DOCSLIB.ORG

2011 University of Delaware Watermelon Pollenizer Trial Introduction Materials and Methods

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2011 University of Delaware Watermelon Pollenizer Trial Introduction Materials and Methods 2011 University of Delaware Watermelon Pollenizer Trial Gordon Johnson & Emmalea Ernest University of Delaware Elbert N. & Ann V. Carvel Research and Education Center 16483 County Seat Highway Georgetown, DE 19947 (302) 856-7303 [email protected] [email protected] Introduction The purpose of the 2011 Watermelon Pollenizer Trial was to evaluate both special pollenizer varieties and regular diploid watermelon varieties in an in-row planting arrangement with standard seedless watermelons. Ten special pollenizer varieties, and five Allsweet type diploid varieties were tested. As a control, a treatment in which no pollenizer was planted was also included. Variety/Treatment Name Source Company Pollenizer Type Summer Flavor 800 Abbot & Cobb Allsweet Type Tropical Harris Moran Allsweet Type Encore Hollar Seeds/Seedway Allsweet Type Sangria Rogers-Syngenta Allsweet Type Stargazer Seminis Allsweet Type POL - 10319 Abbot & Cobb Special Pollenizer POL - 4290 Abbot & Cobb Special Pollenizer POL - 4370 Abbot & Cobb Special Pollenizer POL - 4400 Abbot & Cobb Special Pollenizer Accomplice Harris Moran Special Pollenizer Sidekick Harris Moran Special Pollenizer Polimax Nunhems Special Pollenizer sp-4 Syngenta Special Pollenizer sp-5 Syngenta Special Pollenizer PollenPro Zeraim Gedera/Siegers Special Pollenizer No Pollenizer Materials and Methods Plot Set-Up The trial was set up in a randomized complete block design with four replications. Black plastic mulch beds were laid on 7’ centers. A total of 32 rows of mulch were laid with a 30’ drive row between every 8 beds. Each of the four sections of eight rows was treated as one block. The third and seventh row out of each 8-row section was a treatment row. The remaining rows were planted in triploid watermelons without pollenizers and served as border rows. The Abbot & Cobb variety SS 9651, which has a solid medium-green rind, was used in the first, second and eighth row of each section, to make it easy to distinguish the melons from the border rows from those of the treatment plots. The fourth, fifth and sixth rows of each section were planted in Liberty, as a part of another study. Each treatment row contained eight plots. Plots were 27’ long and contained ten triploid plants spaced at 3’ and four pollenizer plants which were planted between the regularly spaced triploid plants as shown below. Note that the control treatment did not have pollenizers. The Crimson Sweet-type triploid varieties used in the trial were Melody and SS 7187. Five plants of each variety were planted in each plot. Plots were separated from one another within the row by 15’. The space between each plot and the next was planted with five plants of SS 9651. Plots were separated from one another between rows by three rows of triploid plants with no pollenizers and at least 28’. Layout of a Part of One Eight-Row Section Border Row: SS 9651 spaced at 3 ft Border rows continue S S 9 6 5 1 Border Row: SS 9651 spaced at 3 ft S S 9 6 5 1 Treatment Row 6 more plots B B B B B P S S S P S S M P M M M P M B B B B B P S S S P S S M P M M M P M B B Border Row: Liberty spaced at 3 ft L i b e r t y Border Row: Liberty spaced at 3 ft L i b e r t y Border Row: Liberty spaced at 3 ft L i b e r t y Treatment Row 6 more plots B B B B B P S S S P S S M P M M M P M B B B B B P S S S P S S M P M M M P M B B Border Row: SS 9651 spaced at 3 ft S S 9 6 5 1 B=border plant of SS 9651, P=pollenizer plant, S=SS 7187 plant, M=Melody plant Location Field 1 at the University of Delaware Research and Education Center Farm, Georgetown, DE. Cultural Practices Field was fertilized according to soil test results. On April 21, 2011, 50 lbs/A of nitrogen (30% UAN)+Sinbar 2 oz/A+Prefar 6 qt/A+Profine 75 0.5 oz/A was applied after the beds had been shaped and before black plastic mulch and trickle irrigation were laid on 7’ centers. Plants were seeded in the greenhouse on April 13, 2011. The triploid plants were transplanted to the field on May 17, 2011, and the pollenizers were transplanted on May 18. An application of Gramoxone 1.5 qt/A +Sandea 0.5 oz/A +Crop Oil Concentrate at 1% v/v was made to the row middles on June 3 with a hooded sprayer. Vines were turned before this application as they had just started to run off of the plastic. Tapout 16 oz/A was applied on July 15, 2011 to control grass. Applications for disease and insect control were as follows: Chloronil at 3 pt/A on 6-17, 6-25, 7-1, 7-8, 7-16, 7-23, 7-30, 8-7, 8-20 and 8-25; Pristine at 18.5 oz/A on 7- 1 and 7-30; Previcur Flex at 1.2 pt/A on 8-7; Inspire Super at 20 oz/A on 7-16, 7-23 and 8-20; Presidio at 3 oz/A on 8-25; Oberon at 8.5 oz/A on 7-1 and 8-7; Radiant at 8 oz/A on 7-1; Asana XL at 9.6 oz/A on 7-16; and Warrior II at 1.9 oz/A on 7-30. The trial was fertigated on June 5 with UAN to supply 40 lbs/A N; on June 23 with 8-2-8 to supply 40 lbs/A N, 10 lbs/A P, and 40 lbs/A K; and on August 2 with 8-2-8 to supply 50 lbs/A N, 13 lbs/A P, and 50 lbs/A K. Data Collection The following data were collected on June 10 and 13 and again on June 17 for one SS 7187 plant, one Melody plant, and the Allsweet-type pollenizers from each plot in replications 1 through 3: number of stems, stem length, and female flower location (node number) and stage of development (set, aborted, open, not yet open). Stem number, vine length, and number of open male flowers were recorded for one pollenizer plant from each plot in replications 1 through 3. Leaf surface temperature was measured for one Melody plant, one SS 7187 plant and one pollenizer plant in each plot on June 10 and 13. Melons from the treatment plots were harvested four times: July 27, August 8, August 24 and September 7. All ripe melons were harvested from the SS 7187, Melody and Allsweet-type diploid pollenizer varieties. The weight of each watermelon harvested was recorded individually and each melon was designated as marketable or unmarketable based on fruit shape. On each harvest date up to three melons from each variety (SS 7187, Melody or Allsweet-type diploid) plot were cut and evaluated for presence of hollow heart and soluble solids levels. Obviously unmarketable melons (>7 lbs or misshapen) were not used for hollow heart and soluble solids testing. Soluble solids were measured using a hand-held refractometer and hollow heart cracks were measured at their widest point with a metric ruler. On August 25, we estimated the yield of melons from the border rows that were associated with each pollenizer plot. Melons were counted if they were of marketable size and shape and were located on the soil space on either side of the treatment plot or on top of the mulched bed of the treatment plot. Results Yield of seedless melons was analyzed as a split-plot design with pollenizer treatment, seedless variety, and block as variables (Table 1). Six different measures of yield of seedless melons were analyzed: Total Yield, in terms of number of melons and weight of melons; Marketable Yield I, which excluded misshapen culls and melons less than 7 lbs, in terms of number of melons and weight of melons; and Marketable Yield II, which excluded misshapen culls, melons less than 7 lbs, and melons more than 24 lbs, in terms of number of melons and weight of melons. Pollenizer treatment was a significant source of variation in yield by all measures. The yield effects of the different pollenizer treatments are further analyzed and discussed in the following sections of this report. The interaction between seedless variety and pollenizer treatment did not have a significant effect on yield by any of measures used. This means that although Melody is an earlier maturing variety than SS 7187, pollenizer varieties performed equally well with both seedless varieties in terms of season-long yield. For some measures of yield there was a significant effect for block and the interaction between pollenizer treatment and block. We observed that the block located closest to the bee hives had higher yields and more melons set in the treatment with no pollenizer plants. As with most field experiments, variation in soil conditions are also likely to be partially responsible for the block effects. Seedless variety was a significant source of variation in yield, by all measures, as SS 7187 produced significantly higher yields than Melody. Pollenizer Effects on Season-Long Yield By all measures of yield, the treatment with no pollenizer produced significantly lower yields than any of the treatments with pollenizers (Table 2). The triploid plants in these plots also had excessive vine growth due to low fruit set.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Planting and Aftercare of New Trees
    Where to start? • Fruit plants that fit into to small spaces Producing Fruit for the Home – Apple … on dwarfing rootstocks • Most traditional and local garden centers do not identify specific rootstock ….”Dwarf”, “Semi Dwarf” Ron Perry • Eventual tree size within Dwarf and Semi Dwarf is large Professor Tree Spacing Nursery ID Hort. Department Rootstocks Eventual Height Between Trees Between Rows MSU M.27 or P.22 Dwarf 6 5 10 M.9 Dwarf 8 8 12 M.26 Dwarf 16 10 16 M.7 Semi Dwarf 18 14 22 MM.106 or 111 Semi Dwarf 20 16 22 Where to start? Where to start? • Fruit plants that fit into to small spaces – Cherry - Sour • Select desired fruit which will grow in your area. Tree Spacing Rootstocks • Determine how much space you have available. Varieties Eventual Height Between Trees Between Rows Northstar Mahaleb 10 8 12 • Select varieties which are easiest to grow. Montmorency Gi.5 or 6 12 10 12 Montmorency Mahaleb 12 10 14 – Disease or insect resistant varieties to reduce pest Montmorency Mazzard 14 12 16 pressures. Balaton Mahaleb 14 12 16 – Cherry - Sweet – Assess soil / site conditions Tree Spacing • Full sun VS shade or partial Nursery ID • Soil internal drainage Rootstocks Eventual Height Between Trees Between Rows • Weed competition (lawns are too competitive) Gi.5 Dwarf 12 12 16 Gi.6 Dwarf 14 14 16 Mahaleb Semi Dwarf 20 14 16 Mazzard Semi Dwarf 24 16 20 Average Annual Minimum Temperatures Where to start? (USDA Plant Hardiness Zone Map) Most MI fruit sites Zone 5 (-20oF to -10oF) to 6 (-10oF to 0oF) • Fruit plants that fit into to small spaces – Peach, Nectarine, Apricot and Plums – Can generally plant at a spacing of 10 ft X 15 ft* • * If trained to open center or vase shape • Closer spacing, needs to be trained in Chistmas Tree form (Vertical Axe).
    [Show full text]
  • Ilex at the University of Delaware Botanic Gardens
    ILEX AT THE UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE BOTANIC GARDENS: A TEMPLATE FOR MEASURING COLLECTION RELEVANCE AT SMALL UNIVERSITY GARDENS by Jason M. Veil A thesis submitted to the Faculty of the University of Delaware in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Plant and Soil Sciences Summer 2015 © 2015 Jason M. Veil All Rights Reserved ProQuest Number: 1602355 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. ProQuest 1602355 Published by ProQuest LLC (2015). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, MI 48106 - 1346 ILEX AT THE UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE BOTANIC GARDENS: A TEMPLATE FOR MEASURING COLLECTION RELEVANCE AT SMALL UNIVERSITY GARDENS by Jason M. Veil Approved: _________________________________________________________ John J. Frett, Ph.D. Professor in charge of thesis on behalf of the Advisory Committee Approved: _________________________________________________________ Blake C. Meyers, Ph.D. Chair of the Department of Plant and Soil Sciences Approved: _________________________________________________________ Mark W. Rieger, Ph.D. Dean of the College of Agriculture and Natural Resources Approved: _________________________________________________________ James G. Richards, Ph.D. Vice Provost for Graduate and Professional Education ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Thank you to everyone who helped me get from there to here.
    [Show full text]
  • Fruit-Trees-Means-Nursery-2017.Pdf
    BOT_NAME COM_NAME TYPE FEATURES Developed by the University of Minnesota in 1991, a cross of Macoun and Honeygold. Crisp, juicy, sweet apple ranked as one of the highest quality apples. Over 3" Apple is richly coral-colored with a Malus Dwf Honey Crisp Apple Honey Crisp Apple Dwarf Tree/Fruit Apple yellow background. Stores Well. Pollenizer reccomended. Vigorous, compact, spreading tree. Large waxy fruits ripen in late fall. Crisp, juicy white flesh has a long-lasting sweet, snappy flavor. Excellent for cooking with a good shelf life. Self-fertile. Malus 'Granny Smith' S.D. Apple Semi-Dwf. Granny Smith Tree/Fruit Apple Deciduous. Developed in 1953 in New York, a cross between the crisp Golden Delicious and the blush-crimson Jonathan. They form a large sweet fruit with a thin skin. Jonagold is triploid, with sterile pollen, and Malus Jonagold Apple SD Jonagold Apple Semi Dwf Apple Tree/Fruit Apple as such, requires a second type of apple for pollen and is incapable of pollenizing other cultivars Known simply as King, the large yellow-green apples with red stripes are excellent for eating fresh, for Malus 'King' S.D. Apple Semi-Dwf. King Tree/Fruit Apple cooking and for making cider. They also keep well. Developed by the University of Minnesota in 1991, a cross of Macoun and Honeygold. Crisp, juicy, sweet apple ranked as one of the highest quality apples. Over 3" Apple is richly coral-colored with a Malus SD Honey Crisp Apple Honey Crisp Apple Semi Dwarf Tree/Fruit Apple yellow background. Stores Well. Pollenizer reccomended. Deciduous fruiting tree produces small pink single flowers in spring which turn white.
    [Show full text]
  • Cross-Pollination Planting Plans1 Stephen H
    HS170 Cross-Pollination Planting Plans1 Stephen H. Futch and Larry K. Jackson2 Self-incompatibility is a problem with several of the citrus Pollenizer Planting Plans hybrid varieties. The problem is due to slow pollen tube Plan A (Table 1) and Plan B (Table 2) are usually satisfac- growth and/or resultant inadequate cross pollination. Fruit tory for trees with space on 4 sides and less satisfactory for set is often quite low and productivity is compromised. tight hedgerows. Plan C (Table 3) is suggested for hedge- One means of overcoming self-incompatibility is cross- rows but it requires more pollenizer trees. In the plans, P is pollination with a compatible pollen. This is the most the pollenizer, while M is the primary or main variety. common corrective measure used in Florida; however, this results in seedy fruit. The variety used as a pollen source is Two basic plans are used when trees are maintained as the pollenizer and the honeybee, which carries the pollen individuals, i.e., pruned on 4 sides. Plan A uses 20% between the 2 varieties, is the pollinator or vector. A good pollenizers and Plan B about 11%. This takes into account pollenizer for a self-incompatible variety should have the the habit of bees to work back and forth between about following characteristics: 2 rows. These plans may not work as well where trees are hedgerowed because bees tend to limit flights up and 1. Sexually cross-compatible down the hedgerows instead of crossing over 2 adjacent 2. Overlapping bloom period rows. The best solution to this problem is not known but Plan C should suffice, however, it results in the use of 33% 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Pollination and Fruit Setting
    MARCH, 1937 BULLETIN 379- UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION F. B. Mumford, Director Pollination and Fruit Setting A. E. MURNEEK A promise of a 1l00d crop if properly pollinated. COLUMBIA, MISSOURI T ABLE OF CONTENTS Page The Process of Pollination and Fertilization ___ ___ ____ __ ___ __ ___ _______ ___ ____ ____ __ 3 Fruitfulness and Sterility__ __ ___ ________ _________ ____ ___ ____ __ _____ ___ ____ _____ _____ ____ ______ ___ __ 5 Pollination and Fruit Setting of the Apple _____ ___ .__ _____ _______ ______ __________ ______ _ 6 Fruitfulness Among Apple Varieties __ _____ __ . ___ ___ __. __.___ _______ __________ __ ____ 6 Good Pollenizers ____ ____ ___ __ ______ ____ . _____ .___ __ __ ___ ______ ___ ___ ____ _____ ___ _________ __ ___ 7 The Blooming Period _____ ____ _______ __ __ _____ _. __ _. __. ____ _____ __ _____ ___ _________ _____ ___ __ 9 Interplanting of Varieties ______ ___ _______ _____ _____ ______ ___________ ______ ______ ___ ___ __ _ 10 Bees for Orchard Pollination __ ____ ______ ____ _____ _. ___ ____ _____________ _____ _________ ___________ 13 Effects of Weather ____ __ _____________ __________ . ____ ___ ____ __ ______ _____ _____ ___ ___ ______ ___ __ ____ ______ 18 Importance of Vigor in Fruit Setting_ __ ______ . ______ __ _______ ______ ___ _______ ___ ______ ___ ___ 19 Apple Drops __ __ ____ __ _______ . __ __. __ ____ __ __ __.. _._ . _____ ____ ____ ___ __ ___ _______ ___ ___ ___ ____ ______ ____ .
    [Show full text]
  • Effect of Different Crab Apples As Pollinizers on Fruit Quality of Apple Under Kashmir Conditions, India
    Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci (2017) 6(12): 2467-2472 International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences ISSN: 2319-7706 Volume 6 Number 12 (2017) pp. 2467-2472 Journal homepage: http://www.ijcmas.com Original Research Article https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2017.612.286 Effect of Different Crab Apples as Pollinizers on Fruit Quality of Apple under Kashmir Conditions, India Rehana Javid1*, G. H. Rather1, Tawseef Rehman Baba1, Jahangeer A. Baba2, Mohammed Tauseef Ali1 and Rahila Shameem1 1Division of Fruit Science, Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Kashmir, Shalimar, Srinagar 190025, India 2DARS, Budgam J&K, India *Corresponding author ABSTRACT The present study entitled “Pollination Compatibility among different Apple cultivars.” K e yw or ds was carried out under Kashmir conditions, in an apple orchard of Department Of Horticulture, Pattan, district Baramulla during 2014-2015. Four crab apple species (Malus Crabs, Pollen floribunda, Golden Hornet, Manchurian and Fenna) and Golden Delicious were used as compatibility, Pollination , pollinizers for five apple cultivars (viz., Red Chief, Red Delicious, Red Fuji, Gala Mast Pollinizers . and Summer Red) and their functional pollen ability was determined. The highest fruit weight was observed with the pollen of Malus floribunda (189.60g) followed by Golden Article Info Delicious (187.15g) . The highest fruit length was observed with the pollen of Malus floribunda (6.82 cm) followed by Manchurian (6.73cm) and the lowest with that of Golden Accepted: 19 October 2017 Delicious (6.29cm) irrespective of the varieties. Highest fruit diameter was observed with Available Online: the pollen of Golden Hornet (6.38cm) followed by Manchurian (6.36cm).
    [Show full text]
  • PDF Version of Issue 26:13 – June 22, 2018
    Volume 26, Issue 13 June 22, 2018 Vegetable Crops Downy Mildew Resistant Cucumbers – Gordon Johnson, Extension Vegetable & Fruit Sweet Corn Insect Management – David Specialist; [email protected] Owens, Extension Entomologist, With downy mildew being found in pickling [email protected] and Bill Cissel, Extension cucumbers on Delmarva, resistant varieties Agent – Integrated Pest Management; should be considered. [email protected] We now have several slicing and pickling Sweet corn trapping data is updated by Tuesday cucumbers with some degree of resistance to the and Friday mornings and can be accessed here: current aggressive cucumber downy mildew http://agdev.anr.udel.edu/trap/trap.php . I strain. According to Clemson University new expect earworm counts to start decreasing; you research has identified two strains of cucurbit can look at our historical trapping data downy mildew: A1 attacks cucumber and Trap BLT – CEW Pheromone Corn cantaloupes (the most aggressive strain), while Location (3 nights CEW Spray A2 attacks watermelon, pumpkins, and squashes. total (3 nights Schedule In gynoecious slicing cucumbers, Bristol, catch) total catch) SV3462CS and SV4719CS and associated Dover 1 8 4 day pollenizers have intermediate resistance to Harrington 0 4 4-5 day cucumber downy mildew. In gynoecious pickles, Milford 0 3 5 day Citadel, Peacemaker, and SVCN6404 with Rising Sun 0 22 4 day associated pollenizers have intermediate Wyoming 0 0 No spray resistance. Next generation downy mildew Bridgeville 0 12 4 day resistant varieties are being tested this year on Concord 0 3 5 day Delmarva. Georgetown 0 0 No spray These varieties are not immune to downy Greenwood 0 0 No spray mildew, but they show less disease under the Laurel 0 7 4 day same pressure and will out yield susceptible Seaford 0 0 No spray varieties.
    [Show full text]
  • Field & Pickling Cucumbers
    Best Management Practices for Pollination in Ontario Crops www.pollinator.ca/canpolin Field & Pickling Cucumbers Cucumis sativus Mating & Breeding System Most cucumber varieties have separate male and female flowers located on the same plant. Most varieties are self- compatible, but due to the physical separation of the male and female flowers, insects are required to move pollen. There are typically more male flowers than female flowers on a given plant, and the male flowers mature first on an individual plant. The male flower produces pollen, and both male and female flowers produce nectar. Male nectar has a higher sugar concentration than the female. Bees usually collect pollen in the morning and switch to nectar in the afternoon, visiting both types of flowers and transferring the large, sticky pollen grains in the process. Fertility of the plant, however, is greatest in the morning and declines as the day progresses. Flowers of both sexes are typically open for only a single day, after which male and insufficiently-pollinated female flowers will drop. Some male-sterile hybrid varieties have been developed which produce only female flowers. These varieties are intended to increase yield, but they require interplanting of male-fertile varieties to provide pollen. Ovaries vary in length and number of ovules, with more ovules translating to larger fruits. Larger, older vines tend to produce larger flowers. Maturing fertilized fruit will inhibit development of new female flowers, and therefore limit the number of fruits an individual vine can produce. Pollination, Quality & Yield This information applies only to field and pickling cucumber pollination, since varieties grown in Ontario for fresh consump- tion are parthenocarpic (i.e., they develop without fertilization of the ovules).
    [Show full text]
  • Cucurbit Crop Growth and Development Liz Maynard Dept
    2007 Indiana CCA Conference Proceedings Cucurbit Crop Growth and Development Liz Maynard Dept. of Horticulture and Landscape Architecture Purdue University Indiana produces more than 15,000 acres of cucurbits including watermelons, muskmelons (cantaloupes), pumpkins, cucumbers, and squash (Table 1). The state ranks among the top ten for production of watermelon, muskmelon, pickling cucumbers, and pumpkins (Table 1). These crops are members of the Cucurbitaceae, or squash family. Genera most commonly grown include Cucurbita (squash and pumpkin); Cucumis (muskmelon and cucumber), and Citrullus (watermelon). Table 2 lists common species. This paper describes growth and reproductive development of these crops. Germination and Emergence Cucurbit seeds consist of an embryo and two cotyledons covered with a seed coat. Energy reserves are stored in the thick cotyledons. The processes of germination are typical of dicots with epigeal germination. Imbibition is followed by biochemical activity, and elongation and emergence of the radicle. The hypocotyl emerges from the seed coat and lengthens to push the hypocotyl hook above the soil surface. Exposed to light, the hook straightens, pulling the cotyledons out of the soil where they expand and begin photosynthesis. The seed coat may remain in the soil, or may adhere to one or both of the cotyledons, sometimes preventing their normal expansion. The length of time required for germination in a moist environment depends on the temperature. Between 59°F and 77°F, cucumbers and muskmelons require 194 degree days above a base temperature of 54°F (Taylor, 1997). Table 3 shows the time to emergence for several cucurbit crops at different soil temperatures. Summer squash may germinate at temperatures as low as 40-50°F, and cucumber at 53°F, but muskmelon and watermelon require at least 60°F (Wien, 1997).
    [Show full text]
  • Pollination of Citrus Hybrids1 Stephen H
    HS182 Pollination of Citrus Hybrids1 Stephen H. Futch and Larry K. Jackson2 Many of the popular citrus hybrid cultivars developed bloom each year to ensure consistent fruit crops. This is a and released during the last few decades have problems of very significant factor in plantings where the grower has sexual self-incompatibility which may result in low yields. planted the minimum possible number of pollenizers. In the normal flowering process, pollen is deposited from Growers must remember that insects are required to move the stamens onto the stigma of an open flower. This is the pollen since it is sticky, heavy, and the wind is not usually done by visiting insects, most often bees, in search effective. Honeybees are the best pollinators available. One of nectar. Since the stamens are adjacent to the stigma, colony of bees per two acres, properly placed in the grove is self-pollination is what most often occurs naturally. Even recommended. The grower must avoid use of insecticides when pollen comes from nearby trees in solid blocks, that are hazardous to bees during the bloom period (while self-pollination occurs since the varieties are the same. bees are in the grove). With self-incompatible varieties, self-pollination does not The bloom periods of the pollenizer tree and the trees to work because the pollen tube grows down the style into the be pollinated must overlap as much as possible. It may ovary (fruit) too slowly and sexual fertilization does not be desirable to have both types on the same rootstock, if actually occur. In many of the citrus hybrids, sexual fertil- possible.
    [Show full text]
  • Gears: Insect Pollination of Cultivated Crop Plants Insect Pollination of Cultivated Crop Plants by S.E
    gears: Insect Pollination Of Cultivated Crop Plants Insect Pollination Of Cultivated Crop Plants by S.E. McGregor, USDA Originally published 1976 The First and Only Virtual Beekeeping Book Updated Continously. Additions listed by crop and date. Introduction: Economics of Plant Pollination Flowering and Fruiting of Plants Hybrid Vigor in Plants and its Relationship to Insect Pollination Wild Bees and Wild Bee Culture Wild Flowers and Crop Pollination Pesticides in Relation to Beekeeping and Crop Pollination Pollination Agreements and Services Alphabetical Listing of Crops Dependent upon or Benefited by Insect Pollination Acerola Chapter 1: Alfafa Chapter 2: Almonds Chapter 3: Clover & CHAPTER CONTENTS Relatives ● Alsike Clover ● Persian Clover ● Arrowleaf Clover ● Red Clover ● Ball Clover ● Rose Clover ● Berseem Clover ● Strawberry Clover ● Black Medic/Yellow Trefoil ● Subterranean ● Cider Milkvetch Clover ● Clovers, General ● Sweet Clover ● Crimson Clover ● Sweet Vetch ● Crownvetch ● Trefoil ● Lespedeza ● Vetch ● Peanut ● White Clover ● Zigzag Clover file:///E|/Jason/book/index.html (1 of 4) [1/21/2009 3:45:07 PM] gears: Insect Pollination Of Cultivated Crop Plants Chapter 4: Legumes Chapter Contents & Relatives ● Beans ● Lubines ● Broad Beans and Field Beans ● Mung Bean, Green or Golden ● Cowpea Gram ● Kidneyvetch ● Pigeonpea ● Kudzu ● Sainfoin ● Lima Beans ● Scarlet Runner Bean ● Soybean Chapter 5: Tree Chapter Contents Fruits & Nuts & Exotic Fruits & ● Apple ● Macadamia Nuts ● Apricot ● Mango ● Avocado ● Mangosteen ● Cacao ● Neem ●
    [Show full text]
  • A Probabilistic Model of Flower Fertility and Factors Influencing Seed Production in Winter Oilseed Rape (Brassica Napus L.) Xiujuan Wang
    A Probabilistic Model of Flower Fertility and Factors Influencing Seed Production in Winter Oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.) Xiujuan Wang To cite this version: Xiujuan Wang. A Probabilistic Model of Flower Fertility and Factors Influencing Seed Production in Winter Oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.). Other. Ecole Centrale Paris; CHINA AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY, 2011. English. NNT : 2011ECAP0025. tel-00635536 HAL Id: tel-00635536 https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-00635536 Submitted on 25 Oct 2011 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. ECOLE´ CENTRALE DES ARTS ET MANUFACTURES ≪ECOLE´ CENTRALE PARIS ≫ COLLEGE OF RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES CHINA AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY Dissertation presented by: Xiujuan WANG for the degree of Doctor of Applied Mathematics Specialty: Applied Mathematics, Plant Biology Laboratory: Math´ematiques Appliqu´ees aux Syst`emes (MAS) Laboratory: Key Laboratory of Plant-Soil Interactions, College of Re- sources and Environmental Sciences A Probabilistic Model of Flower Fertility and Factors Influencing Seed Production in Winter Oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.) Date of defence : 08/06/2011 Jury: M. Baogui ZHANG China Agriculture University (Dissertation supervisor) M. Philippe de REFFYE CIRAD-INRIA (Dissertation supervisor) M. Baogang HU Chinese Academy of Sciences (Reviewer) M.
    [Show full text]