DOCSLIB.ORG

A D V I S O R

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A D V I S O R A D V I S O R Vol. 11 No. 3 Guest editorial May/June 1998 One lakes problems mirror larger pollution Inside issues facing Great Lakes region Lake St. Clair By Rep. William Callahan, Member, Michigan Delegation to the Cleanup Great Lakes Commission ake St. Clair, as many of you know, has numerous problems. Local Even though this is just one lake—and not even one of the environmental L Great Lakes—its problems are symptomatic of the larger pol- action gets lution issues facing the Great Lakes region. One of the biggest prob- results lems facing Lake St. Clair is combined sewer overflow and high bacte- ria counts, which have resulted in closed beaches during the summer season. Lake St. Clair is of particular importance to the state of Michigan, In this issue with 60 percent of southeast Michigan’s drinking water derived from it. Also found in the Lake St. Clair system are numerous beaches, fishing, boating and other recre- Commission Briefs........2 ational and wildlife opportunities. It is easy to identify that there is pollution in a body of water, especially when there are as Another surprise for Great Lakes many problems as we’ve had with Lake St. Clair. The “closed beach” signs along our shore- community * Legislative and line in Macomb County bluntly show the public the severity of the problems. But identify- appropriations priorities * River ing pollution sources and developing solutions to the problems are much more difficult and basin organizations * Beneficial use involved processes. workshop * RAP Summit * Great I worked closely with 30 other members of Lakes Spill Protection Initiative * We have long pointed to Sediment transport modeling * the Blue Ribbon Commission on Lake St. Clair, Upgrade for regional water use which was formed in 1997 to address pollution industrial waste and other database * Mayors' Conference * problems in the area. The commission’s sub- pollution as the sources of GLIN trip to Paraguay and Bolivia groups investigated discharges into the Clinton all water quality problems. * Waterborne commerce listening and St. Clair rivers; agricultural and residential session runoff, including pesticides and fertilizers; sew- However, this is not the age treatment and storm water concerns; and case. Agriculture runoff biological contaminants. Some of the Blue Rib- bon Commission’s important recommendations and storm sewers have Around the Lakes.........7 in its final report were tremendous impacts on Lake Superior diversion proposal * • Better enforcement of existing state and our water... Drought mitigation workshop * Blue local water pollution laws; Ribbon Commission on Lake St. • Public education on the causes and effects of water pollution; Clair * Lake St. Clair facts * • Encouragement of environmentally sensitive land use; Legal Institute of the Great Lakes * • Inspection of septic fields; Seaway Port Pacesetter awards * • Continuous in-stream monitoring programs; and Great Lakes art exhibit * Sustain- • Examination of ballast water and its impact on the increase of exotic species. able coastal development workshop The report was a good first step, but we need to generate public support and financial re- series * Poe Lock * Nationwide sources and foster a sense of cooperation throughout the local, state and federal levels to global climate change assessment * accomplish our goals. Clean Water Action Plan In addition to participating on the Blue Ribbon Commission, I developed two pieces of legislation to help reduce pollution. These bills had overwhelming support in both Calendar.....................12 Continued on page 9 • The ADVISOR is published bimonthly by the Great Lakes Commission • The Great Lakes Commission is an eight-state compact agency established in 1955 “to promote the orderly, integrated and comprehensive development, use and conservation of the water resources of the Great Lakes basin.” Donald R. Vonnahme, Chair; Michael J. Donahue, Ph.D., Executive Director Argus II Building • 400 Fourth Street • Ann Arbor, Michigan 48103-4816 • Phone: 734-665-9135 Fax: 734-665-4370 • E-mail: [email protected] • Web: www.glc.org Commission Briefs Great Lakes Commission The Great Lakes Commission, an eight-state Surprised again! compact agency founded in state and federal In the last ADVISOR, my com- mit action took the Great Lakes law and dedicated to the use, management ments focused on the short-lived des- policy community by surprise. and protection of the water resources of the Great Lakes basin, provides leadership in the ignation of Lake Champlain as a Interjurisdictional notification and implementation of principles of sustainable Great Lake. And, alluding to the un- consultation were entirely lacking. development throughout the basin. In partnership with the Great Lakes states, the settling precedent that such a designa- To be fair, it appears that no treaties, Commission addresses issues of resource tion would establish, I called for re- laws or agreements were violated management, environmental protection, transportation and economic development by newed vigilance to protect our re- when the permit was approved. The serving as an accurate and objective source of sources from ill-advised “surprises” permit process essentially “fell through information; an effective forum for the development and coordination of public that threaten the in- the cracks.” In so do- policy; and an active and committed advocate tegrity of the lakes or Commission ing, it highlighted an of basin interests. the infrastructure News and immediate need to Executive Committee that has evolved to Views harmonize manage- Chair Donald R. Vonnahme (IL) manage them. The ment approaches in proverbial ink on my By Michael J. Donahue, Ph.D. all jurisdictions and Vice Chair Irene B. Brooks (PA) Executive Director provide the ammuni- Frank L. Kudrna (IL) column had not yet Larry D. Macklin (IN) dried when the Great Lakes policy tion needed to oppose and prevent ir- Frank J. Kelley (MI) community was surprised again. responsible use of the resource. Thomas E. Huntley (MN) I speak, of course, of a permit the I believe that three actions are war- John P. Cahill (NY) Ontario government recently granted ranted in the immediate future. First, J. William Moody (OH) to a Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario, com- the states and provinces must move Nathaniel E. Robinson (WI) pany that planned to export Lake Su- decisively to develop and implement a Executive Director perior water to prospective markets in Great Lakes water resources manage- Michael J. Donahue, Ph.D. Asia (see related story on page 7). Like ment program to avoid our historic Program Managers the Lake Champlain designation, the crisis response approach to diversion Thomas R. Crane, Resource permit action prompted a swift outcry and consumptive use proposals. Such Management and Environmental Quality from Great Lakes governors, members a program was called for in the 1985 Stephen J. Thorp, Transportation and of Congress and many interest groups. Great Lakes Charter and, 13 years Economic Development Like the Lake Champlain issue, the later, has yet to be developed. Julie R. Wagemakers, Communications and proposal was short-lived; the permit Second, we must review the current Information Management revocation process was underway management regime for addressing such Project Managers within weeks of issuance. And, like the issues to determine whether our current Laura N. Beer, Matthew Doss, Katherine Lake Champlain designation, a battle set of treaty, legislative and agreement- Glassner-Shwayder, Christine Manninen has been won but the war is not over. based arrangements adequately address The issue touches on the very foun- current and future needs. Program Specialists dation of ecosystem integrity and eco- And finally, I believe that a truly bi- Derek Moy, Prapassara Nilagupta, Victoria Pebbles, Thomas Rayburn, nomic well-being; on our ability, as national Great Lakes Commission Lisa E. Rives, Michael Schneider, stewards of the resource, to maintain with full, voting provincial member- Lara Slee control over the future of the region’s ship could help avoid the type of sur- Director of Research, Emeritus greatest natural asset. This recent in- prise experienced with the Lake Supe- Albert G. Ballert, Ph.D. cident has highlighted, once again, in- rior diversion permit. Open and ongo- adequacies in the current binational ing dialogue among all basin jurisdic- Administrative Staff Cappy Bilakos, Pat Gable, Marilyn Ratliff, water resource management regime. tions is perhaps the most effective tool Rita J. Straith Alarm over such a permit is well- we can employ for improved water re- founded. It sets a dangerous legal pre- sources management. Research Associates George Aponte Clarke, Kate Hackett, cedent that could leave the region Interjurisdictional relations in the Margaret Le vulnerable to much larger schemes in Great Lakes basin are the envy of the future. It ignores the cumulative North America and beyond. When The Great Lakes Commission is an equal opportunity employer and complies with impacts that occur if such a scheme is the political will and motivation to applicable federal and state laws prohibiting found to be commercially viable and strengthen binational water resources discrimination. It is the policy of the Commission that no person, on the basis of race, gender, leads to a new export industry. Even management is present, we can’t help color, religion, national origin or ancestry, age, more alarming is the fact that the per- but succeed. marital status, handicap or
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Great Lakes Commission Info Sheet
    lllinois Indiana Michigan Minnesota New York Ohio Pennsylvania Wisconsin Ontario Québec www.glc.org The Great Lakes The Great Lakes are an environmental and economic asset for the United States and Canada. The lakes fuel a $6 trillion regional economy and hold 90% of the U.S. supply of fresh surface water, providing drinking water for more than 40 million people. More than 1.5 million U.S. jobs are directly connected to the Great Lakes and those jobs generate $62 billion in wages annually. The Great Lakes Commission To ensure that this vital resource is protected, the The GLC provides the following core services to our member eight Great Lakes states created the Great Lakes states and provinces: 1) communications and outreach; Commission (GLC) in 1955 via the Great Lakes Basin 2) information management and delivery; 3) facilitation and Compact. In 1968, Congress provided its consent to the consensus building; 4) policy coordination and advocacy; and Compact and the interstate compact agency it created. 5) regional project management. We employ these services to carry out a variety of projects and activities in the areas of: The eight U.S. states and two Canadian provinces are represented on the GLC by a delegation of government- Water Quality appointed commissioners. The GLC recommends policies Water Use, Management and Infrastructure and practices to balance the use, development, and Commercial Navigation conservation of the water resources of the Great Lakes and Great Lakes Waterfront Community Revitalization and Economic Development brings the region together to work on issues that no single Coastal Conservation and Habitat Restoration community, state, province, or nation can tackle alone.
    [Show full text]
  • Great Lakes Compact Commission
    2018 Annual Report 1 Board of Directors John Linc Stine, Chair Commissioner, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Sharon Jackson, Vice Chair Deputy General Counsel, Office of the Governor of Indiana Jon W. Allan, Immediate Past Chair Director, Office of the Great Lakes, Michigan Department of Natural Resources Wayne A. Rosenthal Director, Illinois Department of Natural Resources Basil Seggos Commissioner, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation James Zehringer Director, Ohio Department of Natural Resources William Carr Senior Manager, Government of Ontario Office of International Relations and Policy Timothy J. Bruno Chief, Office of the Great Lakes, Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection Jean-François Hould Québec Government Representative in Chicago, Government of Québec Stephen G. Galarneau Director, Office of Great Waters, Great Lakes and Mississippi River Environmental Management Divison, Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources Board of Directors list is as of December 2018. Cover photo: Pictured Rocks National Lakeshore in Munising, Michigan, on Lake Superior ©flickr/74418101@N02/David Marvin. This page: Oak Street Beach in Chicago, Illinois, on Lake Michigan ©flickr/romanboed/Roman Boed. 2 John Linc Stine Darren J. Nichols Investing in a National Asset: Restoring the Great Lakes Basin Ecology and Economy ... Together MAY 2019 s the Great Lakes community of Partnership formally welcoming Ontario today, tomorrow and going forward to ensure heads into 2020 together, thank and Québec as members of the Great Lakes that we leave the Great Lakes Basin in better A you for joining us as we take Commission and as supporting partners condition and with even more opportunities a moment to reflect on the history and of the Great Lakes Basin Compact.
    [Show full text]
  • Rehabilitating Great Lakes Ecosystems
    REHABILITATING GREAT LAKES ECOSYSTEMS edited by GEORGE R. FRANCIS Faculty of Environmental Studies University of Waterloo Waterloo, Ontario N2L 3G1 JOHN J. MAGNUSON Laboratory of Limnology University of Wisconsin-Madison Madison, Wisconsin 53706 HENRY A. REGIER Institute for Environmental Studies University of Toronto Toronto. Ontario M5S 1A4 and DANIEL R. TALHELM Department of Fish and Wildlife Michigan State University East Lansing, Michigan 48824 TECHNICAL REPORT NO. 37 Great Lakes Fishery Commission 1451 Green Road Ann Arbor, Michigan 48105 December 1979 CONTENTS Executive summary.. .......................................... 1 Preface and acknowledgements ................................. 2 1. Background and overview of study ........................... 6 Approach to the study. .................................... 10 Some basic terminology ................................... 12 Rehabilitation images ...................................... 15 2. Lake ecology, historical uses and consequences ............... 16 Early information sources. ................................. 17 Original condition ......................................... 18 Human induced changes in Great Lakes ecosystems ......... 21 Conclusion ............................................. ..3 0 3. Rehabilitation methods ...................................... 30 Fishing and other harvesting ............................... 31 Introductions and invasions of exotics ...................... 33 Microcontaminants: toxic wastes and biocides ............... 34 Nutrients and eutrophication
    [Show full text]
  • Conference Proceedings Actions Toward
    Conference Proceedings Actions Toward a Sustainable Great Lakes May 4-6, 2004 Cleveland, Ohio Sponsored by the Great Lakes Commission and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers-Buffalo District in cooperation with 25 partner agencies and organizations. Conference Proceedings Actions Toward a Sustainable Great Lakes Table of Contents Preface I. Introduction .......................................................................................... 1 II. Key Findings and Recommendations ....................................................... 1 A. Water Use Management ................................................................ 2 B. Water Quality............................................................................... 3 C. Toxic Hotspots.............................................................................. 4 D. Aquatic Invasive Species ............................................................... 5 E. Human Health .............................................................................. 7 F. Habitat/Wetlands ......................................................................... 7 G. Sustainable Waterways (Commercial and Recreational)............. 10 H. Research and Decision Support.................................................... 11 III. Conclusions and Next Steps.................................................................. 13 Appendix A. Partner Agencies and Organizations ........................................... A-1 B. Conference Program....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Great Lakes Aquatic Invasive Species Landing Blitz 2020 Partnering Agencies and Organizations
    Great Lakes Aquatic Invasive Species Landing Blitz 2020 Partnering Agencies and Organizations Updated: June 23, 2020 Page | 1 State/Province Partner Federal Fisheries and Oceans Canada Illinois Illinois Department of Natural Resources Illinois Illinois-Indiana Sea Grant Indiana Indiana Department of Natural Resources Michigan Michigan Department of Environment, Great Lakes and Energy Michigan Michigan Department of Natural Resources Michigan Alcona Iosco Cedar Lake Association Michigan Barry, Calhoun & Kalamazoo Cooperative Invasive Species Management Area Michigan Black Lake Preservation Society Michigan Cass County Conservation District Michigan Cisco Chain Riparian Owners Association Michigan Fremont Lake Association Michigan Gun Lake Tribe Michigan Harwood Lake Association Michigan Higgins Lake Foundation Michigan Higgins Lake Property Owner's Association Michigan Kent Conservation District Michigan Lake Ellen Association Michigan Maceday Lotus Lakes Association Michigan Marquette County Michigan Meridian Twp. Lake Lansing Advisory Board Michigan Paradise Lake Association Michigan Pentwater Lake Association Michigan U.S. Coast Guard Auxiliary Michigan Walloon Lake Association and Conservancy Minnesota Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Minnesota Minnesota Sea Grant Minnesota Carlton County Minnesota Cook County Minnesota Lake County Minnesota Lake SWCD Minnesota North St. Louis SWCD Minnesota St. Louis County New York New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Great Lakes Aquatic Invasive Species Landing Blitz
    [Show full text]
  • Restoring the Great Lakes Economic Impact
    Restoring the Great Lakes The Great Lakes Restoration Initiative was launched in 2010 to restore and protect the lakes. Congress Every GLRI project dollar appropriated $2.5 billion from 2010 to 2017 to fund spent 2010-2016: more than 3,600 projects that have dramatically improved environmental conditions around • Will produce $3.35 of additional the region. economic activity through 2036 Over the past eight years, the GLRI has been • Will generate $1.62 in additional celebrated for the progress it has made toward economic activity in tourism- restoring and protecting the Great Lakes. Six million related industries through 2036 pounds of invasive Asian carp have been trapped and removed from the Illinois River, more than 402,000 • Produced quality of life pounds of phosphorus have been prevented from improvements worth $1.08 to running into the lakes, and more than 180,000 acres residents in coastal communities of fish and wildlife habitat have been protected or restored. The most environmentally sensitive and damaged areas are being cleaned up and toxic residue is being removed from the lakes. These accomplishments have resulted from the unparalleled partnerships between the U.S. federal government, states, cities and towns, tribes, businesses, and nonprofit organizations that the GLRI set in motion. Economic impact of Great Lakes restoration Despite strong anecdotal evidence that the GLRI helped turn the economy around in many Great Lakes communities, until recently there was no comprehensive study of the overall impact of the program
    [Show full text]
  • GLC Declaration of Partnership
    Declaration of Partnership Whereas, the informed use, management and protection of the water and related land resources of the Great Lakes St. Lawrence Basin is essential in maintaining a healthy environment, strong economy and high quality of life for all Basin residents; and Whereas, the Basin is a shared, binational resource that requires a spirit of collaboration among multiple jurisdictions to ensure an effi cient and effective approach to shared goals; and Whereas, the Great Lakes states and the Governments of Ontario and Quebec have demonstrated their stewardship responsibility for Basin resources through a strong and growing partnership; and Whereas, this partnership is recognized in the Great Lakes Basin Compact, as signed into law by the legislature in every Great Lakes state; and Whereas, the Governments of Ontario and Quebec presently enjoy “Observer” status within the Great Lakes Commission; and Whereas, the Great Lakes states and the Governments of Ontario and Quebec share an interest in strengthening and formalizing this relationship. Therefore, Be It Resolved, that the eight member states of the Great Lakes Commission extend, and the Governments of Ontario and Quebec accept, Associate Member status on the Great Lakes Commission; and Be It Further Resolved, that the Great Lakes states invite the Governments of Ontario and Quebec to appoint a delegation of representatives to the Great Lakes Commission, for the purpose of participating in meetings and activities as provided for in the Great Lakes Basin Compact; and Be It Finally Resolved, that the Great Lakes states and Governments of Ontario and Quebec view Associate Member status as an important step toward the goal of a stronger partnership as provided for in the Great Lakes Basin Compact adopted by the eight Great Lakes states.
    [Show full text]
  • The International Joint Commission and the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement
    WORKING PAPER SERIES 023 NORTH AMERICAN LINKAGES The International Joint Commission and the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement Lessons for Canada-United States Regulatory Co-operation Rick Findlay and Peter Telford Pollution Probe April 2006 Policy Research Initiative Working Paper Series The Working Paper Series presents ongoing analytical work developed in relation to the PRI’s horizontal projects. The papers are presented in the language of preparation only, with a summary in both official languages. They do not necessarily represent the views of the Policy Research Initiative or the Government of Canada. Série de documents de travail du Projet de recherche sur les politiques La série de documents de travail présente les travaux d’analyses en cours réalisés dans le cadre des projets horizontaux du PRP. Les articles sont présentés uniquement dans la langue dans laquelle ils ont été rédigés, avec un résumé dans les deux langues officielles. Ils ne reflètent pas l’opinion définitive du Projet de recherche sur les politiques ni du gouvernement du Canada. Table of Contents 1. Introduction............................................................................................................... 1 2. Institutional History ................................................................................................. 2 Boundary Waters Treaty...................................................................................... 2 International Joint Commission ......................................................................... 2
    [Show full text]
  • Living with the Lakes! Liters X 0.26 = Gallons Area Square Kilometers X 0.4 = Square Miles
    LivingLiving withwith thethe LakesLakes UnderstandingUnderstanding andand AdaptingAdapting toto GreatGreat LakesLakes WaterWater LevelLevel ChangesChanges MEASUREMENTS CONVERTER TABLE U.S. to Metric Length feet x .305 = meters miles x 1.6 = kilometers The Detroit District, established in 1841, is responsible for water Volume resource development in all of Michigan and the Great Lakes watersheds in cubic feet x 0.03 = cubic meters Minnesota, Wisconsin and Indiana. gallons x 3.8 = liters Area square miles x 2.6 = square kilometers Mass pounds x 0.45 = kilograms Metric to U.S. The Great Lakes Commission is an eight-state compact agency established in Length 1955 to promote the orderly, integrated and comprehensive development, use and conservation of the water resources of the Great Lakes basin. meters x 3.28 = feet kilometers x 0.6 = miles Volume cubic meters x 35.3 = cubic feet Order your copy of Living with the Lakes! liters x 0.26 = gallons Area square kilometers x 0.4 = square miles Mass kilograms x 2.2 = pounds This publication is a joint project of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Photo credits Detroit District, and the Great Lakes Commission. Cover: Michigan Travel Bureau; Page 3 (l. to r.): Michigan Travel Bureau, Michigan Travel Bureau, Illinois-Indiana Sea Grant (photo by David Editors Riecks); Page 4: Illinois-Indiana Sea Grant (photo by David Riecks); Page 5: Roger Gauthier, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Detroit District U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) (image by Lisa Jipping); Page 8: Michael J. Donahue, Julie Wagemakers and Tom Crane, Great Lakes Commission Michigan Travel Bureau; Page 9: National Park Service, Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore (photo by Richard Frear); Page 10 (t.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Great Lakes Commission Annual Meeting Réunion Annuelle De La Commission Des Grands Lacs 2019 OCTOBER 9-11, 2019 • QUÉBEC
    2019 Great Lakes Commission Annual Meeting Réunion Annuelle de la Commission des Grands Lacs 2019 OCTOBER 9-11, 2019 • QUÉBEC 1300 Victors Way, Suite 1350 Ann Arbor, MI 48108-5203 734-971-9135 • www.glc.org @GLCommission facebook.com/greatlakescommission #GLCQC19 p. 3 AGENDA p. 9 Minutes p. 30 Action Items p. 107 Strategic Plan Progress Reports p.153 Reference HILTON QUÉBEC • 1100 BOULEVARD RENÉ‐LÉVESQUE EAST • QUÉBEC, QC • G1R 4P3 • 1 418‐647‐2411 FINAL DRAFT AGENDA – 10/3/2019 – ORDRE DU JOUR PROVISOIRE Wednesday, October 9 Mercredi, le 9 octobre All times EST / Heure de l’Est Activities at the National Assembly (GLC Board & Staff) Activités à l’Assemblée nationale (conseil d’administration et employés de la CGL) 10:00 a.m. Motion: 20th Anniversary of Québec’s Participation in the Quebec National Assembly Great Lakes Commission GLC Board of Directors Motion: 20e anniversaire de la participation du Québec à la Commission des Grands Lacs 11:00 a.m. Visit to the Quebec National Assembly Tour: Great Lakes Commission Board Visite de l’Assemblée nationale Remarks: Invited dignitaries 12:00 p.m. Lunch with Québec Legislative Assembly Salon de la présidence Representatives Hosts : Gilles Bélanger, Carlos Leitão Déjeuner avec des élus de l’Assemblée nationale du Québec Table service Meeting of GLC Board of Directors (GLC Board & Staff) Rencontre du conseil d’administration de la CGL (membres du conseil et employés seulement) 1:30 p.m. Meeting of GLC Board of Directors Sainte-Foy/Portneuf, Hilton Québec Rencontre du conseil d’administration de la CGL GLC Board, staff • Update: Exploring options for consensus‐based binational Guests: Jerry Cormick, Glenn Sigurdson, and ballast water management policy Dana Goodson • Interim Finance Committee report • Blue Accounting and the Great Lakes Commission • Additional Board meeting items TBA 5:00 p.m.
    [Show full text]
  • A Joint Action Plan for Lake Erie a Report of the Great Lakes Commission Lake Erie Nutrient Targets Working Group September, 2015
    A Joint Action Plan for Lake Erie A Report of the Great Lakes Commission Lake Erie Nutrient Targets Working Group September, 2015 A 2014 Great Lakes Commission Lake Erie Water Pollution resolution committed the Lake Erie states and the Province of Ontario to form a working group to develop new and refine existing practices, programs and policies to achieve pollutant reduction targets and/or identify additional remedies to improve water quality in Lake Erie. This report is a product of the Lake Erie Nutrient Targets (LENT) Working Group that formed following that resolution. It is envisioned that this Joint Action Plan will drive further actions, consultations and discussions that the states and the province can advance in the near term as longer-term efforts are underway through the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement (GLWQA) Nutrients Annex (Annex 4) process, including release of final Lake Erie nutrient targets in 2016 and Domestic Action Plans in 2018. The actions described here complement and expand on the commitments made by the Governors of Ohio and Michigan and the Premier of Ontario in their Western Basin of Lake Erie Collaborative Agreement signed in June 2015. PREAMBLE Lake Erie is the eleventh largest lake on Earth by surface area.1 Of the five Laurentian Great Lakes, Lake Erie is the southernmost, the smallest by volume, the shallowest, and also the warmest. It is the most biologically productive, supporting the largest Great Lakes sport fishery. Lake Erie has three distinct sub-basins: a very shallow western basin and related islands; a deeper central basin; an even deeper eastern basin that drains into the Niagara River and Lake Ontario.
    [Show full text]
  • New Name, New Faces, Same Goal!
    FALL 2019 New name, new faces, same goal! Did you notice? The Great Lakes Harmful Algal Blooms (HABs) Collaboratory has become the HABs Collaborative! What does this mean? The truth is, we’re not sure yet, but our goal (and tagline) remains the same: together we’ll link science and management to reduce harmful algal blooms in the Great Lakes. Focusing on how we work together is what inspired the change to a more traditional collaborative. Great Lakes Commission (GLC) staff will continue to stand as the ‘backbone organization’ for the work—and rather than supporting the ‘collective laboratory’ model, we will assure that our members have what they need to collaborate and communicate the science behind HABs among decision-makers and other interested stakeholders. So, what’s changing? First, Nicole Zacharda, Program Manager at the GLC has been asked to help strengthen the GLC’s support to the Collaborative. Nicole has been working in water quality issues for 20 years, having spent the past four at the GLC as the lead on various programs and projects involving nutrient pollution and the Great Lakes. As a Blue Accounting issue lead (for both ErieStat and Source Water), Nicole looks forward to helping the HABs Collaborative grow as a trusted space for Great Lakes stakeholders and decision-makers to access the latest science on HABs affecting our lakes. The HABs Collaborative has further defined and updated its organizational Nicole Zacharda structure to reflect these changes: Great Lakes HABs Collaborative Organizational Structure, November 2019 GREAT LAKES HABS COLLABORATIVE NEWSLETTER • FALL 2019 NEW: Member Spotlight We know a lot of good work is happening around the Great Lakes Basin thanks to many of our Collaborative members.
    [Show full text]