increases, there remains the question of whether or not representatives who ‘stand for’ these two groups due to shared characteristics will subsequently ‘act for’ them through their political behaviour and attitudes.
    [Show full text]
  • Register of Pecuniary Interests of Members of Parliament: Summary of Annual Returns As at 31 January 2009
    J. 7 Register of Pecuniary Interests of Members of Parliament: Summary of annual returns as at 31 January 2009 Forty-ninth Parliament Presented to the House of Representatives pursuant to Appendix B of the Standing Orders of the House of Representatives REGISTER OF PECUNIARY INTERESTS OF MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT: SUMMARY OF ANNUAL RETURNS J. 7 2 REGISTER OF PECUNIARY INTERESTS OF MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT: SUMMARY OF ANNUAL RETURNS J. 7 MISTER SPEAKER I have the honour to provide to you, pursuant to clause 16(3) of Appendix B of the Standing Orders of the House of Representatives, a copy of the summary booklet containing a fair and accurate description of the information contained in the Register of Pecuniary Interests of Members of Parliament, as at 31 January 2009. Dame Margaret Bazley DNZM, Hon DLit Registrar of Pecuniary Interests of Members of Parliament 3 REGISTER OF PECUNIARY INTERESTS OF MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT: SUMMARY OF ANNUAL RETURNS J. 7 Introduction Since 2005 Standing Orders have provided a system for members of Parliament to register their pecuniary interests, such as the assets, debts and gifts they may each have accumulated or received. It provides a protection against arguments that a possible conflict might arise between a member’s public duty and private interests. If certain things are made known and registered, concerns regarding conflicts of interest can be minimised. The requirements are set out in Standing Order 159 and Appendix B of the Standing Orders of the House of Representatives. It is a register designed to protect members in the event of scrutiny, rather than being a recital of wealth and indebtedness.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 16 AJHR 50 Parliament.Pdf
    APPENDIX TO THE JOURNALS OF THE House of Representatives OF NEW ZEALAND 2011–2014 VOL. 16 J—PAPERS RELATING TO THE BUSINESS OF THE HOUSE IN THE REIGN OF HER MAJESTY QUEEN ELIZABETH THE SECOND Being the Fiftieth Parliament of New Zealand 0110–3407 WELLINGTON, NEW ZEALAND: Published under the authority of the House of Representatives—2015 ARRANGEMENT OF THE PAPERS _______________ I—Reports and proceedings of select committees VOL. 1 Reports of the Education and Science Committee Reports of the Finance and Expenditure Committee Reports of the Government Administration Committee VOL. 2 Reports of the Health Committee Report of the Justice and Electoral Committee Reports of the Māori Affairs Committee Reports of the Social Services Committee Reports of the Officers of Parliament Committee Reports of the Regulations Review Committee VOL. 3 Reports of the Regulations Review Committee Reports of the Privileges Committee Report of the Standing Orders Committee VOL. 4 Reports of select committees on the 2012/13 Estimates VOL. 5 Reports of select committees on the 2013/14 Estimates VOL. 6 Reports of select committees on the 2014/15 Estimates Reports of select committees on the 2010/11 financial reviews of Government departments, Offices of Parliament, and reports on non-departmental appropriations VOL. 7 Reports of select committees on the 2011/12 financial reviews of Government departments, Offices of Parliament, and reports on non-departmental appropriations Reports of select committees on the 2012/13 financial reviews of Government departments, Offices of Parliament, and reports on non-departmental appropriations VOL. 8 Reports of select committees on the 2010/11 financial reviews of Crown entities, public organisations, and State enterprises VOL.
    [Show full text]
  • Women Talking Politics
    Women Talking Politics A research magazine of the NZPSA New Zealand Political Studies Association Te Kāhui Tātai Tōrangapū o Aotearoa November 2018 ISSN: 1175-1542 wtp Contents From the editors .............................................................................................................................. 4 New Zealand women political leaders today ................................ 6 Claire Timperley - Jacinda Ardern: A Transformational Leader? ............................................. 6 Jean Drage - New Zealand’s new women MPs discuss their first year in Parliament ............. 12 The 148 Women in New Zealand’s Parliament, 1933 – 2018 ................................................. 21 Articles .............................................................................................................................. 25 Julie MacArthur & Noelle Dumo - Empowering Women’s Work? Analysing the Role of Women in New Zealand’s Energy Sector ............................................................................... 25 Igiebor Oluwakemi - Informal Practices and Women’s Progression to Academic Leadership Positions in Nigeria ................................................................................................................ 31 Gay Marie Francisco - The Philippines’ ‘Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity or Expression Equality’ Bill: Who Represents the LGBTQ? ........................................................ 33 Emily Beausoleil - Gathering at the Gate: Listening Intergenerationally as a Precursor to
    [Show full text]
  • House of Representatives
    APPENDIX TO THE JOURNALS OF THE House of Representatives OF NEW ZEALAND 2011–2014 VOL. 3 I—REPORTS AND PROCEEDINGS OF SELECT COMMITTEES IN THE REIGN OF HER MAJESTY QUEEN ELIZABETH THE SECOND Being the Fiftieth Parliament of New Zealand 0110–3407 WELLINGTON, NEW ZEALAND: Published under the authority of the House of Representatives—2015 ARRANGEMENT OF THE PAPERS _______________ I—Reports and proceedings of select committees VOL. 1 Reports of the Education and Science Committee Reports of the Finance and Expenditure Committee Reports of the Government Administration Committee VOL. 2 Reports of the Health Committee Report of the Justice and Electoral Committee Reports of the Māori Affairs Committee Reports of the Social Services Committee Reports of the Officers of Parliament Committee Reports of the Regulations Review Committee VOL. 3 Reports of the Regulations Review Committee Reports of the Privileges Committee Report of the Standing Orders Committee VOL. 4 Reports of select committees on the 2012/13 Estimates VOL. 5 Reports of select committees on the 2013/14 Estimates VOL. 6 Reports of select committees on the 2014/15 Estimates Reports of select committees on the 2010/11 financial reviews of Government departments, Offices of Parliament, and reports on non-departmental appropriations VOL. 7 Reports of select committees on the 2011/12 financial reviews of Government departments, Offices of Parliament, and reports on non-departmental appropriations Reports of select committees on the 2012/13 financial reviews of Government departments, Offices of Parliament, and reports on non-departmental appropriations VOL. 8 Reports of select committees on the 2010/11 financial reviews of Crown entities, public organisations, and State enterprises VOL.
    [Show full text]
  • Today at a Special Caucus Meeting, Member Of
    26 November – 2 December The free news source you can write! Page 1 John Key new leader of New past," Mr Key said. Non-Government Parties. His select Zealand National Party committee responsibility is Security November 27, 2006 Mr English had supported Mr Key as long as he was promised the position and Intelligence. Today at a special caucus meeting, of deputy. Since 1999 when New Zealand Labour member of parliaments (MP) for Murray McCully, strategy manager, Party took power, National has had National agreed that the new leader of met Mr English, Mr Key and Simon four leaders which has given an image the opposition, New Zealand's Power, supporter of Mr English, in to the public of instability. Mr Key is National Party, is John Key and the Auckland where they discussed and the fifth leader. deputy leader is Bill English. They are finalised the takeover of the party. Mr English will now be the finance taking over from past leader, Dr Don Mr Key said: "...It was critical that we spokesman taking over from Mr Key. Brash and past deputy leader, Gerry proved we can manage ourselves. If Brownlee. Eden Park to be upgraded for we do that successfully then we can New Zealand's Rugby World Dr Brash quit last week as he thought earn the right to manage the country. Cup he was damaging the image of the People definitely took the view they November 27, 2006 National Party and Gerry Brownlee were putting the party before didn't seek leadership or to continue themselves." The New Zealand Government has being the deputy.
    [Show full text]
  • 100891 Marriage 6 Pager.FH11
    21 great reasons to keep marriage as is. HELP US FIND 21+ MORE POLITICIANS WHO WILL STAND FOR MARRIAGE 1. MARRIAGE IS FOUNDATIONAL 4. DEFINITION, NOT DISCRIMINATION Throughout history and in virtually all human societies, marriage has It is perfectly possible to support natural always been a union between men and women. Marriage predates The issue is one marriage while also recognising and respecting both the organised church and the state. The State should not presume of definition, not the rights of others. Changing the law so that to re-engineer a natural human institution. discrimination. marriage includes same-sex unions would be a massive change to what marriage means. 2. BIOLOGY, NOT BIGOTRY The issue is one of definition, not discrimination. Marriage combines the complementary characteristics of men and women as defined by nature. Nature is exclusive and discriminatory 5. EQUALITY IS NOT SAMENESS in that only the union of a man and a woman can produce another Equality is not sameness, and difference is not inequality. As popular life. It makes sense to treat something so unique in a unique way. NZ Herald columnist Jim Hopkins wrote: "(Discrimination) happens all the time. If equality was Parliament's objective, there'd be no minimum 3. FOR MARRIAGE, NOT AGAINST PEOPLE drinking age, no ban on bigamy or specified drugs, no requirement to This debate is not a discussion about pass a test to get a driver's licence and no Maori seats either." whether homosexuals are good Everyone has a right to people or not. Every human being love whom they choose, 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 5 AJHR 50 Parliament.Pdf
    APPENDIX TO THE JOURNALS OF THE House of Representatives OF NEW ZEALAND 2011–2014 VOL. 5 I—REPORTS AND PROCEEDINGS OF SELECT COMMITTEES IN THE REIGN OF HER MAJESTY QUEEN ELIZABETH THE SECOND Being the Fiftieth Parliament of New Zealand 0110–3407 WELLINGTON, NEW ZEALAND: Published under the authority of the House of Representatives—2015 ARRANGEMENT OF THE PAPERS _______________ I—Reports and proceedings of select committees VOL. 1 Reports of the Education and Science Committee Reports of the Finance and Expenditure Committee Reports of the Government Administration Committee VOL. 2 Reports of the Health Committee Report of the Justice and Electoral Committee Reports of the Māori Affairs Committee Reports of the Social Services Committee Reports of the Officers of Parliament Committee Reports of the Regulations Review Committee VOL. 3 Reports of the Regulations Review Committee Reports of the Privileges Committee Report of the Standing Orders Committee VOL. 4 Reports of select committees on the 2012/13 Estimates VOL. 5 Reports of select committees on the 2013/14 Estimates VOL. 6 Reports of select committees on the 2014/15 Estimates Reports of select committees on the 2010/11 financial reviews of Government departments, Offices of Parliament, and reports on non-departmental appropriations VOL. 7 Reports of select committees on the 2011/12 financial reviews of Government departments, Offices of Parliament, and reports on non-departmental appropriations Reports of select committees on the 2012/13 financial reviews of Government departments, Offices of Parliament, and reports on non-departmental appropriations VOL. 8 Reports of select committees on the 2010/11 financial reviews of Crown entities, public organisations, and State enterprises VOL.
    [Show full text]
  • Spring (October) 05
    NEWSLETTER OF THE AOTEAROA/NEW ZEALAND WOMEN AND POLITICS NETWORK Spring, 2005 New Series Issue No. 4 ISSN: 1175–1542 On the Campaign Trail: Candidates’ In planning for this edition of the Reflections on Election 2005 newsletter, it seemed an obvious choice Judith Collins (National) p 2 to focus on the 2005 general election. Heather Roy (Act) p 3 But I hadn’t counted on the campaign, Metiria Turei (Greens) p 3 election and coalition building being so exciting (is that the right word?) Neither Dianne Yates (Labour) p 4 had I counted on such an overwhelming response from candidates and Women and the 2005 General Election commentators to contribute their Jean Drage p 5 experience and ideas to the newsletter to produce this fascinating account of the The 2005 Gender Imbalance events, and expert analysis of the Claire Robinson and Amy Revell p 8 outcomes. I am, as always, grateful to those who have willingly given their time A Gendered Campaign? Media and expertise. I hope you, the reader, Coverage of the 2005 Election Heather Devere and Sharyn Graham p 9 enjoy the results! Women and the Election: Policies and Best wishes for the holiday season, and I look forward to bringing you further Perceptions Elizabeth McLeay and Margie Comrie p 11 editions in 2006. Conference report: Network for Janine Hayward European Women’s Rights [email protected] Rae Nicholl p 13 Political Studies University of Otago Book Review: My Life, David Lange Rae Nicholl p 15 On saying less than we know A common practice of political science journals, including even feminist political science journals such as the International Feminist Journal of Politics is to require referencing styles that obscure the gender (and in some cases the ethnicity) of authors.
    [Show full text]
  • 2011 Summary of Register of Pecuniary and Other Specified …
    J. 7 Register of Pecuniary and Other Specified Interests of Members of Parliament: Summary of annual returns as at 31 January 2011 Forty-ninth Parliament Presented to the House of Representatives pursuant to Appendix B of the Standing Orders of the House of Representatives REGISTER OF PECUNIARY AND OTHER SPECIFIED INTERESTS OF MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT: SUMMARY OF ANNUAL RETURNS J. 7 2 REGISTER OF PECUNIARY AND OTHER SPECIFIED INTERESTS OF MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT: SUMMARY OF ANNUAL RETURNS J. 7 MISTER SPEAKER I have the honour to provide to you, pursuant to clause 16(3) of Appendix B of the Standing Orders of the House of Representatives, a copy of the summary booklet containing a fair and accurate description of the information contained in the Register of Pecuniary and Other Specified Interests of Members of Parliament, as at 31 January 2011. Dame Margaret Bazley DNZM, Hon DLit Registrar of Pecuniary and Other Specified Interests of Members of Parliament 3 REGISTER OF PECUNIARY AND OTHER SPECIFIED INTERESTS OF MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT: SUMMARY OF ANNUAL RETURNS J. 7 Introduction Since 2006, members of Parliament have been required to register certain personal interests in 13 categories set out in clauses 4 to 7 of Appendix B of the Standing Orders of the House of Representatives. These are listed below. Items 1 to 9 require a ‘snapshot’ of interests as at 31 January 2011. Items 10 to 13 cover the period from the member’s previous return, or from their election to Parliament, until 31 January 2011. This booklet summarises the information provided in members’ returns in respect of any of the categories below.
    [Show full text]
  • Future Wellington – Proud, Prosperous and Resilient
    Future Wellington – Proud, Prosperous and Resilient Rt Hon. Sir Geoffrey Palmer SC (Chair), Sue Driver, Sir Wira Gardiner, Bryan Jackson. October 2012 Contents 1. Vision – Proud, Prosperous and Resilient 4 2. Summary of Recommendations 6 3. Themes from Public Engagement 15 4. The Nature of the New Governance Model 36 5. Financial Governance and Management 57 6. Interacting with Local Government: Democracy, Participation and Engagement 80 7. Community and Social Infrastructure 87 8. Planning 95 9. Transport 110 10. Three Waters and Solid Waste 123 11. Economic Development 138 12. Efficiency in Service Delivery 148 13. Council Controlled Organisations 155 14. Appendices 175 1 The Panel’s Terms of Reference The Wellington Region Local Government Review Panel is an independent group set up by Greater Wellington Regional Council and Porirua City Council to examine existing local government arrangements in the Wellington region. The Panel has been asked to prepare a report that will: • Assess possible local government options for the Wellington region and identify an optimal one, which may include either structural and/or functional changes • Contain a description of the preferred model and how it would operate, including levels of decision making, functions, governance arrangements and a proposed approach to financial arrangements concerning rates/other revenue, debt and liability management • If the preferred option includes any changes, outline transition arrangements, including approximate costs and a timeframe for implementation The report may be used by the Greater Wellington Regional Council and Porirua City Council to form the basis of a submission for reorganisation to the Local Government Commission. In coming to its conclusions, the Panel will need to be satisfied that its recommendations meet the different needs of Wellington’s regional, rural and urban communities and will strengthen the ability of the region to meet future challenges.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 7 AJHR 50 Parliament.Pdf
    APPENDIX TO THE JOURNALS OF THE House of Representatives OF NEW ZEALAND 2011–2014 VOL. 7 I—REPORTS AND PROCEEDINGS OF SELECT COMMITTEES IN THE REIGN OF HER MAJESTY QUEEN ELIZABETH THE SECOND Being the Fiftieth Parliament of New Zealand 0110–3407 WELLINGTON, NEW ZEALAND: Published under the authority of the House of Representatives—2015 ARRANGEMENT OF THE PAPERS _______________ I—Reports and proceedings of select committees VOL. 1 Reports of the Education and Science Committee Reports of the Finance and Expenditure Committee Reports of the Government Administration Committee VOL. 2 Reports of the Health Committee Report of the Justice and Electoral Committee Reports of the Māori Affairs Committee Reports of the Social Services Committee Reports of the Officers of Parliament Committee Reports of the Regulations Review Committee VOL. 3 Reports of the Regulations Review Committee Reports of the Privileges Committee Report of the Standing Orders Committee VOL. 4 Reports of select committees on the 2012/13 Estimates VOL. 5 Reports of select committees on the 2013/14 Estimates VOL. 6 Reports of select committees on the 2014/15 Estimates Reports of select committees on the 2010/11 financial reviews of Government departments, Offices of Parliament, and reports on non-departmental appropriations VOL. 7 Reports of select committees on the 2011/12 financial reviews of Government departments, Offices of Parliament, and reports on non-departmental appropriations Reports of select committees on the 2012/13 financial reviews of Government departments, Offices of Parliament, and reports on non-departmental appropriations VOL. 8 Reports of select committees on the 2010/11 financial reviews of Crown entities, public organisations, and State enterprises VOL.
    [Show full text]