DOCSLIB.ORG

Biological Evaluation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Biological Evaluation BIOLOGICAL EVALUATION SKAGIT RIVER HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT LICENSE (FERC NO. 553) AMENDMENT: ADDITION OF A SECOND POWER TUNNEL AT THE GORGE DEVELOPMENT Final June 2011 BIOLOGICAL EVALUATION Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................. 1 1.1. Project Location .........................................................................................................2 1.2. Summary of Skagit River Project History ..................................................................2 1.2.1. Project Construction and Original License ................................................... 2 1.2.2. Settlement Agreement and Current License .................................................. 2 2 EXISTING PROJECT FACILITIES, OPERATIONS, AND MITIGATION AND CONSERVATION MEASURES ........................................................................................... 6 2.1. Existing Project Facilities ...........................................................................................6 2.1.1. Project Developments ................................................................................... 6 2.1.2. Diablo and Newhalem ................................................................................... 7 2.1.3. Project Transmission Lines ........................................................................... 7 2.2. Existing Operations – Reservoirs ...............................................................................8 2.2.1. Ross Lake ...................................................................................................... 8 2.2.2. Diablo Lake ................................................................................................... 8 2.2.3. Gorge Lake .................................................................................................... 9 2.3. Existing Operations – Downstream Flows .................................................................9 2.3.1. Salmon Spawning and Redd Protection ........................................................ 9 2.3.2. Salmon Fry Protection ................................................................................. 10 2.3.3. Steelhead Spawning and Redd Protection ................................................... 11 2.3.4. Steelhead Fry Protection ............................................................................. 11 2.3.5. Other Flow Management Measures ............................................................ 12 2.4. Existing Mitigation Measures ..................................................................................13 2.4.1. FSA Non-Flow Plan Measures .................................................................... 13 2.4.2. Wildlife Mitigation Measures ..................................................................... 16 2.5. Existing Conservation Measures for ESA-Listed Fish ............................................20 2.5.1. EAP Habitat Acquisition Projects ............................................................... 21 2.5.2. EAP Habitat Restoration Projects ............................................................... 21 2.5.3. EAP Research Projects ................................................................................ 21 3 PROPOSED ACTION .......................................................................................................... 27 3.1. Proposed New Facilities ...........................................................................................27 3.2. Proposed Project Operations as Amended ...............................................................33 3.3. Proposed Conservation Measures ............................................................................34 3.3.1. Additional Flow Measures .......................................................................... 34 3.3.2. Listed Fish Species Recovery Measures ..................................................... 35 3.4. Federal Action History Related to the Proposed Action ..........................................38 Skagit Hydroelectric Project Seattle City Light FERC No. 553 ii June 2011 BIOLOGICAL EVALUATION 4 ACTION AREA .................................................................................................................... 40 4.1. Aquatic Action Area .................................................................................................40 4.2. Terrestrial Action Area .............................................................................................40 4.3. Known Ongoing and Previous Federal Actions within the Action Area .................40 4.3.1. Skagit Basin Comprehensive Flood Hazard Management Plan (FEMA Authority) .................................................................................................... 41 4.3.2. Corp of Engineers Flood Control ................................................................ 41 4.3.3. Baker River Hydroelectric Project Relicensing .......................................... 42 5 LISTED SPECIES, RANGEWIDE STATUS, AND CRITICAL HABITAT ..................... 43 5.1. Species Description and Status ................................................................................43 5.1.1. Puget Sound Chinook Salmon ..................................................................... 43 5.1.2. Puget Sound Steelhead ................................................................................ 68 5.1.3. Bull Trout .................................................................................................... 72 5.1.4. Marbled Murrelet ........................................................................................ 84 5.1.5. Northern Spotted Owl ................................................................................. 86 5.1.6. Grizzly Bear ................................................................................................ 86 5.1.7. Gray Wolf .................................................................................................... 87 5.1.8. Canada Lynx ............................................................................................... 88 5.2. Critical Habitat Designations ...................................................................................88 5.2.1. Chinook Salmon .......................................................................................... 88 5.2.2. Steelhead ..................................................................................................... 88 5.2.3. Bull Trout .................................................................................................... 89 5.2.4. Marbled Murrelet ........................................................................................ 89 5.2.5. Northern Spotted Owl ................................................................................. 89 5.2.6. Grizzly Bear ................................................................................................ 89 5.2.7. Gray Wolf .................................................................................................... 89 5.2.8. Canada Lynx ............................................................................................... 89 6 ENVIRONMENTAL BASELINE AND CUMULATIVE EFFECTS ................................. 96 6.1. Status of Habitat Features within the Aquatic Action Area .....................................96 6.1.1. Water Quality .............................................................................................. 96 6.1.2. General Status of Fish Habitat in the Skagit Basin ................................... 104 6.1.3. Puget Sound Chinook Salmon ................................................................... 127 6.1.4. Puget Sound Steelhead .............................................................................. 128 6.1.5. Bull Trout .................................................................................................. 130 6.1.6. Cumulative Effects .................................................................................... 132 6.2. Status of Wildlife Habitat Features within the Terrestrial Action Area .................142 6.2.1. Marbled Murrelet ...................................................................................... 143 6.2.2. Northern Spotted Owl ............................................................................... 144 6.2.3. Grizzly Bear .............................................................................................. 145 6.2.4. Gray Wolf .................................................................................................. 145 Skagit Hydroelectric Project Seattle City Light FERC No. 553 iii June 2011 BIOLOGICAL EVALUATION 6.2.5. Canada Lynx ............................................................................................. 146 7 EFFECTS OF THE ACTION ............................................................................................. 147 7.1. Fish .........................................................................................................................147 7.1.1. Skagit Project Facilities as Amended ........................................................ 147 7.1.2. Skagit Operations as Amended ................................................................. 151 7.2. Wildlife ...................................................................................................................155 7.2.1. Gorge 2nd Tunnel .....................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Suspended-Sediment Concentration in the Sauk River, Washington, Water Years 2012-13
    Prepared in cooperation with the Sauk-Suiattle Indian Tribe Suspended-Sediment Concentration in the Sauk River, Washington, Water Years 2012-13 By Christopher A. Curran1, Scott Morris2, and James R. Foreman1 1 U.S. Geological Survey, Washington Water Science Center, Tacoma, Washington 2 Department of Natural Resources, Sauk-Suiattle Indian Tribe, Darrington, Washington Photograph of glacier-derived suspended sediment entering the Sauk River immediately downstream of the Suiattle River mouth (August 5, 2014, Chris Curran). iii Introduction The Sauk River is one of the few remaining large, glacier-fed rivers in western Washington that is unconstrained by dams and drains a relatively undisturbed landscape along the western slope of the Cascade Range. The river and its tributaries are important spawning ground and habitat for endangered Chinook salmon (Beamer and others, 2005) and also the primary conveyors of meltwater and sediment from Glacier Peak, an active volcano (fig. 1). As such, the Sauk River is a significant tributary source of both fish and fluvial sediment to the Skagit River, the largest river in western Washington that enters Puget Sound. Because of its location and function, the Sauk River basin presents a unique opportunity in the Puget Sound region for studying the sediment load derived from receding glaciers and the potential impacts to fish spawning and rearing habitat, and downstream river-restoration and flood- control projects. The lower reach of the Sauk River has some of the highest rates of incubation mortality for Chinook salmon in the Skagit River basin, a fact attributed to unusually high deposition of fine-grained sediments (Beamer, 2000b).
    [Show full text]
  • Skagit River Emergency Bank Stabilization And
    United States Department of the Interior FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE Washington Fish and Wildlife Office 510 Desmond Dr. SE, Suite 102 Lacey, Washington 98503 In Reply Refer To: AUG 1 6 2011 13410-2011-F-0141 13410-2010-F-0175 Daniel M. Mathis, Division Adnlinistrator Federal Highway Administration ATIN: Jeff Horton Evergreen Plaza Building 711 Capitol Way South, Suite 501 Olympia, Washington 98501-1284 Michelle Walker, Chief, Regulatory Branch Seattle District, Corps of Engineers ATIN: Rebecca McAndrew P.O. Box 3755 Seattle, Washington 98124-3755 Dear Mr. Mathis and Ms. Walker: This document transmits the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's Biological Opinion (Opinion) based on our review of the proposed State Route 20, Skagit River Emergency Bank Stabilization and Chronic Environmental Deficiency Project in Skagit County, Washington, and its effects on the bull trout (Salve linus conjluentus), marbled murrelet (Brachyramphus marmoratus), northern spotted owl (Strix occidentalis caurina), and designated bull trout critical habitat, in accordance with section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) (Act). Your requests for initiation of formal consultation were received on February 3, 2011, and January 19,2010. The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers - Seattle District (Corps) provided information in support of "may affect, likely to adversely affect" determinations for the bull trout and designated bull trout critical habitat. On April 13 and 14, 2011, the FHWA and Corps gave their consent for addressing potential adverse effects to the bull trout and bull trout critical habitat with a single Opinion.
    [Show full text]
  • 108Th Congress of the United States WASHINGTON CANADA
    108th Congress of the United States WASHINGTON CANADA 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 33 3 3 3 333333 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Osoyoos Nooksack 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Lake Trust Land 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 r 3 e 3 3 v 3 3 i 3 R 3 Birch 3 ck 3 Ross Strait of Georgia 3 sa 3 3 Bay ok 3 o 3 N 3 3 Nooksack 3 Lake 3 3 3 3 Trust Land 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 North Cascades 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 National Park 3 WHATCOM 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 PEND 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Lummi Nooksack Res 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Res 3 3 3 OREILLE 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Bellingham 3 3 3 Bay 3 33 3 3 Pend Oreille River 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Bellingham 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Ross Lake 3 3 Cowlitz 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 NRA 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Bay 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Okanogan River 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Samish 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 TDSA 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Samish 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Rosario Strait Bay 3 3 FERRY 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Upper Skagit Res 3 SAN JUAN 3 Haro Strait 3 North Cascades 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 National Park 3 OKANOGAN Upper Skagit Res 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Skagit River 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Padilla 3 3 3 3 Griffin Bay 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Bay 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 US Coast Guard Station 3 3 3 SKAGIT 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Neah Bay 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 STEVENS 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
    [Show full text]
  • The Skagit-High Ross Controversy: Negotiation and Settlement
    Volume 26 Issue 2 U.S. - Canada Transboundary Resource Issues Spring 1986 The Skagit-High Ross Controversy: Negotiation and Settlement Jackie Krolopp Kirn Marion E. Marts Recommended Citation Jackie K. Kirn & Marion E. Marts, The Skagit-High Ross Controversy: Negotiation and Settlement, 26 Nat. Resources J. 261 (1986). Available at: https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/nrj/vol26/iss2/6 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at UNM Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Natural Resources Journal by an authorized editor of UNM Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]. JACKIE KROLOPP KIRN* and MARION E. MARTS** The Skagit-High Ross Controversy: Negotiation and Settlement SETTING AND BACKGROUND The Skagit River is a short but powerful stream which rises in the mountains of southwestern British Columbia, cuts through the northern Cascades in a spectacular and once-remote mountain gorge, and empties into Puget Sound approximately sixty miles north of Seattle. The beautiful mountain scenery of the heavily glaciated north Cascades was formally recognized in the United States by the creation of the North Cascades National Park and the Ross Lake National Recreation Area in 1968, and earlier in British Columbia by creation of the E.C. Manning Provincial Park. The Ross Lake Recreation Area covers the narrow valley of the upper Skagit River in Washington and portions of several tributary valleys. It was created as a political and, to environmentalists who wanted national park status for the entire area, controversial, compromise which accom- modated the city of Seattle's Skagit River Project and the then-planned North Cascades Highway.
    [Show full text]
  • Schedule of Proposed Action (SOPA)
    Schedule of Proposed Action (SOPA) 01/01/2015 to 03/31/2015 Mt Baker-Snoqualmie National Forest This report contains the best available information at the time of publication. Questions may be directed to the Project Contact. Expected Project Name Project Purpose Planning Status Decision Implementation Project Contact R6 - Pacific Northwest Region, Regionwide (excluding Projects occurring in more than one Region) Aquatic Invasive Species order - Wildlife, Fish, Rare plants In Progress: Expected:04/2015 05/2015 James Capurso to prevent the spread or Scoping Start 05/05/2014 208-557-5780 introduction of aquatic invasive [email protected] species Description: The purpose of this order is to prevent the spread or introduction of aquatic invasive plant or animal species. CE Public involvement is targeted for the Umatilla, Willamette, Mt. Baker-Snoqualmie, Gifford Pinchot, and Colville NFs. Web Link: http://www.fs.fed.us/nepa/nepa_project_exp.php?project=44360 Location: UNIT - R6 - Pacific Northwest Region All Units. STATE - Oregon, Washington. COUNTY - Asotin, Clark, Columbia, Cowlitz, Ferry, Garfield, King, Klickitat, Lewis, Pend Oreille, Pierce, Skagit, Skamania, Snohomish, Stevens, Walla Walla, Whatcom, Baker, Clackamas, Douglas, Grant, Jefferson, Lane, Linn, Marion, Morrow, Umatilla, Union, Wallowa, Wheeler. LEGAL - Not Applicable. Order will apply to all Forests in Region 6, however targeted scoping is with the Umatilla, Gifford Pinchot, Mt. Baker/Snoqualmie, Willamette and Colville NFs tribal and public scoping lists. Mt Baker-Snoqualmie National Forest, Forestwide (excluding Projects occurring in more than one Forest) R6 - Pacific Northwest Region Invasive Plant Management - Vegetation management In Progress: Expected:04/2015 05/2015 Phyllis Reed EIS (other than forest products) NOI in Federal Register 360-436-2332 02/28/2012 [email protected] Est.
    [Show full text]
  • The Damnation of a Dam : the High Ross Dam Controversy
    THE DAMYIATION OF A DAM: TIIE HIGH ROSS DAM CONTROVERSY TERRY ALLAN SIblMONS A. B., University of California, Santa Cruz, 1968 A THESIS SUBIUTTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS in the Department of Geography SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY May 1974 All rights reserved. This thesis may not b? reproduced in whole or in part, by photocopy or other means, without permission of the author. APPROVAL Name: Terry Allan Simmons Degree: Master of Arts Title of Thesis: The Damnation of a Dam: The High Ross Dam Controversy Examining Committee: Chairman: F. F. Cunningham 4 E.. Gibson Seni Supervisor / /( L. J. Evendon / I. K. Fox ernal Examiner Professor School of Community and Regional Planning University of British Columbia PARTIAL COPYRIGHT LICENSE I hereby grant to Simon Fraser University rhe righc to lcnd my thesis or dissertation (the title of which is shown below) to users of the Simon Fraser University Library, and to make partial or single copies only for such users or in response to a request from the library of any other university, or other educational institution, on its own behalf or for one of its users. I further agree that permission for multiple copying of this thesis for scholarly purposes may be granted by me or the Dean of Graduate Studies. It is understood that copying or publication of this thesis for financial gain shall not be allowed ' without my written permission. Title of' ~hesis /mqqmkm: The Damnation nf a nam. ~m -Author: / " (signature ) Terrv A. S.imrnonze (name ) July 22, 1974 (date) ABSTRACT In 1967, after nearly fifty years of preparation, inter- national negotiations concerning the construction of the High Ross Dan1 on the Skagit River were concluded between the Province of British Columbia and the City of Seattle.
    [Show full text]
  • Mt Baker-Snoqualmie National Forest EA CE
    Schedule of Proposed Action (SOPA) 07/01/2007 to 09/30/2007 Mt Baker-Snoqualmie National Forest This report contains the best available information at the time of publication. Questions may be directed to the Project Contact. Expected Project Name Project Purpose Planning Status Decision Implementation Project Contact Projects Occurring Nationwide Aerial Application of Fire - Fuels management In Progress: Expected:08/2007 08/2007 Christopher Wehrli Retardant 215 Comment Period Legal 202-205-1332 EA Notice 07/28/2006 [email protected] Description: The Forest Service proposes to continue the aerial application of fire retardant to fight fires on National Forest System lands. An environmental analysis will be conducted to prepare an Environmental Assessment on the proposed action. Web Link: http://www.fs.fed.us/fire/retardant/index.html Location: UNIT - All Districts-level Units. STATE - All States. COUNTY - All Counties. Nation Wide. R6 - Pacific Northwest Region, Occurring in more than one Forest (excluding Regionwide) Aquatic Outfitter and Guide - Special use management Developing Proposal Expected:08/2008 01/2009 Don Gay Special Use Permits Est. Scoping Start 11/2007 360-856-5700 CE [email protected] Description: Issuance of special use permits for outfitter and guides using the N.F. Nooksack, Skagit, Sauk, Skykomish, and Cispus Rivers. Location: UNIT - Mt Baker Ranger District, Darrington Ranger District, Skykomish Ranger District, Cowlitz Ranger District. STATE - Washington. COUNTY - Lewis, Skagit, Snohomish, Whatcom. LEGAL - T40NR6E, T39NR6 and 7E, T39NR7E, T35NR8,9,10E, T36NR11E, T31-35NR10E, T32NR9E, T27NR9 and 10E, T11NR5,6,7, and 8E. N. F. Nooksack, Skagit, Sauk, Skykomish, and Cispus Rivers.
    [Show full text]
  • Yakama-Cowlitz Trail: Ancient and Modern Paths Across the Mountains
    COLUMBIA THE MAGAZINE OF NORTHWEST HISTORY ■ SUMMER 2018 Yakama-Cowlitz Trail: Ancient and modern paths across the mountains North Cascades National Park celebrates 50 years • Explore WPA Legacies A quarterly publication of the Washington State Historical Society TWO CENTURIES OF GLASS 19 • JULY 14–DECEMBER 6, 2018 27 − Experience the beauty of transformed materials • − Explore innovative reuse from across WA − See dozens of unique objects created by upcycling, downcycling, recycling − Learn about enterprising makers in our region 18 – 1 • 8 • 9 WASHINGTON STATE HISTORY MUSEUM 1911 Pacific Avenue, Tacoma | 1-888-BE-THERE WashingtonHistory.org CONTENTS COLUMBIA The Magazine of Northwest History A quarterly publication of the VOLUME THIRTY-TWO, NUMBER TWO ■ Feliks Banel, Editor Theresa Cummins, Graphic Designer FOUNDING EDITOR COVER STORY John McClelland Jr. (1915–2010) ■ 4 The Yakama-Cowlitz Trail by Judy Bentley OFFICERS Judy Bentley searches the landscape, memories, old photos—and President: Larry Kopp, Tacoma occasionally, signage along the trail—to help tell the story of an Vice President: Ryan Pennington, Woodinville ancient footpath over the Cascades. Treasurer: Alex McGregor, Colfax Secretary/WSHS Director: Jennifer Kilmer EX OFFICIO TRUSTEES Jay Inslee, Governor Chris Reykdal, Superintendent of Public Instruction Kim Wyman, Secretary of State BOARD OF TRUSTEES Sally Barline, Lakewood Natalie Bowman, Tacoma Enrique Cerna, Seattle Senator Jeannie Darneille, Tacoma David Devine, Tacoma 14 Crown Jewel Wilderness of the North Cascades by Lauren Danner Suzie Dicks, Belfair Lauren14 Danner commemorates the 50th22 anniversary of one of John B. Dimmer, Tacoma Washington’s most special places in an excerpt from her book, Jim Garrison, Mount Vernon Representative Zack Hudgins, Tukwila Crown Jewel Wilderness: Creating North Cascades National Park.
    [Show full text]
  • Seasonal Distribution and Habitat Associations of Salmonids With
    Seasonal Distribution and Habitat Associations of Salmonids with Extended Juvenile Freshwater Rearing in Different Precipitation Zones of the Skagit River, WA January, 2020 Erin D. Lowery1*, Jamie N. Thompson1, Ed Connor2, Dave Pflug2, Bryan Donahue1, Jon- Paul Shannahan3 Introduction a freshwater rearing period lasting more than one Anadromous salmonids (Salmonidae spp.) year (Quinn 2005, SRSC and WDFW 2005). experience a variety of freshwater and marine As climate change progresses, the timing and habitats through the completion of their life cycle. magnitude of hydrologic cycles are expected to shift Certain life stages and habitats have been associated significantly, and these changes could dramatically with critical periods of growth or survival, wherein affect the overall capacity of watersheds to support the growth performance achieved within the critical anadromous salmonids as well as the spatial- period is highly and positively correlated to survival temporal distribution of habitats that support the through subsequent life stages. Alternatively, positive growth trajectories that improve the survival disproportionately high or variable mortality might of these fishes (Battin et al. 2007; Schindler et al. be associated with these periods, but the variability 2008). Pacific salmonids, Oncorhynchus and in mortality is strongly mediated by growth or Salvelinus spp., that rely on extended freshwater environmental conditions (Beamish and Mahnken rearing like steelhead O. mykiss, spring, summer, and 2001). The timing and location of these critical fall Chinook salmon O. tshawytscha, Coho salmon O. periods can vary considerably among species, kisutch, Sockeye salmon O. nerka, and Bull Trout S. populations, among years within populations, and confluentus are likely to be more vulnerable to could operate on the growth performance achieved climatic shifts in hydrology and thermal regime than in either freshwater (e.g., Steelhead, Ward et al.
    [Show full text]
  • WASHINGTON Where We Are
    nationalatlas.gov TM WASHINGTON Where We Are FEDERAL LANDS AND CANADA Str ait INDIAN RESERVATIONS of Ge org ia BRITISH COLUMBIA Bureau of Indian Affairs Blaine Mount Baker Bureau of Land Management / Oroville Helicopter Training Mount North Wilderness Area Baker Lummi IR Cascades Colville Colville NF NP Ross Lake Okanogan San Juan Islands National Forest R NF Bureau of Reclamation Bellingham NRA NF Cusick NWR R Okanogan a S Conconully Republic i Survival tr National Forest Lake b Training Kaniksu Department of Defense ai San Juan Island Mount Baker North t o Anacortes Skagit NRA m Site NF f NHP Cascades Little Pend Oreille (includes Army Corps of Engineers lakes) Jua Swinomish IR Conconully u n NP l NWR de Reservoir Omak Makah F o uca Whidbey Island NAS Mount Vernon Mount Baker Lake Kalispel IR Department of Energy IR Helicopter Training Area Chelan C Colville Flattery Rocks NWR Naval NRA Colville NF Kaniksu Ebey's Landing NHR Reservation Ozette IR Lower Elwha IR Indian Reservation NF Fish and Wildlife Service / Wilderness Lakewood Mount Baker Newport Olympic Port Angeles Dungeness Olympic Protection Island National Forest Lake Roosevelt NP NWR Tulalip IR NF NWR National Recreation Area Forest Service / Wilderness Everett Forks Olympic NF Wenatchee Grand Coulee Spokane Quileute IR National Forest Olympic Port Gamble IR IR National Park Service / Wilderness National Park d Lynnwood Snoqualmie Port Madison IR n Chelan Hoh IR u NF Banks Wilbur o S Lake Spokane t Seattle Some small sites are not shown, especially in R e Opportunity t g ul Bremerton Leavenworth Coulee City u Bellevue urban areas.
    [Show full text]
  • EDR Inc.EDR Inc
    8 40 1 6 0 0 8 0 11 2 5 1 k 40 V 0 4 8 0 40 8 0 80 0 2 0 4 0 4 1 8 0 40 3 46 0 4 40 160 1 2 2 120 80 8 0 160 0 2 0 0 2 4 0 40 2 8 0 3 2 0 2 8 3 6 0 0 0 0 8 6 1 0 0 8 0 0 2 2 2 3 0 0 240 4 0 0 2 0 1 4 0 0 6 6 3 1 320 80 0 2 1 0 4 2 0 0 8 8 2 0 0 2 0 0 4 0 2 3 0 6 1 0 4 2 0 2 1 0 0 2 EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc. 40 0 40 EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc. MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY Search Distance Target Total Database(Miles) Property < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Federal NPL site list NPL 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 Proposed NPL 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 NPL LIENS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 Federal Delisted NPL site list Delisted NPL 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 Federal CERCLIS list FEDERAL FACILITY 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 SEMS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site list SEMS-ARCHIVE 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list CORRACTS 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list RCRA-TSDF 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 Federal RCRA generators list RCRA-LQG 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 RCRA-SQG 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 RCRA-CESQG 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries LUCIS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 US ENG CONTROLS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 US INST CONTROL 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 Federal ERNS list ERNS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 State- and tribal - equivalent NPL HSL 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS CSCSL 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists SWF/LF 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 State and tribal leaking storage tank lists LUST 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR
    [Show full text]
  • Dietary Characteristics of Juvenile Trout and Char in Seasonally Inundated Stream Segments in Ross Lake, Washington
    Western Washington University Western CEDAR WWU Graduate School Collection WWU Graduate and Undergraduate Scholarship 2014 Dietary characteristics of juvenile trout and char in seasonally inundated stream segments in Ross Lake, Washington Emily Derenne Western Washington University Follow this and additional works at: https://cedar.wwu.edu/wwuet Part of the Environmental Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Derenne, Emily, "Dietary characteristics of juvenile trout and char in seasonally inundated stream segments in Ross Lake, Washington" (2014). WWU Graduate School Collection. 382. https://cedar.wwu.edu/wwuet/382 This Masters Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the WWU Graduate and Undergraduate Scholarship at Western CEDAR. It has been accepted for inclusion in WWU Graduate School Collection by an authorized administrator of Western CEDAR. For more information, please contact [email protected]. DIETARY CHARACTERISTICS OF JUVENILE TROUT AND CHAR IN SEASONALLY INUNDATED STREAM SEGMENTS IN ROSS LAKE, WASHINGTON By Emily Derenne Accepted in Partial Completion Of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science Kathleen L. Kitto, Dean of the Graduate School ADVISORY COMMITTEE Chair, Dr. Leo Bodensteiner Dr. James Helfield Ashley K. Rawhouser MASTER’S THESIS In presenting this thesis in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a master’s degree at Western Washington University, I grant to Western Washington University the non-exclusive royalty-free right to archive, reproduce, distribute, and display the thesis in any and all forms, including electronic format, via any digital library mechanisms maintained by WWU. I represent and warrant this is my original work, and does not infringe or violate any rights of others.
    [Show full text]