DOCSLIB.ORG

2010-2035 Long Range Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2010-2035 Long Range Plan The 2010-2035 Oklahoma Long Range Transportation Plan was approved by the Oklahoma Transportation Commission on December 6, 2010. This plan document is available at: Oklahoma Department of Transportation Planning and Research Division 200 NE 21st Street Oklahoma City, OK 73105 and on the Department’s website at: http://www.okladot.state.ok.us/p-r-div/planning.htm 2010–2035 Oklahoma Long Range Transportation Plan Prepared for: Oklahoma Department of Transportation Prepared by: Parsons Brinckerhoff December 2010 2010–2035 Oklahoma Long Range Transportation Plan Table of Contents Chapter 1 Introduction ..................................................................................................... 1-1 Background ........................................................................................................................... 1-1 Coordination with Metropolitan Planning Organizations .................................................... 1-1 Coordination with the State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) ........................ 1-2 Coordination with the 8-Year Construction Work Plan ........................................................ 1-3 Public Involvement Activities ................................................................................................ 1-3 Organization of this Plan Document ..................................................................................... 1-3 Continuing Efforts ................................................................................................................. 1-4 Chapter 2 Public Involvement Activities and Results ......................................................... 2-1 Approach ............................................................................................................................... 2-1 Overview of Public Involvement ........................................................................................... 2-1 Results ........................................................................................................................... 2-1 Stakeholder Coordination ..................................................................................................... 2-3 Initial Objective .............................................................................................................. 2-3 Results ........................................................................................................................... 2-3 Emerging Plan Goals ...................................................................................................... 2-6 Focus on Traditionally Underserved Populations ................................................................. 2-8 Initial Objectives ............................................................................................................ 2-8 Results ........................................................................................................................... 2-8 Awareness Building Activities ............................................................................................... 2-8 Initial Objectives ............................................................................................................ 2-8 Results ........................................................................................................................... 2-8 Community Outreach ......................................................................................................... 2-10 Initial Objectives .......................................................................................................... 2-10 Results ......................................................................................................................... 2-10 Education and Feedback ..................................................................................................... 2-11 Initial Objectives .......................................................................................................... 2-11 Results ......................................................................................................................... 2-11 Conclusion ........................................................................................................................... 2-13 Chapter 3 Policy Context .................................................................................................. 3-1 Purpose ................................................................................................................................. 3-1 Federal Policies Affecting Transportation ............................................................................ 3-1 Reauthorization of SAFETEA-LU .................................................................................... 3-2 Economic Stimulus Package .......................................................................................... 3-4 Environmental and Climate Change Legislation ............................................................ 3-4 National Environmental Policy Act Provisions ...................................................................... 3-6 Funding and Finance ............................................................................................................. 3-7 Current Situation with Federal Funding ........................................................................ 3-7 Federal Policy and Revenue Commissions .................................................................... 3-8 Potential Funding Strategies ......................................................................................... 3-9 Impact of an Evolving Policy Context on ODOT .................................................................. 3-11 i Table of Contents December 2010 Chapter 4 Oklahoma Demographic, Socio-economic, Land Use, and Travel Characteristics .................................................................................................. 4-1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 4-1 Population ............................................................................................................................. 4-1 Population Growth ........................................................................................................ 4-1 Birth Rates, Life Expectancy, and Migration ................................................................. 4-3 Race and Ethnicity ......................................................................................................... 4-5 Age Distribution ............................................................................................................. 4-5 Education ....................................................................................................................... 4-7 Employment .......................................................................................................................... 4-8 Income and Poverty Status ............................................................................................ 4-8 Land Use Trends ................................................................................................................. 4-10 Urban Areas ................................................................................................................. 4-10 Rural Areas................................................................................................................... 4-14 Recent Growth Trends and Projected Growth Areas .................................................. 4-14 Accident Characteristics .............................................................................................. 4-17 State Commuting Trends ............................................................................................. 4-17 Oklahoma Vehicle Fleet Characteristics ...................................................................... 4-18 Chapter 5 Oklahoma Economic Conditions and Freight Transportation ............................ 5-1 Background Economic Information ...................................................................................... 5-1 Overview of Oklahoma Economy .................................................................................. 5-1 Employment .................................................................................................................. 5-1 Major Industries ............................................................................................................ 5-1 Economic Forecast, 2008 to 2035 ........................................................................................ 5-4 Overview ........................................................................................................................ 5-4 Freight Flows ......................................................................................................................... 5-5 Current and Future Freight Volume .............................................................................. 5-5 Major Destination Regions for Oklahoma Exports ........................................................ 5-7 Modes of Transportation for Oklahoma Exports .......................................................... 5-7 Opportunities for Development ......................................................................................... 5-10 Agricultural Commodity Processing ...........................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Proposed Project – I-35 Improvements
    I‐35 ROADWAY Proposed Project – I‐35 Improvements Existing Facility The majority of existing I‐35 between the Williamson/Bell County Line and Hillsboro is four lanes, with six‐lane sections in Waco, Temple, and the southern part of Bell County. Project Purpose The purpose of the proposed project is to increase capacity and improve mobility on I‐35. Project Proposed by Corridor Segment 2 Committee The I‐35 Corridor Segment 2 Committee is considering improvements to I‐35, which would involve widening I‐35 to eight lanes from Hillsboro to the Williamso n/Bell County Line for a distance of approximately 93 miles. Conceptual Project Cost Estimate According to the TxDOT Waco District Improvement Plan, the cost for expanding I‐35 to six lanes through this area is estimated at approximately $1.5 billion. The six‐lane expansion of I‐35 is currently underway. The estimated cost for expanding I‐35 from six to eight lanes is between $2.25 billion and $3.25 billion, including design and construction. This cost, in 2010 dollars, does not include the purchase of right of way. The estimated project costs could increase due to right of way purchases and potential impacts to properties. I‐35 Corridor Segment 2 Committee www.MY35.org September 2010 I‐35 ROADWAY Proposed Project – I‐35E from I‐20 to Hillsboro Existing Facility The existing I‐35E facility is four lanes from Hillsboro to approximately ten miles south of I‐20, where it transitions to six and then eight lanes. Project Purpose The purpose of the proposed project is to increase capacity and improve overall mobility on I‐35E.
    [Show full text]
  • Greater OKLAHOMA CITY at a Glance
    Greater OKLAHOMA CITY at a glance 123 Park Avenue | Oklahoma City, OK 73102 | 405.297.8900 | www.greateroklahomacity.com TABLE OF CONTENTS Location ................................................4 Economy .............................................14 Tax Rates .............................................24 Climate ..................................................7 Education ...........................................17 Utilities ................................................25 Population............................................8 Income ................................................21 Incentives ...........................................26 Transportation ..................................10 Labor Analysis ...................................22 Available Services ............................30 Housing ...............................................13 Commercial Real Estate .................23 Ranked No. 1 for Best Large Cities to Start a Business. -WalletHub 2 GREATER OKLAHOMA CITY: One of the fastest-growing cities is integral to our success. Our in America and among the top ten low costs, diverse economy and places for fastest median wage business-friendly environment growth, job creation and to start a have kept the economic doldrums business. A top two small business at bay, and provided value, ranking. One of the most popular stability and profitability to our places for millennials and one of companies – and now we’re the top 10 cities for young adults. poised to do even more. The list of reasons you should Let us introduce
    [Show full text]
  • October 2009 Issue
    Pawnee Nation of Oklahoma Chaticks si Chaticks PRSRT STD P.O. Box 470 U.S. POSTAGE Pawnee, OK 74058 PAID PERMIT NO. 43 RETURN SERVICE REQUESTED PAWNEE, OK 74058 Page 2 Chaticks si Chaticks -October 2009- Message from the President Dear Pawnee Tribal Members: Take a look at the building going up at the Pawnee Nation Travel Plaza! Many have told me that as they drive by and see the structure developing, they feel proud. At long last the Pawnee Nation is stepping into the competitive arena of the casino and gaming business. Like it or not, the casino business for many American Indian tribes across the country has provided an economic advantage. We have lost three (3) years, plus $300,000,000 in the debacle of a few years. We had to work hard to prove our mettle to now skeptical lending agencies that we are an internally and structurally sound tribal organization of note. We are Pawnee and can make this business and its resulting products work to our advantage. We recognize the efforts of every member of the Tribal Development Cooperation (TDC) on this project. Each person on TDC had a hand in making this project a reality. This effort is a result of dogged TDC teamwork. My only regret at this point is that Les Hand, late Pawnee Business Council Treasurer, is not here to see the fruit of his work while on TDC. He is not here, but he sees it. The structure being built is 10,000 square feet and will accommodate 200 gaming machines and a 70 seating capacity steak house.
    [Show full text]
  • Oklahoma Statutes Title 69. Roads, Bridges, and Ferries
    OKLAHOMA STATUTES TITLE 69. ROADS, BRIDGES, AND FERRIES §69-101. Declaration of legislative intent.............................................................................................19 §69-113a. Successful bidders - Return of executed contract................................................................20 §69-201. Definitions of words and phrases..........................................................................................21 §69-202. Abandonment........................................................................................................................21 §69-203. Acquisition or taking..............................................................................................................21 §69-204. Arterial highway.....................................................................................................................21 §69-205. Authority................................................................................................................................21 §69-206. Auxiliary service highway.......................................................................................................21 §69-207. Board......................................................................................................................................21 §69-208. Bureau of Public Roads..........................................................................................................21 §69-209. Commission............................................................................................................................21
    [Show full text]
  • Interview with Robert Mandeville # IST-A-L-2013-103 Interview # 1: December 6, 2013 Interviewer: Mike Czaplicki
    Interview with Robert Mandeville # IST-A-L-2013-103 Interview # 1: December 6, 2013 Interviewer: Mike Czaplicki COPYRIGHT The following material can be used for educational and other non-commercial purposes without the written permission of the Abraham Lincoln Presidential Library. “Fair use” criteria of Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976 must be followed. These materials are not to be deposited in other repositories, nor used for resale or commercial purposes without the authorization from the Audio-Visual Curator at the Abraham Lincoln Presidential Library, 112 N. 6th Street, Springfield, Illinois 62701. Telephone (217) 785-7955 Czaplicki: Today is Friday, December 6, 2013. My name is Mike Czaplicki. I'm the project historian for the Governor Thompson Oral History Project here at the Abraham Lincoln Presidential Library. I'm with Dr. Robert Mandeville, who was Governor Thompson's budget director for most of his tenure. He's been gracious enough to come in on a very cold day and sit down and chat with us. Thank you, Bob. Mandeville: You're welcome. Czaplicki: We always like to start at the beginning with these things and ask, when and where were you born? Mandeville: Nineteen thirty-one, April 29, in Jacksonville, Illinois. Czaplicki: What is this document we're looking at here? Is this a scrapbook of yours? An autobiography?1 Mandeville: Yes, written about three years ago. Czaplicki: Unpublished? Mandeville: Unpublished, yes. I wrote it for my kids and my grandkids. Czaplicki: Oh, excellent. I'd like to take a look at that at some point in some more detail.
    [Show full text]
  • State of Oklahoma
    STATE OF OKLAHOMA 2nd Session of the 48th Legislature (2002) SENATE BILL 1623 By: Shurden AS INTRODUCED An Act relating to roads, bridges and ferries; amending 69 O.S. 2001, Section 1705, which relates to powers and duties of the Transportation Authority; modifying powers and duties of the Authority; designating a portion of State Highway 9 east of Eufaula to Stigler, Oklahoma, as the “Harold Pinney Memorial Highway” for his honorary service in World War II, and the Korean and Vietnam Wars; The Department of Transportation shall cause suitable permanent markers to be placed upon the highway bearing his name; providing for codification; and declaring an emergency. BE IT ENACTED BY THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA: SECTION 1. AMENDATORY 69 O.S. 2001, Section 1705, is amended to read as follows: Section 1705. The Oklahoma Transportation Authority is hereby authorized and empowered: (a) To adopt bylaws for the regulation of its affairs and conduct of its business. (b) To adopt an official seal and alter the same at pleasure. (c) To maintain an office at such place or places within the state as it may designate. (d) To sue and be sued in contract, reverse condemnation, equity, mandamus and similar actions in its own name, plead and be impleaded; provided, that any and all actions at law or in equity against the Authority shall be brought in the county in which the principal office of the Authority shall be located, or in the county of the residence of the plaintiff, or the county where the cause of action arose.
    [Show full text]
  • INFRA GRANT APPLICATION I-35 Texoma Segment
    INFRA GRANT APPLICATION I-35 Texoma Segment February 2020 Texas Department of Transportation Oklahoma Department of Transportation Chickasaw Nation Project Name I-35 Texoma Segment Project Sponsor Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) Oklahoma Department of Transportaiton (ODOT) Chickasaw Nation Primary Point of Contact TxDOT Was an INFRA applcation for this project previously submitted? No Project Costs • INFRA Request Amount $150,000,000 • Estimated Federal funding (excluding INFRA) anticipated to be used in $47,524,000 INFRA funded future project • Estimated non-Federal funding anticipated to be used in INFRA funded $68,157,500 future project • Future Eligble Project Costs $265,681,500 • Previously incurred project costs (engineering, land acquisition) $ 21,335,500 • Total Project Cost $287,017,000 Are matching funds restricted to a specific project component? Yes. Each State will pay 50% of Red River Bridge and the percentage of the project within their states. The Chickasaw Nation is committed to right-of-way and utilities costs on their property Approximately how much of the estimated future eligible project costs 100% - $265,681,500 will be spent on components of the project currently located in the National Highway Freight Network? Approximately how much of the estimated future eligible project costs 100% - $265,681,500 will be spent on components of the project currently located on the National Highway System (NHS)? Approximately how much of the estimated future eligible project costs $1,823,250 will be spent on components constituting railway-highway grade crossing or grade separation projects? Approximately how much of the estimated future eligible project costs N/A will be spent on components constituting intermodal or freight rail projects, or freight projects withint the boundaries of a public or private freight rail, water, or intermodal facility.
    [Show full text]
  • Segment Four Final.Pdf
    AtAscosA BexAr Frio GuAdAlupe lA sAlle MedinA WeBB Wilson ZApAtA i-35 CORRIDOR cotullA lAredo peArsAll sAn Antonio seGuin st HedWiG seGMENT 4 recoMMENDATIONS sAn Antonio/ BexAr county Mpo Laredo urban trAnsportAtion study GreAter sAn Antonio cHAMBer oF coMMerce seGuin cHAMBer oF coMMerce soutH sAn INTERSTATE Antonio cHAMBer oF 35 coMMerce texAs FArM BureAu INTRODUCTION In 2007, the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) recognized the need for the regular and systematic input of citizen planners to help determine the future of the I-35 corridor. In response, the I-35 Corridor Advisory Committee was created by the Texas Transportation Commission, bringing together a group of independent Texas citizens interested in the future of the corridor. These indi- viduals, representing their regions, provide TxDOT with a citizen’s view of how the corridor should be developed. After a period of intense collaboration, the I-35 Corridor Advisory Commit- tee issued the Citizens’ Report on the Current and Future Needs of the I-35 Corridor in November 2008. Their report concluded that the existing capacity on I-35 was insufficient to meet future mobility demands, that additional capacity would be needed within the corridor, and that more community involvement was needed in planning the I-35 corridor. The Texas Transportation Commission agreed it was time for even more public input into the planning process, and called for a citizen- directed effort starting at the local level. OKLAHOMA In March 2009, the Texas Transportation Commission es- tablished four I-35 Corridor Segment Committees to assist 1 ¨¦§30 Ft Worth Dallas the Corridor Advisory Committee.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of State Speed Laws
    DOT HS 810 826 August 2007 Summary of State Speed Laws Tenth Edition Current as of January 1, 2007 This document is available to the public from the National Technical Information Service, Springfield, Virginia 22161 This publication is distributed by the U.S. Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, in the interest of information exchange. The opinions, findings, and conclusions expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the Department of Transportation or the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. The United States Government assumes no liability for its contents or use thereof. If trade or manufacturers' names or products are mentioned, it is because they are considered essential to the object of the publication and should not be construed as an endorsement. The United States Government does not endorse products or manufacturers. TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ...................................................iii Missouri ......................................................138 Alabama..........................................................1 Montana ......................................................143 Alaska.............................................................5 Nebraska .....................................................150 Arizona ...........................................................9 Nevada ........................................................157 Arkansas .......................................................15 New
    [Show full text]
  • Real Property Inventory of the State of Oklahoma
    MORRISON RAMP W BOUND EXIT CIMARRON TP CIMARRON TURNPIKE- (BUILDING/ROOM# TURNPIKE AUTHORITY OWNED TOLL BOOTH SH 64WB EXIT CANOPY 978-09968) MORRISON NOBLE 1990 TOLL EXIT GATE S16 T21N R3E 100% 1990 100% 100% DAILY COWETA (SATELLITE)N BOUND EXT MUSK MUSKOGEE TURNPIKE- TP HWY 51 COWETA NB (BUILDING/ROOM# TURNPIKE AUTHORITY OWNED TOLL BOOTH ENT BOOTH 978-09986) COWETA WAGONER 1995 TOLL EXIT GATE S15 T17N R16E 72 SF $75,000.00 100% 1995 100% DAILY 9011 JOHN KILPATRICK KILPATRICK TURNPIKE- (BUILDING/ROOM# TURNPIKE AUTHORITY OWNED UTILITY BUILDING JKT N TOLL UTIL BLDG 978-12842) YUKON CANADIAN 2000 TOLL UTILITY BUILDING S36 T13N R5W 1,400 SF $352,877.00 100% 2000 100% DAILY MUSKOGEE TURNPIKE MI MARKER 12.73 MUSKOGEE TURNPIKE- (BUILDING/ROOM# TURNPIKE AUTHORITY OWNED BARN COWETA SALT HOUSE 978-11159) COWETA WAGONER 1996 SALT BARN S15 T17N R16E 2,400 SF $100,800.00 100% 1996 100% DAILY ANTLERS MAINT YD @ MI 16 - INDIAN INDIAN NATION NATN TURNPIKE- ANTLERS (BUILDING/ROOM# TURNPIKE AUTHORITY OWNED BARN SALT STORAGE BLDG 978-10342) ANTLERS PUSHMATAHA 1995 SALT BARN S5 T4S R16E 2,432 SF $102,144.00 100% 1995 100% DAILY MI 7 ON THE CHICKASAW CHICKASAW TURNPIKE- TURNPIKE MAINTENANCE BLDG #4 MECHANIC'S (BUILDING/ROOM# TURNPIKE AUTHORITY OWNED BUILDING SHOP 978-10326) SUPLPHUR MURRAY 1995 SHOP S7 T1N R4E 1,800 SF $61,200.00 100% 1995 100% DAILY BDWY EXT, KILPATRICK TURNPIKE- KILPATRICK TNPK BDWY EXT WB EXIT (BUILDING/ROOM# OKLAHOMA TURNPIKE AUTHORITY OWNED TOLL BOOTH BOOTH GEN 978-09219) CITY OKLAHOMA 1991 TOLL BOOTH & GEN S15 T13N R3W 56 SF 100% 1991 100% DAILY COWEETA (SATELLITE)S BOUND EXT MUSK MUSKOGEE TURNPIKE- TP HWY 5 COWETA SB EXT (BUILDING/ROOM# TURNPIKE AUTHORITY OWNED TOLL BOOTH BOOTH 978-09987) COWETA WAGONER 1995 TOLL EXIT GATE S15 T17N R16E 72 SF $75,000.00 100% 1995 100% DAILY LEACH EXIT ON CHEROKEE TP CHEROKEE TURNPIKE- (BUILDING/ROOM# TURNPIKE AUTHORITY OWNED RETAIL BUILDING BURGER KING/EZ GO 978-10016) LEACH DELAWARE SERVICE PLAZA S15 T20N R22E 100% 100% 100% DAILY ELGIN RAMP NORTH BAILEY TURNPIKE- H.E.
    [Show full text]
  • N Cherokee Turnpike
    N 10 5,473 Locust 82 3,446 3,373 Grove West 3,428 Siloam 3,507 Leach Kansas Springs 3,517 5,381 3,620 Cherokee Turnpike Average Daily Traffic For the year ending December 31, 2015 Length of Turnpike: 32.8 miles N TOTAL 1,477 To TOTAL I-35 To 1,477 Ada 7 1 1,460 1,460 1 Roff Sulphur Chickasaw Turnpike Average Daily Traffic For the year ending December 31, 2015 Length of Turnpike: 17.3 miles N 2,795 2,980 To Enid 2,781 Morrison 1,938 2,985 3,166 4,883 Hallet 4,955 3,176 To 18 4,918 99 4,973 48 Tulsa Hallet Stillwater 1,959 Cimarron Turnpike Average Daily Traffic For the Year ending December 31, 2015 5,475 5,166 5,545 5,313 5,650 5,342 5,821 <-------westbound 5,339 7,874 9,917 9,854 23,966 26,521 27,194 6,076 18,047 7,347 10,987 13,315 5,508 6,781 7,024 W. Ave W. 7,754 6,282 12,331 10,635 7,239 S. 65th S. 8,090 10,180 10,029 11,222 18,105 23,769 27,459 27,992 7,039 -----eastbound---------> 12,490 11,748 10,111 7,633 Creek Turnpike For the year ending December 31, 2015 N Lawton/Fort Sill 49 9,341 Cyril Chickasha To Oklahoma 3,400 5628 36 City 10,418 37 Elgin 9,522 3,191 7 County 9,195 Road 3,301 5,610 10,480 9,578 Walters 3,418 Newcastle To Randlett 3,165 Texas To 9 Norman State 3,415 Newcastle H.E.
    [Show full text]
  • O K L a H O M a Turnpike Authority
    O K L A H O M A Turnpike Authority 2020 Adopted Budget Authority Members; Kevin Stitt, Member Ex-Officio Tim Gatz, Secretary of Transportation/Executive Director Dana Weber, Chairwoman Gene Love, Vice Chairman John D. Jones, Secretary/Treasurer Guy Berry, Member John Titsworth, Member Todd Cone, Member Prepared by the Finance and Revenue Division of the Oklahoma Turnpike Authority. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Preparation of this document was coordinated by the staff of the Oklahoma Turnpike Authority and the staff of the Finance and Revenue Division. Management staff includes: Tim J. Gatz, Executive Director Alan Freeman, Assistant Executive Director, Finance & Administration Joe Echelle Assistant Executive Director, Maintenance, Engineering & Construction David Machamer, Assistant Executive Director, Toll and PIKEPASS Operations Paul Caesar Chief Information Security Officer Mark Kalka Director of Maintenance Mary Biswell Director of Toll Operations Darian Butler Director of Engineering Shawn Davis Director of Construction Marcus Williams Director of PIKEPASS Customer Service Wendy Smith Director of Finance and Revenue Julie Porter Controller Joni Seymour Director of Information Technology Cheryl O'Rourke Director of Administrative Services Major Todd Blish Oklahoma Highway Patrol Finance and Revenue staff : Wendy Smith, C.P.A. Patrice Collins Jordan Perdue Emily Sweet BUDGET MESSAGE & ORGANIZATIONAL INFORMATION Summary of Significant Budget Items Memo 1 Description of the Oklahoma Turnpike Authority 17 FINANCIAL BUDGET SUMMARY Division Organization Chart . .27 . Summary of Cash Investments Accounts Chart . .28 . Summary of Operating Results . 30. Financial Description of Entity . .32 . Revenue Projections . .41 . CAPITAL PLAN Five Year Capital Plan Summary . 45. Five Year Capital Plan Detail . 48. GENERAL FUND BUDGET General Fund Budget Summary .
    [Show full text]