Chapter 2: Watershed Characterization

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Chapter 2: Watershed Characterization Approved Chapter 2 WATERSHED CHARACTERIZATION APPROVED ASSESSMENT REPORT for the Grey Sauble Source Protection Area October 15, 2015 Appendix E - Approved Assessment Report -- Grey Sauble Source Protection Area Approved This page intentionally left blank. Appendix E - Approved Assessment Report -- Grey Sauble Source Protection Area Approved APPROVED ASSESSMENT REPORT for the Grey Sauble Source Protection Area Table of Contents CHAPTER 2.0 WATERSHED CHARACTERIZATION 2.0 Watershed Characterization ......................................................................................... 2-1 2.1 Source Protection Region .............................................................................................. 2-1 2.2 Grey Sauble Source Protection Area ........................................................................... 2-1 2.2.1 Jurisdictions .......................................................................................................... 2-2 2.2.1.1 Conservation Authorities ......................................................................... 2-2 2.2.1.2 Municipalities .......................................................................................... 2-3 2.2.1.3 Provincial Ministries ................................................................................ 2-4 2.2.1.4 Federal Government................................................................................. 2-5 2.2.1.5 First Nations ............................................................................................. 2-5 2.2.2 Non-Governmental Organizations and the Public ................................................ 2-6 2.3 Physical Description....................................................................................................... 2-9 2.3.1 Surface Elevation (Topography) .......................................................................... 2-9 2.3.2 Bedrock Geology .................................................................................................. 2-9 2.3.2.1 Karst Features ....................................................................................... 2-11 2.3.3 Surficial Geology ................................................................................................ 2-12 2.3.3.1 Overburden Thickness ........................................................................... 2-13 2.3.4 Physiography ...................................................................................................... 2-14 2.3.5 Soil Characteristics.............................................................................................. 2-14 2.4 Surface Water Hydrology .......................................................................................... 2-15 2.5 Naturally Vegetated Areas .......................................................................................... 2-16 2.5.1 Wetlands .............................................................................................................. 2-17 2.5.2 Woodlands and Vegetated Riparian Areas ......................................................... 2-21 2.5.2.1 Woodlands ............................................................................................. 2-21 2.5.2.2 Vegetated Riparian Areas ...................................................................... 2-22 2.6 Aquatic Ecology ........................................................................................................... 2-22 2.6.1 Fisheries ............................................................................................................. 2-22 2.6.2 Aquatic Macroinvertebrates ................................................................................ 2-24 2.6.3 Species and Habitats at Risk .............................................................................. 2-25 2.6.4 Invasive Species ................................................................................................. 2-27 Appendix E - Approved Assessment Report -- Grey Sauble Source Protection Area Approved 2.7 Human Characterization............................................................................................. 2-28 2.7.1 Population Distribution and Density ................................................................... 2-28 2.7.2 Land Use ............................................................................................................ 2-29 2.7.2.1 Settlement Areas ................................................................................... 2-30 2.7.2.2 Rural Areas ............................................................................................ 2-31 2.7.2.3 Rural Residential .................................................................................... 2-31 2.7.2.4 Cottage and Camp Development ......................................................... 2-31 2.7.2.5 Planned Development ............................................................................ 2-32 2.7.2.6 Industrial/Commercial Sectors Distribution .......................................... 2-32 2.7.2.7 Quarries and Aggregate Extraction ....................................................... 2-32 2.7.2.8 Transportation ........................................................................................ 2-34 2.7.2.9 Utilities ................................................................................................... 2-34 2.7.2.10 Institutional Lands ................................................................................. 2-34 2.7.2.11 Hazard and Natural Environment Land Use ......................................... 2-35 2.7.2.12 Other Land Use ..................................................................................... 2-35 2.7.3 Wastewater Treatment ........................................................................................ 2-35 2.7.4 Brownfields ........................................................................................................ 2-36 2.7.5 Oil, Gas and Salt Facilities .................................................................................. 2-37 2.7.6 Agricultural Resources ....................................................................................... 2-37 2.7.7 Forestry ............................................................................................................... 2-42 2.7.8 Protected Areas .................................................................................................. 2-42 2.7.9 Recreation ........................................................................................................... 2-44 2.8 Water Quality .............................................................................................................. 2-45 2.8.1 Indicator Parameters............................................................................................ 2-46 2.8.2 Surface Water Quality Data Analysis ................................................................. 2-49 2.8.3 Groundwater Quality Data Analysis and Reporting ........................................... 2-54 2.8.4 Great Lakes Index Station Monitoring ................................................................ 2-57 2.9 Water Use ............................................................................................................... 2-59 2.10 Data and Knowledge Gaps for Watershed Characterization ................................ 2-60 REFERENCES ........................................................................................................... 2-61 MAPS Appendix E - Approved Assessment Report -- Grey Sauble Source Protection Area Approved List of Figures Figure 2.2.1 Shallow Lake ....................................................................................................... 2-2 Figure 2.3.1 Indian Falls Conservation Area ......................................................................... 2-10 Figure 2.3.2 Karst Formation ................................................................................................ 2-11 Figure 2.8.1 Summary of selected water quality parameters from the Great Lakes Index Station monitoring program at the Colpoys Bay (Georgian Bay) location ...... 2-58 Figure 2.8.2 Summary of selected water quality parameters from the Great Lakes Index Station monitoring program at the Owen Sound (Georgian Bay) location ....... 2-59 List of Tables Table 2.2.1 Municipalities within the Grey Sauble Source Protection Area (SPA) .............. 2-4 Table 2.2.2 Non-Governmental Organizations in the Grey Sauble SPA ............................... 2-6 Table 2.3.1 Stratigraphy of Bedrock in the Grey Sauble SPA ............................................. 2-10 Table 2.3.2 Summary of Quaternary Deposits and Events in the Grey Sauble SPA ........... 2-13 Table 2.4.1 River Systems in the Grey Sauble SPA .......................................................... 2-16 Table 2.5.1 Wetlands as a Percentage of Land Area in Subwatersheds in the Grey Sauble SPA ............................................................................................. 2-18 Table 2.5.2 Wetlands database for the Grey Sauble SPA .................................................... 2-19 Table 2.6.1 Classification by Thermal Regime of Streams in the Grey Sauble SPA ......... 2-23 Table 2.6.2 Species at Risk in the Grey Sauble SPA ........................................................... 2-26 Table 2.6.3 Invasive Species in the Grey Sauble SPA ......................................................... 2-27 Table 2.7.1 Population and Densities
Recommended publications
  • Phase 1 Geoscientific Desktop Preliminary Assessment of Potential
    Phase 1 Geoscientific Desktop Preliminary Assessment of Potential Suitability for Siting a Deep Geological Repository for Canada’s Used Nuclear Fuel MUNICIPALITIES OF ARRAN-ELDERSLIE, BROCKTON AND SOUTH BRUCE, TOWNSHIP OF HURON-KINLOSS AND TOWN OF SAUGEEN SHORES, ONTARIO APM-REP-06144-0108 JUNE 2014 This report has been prepared under contract to the NWMO. The report has been reviewed by the NWMO, but the views and conclusions are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of the NWMO. All copyright and intellectual property rights belong to the NWMO. For more information, please contact: Nuclear Waste Management Organization 22 St. Clair Avenue East, Sixth Floor Toronto, Ontario M4T 2S3 Canada Tel 416.934.9814 Toll Free 1.866.249.6966 Email [email protected] www.nwmo.ca Phase 1 Geoscientific Desktop Preliminary Assessment of Potential Suitability for Siting a Deep Geological Repository for Canada’s Used Nuclear Fuel Municipalities of Arran-Elderslie, Brockton and South Bruce, Township of Huron-Kinloss and Town of Saugeen Shores Revision: 0 (Final) Prepared for: Nuclear Waste Management Organization 22 ST. Clair Avenue East, 6th Floor Toronto, Ontario M4T 2S3 Prepared by: Document ID: Sed Sites_Main Report_ June 30_R0 NWMO Report Number: APM-REP-06144-0108 June 2014 Geoscientific Desktop Suitability Assessment Study Sedimentary Sites, Southern Ontario Final Report Phase 1 Geoscientific Desktop Preliminary Assessment of Potential Suitability for Siting a Deep Geological Repository for Canada’s Used Title: Nuclear Fuel,
    [Show full text]
  • Species at Risk Act
    Consultation on Amending the List of Species under the Species at Risk Act Terrestrial Species November 2011 Information contained in this publication or product may be reproduced, in part or in whole, and by any means, for personal or public non-commercial purposes, without charge or further permission, unless otherwise specified. You are asked to: Exercise due diligence in ensuring the accuracy of the materials reproduced; Indicate both the complete title of the materials reproduced, as well as the author organization; and Indicate that the reproduction is a copy of an official work that is published by the Government of Canada and that the reproduction has not been produced in affiliation with or with the endorsement of the Government of Canada. Commercial reproduction and distribution is prohibited except with written permission from the Government of Canada’s copyright administrator, Public Works and Government Services of Canada (PWGSC). For more information, please contact PWGSC at 613-996-6886 or at [email protected]. Cover photo credits: Olive Clubtail © Jim Johnson Peacock Vinyl Lichen © Timothy B. Wheeler Cerulean Warbler © Carl Savignac Title page photo credits: Background photo: Dune Tachinid Fly habitat © Sydney Cannings Foreground, large photo: Dwarf Lake Iris © Jessie M. Harris Small photos, left to right: Butler’s Gartersnake © Daniel W.A. Noble Hungerford’s Crawling Water Beetle © Steve Marshall Barn Swallow © Gordon Court Spring Salamander © David Green Available also on the Internet. ISSN: 1710-3029 Cat. no.: EN1-36/2011E-PDF © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, represented by the Minister of the Environment, 2011 Consultation on Amending the List of Species under the Species at Risk Act Terrestrial Species November 2011 Please submit your comments by February 8, 2012, for terrestrial species undergoing normal consultations and by November 8, 2012, for terrestrial species undergoing extended consultations.
    [Show full text]
  • The Value of Our Natural Areas
    The Value of Our Natural Areas A Cursory Valuation of Ecosystem Services Provided by Grey Sauble Conservation Properties Grey Sauble Conservation Tim Lanthier 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction............................................................................................... 1-1 Defining and Valuating Ecosystem Services ............................................................. 1-1 Significance of Ecosystem Services ......................................................................... 1-3 Purpose of Reviewing Ecosystem Services within GSC Watershed ......................... 1-3 Background............................................................................................... 2-1 Geographic Context of this Review ........................................................................... 2-2 Land Cover Classes .................................................................................................. 2-2 Methodology and Limitations ................................................................. 3-1 Valuation Methodology ............................................................................................. 3-1 Limitations ................................................................................................................. 3-2 Ecosystem Values by Cover Type ............................................................................ 3-2 Discussion ................................................................................................ 4-1 Distribution of Ecosystem Service Values
    [Show full text]
  • Abstracts & Contact List
    Abstracts & Contact List 1 Great Lakes Waterfowl Symposium Primary Organization & Logistic Coordination: Long Point Waterfowl & Wetlands Research Fund Primary Sponsors: Canadian Wildlife Service - Environment Canada, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, & Ducks Unlimited Canada Additional Sponsors: Ducks Unlimited, Inc., Delta Waterfowl Foundation, Wildlife Habitat Canada / Wetland Habitat Fund, & Bird Studies Canada GLWS Organizing Committee: Long Point Waterfowl & Wetlands Research Fund Scott Petrie Shannon Badzinski Canadian Wildlife Service – Environment Canada Gary McCullough Norm North Paul Ashley Danny Bernard James Vanos Ducks Unlimited Canada Michel Gendron Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources Bruce Pollard GLWS Student Awards Committee: Michael Anderson Institute for Wetland & Waterfowl Research – DUC Ron Gatti Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources Ken Ross Canadian Wildlife Service – Environment Canada 2 Purpose of the Symposium The Great Lakes basin provides important staging, wintering, and breeding habitat for many species of ducks, geese and swans. The lakes and their associated habitats are not only spatially and temporally dynamic but are under constant threat from anthropogenic disturbances and introduction or proliferation of several exotic species. For these reasons, it is essential to increase our knowledge about the ecology, management, and threats facing waterfowl in the Great Lakes region. Presently, there are several government agencies, private organizations, and university researchers monitoring and studying waterfowl in and around the Great Lakes basin. However, collaboration among these parties could be improved, particularly across political boundaries. To promote communication, coordination, collaboration, and idea sharing among interested parties, the Long Point Waterfowl and Wetlands Research Fund, Canadian Wildlife Service - Environment Canada, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, and Ducks Unlimited decided to organize this Great Lakes Waterfowl Symposium.
    [Show full text]
  • Saugeen Shores
    INITIAL SCREENING FOR SITING A DEEP GEOLOGICAL REPOSITORY FOR CANADA’S USED NUCLEAR FUEL The Corporation of the Town of Saugeen Shores INITIAL SCREENING FOR SITING A DEEP GEOLOGICAL REPOSITORY FOR CANADA’S USED NUCLEAR FUEL The Corporation of the Town of Saugeen Shores Prepared by: AECOM 300 – 300 Town Centre Boulevard 905 477 8400 tel Markham, ON, Canada L3R 5Z6 905 477 1456 fax www.aecom.com Project Number: 60247068-4 Date: September, 2012 The Corporation of the Town of Saugeen Shores Initial Screening for Siting a Deep Geological Repository for Canada’s Used Nuclear Fuel AECOM Signatures Report Prepared By: Robin Frizzell, M.Sc., P.Geo Senior Geoscientist Report Reviewed By: Robert E.J. Leech, P.Geo. Practice Lead, Environment The Corporation of the Town of Saugeen Shores Initial Screening for Siting a Deep Geological Repository for Canada’s Used Nuclear Fuel Executive Summary On May 14, 2012, the Corporation of the Town of Saugeen Shores expressed interest in learning more about the Nuclear Waste Management Organization’s (NWMO) site selection process to find an informed and willing community to host a deep geological repository for Canada’s used nuclear fuel (NWMO, 2010). This report summarizes the findings of an initial screening, conducted by AECOM, to evaluate the potential suitability of the Town of Saugeen Shores against five screening criteria using readily available information. The purpose of the initial screening is to identify whether there are any obvious conditions that would exclude the Town of Saugeen Shores from further consideration in the site selection process. The initial screening focused on the areas within the boundaries of the Town of Saugeen Shores.
    [Show full text]
  • BCPS1-Final Report.Pdf
    Emergency Service Planning Emergency Medical Services 2020 Report Base ORH/BCPS/1 ORH/BCPS/1 June 9, June Services Final Services and Paramedic County Paramedic of Bruce Review Comprehensive Deployment Deployment Comprehensive This document has been produced by ORH for Bruce County Paramedic Services on June 09, 2020. This document can be reproduced by Bruce County Paramedic Services, subject to it being used accurately and not in a misleading context. When the document is reproduced in whole or in part within another publication or service, the full title, date and accreditation to ORH must be included. ORH is the trading name of Operational Research in Health Limited, a company registered in England with company number 2676859. ORH’s quality management system is ISO 9001:2015 certified: recognition of ORH’s dedication to maintaining high quality services for its clients. ORH’s information security management system is ISO 27001:2017 certified: evidence of ORH’s commitment to implementing international best practice with regard to data security. This document is intended to be printed double-sided. As a result, some of the pages in the document are intentionally left blank. Disclaimer The information in this report is presented in good faith using the information available to ORH at the time of preparation. It is provided on the basis that the authors of the report are not liable to any person or organization for any damage or loss which may occur in relation to taking, or not taking, action in respect of any information or advice within the document. Accreditations Other than data provided by Bruce County Paramedic Services, this report also contains data from the following sources: © 2020 HERE All rights reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution of Fish Species at Risk
    Cape Chin Distribution of Fish Stokes River Species at Risk Chin Creek The Forty Hills Monument Corners White Bluff Grey Sauble Ira Lake Provincial Nature Reserve Park Whippoorwill Bay Cove of Cork Conservation Authority Lion's Head PoinMt cKay's Harbour Ira Lake Lions Head Provincial Nature Reserve Cape Croker Gun Point Benjamin's Point Lion's Head Barrier Island (Map 1 of 4) Baie GeorgiennGeeorgian Bay Geeshkaupikauhnssing Cliff Bruce Peninsula North Bay Swan Lake Drain Isthmus Bay Bruce Peninsula Bannister's Hill Lion's Head Harbour Makataewaukawauk Stokes River Barrow Bay Nayausheeng Cape Dundas Pine Tree Point Rush Cove The Little Prairie Garden Island Astrop's Hill Ferndale Melville Sound Partridge Point Little Lake Stokes Bay MacGregor Harbour Harbour Point Cape Croker Irish Harbour Jackson's Cove Ferguson Point Black Creek Centreville Old Woman's River Shute Point Shoal Cove Knife Islands Myles Bay Hopeness Cape Paulett Prairie PointThe Prairie Halfway Point Saxon Island Judges Creek Hope Bay Forest Provincial Nature Reserve Look About Bay Bruce Peninsula Georgian Bay McMaster PointParker Island Sydney Bay Bluff Clay Hills West Little Lake Hope Bay Hay Island Spry Dane Island Sydney Bay Jones Bluff Lyal Island Omeedjilawh Camp Kings Point Lake Edenhurst Cape Croker Park Little Port Elgin Cornet Point Kings Point Bluff South Point Huron Golden Island Gravelly Bay Griffith Island North Point Angle Ditch McIver Eastnor Swamp Coveney's Hill Little Pike Point Malcolm Bluff Patterson Cliffs Little Pike Bay Deepwater Point
    [Show full text]
  • October 2019 BPSA Reports
    October 2019 BPSA Reports Treasury Report for month of September, 2019 Treasurer – Corrie Beacock General account: Deposits $ 3,030.31 Expenses (1,423.50) Balance $34,597.45 Attached is list of expenditures and deposit. • Ways & Means balance is $4,528.09 • Deer feeding fund is $3,578.12. • RBG GIC Maturing December 1, 2022 is $25,000.00. • Total $67,703.66 9 8 Hydro One 403.53 Hatchery 9 5 Bank fee 8.50 Secretary 9 11 Storm Web 28.49 Web Hosting Murray Garniss - Fries Community 9 11 Living 62.12 Events 9 26 Community Living 48.20 Events Canadian Tire - prize Charles 9 26 Robinson 372.90 Events 9 26 OFAH Stu Patterson 121.90 OFAH 9 26 Longlands Appliances - Stove 789.89 Maintenance 9 3 interest 0.03 9 20 Bruce Trail invoice #110 3,030.25 10 1 0.03 3,030.31 1,423.50 BPSA MEMBERSHIP SUMMARY REVISON 2019 DATE SEPT 21/19 PAID NEW MEMBERS 73 PAID FAMILY MEMBERS 221 PAID YOUTH 3 TOTAL PAID MEMBERS 297 PAST MEMBERS NOT PAID 20 MEMBERS THAT GET MINUTES MAILED 8 PAID GUN CLUB MEMBERS 71 PAID ARCHERY MEMBERS 45 PAID ADULT MEMBERS 265 CHILDREN MEMBERS 32 ADULT QUORUM @10% IS 26.5 The new 2020 membership form is attached. Print and use or pick one up at the meeting. A google calendar is up and running in the members section of the website thanks to Kat. If your section has an event you want posted on the calendar contact Karen at [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Tour 1 the Other
    from an airport. He fired at two, hitting one and diverting grave and the bugler played the Last Post and Reveille. Tour 1 the other. Another two aircraft approached and he fired, There is a memorial to her at the St. George’s Church causing one to crash and the other to dive away. Billy parkette at Salvation Corners. Standing at the flag pole, walk east toward the entrance gate Bishop’s childhood home is now a museum located on 3rd to the water tap. Ave. West in Owen Sound. It is designated as a National Just beyond the vault lots, next to the ravine, is a grassy area Historic Site. C.B. – Companion of the Most Honourable with a few markers. This area has been referred to locally as The Carney monument is the grey stone that has Order of Bath; D.S.O. – Distinguished Service Order; M.C. “Pauper’s Field” or the “Indigent area.” It was determined in been carved to look like stones. Richard Carney – Military Cross; D.F.C. – Distinguished Flying Cross; E.D. 1858 that Block F of the People’s Cemetery was to be used came to Sydenham around 1843. He built a log – Efficiency Decoration. for those who could not pay for their burial, or for house on Marsh Street (2nd Ave. “strangers” who died within the limits of the town. East) and was named “Collector” for the The large white monument in front of the Bishop marker is port in 1844. He was also appointed for the Frost family. John Frost (1869) served as mayor of In this grassy area you will find several markers.
    [Show full text]
  • Bruce Grey Huron Perth Elgin Middlesex Oxford-Norfolk
    South West Local Health Integration Network Legend Tobermory Ü Ü Cities/Towns NORTHERN BRUCE PENINSULA First Nations X Local Health Integration Network office location u" Hospitals Major Highway Highway Lions Head Sub-LHIN boundaries u" Census Subdivisions South West LHIN boundary NEYAASHIINIGMIING 27 0 12.5 25 50 KM Pike Bay Ü Last Updated: 8/29/2014 SOUTH BRUCE PENINSULA Ü Big Bay North Simcoe Muskoka OliphantÜ u"Ü Chippewas of Nawash Unceded First Nation Ü Wiarton Kemble Ü Ü Sauble Falls Clavering Ü LindenwoodHogg Ü Sauble Beach North Ü GEORGIAN BLUFFS Sauble Beach Ü East Linton Ü Ü Ü Balmy Beach Leith Ü Ü Park Head Annan Meafor"d Ü Saugeen First Nation OWEN SOUND u Springmount Ü " SAUGEEN 29 Ü u Ü Jackson MEAFORD Ü Allenford Ü Ü Alvanley Rockford Clarksburg Elsinore Ü Ü Kilsyth Ü Bognor u" Southampton Walters Falls Ü Keady Ü THE BLUE MOUNTAINS Port Elgin Ü SAUGEEN SHORES Grimston Ü G rr e y ARRAN-ELDERSLIE Holland Centre CHATSWORTH Ü Berkeley Ü Mooresburg Ü Chesley Markdale B r u c e Ü Ü B r u c e Inverhuron u" Scone u" GREY HIGHLANDS Ü Kinhuron KINCARDINE WEST GREY Ü Ü Irish Lake Ü Ü Elmwood Slade Ceylon Ü Huron Ridge Ü Ü" u Cargill Ü Kincardine Priceville Ü Allan Park Millarton Ü Ü Durha"m BROCKTON u Ü HANOVER Ü Bervie Walkerton Ü " Pine River " u Ü u Lurgan Beach Carlsruhe Ü Ü Point Clark Ü Ripley HURON-KINLOSS Ayton Ü SOUTH BRUCE Central Belmore Ü Central West Ü HOWICK ASHFIELD-COLBORNE-WAWANOSH u"Wingham Ü Ü Wroxeter Fordwich Nile Ü NORTH HURON MORRIS-TURNBERRY Ü Carlow Ü Kurtzville Ü Ü Molesworth " Saltford Gowanstown Ü GODuERICH Ü EthelÜ Listoweu"l H u rr o n NORTH PERTH Waterloo Wellington CENTRAL HURON Ü Holmesville Ü Atwood Ü Clintou"n DonegalÜ Toronto Central HURON EAST Monkton Ü Newton Ü Harpurhey Ü Ü Seaforth Ü Brodhagen Ü Ü " Millbank Egmondville u Ü Bornholm Poole Ü BrunnerÜ Mississauga Halton Rostock Ü Ü BLUEWATER WEST PERTH PERTH EAST MitchelWl artburg Ü Gads Hill Ü Amulree Ü P e rr tt h Sebringville Ü Ü SOUTH HURON Ü Dashwood Ü STRu"ATFORD Exeteu"r Shakespeare Woodham Ü Ü Huron Park Ü St.
    [Show full text]
  • Food Is My Medicine-Climate Change FN.Pdf
    “My Food is My Medicine, My Medicine is My Food” First Nations and Metis People of Grey and Bruce: a forage into traditional food use, climate change and health. Grey Bruce Health Unit Acknowledgements This report was prepared for the Grey Bruce Health Unit by Krista Youngblood, Master of Public Health Graduate Student, University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada. The practicum placement was supported by a grant from the Canadian Institute of Health Research. The views expressed in this report are those of the Author and not necessarily represent those of the Grey Bruce Health Unit, the University of Waterloo or the Canadian Institute of Health Research. This project developed under the guidance of Alanna Leffley, Sr. Epidemiologist at the Grey Bruce Health Unit. Alanna was a valuable sounding board and provided thoughtful criticism that assisted my work greatly. Instrumental to this investigation were the people who were willing to share their stories with me. I thank you all, and look forward to seeing you again as I truly hope our paths will cross again. I have learned a great deal about the First People of this land, and the Metis Nation that was born from the merging of two worlds. I simply cannot express the gratitude I feel for the opportunity to learn so much and for feeling so welcome in your midst. Thank you to everyone who shared your stories with me. I simply do not have the words to express my gratitude and how much it meant to me personally. A special thank you to Victoria Serda, Lori Kewaquom, Lenore Keshig, Mary Miller, Michelle Desjardine, and Dee Miller for assisting me so willingly in this endeavor.
    [Show full text]
  • Best of the Bruce
    2017/2018 BEST OF THE BRUCE BRUCE COUNTY, ONTARIO BEST OF THE BRUCE 3 Explorers Welcome TABLE OF CONTENTS Find Yourself in Bruce County 4-5 Interior 46-57 In your hand is your ticket to explore Lucknow and Ripley 48-49 Peninsula 6-25 Walkerton and Area 50-51 Hike the path less traveled, breathe in gorgeous sunsets on sandy Tobermory 8-9 Paisley and Area 52-53 beaches, surge through forests on a bike or paddle in the Great Lion’s Head 10-11 Mountain Bike the Bruce 54-55 Lake! Bruce County is a place where children are encouraged to Wiarton 12-13 The Mighty Saugeen River 56-57 look under rocks, and parents help with the heavy lifting. Bruce Trail 14-15 Unique Experiences Abound in Bruce County MS Chi-Cheemaun 16-17 Visitor Information Centres 58 If you are scouting for hidden treasures, courting a cultural scene Scuba Diving and Snorkeling 18-19 or seeking an unmatchable camping experience, come unearth it Flowerpot Island 20-21 Festivals and Events 59 here. Your journey will be marked with inquiry and discovery. Dark Sky Astronomy 22-23 Plan your Journey Bouldering 24-25 Include some of the exclusive adventures available in our regions. Ideas for your shopping, dining and sleeping experiences and stellar Lakeshore 26-45 community activities are in this guide. Come… Sauble Beach 28-29 Southampton 30-31 Explore the “Best of” Bruce County Port Elgin 32-33 Kincardine 34-35 Kincardine Scottish Pipe Band Parade 36-37 Lighthouse Tours 38-39 Kiteboarding and Great Lakes Surfing 40-41 Kayaking in the Fishing Islands 42-43 Explore the Unforgettable 44-45 EXPLORETHEBRUCE.COM BEST OF THE BRUCE 5 Find Yourself in Bruce County Work / life - zero distance in between Starting a business in Bruce County is like setting up shop in a natural, entrepreneurial incubator.
    [Show full text]