Michigan-Phragmites-Symposium-Proceedings-Document-2011.Pdf

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Michigan-Phragmites-Symposium-Proceedings-Document-2011.Pdf [This page is intentionally left blank] Phragmites Invasions in Michigan: A Symposium to Build Capacity for Management East Lansing, Michigan ● March 28-30, 2011 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The proceedings document, Phragmites Invasions in Michigan: A Symposium to Build Capacity for Phragmites Management and Control, has been prepared as part of a Michigan Coastal Management Program (CMP) funded grant. The project has been conducted by the Great Lakes Commission project team that includes Thomas Crane (Deputy Director), Katherine Glassner‐Shwayder (Senior Project Manager), Erika Jensen (Senior Program Specialist), Heather Braun (Project Manager), Julie Hinderer (formerly employed as the 2010‐2011 Sea Grant Fellow) Stuart Eddy (Senior Project Manager), Devra Polack (Web Design and Communications Support), Laura Andrews (Design Manager) and Cassie Bradley (2011‐2012 Sea Grant Fellow). Critical to the success of this project has been the guidance provided by the Project Advisory Committee (PAT), including representatives from the Michigan departments of Natural Resources and Environmental Quality and the Michigan Natural Features Inventory (DNR, DEQ and MNFI). The Great Lakes Commission extends appreciation to the following members of the PAT: Sue Tangora (Wildlife Division, DNR), Phyllis Higman (Senior Conservation Scientist, MNFI), Emily Finnell (Office of the Great Lakes, DEQ), Anne Hokanson (Wetlands, Lakes and Streams Unit, DEQ), Sarah LeSage (Aquatic Biologist, DEQ), Matt Preisser (Office of the Great Lakes, DEQ), Kevin Walters (Wildlife Division, DNR) and Matt Ankney (Wildlife Division, DNR). Collectively, the PAT has been engaged in every aspect of this CMP project including planning and convening the project symposium; developing and conducting a questionnaire to assess phragmites management in the state of Michigan; and developing a strategic framework on phragmites management and control. This involvement has been tremendously helpful in efforts to ensure that project activities meet the needs of state resource managers to advance coordination of the management and control of phragmites in the state of Michigan. 2 | Page Phragmites Invasions in Michigan: A Symposium to Build Capacity for Management East Lansing, Michigan ● March 28-30, 2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS SYMPOSIUM AGENDA ................................................................................................................... 4 PLENARY SESSION FACILITATED QUESTIONS/ANCHOR POINTS ............................. 9 BREAKOUT SESSION FACILITATED QUESTIONS/ANCHOR POINTS ....................... 10 FIELD TRIP HIGHLIGHTS .............................................................................................................. 11 SYMPOSIUM PRESENTATION SUMMARIES...................................................................... 13 SYMPOSIUM BIOGRAPHIES ...................................................................................................... 25 SYMPOSIUM PARTICIPANTS .................................................................................................... 33 POSTER ABSTRACTS ..................................................................................................................... 40 Strategic Framework for the Management and Control of Invasive Phragmites in Michigan ............................................................................................................. 43 Symposium Draft: March 27, 2011 SYMPOSIUM SPEAKER PRESENTATIONS ........................................................................... 46 3 | Page Phragmites Invasions in Michigan: A Symposium to Build Capacity for Management East Lansing, Michigan ● March 28-30, 2011 SYMPOSIUM AGENDA Phragmites Invasions in Michigan: A Symposium to Build Capacity for Management March 28‐30, 2011 Kellogg Hotel & Conference Center East Lansing, Michigan Symposium Overview The Great Lakes Commission, in cooperation with the Michigan departments of Natural Resources and Environmental Quality, is pleased to present this symposium on management and control of the non‐native, invasive plant, Phragmites australis. The symposium features plenary sessions on current and future invasive phragmites management and control efforts and technologies. In addition, a series of breakout sessions are offered on topics including capacity building, policy and regulations, case studies in collaborative management, and distribution and mapping. The symposium is being held as part of a broader initiative to develop a strategic framework to advance coordinated phragmites management and control in Michigan with relevance to the Great Lakes region. See www.glc.org/ans/phragmites/symposium2011.html. Agenda Monday, March 28 12:45 – 4:30 p.m. Field Trip to Lake Lansing Park North Participants will learn how a local team of dedicated volunteers and stakeholders has banded together around a common threat: the invasion of non‐native phragmites. The goal of this experience is to gain a first‐hand, on the ground understanding of the ecological context of phragmites invasions in the park and the efforts underway to manage and control these invasions. Tuesday, March 29 8:00 a.m. Registration and Continental Breakfast 9:00 a.m. Welcoming Remarks Frank Ruswick, Deputy Director, Michigan Office of the Great Lakes Roger Eberhardt, Environmental Quality Specialist, Michigan Office of the Great Lakes Tim Eder, Executive Director, Great Lakes Commission (GLC) 9:25 a.m. Review of Agenda Kathe Glassner‐Shwayder, GLC 9:30 a.m. The Impacts and Challenges of Invasive Phragmites 4 | Page Phragmites Invasions in Michigan: A Symposium to Build Capacity for Management East Lansing, Michigan ● March 28-30, 2011 Background on invasive phragmites: definition/scope of problem, impacts, challenges Sue Tangora, Wildlife Division, Michigan Dept. of Natural Resources (DNR) Project overview featuring strategic framework as a symposium outcome Kathe Glassner‐Shwayder, GLC 10:15 a.m. BREAK 10:30 a.m. Panel: Current Invasive Phragmites Management and Control Efforts Moderator: Barb Avers, Wildlife Division, Michigan DNR Large scale management and control for large infestations Ray Fahlsing, State Park Stewardship Program, Michigan DNR Small scale management and control for rapid response Shaun Howard, The Nature Conservancy in Michigan Invasive phragmites management on roadsides and right‐of‐ways Bob Batt, Michigan Department of Transportation Invasive phragmites management in high‐quality natural communities Phyllis Higman, Michigan Natural Features Inventory 12:30 p.m. LUNCH 1:30 p.m. Introduction to Breakout Sessions Results of invasive phragmites management and control questionnaire Julie Hinderer, GLC 2:00 p.m. Breakout Sessions (2:00 – 3:30 p.m. and 3:45 – 5:15 p.m.) Tools for Success: Building Capacity to Implement Large‐scale Phragmites Management and Control Facilitator: Amy Derosier, Wildlife Division, Michigan DNR Recorder: Heather Braun, GLC This session will showcase successful regional efforts to build the capacity needed to implement large‐scale invasive phragmites management and control. Presenters will discuss their strategies and lessons learned on topics such as raising funds, securing technical assistance, garnering public and political support, designing projects and coordinating with partners. Building capacity for invasive phragmites management in the Grand Traverse region: Brian Piccolo, Wildlife Division, Michigan DNR Controlling invasive phragmites: Lessons learned on identifying projects, building partnerships and securing funding: Roy Kroll, Ducks Unlimited Regional early detection and rapid response campaign in northeast Michigan: Jennifer Muladore, Huron Pines 5 | Page Phragmites Invasions in Michigan: A Symposium to Build Capacity for Management East Lansing, Michigan ● March 28-30, 2011 The Role of Policy and Regulations in Invasive Phragmites Management and Control Facilitator: Steve Beyer, Wildlife Division, Michigan DNR Recorder: Erika Jensen, GLC This session will examine existing policies and regulations relevant to invasive phragmites management and control, including opportunities for increasing their effectiveness and public awareness to improve compliance. State prohibited and restricted invasive species laws: Mike Bryan, Michigan Dept. of Agriculture and Rural Development Permitting laws governing state waters: Water Resource Division, Michigan Dept. of Environmental Quality (DEQ) o Anne Hokanson, Wetlands Program (mechanical control permitting) o Eric Bacon, Aquatic Nuisance Control Program (herbicide permitting) County‐wide ordinances on treating phragmites infestations on private property: Dr. Grenetta Thomassey, Tip of the Mitt Watershed Council Who’s on First: Case Studies in Collaborative Management at the Local Level Facilitator: Mark Sargent, Wildlife Division, Michigan DNR Recorder: Julie Hinderer, GLC This session will feature examples of multiple stakeholders working together at the local level to prevent and control small‐scale invasive phragmites infestations. It will focus on the collaborative process, including building relationships, roles and responsibilities of partners, strategies for successful collaboration and lessons learned. Making collaboration work in implementing invasive phragmites control along Lake St. Clair: Bill Parkus, Southeast Michigan Council of Governments Stewardship approach in fighting phragmites invasions on Harsen’s Island: Bob Williams, Stewart Farm Successful collaboration of local governments, landowners, and the Michigan DNR in eradicating
Recommended publications
  • The Chatham-Kent Municipal Heritage Register
    THE CHATHAM-KENT MUNICIPAL HERITAGE REGISTER Part I - Designated Properties Properties Designated under Part IV Of the Ontario Heritage Act King Street, Chatham, Circa 1923-1924 Photo Credit: H.J. Woodside / Library and Archives Canada / PA-016775 Community of Bothwell 320 Main Street North Date By-Law Passed: 18-Jun-1990 (By-law 532- 90) Historic Period and/or Date of Erection: circa 1915 Historical Significance: Bothwell Town Hall was designed by architect William Murray. It has served the community as a town hall, jail, council chambers, fire hall, library, and theatre. The theatre on the second floor is well preserved and illustrates the importance of the structure as a hub of social activity. Architectural Significance/Description: The structure is an outstanding example of Edwardian Classicism architecture. One of the original jail cells has been retained in the front portion of the dwelling. Contextual Significance: The building is a landmark in Bothwell. Legal Description: Plan 141, Lot 493 to 494 Additional Notes: 2 Community of Bothwell 514 Peter Street North Date By-Law Passed: 18-Jun-1990 (By-law 533- 90) Historic Period and/or Date of Erection: circa 1880 Historical Significance: St. Ignatius Church was designed by Tracy & Durand of London, Ontario. Architectural Significance/Description: The church is an excellent example of Gothic Revival architecture. It was constructed in polychromatic white and red brick, rarely found in Chatham- Kent. Contextual Significance: The church is an important landmark and a testament to Bothwell’s affluence during the oil boom. Legal Description: Plan 141, Lot 659 to 660 Additional Notes: 3 Community of Camden (Twp.) 29251 Uncle Toms Road Date By-Law Passed: 6-Jul-1990 (By-law 42-90) Historic Period and/or Date of Erection: circa 1845 Historical Significance: The Josiah Henson House is the main heritage home on this nationally significant historic site.
    [Show full text]
  • Official Road Map of Ontario
    4 Ipperwash 5 r Corbett e Corners 27 v Kettle Pt. Beach 21 i dc 18 19 20 hg 22 139 123 P R Harrin Northville a Grantonji24ji 28 83° 82° 10 rk 24 hi hg Ravenswood 18 ll C 24 hg 47 Uniondale 79 r. hg 59 hghg Clandeboye hgLucan 7 27 Medina Lakeside Thedford 21 hg hg 7 dc C.N.R. 25 Sylvan Parkhill hg R hg 9 6 6 20 Elginfield hg O 7 Ailsa Craig 119 hg hg 7 hg 7 M hg e ji N Lambton Shores Denfieldhg 23 16 E hg 4 d 31 12 9 17 w hg hg 27 16 Kintore 25 Forest dca hg Hi hg Bryanston cko hg Birr y hg hg hgr 6 28 R mn MICHIGAN U.S.A. y Nairn 20 hg 81 C hg ONTARIO CANADA hg Arkona A ble r Thorndale 7 30 hgusa Ilderton . X 21 Cr. 19 16 E hg 14 Brights hg hg Ballymote Fanshawe Point 11dc 12 hg 17 S 43°43° Grove Camlachie hgKeyser L. 2 hg . 28 Edward 13 9 79 hger 16 Cr Arva 27 Thamesford hg Port 7 Plympton-Wyoming iv E 20 hg hg Ing hghg R hg Huron 6 hg 30 Hickory hg 69 3 9 14 15 Warwick Coldstream O 9hg 9 34 22 Adelaide Corner LONDON 73 45 1 O O O 22 L rq O hg 22 Lobo Melrose hg hg O 22 25 10 hg 32 k . 11 Poplar 44 r 9 hg C.N.R. hgPu SarniahgMandauminOReece's 22 e 56 4 69 w hgDorchester43° e C 65 o Cors.
    [Show full text]
  • Summer Events Guide Project1 Layoutbe a 1Tourist 4/1/19 10:44 in AM Your Page 1 Own Town, Margarita Fest, Jazz Fest, Fireworks and More
    A Newspaper for the rest of us • www.lansingcitypulse.com FREE May 29 - June 4, 2019 Summer Events Guide Project1_LayoutBe a 1Tourist 4/1/19 10:44 in AM Your Page 1 Own Town, Margarita Fest, Jazz Fest, fireworks and more ... See page 14 2 www.lansingcitypulse.com City Pulse • May 29, 2019 City Pulse • May 29, 2019 www.lansingcitypulse.com 3 Favorite Things THE EDGE OF THINGS: Lansing artist ERI VK and her DISSIDENT ART UNDER mannequin coffee table REPRESSIVE REGIMES Join us for the opening reception of The Edge of Things: Dissident Art Under Repressive Regimes, an exhibtion of experimental artworks made by artists from Argentina, Brazil, and Chile in resistence to Regina Vater, Mulher Mutante (Mutant Woman), 1968. oppresive social and Courtesy Galeria Jaqueline Martins. political conditions. MAY 31, 6–8pm I was a manager at American lot because I am an artist and am Apparel, which is now gone. When always having fun with the space. the store was closing, we got all Sometimes it is a coffee table. these cool mannequins. These were Sometimes I stack it on top of up along the walls on the shelves. another thing to have fun with it. 1 They used to model men’s under- I also use this shelf at art shows to JUNE wear like briefs. I guess I could exhibit my stuff. , . dress briefs on them now. I haven’t I would eventually like to get into Y P.M A O 5 thought about that before. set design or prop styling like this. D .
    [Show full text]
  • Great Lakes Commission Info Sheet
    lllinois Indiana Michigan Minnesota New York Ohio Pennsylvania Wisconsin Ontario Québec www.glc.org The Great Lakes The Great Lakes are an environmental and economic asset for the United States and Canada. The lakes fuel a $6 trillion regional economy and hold 90% of the U.S. supply of fresh surface water, providing drinking water for more than 40 million people. More than 1.5 million U.S. jobs are directly connected to the Great Lakes and those jobs generate $62 billion in wages annually. The Great Lakes Commission To ensure that this vital resource is protected, the The GLC provides the following core services to our member eight Great Lakes states created the Great Lakes states and provinces: 1) communications and outreach; Commission (GLC) in 1955 via the Great Lakes Basin 2) information management and delivery; 3) facilitation and Compact. In 1968, Congress provided its consent to the consensus building; 4) policy coordination and advocacy; and Compact and the interstate compact agency it created. 5) regional project management. We employ these services to carry out a variety of projects and activities in the areas of: The eight U.S. states and two Canadian provinces are represented on the GLC by a delegation of government- Water Quality appointed commissioners. The GLC recommends policies Water Use, Management and Infrastructure and practices to balance the use, development, and Commercial Navigation conservation of the water resources of the Great Lakes and Great Lakes Waterfront Community Revitalization and Economic Development brings the region together to work on issues that no single Coastal Conservation and Habitat Restoration community, state, province, or nation can tackle alone.
    [Show full text]
  • Great Lakes Compact Commission
    2018 Annual Report 1 Board of Directors John Linc Stine, Chair Commissioner, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Sharon Jackson, Vice Chair Deputy General Counsel, Office of the Governor of Indiana Jon W. Allan, Immediate Past Chair Director, Office of the Great Lakes, Michigan Department of Natural Resources Wayne A. Rosenthal Director, Illinois Department of Natural Resources Basil Seggos Commissioner, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation James Zehringer Director, Ohio Department of Natural Resources William Carr Senior Manager, Government of Ontario Office of International Relations and Policy Timothy J. Bruno Chief, Office of the Great Lakes, Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection Jean-François Hould Québec Government Representative in Chicago, Government of Québec Stephen G. Galarneau Director, Office of Great Waters, Great Lakes and Mississippi River Environmental Management Divison, Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources Board of Directors list is as of December 2018. Cover photo: Pictured Rocks National Lakeshore in Munising, Michigan, on Lake Superior ©flickr/74418101@N02/David Marvin. This page: Oak Street Beach in Chicago, Illinois, on Lake Michigan ©flickr/romanboed/Roman Boed. 2 John Linc Stine Darren J. Nichols Investing in a National Asset: Restoring the Great Lakes Basin Ecology and Economy ... Together MAY 2019 s the Great Lakes community of Partnership formally welcoming Ontario today, tomorrow and going forward to ensure heads into 2020 together, thank and Québec as members of the Great Lakes that we leave the Great Lakes Basin in better A you for joining us as we take Commission and as supporting partners condition and with even more opportunities a moment to reflect on the history and of the Great Lakes Basin Compact.
    [Show full text]
  • A D V I S O R
    A D V I S O R Vol. 11 No. 3 Guest editorial May/June 1998 One lakes problems mirror larger pollution Inside issues facing Great Lakes region Lake St. Clair By Rep. William Callahan, Member, Michigan Delegation to the Cleanup Great Lakes Commission ake St. Clair, as many of you know, has numerous problems. Local Even though this is just one lake—and not even one of the environmental L Great Lakes—its problems are symptomatic of the larger pol- action gets lution issues facing the Great Lakes region. One of the biggest prob- results lems facing Lake St. Clair is combined sewer overflow and high bacte- ria counts, which have resulted in closed beaches during the summer season. Lake St. Clair is of particular importance to the state of Michigan, In this issue with 60 percent of southeast Michigan’s drinking water derived from it. Also found in the Lake St. Clair system are numerous beaches, fishing, boating and other recre- Commission Briefs........2 ational and wildlife opportunities. It is easy to identify that there is pollution in a body of water, especially when there are as Another surprise for Great Lakes many problems as we’ve had with Lake St. Clair. The “closed beach” signs along our shore- community * Legislative and line in Macomb County bluntly show the public the severity of the problems. But identify- appropriations priorities * River ing pollution sources and developing solutions to the problems are much more difficult and basin organizations * Beneficial use involved processes. workshop * RAP Summit * Great I worked closely with 30 other members of Lakes Spill Protection Initiative * We have long pointed to Sediment transport modeling * the Blue Ribbon Commission on Lake St.
    [Show full text]
  • Rehabilitating Great Lakes Ecosystems
    REHABILITATING GREAT LAKES ECOSYSTEMS edited by GEORGE R. FRANCIS Faculty of Environmental Studies University of Waterloo Waterloo, Ontario N2L 3G1 JOHN J. MAGNUSON Laboratory of Limnology University of Wisconsin-Madison Madison, Wisconsin 53706 HENRY A. REGIER Institute for Environmental Studies University of Toronto Toronto. Ontario M5S 1A4 and DANIEL R. TALHELM Department of Fish and Wildlife Michigan State University East Lansing, Michigan 48824 TECHNICAL REPORT NO. 37 Great Lakes Fishery Commission 1451 Green Road Ann Arbor, Michigan 48105 December 1979 CONTENTS Executive summary.. .......................................... 1 Preface and acknowledgements ................................. 2 1. Background and overview of study ........................... 6 Approach to the study. .................................... 10 Some basic terminology ................................... 12 Rehabilitation images ...................................... 15 2. Lake ecology, historical uses and consequences ............... 16 Early information sources. ................................. 17 Original condition ......................................... 18 Human induced changes in Great Lakes ecosystems ......... 21 Conclusion ............................................. ..3 0 3. Rehabilitation methods ...................................... 30 Fishing and other harvesting ............................... 31 Introductions and invasions of exotics ...................... 33 Microcontaminants: toxic wastes and biocides ............... 34 Nutrients and eutrophication
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 - 2021 EW Sparrow Hospital Community Health Needs Assessment
    2019 - 2021 EW Sparrow Hospital Community Health Needs Assessment Prepared by the Michigan Public Health Institute Acknowledgements Every three years the Community Health Needs Assessment focuses an essential light on issues of disparity for the underinsured, impoverished, and disadvantaged of the mid-Michigan region. This important work would not be possible without the collective efforts of the Healthy! Capital Counties collaborative. We are grateful to our partners at Ingham County Health Department, Barry-Eaton District Health Department, and Mid-Michigan District Health Department for engaging stakeholders throughout Clinton, Ingham, and Eaton Counties in the Community Health Improvement Process. Healthy! Capital Counties played an integral role in convening key representatives from a diverse group of organizations to prioritize the identified health needs of residents in the service area, across the entire socioeconomic spectrum. This report would not have been possible without their knowledge, experience, and ability to meaningfully connect with the people who live and work in this region. Their work is the basis for Sparrow Health System’s Community Health Needs Assessment report, which seeks to address the disparities within our local population regarding how healthy we are, what health conditions we suffer from, and the root causes of those health problems. This allows Sparrow Health System to create and implement strategies that advance our mission to provide quality, compassionate care to everyone, every time. We would also like to offer our sincere thanks to the many individuals who participated in the focus groups and key informant interviews conducted by the Michigan Public Health Institute. These individuals shared experiences from their personal and professional lives that allowed Sparrow Health System to delve even deeper into high priority health issues.
    [Show full text]
  • Conference Proceedings Actions Toward
    Conference Proceedings Actions Toward a Sustainable Great Lakes May 4-6, 2004 Cleveland, Ohio Sponsored by the Great Lakes Commission and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers-Buffalo District in cooperation with 25 partner agencies and organizations. Conference Proceedings Actions Toward a Sustainable Great Lakes Table of Contents Preface I. Introduction .......................................................................................... 1 II. Key Findings and Recommendations ....................................................... 1 A. Water Use Management ................................................................ 2 B. Water Quality............................................................................... 3 C. Toxic Hotspots.............................................................................. 4 D. Aquatic Invasive Species ............................................................... 5 E. Human Health .............................................................................. 7 F. Habitat/Wetlands ......................................................................... 7 G. Sustainable Waterways (Commercial and Recreational)............. 10 H. Research and Decision Support.................................................... 11 III. Conclusions and Next Steps.................................................................. 13 Appendix A. Partner Agencies and Organizations ........................................... A-1 B. Conference Program....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Agenda 1301 S
    Potter Park Zoo Advisory Board AGENDA 1301 S. Pennsylvania Avenue ~ Lansing, MI 48912 Telephone: 517.342.2776; Fax: 517.316.3894 The Board information packet is available on-line by going to www.ingham.org, selecting “Monthly Calendar,” and clicking on “Wednesday, June 10, 2020”. POTTER PARK ZOO ADVISORY BOARD MEETING Wednesday, June 10, 2020 6:00 PM Via Zoom 1. Call to Order 2. Approval of May 13, 2020 Meeting Minutes. 3. Limited Public Comment – Limited to 3 minutes with no discussion 4. Late Items/Deletions/Consent Items 5. Director’s Report a. May 2020 Finance Report – Delphine Breeze b. Director’s Report – Cynthia Wagner/Amy Morris 6. New Business a. Resolution – Ingham County Parks and Zoo Rules b. 2021 Budget Discussion 7. Old Business a. Zoo Reopening Plan b. Strategy Subcommittee – Mary Leys c. External Relations Subcommittee – Cheryl Bergman d. Financial Sustainability Subcommittee – Kyle Binkley 8. Board Comments 9. Limited Public Comment - Limited to 3 minutes with no discussion 10. Upcoming Meeting a. Zoo Advisory Board Meeting July 8, 2020 at 6:00 PM 11. Adjournment Official minutes are stored and available for inspection at the address noted at the top of this agenda. Potter Park Zoo will provide necessary reasonable auxiliary aids and services, such as interpreters for the hearing impaired and audio tapes of printed materials being considered at the meeting for the visually impaired, for individuals with disabilities at the meeting upon five (5) working days’ notice to the Zoo. Individuals with disabilities requiring auxiliary aids or services should contact the Zoo by writing to: Zoo Director, 1301 S.
    [Show full text]
  • AGENDA Tuesday, January 16, 2018 5:30Pm PARKS & RECREATION
    Ingham County Parks & Recreation Commission 121 E. Maple Street, P.O. Box 178, Mason, MI 48854 AGENDA Telephone: 517.676.2233; Fax: 517.244.7190 The packet is available on-line by going to www.ingham.org, choosing the “Monthly Calendar,” and clicking on Tuesday, January 16, 2018 Tuesday, January 16, 2018 5:30pm PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION MEETING Main Shelter Lake Lansing Park North 6260 E. Lake Drive Haslett, Michigan 1. Call to Order 2. Pledge of Allegiance Note due to Holiday 3. Approval of Minutes meeting will be held on Minutes of December 11, 2017 regular meeting will be considered-Page 3 3 Tuesday instead of 4. Limited Public Comment ~ Limited to 3 minutes with no discussion Monday 5. APPROVE THE AGENDA Late Items / Changes/ Deletions 6. Check Presentation – Meridian Township Donation to the Friends of Ingham County Parks for the Lake Lansing Bandshell - Page 16 7. ELECTION OF 2018 OFFICERS A. Chair, Park Commission B. Vice-Chair, Park Commission C. Secretary, Park Commission 8. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS A. Director - Page 19 B. Park Managers - Page 20 C. Administrative Office - Page 24 D. Millage Coordinator Report - Page 26 E. FLRT Trail Ambassador Report - Lauren Ross - Page 27 9. ACTION ITEMS A. Resolution to Comply with Provisions of the Open Meetings Act Setting Parks & Recreation Commission Meetings for January 2018 through December 2018 - Page 28 B. Resolution Honoring Shirley Rodgers - Page 31 C. Master Plan Action Program Items – Page 32 D. Motion to Amend Recommendation for Funding for the Lansing Bank Stabilization-Washington Avenue Application - Page 46 10. DISCUSSION ITEMS A.
    [Show full text]
  • 5-Year Parks & Recreation Master Plan 2017-2021
    Charter Township of Meridian Department of Parks and Recreation Creating Community through People, Parks, and Programs 5-Year Parks & Recreation Master Plan 2017-2021 Adopted February 2017 Meridian Township Parks and Recreation Master Plan 1 Park Commission 2017-2021 Michael McDonald, Acting Chair Mark Stephens, Commissioner Richard Baker, Commissioner Amanda Lick, Commissioner Annika Brixie Schaetzl, Commissioner Parks and Recreation Staff LuAnn Maisner, Parks & Recreation Director Robin Faust, Administrative Assistant II Jane Greenway, Senior Parks and Land Management Coordinator Mike Devlin, Parks & Recreation Specialist Darcie Weigand, Parks & Recreation Specialist Kit Rich, Senior Park Naturalist, Harris Nature Center Kati Adams, Senior Park Naturalist, Harris Nature Center Kelsey Dillon, Stewardship Coordinator Dennis Antone, Facilities Superintendent Cheri Wisdom, Senior Center Coordinator Department of Parks and Recreation Meridian Township Parks and Recreation Master Plan 2 Table of Contents Page Introduction 8 I . Community Description 16 A. Location Description and Population Information 16 Map A: Location Map 18 B. Meridian Township Residents 19 C. Summary of The National Citizen Survey 2015 19 D. Township Millages & Ordinances 19 II. Administrative Structure 21 A. Role of the Township Board 21 B. Role of Park Commission 21 C. Role of Land Preservation Advisory Board 21 D. Role of Parks and Recreation Department 22 E. Parks and Recreation Administrative Staff 23 F. Organizational Chart 28 G. Funding Sources and Budget 29 H. Role of Volunteers 31 I. Relationships with School Districts, Other Public Agencies and Private Organizations 34 J. Role of the Environmental Commission 35 K. Other Environmental Planning Organizations 35 L. Communications 35 III. Parks and Recreation Inventory and Evaluation 37 A.
    [Show full text]