DOCSLIB.ORG

Maritime & Coastguard Agency Annual Report and Accounts

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Maritime & Coastguard Agency Annual Report and Accounts 2018-19 Maritime & Coastguard Agency Annual Report and Accounts HC 2450 Maritime & Coastguard Agency Annual Report and Accounts 2018-2019 Presented to the House of Commons pursuant to Section 7 of the Government Resources and Accounts Act 2000 Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 18 July 2019 HC 2540 The Department for Transport and the Maritime & Coastguard Agency have actively considered the needs of the blind and partially sighted people in accessing this document. The text will be made available in full on the Department’s website. The text may be freely downloaded and translated by individuals or organisations for conversion into other accessible formats. If you have other needs in this regard, please contact the Agency: Maritime & Coastguard Agency 105 Commercial Road Southampton SO15 1EG Telephone 0203 817 2000 Website www.gov.uk/mca Email enquiries [email protected] © Crown copyright 2019 This publication is licensed under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0 except where otherwise stated. To view this licence, visit nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/version/3 Where we have identified any third-party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. This publication is available at www.gov.uk/official-documents Any enquiries regarding this publication should be sent to us at Maritime & Coastguard Agency, Spring Place, 105 Commercial Road, Southampton SO15 1EG ISBN 978-1-5286-1199-2 CCS0419958472 07/19 Printed on paper containing 75% recycled fibre content minimum Printed in the UK by the APS Group on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office PERFORMANCE REPORT ........................................................................ 1 NON-EXECUTIVE CHAIRMAN’S INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 2 CHIEF EXECUTIVE’S FOREWORD................................................................................................................................. 3 WHO WE ARE AND WHAT WE DO ............................................................................................................................... 5 OUR ACHIEVEMENTS IN 2018-19 .............................................................................................................................. 6 LOCATION OF CIVILIAN SEARCH AND RESCUE HELICOPTER TASKINGS, YEAR ENDING MARCH 2019 ......................................... 8 DELIVERING AGAINST OUR 2018-19 BUSINESS PLAN .................................................................................................. 11 FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS ........................................................................................................................ 19 SAFER LIVES – PREVENTING LOSS OF LIFE ................................................................................................................... 20 SAFER SHIPS – IMPROVING MARITIME SAFETY ............................................................................................................ 24 CLEANER SEAS – PROTECTING THE ENVIRONMENT ...................................................................................................... 29 OUR PEOPLE ......................................................................................................................................................... 30 EXTERNAL RELATIONS ............................................................................................................................................ 31 HEALTH AND SAFETY .............................................................................................................................................. 32 SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT .................................................................................................................................. 35 ACCOUNTABILITY REPORT ................................................................. 38 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE REPORT .......................................................................................................................... 39 GOVERNANCE STATEMENT ..................................................................................................................................... 42 REMUNERATION AND STAFF REPORT ........................................................................................................................ 52 PARLIAMENTARY ACCOUNTABILITY DISCLOSURES (AUDITED) ........................................................................................ 61 THE CERTIFICATE AND REPORT OF THE COMPTROLLER AND AUDITOR GENERAL TO THE HOUSE OF COMMONS ..................... 62 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS .................................................................... 65 STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE NET EXPENDITURE ................................................................................................... 66 STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION ........................................................................................................................ 67 STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS .................................................................................................................................. 68 STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN TAXPAYERS’ EQUITY ....................................................................................................... 69 NOTES TO THE AGENCY’S ACCOUNTS ........................................................................................................................ 70 Performance Report 1 Non-Executive Chairman’s introduction I’m pleased to present the Maritime and Coastguard Agency’s Annual Report and Accounts for 2018-19. In the autumn of 2018 Sir Alan Massey retired as Chief Executive after eight years in office. During that period there were major changes to HM Coastguard’s operation which have provided a strong base for future development. Brian Johnson joined the MCA as Chief Executive in November 2018 and brings a range of skills and experience from many different industries. I have every confidence Brian will enhance the performance of the Agency by setting a clear strategy for the future and enhancing our operational performance. The Survey and Inspection Transformation Programme is now well established, however the UK Ship Register has not had an easy year due to the uncertainty created by EU Exit which has resulted in a number of customers leaving the flag. Active discussions continue with shipping companies who are less sensitive to EU Exit. During the year a considerable amount of work has been carried out as the Agency looks to the future development of HM Coastguard. Experience over the last few years has shown that the skills and capability of the service has applications in many areas beyond maritime rescue which has benefit to the wider community. The performance of the Agency going forward will depend on the skills and capability of our staff and therefore a priority will be to support and develop our people. Finally, I would like to express my thanks to the Agency’s Senior Leadership team and their staff for their work and support over the last year. Michael Parker Non-Executive Chairman 2 Chief Executive’s foreword I’m pleased to present my first Annual Report and Accounts for the Maritime & Coastguard Agency as its Chief Executive. I took over from Sir Alan Massey on 1 November 2018 and I pay tribute to his eight-year leadership of the Maritime & Coastguard Agency. Our vision is to be the world’s best maritime safety organisation and this Report captures our work to demonstrate that ambition. In the past year, I’m delighted to report on the strides we’ve made towards achieving this goal. To support that work, I used the opportunity of my arrival as Chief Executive to re-shape the Agency’s top team and structures. The Survey and Inspection Transformation Programme has enabled us to be much more responsive to the needs of our shipping customers. We successfully recruited 33 new marine surveyors in this reporting period which will enable us to hit our survey and inspection targets. Customer satisfaction with our services have been very high. The completion of our estates rationalisation saw the opening of our new facility in Colchester, replacing our former sites in Norwich, Orpington and Walton-On-The-Naze. The United Kingdom’s Ship Register had a difficult year as we prepare for the UK’s withdrawal from the European Union. The uncertainty around EU Exit has led to some customers removing ships from the Register and caused the size of the UK Ship Register to fall by 5.6m Gross Tonnage to 10.8m in March 2019. We have taken the opportunity to re-think the Register’s service offer to customers. Ministers have extended the eligibility criteria to enable us to attract shipping in new markets. The UK Ship Register has a very attractive proposition that is committed to quality and service, which is reflected in our position of 5th on the Paris Memorandum of Understanding on Port State Control “White List”. The MCA is readier than ever to respond to emergencies at sea, on the coast and inland. In the last year, our coastguard search and rescue service answered the call swiftly and effectively to over 24,000 incidents, sometimes in the most difficult of conditions. Our 3,500 volunteers in the community-based Coastguard Rescue Service and our salaried Coastguard personnel have continued to improve their capability to tackle new challenges, which increasingly included training
Load more

Recommended publications
  • How Best to Respond? Expert Meeting Djibuti, 8-10 November 2011
    RefugeesRefugees andand asylumasylum--seekersseekers inin distressdistress atat seasea –– howhow bestbest toto respondrespond?? ExpertExpert meetingmeeting DjibutiDjibuti,, 88--1010 NovemberNovember 20112011 AUTHORITIES INVOLVED IN RESCUE AT SEA Central Directorate Strategic Coordination Navy Navy CoCoastast Guard Operational guidance in high seas Operational guidance for S.A.R. events Guardia di Finanza Police & Carabinieri Operational guidance in territorial waters Close shore line patrolling PrincipalPrincipal FlowsFlows towardstowards ItalyItaly From TUNISIA EGADI ISLANDS TUNISI TUNISIA LINOSA LAMPEDUSA SOUSSE MADIJA * Up to 5 November DATA ON LANDINGS YEARS LANDINGS MEN WOMEN MINOR TOTAL 2009 39 391 1 7 399 2010 51 560 2 52 614 2011* 512 26.682 235 1.102 28.019** **Landing in Lampedusa 25.714 Landing in Linosa 429 In 2011 have been arrested 73 smugglers and facilitators and 337 boats have been confiscated. In the 2010, were arrested only 7 persons and 19 boats were confiscated. Modus Operandi from Tunisia • By zodiac or wooden boat, of about 4 to 15 meters in length with 3 to 279 persons aboard (on a boat of 12 meters in length) • By fishing boats of 15/25 meters in length (maximum 344 persons aboard a boat of 15 meters in length) • Principally young males • Many trips are self-organized • Nocturnal departure • The cost is about 1,500/2,000 dinars • The Tunisians, generally, claim to want to reach northern Europe From LIBYA SICILY LINOSA LAMPEDUSA TRIPOLI ZUARA MISRATAH LIBYA * Up to 26 may DATA ON LANDINGS YEARS LANDINGS MEN WOMEN MINOR TOTAL 2009 55 4,928 896 466 6,290 2010 9 279 10 57 346 2011* 99 23.137 3.016 1.985 28.318 In 2011 have been arrested 51 smugglers and facilitators and have been confiscated 60 boats.
    [Show full text]
  • Submission-Mare-Liberum
    1 Submission to the Special Rapporteur on the human rights of migrants: pushback practices and their impact on the human rights of migrants by Mare Liberum Mare Liberum is a Berlin based non-profit-association, that monitors the human rights situation in the Aegean Sea with its own ships - mainly of the coast of the Greek island of Lesvos. As independent observers, we conduct research to document and publish our findings about the current situation at the European border. Since March 2020, Mare Liberum has witnessed a dramatic increase in human rights violations in the Aegean, both at sea and on land. Collective expulsions, commonly known as ‘pushbacks’, which are defined under ECHR Protocol N. 4 (Article 4), have been the most common violation we have witnessed in 2020. From March 2020 until the end of December 2020 alone, we counted 321 pushbacks in the Aegean Sea, in which 9,798 people were pushed back. Pushbacks by the Hellenic Coast Guard and other European actors, as well as pullbacks by the Turkish Coast Guard are not a new phenomenon in the Aegean Sea. However, the numbers were significantly lower and it was standard procedure for the Hellenic Coast Guard to rescue boats in distress and bring them to land where they would register as asylum seekers. End of February 2020 the political situation changed dramatically when Erdogan decided to open the borders and to terminate the EU-Turkey deal of 2016 as a political move to create pressure on the EU. Instead of preventing refugees from crossing the Aegean – as it was agreed upon in the widely criticised EU-Turkey deal - reports suggested that people on the move were forced towards the land and sea borders by Turkish authorities to provoke a large number of crossings.
    [Show full text]
  • GAO-21-539, COVID-19: the Coast Guard Has Addressed Challenges
    United States Government Accountability Office Report to Congressional Addressees July 2021 COVID-19 The Coast Guard Has Addressed Challenges, but Could Improve Telework Documentation and Personnel Data GAO-21-539 July 2021 COVID-19 The Coast Guard Has Addressed Challenges, but Could Improve Telework Documentation and Highlights of GAO-21-539, a report to Personnel Data congressional addressees Why GAO Did This Study What GAO Found The Coast Guard is a multi-mission The U.S. Coast Guard took steps to safeguard its personnel during the COVID- maritime military service responsible 19 pandemic by updating its policies and guidance, expanding telework, and for maritime safety, security, and administering COVID-19 vaccines, among other efforts. For example, the Coast environmental protection, among other Guard formed a COVID-19 Crisis Action Team comprising targeted working things. During the pandemic, the Coast groups to address COVID-19-related issues and develop new policies and Guard has faced challenges in guidance. Further, from December 2020 through April 2021, the Coast Guard balancing the need to safeguard its administered vaccines to 35,439 (about 64 percent) of its personnel. personnel with its responsibility to continue missions and operations. Selected U.S. Coast Guard COVID-19 Crisis Action Team Working Groups In response to a CARES Act mandate and congressional requests, GAO reviewed the Coast Guard’s efforts to respond to the pandemic. This report examines (1) the Coast Guard’s actions to reduce the risk of COVID-19 exposure for its personnel; (2) challenges the Coast Guard faced in operating in a pandemic environment and how it addressed them; and (3) the extent to which the Coast Guard has The Coast Guard also took actions to address a variety of challenges posed by collected and maintained valid and the COVID-19 pandemic.
    [Show full text]
  • Authorization to Disclose Coast Guard Information Form
    AUTHORIZATION TO DISCLOSE COASTGUARD INFORMATION United States Coast Guard Headquarters Commandant (G-MRI) 2100 2nd Street., S.W. Washington, DC 20593-0001 Re: Name: Address: D.O.B.: S.S. No.: Please accept this authorization and provide the information below: I hereby authorize the United States Coast Guard (the “Covered Entity”) to release my information described below to: New Jersey Maritime Pilot and Docking Pilot Commission One Penn Plaza East 9th Floor Newark, New Jersey 07105 (973) 491-7693 Purpose of Disclosure: The documents are being produced in connection with an Application for New Jersey State Docking Pilot license. Documents/Information to be Released: This authorization is limited to obtain applicant’s Coast Guard license and records: Information to be disclosed and provided: ___ Any and all information obtained during any investigation of this applicant; ___ Evidence of current first class pilot’s license or a first class pilot endorsement license issued by the United States Coast Guard; ___ Evidence of current unlimited radar observer’s certificate; ___ Evidence of participation in a United States Department of Transportation required drug screening and testing program; ___ Evidence of a current physical examination by a licensed physician in a manner prescribed by the United States Coast Guard; New Jersey Maritime Pilot and Docking Pilot Commission One Penn Plaza East, 9th Floor Newark, NJ 07105 I understand that the information to be disclosed includes my identity, diagnosis and treatment including but not limited to, ALCOHOL, DRUGS, GENETIC TESTING, BEHAVIORAL OR MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES, REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS, SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED & INFECTIOUS DISEASES, AIDS AND HIV information, as applicable.
    [Show full text]
  • 137733NCJRS.Pdf
    If you have issues viewing or accessing this file contact us at NCJRS.gov. -.. ~ r---~~~--------' • Thru: 3/31/92 U.S. COAST GUARD \ " DIGEST OF LAW ENFORCEMENT ~. L STATISTICS Compiled by (G-OLE -1 ) I I!:'::l, , L~.~Jr CJ" If"\i. .§J~ ;J f I I. '-----_________----1 II I The U.S. Coast Guard's General Digest of Law Enforcement Statistics is published semi-annually. It is distributed primarily within the Coast Guard. It is, however, provided to interested agencies and individuals on request. • This booklet represents the most recent information available for the reported period. Some changes may occasionally be noted for prior year information as cases are reviewed and updated. The information presented herein is compiled, reviewed, and promulgated by the Operational Law Enforcement Division of U.S. Coast Guard Headquarters. To provide comments or ask questions please call (202) 267-1766 (FTS callers use same number without area code). To aid the reader in corresponding with this office, our mailing address is provided below: Commandant (G-OLE-1) USCG Headquarters Room 3110 2100 2nd Street, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20593-0001 • 137733 U.S. Department of Justice National Institute of Justice This document has been reproduced exactly as received from the person or organization originating it. Po in Is of view or opinions stated in this document are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of the National Institute of Justice. Permission to reproduce this nqa '1'%1 material has been granted by U.S. Coast GJard~ ___________ to the National Criminal Justice Reference Service (NCJRS).
    [Show full text]
  • Icelandic Coast Guard Icelandicicelandicicelandic Coastcoastcoast Guardguardguard
    Icelandic Coast Guard IcelandicIcelandicIcelandic CoastCoastCoast GuardGuardGuard CDRCDR GylfiGylfi GeirssonGeirsson Icelandic Coast Guard TheTheThe IcelandicIcelandicIcelandic IntegratedIntegratedIntegrated SystemSystemSystem •• OneOne JointJoint OperationOperation CentreCentre forfor –– CoastCoast GuardGuard OperationOperation •• MonitoringMonitoring ControlControl andand SurveillanceSurveillance (MCS)(MCS) –– GeneralGeneral PolicingPolicing inin thethe IcelandicIcelandic EEZEEZ –– VesselVessel MonitoringMonitoring SystemSystem (VMS)(VMS) –– FisheriesFisheries MonitoringMonitoring CentreCentre (FMC)(FMC) –– MaritimeMaritime TrafficTraffic ServiceService (MTS)(MTS) •• GlobalGlobal MaritimeMaritime DistressDistress andand SafetySafety SystemSystem •• SingleSingle PointPoint ofof ContactContact forfor allall MaritimeMaritime relatedrelated nonotificationstifications –– SchengenSchengen –– PortPort CallCall –– TransitTransit –– SearchSearch andand RescueRescue (SAR)(SAR) –– EmergencyEmergency responseresponse MCS – VMS – FMC – MTS – SAR All integrated into one single centre Icelandic Coast Guard TheTheThe AreaAreaArea ofofof OperationOperationOperation Icelandic Coast Guard TheThe IcelandicIcelandic EEZ.EEZ. AnAn areaarea ofof 754.000754.000 kmkm 22 TheThe NEAFCNEAFC RegulatoryRegulatory AreaArea onon thethe ReykjanesReykjanes ridgeridge CDR G. Geirsson Icelandic Coast Guard TheThe NEAFCNEAFC RegulatoryRegulatory AreaArea EastEast ofof IcelandIceland Icelandic Coast Guard TheThe Icelandic Icelandic SAR SAR area. area. 1,8 1,8 million million
    [Show full text]
  • HOL - Netherlands NOTES
    HOL - Netherlands NOTES DSC WATCH - Coast stations participating in MF, HF and VHF watch-keeping using digital selective calling techniques DC1 All radio stations are remotely controlled from the Coast Guard Centre in Den Helder (JRCC Den Helder). MED- ADVICE - Stations transmitting medical advice MD1 Medical advice may be obtained from the station Netherlands Coast Guard Radio (PBK) by ships of any nationality. After preliminary call on MF DSC 2187.5 kHz, a working frequency will be indicated to the ship. Medical advice may be obtained from the station Netherlands Coast Guard Radio (PBK) by ships of any nationality. After preliminary announcement on 156.8 MHz (C16), a working channel will be indicated where the ship will be connected to a doctor of the Medical Advice Service. Medical advice may be obtained from the station Netherlands Coast Guard Radio (PBK) by ships of any nationality via INMARSAT using SAC code 32 or 38 (INMARSAT-C or B telex). The ship will be prompted on the procedure or via INMARSAT voice where the ship will be connected to a doctor of the Medical Advice Service. MD2 Receiving frequencies 2045, 2048, 2051, 2054 and 2057 kHz. MD3 Receiving frequency 2520 kHz. RCC’s - Rescue coordination centers (MRCC, RCC, MRSC, JRCC) RC1 The Netherlands Coast Guard (JRCC Den Helder) co-ordinates search and rescue operations within the Netherlands Continental Shelf area and the inshore waters Waddenzee, IJsselmeer, and in Zeeland and Zuid-Holland estuaries. JRCC Den Helder keeps watch as follows: Identification Frequency / Channel Watch schedule C16 H24 002442000 C70 H24 2182 kHz After prior announcement on 2187.5 kHz 002442000 2187.5 kHz H24 H24 424426512 Inmarsat–C Answer back: CGHQ NL Y:\APP\BR\MMS\List4-2011\NOTES NOTES to the List of Coast Stations and Special Service Stations (List IV) - Updated: 1 August 2017 HOL - Netherlands – 1 of 3 During normal radiocommunications the Netherlands Coast Guard will use the call sign “this is Netherlands Coast Guard”.
    [Show full text]
  • NETHERLANDS COASTGUARD (JRCC Den Helder) NEWSLETTER Nr
    NETHERLANDS COASTGUARD (JRCC Den Helder) NEWSLETTER nr. 41E (July 2007) COASTGUARD VHF AND MF/HF TRANSMIT AND RECEIVE LOCATIONS. WEST-TERSCHELLING 53.21'.26"N 005.12'.50"E SCHIERMONNIKOOG 53.28'.32"N 006.09'.19"E Receiving Station MF/HF 2187,5 kHz MF DSC VHF Tx/Rx 2182 kHz Emergency Frequency Aerial direction 345 + Other Coast Guard MF Frequencies Channel 16 and 70 DSC VHF Tx/Rx + Channel 23 for: Navigational warnings, Aerial direction 345 Weather forecasts and Radio Medical Service Channel 16 and 70 DSC + Channel 83 for: Navigational warnings, Weather forecasts and Radio Medical Service HUISDUINEN 52.57'.09"N 004.43'.18"E APPINGEDAM VHF Tx/Rx Waddenzee 53.20'.08"N 006.51'.33"E Aerial direction 000 Channel 16 and 70 DSC Transmitting Station MF/HF + Channel 23 for: Navigational warnings, 2187,5 kHz MF DSC Weather forecasts and Radio Medical Service 2182 kHz Emergency Frequency + Other Coast Guard MF Frequencies NORA VHF Tx/Rx 52.17'.35"N 004.28'.19"E Aerial direction 000 Receiving Station M/HF Channel 16 and 70 DSC 2187,5 kHz MF DSC 2182 kHz Emergency Frequency IJsselmeer + Channel 83 for: Navigational warnings, + Other Coast Guard MF Frequencies Weather forecasts and Radio Medical Service SCHEVENINGEN 52.05'.41"N 004.15'.27"E KORNWERDERZAND Transmitting Station MF/HF 53.04'.09"N 005.20'.18"E 2187,5 kHz MF DSC 2182 kHz Emergency Frequency VHF Tx/Rx 518 kHz Navtex Aerial direction 280 3673 kHz for MF Navigational warnings, Channel 16 and 70 DSC + Weather forecasts + Channel 23 for: Navigational warnings, + Other Coast Guard MF Frequencies
    [Show full text]
  • UK Code of Practice Dan Hook, Ceng, FRINA Overview
    UK Code of Practice Dan Hook, CEng, FRINA Overview • MASS - A maturing Industry • Life before an Industry Code of Practice • Development of the Code of Practice • Contents and development going forwards • Application L3 Proprietary MASS - A maturing Industry, ASV’s experience System of Systems New applications ASV SASS - 2002 ASV FMTD4000 - 2007 ASV C-Cat 4 - 2011 ASV C-Sweep / Thales MMCM - 2017 Larger sizes / OTH / Open Ocean Early R&D Bigger / Faster vessels Business case impact Proof of Principles Increasing complexity / capability Training / Operations / Regulations ~ 14% CAGR in market L3 Proprietary Life before a Code of Practice Took a long time Classification Societies Supplier Plan Expensive Confusion in terminology Requirements Lack of ‘something’ to Risk assessments comply with Operator Plan Coast guard authorities Training plans Unsure of responsibilities Operator Manuals Hard to scale an industry or business this way End Customer Plan Insurers As many questions as answers L3 Proprietary Life with the Code of Practice Single point of reference Supplier Plan Classification Continuous improvement Societies Gives customers something to reference in contracts Operator Plan Coast guard authorities Gives operators something to reference in contracts Working document that can reference and link to End Customer Plan Insurers other codes / guides / rules. Requirements Still not perfect but big improvement Risk assessments Training plans Operator Responsibility Operator Manuals L3 Proprietary Development of Code of Practice UK Maritime Autonomous Systems Regulatory Working Group (MASRWG) Chairmanship of James Fanshawe, support of Maritime UK Combined efforts of approximately 60 people across 30+ organisations Regular meetings, sub-committees and lots of voluntary time. (Huge Thanks!) L3 Proprietary Contents # Topic 1 Foreword Version 2.0 available from Nov 2 Definitions 18.
    [Show full text]
  • Maritime Commerce Strategic Outlook
    UNITED STATES COAST GUARD O O O O MARITIME COMMERCE STRATEGIC OUTLOOK $ 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 OCTOBER 2018 WASHINGTON, D.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Sectoral Qualification Frameworks for Coast Guard Functions
    SECTORAL QUALIFICATION FRAMEWORKS FOR COAST GUARD FUNCTIONS EMPLOYABILITY, MOBILITY AND RECOGNITION The European Qualifications Framework: supporting learning, work and cross border mobility Brussels 15-16 March 2018 CIMEA Chiara Finocchietti ECGFA NET Project Project: European Coast Guard Functions Academy Network for European Sectorial Qualification's Framework for Coast Guarding - ECGFA NET (http://www.ecgff.eu) Aims: The ECGFA NET project aims at strengthening international collaboration on training and at building a network of academies and training institutions for Coast Guard functions on ECGFF level. The network of academies would later contribute to the establishment of Sectorial Qualifications Framework for Coast Guard Functions. Coordinator Finnish Border Guard SQF WORKING GROUP PROJECT’S PARTNERS AND OBSERVERS PROJECT’S PARTNERS 1 CYPRUS POLICE 1 CYPRUS 2 DEPARTMENT OF FISHERIES AND MARINE RESEARCH 3 DEPARTMENT OF MERCHANT SHIPPING 2 FINLAND 4 FINNISH BORDER GUARD 3 FRANCE 5 FRENCH CUSTOMS 4 GERMANY 6 GERMAN FEDERAL POLICE 5 GREECE 7 HELLENIC COAST GUARD 6 ITALY 8 ITALIAN COAST GUARD 9 GUARDIA NACIONAL REPUBLICANA 10 PORTUGUESE NAVY 7 PORTUGAL DGRM - GENERAL DIRECTORATE FOR NATURAL RESOURCES, SAFETY AND 11 MARITIME SERVICES 12 PORTUGUESE NATIONAL MARITIME AUTHORITY 13 GUARDIA CIVIL 14 ARMADA ESPANOLA 8 SPAIN 16 SPANISH CUSTOMS AND EXCISES 17 SOCIEDAD DE SALVAMENTO Y SEGURIDAD MARITIMA (SASEMAR) 9 SWEDEN 18 SWEDISH COAST GUARD 10 UNITED KINGDOM 19 UK MARITIME & COASTGUARD AGENCY PROJECT’S OBSERVERS 11 EU AGENGY 20 EUROPEAN FISHERIES
    [Show full text]
  • It's Time for a "Quad" of Coast Guards This Modest Proposal Could Help Bring Stability and Security to the Indo-Pacific, Without the Military Fanfare
    It's time for a "Quad" of Coast Guards This modest proposal could help bring stability and security to the Indo-Pacific, without the military fanfare. By David Brewster The so-called Quad group of Indo-Pacific maritime democracies – Australia, India, Japan, and the United States – is a valuable grouping, although it is still underutilised in many ways. One of the most effective ways that these countries could work together to enhance maritime security in the Indo-Pacific would be through coordinating the work of their coast guard agencies. Much attention is now focused on naval cooperation as a way to stabilise a region that has been destabilised by a rising and often assertive China. There is no doubt this is extremely important, but a great deal of the legwork in maintaining maritime security is increasingly falling to coast guard agencies. The so-called “white hulls” of the region are often on the front line in dealing with issues such as piracy, illegal fishing, humanitarian and disaster relief, search and rescue, and the smuggling of drugs, people, and arms. White hulls are also increasingly being used in roles traditionally reserved for navies. The maritime boundary disputes in the East China Sea and South China Sea are now often played out between coast guards from China and other countries. This trend will likely only continue in the future, as white-hull vessels take an ever-greater share of responsibilities, often with the support of traditional naval assets. There may be a similar trend between other countries. Navies have long been at the forefront of security cooperation, but navy-navy cooperation can sometimes carry serious limitations, driven by both cost and politics.
    [Show full text]