DOCSLIB.ORG

Phase 1 Geoscientific Desktop Preliminary Assessment of Potential

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Phase 1 Geoscientific Desktop Preliminary Assessment of Potential Suitability for Siting a Deep Geological Repository for Canada’s Used Nuclear Fuel MUNICIPALITIES OF ARRAN-ELDERSLIE, BROCKTON AND SOUTH BRUCE, TOWNSHIP OF HURON-KINLOSS AND TOWN OF SAUGEEN SHORES, ONTARIO APM-REP-06144-0108 JUNE 2014 This report has been prepared under contract to the NWMO. The report has been reviewed by the NWMO, but the views and conclusions are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of the NWMO. All copyright and intellectual property rights belong to the NWMO. For more information, please contact: Nuclear Waste Management Organization 22 St. Clair Avenue East, Sixth Floor Toronto, Ontario M4T 2S3 Canada Tel 416.934.9814 Toll Free 1.866.249.6966 Email [email protected] www.nwmo.ca Phase 1 Geoscientific Desktop Preliminary Assessment of Potential Suitability for Siting a Deep Geological Repository for Canada’s Used Nuclear Fuel Municipalities of Arran-Elderslie, Brockton and South Bruce, Township of Huron-Kinloss and Town of Saugeen Shores Revision: 0 (Final) Prepared for: Nuclear Waste Management Organization 22 ST. Clair Avenue East, 6th Floor Toronto, Ontario M4T 2S3 Prepared by: Document ID: Sed Sites_Main Report_ June 30_R0 NWMO Report Number: APM-REP-06144-0108 June 2014 Geoscientific Desktop Suitability Assessment Study Sedimentary Sites, Southern Ontario Final Report Phase 1 Geoscientific Desktop Preliminary Assessment of Potential Suitability for Siting a Deep Geological Repository for Canada’s Used Title: Nuclear Fuel, Municipalities of Arran-Elderslie. Brockton and South Bruce, Township of Huron-Kinloss and Town of Saugeen Shores Client: Nuclear Waste Management Organization Document ID: Sed Sites_Main Report_ June 30_R0 Revision Number: 0 Date: June, 2014 Prepared by: Kenneth Raven Reviewed by: Sean Sterling Approved by: Kenneth Raven June, 2014 i Geoscientific Desktop Suitability Assessment Study Sedimentary Sites, Southern Ontario Final Report EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In Fall 2012, the municipalities of Arran-Elderslie, Brockton and South Bruce, the Township of Huron- Kinloss and the Town of Saugeen Shores (the Communities) expressed interest in continuing to learn more about the Nuclear Waste Management Organization (NWMO) nine-step site selection process, and requested that a preliminary assessment be conducted to assess potential suitability of each of the Communities for safely hosting a deep geological repository (Step 3). This request followed successful completion of initial screenings conducted during Step 2 of the site selection process. The preliminary assessment is a multidisciplinary study integrating both technical and community well- being studies, including geoscientific suitability, engineering, transportation, environment and safety, as well as social, economic and cultural considerations. The findings of the overall preliminary assessments of the Communities are reported in integrated preliminary assessment reports (NWMO, 2014a: 2014b: 2014c: 2014d: 2014e). This report presents the results of a geoscientific desktop preliminary assessment to determine whether the Communities contain general areas that have the potential to meet NWMO’s geoscientific site evaluation factors. The identification of potentially suitable areas focused on the areas within the boundaries of the Communities. Areas beyond the municipal boundaries of the five communities were not considered. For the purpose of the assessment, geoscientific information was collected and interpreted for the Communities and surrounding areas, referred to in this report as the “Area of the Five Communities”. The geoscientific preliminary assessment was conducted using available geoscientific information and geoscientific characteristics that can be realistically assessed at this early stage of the site evaluation process. These include: geology; structural geology; surface conditions; protected areas; and the potential for economically exploitable natural resources. The geoscientific desktop preliminary assessment included the following review and interpretation activities: • Assembly and detailed review of available geoscientific information such as geology, structural geology, natural resources, hydrogeology and overburden deposits (surficial deposits); • Interpretation of available geophysical surveys; • Interpretation of available borehole geophysical data and selected 2-D seismic reflection surveys to provide information on the geometry and potential structural features of the subsurface bedrock geology; • Terrain analysis studies to help assess overburden (surficial deposits) type and distribution, bedrock exposures, accessibility constraints, watershed and subwatershed boundaries, groundwater discharge and recharge zones; • Assessment of land use and protected areas including parks, conservation reserves, heritage sites and source water protection areas; and • The identification and evaluation of general potentially suitable areas based on systematic assessment of key geoscientific characteristics and constraints that can be realistically assessed at this stage of the assessment. The geoscientific desktop preliminary assessment showed that the geological setting in the Area of the Five Communities has a number of favourable characteristics for hosting a deep geological June, 2014 ii Geoscientific Desktop Suitability Assessment Study Sedimentary Sites, Southern Ontario Final Report repository for used nuclear fuel. However, the assessment revealed that there are areas that have more potential than others to satisfy NWMO’s geoscientific site evaluation factors. The assessment identified the Ordovician Cobourg Formation (limestone) as the preferred host rock formation for a used nuclear fuel deep geological repository. It was determined that a minimum depth of 500 metres below ground surface (mBGS) would be preferred in order to maintain the integrity of a repository within the Cobourg Formation. Based on the key geoscientific characteristics and constraints considered in the assessment, it was concluded that: • The Municipality of Brockton, the Municipality of South Bruce and the Township of Huron-Kinloss appear to contain large areas that have the potential to meet the geoscientific site evaluation factors outlined in the site selection process document. • The Municipality of Arran-Elderslie does not contain sufficient land areas that have the potential to meet the geoscientific site evaluation factors outlined in the site selection process document. • The Town of Saugeen Shores has very limited potential to contain areas that would meet the geoscientific site evaluation factors outlined in the site selection process document. While the the municipalities of Brockton and South Bruce, and the Township of Huron-Kinloss appear to contain large areas with favourable geoscientific characteristics, there are inherent uncertainties that would need to be addressed during subsequent stages of the site evaluation process. The assumption of transferability of geoscientific characteristics and understanding based on regional data and data from the Bruce nuclear site to the communities of Brockton, South Bruce and Huron-Kinloss would need to be confirmed. The potential for hydrocarbon resources and faults within the sedimentary sequence beneath the three communities would also need to be further assessed. Should the municipalities of Brockton and South Bruce, and the Township of Huron-Kinloss be selected by the NWMO to advance to Phase 2 study, and remain interested in continuing with the site selection process, several years of progressively more detailed studies would be required to confirm and demonstrate whether they contain sites that can safely contain and isolate used nuclear fuel. This may include the acquisition and interpretation of higher resolution geophysical surveys, detailed geological mapping, and the drilling of deep boreholes. June, 2014 iii Geoscientific Desktop Suitability Assessment Study Sedimentary Sites, Southern Ontario Final Report TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................................................... II 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Background ............................................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Geoscientific Desktop Preliminary Assessment Approach ................................................ 2 1.3 Geoscientific Site Evaluation Factors ................................................................................... 3 1.4 Available Geoscientific Information ...................................................................................... 3 1.4.1 Geology ........................................................................................................................ 4 1.4.2 DEM, Satellite Imagery and Geophysics ....................................................................... 5 1.4.3 2D Seismic Data ........................................................................................................... 7 1.4.4 Deep Borehole Data ..................................................................................................... 8 1.4.5 Hydrogeology and Hydrogeochemistry ......................................................................... 8 1.4.6 Natural Resources – Economic Geology ....................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Bulk Water Pricing Framework to Foster Sustainable Water Management in Ontario

    Bulk Water Pricing Framework to Foster Sustainable Water Management in Ontario

    Bulk Water Pricing Framework to Foster Sustainable Water Management in Ontario by Guneet Sandhu A thesis presented to the University of Waterloo in fulfillment of the thesis requirement for the degree of Master of Environmental Studies in Sustainability Management (Water) Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, 2018 © Guneet Sandhu 2018 Author’s Declaration I hereby declare that I am the sole author of this thesis. This is a true copy of the thesis, including any required final revisions, as accepted by my examiners. I understand that my thesis may be made electronically available to the public. ii Abstract Amidst rising concerns for sustainability of water resources, the province of Ontario has placed a temporary moratorium expiring on January 1, 2019 on bulk groundwater extraction by new water bottlers while considering broader reforms in water management policies. Given the projected impacts of climate change, coupled with population and economic growth, episodes of water scarcity are expected to rise in Ontario. Even though measures for sustainable water management are slowly gaining momentum, Ontario’s economy is likely to remain water- intensive with a burgeoning water demand. Therefore, to assure sustainability of water resources, proactive policies need to be developed that can effectively communicate water scarcity and change the consumption behavior of all water-using sectors. Bulk water pricing is an effective economic instrument to manage demand, incentivize use-efficiency and conservation by signaling to users the economic value of water. However, current water extraction charges imposed on few industrial sectors are very small, and hence insufficient not only to foster sustainable water use but also to recover the costs of various resource management initiatives undertaken by the Province of Ontario.
  • SPP Chapter 1: Background

    SPP Chapter 1: Background

    Approved Chapter 1 Background and Context Approved Source Protection Plan Saugeen, Grey Sauble, Northern Bruce Peninsula Source Protection Region Approved This page intentionally left blank. Approved Source Protection Plan Saugeen, Grey Sauble, Northern Bruce Peninsula Source Protection Region Approved 1.0 Background and Context 1.1 Source Protection Plans Source Protection Plans (SPP) enable Ontario communities to effectively protect their drinking water sources. The locally-developed plans are based on scientific studies and involve a collaborative approach with many opportunities for public input. The Source Protection Plan contains a series of policies that address activities and land uses. The policies reduce or eliminate risks within designated zones around municipal water intakes or municipal wells that are the source water for local municipal drinking water systems. 1.2 Objectives The objectives of the Source Protection Plan are: 1. To protect existing and future drinking water sources in the Source Protection Areas. 2. To ensure that, for every area identified in an Assessment Report as an area where an activity is or would be a significant drinking water threat: i. the activity never becomes a significant drinking water threat, or ii. if the activity is occurring when the Source Protection Plan takes effect, the activity ceases to be a significant drinking water threat 1.3 Clean Water Act The Clean Water Act was passed by the Ontario Legislature on October 18, 2006, and lays out how drinking water source protection is to be conducted. In Ontario, a multi-barrier approach protects municipal drinking water from source to tap as part of an overall commitment to safeguard human health and the environment.
  • Strategic Plan

    Strategic Plan

    STRATEGIC PLAN Municipality of Northern Bruce Peninsula June 2008 Revised July 2015 Municipality of Northern Bruce Peninsula Page 1 of 11 Strategic Plan Revised July 2015 MUNICIPALITY OF NORTHERN BRUCE PENINSULA STRATEGIC PLAN Northern Bruce Peninsula is a municipal corporation that commenced operations on January 1, 1999. It encompasses the former Townships of Eastnor, Lindsay and St. Edmunds and the Village of Lion’s Head. Many other hamlets within NBP are Tobermory, Stokes Bay, Pike Bay, Miller Lake, Barrow Bay, Ferndale, Dyers Bay and the Lindsay 20 communities. The Municipality of Northern Bruce Peninsula is the northerly neighbouring community to South Bruce Peninsula, Highway 6 traverses northerly through NBP. The peninsula itself is surrounded on the east by Georgian Bay and on the west by Lake Huron. We are home to Fathom Five National Marine Park, Bruce Peninsula National Park, the Bruce Trail, Niagara Escarpment, UNESCO World Biosphere, Cabot Head and Lion’s Head Nature Reserves, two First Nations Hunting Reserves and a large Bruce County Forest Tract. NBP covers an area of 781.51 square kilometers boasting a permanent population of 3,900 year round residents and just over 5000 households. The Public Works Department maintains 475 kilometres of roads and streets, some of which are paved, some gravelled. Some roads provide year round access while others enjoy only summer accessibility. In 2004, NBP was proclaimed as a “dark sky community” in the hope of preserving and protecting the night time environment and our heritage of dark skies through the use of quality outdoor lighting and goals established which are intended to stop the adverse effects of light pollution.
  • July 2019 Newsletter 2.Indd

    July 2019 Newsletter 2.Indd

    56 Lindsay Road 5 BY-LAW ENFORCEMENT FIRST NATIONS Lion’s Head, Ontario NBP’s By-law Enforcement Officer is available to LAND CLAIM UPDATE MUNICIPALITY OF N0H 1W0 address your concerns regarding noise, animal Recent articles and news stories advise that control, signage, property standards, zoning, preliminary court proceedings have commenced NORTHERN BRUCE parking, etc. Please write or call the By-law for the First Nations Land Claim. The Nawash and PENINSULA July 2019 Enforcement Officer at (519) 793-3522, X235 or by- Saugeen First Nations, who identify themselves Newsletter [email protected]. We handle complaints in collectively as the Saugeen Ojibway Nation (SON), MUNICIPALITY OF Telephone 519-793-3522 • Fax 519-793-3823 a confidential manner unless, of course, disclosure claim rights to territory which includes lands in the NORTHERN BRUCE PENINSULA Website: www.northbrucepeninsula.ca becomes necessary, then the informant may be Bruce Peninsula (being original unopened road required as a witness in court. allowances and unopened shore allowances) and much of the waters of Georgian Bay and Lake WHEN DO I NEED AN APPOINTMENT Huron. SHORT TERM ACCOMMODATIONS STUDY WITH THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT? The Municipality of Northern Bruce Peninsula is undertaking a study to examine The Chief Building Official (CBO), Wendy Elliott, As part of the claim, SON is seeking the return of Short Term Accommodations (STA’s) and consideration of policy development. will only be accepting appointments on Monday, the Bruce Peninsula lands still owned by Canada Tuesday and Wednesday mornings and Thursday and/or Ontario. The claim does NOT include Skelton Brumwell and Associates have been retained as project lead.
  • What's Important in Getting on the Destination Wish List

    What's Important in Getting on the Destination Wish List

    Ontario RTO7 Image Study Final Report February, 2011 Table of Contents Background and Purpose 3 Research Objectives 4 Method 5 Executive Summary 7 Conclusions & Implications 52 Detailed Findings 66 Destination Awareness and Visitation 67 Awareness, Past Visitation and Interest in Local Attractions 159 Awareness/Experience with Grey County Places/Attractions 160 Awareness/Experience with Bruce County Places/Attractions 178 Awareness/Experience with Simcoe County Places/Attractions 199 Interest in Types of Activities/Attractions/Events 220 Image Hot Buttons 243 RTO7’s Image vs. Competitors 246 Image Strengths & Weaknesses vs. Individual Competitors 280 Image Strengths & Weaknesses vs. Individual Competitors — Ontario Residents 320 RTO7’s Competitive Image in Each Region 355 RTO7’s Image by Region of Residence and Demographics 361 RTO7’s Product Delivery 382 Appendix: Questionnaire 389 2 Background & Purpose The Government of Ontario has recently realigned the province’s tourism regions. The new RTO7 region consists of Grey, Bruce and Simcoe Counties. The Region 7 RTO recognizes the importance of tourism to the welfare of the area and has expressed interest in development of a comprehensive strategic plan. As part of this process, Longwoods was engaged to carry out consumer research designed to provide Region 7 with market insights to inform brand strategy development aimed at increasing demand for the region among leisure visitors: Measuring familiarity and experience with the region/its attractions Measuring the region’s image and
  • Situation Report #258: COVID-19 Grey Bruce Health Unit | Incident Management System Nov

    Situation Report #258: COVID-19 Grey Bruce Health Unit | Incident Management System Nov

    Situation Report #258: COVID-19 Grey Bruce Health Unit | Incident Management System Nov. 30, 2020 Current Situation: Ontario Public Health Classification Level Yellow Stay Calm, Stay Kind, Stay Well Follow the 3 Ws – Washing hands frequently, Watching distance (ideally 6ft), and Wear face covering correctly, and the 2 As - Avoid Crowds and Arrange for outdoor activities instead of indoors whenever possible Testing and case counts reported as of 15:30 hrs, Nov. 30, 2020: 9 new case(s) reported in past 24 hours in Grey Bruce; Kincardine - 3, Arran-Elderslie - 2, Hanover – 1, Grey Highlands – 1, Southgate – 1, West Grey – 1 336 confirmed cases to date (current cumulative total) 50 active case(s) 7 – Active Probable Cases o Probable cases are not lab confirmed, but high-risk contacts of an active case, and also symptomatic 216 High Risk Contacts associated with active cases. 272 recovered cases; 15 cases referred to other health units 0 confirmed case(s) currently hospitalized in Grey Bruce 0 death(s) 37 cases reported in Health Care Workers working in Grey Bruce Active Outbreaks: 1 Facility(ies) in COVID-19 outbreak. Reported in Long-Term Care/Retirement Homes o Golden Dawn Senior Citizen Home (Long-Term Care) 0 Facility(ies) in COVID-19 outbreak. Reported in Schools 0 Facility(ies) in COVID-19 outbreak. Reported in Childcare Centres Actions Taken In the Past 24 Hours: Public Health has been actively engaged to support schools with ongoing updates and consultation meetings with local Boards and officials from all schools in Grey and Bruce GBHU COVID-19 Team continue with case and contact management, reporting, and responding to COVID-19 related calls.
  • Species at Risk Act

    Species at Risk Act

    Consultation on Amending the List of Species under the Species at Risk Act Terrestrial Species November 2011 Information contained in this publication or product may be reproduced, in part or in whole, and by any means, for personal or public non-commercial purposes, without charge or further permission, unless otherwise specified. You are asked to: Exercise due diligence in ensuring the accuracy of the materials reproduced; Indicate both the complete title of the materials reproduced, as well as the author organization; and Indicate that the reproduction is a copy of an official work that is published by the Government of Canada and that the reproduction has not been produced in affiliation with or with the endorsement of the Government of Canada. Commercial reproduction and distribution is prohibited except with written permission from the Government of Canada’s copyright administrator, Public Works and Government Services of Canada (PWGSC). For more information, please contact PWGSC at 613-996-6886 or at [email protected]. Cover photo credits: Olive Clubtail © Jim Johnson Peacock Vinyl Lichen © Timothy B. Wheeler Cerulean Warbler © Carl Savignac Title page photo credits: Background photo: Dune Tachinid Fly habitat © Sydney Cannings Foreground, large photo: Dwarf Lake Iris © Jessie M. Harris Small photos, left to right: Butler’s Gartersnake © Daniel W.A. Noble Hungerford’s Crawling Water Beetle © Steve Marshall Barn Swallow © Gordon Court Spring Salamander © David Green Available also on the Internet. ISSN: 1710-3029 Cat. no.: EN1-36/2011E-PDF © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, represented by the Minister of the Environment, 2011 Consultation on Amending the List of Species under the Species at Risk Act Terrestrial Species November 2011 Please submit your comments by February 8, 2012, for terrestrial species undergoing normal consultations and by November 8, 2012, for terrestrial species undergoing extended consultations.
  • Bruce Peninsula Press

    Bruce Peninsula Press

    Highway 26 East KIA OF OWEN SOUND 519-371-4447 across from Montana’s www.kiaowensound.ca 1-800-930-5616 Newsstand Price $1.50 + HST ruceThe eninsula ress B P P Since 1988 DELIVERING LOCAL NEWS TO THE NORTHERN BRUCE PENINSULA FOR 30 YEARS 2021 Number Two February 9 to March 9, 2021 Golden Dawn Residents and Staff Immunized With First Dose Of Covid-19 Vaccine By Joanne Rodgers, Bruce Peninsula Press Nora Foster, a seventy-one year old resident at Golden Dawn Senior Citizen Home in Lion’s Head became the first person to be vaccinated for COVID-19 in Northern Bruce. On 15 January 2021, Grey Bruce Health Unit administered approximately 79 shots of the first dose of the Pfizer BioNtech COVID-19 vaccine to residents, staff and some essential caregivers. (See Media Release from Public Health Grey Bruce page 8). Bert Niehof, an essential caregiver received the vaccine along with his hundred year old mother. He says it was a Photo Credit: Jasmine Brough, Bruce Peninsula Press fairly painless experience for both him and Forty Hills Ranch Llama Trekking in Support of Local Foodbank his mother. He was told to wait 15 minutes after being immunized to ensure he did Photo: The Forty Hills Ranch owners Keith and Mary Fowler with llamas (L-R) Skittles and Jazzy and alpaca Mr. not have an allergic reaction. A day later Gibbs. From February 9th - 23rd Forty Hills Ranch is offering llama trekking with all proceeds going to the Lion’s he reported that he felt a slight soreness Head Food Bank.
  • Annual Report 2015

    Annual Report 2015

    Annual Report 2015 Allan Park Conservation Area The Saugeen Valley Conservation Authority, In delivering its programs, Saugeen was established in 1950 under Ontario’s Conservation has acquired over 8,498 Conservation Authorities Act to further the ha (21,000 acres) of land for a variety of conservation, restoration, development purposes, ranging from the protection of and management of natural resources on important wetlands and significant forests a watershed scale, in partnership with its to the provision of recreation areas and 15 member municipalities, the Province of campgrounds. Ontario and its watershed residents. In addition to its main focus as a Saugeen Conservation is one of 36 conservation agency, Saugeen Conservation Conservation Authorities across Ontario and is involved in provincial conservation is a member of Conservation Ontario. issues, as a voting member of Conservation Ontario. SVCA’s watershed jurisdiction covers 4,632 sq. km (1,788 sq. miles), consisting of the drainage basins of the Saugeen, Penetangore and Pine Rivers, as well as those watercourses along the adjoining Lake Huron shoreline. Front cover photo of a young Great Horned Owl by David Bishop Welcome to the 2015 Annual Report It has been my pleasure to serve as Chair of the Saugeen Valley Conservation Authority for the year 2015. I came into this job understanding the importance of the Conservation Authority as a watershed regulatory agency and recognizing our basic mandate to protect the people and the property from flooding and the effects of erosion. It is essential for our region to maintain this Conservation Authority with the capacity to fulfill its mandate on a watershed- wide basis.
  • Sauble River Watershed Beaches Impact Study, 1986. Grey Sauble

    Sauble River Watershed Beaches Impact Study, 1986. Grey Sauble

    SAUBLE RIVER WATERSHED BEACHES IMPACT STUDY - 1986 - Prepared For: Ministry of the Environment Southwestern Region By: Grey Sauble Conservation Authority November 17, 1986 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page List of Figures i List of Tables i Abstract ii 1.0 Introduction 1 2.0 Background 1 2.1 The Watershed 1 2.2 Agricultural Land Use 4 2.3 Water Quality 5 3.0 Objectives 5 4.0 Methods 6 4.1 Water Sampling Program 6 4.2 Visual Survey 9 4.3 Information and education 9 5.0 Results 5.1 Water Sampling Program 10 5.1.1 Fecal Coliforms 11 5.1.2 Other Bacterial Parameters 16 5.1.3 Nutrients 17 5.2 Visual Survey 22 5.2.1 Unnamed Stream, Amabel Township, Station 009,010,011,012 22 5.2.2 Unnamed Stream, Amabel Township Station 007,008 24 5.2.3 Unnamed Stream, Amabel Township Station 003,004 27 5.2.4 Unnamed Stream, Amabel Township Station 028,029 29 5.2.5 Unnamed Stream, Amabel Township Station 025,026 31 5.3 Quantity and Variation of Flow 31 5.4 Information and Education 34 6.0 Conclusions 36 7.0 Recommendations 38 8.0 References 40 APPENDICES A. Introductory Letter to Landowners B. Newspaper Articles C. Sauble River Watershed Map LIST OF FIGURES Page Figure 1: Sauble River Watershed Study Area 2 Figure 2: Map of the Sauble River Watershed 3 Figure 3: Location of Water Sampling Sites 8 Figure 4: Average Fecal Coliform Concentrations - all stations 12 Figure 5: Average Fecal Coliform Concentrations - main river stations 13 Figure 6: Average Fecal Streptococci Concentrations 18 Figure 7: Average Total Phosphorous Concentrations - main river stations 19 Figure
  • Sauble Beach Community Toolkit

    Sauble Beach Community Toolkit

    Sauble Beach Toolkit 1 Sauble Beach Toolkit - Spruce The Bruce Launched in 2010, the Spruce the Bruce Program supports the revitalization of Bruce County downtowns. Spruce the Bruce has taken its genesis from the Main Street USA Four Point Approach®, which emphasizes Organization, Physical Design, Economic Development, Marketing and Promotion as integral components to successful downtowns. Using insights from tourism destination development, Spruce the Bruce supports local community efforts to bring stakeholders together through Brand development that will build successful destinations. The program supports communities through strategic policy and capital investment. This Community Toolkit tells a story about downtown Sauble Beach – what it has and where the community wants to go. Let’s Get Spruced! Sauble Beach Toolkit - Spruce The Bruce 3 Introduction Sauble Beach is the second longest fresh water beach in development of the modern beach area the world on the pristine shores of Lake Huron. dates from about 1948, including still-surviving Sauble Beach was originally named by the French attractions like the Driftwood restaurant, Sauble tobermory georgian bay explorers for the sandy sable river that empties into the Lodge Motel and the Crowd Inn hot-dog stand. The main lake at Sauble Falls. “La Riviere Au Sable” was its original street has remained relatively untouched in the past 50 lake huron lion’s head barrie collingwood name, which means “River to the Sand”. This title was years, drawing visitors back year after year and reminding owen sound markdale used on maps until 1881, when it was changed to them of simpler, more carefree days. shelburne hanover Sauble kincardine N “Sauble River.” Soon after, the beach was named “Sauble toronto Over the years Sauble Beach has received notable Beach listowel Beach” which when translated means Sand Beach or goderich Beach of Sand.
  • Census Release IV: Income

    Census Release IV: Income

    Census Release IV: Income October 6, 2017. For information, contact Shelby Huffman, x1306, or Virginia McFarland, x1522 Contents Data Sources ........................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Key Indicators .......................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Household Income .............................................................................................................................................................. 1 Household Income: Ten-Year Change ............................................................................................................................. 2 Individual Income ................................................................................................................................................................ 3 Individual Income: By Gender ......................................................................................................................................... 3 Employment Income ........................................................................................................................................................... 4 Employment Income: By Gender .................................................................................................................................... 4 Low Income ........................................................................................................................................................................