Abstracts & Contact List

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Abstracts & Contact List Abstracts & Contact List 1 Great Lakes Waterfowl Symposium Primary Organization & Logistic Coordination: Long Point Waterfowl & Wetlands Research Fund Primary Sponsors: Canadian Wildlife Service - Environment Canada, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, & Ducks Unlimited Canada Additional Sponsors: Ducks Unlimited, Inc., Delta Waterfowl Foundation, Wildlife Habitat Canada / Wetland Habitat Fund, & Bird Studies Canada GLWS Organizing Committee: Long Point Waterfowl & Wetlands Research Fund Scott Petrie Shannon Badzinski Canadian Wildlife Service – Environment Canada Gary McCullough Norm North Paul Ashley Danny Bernard James Vanos Ducks Unlimited Canada Michel Gendron Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources Bruce Pollard GLWS Student Awards Committee: Michael Anderson Institute for Wetland & Waterfowl Research – DUC Ron Gatti Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources Ken Ross Canadian Wildlife Service – Environment Canada 2 Purpose of the Symposium The Great Lakes basin provides important staging, wintering, and breeding habitat for many species of ducks, geese and swans. The lakes and their associated habitats are not only spatially and temporally dynamic but are under constant threat from anthropogenic disturbances and introduction or proliferation of several exotic species. For these reasons, it is essential to increase our knowledge about the ecology, management, and threats facing waterfowl in the Great Lakes region. Presently, there are several government agencies, private organizations, and university researchers monitoring and studying waterfowl in and around the Great Lakes basin. However, collaboration among these parties could be improved, particularly across political boundaries. To promote communication, coordination, collaboration, and idea sharing among interested parties, the Long Point Waterfowl and Wetlands Research Fund, Canadian Wildlife Service - Environment Canada, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, and Ducks Unlimited decided to organize this Great Lakes Waterfowl Symposium. GLWS Participants List Because one of the primary purposes of GLWS is to foster idea sharing and collaboration among agencies and individuals, the GLWS Organizing Committee will post a list of GLWS participants on the LPWWRF website <http://www.bsc-eoc.org/lpbo/LPWWRF- GLWSymp.html> and will e-mail a copy to all registrants. 3 Abstracts of Oral Presentations Plenary Status of Waterfowl Science and Management Programs in United States and Canadian Universities Kaminski, Richard M. Department of Wildlife and Fisheries, Mississippi State University Mississippi State, MS 39762–9690, USA, [email protected] Since the time of Aldo Leopold, significant changes have occurred in science, management, and education related to wildlife and other natural resources. Historically, wildlife management focused on game animals. However, over 50 years ago, Aldo Leopold advocated sustaining ecosystems in his classic words: “To keep every cog and wheel is the first precaution of intelligent tinkering.” Although wildlife management today must focus on sustaining ecosystems, we should retain certain “cogs and wheels” that have been central and beneficial to wildlife science and conservation, human society, and the environment. In my opinion, these include waterfowl and the people who have helped sustain these valuable birds and their habitats. Because waterfowl are ecologically, environmentally, and economically important in North America, we should be aware of the possible impending decline in waterfowl scientists and educators in United States and Canadian universities. In 2000, I mailed a 2–page questionnaire to administrators in United States and Canadian universities (n = 76) to determine current and future status of waterfowl science and management programs in their institutions. Response rate was 93%, with 65% reporting they currently employed >1 faculty with expertise in waterfowl. Most (65%) of these faculty were >45 years of age (modal [24%] age class was 56–60 years). If these faculty would depart their positions, 63% of U.S. respondents but only 25% of Canadian respondents (53% combined) indicated they would seek another person with waterfowl expertise. Most would seek alternative specializations. I conclude that there is cause for concern regarding the possible waning of professionals with waterfowl expertise in North American universities. Professionals working with waterfowl and their habitats have significantly increased knowledge in the basic and applied sciences. As university faculty and administrators “tinker” with natural resource curricula and research programs, history has suggested that waterfowl professionals are “cogs and wheels” worth sustaining in North American universities. 4 Breeding Ecology Session Mallard Duckling Survival in the Great Lakes Region: Relationships with Hatch Date and Habitat Simpson, John W. University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, N1G 2W1, [email protected] Yerkes, Tina. Ducks Unlimited Inc., 331 Metty Drive, Ann Arbor, MI, 48103, [email protected] Habitat, in particular wetland habitat, may play a critical role in the growth, development, and survival of waterfowl young. Survival of waterfowl young is poorly understood, particularly in regions outside of the prairies, and little information exists regarding relationships between survival rates and habitat characteristics. We investigated the relationship between duckling survival rates, hatch date, and wetland and upland habitat covariates for 116 Mallard (Anas platyrhynchos) broods in the Great Lakes region from 2001 to 2003. Duckling survival rates increased rapidly with duckling age, and the probability, on hatch day, that a duckling will survive to 55 days tended to be higher for later hatched ducklings. The probability of survival to 55 days was also positively related to the proportion of vegetated wetland area, negatively related to the proportion of forest cover, and negatively related to the amount of wetland edge in the brood rearing area. Duckling survival rates were not correlated with the length of overland travel, the proportion of grassland, or the proportion seasonal wetlands in the brood rearing area. Conservation efforts aimed at improving mallard duckling survival rates in the Great Lakes region should focus on creating and maintaining wetlands with dense emergent vegetation and should avoid forested areas when protecting or creating wetland habitat. 5 Breeding Ecology Session Mallard Breeding Ecology and Hydrophyte Communities in Managed Wetlands in New York Kaminski, Matthew R. SUNY-College of Environmental Science and Forestry, 1 Forestry Drive, Syracuse, NY 13210 USA; [email protected] Baldassarre, Guy A. SUNY-College of Environmental Science and Forestry, 1 Forestry Drive, Syracuse, NY 13210 USA; [email protected] The Oneida Lake Plain is an important ecoregion in the Atlantic Flyway for waterfowl, especially mallards (Anas platyrhynchos). This region was identified by the USDA’s Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) as a focal region for wetland restoration and needing assessment of waterfowl use. Therefore, we initiated a 2-year field study (2003-2004) on NRCS’s Wetland Reserve Program (WRP) lands to (1) estimate survival and reproductive performance of female mallards, (2) contrast habitat use between females that did and did not survive and reproduce successfully, (3) evaluate effect of early summer drawdown of WRP impoundments as a strategy to stimulate production of moist-soil and emergent vegetation, and (4) estimate and compare waterbird use of hydrologically manipulated and unmanipulated WRP wetlands in fall 2003 and spring and fall 2004. In spring 2003, we fitted 32 hen mallards with prong and suture transmitters to monitor them throughout the season. Generally, females nested initially in forested and emergent wetlands perhaps as a consequence of little residual grass cover due to snow compaction. However, most renesting attempts were in grasslands in growing- season vegetation. Additionally, raptors (e.g., great-horned owls [Bubo virginanus] and red- tailed hawks [Buteo jamaicensis]) were important predators of early nesting mallards. We manipulated water levels on 4 WRP impoundments in summer 2003 and conducted plant and waterfowl surveys in fall 2003. Summer drawdown resulted in nearly complete re-vegetation in the drawdown areas of wetlands by 8-10 annual or perennial species beneficial to waterfowl as food and cover. We estimated 50.85 ducks/ha on the 4 managed wetlands compared to 4.09 ducks/ha on 6 unmanaged wetlands, implying the potential value of periodic drawdowns to improve habitat quality of WRP wetlands for migrating and breeding waterfowl. 6 Breeding Ecology Session Furthering Our Understanding Mallard Breeding Ecology to Enhance DUC Conservation Programs in Southern Ontario Gendron, Michel. Ducks Unlimited Canada, Unit 1-614 Norris Court, Kingston, ON K7P 2R9 [email protected] Gabor, Shane T. Institute for wetland and waterfowl research, Ducks Unlimited Canada, PO Box 1160, Stonewall, MB R0C 2Z0 [email protected] Ducks Unlimited Canada continually uses new knowledge to improve the performance of its conservation programs and to allow predictions of waterfowl response from other initiatives or programs that may influence the status of wetland habitats in southern Ontario. During an important recent science planning exercise among DUC staff, specific information needs were identified and prioritized to refine our conservation efforts. In particular, knowledge gaps specific to waterfowl habitat
Recommended publications
  • The Chatham-Kent Municipal Heritage Register
    THE CHATHAM-KENT MUNICIPAL HERITAGE REGISTER Part I - Designated Properties Properties Designated under Part IV Of the Ontario Heritage Act King Street, Chatham, Circa 1923-1924 Photo Credit: H.J. Woodside / Library and Archives Canada / PA-016775 Community of Bothwell 320 Main Street North Date By-Law Passed: 18-Jun-1990 (By-law 532- 90) Historic Period and/or Date of Erection: circa 1915 Historical Significance: Bothwell Town Hall was designed by architect William Murray. It has served the community as a town hall, jail, council chambers, fire hall, library, and theatre. The theatre on the second floor is well preserved and illustrates the importance of the structure as a hub of social activity. Architectural Significance/Description: The structure is an outstanding example of Edwardian Classicism architecture. One of the original jail cells has been retained in the front portion of the dwelling. Contextual Significance: The building is a landmark in Bothwell. Legal Description: Plan 141, Lot 493 to 494 Additional Notes: 2 Community of Bothwell 514 Peter Street North Date By-Law Passed: 18-Jun-1990 (By-law 533- 90) Historic Period and/or Date of Erection: circa 1880 Historical Significance: St. Ignatius Church was designed by Tracy & Durand of London, Ontario. Architectural Significance/Description: The church is an excellent example of Gothic Revival architecture. It was constructed in polychromatic white and red brick, rarely found in Chatham- Kent. Contextual Significance: The church is an important landmark and a testament to Bothwell’s affluence during the oil boom. Legal Description: Plan 141, Lot 659 to 660 Additional Notes: 3 Community of Camden (Twp.) 29251 Uncle Toms Road Date By-Law Passed: 6-Jul-1990 (By-law 42-90) Historic Period and/or Date of Erection: circa 1845 Historical Significance: The Josiah Henson House is the main heritage home on this nationally significant historic site.
    [Show full text]
  • Official Road Map of Ontario
    4 Ipperwash 5 r Corbett e Corners 27 v Kettle Pt. Beach 21 i dc 18 19 20 hg 22 139 123 P R Harrin Northville a Grantonji24ji 28 83° 82° 10 rk 24 hi hg Ravenswood 18 ll C 24 hg 47 Uniondale 79 r. hg 59 hghg Clandeboye hgLucan 7 27 Medina Lakeside Thedford 21 hg hg 7 dc C.N.R. 25 Sylvan Parkhill hg R hg 9 6 6 20 Elginfield hg O 7 Ailsa Craig 119 hg hg 7 hg 7 M hg e ji N Lambton Shores Denfieldhg 23 16 E hg 4 d 31 12 9 17 w hg hg 27 16 Kintore 25 Forest dca hg Hi hg Bryanston cko hg Birr y hg hg hgr 6 28 R mn MICHIGAN U.S.A. y Nairn 20 hg 81 C hg ONTARIO CANADA hg Arkona A ble r Thorndale 7 30 hgusa Ilderton . X 21 Cr. 19 16 E hg 14 Brights hg hg Ballymote Fanshawe Point 11dc 12 hg 17 S 43°43° Grove Camlachie hgKeyser L. 2 hg . 28 Edward 13 9 79 hger 16 Cr Arva 27 Thamesford hg Port 7 Plympton-Wyoming iv E 20 hg hg Ing hghg R hg Huron 6 hg 30 Hickory hg 69 3 9 14 15 Warwick Coldstream O 9hg 9 34 22 Adelaide Corner LONDON 73 45 1 O O O 22 L rq O hg 22 Lobo Melrose hg hg O 22 25 10 hg 32 k . 11 Poplar 44 r 9 hg C.N.R. hgPu SarniahgMandauminOReece's 22 e 56 4 69 w hgDorchester43° e C 65 o Cors.
    [Show full text]
  • Phase 1 Geoscientific Desktop Preliminary Assessment of Potential
    Phase 1 Geoscientific Desktop Preliminary Assessment of Potential Suitability for Siting a Deep Geological Repository for Canada’s Used Nuclear Fuel MUNICIPALITIES OF ARRAN-ELDERSLIE, BROCKTON AND SOUTH BRUCE, TOWNSHIP OF HURON-KINLOSS AND TOWN OF SAUGEEN SHORES, ONTARIO APM-REP-06144-0108 JUNE 2014 This report has been prepared under contract to the NWMO. The report has been reviewed by the NWMO, but the views and conclusions are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of the NWMO. All copyright and intellectual property rights belong to the NWMO. For more information, please contact: Nuclear Waste Management Organization 22 St. Clair Avenue East, Sixth Floor Toronto, Ontario M4T 2S3 Canada Tel 416.934.9814 Toll Free 1.866.249.6966 Email [email protected] www.nwmo.ca Phase 1 Geoscientific Desktop Preliminary Assessment of Potential Suitability for Siting a Deep Geological Repository for Canada’s Used Nuclear Fuel Municipalities of Arran-Elderslie, Brockton and South Bruce, Township of Huron-Kinloss and Town of Saugeen Shores Revision: 0 (Final) Prepared for: Nuclear Waste Management Organization 22 ST. Clair Avenue East, 6th Floor Toronto, Ontario M4T 2S3 Prepared by: Document ID: Sed Sites_Main Report_ June 30_R0 NWMO Report Number: APM-REP-06144-0108 June 2014 Geoscientific Desktop Suitability Assessment Study Sedimentary Sites, Southern Ontario Final Report Phase 1 Geoscientific Desktop Preliminary Assessment of Potential Suitability for Siting a Deep Geological Repository for Canada’s Used Title: Nuclear Fuel,
    [Show full text]
  • Species at Risk Act
    Consultation on Amending the List of Species under the Species at Risk Act Terrestrial Species November 2011 Information contained in this publication or product may be reproduced, in part or in whole, and by any means, for personal or public non-commercial purposes, without charge or further permission, unless otherwise specified. You are asked to: Exercise due diligence in ensuring the accuracy of the materials reproduced; Indicate both the complete title of the materials reproduced, as well as the author organization; and Indicate that the reproduction is a copy of an official work that is published by the Government of Canada and that the reproduction has not been produced in affiliation with or with the endorsement of the Government of Canada. Commercial reproduction and distribution is prohibited except with written permission from the Government of Canada’s copyright administrator, Public Works and Government Services of Canada (PWGSC). For more information, please contact PWGSC at 613-996-6886 or at [email protected]. Cover photo credits: Olive Clubtail © Jim Johnson Peacock Vinyl Lichen © Timothy B. Wheeler Cerulean Warbler © Carl Savignac Title page photo credits: Background photo: Dune Tachinid Fly habitat © Sydney Cannings Foreground, large photo: Dwarf Lake Iris © Jessie M. Harris Small photos, left to right: Butler’s Gartersnake © Daniel W.A. Noble Hungerford’s Crawling Water Beetle © Steve Marshall Barn Swallow © Gordon Court Spring Salamander © David Green Available also on the Internet. ISSN: 1710-3029 Cat. no.: EN1-36/2011E-PDF © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, represented by the Minister of the Environment, 2011 Consultation on Amending the List of Species under the Species at Risk Act Terrestrial Species November 2011 Please submit your comments by February 8, 2012, for terrestrial species undergoing normal consultations and by November 8, 2012, for terrestrial species undergoing extended consultations.
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution of Fish Species at Risk
    Cape Chin Distribution of Fish Stokes River Species at Risk Chin Creek The Forty Hills Monument Corners White Bluff Grey Sauble Ira Lake Provincial Nature Reserve Park Whippoorwill Bay Cove of Cork Conservation Authority Lion's Head PoinMt cKay's Harbour Ira Lake Lions Head Provincial Nature Reserve Cape Croker Gun Point Benjamin's Point Lion's Head Barrier Island (Map 1 of 4) Baie GeorgiennGeeorgian Bay Geeshkaupikauhnssing Cliff Bruce Peninsula North Bay Swan Lake Drain Isthmus Bay Bruce Peninsula Bannister's Hill Lion's Head Harbour Makataewaukawauk Stokes River Barrow Bay Nayausheeng Cape Dundas Pine Tree Point Rush Cove The Little Prairie Garden Island Astrop's Hill Ferndale Melville Sound Partridge Point Little Lake Stokes Bay MacGregor Harbour Harbour Point Cape Croker Irish Harbour Jackson's Cove Ferguson Point Black Creek Centreville Old Woman's River Shute Point Shoal Cove Knife Islands Myles Bay Hopeness Cape Paulett Prairie PointThe Prairie Halfway Point Saxon Island Judges Creek Hope Bay Forest Provincial Nature Reserve Look About Bay Bruce Peninsula Georgian Bay McMaster PointParker Island Sydney Bay Bluff Clay Hills West Little Lake Hope Bay Hay Island Spry Dane Island Sydney Bay Jones Bluff Lyal Island Omeedjilawh Camp Kings Point Lake Edenhurst Cape Croker Park Little Port Elgin Cornet Point Kings Point Bluff South Point Huron Golden Island Gravelly Bay Griffith Island North Point Angle Ditch McIver Eastnor Swamp Coveney's Hill Little Pike Point Malcolm Bluff Patterson Cliffs Little Pike Bay Deepwater Point
    [Show full text]
  • October 2019 BPSA Reports
    October 2019 BPSA Reports Treasury Report for month of September, 2019 Treasurer – Corrie Beacock General account: Deposits $ 3,030.31 Expenses (1,423.50) Balance $34,597.45 Attached is list of expenditures and deposit. • Ways & Means balance is $4,528.09 • Deer feeding fund is $3,578.12. • RBG GIC Maturing December 1, 2022 is $25,000.00. • Total $67,703.66 9 8 Hydro One 403.53 Hatchery 9 5 Bank fee 8.50 Secretary 9 11 Storm Web 28.49 Web Hosting Murray Garniss - Fries Community 9 11 Living 62.12 Events 9 26 Community Living 48.20 Events Canadian Tire - prize Charles 9 26 Robinson 372.90 Events 9 26 OFAH Stu Patterson 121.90 OFAH 9 26 Longlands Appliances - Stove 789.89 Maintenance 9 3 interest 0.03 9 20 Bruce Trail invoice #110 3,030.25 10 1 0.03 3,030.31 1,423.50 BPSA MEMBERSHIP SUMMARY REVISON 2019 DATE SEPT 21/19 PAID NEW MEMBERS 73 PAID FAMILY MEMBERS 221 PAID YOUTH 3 TOTAL PAID MEMBERS 297 PAST MEMBERS NOT PAID 20 MEMBERS THAT GET MINUTES MAILED 8 PAID GUN CLUB MEMBERS 71 PAID ARCHERY MEMBERS 45 PAID ADULT MEMBERS 265 CHILDREN MEMBERS 32 ADULT QUORUM @10% IS 26.5 The new 2020 membership form is attached. Print and use or pick one up at the meeting. A google calendar is up and running in the members section of the website thanks to Kat. If your section has an event you want posted on the calendar contact Karen at [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 2: Watershed Characterization
    Approved Chapter 2 WATERSHED CHARACTERIZATION APPROVED ASSESSMENT REPORT for the Grey Sauble Source Protection Area October 15, 2015 Appendix E - Approved Assessment Report -- Grey Sauble Source Protection Area Approved This page intentionally left blank. Appendix E - Approved Assessment Report -- Grey Sauble Source Protection Area Approved APPROVED ASSESSMENT REPORT for the Grey Sauble Source Protection Area Table of Contents CHAPTER 2.0 WATERSHED CHARACTERIZATION 2.0 Watershed Characterization ......................................................................................... 2-1 2.1 Source Protection Region .............................................................................................. 2-1 2.2 Grey Sauble Source Protection Area ........................................................................... 2-1 2.2.1 Jurisdictions .......................................................................................................... 2-2 2.2.1.1 Conservation Authorities ......................................................................... 2-2 2.2.1.2 Municipalities .......................................................................................... 2-3 2.2.1.3 Provincial Ministries ................................................................................ 2-4 2.2.1.4 Federal Government................................................................................. 2-5 2.2.1.5 First Nations ............................................................................................. 2-5 2.2.2 Non-Governmental
    [Show full text]
  • Michigan-Phragmites-Symposium-Proceedings-Document-2011.Pdf
    [This page is intentionally left blank] Phragmites Invasions in Michigan: A Symposium to Build Capacity for Management East Lansing, Michigan ● March 28-30, 2011 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The proceedings document, Phragmites Invasions in Michigan: A Symposium to Build Capacity for Phragmites Management and Control, has been prepared as part of a Michigan Coastal Management Program (CMP) funded grant. The project has been conducted by the Great Lakes Commission project team that includes Thomas Crane (Deputy Director), Katherine Glassner‐Shwayder (Senior Project Manager), Erika Jensen (Senior Program Specialist), Heather Braun (Project Manager), Julie Hinderer (formerly employed as the 2010‐2011 Sea Grant Fellow) Stuart Eddy (Senior Project Manager), Devra Polack (Web Design and Communications Support), Laura Andrews (Design Manager) and Cassie Bradley (2011‐2012 Sea Grant Fellow). Critical to the success of this project has been the guidance provided by the Project Advisory Committee (PAT), including representatives from the Michigan departments of Natural Resources and Environmental Quality and the Michigan Natural Features Inventory (DNR, DEQ and MNFI). The Great Lakes Commission extends appreciation to the following members of the PAT: Sue Tangora (Wildlife Division, DNR), Phyllis Higman (Senior Conservation Scientist, MNFI), Emily Finnell (Office of the Great Lakes, DEQ), Anne Hokanson (Wetlands, Lakes and Streams Unit, DEQ), Sarah LeSage (Aquatic Biologist, DEQ), Matt Preisser (Office of the Great Lakes, DEQ), Kevin Walters (Wildlife Division, DNR) and Matt Ankney (Wildlife Division, DNR). Collectively, the PAT has been engaged in every aspect of this CMP project including planning and convening the project symposium; developing and conducting a questionnaire to assess phragmites management in the state of Michigan; and developing a strategic framework on phragmites management and control.
    [Show full text]
  • Best of the Bruce
    2017/2018 BEST OF THE BRUCE BRUCE COUNTY, ONTARIO BEST OF THE BRUCE 3 Explorers Welcome TABLE OF CONTENTS Find Yourself in Bruce County 4-5 Interior 46-57 In your hand is your ticket to explore Lucknow and Ripley 48-49 Peninsula 6-25 Walkerton and Area 50-51 Hike the path less traveled, breathe in gorgeous sunsets on sandy Tobermory 8-9 Paisley and Area 52-53 beaches, surge through forests on a bike or paddle in the Great Lion’s Head 10-11 Mountain Bike the Bruce 54-55 Lake! Bruce County is a place where children are encouraged to Wiarton 12-13 The Mighty Saugeen River 56-57 look under rocks, and parents help with the heavy lifting. Bruce Trail 14-15 Unique Experiences Abound in Bruce County MS Chi-Cheemaun 16-17 Visitor Information Centres 58 If you are scouting for hidden treasures, courting a cultural scene Scuba Diving and Snorkeling 18-19 or seeking an unmatchable camping experience, come unearth it Flowerpot Island 20-21 Festivals and Events 59 here. Your journey will be marked with inquiry and discovery. Dark Sky Astronomy 22-23 Plan your Journey Bouldering 24-25 Include some of the exclusive adventures available in our regions. Ideas for your shopping, dining and sleeping experiences and stellar Lakeshore 26-45 community activities are in this guide. Come… Sauble Beach 28-29 Southampton 30-31 Explore the “Best of” Bruce County Port Elgin 32-33 Kincardine 34-35 Kincardine Scottish Pipe Band Parade 36-37 Lighthouse Tours 38-39 Kiteboarding and Great Lakes Surfing 40-41 Kayaking in the Fishing Islands 42-43 Explore the Unforgettable 44-45 EXPLORETHEBRUCE.COM BEST OF THE BRUCE 5 Find Yourself in Bruce County Work / life - zero distance in between Starting a business in Bruce County is like setting up shop in a natural, entrepreneurial incubator.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 1 1 Introduction
    Watershed Characterization Report Thames Watershed & Region (Upper Thames River & Lower Thames Valley Source Protection Areas) Volume 1 1 Introduction 2 Watershed Description 2.1 Source Protection Region 2.2 Physical Description 2.3 Hydrology & Climate 2.4 Naturally Vegetated Areas 2.5 Aquatic Ecology 2.6 Human Characterization 2.7 Water Uses Volume 2 3 Water Quality 3.1 Selecting Indicator Parameters 3.2 Raw Water Characterization for Inland Surface Water 3.3 Groundwater Quality 3.4 Raw Water Characterization for Drinking Water Intakes 3.5 Data and Knowledge Gaps for Water Quality Volume 3 4 Water Quantity 4.1 Water Use 4.2 Data and Knowledge Gaps for Water Use 5 Description of Vulnerable Areas 5.1 Identification of Source Protection Areas 5.2 Groundwater: Aquifer Vulnerability, Wellhead Protection Areas & Potential Drinking Water Sources 5.3 Surface Water: Intake Protection Zones 6 Existing Drinking Water Threats Inventories 6.1 Threats to Water Quality 6.2 Known Water Quality Issues 6.3 Data and Knowledge Gaps for Existing Drinking Water Threats Inventories 7 Summary of Identified Issues and Concerns Appendices A: Data Gap Reporting B: List of Acronyms C: Significant Natural Areas and Wetlands (UTRCA) D: References Watershed Characterization Report – Thames Watershed & Region - Volume 1 i Thames Watershed & Region Maps Map 1: Thames-Sydenham & Region Source Protection Region Map 2: Major Subwatershed Delineations Map 3: Bedrock Topography Map 4: Bedrock Geology Map 5: Overburden Thickness Map 6: Surficial Geology Map 7: Physiography
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity Investment Areas: Nearshore Terrestrial Ecosystems
    State of the Lakes Ecosystem Conference 1998 BIODIVERSITY INVESTMENT AREAS Nearshore Terrestrial Ecosystems Version 3 Ron Reid Bobolink Enterprises Washago, Ontario Canada Karen Rodriguez U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Chicago, Illinois U.S.A. Amy Mysz U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Chicago, Illinois U.S.A. July 1999 State of the Lakes Ecosystem Conference 1998 BIODIVERSITY INVESTMENT AREAS Nearshore Terrestrial Ecosystems Version 3 Ron Reid Bobolink Enterprises Washago, Ontario Canada Karen Rodriguez U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Chicago, Illinois U.S.A. Amy Mysz U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Chicago, Illinois U.S.A. July 1999 Table of Contents 1. Introduction ..................................................................... 1 1.1 Definition and Limitations ................................................... 1 1.2 Addressing Other Sites ..................................................... 2 1.3 Current BIA Activities ...................................................... 3 1.4 Next Steps ............................................................... 4 1.5 Monitoring Progress ....................................................... 4 1.6 Report Format ............................................................ 5 2. Superior North .................................................................. 7 2.1 Ecological Features and Values ............................................... 7 2.2 Current Threats to Ecological Values .......................................... 9 2.3 Current Protection of Ecological Values
    [Show full text]
  • We Are Pleased to Approve the Sauble Falls Provincial Park Management Plan, As Official Policy for the Management and Development of This Park
    NOTE: This document has been scanned and formatted, and therefore is slightly different from the original version. -March 2002 We are pleased to approve the Sauble Falls Provincial Park Management Plan, as official policy for the management and development of this park. The plan reflects this Ministry’s intent to protect natural and cultural features of the Sauble Falls Provincial Park and maintain high quality opportunities for outdoor recreation and heritage appreciation for both residents of Ontario and visitors to the Province. Regional Director, Director, Parks and Southwestern Region Recreational Areas Branch TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE No. 1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Relationship to the Rankin Resources Management Area 1.2 Relationship to Sauble Beach 2.0 PARK POLICIES................................................................................................... 1 2.1 Classification 2.2 Goal 2.3 Objectives 2.3.1 Recreation 2.3.2 Heritage Appreciation 2.3.3 Tourism 2.4 Boundary 2.5 Zoning 3.0 RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ............................................................................... 5 3.1 Vegetation 3.2 Fisheries 3.3 Wildlife 4.0 CLIENT SERVICES .............................................................................................. 5 4.1 Visitor Services 4.1.1 Communications 4.1.2 Interpretation 4.1.3 Outdoor Recreation 4.1.4 Education 4.1.5 Staff Development 4.2 Research 4.3 Marketing 5.0 DEVELOPMENT..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]