DOCSLIB.ORG

U N S U U S E U R a C S

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

108th Congress of the United States C A N A D A CANADA Blaine Nooksack Trust Land Sumas Semiahmoo Bay 9 e Drayton t R Harbor t StRte 546 (Badger Rd) S Lynden Birch Bay Peaceful N o o Valley ks ac Nooksack Trust Land k R iv er Birch Bay Nooksack StRte 548 (Blaine Rd) Custer Everson Kendall Maple Falls StRte 548 (Grandview Rd) StRte 544 (Pole Rd) StRte 9 Strait of Georgia Glacier Nooksack Lake Terrell Trust Land Nooksack Trust Land ) y w Ferndale 2 H 4 r 5 e e k t a R t B Deming t S North Cascades Natl Pk n WHATCOM u o Ross (M Lake Nooksack Res StRte 542 Nooksack Trust Marietta- Land Alderwood OKANOGAN 5 Nooksack Trust Land Echo Bay Lummi Bellingham Res Boundary Pass President Channel Geneva Baker Lake Hales Passage StRte 9 (Valley Hwy) Sudden Hwy) es Bellingham cad Valley Acme as Bay 20 (C Ross Lake Natl Rec Area te R S t Cowlitz Bay Lake DISTRICT Chuckanut Whatcom Bay 5 New Channel Lake Samish S t West H w Alger y 1 Sound 1 Haro Strait ( C h East u S c tH k w Sound a y n Samish Bay u 2 Harney t 0 D Channel B ( San Juan Channel r) S e Lake Shannon t l R l i d n Samish TDSA 2 g 0 h ) Rosario Strait SAN JUAN a r m e Upright Upper v Rosario Strait i Channel C Skagit R h Edison a Res it Friday Lopez Sound n g nel a k Harbor S Friday Upper Skagit Res Hamilton Concrete North Cascades Natl Pk Lyman Harbor Guemes Channel StHwy 20 Ska Marblemount Sedro-Woolley git R iver Fidalgo Griffin Bay Bay Anacortes SKAGIT Rockport Padilla Bay View Bay Burrows Burlington Bay 0 StHwy 2 StH Clear Lake P w y Similk u (Memoria 5 StHwy 538 g l 36 Bay e H w t (College Wy) Lake Campbell y S ) Swinomish o u Mount Res n r S d e t Vernon H iv w R t y i 5 g 0 La Conner 3 a Big Lake 2 0 k d S R t S S tH Big Lake w y 9 Lake Chelan Natl Rec Area Oak Harbor Nas (Whidbey Island) Ault DISTRICT StHwy 534 S Field u Conway Lake Cavanaugh ia t t l Skagit Bay Lake McMurray Sauk-Suiattle Res e Oak Harbor Lake Cavanaugh 2 R i ve r Oak Harbor Nas (Whidbey Crescent Island) Sauk-Suiattle Res Harbor S t Lake H w StR Oso Ketchum y te 5 9 30 Oak N Fork S River Harbor North 5 till ish Stanwood a guam Strait of Juan de Fuca Darrington ISLAND Stanwood Penn Cove Lake Saratoga Chelan Passage S 20 Camano Arlington t R te Coupeville Stillaguamish Res Heights Silvana Dungeness Bay Crockett Lake Warm Smokey Point Beach Arlington Lake Goodwin Lake Goodwin Port Jordan Road-Canyon Creek Townsend Port Townsend Bay Cathan Stimson Crossing Marrowstone Weallup John North 101 Carlsborg Port Sequim Lake Sam Marysville Angeles East Kilisut Harbor Lake Verlot 5 Granite Falls 2 5 Tulalip StHwy 9 e Holmes t 0 Res River Road 2 R Harbor t y Sequim Discovery Bay S Shaker Bell w Lochsloy Bay H Church t Tulalip Marysville Hill S 101 Bay Lake Lake Bosworth SNOHOMISH Port Langley Priest Stevens Jamestown S’Klallam Res Hadlock- Point Irondale Jamestown S’Klallam Trust Land Blyn Freeland Possession Lake Oak Sound Stevens DISTRICT Bay S West Lake t H Machias Roesiger 4 w Lake y 1 Everett Naval Sta Stevens 9 Lake Roesiger ( CLALLAM B Spada Lake e Clinton a v 2 e Mukilteo r V a JEFFERSON l l Everett DISTRICT e 5 Northwest Three Everett y Olympic Natl Pk R Snohomish CHELAN d Lakes 6 ) Meadow Wy 19th Ave SE 84th St S SW Snohomish t L H ow S w 100th e n Port ll y 1 100th L o 04 St SW ar St SE im h North e o Ludlow Paine Field- r R m Sultan d Woods Lake Stickney i s h R Creek Gold i Startup Seattle Hill- v 148th St SE e Bar Squamish Silver Firs r Harbor Picnic Point- Mill Port North Lynnwood Legend Gamble Creek Sultan Sky Res Connelly komish R May Creek Cathcart Monroe iv Rd e Martha S Lewis St r Quilcene Lake Fish Lake Lake Wenatchee Edmonds Lynnwood North 2 DISTRICT Bay Quilcene 2 Crescent Lake Rd y 5 Index Alderwood Creek StHw 2 2 Crescent StHwy 203 Manor Esperance Lake Rd StHwy 99 Maltby Kingston Woodway Brier DISTRICT Mountlake Terrace Echo 1 Bothell Lake Lake High Bridge Rd Cherry Cr Shoreline Forest Woodinville Snoqualmie R Park Baring 101 Indianola Cottage Lake CANADA Poulsbo Port Madison Res Puget Dabob Bay Sound DISTRICT Kenmore 2 Suquamish Port 1 Madison ) Duvall Trident Port y Submarine Bay 2 Kingsgate vens Pass Hwy L’Anse Res Madison 2 W Inglewood- Ste Base (Bangor) 5 ) y t Res e e i Finn Hill t v C Liberty R A Bangor t e k S Bay a Trident r Skykomish a Brinnon o r L Keyport ( Base u Torpedo A ( Kirkland Redmond Zuni Trust Land Sta 9 Lake Marcel-Stillwater 9 Seattle Union Hill- e Support Activity t 405 R (Seattle Nas) Fort Lawton t Yarrow Novelty Hill Military Res S Samish TDSA Hood Canal Point S t H wy Silverdale 202 StRte 52 Carnation KANSAS Bainbridge Lake Union 0 S 3 Island t Hunts H y Clyde OKLAHOMA Seattle Naval w w Point KITSAP Supply Center Hill Ames y H Dyes t (Puget Sound) 2 Camp Wesley Harris Naval Res S Inlet 5 Lake 0 Tracyton Medina Bellevue 3 ERIE Seattle Lake Beaux Calligan Lake Washington Arts Erlands Point- Rich Group Seattle - West Lake P a Coast Guard Village Kitsap Lake s Sammamish s Sammamish a Naval Hospital Bremerton g Lake Sammamish Leavenworth e Bremerton Shipyard (Puget Sound) Bremerton Camp McKean Regional Fall City Md Ctr Eastgate Naval Rec Ctr S t H Bremerton Shipyard (Puget Sound) Naval wy Res 202 i Navy Yard City DISTRICT M ddle Manchester Fo Mercer 90 Issaquah rk S no Turley Bremerton 7 Island qu Snoqualmie al Newcastle mi Riverton- e R Boulevard Park S Parkwood S tR t White R te Port Orchard t 9 e Tukwila KING StHwy 160 9 KITTITAS Center 5 0 Bryn 8 Lake Cushman MASON East 9 Mawr- 1 North Bend y Port Long Lake Skyway w H t Orchard East Renton S Tanner Justice Highlands 97 S Burien StHwy 169 Mirrormont Riverbend Location of Washington’s 2nd Congressional District - 9 Districts Total t Renton H DISTRICT w Cascade- y Fairwood 1 125 W 124 W 123 W 122 W 121 W 120 W 119 W 118 W117 W DISTRICT 6 Normandy SeaTac 8 Fort Belvoir 3 ( S d Park L t R 49 N CANADA a H t 6 ke w S C y u 1 5 s 1 6 h 9 0 m 1 Vashon East Hill- Maple Heights- a d Snoqualmie Pass n tR Meridian Lake Desire Rd S ) 8 Hobart Yosemite NP 1 North Quartermaster y 90 Bay w Harbor H Chester Morse Lake St StRte 302 Kent Camp Maple Sealth Des Gig Moines Covington Valley 6 Allyn- S Interstate Hwy Other0 Major Road DISTRICT Ravensdale 1 t 48 N 48 N Water Body 44 d Grapeview Harbor H StR w Keechelus Lake Other Road 9 y 1 5 ASON Skokomish Res Mason Lake 6 U.S. Hwy Henderson Bay Lakeland Lake Morton- 9 IDAHO Stream Skokomish 56 Railroad Federal Auburn Lea 1 North Hill Berrydale Artondale Way Black Diamond 6 Kachess 7 Lake * The Census Bureau works with either tribal governments or state officials to define statistical S tRte 18 entities for federal and state recognized American Indian and Alaska Native tribes that have no 90 8 legally defined land base. These entities are portrayed on this map with the name of the entity Muckleshoot Res and a point symbol. Ruston 47 N Case Algona 47 N 9 Inlet US Naval Sta Lakeland South 4 (Pearl St) StRte 163 Commencement Bay Howard Hanson Reservoir Pacific ) 9 Cle Elum e 6 v Lake 97 Carr Inlet Tacoma 1 A Fox Island Muckleshoot Res y h t Pacific w Pickering Passage 4 Ronald H 6 t Easton S 2 S Ocean ( Roslyn t 3 R Oakland Bay (PacificAve) Milton Edgewood PIERCE 509 StRte t Muckleshoot Trust Land UNSUUSECSBEe U RA Shelton Fife 1 6 Fircrest 7 Lake University Place Puyallup Res Tapps StHwy 164 46 N 46 N (436th St) Cle Elum 7 Waller Sumner StRte 9 0 Midland Enumclaw Puyallup Trust Land 90 0 5 10 Kilometers Helping You Make Informed Decisions 0 ( 41 En N South Cle Elum Lakewood Puyallup y u w m S cl t Steilacoom tH a R Carr Inlet S w Ch OREGON Summit Bonney Lake i t 0 5 10 Miles 2 n McChord StRte o e Totten Inlet DISTRICT 6 Buckley ok AFB 1 Prairie 410 P 1 Fort Lewis ass Rd) Greenwater 0 Military Res StHwy 512 (StRd 512) e 124 W 123 W 122 W 121 W 120 W 119 W 118 W 117 W 9 Parkland t Ridge South R Puget t Eld Inlet McChord AFB Prairie Squaxin Island Trust Land Sound South Hill S THURSTON DuPont Fort Lewis.
Recommended publications
  • Gary's Charts

    Gary's Charts

    Gary’s Garage Sale - Chart List Chart Number Chart Name Area Scale Condition Price 3410 Sooke Inlet West Coast Vancouver Island 1:20 000 Good $ 10.00 3415 Victoria Harbour East Coast Vancouver Island 1:6 000 Poor Free 3441 Haro Strait, Boundary Pass and Sattelite Channel East Vancouver Island 1:40 000 Fair/Poor $ 2.50 3441 Haro Strait, Boundary Pass and Sattelite Channel East Vancouver Island 1:40 000 Fair $ 5.00 3441 Haro Strait, Boundary Pass and Sattelite Channel East Coast Vancouver Island 1:40 000 Poor Free 3442 North Pender Island to Thetis Island East Vancouver Island 1:40 000 Fair/Poor $ 2.50 3442 North Pender Island to Thetis Island East Vancouver Island 1:40 000 Fair $ 5.00 3443 Thetis Island to Nanaimo East Vancouver Island 1:40 000 Fair $ 5.00 3459 Nanoose Harbour East Vancouver Island 1:15 000 Fair $ 5.00 3463 Strait of Georgia East Coast Vancouver Island 1:40 000 Fair/Poor $ 7.50 3537 Okisollo Channel East Coast Vancouver Island 1:20 000 Good $ 10.00 3537 Okisollo Channel East Coast Vancouver Island 1:20 000 Fair $ 5.00 3538 Desolation Sound & Sutil Channel East Vancouver Island 1:40 000 Fair/Poor $ 2.50 3539 Discovery Passage East Coast Vancouver Island 1:40 000 Poor Free 3541 Approaches to Toba Inlet East Vancouver Island 1:40 000 Fair $ 5.00 3545 Johnstone Strait - Port Neville to Robson Bight East Coast Vancouver Island 1:40 000 Good $ 10.00 3546 Broughton Strait East Coast Vancouver Island 1:40 000 Fair $ 5.00 3549 Queen Charlotte Strait East Vancouver Island 1:40 000 Excellent $ 15.00 3549 Queen Charlotte Strait East
  • Ecosystem Status and Trends Report for the Strait of Georgia Ecozone

    Ecosystem Status and Trends Report for the Strait of Georgia Ecozone

    C S A S S C C S Canadian Science Advisory Secretariat Secrétariat canadien de consultation scientifique Research Document 2010/010 Document de recherche 2010/010 Ecosystem Status and Trends Report Rapport de l’état des écosystèmes et for the Strait of Georgia Ecozone des tendances pour l’écozone du détroit de Georgie Sophia C. Johannessen and Bruce McCarter Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Institute of Ocean Sciences 9860 W. Saanich Rd. P.O. Box 6000, Sidney, B.C. V8L 4B2 This series documents the scientific basis for the La présente série documente les fondements evaluation of aquatic resources and ecosystems scientifiques des évaluations des ressources et in Canada. As such, it addresses the issues of des écosystèmes aquatiques du Canada. Elle the day in the time frames required and the traite des problèmes courants selon les documents it contains are not intended as échéanciers dictés. Les documents qu’elle definitive statements on the subjects addressed contient ne doivent pas être considérés comme but rather as progress reports on ongoing des énoncés définitifs sur les sujets traités, mais investigations. plutôt comme des rapports d’étape sur les études en cours. Research documents are produced in the official Les documents de recherche sont publiés dans language in which they are provided to the la langue officielle utilisée dans le manuscrit Secretariat. envoyé au Secrétariat. This document is available on the Internet at: Ce document est disponible sur l’Internet à: http://www.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/csas/ ISSN 1499-3848 (Printed / Imprimé) ISSN 1919-5044 (Online / En ligne) © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, 2010 © Sa Majesté la Reine du Chef du Canada, 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS Highlights 1 Drivers of change 2 Status and trends indicators 2 1.
  • Status and Distribution of Marine Birds and Mammals in the Southern Gulf Islands, British Columbia

    Status and Distribution of Marine Birds and Mammals in the Southern Gulf Islands, British Columbia

    Status and Distribution of Marine Birds and Mammals in the Southern Gulf Islands, British Columbia. Pete Davidson∗, Robert W Butler∗+, Andrew Couturier∗, Sandra Marquez∗ & Denis LePage∗ Final report to Parks Canada by ∗Bird Studies Canada and the +Pacific WildLife Foundation December 2010 Recommended citation: Davidson, P., R.W. Butler, A. Couturier, S. Marquez and D. Lepage. 2010. Status and Distribution of Birds and Mammals in the Southern Gulf Islands, British Columbia. Bird Studies Canada & Pacific Wildlife Foundation unpublished report to Parks Canada. The data from this survey are publicly available for download at www.naturecounts.ca Bird Studies Canada British Columbia Program, Pacific Wildlife Research Centre, 5421 Robertson Road, Delta British Columbia, V4K 3N2. Canada. www.birdscanada.org Pacific Wildlife Foundation, Reed Point Marine Education Centre, Reed Point Marina, 850 Barnet Highway, Port Moody, British Columbia, V3H 1V6. Canada. www.pwlf.org Contents Executive Summary…………………..……………………………………………………………………………………………1 1. Introduction 1.1 Background and Context……………………………………………………………………………………………………..2 1.2 Previous Studies…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..5 2. Study Area and Methods 2.1 Study Area……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………6 2.2 Transect route……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..7 2.3 Kernel and Cluster Mapping Techniques……………………………………………………………………………..7 2.3.1 Kernel Analysis……………………………………………………………………………………………………………8 2.3.2 Clustering Analysis………………………………………………………………………………………………………8 2.4
  • Technical Appendix B: System Description

    Technical Appendix B: System Description

    TECHNICAL APPENDIX B: SYSTEM DESCRIPTION Assessment of Oil Spill Risk due to Potential Increased Vessel Traffic at Cherry Point, Washington Submitted by VTRA TEAM: Johan Rene van Dorp (GWU), John R. Harrald (GWU), Jason R.. W. Merrick (VCU) and Martha Grabowski (RPI) August 31, 2008 Vessel Traffic Risk Assessment (VTRA) - Final Report 08/31/08 TABLE OF CONTENTS B-1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................4 B-2. Waters of the Vessel Traffic Risk Assessment...................................................................4 B-2.1. Juan de Fuca-West:........................................................................................................4 B-2.2. Juan de Fuca-East:.........................................................................................................5 B-2.3. Puget Sound ...................................................................................................................5 B-2.4. Haro Strait-Boundary Pass...........................................................................................6 B-2.5. Rosario Strait..................................................................................................................6 B-2.6. Cherry Point...................................................................................................................6 B-2.7. SaddleBag........................................................................................................................7
  • Spring Bloom in the Central Strait of Georgia: Interactions of River Discharge, Winds and Grazing

    Spring Bloom in the Central Strait of Georgia: Interactions of River Discharge, Winds and Grazing

    MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES Vol. 138: 255-263, 1996 Published July 25 Mar Ecol Prog Ser I l Spring bloom in the central Strait of Georgia: interactions of river discharge, winds and grazing Kedong yinl,*,Paul J. Harrisonl, Robert H. Goldblattl, Richard J. Beamish2 'Department of Oceanography, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6T 124 'pacific Biological Station, Department of Fisheries and Oceans, Nanaimo, British Columbia, Canada V9R 5K6 ABSTRACT: A 3 wk cruise was conducted to investigate how the dynamics of nutrients and plankton biomass and production are coupled with the Fraser River discharge and a wind event in the Strait of Georgia estuary (B.C.,Canada). The spring bloom was underway in late March and early Apnl, 1991. in the Strait of Georgia estuary. The magnitude of the bloom was greater near the river mouth, indicat- ing an earher onset of the spring bloom there. A week-long wind event (wind speed >4 m S-') occurred during April 3-10 The spring bloom was interrupted, with phytoplankton biomass and production being reduced and No3 in the surface mixing layer increasing at the end of the wind event. Five days after the lvind event (on April 15),NO3 concentrations were lower than they had been at the end of the wind event, Indicating a utilization of NO3 during April 10-14. However, the utilized NO3 did not show up in phytoplankton blomass and production, which were lower than they had been at the end (April 9) of the wind event. During the next 4 d, April 15-18, phytoplankton biomass and production gradu- ally increased, and No3 concentrations in the water column decreased slowly, indicating a slow re- covery of the spring bloom Zooplankton data indicated that grazing pressure had prevented rapid accumulation of phytoplankton biomass and rapid utilization of NO3 after the wind event and during these 4 d.
  • British Columbia Regional Guide Cat

    British Columbia Regional Guide Cat

    National Marine Weather Guide British Columbia Regional Guide Cat. No. En56-240/3-2015E-PDF 978-1-100-25953-6 Terms of Usage Information contained in this publication or product may be reproduced, in part or in whole, and by any means, for personal or public non-commercial purposes, without charge or further permission, unless otherwise specified. You are asked to: • Exercise due diligence in ensuring the accuracy of the materials reproduced; • Indicate both the complete title of the materials reproduced, as well as the author organization; and • Indicate that the reproduction is a copy of an official work that is published by the Government of Canada and that the reproduction has not been produced in affiliation with or with the endorsement of the Government of Canada. Commercial reproduction and distribution is prohibited except with written permission from the author. For more information, please contact Environment Canada’s Inquiry Centre at 1-800-668-6767 (in Canada only) or 819-997-2800 or email to [email protected]. Disclaimer: Her Majesty is not responsible for the accuracy or completeness of the information contained in the reproduced material. Her Majesty shall at all times be indemnified and held harmless against any and all claims whatsoever arising out of negligence or other fault in the use of the information contained in this publication or product. Photo credits Cover Left: Chris Gibbons Cover Center: Chris Gibbons Cover Right: Ed Goski Page I: Ed Goski Page II: top left - Chris Gibbons, top right - Matt MacDonald, bottom - André Besson Page VI: Chris Gibbons Page 1: Chris Gibbons Page 5: Lisa West Page 8: Matt MacDonald Page 13: André Besson Page 15: Chris Gibbons Page 42: Lisa West Page 49: Chris Gibbons Page 119: Lisa West Page 138: Matt MacDonald Page 142: Matt MacDonald Acknowledgments Without the works of Owen Lange, this chapter would not have been possible.
  • Burrard Inlet Underwater Noise Study

    Burrard Inlet Underwater Noise Study

    Vancouver Fraser Port Authorit Burrard Inlet underwater noise study: 2020 final report ECHO Program study summary This study was undertaken for the Vancouver Fraser Port Authority-led Enhancing Cetacean Habitat and Observation (ECHO) Program and project partner Tsleil-Waututh Nation with financial support from Transport Canada to learn more about underwater noise and cetacean presence in Burrard Inlet. Building upon the 2019 monitoring project in Burrard Inlet, this project set out to monitor underwater noise and the presence of cetaceans (whales, dolphins and porpoise) in Burrard Inlet, a marine mammal habitat and a key waterway for commercial shipping, port-related activities, and passenger transportation. This document summarizes the project question and describes the methods, key findings, and conclusions. What questions was the study trying to answer? The second year of the Burrard Inlet underwater noise study sought to evaluate longer-term trends in total ambient noise and marine mammal presence, while building upon the results from 2019. Who conducted the project? SMRU Consulting North America (SMRU) was awarded the contract for the 2019 monitoring program, and was retained by Vancouver Fraser Port Authority to continue monitoring though 2020 at fewer sampling locations. What methods were used? Bottom-mounted SoundTrap hydrophone recorders were deployed in two locations in the inner and outer harbour: one at Burrard Inlet East near the Tsleil-Waututh Nation reserve lands and Burnaby petroleum terminals, and one in English Bay between anchorages 1 and 3. Acoustic data were collected over approximately one year between February 2020 and February 2021. The figure below shows the approximate locations of the hydrophone deployments.
  • Design Basis for the Living Dike Concept Prepared by SNC-Lavalin Inc

    Design Basis for the Living Dike Concept Prepared by SNC-Lavalin Inc

    West Coast Environmental Law Design Basis for the Living Dike Concept Prepared by SNC-Lavalin Inc. 31 July 2018 Document No.: 644868-1000-41EB-0001 Revision: 1 West Coast Environmental Law Design Basis for the Living Dike Concept West Coast Environmental Law Research Foundation and West Coast Environmental Law Association gratefully acknowledge the support of the funders who have made this work possible: © SNC-Lavalin Inc. 2018. All rights reserved. i West Coast Environmental Law Design Basis for the Living Dike Concept EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Background West Coast Environmental Law (WCEL) is leading an initiative to explore the implementation of a coastal flood protection system that also protects and enhances existing and future coastal and aquatic ecosystems. The purpose of this document is to summarize available experience and provide an initial technical basis to define how this objective might be realized. This “Living Dike” concept is intended as a best practice measure to meet this balanced objective in response to rising sea levels in a changing climate. It is well known that coastal wetlands and marshes provide considerable protection against storm surge and related wave effects when hurricanes or severe storms come ashore. Studies have also shown that salt marshes in front of coastal sea dikes can reduce the nearshore wave heights by as much as 40 percent. This reduction of the sea state in front of a dike reduces the required crest elevation and volumes of material in the dike, potentially lowering the total cost of a suitable dike by approximately 30 percent. In most cases, existing investigations and studies consider the relative merits of wetlands and marshes for a more or less static sea level, which may include an allowance for future sea level rise.
  • A Nitrogen Budget for the Strait of Georgia, British Columbia, with Emphasis on Particulate Nitrogen and Dissolved Inorganic Nitrogen

    A Nitrogen Budget for the Strait of Georgia, British Columbia, with Emphasis on Particulate Nitrogen and Dissolved Inorganic Nitrogen

    Biogeosciences, 10, 7179–7194, 2013 Open Access www.biogeosciences.net/10/7179/2013/ doi:10.5194/bg-10-7179-2013 Biogeosciences © Author(s) 2013. CC Attribution 3.0 License. A nitrogen budget for the Strait of Georgia, British Columbia, with emphasis on particulate nitrogen and dissolved inorganic nitrogen J. N. Sutton1,2, S. C. Johannessen1, and R. W. Macdonald1 1Institute of Ocean Sciences, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, 9860 West Saanich Road, P.O. Box 6000, Sidney, British Columbia, V8L 4B2, Canada 2Department of Earth and Planetary Science, University of California, Berkeley, California, 94720, USA Correspondence to: J. N. Sutton ([email protected]) Received: 6 March 2013 – Published in Biogeosciences Discuss.: 23 April 2013 Revised: 29 September 2013 – Accepted: 10 October 2013 – Published: 12 November 2013 Abstract. Balanced budgets for dissolved inorganic N (DIN) 1 Introduction and particulate N (PN) were constructed for the Strait of Georgia (SoG), a semi-enclosed coastal sea off the west coast of British Columbia, Canada. The dominant control on the The nitrogen (N) cycle is a crucial underpinning of marine N budget is the advection of DIN into and out of the SoG biological productivity (Gruber and Galloway, 2008). Dur- via Haro Strait. The annual influx of DIN by advection from ing the past 150 yr, the global N cycle has been dramati- the Pacific Ocean is 29 990 (±19 500) Mmol yr−1. The DIN cally changed by human activities that have loaded reactive N flux advected out of the SoG is 24 300 (±15 500) Mmol yr−1. into ecosystems in amounts that rival natural sources (Rabal- Most of the DIN that enters the SoG (∼ 23 400 Mmol yr−1) ais, 2002; Galloway et al., 2004).
  • Salish Sea Ambient Noise Study: Best Practices (2021)

    Salish Sea Ambient Noise Study: Best Practices (2021)

    Salish Sea Ambient Noise Study: Best Practices (2021) This work was sponsored and financially supported by the Vancouver Fraser Port Authority. Transport Canada provided additional financial support. For bibliographic purposes, this document should be cited as follows: Eickmeier, J., Tollit, D., Trounce, K., Warner, G., Wood, J., MacGillivray, A. and Zizheng Li (2021) Salish Sea Ambient Noise Study: Best Practices (2021). Vancouver, British Columbia, Vancouver Fraser Port Authority, Enhancing Cetacean Habitat and Observation (ECHO) Program. Authors: Justin Eickmeier1, Dominic Tollit2, Krista Trounce3, Graham Warner4, Jason Wood5, Alex MacGillivray6 and Zizheng Li7 1) Justin M. Eickmeier is a Consulting Scientist at SLR Consulting (Canada) Ltd., Vancouver, British Columbia, V6J 1V4 ([email protected]) 2) Dominic J. Tollit is the Principal Scientist at SMRU Consulting North America, Vancouver, British Colunbia, V6B 1A1 ([email protected]) 3) Krista B. Trounce is the Research Manager for the ECHO Program, Vancouver Fraser Port Authority, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6C 3T4 ([email protected]) 4) Graham Warner is a Project Scientist for JASCO Applied Sciences (Canada) Ltd. 5) Jason Wood is Operations Manager & Senior Research Scientist at SMRU Consulting North America 6) Alex MacGillivray is a Senior Scientist for JASCO JASCO Applied Sciences (Canada) Ltd. 7) Zizheng Li is a Project Scientist for JASCO JASCO Applied Sciences (Canada) Ltd. Table of Contents Abstract ............................................................................................................................................................................................
  • 108Th Congress of the United States WASHINGTON CANADA

    108Th Congress of the United States WASHINGTON CANADA

    108th Congress of the United States WASHINGTON CANADA 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 33 3 3 3 333333 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Osoyoos Nooksack 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Lake Trust Land 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 r 3 e 3 3 v 3 3 i 3 R 3 Birch 3 ck 3 Ross Strait of Georgia 3 sa 3 3 Bay ok 3 o 3 N 3 3 Nooksack 3 Lake 3 3 3 3 Trust Land 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 North Cascades 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 National Park 3 WHATCOM 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 PEND 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Lummi Nooksack Res 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Res 3 3 3 OREILLE 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Bellingham 3 3 3 Bay 3 33 3 3 Pend Oreille River 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Bellingham 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Ross Lake 3 3 Cowlitz 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 NRA 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Bay 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Okanogan River 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Samish 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 TDSA 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Samish 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Rosario Strait Bay 3 3 FERRY 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Upper Skagit Res 3 SAN JUAN 3 Haro Strait 3 North Cascades 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 National Park 3 OKANOGAN Upper Skagit Res 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Skagit River 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Padilla 3 3 3 3 Griffin Bay 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Bay 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 US Coast Guard Station 3 3 3 SKAGIT 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Neah Bay 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 STEVENS 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
  • The Skagit-High Ross Controversy: Negotiation and Settlement

    The Skagit-High Ross Controversy: Negotiation and Settlement

    Volume 26 Issue 2 U.S. - Canada Transboundary Resource Issues Spring 1986 The Skagit-High Ross Controversy: Negotiation and Settlement Jackie Krolopp Kirn Marion E. Marts Recommended Citation Jackie K. Kirn & Marion E. Marts, The Skagit-High Ross Controversy: Negotiation and Settlement, 26 Nat. Resources J. 261 (1986). Available at: https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/nrj/vol26/iss2/6 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at UNM Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Natural Resources Journal by an authorized editor of UNM Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]. JACKIE KROLOPP KIRN* and MARION E. MARTS** The Skagit-High Ross Controversy: Negotiation and Settlement SETTING AND BACKGROUND The Skagit River is a short but powerful stream which rises in the mountains of southwestern British Columbia, cuts through the northern Cascades in a spectacular and once-remote mountain gorge, and empties into Puget Sound approximately sixty miles north of Seattle. The beautiful mountain scenery of the heavily glaciated north Cascades was formally recognized in the United States by the creation of the North Cascades National Park and the Ross Lake National Recreation Area in 1968, and earlier in British Columbia by creation of the E.C. Manning Provincial Park. The Ross Lake Recreation Area covers the narrow valley of the upper Skagit River in Washington and portions of several tributary valleys. It was created as a political and, to environmentalists who wanted national park status for the entire area, controversial, compromise which accom- modated the city of Seattle's Skagit River Project and the then-planned North Cascades Highway.